Skip to main content
Nano-Micro Letters logoLink to Nano-Micro Letters
. 2021 Aug 17;13:178. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00686-4

Electrolyte/Structure-Dependent Cocktail Mediation Enabling High-Rate/Low-Plateau Metal Sulfide Anodes for Sodium Storage

Yongchao Tang 1,2,#, Yue Wei 3,#, Anthony F Hollenkamp 2,, Mustafa Musameh 2, Aaron Seeber 2, Tao Jin 2,4, Xin Pan 1, Han Zhang 1, Yanan Hou 1, Zongbin Zhao 1, Xiaojuan Hao 2,, Jieshan Qiu 5,, Chunyi Zhi 6
PMCID: PMC8371071  PMID: 34402993

Highlights

  • Nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases endow CSC anode with electrolyte/structure-dependent cocktail mediation effect, showing superior rate capability and evidently lowered charge plateau compared with CoS2 and SnS2/CoS2 mixture.

  • Alternative electrochemical processes between nano-dispersed different metal sulfides and Na+ carriers effectively overcome intrinsic flaws of monometallic sulfide, responsible for the lowered charge plateau of CSC.

  • As-assembled CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cell shows high-rate capability, and high discharge plateau up to 2.57 V, which is comparable to that with alloy-type anodes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40820-021-00686-4.

Keywords: Metal sulfide anode, Rate capability, Voltage plateau, Cocktail mediation effect, Sodium-ion batteries

Abstract

As promising anodes for sodium-ion batteries, metal sulfides ubiquitously suffer from low-rate and high-plateau issues, greatly hindering their application in full-cells. Herein, exemplifying carbon nanotubes (CNTs)-stringed metal sulfides superstructure (CSC) assembled by nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases, cocktail mediation effect similar to that of high-entropy materials is initially studied in ether-based electrolyte to solve the challenges. The high nano-dispersity of metal sulfides in CSC anode underlies the cocktail-like mediation effect, enabling the circumvention of intrinsic drawbacks of different metal sulfides. By utilizing ether-based electrolyte, the reversibility of metal sulfides is greatly improved, sustaining a long-life effectivity of cocktail-like mediation. As such, CSC effectively overcomes low-rate flaw of SnS2 and high-plateau demerit of CoS2, simultaneously realizes a high rate and a low plateau. In half-cells, CSC delivers an ultrahigh-rate capability of 327.6 mAh g−1anode at 20 A g−1, far outperforming those of monometallic sulfides (SnS2, CoS2) and their mixtures. Compared with CoS2 phase and SnS2/CoS2 mixture, CSC shows remarkably lowered average charge voltage up to ca. 0.62 V. As-assembled CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cell shows a good rate capability (0.05 ~ 1.0 A g−1, 120.3 mAh g−1electrode at 0.05 A g−1) and a high average discharge voltage up to 2.57 V, comparable to full-cells with alloy-type anodes. Kinetics analysis verifies that the cocktail-like mediation effect largely boosts the charge transfer and ionic diffusion in CSC, compared with single phase and mixed phases. Further mechanism study reveals that alternative and complementary electrochemical processes between nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases are responsible for the lowered charge voltage of CSC. This electrolyte/structure-dependent cocktail-like mediation effect effectively enhances the practicability of metal sulfide anodes, which will boost the development of high-rate/-voltage sodium-ion full batteries.graphic file with name 40820_2021_686_Figa_HTML.jpg

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40820-021-00686-4.

Introduction

With the merits of high capacity and low cost, metal sulfides have been recognized as promising anode materials for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) [1, 2]. However, most metal sulfide anodes examined to date exhibit poor high-rate performance and/or voltage behavior that trends rapidly to relatively high values. The result is full-cells that only operate well at a low rate (≤0.5 A g−1electrode) and maintain average output voltages typically ≤2 V _ENREF_6 [38]. At this level of performance, such cells are only slightly better than a number of advantages in energy density over aqueous batteries (e.g., zinc batteries) but noncomparable safety to the latter [912]. Thus far, many studies on metal sulfide anodes still focus on the enhancement in reversible capacity, rate capability, and cyclability in half-cells. Even few studies concerning the properties of metal sulfide anodes in full-cells, most of them only roughly evaluate the performance of full-cells based on anodes instead of total electrodes. This could result in certain intrinsic flaws of metal sulfide anodes underrated [10]. Therefore, from the perspective of full-cell, to solve the low-rate and high-plateau issues of metal sulfide anodes is crucial for the development of high-performance full-cells (Scheme 1a).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

a Prototype of full-cells. b Rate capability comparison of typical metal sulfide anodes in half-cells. c Discharge plateau comparison in full-cells with different metal sulfide anodes showing the merits of FMS/AMS ultrastructure

Different metal sulfides usually show electrolyte/structure-dependent electrochemical properties, offering valuable inspiration to rationally design new architectures and investigate their properties in proper electrolyte [3, 13, 14]. Compared with ester-based electrolytes, ether-based electrolytes can effectively inhibit3 the shuttle effect of polysulfides in situ formed during discharge/charge processes, thus more beneficial to obtain reversible properties of metal sulfides [1, 13, 15]. Ferromagnetic metal (Fe, Co, Ni, etc.) sulfides (FMSs) are very promising conversion-reaction anode materials widely studied for SIBs [1619]. Compared with conventional hard carbon or red phosphorous anodes, FMS anodes can display ultrahigh-rate capability (≥20 A g−1) in ether-based electrolyte, holding a great promise in SIBs (Scheme 1b) [2022]. However, FMS anode usually suffers from severe voltage hysteresis and high plateau (~1.9 V vs Na/Na+), largely lowering the discharge plateau of full-cells (Scheme 1c). From this point, mono-component FMSs seem to be difficult to meet the requirements for high-performance full-cells. So far, despite many relevant studies, most of them are inclined to ignoring the severe intrinsic flaws of FMSs, emphasizing to enhance capacity and cyclability. By contrast, another series of metal (Sn, Sb, Bi, etc.) sulfides (AMSs) with conversion/alloying-reaction mechanisms can show acceptable voltage hysteresis and relatively lower voltage plateau [2330]. However, these AMSs always suffer from severe volume change during discharge/charge processes, resulting in poor rate capability and cyclability in ester-based electrolytes (Scheme 1b). Owing to latent catalysis over the decomposition of certain ether, such AMSs remain scarcely investigated in ether-based electrolyte [31, 32]. Encouragingly, by utilizing fluorine-containing sodium salt in ether solvents as electrolyte, the undesirable catalysis of AMSs can be effectively suppressed to allow a stable battery operation [33, 34]. The good compatibility enables the investigation of electrochemical properties of FMS/AMS composites in ether-based electrolytes. In the multi-component metal sulfide anodes, each component functions as active material and mutually compete. Thus, the electrochemical behaviors of multi-component metal sulfides are comprehensive results from individual component. Given that exotic properties beyond rule-of-mixtures (cocktail-like mediation effect) in multi-component high-entropy nano-systems [35, 36], to construct new superstructures assembled by nano-dispersed FMSs and AMSs and to study their properties in ether-based elctrolytes, could be an effective strategy toward high-performance full-cells. Additionally, the poor conductivity of most metal sulfides makes them essential to further combine with highly conductive carbon materials. Such combination can endow rational architectures with fast ion/electron transfer, which is conducive to obtaining satisfactory electrochemical properties [13, 3739]. So far, despite some studies pertaining to FMS/AMS composites, the certain agglomeration or phase separation between FMS and AMS remains unsatisfactory to investigate their comprehensive impact. Additionally, such studies mostly involved the electrochemical properties of FMS/AMS composites in carbonate-based electrolytes [4042]. Thus, to study the voltage behavior of metal sulfide composites in ether-based electrolytes will provide a new perspective to pursue desired sodium storage properties.

Herein, CNTs-stringed metal sulfides superstructure anode assembled by nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases (CSC, C: CNT; S: SnS2; C: CoS2) is engineered to combine the merits of FMS- and AMS-type anode materials, aiming at simultaneously solving the dual-problems of poor rate capability/output-voltage characteristics (Scheme 1b-c). The highly nano-dispersed metal sulfides in CSC show remarkable cocktail-like mediation effect, effectively circumventing intrinsic drawbacks of different metal sulfides. The ether-based electrolyte greatly enhances the reversibility of metal sulfides, which can inhibit the aggregation of homogenous metal sulfides, enabling a long-life effectivity of cocktail-like mediation. In half-cells, CSC delivers an ultrahigh-rate capability of 327.6 mAh g−1 at 20 A g−1, showing remarkably lowered average charge plateau up to 0.62 V vs Na/Na+, compared with CoS2 phase and SnS2/CoS2 mixture. The as-assembled CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cell shows a good rate capability (0.05 ~ 1.0 A g−1, 120.3 mAh g−1electrode at 0.05 A g−1) and a high average discharge voltage up to 2.57 V, comparable to full-cells with alloy-type anodes. Kinetics and mechanism studies reveal that the cocktail mediation effect largely boosts the charge transfer and ionic diffusion in CSC; along the diffusion direction of Na+ carriers, alternative and complementary electrochemical processes between different nano-dispersed metal sulfides (SnS2, CoS2) and Na+ carriers are responsible for the lowered average charge plateau of CSC. This exhibited cocktail-like mediation effect evidently improves the practicability of metal sulfide anodes, which will boost the development of high-rate/-voltage sodium-ion full batteries.

Results and Discussion

Materials Preparation and Characterization

The CSC was initially obtained by ion-exchange reaction between thiostannate (SnxSyn−) and cobalt-based zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-67) followed by annealing treatment (Fig. 1a). For an enhanced conductivity of the resulting CSC, the ZIF-67 particles (C-ZIF-67) are connected together (‘stringed’) by a network of CNTs (Fig. S1). Sn119 NMR spectroscopy reveals that several tetravalent thiostannate species (SnS32−, SnS44−, and Sn2S64−) exist in solution and these are referred to collectively as ‘SnxSyn−’ (Fig. S2) [43]. Within the ion-exchange process, Co2+ in ZIF-67 reacts rapidly with SnxSyn− species, forming a unique superstructure comprised of nano-dispersed CoS2 and SnS2 phases. The overall reaction follows Eq. (1):

SnxSyn-+Co2+SnS2+CoS21x2,3y6,2n4 1

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Schematic illustration of fabrication process of CSC, inset (right) showing the reaction between ZIF-67 and SnxSyn−. b XRD patterns of CNTs and CSC. c Mass content of CoS2, SnS2, and CNTs in the CSC. d N2 adsorption isotherm of CSC and corresponding pore width distribution. e FE-SEM images of CSC (inset displaying the core/shell structure of CSC). f TEM image of CSC and g TEM-EDS element mapping of CSC including C, Co, Sn, and S. HR-TEM images of h shell and i core in CSC showing co-assembly of nano-CoS2 and -SnS2

As shown in Fig. 1b, X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns exhibit the diffraction peaks of CoS2 (PDF No. 00-41-1471), SnS2 (PDF No. 00-23-0677), and carbon, verifying their presence in the CSC. Compared with standard phase, the reflection for the (0 0 1) plane of SnS2 registers a slight shift toward lower angles, implying an expanded interlayer spacing [14, 44]. The expanded interlayer spacing could be associated with the use of thiostannate precursor and low-temperature ion-exchange process. The ion-exchange reaction of thiostannate with ZIF-67 typically occurs at −5 °C in 1 h, where fast reassembly of SnS2 results in the expanded interlayer spacing. Also, the relatively low annealing temperature (450 °C) is beneficial to retain the expanded interlayer spacing of SnS2. The content of carbon nanotubes in CSC is obtained by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), which is ca. 3.75 wt% (Fig. S3). By inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), the elemental content of CSC is analyzed, revealing that the mole ratio of Co/Sn/S is ca. 1.00/1.73/5.46 (Table S1). The corresponding mass content of CoS2 and SnS2 in the CSC is 26.95 and 69.30wt%, respectively (Fig. 1c). The type-IV N2 adsorption isotherms of CSC present an evident hysteresis loop, indicating the presence of mesopores (Fig. 1d). The corresponding pore width (inset) mainly centers in the range of 20–45 nm. The theoretical capacity of CSC anode (CT-CSC) can be evaluated roughly according to the equation: CT-CSC = xCT-CoS2 + yCT-SnS2, where x and y is the percentage content of CoS2 and SnS2 in the CSC. The CT-CoS2 and CT-SnS2 are the theoretical capacity of CoS2 and SnS2, which is 872 and 1136 mAh g−1, respectively. Thus, CT-CSC = 0.2695 × 872 + 0.695 × 1136 = 1024.5 mAh g−1.

Figure 1e exhibits field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of CSC, which consists of carbon nanotubes-stringed core/shell architecture (inset). Such core/shell structures are greatly influenced by precursors, solvents, reaction temperatures, and concentrations (Figs. S4–S6). The content of SnS2 in the CSC can be tuned to some extent by varying the concentration of thiostannate solution (Fig. S6). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image shows the typical radial morphology of the CSC (Fig. 1f). Energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) elemental mapping yields a distribution of the elements C, Sn, Co, and S in the CSC, which correspond well with the TEM image (Fig. 1g). The details of shell and core were further characterized by TEM. The shell is actually composed of nanosheets (Fig. S7a). As displayed in Fig. 1h, high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) image clearly exhibits interplanar spacings of 0.248 and 0.615 nm for CoS2 (2 1 0) and SnS2 (0 0 1) lattice planes, verifying such nanosheets assembled by nano-dispersed SnS2 (red) and CoS2 (blue-green). The TEM-EDS line-scan profiles show matched peaks with Co, Sn, S elements, further suggesting the superstructure of shell co-assembled by SnS2 and CoS2 phases (Fig. S7b). Corresponding to SEM image of CSC (inset), the core of CSC shows an abundant microstructure, in which the pore (green) can be observed (Fig. S8a). As shown in Fig. 1i, HR-TEM image of the core also exposes the lattice planes of SnS2 (0 0 1) and CoS2 (2 1 0), which accord with the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Fig. S8b). Such results verify that the core of CSC is also assembled by nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases. The CSC was further analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). As shown in Fig. S9, compared with commercial CoS2 sample, the high-resolution of XPS of Co 2p of CSC shows a ca. 0.45 eV shift toward higher binding energy. Moreover, the high-resolution of XPS of Sn 3d of CSC also appears a 0.61 eV shift toward higher binding energy. Such results imply the presence of chemical effect between CoS2 and SnS2 in CSC anodes [45, 46].

Half-Cell Properties

The electrochemical properties of anode materials are firstly evaluated by testing half-cells with Na foil as counter electrode and ether-based electrolytes with fluorine-containing sodium salt. For comparison, commercial SnS2 and CoS2 powders with well-matched XRD patterns to standard phases are also tested (Fig. S10). Compared with the CSC, the N2 isotherms of commercial SnS2 and CoS2 samples typically exhibit no evident hysteresis loop, whereby the corresponding pore diameter distributions display nonporous properties (Fig. S11). After initial three scans at 0.1 mV s−1, mono-component metal sulfides (CoS2 and SnS2) and anodes composed of both compounds show gradually stabilized CV curves (Fig. S12). The initial CV curve of the CSC anode shows three oxidation peaks, which are associated with SnS2 phase at 0.70–1.55 V and CoS2 phase at 1.70–2.10 V, respectively. The reduction peak at 1.60–1.80 V is correlated with the CoS2 phase, while the peaks at 0.50–1.10 V are linked to SnS2 and formation of solid electrolyte interphase (Fig. S13a). In subsequent scans, the reduction peak related to CoS2 gradually disappears, which could result from electrochemical activation of nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases [16, 22]. As shown in Fig. 2a, the activated CSC delivers a main oxidized peak potential range (0.75–1.65 V), which is close to that of SnS2 (0.80–1.45 V) but remarkably lower than that of CoS2 (1.30–2.18 V) and SnS2/CoS2 mixture (1.25–2.15 V). Correspondingly, CSC anode displays an average charge voltage of ca. 1.30 V, which is close to that of SnS2 but lower than that of CoS2 (ca. 1.92 V) (Fig. 2b). Compared with commercial SnS2/CoS2 mixture with average charge voltage of ca. 1.81 V, CSC anode also shows evident low-plateau merit (Fig. 2c). This verifies that the construction of a superstructure assembled from nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases is crucial for lowering the intrinsically high plateau of the CoS2 phase. Specifically, as shown in Fig. 2d, the introduction of nano-dispersed SnS2 phase into CSC effectively lowers the intrinsic average charge voltage of CoS2 up to ca. 0.62 V. This in turn will translate to a higher plateau voltage for full-cells, thereby improving their energy density.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a CV curves and b, c corresponding discharge–charge curves of CSC, commercial SnS2 and CoS2, and SnS2/CoS2 mixture. d Histogram showing the average charge plateau voltages of various anodes in half-cells. e Capacity/charge plateau comparison of different anodes. f Rate capability of CSC, commercial SnS2 and CoS2 in half-cells. g Rate capability comparison of different anodes. h Long-life cyclability of CSC anode at 1 and 10 A g−1 (CE Coulombic efficiency)

Compared with other metal chalcogenide anodes, CSC exhibits obvious high-capacity and low-plateau advantages (Fig. 2e). Moreover, compared with commercial SnS2 and CoS2, and mixtures of the two, CSC shows a remarkably improved rate capability, ranging from 0.5 to 20 A g−1 with a high capacity of 327.6 mAh g−1anode at 20 A g−1 (Fig. 2f). The corresponding discharge/charge curves are exhibited in Fig. S14. When tested with ester-based electrolyte, CSC shows similar CV curves to that in ether-based electrolyte, but the reversible capacity, to the same cutoff voltage, shrinks markedly (Fig. S15). In addition, compared with in ether-based electrolyte, the rate capability of CSC is greatly deteriorated (Fig. S16), along with an increased resistance of charge transfer (Fig. S17). Such phenomena suggest the key role of ether-based electrolyte in stabilizing metal sulfide anodes and realizing fast charge transfer, which could be associated with good compatibility between metal sulfide and ether solvent [1, 15]. Evidently, the CSC anode effectively circumvents the intrinsic high voltage of CoS2 and low-rate drawback of SnS2 in ether-based electrolyte. Compared with other anode materials in half-cells, CSC also shows a remarkable high-rate capability (Fig. 2g, Table S2)_ENREF_12_ENREF_13_ENREF_14_ENREF_15_ENREF_16_ENREF_17_ENREF_18 [4754]. The CSC can be cycled at high current densities (1 and 10 A g−1) with excellent long-life cyclability, specifically, 410.8 mAh g−1anode at 10 A g−1 over 500 cycles without decay (Fig. 2h).

Electrochemical Kinetics

The electrochemical kinetics of the CSC anode in half-cells is studied in detail by reference to the results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Compared with electrodes made from commercial samples of SnS2 and CoS2, the Nyquist curve for a typical CSC anode shows a semi-circle with smaller diameter, implying a faster charge transfer (Fig. 3a). Based on the derived equivalent circuit, the resistances of charge transfer for CSC, commercial SnS2 and CoS2 anodes are 9.5, 32.7, and 13.4 Ω, respectively (Fig. 3b). To compare Na+ diffusion coefficient (DNa+) in CSC and SnS2/CoS2 mixture, galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) was conducted at 0.05 A g−1 for 0.5 h, followed by relaxation for 2 h. The typical GITT discharge profiles of CSC and SnS2/CoS2 mixture are shown in Fig. 3c. As illustrated in Fig. 3d, DNa+ can be calculated following equation DNa+=4L2πτΔESΔEt2, where L is Na+ diffusion length (cm), τ is the current impulse time (s), t is relaxation time (s), ΔES is steady-state potential change (V), ΔEt is the instantaneous potential change (V) used to deduce IR drop [55, 56]. Corresponding to the GITT profiles, the calculated average DNa+ is ca. 0.5 × 10–9 cm2 s−1, which is around twice that in half-cell with SnS2/CoS2 mixture (Fig. 3e). Evidently, compared with simply mixed SnS2/CoS2 anode, the CSC assembly of nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 particles shows remarkable superiority in terms of charge transfer kinetics and ionic diffusion.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Nyquist plots of different anodes in half-cells and b corresponding equivalent circuit and charge transfer resistance (Rct). c GITT profiles of Na//CSC half-cell discharged and d typical profile in a single GITT test. e Na+ diffusion coefficient distribution corresponding to a typical discharge curve of Na//CSC half-cell (inset). f CV curves of Na//CSC half-cell at different scan rates. g b-values obtained by fitting peak current-scan rate correlation based on CV curves of Na//CSC half-cell. h Pseudocapacitive contribution (pseudocapa. contri.) of Na//CSC at different scan rates. i CV profiles of Na//CSC at 1.5 mV s−1 and corresponding pseudocapacitive contribution (shaded region)

Next, the pseudocapacitive contribution to charge storage in the Na//CSC half-cell was evaluated, on the basis that this component gives rise to faster charge transfer kinetics. CV curves at different rates are shown in Fig. 3f, and the correlation of peak currents (i) and scan rates (v) was assessed against the relationship i = avb, where a and b are adjustable constants [57]. As shown in Fig. 3g, the resultant b-values are 0.98, 0.81, and 0.93, respectively, which implies the presence of a substantial pseudocapacitive contribution. The latter can be quantified through the equation i = k1v + k2v1/2, where k1v and k2v1/2 represent pseudocapacitive and ion-diffusion controlled contribution, respectively [5759]. As shown in Fig. 3h, CSC anodes exhibit dominant pseudocapacitive contributions at scan rates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.5 mV s−1, specifically, 64.0%, 67.0%, 71.6%, 78.3%, and 86.3%, respectively. Figure 3i displays the CV curves of Na//CSC at 1.5 mV s−1, in which the shaded region represents the pseudocapacitive contribution. This, together with the small charge transfer resistance and high DNa+, explains the excellent rate capability of the CSC anode.

Electrochemical Mechanism

To investigate the mechanism that underpins the superior electrochemical behavior of CSC anodes, samples were at various states-of-(dis)charge characterized by ex situ XRD. The copper current collector in a Na//Cu half-cell discharged to 0.4 V shows only the intrinsic diffraction peaks for metallic copper, verifying no evident electrochemical reaction between Na and Cu collector in ether-based electrolyte (Fig. S18). Compared with original samples (CSC, commercial SnS2 and CoS2), the samples after electrochemical activation exhibit dramatically different XRD patterns, indicating the occurrence of phase transition (Fig. S19). For CoS2, the relevant electrochemical reactions are as follows: CoS2 + xNa+  + xe → NaxCoS2, NaxCoS2 + (4 − x)Na+  + (4 − x)e ↔ 2Na2S + Co [60]. For SnS2, the corresponding electrochemical reactions are as follows: xNa+  + SnS2 + xe → NaxSnS2, NaxSnS2 + (4-x)Na+  + (4-x)e ↔ 2Na2S + Sn, Sn + yNa+  + ye ↔ NaySn [40, 61]. Compared with single phases, the CSC anode shows similar featured diffraction peaks to pure SnS2, while the peaks from the CoS2 diffraction pattern are difficult to discern. This could be associated with differences in crystallinity between products derived from SnS2 and CoS2. For investigating the mechanism of activated CSC, original CSC anodes were activated for at least 3 cycles to obtain phase-transformed materials. Corresponding to the discharge–charge-time curves in Fig. 4a, the activated CSC anodes at various states-of-charge show repeatable XRD patterns, implying good reversibility during the discharge/charge processes (Fig. 4b). The peak intensity of XRD pattern of anode (such as C-0.97 V, blue) is lower than that of initially charged anode (such as C-0.97 V, pink), which could be associated with the decreased diameter and gradually aggravated amorphization of metal sulfide phases. Similar phenomena have been reported in other metal chalcogenide anodes such as CoSe2 and CoS2 [13, 60]. At different (dis)charge states, the corresponding XRD of anodes shows different patterns, which should be correlated to the successive formation of different products.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a Discharge–charge-time curve and b ex situ XRD patterns of CSC anode at different potentials. c HR-TEM image and d SAED pattern of CSC discharged to 0.4 V. e HR-TEM image and f SAED pattern of CSC charged to 2.9 V. g Schematic illustration of discharge/charge mechanisms of CSC anode. h Schematic illustration of reaction route and charge voltage change trend of CoS2 anode. i Schematic illustration of reaction route and charge voltage change trend of CSC anode, showing cocktail mediation effect among nano-dispersed metal sulfide phases in CSC

As shown in Fig. 4c, HR-TEM image of CSC discharged to 0.4 V displays interplanar spacings of 0.569 and 0.316 nm, corresponding to lattice plane (0 0 4) of Na29.58Sn8 and (1 0 1) of Co. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns reveal the lattice plane (2 1 1) of Co, (5 1 3) and (1 3 1) of Na29.58Sn8 in the discharged product (Fig. 4d). When charged back to 2.9 V, the crystalline domains in the resulting product are remarkably smaller than those in the discharged state. As shown in Fig. 4e, HR-TEM image of CSC charged to 2.9 V displays interplanar spacings of 0.184 and 0.295 nm, which are assigned to lattice plane of (2 2 1)’ of NaxCoS2 and (0 0 2)’ of NaxSnS2 (with CoS2 and SnS2 standard phases as reference), respectively. The SAED pattern exhibits typical polycrystalline features, in which lattice plane (2 2 0) of NaxCoS2, (1 0 3) and (1 0 0) of NaxSnS2 can be identified (Fig. 4f). Based on the characterization above, the progress of electrochemical reduction, followed by oxidation, for the CSC electrode is illustrated in Fig. 4g. Typically, SnS2 and CoS2 phases in CSC experience an initial phase transition to Na+-intercalated intermediates (NaxMS2, M = Sn, Co), which act as active materials for subsequent discharge/charge cycles. Based on the analysis above, the exotic property mediation beyond rule-of-mixtures [35, 36] (cocktail mediation effect) among nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases in CSC is schematically illustrated in Fig. 4h–i. Specifically, along the different ionic diffusion directions, the nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases in CSC will alternatively react with Na+ carriers, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4i. The nano-dispersion of SnS2 and CoS2 phases effectively shortens the ion diffusion path, which can kinetically boost electrochemical processes of both metal sulfide anodes. Due to intrinsic thermodynamics difference, the electrochemical competition is present between SnS2 and CoS2 phases. Also, it does not exclude one of the two phases could show local kinetic merit owing to the diameter difference between them. Thus, in the CSC anode, the alternative electrochemical reaction processes could coexist between the two phases. It enables complementary charge voltage plateau of different metal sulfide phases, resulting in lowered charge plateau of CSC anode.

Full-Cell Properties

To verify the practicability of the CSC anode, a high-voltage cathode material Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 was employed to assemble CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells. Synthesis of Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 followed a modified literature method (Supporting Information), and yielded a micro-particle morphology with a well-matched XRD pattern with the standard phase (Fig. S20) [33]. Corresponding to CV curves, Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 cathode shows ca. 3.9 V discharge plateau with low electrochemical polarization, which is suitable for demonstrating the practicability of different anodes (Fig. S21a, b). The Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 cathode delivers a good rate capability from 0.05 to 0.5 A g−1, showing a high reversible capacity of 124.1 mAh g−1electrode at 0.05 A/g (Fig. S21c, d). Over 350 cycles at 0.1 A g−1, the Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 cathode shows a capacity of 106.4 mAh g−1electrode, corresponding to a low capacity decay of 0.02% per cycle (Fig. S22). Figure 5a shows the typical CV curves of CoS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7, SnS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7, and CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells at 0.5 mV s−1. Evidently, the main redox peaks of CoS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 appear at 1.0–2.5 V, implying that its average discharge voltage is in the range. In contrast, the ranges of main redox peaks of SnS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 and CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells are in 2.0–4.0 V, which imply a higher average discharge voltage than that of the former. Figure 5b shows that the discharge capacity available from the CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 cell, while the voltage is above 2 V, is ca. 61.7 mAh g−1electrode, which is 1.62 times that of CoS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7. As displayed in Fig. 5c, CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells present an average discharge voltage of 2.57 V, which is close to that of SnS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 and ca. 0.62 V higher than that with CoS2 anode. The CSC anode confers a significantly higher average voltage during discharge of full-cells when compared with CoS2 cells. Compared with other full-cells reported previously, CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells also show obvious merits in terms of discharge voltage and capacity (Fig. 5d). Moreover, CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells show a high-rate capability from 0.05 to 1 A g−1, delivering a high capacity of 120.3 mAh g−1electrode at 0.05 A g−1 (Fig. 5e). The corresponding discharge/charge curves are shown in Fig. S23, where the voltage plateaus are well-retained. As exhibited in Fig. 5f, compared with other full-cells with different electrode materials, CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cell delivers comparable merits in terms of energy/power density. [6267] Specifically, ~106.1 Wh kg−1electrode/1278.3 W kg−1electrode are achieved at 1 A g−1. When operated over 120 cycles at 0.25 A g−1, CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cell shows a high capacity of 63.0 mAh g−1electrode with a low decay of 0.20% per cycle (Fig. 5g). Such results suggest a good practicability of CSC in full-cells.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

a CV curves of CoS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7, SnS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7, and CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells at 0.5 mV s−1. b Corresponding discharge/charge curves and c discharge plateaus of full-cells at 0.05 A g−1. d Discharge plateau/capacity comparison of different full-cells. e Rate capability of CoS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7, SnS2//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7, and CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells. f Ragone plots comparison of different full-cells. g Long-life cyclability of CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cells at 0.25 A g−1

Conclusions

Despite with high-capacity and low-cost merits, the ubiquitous low-rate and high-plateau issues greatly lower the practicability of metal sulfide anodes in full-cells. Herein, enlightened by electrolyte/structure-dependent properties of metal sulfides, CSC anode assembled by nano-dispersed SnS2 and CoS2 phases is engineered as a case study in ether-based electrolyte, simultaneously realizing high-rate and low-plateau properties. The high nano-dispersity of metal sulfides endows CSC anode with evident cocktail mediation effect similar to high-entropy materials, effectively circumventing intrinsic drawbacks of different metal sulfides. The utilized ether-based electrolyte greatly enhances the reversibility of metal sulfides, sustaining a long-life effectivity of cocktail-like mediation. In half-cells, CSC delivers an ultrahigh-rate capability of 327.6 mAh g−1anode at 20 A g−1 and remarkably lowered average charge voltage up to ca. 0.62 V, far outperforming CoS2 phase and SnS2/CoS2 mixture. The as-assembled CSC//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 full-cell shows a good rate capability (0.05–1.0 A g−1, 120.3 mAh g−1electrode at 0.05 A g−1) and a high average discharge voltage up to 2.57 V, comparable to full-cells with alloy-type anodes. Kinetics and mechanism studies further verify that the cocktail-like mediation effect largely boosts charge transfer and ionic diffusion in CSC, while alternative and complementary electrochemical processes between different nano-dispersed metal sulfides (SnS2 and CoS2) and Na+ carriers account for the lowered charge plateau of CSC. This work shows a unique electrolyte/structure-dependent cocktail-like mediation effect of metal sulfide anodes, which will boost the development of high-rate/-voltage sodium-ion full batteries.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China (No. 2019A1515110980), research project from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21361162004), China Scholarship Council, and CSIRO. We acknowledge Dr Yesim Gozukara, Dr Malisja de Vries, and Dr Yunxia Yang from CSIRO (Clayton) for their help with material characterization training.

Footnotes

Yongchao Tang and Yue Wei author have contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Anthony F. Hollenkamp, Email: Tony.Hollenkamp@csiro.au

Xiaojuan Hao, Email: Xiaojuan.Hao@csiro.au.

Jieshan Qiu, Email: qiujs@mail.buct.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Hu Z, Liu Q, Chou SL, Dou SX. Advances and challenges in metal sulfides/selenides for next-generation rechargeable sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2017;29(48):1700606. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fang Y, Luan D, Lou XW. Recent advances on mixed metal sulfides for advanced sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020;32(42):2002976. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tang Y, Zhao Z, Hao X, Wang Y, et al. Engineering hollow polyhedrons structured from carbon-coated CoSe2 nanospheres bridged by cnts with boosted sodium storage performance. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5(26):13591–13600. doi: 10.1039/C7TA02665J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tang Y, Zhao Z, Hao X, Wei Y, et al. Cellular carbon-wrapped FeSe2 nanocavities with ultrathin walls and multiple rooms for ion diffusion-confined ultrafast sodium storage. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7(9):4469–4479. doi: 10.1039/C8TA10614B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xiao Y, Lee SH, Sun Y-K. The application of metal sulfides in sodium ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;7(3):1601329. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang J, Wang L, Eng C, Wang J. Elucidating the irreversible mechanism and voltage hysteresis in conversion reaction for high-energy sodium–metal sulfide batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;7(14):1602706. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602706. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guo Q, Ma Y, Chen T, Xia Q, et al. Cobalt sulfide quantum dot embedded N/S-doped carbon nanosheets with superior reversibility and rate capability for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2017;11(12):12658–12667. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lou X-W. Bullet-like Cu9S5 hollow particles coated with nitrogen-doped carbon for sodium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;131(23):7826–7830. doi: 10.1002/ange.201902988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tang Y, Li X, Lv H, Xie D, et al. Stabilized Co3+/Co4+ redox pair in in situ produced CoSe2−x-derived cobalt oxides for alkaline Zn batteries with 10,000-cycle lifespan and 1.9-V voltage plateau. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020;10(25):2000892. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eftekhari A. Low voltage anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2017;7:157–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li X, Tang Y, Zhu J, Lv H, et al. Boosting the cycling stability of aqueous flexible Zn batteries via F doping in nickel–cobalt carbonate hydroxide cathode. Small. 2020;16(31):2001935. doi: 10.1002/smll.202001935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chao D, Zhou W, Xie F, Ye C, et al. Roadmap for advanced aqueous batteries: from design of materials to applications. Sci. Adv. 2020;6(21):eaba4098. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba4098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang K, Park M, Zhou L, Lee G-H, et al. Urchin-like CoSe2 as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26(37):6728–6735. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201602608. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tang Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Dong Y, et al. Carbon-stabilized interlayer-expanded few-layer MoSe2 nanosheets for sodium ion batteries with enhanced rate capability and cycling performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8(47):32324–32332. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b11230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qi S, Mi L, Song K, Yang K, et al. Understanding shuttling effect in sodium ion batteries for the solution of capacity fading: FeS2 as an example. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123(5):2775–2782. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dong C, Guo L, Li H, Zhang B, et al. Rational fabrication of CoS2/Co4S3@N-doped carbon microspheres as excellent cycling performance anode for half/full sodium ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020;25:679–686. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Man Z, Li P, Zhou D, Wang Y, et al. Two birds with one stone: FeS2@C yolk–shell composite for high-performance sodium-ion energy storage and electromagnetic wave absorption. Nano Lett. 2020;20(5):3769–3777. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li S, He W, Liu B, Cui J, et al. One-step construction of three-dimensional nickel sulfide-embedded carbon matrix for sodium-ion batteries and hybrid capacitors. Energy Storage Mater. 2020;25:636–643. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang Y, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Dong Y, et al. Ultrasmall MoS2 nanosheets mosaiced into nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon matrix for enhanced sodium storage performance. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;225:369–377. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li Y, Hu Y-S, Titirici M-M, Chen L, et al. Hard carbon microtubes made from renewable cotton as high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016;6(18):1600659. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600659. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jin H, Lu H, Wu W, Chen S, et al. Tailoring conductive networks within hollow carbon nanospheres to host phosphorus for advanced sodium ion batteries. Nano Energy. 2020;70:104569. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang K, Park M, Zhou L, Lee G-H, et al. Cobalt-doped FeS2 nanospheres with complete solid solubility as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55(41):12822–12826. doi: 10.1002/anie.201607469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang X, Dong Y, et al. Flexible paper-like free-standing electrodes by anchoring ultrafine SnS2 nanocrystals on graphene nanoribbons for high-performance sodium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9(18):15484–15491. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b02394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu Z, Daali A, Xu G-L, Zhuang M, et al. Highly reversible sodiation/desodiation from a carbon-sandwiched SnS2 nanosheet anode for sodium ion batteries. Nano Lett. 2020;20(5):3844–3851. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ou X, Cao L, Liang X, Zheng F, et al. Fabrication of SnS2/Mn2SnS4/carbon heterostructures for sodium-ion batteries with high initial coulombic efficiency and cycling stability. ACS Nano. 2019;13(3):3666–3676. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xiong X, Wang G, Lin Y, Wang Y, et al. Enhancing sodium ion battery performance by strongly binding nanostructured Sb2S3 on sulfur-doped graphene sheets. ACS Nano. 2016;10(12):10953–10959. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cao L, Gao X, Zhang B, Ou X, et al. Bimetallic sulfide Sb2S3@FeS2 hollow nanorods as high-performance anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2020;14(3):3610–3620. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dong S, Li C, Ge X, Li Z, et al. ZnS-Sb2S3@C core-double shell polyhedron structure derived from metal–organic framework as anodes for high performance sodium ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2017;11(6):6474–6482. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huang Y, Hu X, Li J, Zhang J, et al. Rational construction of heterostructured core-shell Bi2S3@Co9S8 complex hollow particles toward high-performance Li- and Na-ion storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2020;29:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Qu B, Ma C, Ji G, Xu C, et al. Layered SnS2-reduced graphene oxide composite: a high-capacity, high-rate, and long-cycle life sodium-ion battery anode material. Adv. Mater. 2014;26(23):3854–3859. doi: 10.1002/adma.201306314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gao X, Yang X, Li M, Sun Q, et al. Cobalt-doped SnS2 with dual active centers of synergistic absorption-catalysis effect for high-S loading Li-S batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29(8):1806724. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201806724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hu M, Zhang H, Yang L, Lv R. Ultrahigh rate sodium-ion storage of SnS/SnS2 heterostructures anchored on S-doped reduced graphene oxide by ion-assisted growth. Carbon. 2019;143:21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu Y, Cao W, Yin Y, Sheng J, et al. Novel NaTi2(PO4)3 nanowire clusters as high performance cathodes for mg-na hybrid-ion batteries. Nano Energy. 2019;55:526–533. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xie J, Zhu Y, Zhuang N, Li X, et al. High-concentration ether-based electrolyte boosts the electrochemical performance of SnS2–reduced graphene oxide for K-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7(33):19332–19341. doi: 10.1039/C9TA06418D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pickering EJ, Jones NG. High-entropy alloys: A critical assessment of their founding principles and future prospects. Int. Mater. Rev. 2016;61(3):183–202. doi: 10.1080/09506608.2016.1180020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ma Y, Ma Y, Wang Q, Schweidler S, et al. High-entropy energy materials: Challenges and new opportunities. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021;14:2883–2905. doi: 10.1039/D1EE00505G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim J, Choi MS, Shin KH, Kota M, et al. Rational design of carbon nanomaterials for electrochemical sodium storage and capture. Adv. Mater. 2019;31(34):1803444. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xiong P, Bai P, Li A, Li B, et al. Bismuth nanoparticle@carbon composite anodes for ultralong cycle life and high-rate sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2019;31(48):1904771. doi: 10.1002/adma.201904771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li C, Wang S, Wang G, Wang S, et al. NH4V4O10/RGO composite as a high-performance electrode material for hybrid capacitive deionization. Environ. Sci. Wat. Res. 2020;6(2):303–311. doi: 10.1039/C9EW00499H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shi L, Li D, Yao P, Yu J, et al. SnS2 nanosheets coating on nanohollow cubic CoS2/C for ultralong life and high rate capability half/full sodium-ion batteries. Small. 2018;14(41):1802716. doi: 10.1002/smll.201802716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang X, Li X, Li Q, Li H, et al. Improved electrochemical performance based on nanostructured SnS2@CoS2–RGO composite anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 2018;10(3):46. doi: 10.1007/s40820-018-0200-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu X, Xiang Y, Li Q, Zheng Q, et al. SnS2-CoS2@C nanocubes as high initial coulombic efficiency and long-life anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta. 2021;387:138525. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nørby P, Overgaard J, Christensen PS, Richter B, et al. (NH4)4Sn2S6·3H2O: crystal structure, thermal decomposition, and precursor for textured thin film. Chem. Mater. 2014;26(15):4494–4504. doi: 10.1021/cm501681r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hu Z, Wang L, Zhang K, Wang J, et al. MoS2 nanoflowers with expanded interlayers as high-performance anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53(47):12794–12798. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Huang S, Wang M, Jia P, Wang B, et al. N-graphene motivated SnO2@SnS2 heterostructure quantum dots for high performance lithium/sodium storage. Energy Storage Mater. 2019;20:225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yang Y, Yang X-A, Leng D, Wang S-B, et al. Fabrication of g-C3N4/SnS2/SnO2 nanocomposites for promoting photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) under visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;335:491–500. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang S, Gong F, Yang S, Liao J, et al. Graphene oxide-template controlled cuboid-shaped high-capacity VS4 nanoparticles as anode for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018;28(34):1801806. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201801806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li S, Ge P, Jiang F, Shuai H, et al. The advance of nickel-cobalt-sulfide as ultra-fast/high sodium storage materials: the influences of morphology structure, phase evolution and interface property. Energy Storage Mater. 2019;16:267–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li Y, Zhang R, Zhou W, Wu X, et al. Hierarchical MoS2 hollow architectures with abundant mo vacancies for efficient sodium storage. ACS Nano. 2019;13(5):5533–5540. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen J, Mohrhusen L, Ali G, Li S, et al. Electrochemical mechanism investigation of Cu2MoS4 hollow nanospheres for fast and stable sodium ion storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29(7):1807753. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807753. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fang G, Wang Q, Zhou J, Lei Y, et al. Metal organic framework-templated synthesis of bimetallic selenides with rich phase boundaries for sodium-ion storage and oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Nano. 2019;13(5):5635–5645. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ali Z, Tang T, Huang X, Wang Y, et al. Cobalt selenide decorated carbon spheres for excellent cycling performance of sodium ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2018;13:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jiang Y, Zou G, Hou H, Li J, et al. Composition engineering boosts voltage windows for advanced sodium-ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2019;13(9):10787–10797. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fang G, Wu Z, Zhou J, Zhu C, et al. Observation of pseudocapacitive effect and fast ion diffusion in bimetallic sulfides as an advanced sodium-ion battery anode. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018;8(19):1703155. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201703155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hadouchi M, Yaqoob N, Kaghazchi P, Tang M, et al. Fast sodium intercalation in Na3.41£0.59FeV(PO4)3: a novel sodium-deficient nasicon cathode for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021;35:192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang J, Liu Y, Zhao X, He L, et al. A novel NASICON-type Na4MnCr(PO4)3 demonstrating the energy density record of phosphate cathodes for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020;32(11):1906348. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang J, Polleux J, Lim J, Dunn B. Pseudocapacitive contributions to electrochemical energy storage in TiO2 (anatase) nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007;111(40):14925–14931. doi: 10.1021/jp074464w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.An C, Yuan Y, Zhang B, Tang L, et al. Graphene wrapped FeSe2 nano-microspheres with high pseudocapacitive contribution for enhanced Na-ion storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019;9(18):1900356. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tang Y, Li X, Lv H, Wang W, et al. High-energy aqueous magnesium hybrid full batteries enabled by carrier-hosting potential compensation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;133(10):5503–5512. doi: 10.1002/anie.202013315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu X, Zhang K, Lei K, Li F, et al. Facile synthesis and electrochemical sodium storage of CoS2 micro/nano-structures. Nano Res. 2016;9(1):198–206. doi: 10.1007/s12274-016-0981-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang K, Hu Z, Liu X, Tao Z, et al. FeSe2 microspheres as a high-performance anode material for na-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2015;27(21):3305–3309. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liang L, Xu Y, Wang C, Wen L, et al. Large-scale highly ordered sb nanorod array anodes with high capacity and rate capability for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8(10):2954–2962. doi: 10.1039/C5EE00878F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xue P, Wang N, Fang Z, Lu Z, et al. Rayleigh-instability-induced bismuth nanorod@nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes as a long cycling and high rate anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Lett. 2019;19(3):1998–2004. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang N, Bai Z, Qian Y, Yang J. Double-walled Sb@TiO2−x nanotubes as a superior high-rate and ultralong-lifespan anode material for Na-ion and Li-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2016;28(21):4126–4133. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pan J, Chen S, Fu Q, Sun Y, et al. Layered-structure sbpo4/reduced graphene oxide: an advanced anode material for sodium ion batteries. ACS Nano. 2018;12(12):12869–12878. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b08065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gui Q, Ba D, Zhao Z, Mao Y, et al. Synergistic coupling of ether electrolyte and 3d electrode enables titanates with extraordinary coulombic efficiency and rate performance for sodium-ion capacitors. Small Methods. 2019;3(2):1800371. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201800371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yuan H, Ma F, Wei X, Lan J-L, et al. Ionic-conducting and robust multilayered solid electrolyte interphases for greatly improved rate and cycling capabilities of sodium ion full cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020;10(37):2001418. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202001418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Nano-Micro Letters are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES