Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar 29;159(1):376–377. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.049

Risk Factors for Cirrhosis in Contemporary Hepatology Practices—Findings from Texas Hepatocellular Carcinoma Consortium Cohort

Hashem B El-Serag 4, Fasiha Kanwal 4, Ziding Feng 1, Jorge A Marrero 2, Saira Khaderi 3,4, Amit G Singal 2, Texas Hepatocellular Carcinoma Consortium (THCCC)
PMCID: PMC8375364  NIHMSID: NIHMS1603805  PMID: 32234536

Background

Age-adjusted mortality from cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to increase in the U.S.1, as well as disproportionately affect racial/ethnic minorities. Understanding risk factors for cirrhosis is key to prevention but these have not been well described in contemporary hepatology practices. Several recent shifts may have changed cirrhosis and HCC epidemiology including improved access to highly efficacious hepatitis C virus (HCV) and2 hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatments, increased prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome, and an increase in alcoholic liver disease3.

We examined the distribution of risk factors in the Texas HCC Cohort (THCCC), a racial/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse prospective cohort of cirrhosis patients recruited from five Texas-based Hepatology practices.4 Texas has the highest HCC incidence rates in U.S.5, making it an ideal place to report the distribution of risk factors for cirrhosis overall and in different racial/ethnic subgroups.

Methods

THCCC cohort study was previously4 described. Recruitment of patients with cirrhosis began December 21, 2016 from five institutions in three cities (Houston Veterans Administration and Baylor Clinic in Houston; University of Texas Southwestern and Parkland Hospital in Dallas; and University of Texas San Antonio in San Antonio). Cirrhosis diagnosis was based on liver histology, radiological features, liver elastography, or serum biomarkers. We excluded patients with uncontrolled hepatic decompensation, history of HCC, or current non-hepatic cancer. In addition to data extraction from the electronic medical record, patients completed data collection forms detailing medical history, alcohol and tobacco use and medications.

We analyzed risk factors including HCV infection [active, resolved, none], HBV infection [active, past, none], HIV, alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), metabolic syndrome (diabetes, obesity [BMI>30], dyslipidemia, hypertension) and other risk factors (alcohol drinking, tobacco use) (supplementary Table 1).

We compared cirrhosis risk factors among Hispanics, blacks and non-Hispanic whites. We calculated unadjusted and multivariate odds ratios and accompanying 95% confidence intervals using logistic regression models, where the dependent variables were groups based on race/ethnicity. We also constructed models where the dependent variables were groups based on HCV, NAFLD or ALD. Multivariate models included only variables with p<0.1 in univariate analyses.

Results

We enrolled 1717 participants as of January 30, 2019. The mean age was 60.1±10.1 years, and 582 (33.9%) were women. They included 50.0% non-Hispanic white, 25.9% Hispanics, 21.7% blacks, and 1.4% Asian. Among 445 Hispanics, 20 were born in Central America (4.5%), 8 in South America (1.8%), 5 in the Caribbean (1.1%), 122 in Mexico (27.4%), 282 (63.4%) in the United States, and 8 (1.8%) in other countries. Risk factors, in order of frequency, were resolved HCV (33.1%), alcoholic liver disease (30.6%), NAFLD (23.3%), active HCV (16.1%), and active HBV (2.5%). Diabetes was present in 55.5% of cirrhosis patients with NAFLD compared to 31.8%, 30.2%, and 35.4% of patients with active HCV, active HBV and alcoholic liver disease, respectively.

Hispanics were the youngest group with a mean age at time of diagnosis of 54 years (SD 10) compared with 58 (SD 10) in non-Hispanics. Alcoholic liver disease was the most common risk factor in Hispanics (35.5%), followed by NAFLD (34.2%) and resolved HCV (23.8%). In contrast, 53.6% of blacks had resolved HCV, 30.4% alcoholic liver disease and only 4.8% NAFLD. These 3 risk factors were equally distributed in non-Hispanic whites who also had the lowest proportions of diabetes or alcoholic liver disease (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and risk factors among different ethnic/racial groups. Statistical comparisons are made between Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic, and between Hispanics vs. blacks.

Race/Ethnic Groups Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic Hispanic vs. Black
Variable Subgroups Hispanic or
Latino
N = 445
Black:
N = 371
Non-
Hispanic
White
N = 858
Not Hispanic or
Latino:
N = 1245
Multivariate*
Adjusted Odds Ratio
Multivariate*
P Value
Multivariate*
Adjusted
Odds Ratio
Multivariate*
P Value
Age (years) [20,58] 254 (57.08%) 87 (23.45%) 295 (34.38%) 391 (31.41%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
[58,65] 113 (25.39%) 152 (40.97%) 258 (30.07%) 416 (33.41%) 0.49 (0.36, 0.69) <0.001 0.53 (0.32, 0.86) 0.01
[65,87] 78 (17.53%) 132 (35.58%) 305 (35.55%) 438 (35.18%) 0.41 (0.29, 0.58) <0.001 0.57 (0.33, 0.96) 0.04
HCV Negative 283 (63.6%) 79 (21.29%) 483 (56.29%) 571 (45.86%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Active 56 (12.58%) 92 (24.8%) 126 (14.69%) 218 (17.51%) 1.03 (0.67, 1.57) 0.90 0.55 (0.31, 0.10) 0.05
Resolved 106 (23.82%) 200 (53.91%) 249 (29.02%) 456 (36.63%) 1.17 (0.83, 1.66) 0.37 0.54 (0.33, 0.87) 0.01
HBV Neg/Unknown 407 (91.46%) 231 (62.26%) 734 (85.55%) 969 (77.83%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Past Infection 36 (8.09%) 128 (34.5%) 104 (12.12%) 235 (18.88%) 0.61 (0.39, 0.96) 0.034 0.47 (0.27, 0.79) 0.01
Chronic 2 (0.45%) 12 (3.23%) 20 (2.33%) 41 (3.29%) 0.09 (0.02, 0.43) 0.003 0.11 (0.02, 0.83) 0.03
NAFLD No 293 (65.84%) 353 (95.15%) 637 (74.24%) 999 (80.24%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Yes 152 (34.16%) 18 (4.85%) 221 (25.76%) 246 (19.76%) 1.65 (1.21, 2.26) 0.002 7.43 (3.87, 14.26) <0.001
Alcoholic liver disease No 287 (64.49%) 258 (69.54%) 616 (71.79%) 887 (71.24%) Reference Reference Not included Not included
Yes 158 (35.51%) 113 (30.46%) 242 (28.21%) 358 (28.76%) 1.43 (1.03, 1.99) 0.03 Not included Not included
Diabetes No 221 (49.66%) 215 (57.95%) 544 (63.40%) 767 (61.61%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Yes 224 (50.34%) 156 (42.05%) 314 (36.60%) 478 (38.39%) 1.84 (1.38, 2.45) <0.001 1.42 (0.94, 2.15) 0.09
High Cholesterol No 358 (80.45%) 286 (77.09%) 676 (78.79%) 972 (78.07%) Not included Not included Not included Not included
Yes 87 (19.55%) 85 (22.91%) 182 (21.21%) 273 (21.93%) Not included Not included Not included Not included
BMI Normal 44 (9.89%) 85 (22.91%) 144 (16.78%) 236 (18.96%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Overweight 122 (27.42%) 131 (35.31%) 280 (32.63%) 412 (33.09%) 1.46 (0.91, 2.32) 0.11 1.46 (0.76, 2.80) 0.25
Obese 272 (61.12%) 150 (40.43%) 415 (48.37) 573 (46.02%) 2.41 (1.56, 3.74) <0.001 2.23 (1.20, 4.13) 0.01
High BP No 241 (54.16%) 110 (29.65%) 407 (47.44%) 533 (42.81%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Yes 204 (45.84%) 261 (70.35%) 451 (52.56%) 712 (57.19%) 0.69 (0.52, 0.92) 0.01 0.40 (0.26, 0.60) <0.001
Smoking Never 213 (47.87%) 71 (19.14%) 306 (35.66%) 390 (31.33%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Yes, but quit 155 (34.83%) 158 (42.59%) 349 (40.68%) 505 (40.56%) 0.78 (0.57, 1.08) 0.14 0.83 (0.50, 1.40) 0.49
Yes, currently 64 (14.38%) 133 (35.85%) 179 (20.86%) 315 (25.3%) 0.59 (0.39, 0.88) 0.01 0.50 (0.28, 0.87) 0.02
Alcohol drinking Never/Rarely 141 (31.69%) 64 (17.25%) 260 (30.30%) 335 (26.91%) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Past 247 (55.51%) 212 (57.14%) 460 (53.61%) 675 (54.22%) 1.34 (0.94, 1.90) 0.10 1.17 (0.70, 1.95) 0.54
Current 42 (9.44%) 72 (19.41%) 105 (12.24%) 179 (14.38%) 1.09 (0.65, 1.81) 0.75 0.80 (0.40, 1.6) 0.53

BMI: body mass index, HCV: hepatitis C virus, HBV: hepatitis B virus, NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

After adjusting for differences in demographics and other risk factors, Hispanics had higher odds of having obesity, diabetes, or NAFLD but lower odds of HBV or current smoking than non-Hispanics (Table 1). Blacks were more likely to have active or resolved HCV as well as alcoholic liver disease and tobacco smoking than Hispanics but less likely to have NAFLD. Analyses predicting HCV, NAFLD and ALD (supplementary Table 2), showed that black race was inversely associated with NAFLD, and Hispanic ethnicity was associated with ALD and NAFLD.

Discussion

The most common risk factors of cirrhosis and HCC have shifted from active viral hepatitis to resolved/treated viral hepatitis as well as alcoholic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. However, there are significant racial/ethnic differences in the distribution of risk factors, notably the high prevalence of metabolic syndrome and NAFLD in Hispanics and low prevalence of these risk factors in blacks. Blacks have high prevalence of alcoholic liver disease and heavy alcohol drinking. These findings portend a continued disproportionate burden of chronic liver disease in Hispanics6 and possibly blacks. We excluded patients with decompensated cirrhosis, which affects the generalizability of the findings and opens the study to incidence-prevalence bias related to differential rate of decompensation or death.

Further, the shift from uncommon risk factors that carry a considerable increase risk of cirrhosis and HCC (active HCV, HBV) to more common but weaker risk factors (alcohol, NAFLD) is likely to result in a larger pool of chronic liver disease patients at risk for developing cirrhosis and HCC. However, it may become increasingly difficult to define the highest risk groups in need of interventions or monitoring. There is a clear need for risk stratification tools for cirrhosis and HCC among patients with HCV sustained virological response, adequate HBV suppression7, alcoholic liver disease, and NAFLD8.

Supplementary Material

supplemental table 1

Acknowledgments

Many thanks go to Dr. Laura Beretta (Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, UTMD Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA), and Dr. Nicole Loo (Department of Medicine, Texas Liver Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA; 6Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, UTMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA) for their contributions.

Grant Support:

This work was supported by a Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas grant (RP150587) and in part by the Center for Gastrointestinal Development, Infection and Injury (NIDDK P30 DK 56338) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI U01 CA230997).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Tapper EB, Parikh ND. Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999-2016: observational study. BMJ. 2018;362:k2817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kanwal F, Kramer J, Asch SM, Chayanupatkul M, Cao Y, El-Serag HB. Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(4):996–1005. e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.El-Serag HB. Hospitalizations for Chronic Liver Disease: Time to Intervene at Multiple Levels. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(3):607–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feng Z, Marrero JA, Khaderi S, Singal AG, Kanwal F, Loo N, et al. Design of the Texas Hepatocellular Carcinoma Consortium Cohort Study. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2019;114(3):530–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.White DL, Thrift AP, Kanwal F, Davila J, El-Serag HB. Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in all 50 United States, from 2000 through 2012. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(4):812–20. e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rich NE, Oji S, Mufti AR, Browning JD, Parikh ND, Odewole M, et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Prevalence, Severity, and Outcomes in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hsu Y-C, Yip TC-F, Ho HJ, Wong VW-S, Huang Y-T, El-Serag HB, et al. Development of a scoring system to predict hepatocellular carcinoma in Asians on antivirals for chronic hepatitis B. Journal of Hepatology. 2018;69(2):278–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ampuero J, Pais R, Aller R, Gallego-Duran R, Crespo J, Garcia-Monzon C, et al. Development and Validation of Hepamet Fibrosis Scoring System—a Simple, Non-invasive Test to Identify Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty liver Disease With Advanced Fibrosis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplemental table 1

RESOURCES