Abstract
Six bacterial strains isolated from root nodules of soybean plants that had been inoculated with root-zone soil of legumes native to Canada were previously characterized and 1) placed in two novel lineages within the genus Bradyrhizobium and 2) assigned to symbiovar septentrionale. Here we verified the taxonomic status of these strains using genomic and phenotypic analyses. Phylogenetic analyses of five protein encoding partial gene sequences as well as 52 full length ribosome protein subunit gene sequences confirmed placement of the novel strains in two highly supported lineages distinct from named Bradyrhizobium species. The highest average nucleotide identity values of strains representing these two lineages relative to type strains of closest relatives were 90.7 and 92.3% which is well below the threshold value for bacterial species circumscription. The genomes of representative strains 1S1T, 162S2 and 66S1MBT have sizes of 10598256, 10733150 and 9032145 bp with DNA G+C contents of 63.5, 63.4 and 63.8 mol%, respectively. These strains possess between one and three plasmids based on copy number of plasmid replication and segregation (repABC) genes. Novel strains also possess numerous insertion sequences, and, relative to reference strain Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110T, exhibit inversion and fragmentation of nodulation (nod) and nitrogen-fixation (nif) gene clusters. Phylogenetic analyses of nodC and nifH gene sequences confirmed placement of novel strains in a distinct lineage corresponding to symbiovar septentrionale. Data for morphological, physiological and symbiotic characteristics complement the sequence-based results. The data presented here support the description of two new species for which the names Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale) and Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale) are proposed, with 1S1T (=LMG 29930T=HAMBI 3676T) and 66S1MBT (=LMG 31547T=HAMBI 3720T) as type strains, respectively.
Keywords: Bradyrhizobium septentrionale (sv. septentrionale), Bradyrhizobium quebecense (sv. septentrionale), insertion sequences, symbiosis genes, genetic rearrangements, Canada
The genus Bradyrhizobium is a large and diverse group of species and includes members that possess accessory genes for nitrogen fixation and symbiotic interaction with legume plants such as soybeans [1, 2].
In a previous study [3] an assessment was made of the diversity and evolutionary relationships of soybean nodulating bacteria associated with legumes native to eastern Canada. Two soybean cultivars were used to selectively trap bacteria from root zone soils of different native legume species and more than 800 bacterial isolates were obtained from root nodules of soybean plants. These bacterial isolates were characterized by multiple locus sequence analysis (MLSA) of five protein encoding core genes and multiple novel lineages of Bradyrhizobium were identified. Bacterial strains representing several of these lineages were assigned to a symbiotic ecotype or symbiovar (sv.) that we named septentrionale (formerly septentrionalis) based on the finding that they possessed unique nodulation (nodC) gene sequences and distinctive symbiotic characteristics.
During the course of the present work we detected high numbers of insertion sequences (small transposable elements, usually less than 3 kb in size) in the genomes of novel strains, a situation similar to that for strains of Bradyrhizobium sp. that possess highly reiterated sequences and were isolated from root nodules of soybeans grown in Japan [4]. Insertion sequences are important because they play a significant role in bacterial evolution by inducing mutations, deletions and rearrangements within the host genome [5].
In the work described here we used phylogenetic, genomic and phenotypic analyses to further characterize strains representing two novel Bradyrhizobium lineages. Based on the results the novel species Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale) and Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale) are proposed.
Habitat and isolation
Novel strains were isolated from root nodules of soybean plants that had been inoculated with suspensions of root-zone soil from the following native legumes growing at woodland sites in the province of Québec, Canada as previously described [3]: Amphicarpaea bracteata (hog-peanut) (site S1, Gatineau, and, site S4, Donnacona); Desmodium canadense (showy tick-trefoil) (site S2, Gatineau); and Apios americana (potato bean) (site S5, Québec). Plants of the native legume species at these sites were vigorous, showed no signs of nitrogen deficiency and the roots were extensively nodulated by resident soil bacteria.
Novel strains 1S1T, 162S2, 75S4 and 28S5 (Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov.) were from root-zone soils of the native legumes at sites S1, S2, S4, and S5, respectively whereas strains 66S1MBT and 12S5 (Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov.) were from root zone soils of the native legumes at sites S1 and site S5, respectively.
Novel strains 1S1T, 162S2 and 66S1MBT were deposited in the BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, University of Ghent, Belgium (LMG collection nos. 29930T, 31550 and 31547T, respectively) and in the HAMBI Microbial Culture Collection, University of Helsinki, Finland (HAMBI collection nos. 3676T, 3724 and 3720T, respectively).
Phylogenetic analyses of partial gene sequences
Sequences of 16S rRNA, atpD, glnII, gyrB, recA and rpoB core genes were used for phylogenetic analyses. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers are shown in Table S1. Alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences was carried out using fast, secondary-structure aware Infernal aligner version 1.1 implemented in the online Ribosomal Database Project version 11.5 [6]. Alignments of protein encoding partial core gene sequences (atpD, glnII, gyrB, recA and rpoB) were performed as previously described [7]. Best fit substitution models were selected using ModelTest-NG [8] implemented in the CIPRES Science Gateway V.3.3 [9]. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were performed using MrBayes version 3.2.1 with default priors [10] as described previously [11]. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses [12] were carried out using 1000 non-parametric bootstrap replications to assess support as detailed previously [7]. In all instances the topologies of trees from Bayesian and ML analyses were similar and therefore only Bayesian trees are shown in this work.
In order to reconstruct a 16S rRNA gene tree of type strains of all named species in the genus Bradyrhizobium (Table S1, available in the online version of this article) it was necessary to trim aligned sequence lengths to 1300 bp. The Bayesian tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. S1) shows that all novel strains (1S1T, 162S2, 75S4 and 28S5; 66S1MBT and 12S5) had identical sequences and were placed in a superclade represented by B. elkanii. It should be noted, however, that the 16S rRNA gene is highly conserved and its usefulness as a taxonomic marker for bacterial species delineation is limited [13, 14].
MLSA of five or more partial core gene sequences is widely used for phylogenetic analysis and delineation of species within the genus Bradyrhizobium [11, 14–16]. The Bayesian tree of five concatenated protein encoding core gene sequences (Fig. 1) shows that type strains representing described species in the genus Bradyrhizobium are grouped into four superclades represented by B. japonicum, B. oligotrophicum, B. jicamae and B. elkanii with all novel strains placed in the superclade represented by B. elkanii. The grouping of Bradyrhizobium reference strains into these four superclades is consistent with the results of other phylogenetic studies of the genus Bradyrhizobium [e.g. 1, 17, 18]. Fig. 1 further shows that the novel strains are placed in two highly supported lineages corresponding to the proposed species (B. septentrionale sp. nov. and B. quebecense sp. nov.) and each of these lineages is distinct from type strains of described Bradyrhizobium species.
Fig. 1.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree (GTR+G+I substitution model) of atpD–glnII–recA–gyrB–rpoB concatenated housekeeping gene sequences for Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov., Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. and reference taxa of the genus Bradyrhizobium. Alignment lengths: atpD, 429 bp; glnII, 519 bp; recA, 417 bp; gyrB, 600 bp; rpoB, 714 bp; total, 2679 bp. Posterior probabilities ≥0.90 are shown. Bar, expected substitutions per site.
As one or more protein encoding core gene sequences of type strains of several Bradyrhizobium species are not available in public databases, a supplementary phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the only two gene sequences (recA and glnII) that are available for all named species. In order to include type strains of all Bradyrhizobium species in the analysis, it was necessary to trim aligned sequence lengths to 411 and 519 bp for the recA and glnII genes, respectively. The Bayesian tree of concatenated recA-glnII gene sequences (Fig. S2) corroborates the placement of novel strains in two lineages that are distinct from named species of the genus Bradyrhizobium.
Data for percentage sequence similarities (16S rRNA gene sequences and five concatenated core gene sequences) of novel strains versus reference taxa, calculated by the method of Stothard [19] (Table S2) are consistent with the phylogenetic data (Figs 1 and S1).
Currently twelve symbiovars have been described in the genus Bradyrhizobium based on distinctive nodulation (nod) gene sequences and symbiotic characteristics. These twelve symbiovars are shown in a Bayesian phylogenetic tree of partial sequences of the nodC gene for novel strains and type strains of named Bradyrhizobium species (Fig. 2). Consistent with our earlier work [3] the nodC tree shows that all novel strains are placed in a distinct and highly supported lineage corresponding to symbiovar septentrionale. A Bayesian tree of partial sequences of the nitrogen fixation (nifH) gene (Fig. S3) exhibits a similar topology to the nodC gene tree (Fig. 2) with the placement of the novel strains in a lineage that is distinct from type strains of Bradyrhizobium species.
Fig. 2.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree (HKY+G substitution model) of nodC gene sequences (426 bp) for Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale), Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale) and reference taxa of the genus Bradyrhizobium. Posterior probabilities ≥0.90 are shown. Bar, expected substitutions per site.
Genomics analyses
The genomes of novel strains 1S1T and 162S2 (Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov.) and strain 66S1MBT (Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov.) were sequenced at the Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Canada, using the Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) Sequel single molecule real-time (SMRT) platform [20].
Table 1 shows genomic characteristics of novel and reference strains. Estimated genome coverage for novel strains was as follows: strain 1S1T: 93-fold with 104918 polymerase reads and an average read length of 11635 bp; strain 162S2 : 97-fold with 116227 polymerase reads and an average read length of 8985 bp; and, strain 66S1MBT: 125-fold with 110353 polymerase reads and an average read length of 10294 bp. The genomes of strains 1S1T, 162S2 and 66S1MBT have sizes of 10598256, 10733150 and 9032145 bp with DNA G+C contents of 63.5, 63.4 and 63.8 mol%, respectively. As the genome assemblies of the novel strains were drafts with between two and four contigs (see Table 1) we estimated the number of plasmids in each strain based on the number of copies of repABC genes encoding proteins involved in plasmid replication and segregation [2, 21]. By this method, the maximum number of plasmids in novel strains was estimated to be between one and three. Further genome analyses (Table 1) using software implemented in ISfinder [22] and ISsaga [23] web-based platform indicated that abundant insertion sequences (IS) are present in the genomes of the three novel strains similar to that reported for plasmid containing and highly reiterated sequence possessing (HRS) strain, Bradyrhizobium sp. NK6, isolated from a soybean root-nodule in Japan [4]. Since mobile genetic elements such as plasmids are considered to be major vectors of IS transmission and IS density is often significantly higher in symbiosis islands (i.e. genomic islands containing symbiosis genes) than in bacterial chromosomes [4, 5, 24, 25], we compared the predicted IS numbers in the genomes of our novel strains with reference strains that were with and without plasmids and symbiosis islands. The data in Table 1 show an apparent relationship between predicted IS numbers and the presence of symbiosis islands and plasmids in the genomes of tested strains: high numbers of ISs (range 384–622) were predicted in novel strains 1S1T, 162S2, 66S1MBT and HRS reference strain Bradyrhizobium sp. NK6 [4] possessing symbiosis islands and one or more plasmids whereas fewer ISs (69 and 104) were detected in strains B. japonicum USDA6T [25] and B. diazoefficiens USDA110T [24] that possess symbiosis islands but lack plasmids. Reference strains B. symbiodeficiens 85S1MBT [26], B. amphicarpaeae 39S1MBT [27], and, B. cosmicum 58S1T and S23321 [18] lacking both symbiosis islands and plasmids contained the fewest ISs (range 5–15) whereas between 41 and 134 ISs were detected in Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 [28], Bradyrhizobium sp. BTAi1 [29] and B. betae PL7HGT [30, 31] each possessing a single plasmid but lacking symbiosis islands.
Table 1.
Characteristics of genome sequences of Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov., 1S1T and 162S2, Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov., 66S1MBT and reference strains Bradyrhizobium sp. NK6, Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T, Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 6T, Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9, Bradyrhizobium sp. BTAi1, Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T, Bradyrhizobium cosmicum 58S1T and S23321, Bradyrhizobium amphicarpaeae 39S1MBT and Bradyrhizobium symbiodeficiens 85S1MBT
Unless otherwise stated, data are from NCBI annotation databases. na, data not available.
|
Characteristic |
Strain |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1S1T |
162S2 |
66S1MBT |
NK6 |
USDA110T |
USDA6T |
DOA9 |
BTAi1 |
PL7HGT |
58S1T |
39S1MBT |
85S1MBT |
||
|
Genome assembly quality (no. contigs) |
Draft (2)* |
Draft (4)* |
Draft (4)* |
Complete |
Complete |
Complete |
Draft (6) |
Complete |
Complete |
Complete |
Complete |
Complete |
Complete |
|
Genome size |
10598256 |
10733150 |
9032145 |
10475157 |
9105828 |
9207384 |
7850549 |
8493513 |
7419402 |
7304136 |
7231841 |
7044517 |
7039503 |
|
Symbiosis island/s |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
Plasmids (repABC copies)† |
(2) |
(3) |
(1) |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1‡ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Predicted insertion sequences§ |
622 |
552 |
384 |
560|| |
104|| |
69|| |
134 |
88 |
41 |
6 |
5 |
15 |
7 |
|
G+C content |
63.5 |
63.4 |
63.8 |
61.1 |
64.1 |
63.7 |
64.4¶ |
64.8 |
64.8 |
64.3 |
64.3 |
64.7 |
64.3 |
|
Genes (total) |
10008 |
10125 |
8490 |
10036 |
8506 |
8681 |
7273¶ |
7673 |
7107 |
6930 |
6854 |
6576 |
6603 |
|
tRNAs |
63 |
63 |
50 |
56 |
53 |
56 |
50¶ |
52 |
47 |
48 |
47 |
50 |
52 |
|
Pseudogenes (total) |
711 |
726 |
434 |
1327 |
325 |
357 |
na |
141 |
233 |
69 |
39 |
38 |
95 |
*Contigs size (bp): strain 1S1T: 9800512 and 797744; strain 162S2: 9880962, 440548, 332795 and 78845; strain 66S1MBT: 8740813, 200394, 50146 and 40792.
†Values in parentheses represent the estimated maximum number of plasmids based on repABC gene copies.
‡Plasmid contains symbiosis genes [28].
||Data from Iida et al. [4].
¶Data from Okazaki et al. [28].
IS transposition and the related activities of deletion and rearrangement may contribute to pseudogenization in the bacterial host genome [5]. In this connection it is of interest to note that the data in Table 1 also show an apparent relationship between predicted IS numbers and total pseudogenes in the genomes of novel and reference strains.
Analyses were carried out using Geneious Prime version 2020.1.1 software to compare the organization of the nodulation (nod and nol) and nitrogen fixation (nif and fix) genes in the genome sequences of novel strains 1S1T (sv. septentrionale) and 66S1MBT (sv. septentrionale) with the corresponding genes in the symbiosis island region of reference strain B. diazoefficiens USDA110T (sv. glycinearum) [24]. The results (Fig. 3) show an identical organization of key nod and nif genes in the genomes of the two novel strains assigned to symbiovar septentrionale. However, the nodY and nolMNZ genes present in the genome sequence of strain USDA 110T were not detected in the genomes of novel strains 1S1T and 66S1MBT, an observation that is consistent with a report by Passaglia [32] indicating that several strains of B. elkanii lack nodY and nolMN genes. Moreover, the nod gene cluster in novel strains 1S1T and 66S1MBT has undergone rearrangement and is inverted relative to the corresponding genome sequence of reference strain USDA110T. The entire symbiosis gene region in both novel strains has also been subjected to apparent fragmentation with the inverted gene cluster located more than 5.8 Mbp distant from the nif-fix gene cluster. This contrasts with reference strain USDA110T where key nod and nif genes are located in a single contiguous symbiosis island (symbiosis island A) [4, 24]. Iida et al. [4] reported that ISs may mediate shuffling of the symbiosis island region in the HRS strain Bradyrhizobium sp. NK6. In this connection it is noteworthy that ISs were more abundant in the genomes of strains 1S1T and 66S1MBT than strain USDA110T (Table 1, Fig. 3). These ISs were found to be inserted in intergenic spaces, a configuration that might be expected to be less disruptive for gene functioning than intragenic placement of ISs [33].
Fig. 3.
Comparative organization of nodulation (nod, nol) and nitrogen fixation (nif, fix) gene clusters of Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale) 1S1T, Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale) 66S1MBT and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA110T (sv. glycinearum).
Type III secretion system genes (rhc C1C2 JNQRSTUV) required for symbiotic interaction with legume plants [34] were detected in the symbiosis gene region of both novel strains and reference strain USDA110T (Fig. 3).
Average nucleotide identity (ANI) is recommended to replace DNA–DNA hybridization methods as a genome relatedness index for bacterial species delineation [13, 14, 35, 36]. The MUMmer (ANIm) algorithm implemented in the J-species web server version 3.0.20 [37] was used to estimate ANI values for genome sequences of novel strains 1S1T, 162S2 and 66S1MBT in pair wise comparisons with the genome sequences of type strains of Bradyrhizobium species identified as the ten closest relatives based on the phylogenetic analyses reported in this work. The data in Table 2 shows that ANI values in comparisons with strains 1S1T and 162S2 (B. septentrionale sp. nov.) were at or below 91.4%, and, in comparisons with strain 66S1MBT (B. quebecense sp. nov.) were 92.3% or less. These ANI values are well below the threshold value of ~95% proposed for bacterial species circumscription [13, 35]. In contrast, the ANI value of 99.8% for the comparison of strains 1S1T versus 162S2 is consistent with these strains belonging to the same species.
Table 2.
Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) values for pair-wise comparisons of genome sequences of Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. 66S1MBT and Bradyrhizobium septentrionale 1S1T and 162S2 versus closest relatives
|
Type strain (accession no.) |
ANI (%) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
66S1MBT |
1S1T |
162S2 |
|
Bradyrhizobium quebecense 66S1MBT (JABWSX000000000) |
– |
91.4 |
91.3 |
|
Bradyrhizobium septentrionale 1S1T (JAAOLE000000000) |
91.4 |
– |
99.8 |
|
Bradyrhizobium septentrionale 162S2 (JABXFA000000000) |
91.3 |
99.8 |
– |
|
Bradyrhizobium embrapense CNPSo 2833T (LFIP00000000) |
92.3 |
90.3 |
90.3 |
|
Bradyrhizobium tropiciagri CNPSo 1112T (LFLZ00000000) |
91.3 |
90.3 |
90.4 |
|
Bradyrhizobium uaiense UFLA03-164T (VKHP00000000) |
91.1 |
90.4 |
90.4 |
|
Bradyrhizobium brasilense UFLA03-321T (MPVQ00000000) |
91.1 |
90.7 |
90.7 |
|
Bradyrhizobium mercantei SEMIA 6399T (MKFI00000000) |
91.1 |
90.5 |
90.5 |
|
Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 76T (ARAG00000000) |
91.1 |
90.7 |
90.7 |
|
Bradyrhizobium viridifuturi SEMIA 690T (LGTB00000000) |
91.0 |
90.2 |
90.2 |
|
Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi PAC48T (LFIQ00000000) |
90,9 |
90.6 |
90.6 |
|
Bradyrhizobium ivorense CI-1BT (CAADFC00000000) |
88.4 |
88.6 |
88.6 |
|
Bradyrhizobium macuxiense BR 10303T (LNCU00000000) |
88.0 |
88.0 |
88.0 |
Phylogenomic relationships were investigated using multiple gene sequences that encode bacterial ribosome protein subunits (rps genes) [38]. The Genome Comparator tool in the bacterial domain genome database of the BIGSdb software platform [39] was used to retrieve aligned concatenated sequences of 53 rps genes from the genomes of the three novel strains (1S1T and 162S2, and, 66S1MBT) and from the type strains of 49 Bradyrhizobium species. For several Bradyrhizobium type strains, the rpsU locus was found to be paralogous (i.e. two or more alleles were present) and therefore this locus was excluded from the analysis. A best-fit substitution model was selected using ModelTest-NG [8]. A robust phylogenetic tree of 52 concatenated rps gene sequences (Fig. 4) corroborates our finding that the novel strains are placed in two highly supported lineages distinct from type strains of named Bradyrhizobium species. These two lineages correspond to the proposed species, B. septentrionale sp. nov. and B. quebecense sp. nov. The arrangement of taxa in Fig. 4 also confirms the placement of novel strains 1S1T, 162S2 and 66S1MBT in a superclade represented by B. elkanii USDA 76T.
Fig. 4.
Bayesian phylogenetic tree (GTR+G+I substitution model) inferred from 52 concatenated ribosome protein subunit (rps) gene sequences for strains of Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov., Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. and reference taxa. Alignment length, 22703 bp. Posterior probabilities ≥0.90 are shown. Bar, expected substitutions per site.
Phenotypic characterization
Novel strains 1S1T and 66S1MBT produce colonies that are circular, convex, beige and ~0.1–0.25 mm diameter after 7 days growth at 28 °C on yeast extract-mannitol (YEM) agar medium [7]. Bacterial cells are Gram-stain-negative based on the KOH method of Buck [40]. Produce an alkaline reaction on YEM agar after 21 days growth at 28 °C (Table S3) which is typical of the genus Bradyrhizobium. Cell morphology was investigated using a transmission electron microscope (H-700, Hitachii) as described previously [11]. The results indicate that bacterial cells are rod-shaped with sub-polar flagella (Fig. S4) consistent with characteristics of the genus Bradyrhizobium [41].
Analysis of fatty acids was done using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (midi) version 6.0 and the rtsba6 database as described by Yu et al. [11]. Data for the fatty acid profiles of novel strains 1S1T, 162S2, 75S4, 28S5, 66S1MBT, 12S5 and reference taxa are shown in Table S4. Fatty acids C16:0, C18:1 ω6c/C18:1 ω7c (summed feature 8), C16:1 ω5c, C18:0 and C19:0 cyclo ω8c were common to all novel strains, whereas C18:0 10-methyl TBSA and C19:1 ω6c/ω7c/19cy (summed feature 7) were detected only in novel strain 1S1T. The predominance of fatty acids C16:0 and C18:1 ω6c/C18:1 ω7c (summed feature 8) in all novel strains is a characteristic feature of the genus Bradyrhizobium [42].
Multiple phenotypic tests including carbon source utilization and chemical sensitivity assays were carried out using BIOLOG GEN III MicroPlates (Biolog, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The results (Table S3) show that strains 1S1T and 66S1MBT can be differentiated from one another as well as from type strains of B. brasilense, B. elkanii, B. embrapense, B. ferriligni, B. ivorense, B. mercantei, B. pachyrhizi, B. tropiciagri, B. uaiense and B. viridifuturi on the basis of several of these phenotypic tests.
Plant tests using Leonard jars (three replicate jars, two plants per jar) were carried out as described previously [3] using B. diazoefficiens USDA110T as reference strain. Tests done in this study and in the previous study [3] showed that novel strains 1S1T, 162S2, 75S4, 28S5, 66S1MBT and 12S5 (sv. septentrionale) were able to elicit nodules on the roots of soybean cultivar Glengarry but were ineffective with regard to symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Results of further tests showed that strains 1S1T and 66S1MBT were capable of eliciting nodules on roots of legumes native to east Canada (Amphicarpaea bracteata, and Desmodium glutinosum) but were ineffective for symbiotic nitrogen fixation. In contrast novel strain 1S1T was found to nodulate and exhibit a partially effective nitrogen fixing association with the Canadian native legume, Desmodium canadense [3].
Description of Bradyrhizobium septentrionale sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale)
Bradyrhizobium septentrionale (sep.ten.tri.o.na'le. L. neut. adj. septentrionale of the north, northern). Cells are Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, non-spore-forming rods (approx. 0.80×2.0 µm). Colonies on YEM agar medium are circular, convex, beige, translucent and ~0.1–0.25 mm in diameter after 7 days at 28 °C. Growth occurs at pH 5 but not at pH 10 (optimum ~pH 7.0). Produces an alkaline reaction on YEM agar. No growth at 10 °C or 37 °C (optimal at ~28 °C). Does not grow in the presence of 1% (w/v) NaCl. Predominant fatty acids are C16:0 and C18:1 ω6c/C18:1 ω7c (summed feature 8).
The type strain utilizes 41 carbon sources including dextrin, maltose, gentiobiose, stachyose, melibiose, β-methyl-D-glucoside, d-salicin, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, N-acetyl-β-D-mannosamine, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine, N-acetyl neuraminic acid, d-mannose, d-fructose, d-galactose, 3-methyl glucose, d-fucose, l-fucose, l-rhamnose, inosine, d-aspartic acid, l-arginine, l-aspartic acid and α-keto-butyric acid. Does not utilize 30 carbon sources including d-sorbitol, glycerol, l-alanine, l-pyroglutamic acid, mucic acid, d-saccharic acid, methyl pyruvate, citric acid, l-malic acid, bromo-succinic acid, Tween 40, γ-amino-butryric acid, β-hydroxy-d,l-butyric acid, propionic acid and formic acid.
The type strain is resistant to tetrazolium violet, tetrazolium blue, nalidixic acid, lithium chloride, potassium tellurite, aztreonam, sodium butyrate and sodium bromate. Susceptible to 1% sodium lactate, fusidic acid, d-serine, troleandomycin, rifamycin SV, minocycline, lincomycin, guanidine HCl and Niaproof 4.
Elicits root nodules (ineffective for nitrogen fixation) on Glycine max, Amphicarpaea bracteata, and Desmodium glutinosum; elicits nodules (partially effective for nitrogen fixation) on roots of Desmodium canadense. The genome of the type strain contains key nodulation, nitrogen-fixation and type III secretion system genes as well as abundant insertion sequences. The type strain, 1S1T (=LMG 29930T=HAMBI 3676T) was isolated from a root nodule of a soybean plant that was inoculated with root-zone soil of Amphicarpaea bracteata plants growing in Quebec, Canada. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 63.5 mol% and the genome size is 10.60 Mbp.
GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the whole genome and 16S rRNA, atpD, glnII, recA, gyrB, rpoB, nodC and nifH gene sequences of the type strain are JAAOLE000000000 and KP768787, KP768555, KP768613, KF615049, KP768729, KP768671, KF615620 and KF615667, respectively.
Description of Bradyrhizobium quebecense sp. nov. (sv. septentrionale)
Bradyrhizobium quebecense (que.bec.en′se. N.L. neut. adj. quebecense of or belonging to the province of Quebec, Canada). Cells are Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, non-spore-forming rods. The type strain produces colonies on YEM agar medium that are circular, convex, beige, translucent and ~0.25 mm diameter after 7 days at 28 °C. Growth occurs at pH 5 but not at pH 10 (optimum ~pH 7.0). Produces an alkaline reaction on YEM agar. No growth at 10 °C or 37 °C (optimal at ~28 °C). Does not grow in the presence of 1% (w/v) NaCl. Predominant fatty acids are C16:0 and C18:1 ω6c/C18:1 ω7c (summed feature 8).
The type strain utilizes 19 carbon sources including d-sorbitol, d-mannitol, d-arabitol, myo-inositol, glycerol, d-glucose-6-PO4, d-fructose-6-PO4, pectin, d-galacturonic acid, mucic acid, quinic acid, methyl pyruvate, Tween 40, α-hydroxybutyric acid and acetoacetic acid.
Does not utilize 53 carbon sources including dextrin, maltose, gentiobiose, stachyose, melibiose, d-salicin, d-galactose, l-fucose, l-rhamnose, d-aspartic acid, l-glutamic acid, l-pyroglutamic acid, l-lactic acid, d-malic acid and acetic acid.
The type strain is resistant to troleandomycin, rifamycin SV, minocycline, tetrazolium violet, tetrazolium blue, aztreonam and sodium butyrate. The type strain is susceptible to 1% sodium lactate, fusidic acid, d-serine, lincomycin, guanidine HCl, Niaproof 4, vancomycin, nalidixic acid, lithium chloride, potassium tellurite and sodium bromate.
Elicits root nodules (ineffective for nitrogen fixation) on Glycine max, Amphicarpaea bracteata, and Desmodium glutinosum. The type strain, 66S1MBT (=LMG 31547T=HAMBI 3720T) was isolated from a root nodule of a soybean plant that was inoculated with root-zone soil of Amphicarpaea bracteata plants growing in Quebec, Canada. The genome of the type strain contains key nodulation, nitrogen-fixation and type III secretion system genes as well as abundant insertion sequences. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 63.8 mol% and the genome size is 9.03 Mbp.
GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the whole genome and 16S rRNA, atpD, glnII, recA, gyrB, rpoB, nodC and nifH gene sequences of the type strain are JABWSX000000000 and KP768782, KP768550, KP768608, KF615025, KP768724, KP768666, KF615618 and KF615665, respectively.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
Funding by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (grant no. J-002272) is gratefully acknowledged.
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Keith Hubbard of the Microscopy Centre, AAFC, Ottawa, Canada for preparing electron microscope images and to Keith Jolley, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom for helpful advice on the use of the BIGSdb genome comparator tool for phylogenetic analyses of multiple ribosome protein subunit gene sequences.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ANI, average nucleotide identity; IS, Insertion sequence; ML, maximum-likelihood; MLSA, multilocus sequence analysis; YEM, yeast extract-mannitol.
Four supplementary tables and four supplementary figures are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Avontuur JR, Palmer M, Beukes CW, Chan WY, Coetzee MPA. Genome-informed Bradyrhizobium taxonomy: where to from here? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2019;42:427–439. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2019.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ormeño-Orrillo E, Martínez-Romero E. A genomotaxonomy view of the Bradyrhizobium genus. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1334–1346. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bromfield ESP, Cloutier S, Tambong JT, Tran Thi TV. Soybeans inoculated with root zone soils of Canadian native legumes harbour diverse and novel Bradyrhizobium spp. that possess agricultural potential. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2017;40:447. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Iida T, Itakura M, Anda M, Sugawara M, Isawa T. Symbiosis island shuffling with abundant insertion sequences in the genomes of extra-slow-growing strains of soybean bradyrhizobia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:4143–4154. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00741-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Chandler M. Bacterial insertion sequences: their genomic impact and diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38:865–891. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D633–D642. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tang J, Bromfield ESP, Rodrigue N, Cloutier S, Tambong JT. Microevolution of symbiotic Bradyrhizobium populations associated with soybeans in east North America. Ecol Evol. 2012;2:2943–2961. doi: 10.1002/ece3.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B. ModelTest-NG: A new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:291–294. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. New Orleans, LA: pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Altekar G, Dwarkadas S, Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. Parallel Metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:407–415. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yu X, Cloutier S, Tambong JT, Bromfield ESP. Bradyrhizobium ottawaense sp. nov., a symbiotic nitrogen fixing bacterium from root nodules of soybeans in Canada. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:3202–3207. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.065540-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Lajudie PM, Andrews M, Ardley J, Eardly B, Jumas-Bilak E. Minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of rhizobia and agrobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:1863. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rivas R, Martens M, de Lajudie P, Willems A. Multilocus sequence analysis of the genus Bradyrhizobium . Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009;32:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Parker MA. The spread of Bradyrhizobium lineages across host legume clades: from Abarema to Zygia. Microb Ecol. 2015;69:630–640. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0503-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lindström K, Amsalu AA, Mousavi SA. Evolution and taxonomy of nitrogen-fixing organisms with emphasis on rhizobia. In: de Bruijn F, editor. Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. pp. 21–38. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wasai-Hara S, Minamisawa K, Cloutier S, Bromfield ESP. Strains of Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov., isolated from contrasting habitats in Japan and Canada possess photosynthesis gene clusters with the hallmark of genomic islands. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5063–5074. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stothard P. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques. 2000;28:1102–1104. doi: 10.2144/00286ir01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ardui S. Single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing comes of age: applications and utilities for medical diagnostics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:2159–2168. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pinto U, Pappas K, Winans S. The ABCs of plasmid replication and segregation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:755–765. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D32–D36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Varani AM, Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Charneau V, Chandler M. ISsaga is an ensemble of web-based methods for high throughput identification and semi-automatic annotation of insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R30. :R30. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kaneko T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Minamisawa K, Uchiumi T. Complete Genomic Sequence of Nitrogen-fixing Symbiotic Bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110. DNA Res; 2002. pp. 189–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaneko T, Maita H, Hirakawa H, Uchiike N, Minamisawa K. Complete genome sequence of the soybean symbiont Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain USDA6T. Genes (Basel) 2011;2:763–787. doi: 10.3390/genes2040763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bromfield ESP, Cloutier S, Nguyen HDT. Description and complete genome sequences of Bradyrhizobium symbiodeficiens sp. nov., a non-symbiotic bacterium associated with legumes native to Canada. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:442–449. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bromfield ESP, Cloutier S, Nguyen HDT. Description and complete genome sequence of Bradyrhizobium amphicarpaeae sp. nov., harbouring photosystem and nitrogen-fixation genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:2841–2848. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Okazaki S, Noisangiam R, Okubo T, Kaneko T, Oshima K. Genome analysis of a novel Bradyrhizobium sp. DOA9 carrying a symbiotic plasmid. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117392–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Giraud E, Moulin L, Vallenet D, Barbe V, Cytryn E. Legume symbioses: absence of nod genes in photosynthetic bradyrhizobia. Science. 2007;316:1307–1312. doi: 10.1126/science.1139548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rivas R, Willems A, Palomo JL, García-Benavides P, Mateos PF. Bradyrhizobium betae sp. nov., isolated from roots of Beta vulgaris affected by tumour-like deformations. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:1271–1275. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02971-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cloutier S, Bromfield ESP. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of the widely studied strain Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T reveals the presence of photosynthesis genes and a putative plasmid. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:e01282–19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01282-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Passaglia LMP. Bradyrhizobium elkanii nod regulon: insights through genomic analysis. Genet Mol Biol. 2017;40:703–716. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Plague GR. Intergenic transposable elements are not randomly distributed in bacteria. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:584–590. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Staehelin C, Krishnan HB. Nodulation outer proteins: double-edged swords of symbiotic rhizobia. Biochem J. 2015;470:263–274. doi: 10.1042/BJ20150518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ciufo S, Kannan S, Sharma S, Badretdin A, Clark K. Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:2386–2392. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. Jspeciesws: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jolley KA, Bliss CM, Bennett JS, Bratcher HB, Brehony C. Ribosomal multilocus sequence typing: universal characterization of bacteria from domain to strain. Microbiology (Reading) 2012;158:1005–1015. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.055459-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jolley KA, Maiden MC. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:595. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44:992–993. doi: 10.1128/AEM.44.4.992-993.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Garrity GM, Bell JA. Family VII. Bradyrhizobiaceae fam. nov. In: In Brenner D, Krieg N, Staley J, Garrity G, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 438. edn. p. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tighe SW, de Lajudie P, Dipietro K, Lindström K, Nick G, et al. Analysis of cellular fatty acids and phenotypic relationships of Agrobacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium species using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:787–801. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-2-787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




