Abstract
Phosphorous-NMR is scarcely employed to evaluate enzyme kinetics of kinase driven monophosphorylations, despite of being a powerful and reliable tool to undoubtedly detect the actual phosphoryl transfer to the targeted substrate. Another advantage is that an external supplementation source of the NMR active isotope is not required, since 31P is highly abundant in nature. Glycerol kinase (GlpK) from E. coli is an exemplary ATP-dependent kinase/phosphotransferase model to illustrate the value and usefulness of a 31P-NMR-based approach to assess the enzymatically driven monophosphorylation of glycerol. Moreover, the described approach offers an alternative to the indirect coupled glycerol kinase enzyme assays. Herein, we provided a real time 31P-NMR-based method customized for the direct assessment of the glycerol kinase enzyme activity.
-
•
Real-time detection for phosphoryl group dynamics in the GlpK driven reaction
-
•
Direct assessment of product formation (glycerol-monophosphate)
-
•
Parallel determination of cosubstrate (ATP) consumption and coproduct (ADP) generation
-
•
Method validation was performed via 31P-NMR for each phosphorylated molecule involved in the reaction in order to assist in the molecular assignments
Keywords: 31P-NMR, Glycerol kinase, Monophosphorylations, Enzymatic reaction, Real-time assessment
Graphical abstract
Specifications table
Subject Area: | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology |
More specific subject area: | Enzymology |
Method name | A 31P-NMR-based approach for assessing phosphoryl transfer |
Name and reference of original method: |
[1] RM Werner, A Johnson, 31P NMR of the pyruvate kinase reaction: An undergraduate experiment in enzyme kinetics, Biochem Mol Biol Educ, 45 (2017) 509–514, doi:10.1002/bmb.21079. [2] JA Walker, JD Friesen, SJ Peters, MA Jones, JA Friesen, Development of a new and reliable assay for choline kinase using 31P NMR, Heliyon, 5 (2019) e02585, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02585. |
Resource availability: | The available data is provided in the text and in the supplementary material related to this article |
Method details
Background
To establish the proposed 31P-NMR-based method and to provide an in-depth illustration of our approach we selected the glycerol kinase enzyme (GlpK) from Escherichia coli, which is a widely characterized kinase/phosphotransferase system [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7]–8]. We performed the reaction without a coupled ATP regeneration system, since the aim was to analyze solely the behavior of the phosphoryl group transfer performed by GlpK.
Glycerol kinase (EC: 2.7.1.30) catalyzes the phosphorylation of glycerol generating glycerol-monophosphate (sn-glycerol 3-phosphate) (Fig. 1) [3]. It exclusively uses ATP as phosphor donor and Mg2+ is essential for the catalytic activity [[3], [4]–5]. Substrate affinity for glycerol and ATP is 1.3 µM and 4 mM, respectively [3–5]. The optimum pH is 9.8 and the optimal reaction temperature is 37 °C [3–5]. In addition to the optimum reaction conditions, the interaction of Mg2+ and ATP in aqueous phase have a significant effect on the kinetic behavior. Such interaction depends on the Mg2+ to ATP molar ratio and results in the generation of Mg-ATP complexes of various physical and chemical features. Consequently, the freely accessible ATP co-substrate for the enzyme is altered, substantially affecting glycerol kinase kinetics [9]. For instance, it has been shown that glycerol kinase from Cellulomonas sp. shows a maximum activity at the optimum Mg2+ to ATP molar ratio of (0.12 – 0.3) and exhibits a two-step kinetic behavior as function of ATP at fixed Mg2+ concentrations. Such behavior correlates with the formation of various Mg2+-ATP complexes that bind to the active site [9]. Thus, for a more comprehensive kinetic characterization of the glycerol kinase under study, Mg2+-ATP complexes at different Mg2+/ATP molar ratios should be considered.
Fig. 1.
Glycerol kinase (GlpK) catalyzed reaction for the natural substrate glycerol. The enzyme employs ATP as cosubstrate and Mg2+ as cofactor to generate glycerol-monophosphate and ADP upon ATP hydrolysis.
The most commonly employed method to follow kinase phosphoryl transfer reactions is via enzymatic coupled assays. The classic continuous coupled-enzyme assay accounts ATP depletion via an ADP-dependent/NADH-dependent enzyme cascade [10]. The main disadvantage of such approach is that it indirectly reports both the ATP consumption and the phosphorylation of the target substrate. In addition, it is not possible to ascertain unspecific ATP hydrolysis due to factors different from effective biocatalytic product formation. In contrast, a 31P-NMR based method is capable to detect directly not only ATP consumption or unspecific hydrolysis, but also, product formation and coproduct generation as well. Such comprehensive detection level confers three control points that correlate among each other since the GlpK driven monophosphorylation of glycerol is equimolar under optimal reaction conditions.
Herein we report a simple 31P-NMR single-tube experiment enabling the real-time assessment of kinase catalyzed monophosphorylations. Our approach is based on the strategies described in the original methods [1] and [2].
This method facilitates reaction dynamics studies for the compounds containing phosphoryl groups involved in the enzymatic reaction.
This approach allows a deep analysis to follow kinetics behavior. Thus, it is also useful for enzyme kinetics characterization and estimation of the equilibrium constant of the reaction under study.
This strategy also allows to investigate correlations in terms of the Mg2+/ATP molar ratio, which is a major factor for developing an efficient biocatalytic process using glycerol kinase.
In addition, once the 31P-NMR landscape of the actual reaction has been defined, it can be possible to introduce an ATP regeneration system into the set-up reaction to profile its influence on the kinase reaction under study.
We can foresee that the application of the present method can be extended to explore the activity of candidate kinase/phosphotransferase enzymes toward targeted non-natural substrates.
Method steps
Reagents and standards
Chemicals used in this work were obtained at the highest purity degree available from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, US).
Glycerol (M = 92.09 g mol−1, Cat. No. G5516)
ATP; adenosine 5′-triphosphate disodium salt (M = 551.14 g mol−1, Cat. No. A2383)
ADP; adenosine 5′-diphosphate disodium salt (M = 427.2 g mol−1, Cat. No. 1905)
Glycerol-monophosphate sodium salt hydrate (M = 172.07 g mol−1, Cat. No. 61,668)
Magnesium chloride anhydrous MgCl2 (M = 95.21 g mol−1, Cat. No. M8266)
Sodium phosphate dibasic Na2HPO4 (M = 141.96 g mol−1, Cat. No. 71,642)
Glycerolkinase (GlpK) from E. coli (0.5 U µL−1, Cat. No. G6278)
NMR conditions
31P-NMR were performed on a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer operating at 202.47 MHz. Spectra were recorded using D2O as solvent.
To enhance signal resolution for the standards and GlpK model reaction, 31P-NMRs were performed using a total of 128 scans at 298.0 K.
To allow rapid measurements during the time-lapse experiment, 31P-NMRs were performed with a total of 16 scans at 305.7 K. The following time intervals were spectra recorded: 0, 12, 30, 40, 48, 116 min.
31P-NMR spectra processing was performed by using the TopSpin© 3.6.2. software (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten; Germany).
31P-NMR-based assessment and validation of GlpK driven monophosphorylation of glycerol
In order to validate the 31P-NMR-based approach to assess glycerol kinase catalyzed monophosphorylations, we perfomed a model GlpK enzymatic reaction. We employed 10 mM of glycerol as substrate and 10 mM of ATP as cosubstrate, 2.5 units of glycerol kinase, 10 mM of magnesium chloride as cofactor, 50 mM ammonium carbonate buffer pH=9 as solvent (prepared in 10% D2O). Reaction volume, temperature, and incubation time were 0.5 mL, 37 °C, and 1 h, respectively. Since the product ATP, ADP, and glycerol-monophosphate are not volatile, reaction was stopped by heating at 95 °C 10 min. The one-hour end-point reaction was analyzed following the described NMR conditions for the GlpK model reaction. The obtained spectra (Fig. 2A) was compared with the standards (Fig. 2B–2E).
Fig. 2.
Experimental validation of the 31P-NMR-based approach for the assessment of glycerol kinase catalyzed monophosphorylations. A, enzymatic reaction employing 10 mM of glycerol as substrate and 10 mM of ATP as cosubstrate, 2.5 units of glycerol kinase, 10 mM of magnesium chloride as cofactor, 50 mM ammonium carbonate buffer pH = 9 as solvent (prepared in 10% D2O). Reaction volume, temperature, and incubation time were 0.5 mL, 37 °C, and 1 h, respectively. B; free phosphate 10 mM, C; glycerol monophosphate 10 mM, D; ADP 10 mM, E; ATP 10 mM. In order to provide the same chemical environment, all standards were solubilized in ammonium carbonate buffer pH = 9 prepared in 10% D2O, containing magnesium chloride 10 mM.
Standards for the establishment of the 31P-NMR landscape
In order to provide the same chemical environment and to simulate the reaction conditions, all standards (final concentration 10 mM) were solubilized in ammonium carbonate buffer pH=9 prepared in 10% D2O, containing magnesium chloride 10 mM. Samples were submitted to analysis following the described NMR conditions for the standards. The obtained spectra were employed to validate the GlpK driven monophosphorylation of glycerol.
Na2HPO4 (31P-NMR spectra is provided in Fig. 2B)
Glycerol-monophosphate (31P-NMR spectra is provided in Fig. 2C)
ADP (31P-NMR spectra is provided in Fig. 2D)
ATP (31P-NMR spectra is provided in Fig. 2E)
31P-NMR single-tube time-lapse experiment
The enzymatic reaction was performed directly in the NMR tube in a 0.5 mL reaction volume, consisting of 50 mM ammonium carbonate buffer pH=9 (prepared in 10% D2O), and equimolar amounts (10 nmol) of each reactant; substrate (glycerol), cosubstrate (ATP), and cofactor (Mg2+). After recording the time 0, the reaction was started by the addition of 2.5 units of enzyme. A representative 31P-NMR spectra stack showing the single-tube time-lapse progress of the GlpK catalyzed reaction at four different times is provided in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Representative 31P-NMR spectra stack showing the single-tube time-lapse progress of the GlpK catalyzed reaction at four different times. The enzymatic reaction was performed employing equimolar amounts (10 nmol) of each reactant in the reaction; substrate (glycerol), cosubstrate (ATP), and cofactor (Mg2+). After recording the time 0, the reaction was started by the addition of 2.5 units of enzyme.
Data processing of the 31P-NMR single-tube time-lapse experiment
A detailed example for the processing of the 31P-NMR integrated spectra obtained at minute 12 for the ATPγ phosphoryl group and glycerol monophosphate is provided, employing Fig. 4. and Eqs. (1)–(4). 31P-NMR integrated spectra obtained at 30, 40, 48, 116 min can be found in the supplementary material section (Fig. S1–S4). A summary for the whole set of processed data is shown in Table 1. Fig. 5 shows the obtained curve for the ATP cosubstrate and the glycerol-monohosphate product after processing the 31P-NMR spectra recorded during the single-tube time-lapse experiment. The detection tendency, over time, for the generated product is shown in the 31P-NMR overlay spectra of the single-tube time-lapse experiment for the product glycerol-monophosphate Fig. 6.
Fig. 4.
31P-NMR integrated spectra recorded at minute 12 of the single-tube time-lapse analysis after starting the reaction. The enzymatic reaction was performed employing equimolar amounts (10 nmol) of each reactant in the reaction; substrate (glycerol), cosubstrate (ATP), and cofactor (Mg2+). The reaction was started by the addition of 2.5 units of enzyme. The assignments are intended to illustrate the ATPγ and glycerol-monophosphate integral values for the data processing.
Table 1.
Summary of data for every 31P-NMR spectra recorded during the single-tube time-lapse experiment. Data were processed using Eqs. (1)–(4), as in the example for the 12 min recorded spectra. 31P-NMR integrated spectra recorded at times 30–116 min are provided in the supplementary material (Figs. S1–S4).
Time (min) | ∫ATPγ | ∫GP | FxATP | FxGP | ATP (nmol) | GP (nmol) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
12 | 1 | 2.31 | 0.3021 | 0.6979 | 15.11 | 34.89 |
30 | 1 | 4.90 | 0.1695 | 0.8305 | 8.47 | 41.53 |
40 | 1 | 4.52 | 0.1812 | 0.8188 | 9.06 | 40.94 |
48 | 1 | 4.85 | 0.1709 | 0.8291 | 8.55 | 41.45 |
116 | 1 | 3.90 | 0.2041 | 0.7959 | 10.20 | 39.80 |
Fig. 5.
Obtained curve for the ATP cosubstrate and the glycerol-monohosphate product after processing the 31P-NMR spectra recorded during the single-tube time-lapse experiment. ATP •, glycerol-monophosphate ♦.
Fig. 6.
31P-NMR overlay spectra of the single-tube time-lapse experiment for the product glycerol-monophosphate. The figure shows the recorded signals for glycerol monophosphate generation at six different times in minutes: 0, blue; 12, black; 30, fuchsia, 40, green; 48, gray; 116, red (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
An additional comprehensive example for the processing of the 31P-NMR integrated spectra obtained at minute 12 for the ATPγ phosphoryl group along with the ADPα phosphoryl group (Fig. S5) is provided in the supplementary material section, as well as Table S1 and chart (Fig. S6) summarizing the obtained results.
The 31P-NMR-based approach enables the detection of all molecules harboring phosphoryl groups involved in the reaction, providing three control points that correlate among each other. We plot the calculated remaining fraction of ATP reported in nmol using the integral values for the product glycerol-monophosphate and for the α-phosphoryl group of the coproduct ADP. The resulting regression analysis shows a high correlation (0.9867) between the two calculated values (Fig. S7). The same correlation behavior was observed when plotting the calculated generated amount in nmol for the product glycerol phosphate and the coproduct ADP (Fig. S8). The correlation analysis is useful to verify our approach based on the assumption that the GlpK driven monophosphorylation of glycerol is equimolar under optimal reaction conditions.
31P-NMR data processing
Assumptions
-
•
Calculations for an equimolar reaction, as it naturally occurs under optimal conditions (see Fig. 1)
-
•
ATPγ integral was set to a relative value of 1 for each separate 31P-NMR spectra recorded during the time-lapse experiment, since it is the phosphoryl group being transferred
Example for data processing, employing the integral values for ATPγ and glycerol-monophosphate at 12 min (Fig. 4).
Eq. (1):
Term definitions:
FxATP = Remaining fraction of the employed ATP in the reaction
∫ATPγ = Integral value of the gamma phosphoryl group of ATP
∫GP = Integral value of the product glycerol phosphate
Replacing values from Fig. 4 in Eq. (1):
Eq. (2):
Term definitions:
FxGP = Fraction of the generated product glycerol-monophosphate
FxATP = Remaining fraction of the employed ATP in the reaction (value calculated in Eq. (1))
Replacing values in Eq. (2):
Eq. (3):
Term definitions: nmol ATP = Remaining cosubstrate ATP employed in the reaction in nmol
FxATP = Remaining fraction of the employed ATP (value calculated in Eq. (1)) nmol ATP used in the reaction = 50 nmol
Replacing values in Eq. (3):
Eq. (4):
Term definitions: nmol GP = Generated product glycerol-monophosphate in the reaction in nmol
FxGP = Fraction of the generated product glycerol-monophosphate (value calculated in Eq. (2)) nmol ATP used in the reaction = 50 nmol
Replacing values in Eq. (4):
Conclusion
Herein we describe a customized version of a robust method for the 31P-NMR-based assessment of glycerol kinase catalyzed monophosphorylations. The established 31P-NMR-based approach is a powerful validated strategy enabling the real-time detection for phosphoryl group dynamics, the direct assessment of product formation, and the parallel determination of cosubstrate consumption and coproduct generation. In addition, this method is also useful to study the influence of Mg2+-ATP complexes during biocatalysis under different complexes scenarios (unsaturated, stoichiometric, over-stoichiometric). The approach illustrated herein is employing glycerol as substrate and glycerol kinase as biocatalyst, for an equimolar reaction. However, the application of the described methodology can be extended to investigate reaction dynamics, kinetic characterization, effect of Mg2+/ATP molar ratio, influence of ATP regeneration systems on kinase activity, and activity assessment of candidate kinase/phosphotransferase systems toward selected non-natural substrates.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 635536 in the course of the project EmPowerPutida 90030134. W. E.-H. specially thanks to the Science and Technology Council of Mexico (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, CONACYT) for the granted financial support.
Footnotes
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101285.
Appendix. Supplementary materials
References
- 1.Werner R.M., Johnson A. 31P NMR of the pyruvate kinase reaction: an undergraduate experiment in enzyme kinetics. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2017;45:509–514. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walker J.A., Friesen J.D., Peters S.J., Jones M.A., Friesen J.A. Development of a new and reliable assay for choline kinase using 31P NMR. Heliyon. 2019;5:e02585. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hayashi S.I., Lin E.C. Purification and properties of glycerol kinase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1967;242:1030–1035. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thorner J.W., Paulus H. Catalytic and allosteric properties of glycerol kinase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1973;248:3922–3932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Novotny M.J., Frederickson W.L., Waygood E.B., Saier M.H. Allosteric regulation of glycerol kinase by enzyme IIIglc of the phosphotransferase system in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 1985;162:810–816. doi: 10.1128/JB.162.2.810-816.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feese M.D., Faber H.R., Bystrom C.E., Pettigrew D.W., Remington S.J. Glycerol kinase from Escherichia coli and an Ala65–>Thr mutant: the crystal structures reveal conformational changes with implications for allosteric regulation. Structure. 1998;6:1407–1418. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00140-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zwaig N., Lin E.C. Feedback inhibition of glycerol kinase, a catabolic enzyme in Escherichia coli. Science. 1966;153:755–757. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3737.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hurley J.H., Faber H.R., Worthylake D., Meadow N.D., Roseman S., Pettigrew D.W., Remington S.J. Structure of the regulatory complex of Escherichia coli IIIGlc with glycerol kinase. Science. 1993;259:673–677. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Molla G.S., Himmelspach A., Wohlgemuth R., Haupt E.T.K., Liese A. Mechanistics and kinetics elucidation of Mg2+/ATP molar ratio effect on glycerol kinase. Mol. Catal. 2018;445:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kornberg A., Pricer W.E. Enzymatic phosphorylation of adenosine and 2,6-diaminopurine riboside. J. Biol. Chem. 1951;193:481–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.