Abstract
A Gram-stain-negative, rod and rod-curved shaped motile bacterium designated strain S25T was obtained from benthic sediment collected near the Kubbar Island coral reefs south of Kuwait. Phenotypic analysis revealed that strain S25T was slightly halophilic, mesophilic and facultative anaerobic, fermenting d-glucose, d-ribose, d-mannose, d-mannitol, maltose, fructose, gentiobiose, cellobiose, melibiose, trehalose and sucrose. It was positive for oxidase and indole production and negative for arginine dihydrolase and lysine and ornithine decarboxylases. It contained C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c (summed feature 3), C18 : 1 ω7c (summed feature 8) and C16 : 0 as the major fatty acids. Strain S25T grew optimally at 30 °C and pH 8 in the presence of 3 % (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequences revealed that strain S25T is related to species of the genus Grimontia, having 99.15 % similarity to ‘Grimontia indica’ AK16T, 99.08 % to Grimontia celer 96-237T and 98.66 % to Grimontia marina IMCC 5001T. The DNA G+C content was 48.8 mol% and the full genome analysis for the strain S25T showed that the bacterium has a genome size of 5 158 621 bp and contains 4730 predicted protein-encoding genes. The average nucleotide identity values between the S25T genome and the genomes of its nearest matches ranged between 81.39 and 94.16 %. The strain was distinguishable from the phylogenetically related genera through differences in several phenotypic properties. On the basis of the phenotypic, phylogenetic and genetic data, strain S25T represents a novel species in the genus Grimontia, for which the name Grimontia sedimenti sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of Grimontia sedimenti is S25T (=DSM 28878T=LMG 28315T).
Keywords: Grimontia sedimenti, Kuwait, coral reefs, sediments, Arabian Gulf
Introduction
The sediment around coral reefs is important in the reef biogeochemistry and few papers have been produced investigating the diversity, function and dynamics of coral reef sediment microbes as well as the factors shaping and controlling the microbial assemblage in the reef sediments [1–3]. The heterotrophic bacteria within the sediments have been proved to be key players in both remineralizing organic matter in the reefs and in recycling nutrients that maintain high ecosystem productivity in otherwise nutrient-poor surrounding waters. Vibrionales members are a major part of the sediment microbial assemblage and the majority belongs to the genus Vibrio [2]. In the current study, culturing the bacterial assemblage of the sediment surrounding the Kubbar coral reefs south of Kuwait revealed the presence of various bacterial members including Vibrionales. Isolate S25T was of special interest since it belongs to the genus Grimontia, a relatively newly described genus. A study done by Ruimy et al. [4] to determine the phylogenetic position of Vibrio hollisae with other members of the families Vibrionaceae, Aeromonadaceae and Plesiomonadaceae suggested the novelty of this genus, a matter that was confirmed later on by Thompson et al. [5], who renamed the genus as Grimontia. To date, four species have been described for this genus. The first was Grimontia hollisae [5] isolated from patient stool and it shared a pathogenic gene cluster with Vibrio [6]. The other three species, Grimontia marina [7], ‘Grimontia indica’ [6] and Grimontia celer [8] are all isolated from seawater. Among them, ‘Grimontia indica’ has pathogenesis genes, suggesting that this species has a life cycle involving pathogenic interaction with marine animals.
Isolation and ecology
The taxonomic position of strain S25T, isolated from benthic sediment collected near Kubbar coral reefs on 5 July 2011 (south of Kuwait, North West of the Arabian Gulf; (29° 02′ 53.6″ N, 48° 17′ 23.3″ E) was determined. The seawater salinity, pH, temperature and conductivity were recorded near the sediment at the time of sampling using a Horiba Water Quality Checker. The seawater salinity was 4 %, pH was 8.3, temperature was 30 °C and conductivity reached 60.7 ms cm −1. Culturable bacteria were originally isolated from benthic sediment collected in sterile 15 ml tubes by scuba divers from the upper 10 cm of the seafloor and at 10 m depth. One gram of the homogenized sediment samples was serially diluted with 3 % sterile saline (NaCl) and diluents of 10−1, 10−3 and 10−5 were used in plating. One hundred microlitres of each diluent was inoculated into Zobell marine agar 2216 (ZMA; Himedia) with pH adjusted to 7.6. All plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. The novel isolate S25T was purified and maintained at 30 °C on ZMA. Stocks of the purified culture were preserved as suspensions at Microbank (Prolab Diagnostic) and stored at −80 °C.
Several morphologically distinct single colonies were individually recultured into new media and purified. Isolate S25T developed small colonies that were 1 mm in diameter and circular, entire, raised and non-pigmented after 24 h but after 48 h the colonies were 2 mm in diameter, small, circular, convex, semi-opaque, dull, beige and had entire margins (Fig. S1, available in the online version of this article). In addition, strain S25T was grown on thiosulfate citrate bile sucrose (TCBS; BD Difco) medium and it formed green colonies after 48 h (Fig. S2). For comparison, some of the investigations were performed with G. celer 96-237T (from the BCCM/LMG bacteria collection) as a reference strain, which was cultured and maintained under the same conditions as that used for isolate S25T (Table 1). G. celer 96-237T produced colonies with similar cultural characteristics on marine agar (MA)and TCBS media to that reported for the strain S25T colonies.
Table 1.
Key characteristics that differentiate strain S25T from the reference strains
Strains: 1, S25T; 2, Grimontia celer 96-237T [current study]; 2, ‘Grimontia indica’ AK16T [6]; 3, Grimontia marina IMCC 5001T [7]; 4, Grimontia hollisae ATCC 33564T [5]. +, Positive; w, weak positive; −, negative; nd, not determined.
|
Characteristic |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Growth range with NaCl (%) |
2–8 |
1–9 |
2–6 |
1–8 |
1–6 |
|
Urease |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Aesculin hydrolysis |
w |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
|
Citrate assimilation |
− |
+ |
− |
nd |
− |
|
Nitrate reduction |
+ |
w |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
Gluconate assimilation |
w |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Growth with sole carbon sources: |
|||||
|
d-Galactose |
w |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Trehalose |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Cellobiose |
+ |
− |
− |
nd |
− |
|
G+C content (mol%) |
48.8* |
48.4* |
48.7* |
52.6† |
51† |
*G+C content determined from whole genome sequence.
†G+C content determined by reverse-phase HPLC [14].
Physiology and chemotaxonomy
Cell morphology was determined by phase contrast microscopy (Zeiss Axio) and cell motility was determined by using both the hanging drop technique and flagella staining following the methods of Leifson [9] and Murray et al. [10]. Cells of strain S25T were monotrichous flagellated, rod and curved-rod shaped (Fig. S3). Cells were [average (minimum-maximum) SD] 1 μm (0.7–1.3 μm) 0.22 μm long and 0.33 μm (0.3–0.4 μm) 0.03 μm wide.
Growth of strain S25T was tested under different NaCl concentrations in the range of 0–15 % (w/v), in increments of 1 % using MA [11] and nutrient agar (NA; BD Difco). Growth of the strain was also tested under various temperatures ranging from 5 to 55°C and pH values ranging from pH 4 to 11. The isolate grow successfully at various NaCl concentrations from 2 to 8 % (w/v), temperature ranges between 15 and 40 °C and pH ranges between pH 6 and 10, with optimal growth with 3 % (w/v) NaCl, at 30 °C and at pH 8. The optimal growth conditions for the reference strain G. celer 96-237T using MA were similar to that reported for strain S25T. It is worth mentioning that the reference strain G. celer 96-237T grew with NaCl ranging from 1 to 9 %.
The detailed biochemical characteristics of strain S25T are given in Tables 1 and S1, and in the species description. A series of physiological and biochemical characteristics could distinguish strain S25T from the reference as well as other related genera. The phenotypic characterization was carried out using GEN III MicroPlates (Biolog) and API 20E, API 20NE, API ZYM and API 50CH strips (bioMérieux) following the manufacturers’ instructions. Also, strain S25T was inoculated on MA and incubated at 30 °C inside the Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Anaerobic System for 2 weeks to determine the strain's anaerobic growth ability. In addition, catalase and oxidase activities were determined according to Smibert and Krieg [12].
The major differences between strain S25T and the reference strain G. celer 96-237T and other Grimontoa species are reported in Table 1. Strain S25T showed the ability to grow on various substrates as sole carbon source including cellobiose and trehalose while G. celer 96-237T failed to do so. In addition, strain S25T was urease negative, showing similarity to both G. marina IMCC 5001T and ‘Grimontia indica’ AK16T but opposing the results of the reference strain G. celer 96-237T and G. holliase ATCC 33564T. Also strain S25T was negative for citrate assimilation while the reference strain G. celer 96-237T was positive.
The cellular fatty acid composition of strain S25T was determined by the identification services of Deutche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zelkulturen (DSMZ) in Germany using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (midi) as described by Sasser [13]. The cellular fatty acid of S25T was analysed in culture at the late exponential stage of growth after growing the isolate on MA with 3 % (w/v) NaCl and incubating at 30 °C for 24 h. The major fatty acids were C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c (summed feature 3; 36.2 %), C18 : 1 ω7c (summed feature 8; 21 %) and C16 : 0 (17.4 %) (Table S1). Likewise, analysis of respiratory quinones for the strain S25T was also carried out by the DSMZ. Two ubiquinone were detected: Q7 (1.7 %) and Q8 (98.3 %). The dominant fatty acids and respiratory quinones of strain S25T were similar to those reported by Choi et al. [7] for G. marina IMCC 5001T and G. hollisae KCCM 41680T grown on MA at 30 °C for 48 h, i.e. the same conditions used to analyse the S25T sample, suggesting that this strain indeed belongs to the genus Grimontia.
The G+C content of the strain S25T DNA was 46.5 mol% as determined by reverse-phase HPLC of nucleosides [14], yet the whole genome sequencing results showed that the G+C content of S25T is higher at 48.8 mol%, which is near the G+C content of G. celer 96-237T (48.4 mol%) and ‘Grimontia indica’ AK16T (48.7 %) mentioned elsewhere [6, 8].
16S rRNA gene sequenced based phylogeny
The complete 16S rRNA gene sequence of S25T was determined by direct sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA. Genomic DNA extraction was carried out using the MasterPure Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR-mediated amplification of the 16S rRNA and purification of the PCR product was carried out as described in Rainey et al. [15]. Purified PCR products were sequenced using the CEQ DTCS-Quick Start Kit (Beckmann Coulter) as directed in the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequence reactions were electrophoresed using the CEO 8000 Genetic analysis system.
The length of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain S25T was a continuous stretch of 1451 bp. Comparing the 16S rRNA of strain S25T with corresponding sequences in the GenBank, EMBL and RDP II databases indicated that strain S25T is a member of the phylum Proteobacteria, class Gamma-proteobacteria, order Vibrionales, family Vibrionaceae, genus Grimontia. A comparative analysis was undertaken between the strain S25T 16S rRNA gene sequence and its closely related strains with the following results (similarity %): ‘G. indica’ AK16T (99.15 %), G. celer 96-237T (99.08 %), G. marina IMCC 5001T (98.66 %) and G. hollisae ATCC 33564T (96.03 %).
A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed for strain S25T with its closest relatives. The analysis was performed on the Phylogeny.fr platform [16, 17] and comprised the following steps. All sequences were aligned with ClustalW (version 2.1) [18]. After alignment, ambiguous regions (i.e. containing gaps and/or poorly aligned) were removed with Gblocks (version 0.91b) [19]. The neighbour-joining (NJ) method including bootstrap (1000 times) analysis [20] was implemented in the BioNJ program [21]. Graphical representation and editing of the phylogenetic tree were performed with TreeDyn (version 198.3) [22]. Furthermore, pairwise sequence similarities were calculated using the method recommended by Meier-Kolthoff et al. [23] for the 16S rRNA gene available via the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) web server [24] available at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/. Phylogenies were inferred by the GGDC web server available at http://ggdc.dsmz.de/ using the DSMZ phylogenomics pipeline [25] adapted to single genes. A multiple sequence alignment was created with muscle [26]. Maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony (MP) trees were inferred from the alignment with RAxML [27] and TNT [28], respectively. For the ML tree, rapid bootstrapping in conjunction with the autoMRE bootstopping criterion [29] and subsequent search for the best tree was used; for the MP tree, 1000 bootstrapping replicates were used in conjunction with tree-bisection-and-reconnection branch swapping and 10 random sequence addition replicates. The sequences were checked for a compositional bias using the Χ² test as implemented in PAUP* [30]. The input nucleotide matrix comprised 22 operational taxonomic units and 1577 characters, 250 of which were variable and 181 of which were parsimony-informative. The base-frequency check indicated no compositional bias (P=1.00, α=0.05). ML analysis under the GTR+GAMMA model yielded a highest log likelihood of −5493.54, whereas the estimated alpha parameter was 0.06. The ML bootstrapping converged after 700 replicates; the average support was 70.37 %. MP analysis yielded a best score of 653 (consistency index 0.53, retention index 0.58) and four best trees. The MP bootstrapping average support was 76.32 %.
The phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene showed that strain S25T is part of the clade formed by Grimontia species (Figs 1 and S4) and closer to the marine species than to G. hollisae. The NJ and ML/MP phylogenetic trees suggested that the ancestor of isolate S25T existed before the ancestors of G. marina and ‘G. indica’.
Fig. 1.
16S rRNA gene sequences maximum-likelihood (ML) and maximum-parsimony(MP) tree inferred under the GTR+GAMMA model and rooted by midpoint-rooting. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. The numbers above the branches are support values when larger than 60 % from ML (left) and MP (right) bootstrapping. Sequence length was 1451 bp. The accession numbers of the 16S rRNA genes in the GenBank are shown between brackets. The scale bar denotes the number of substitutions per site.
Genome features and phylogenomic analysis
The whole genome sequence (WGS) of S25T was determined. The DNA was extracted using the PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagents (ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the sample quality check was performed using Qubit DNA BR assay kit and E0gen NGS 0.8 % agarose. The nebnext Fast DNA Library Prep Set for Ion Torrent (Biolabs Inc.) and the kapa Library Quantification Kit were used. The whole genome was sequenced using Ion Torrent, the Ion PI Hi-Q sequencing 200 kit and the Ion PI chip kit version 3 (ThermoFisher Scientific). In total, 6.8 million single reads were produced with an average length of 190 bases. The SPAdes genome assembler version 3.1.0 was used to perform a de novo genome assembly, which yielded 185 contigs where 59 contigs had length greater than 500 bp and an N50 value of 208 501 bp. The longest contig measured 622 561 bp. The full genome analysis for strain S25T showed that the bacterium had a genome size of 5 126 793 bp and contained 4730 predicted protein-encoding genes and 120 RNAs. The authenticity and contamination of the WGS of the strain S25T were checked as indicated by Chun et al. [31] and executed using EZBioCloud Contamination Estimator by 16S (ContEst16S) [32] where the sequences of the 16S rRNA gene from the genome and that of the PCR-determined sequence were compared and found to be identical and the S25T genome was confirmed to be free of contamination. In addition, the S25T genome was analysed using Check M from the Kbase database [33] and the data showed that the percentage of genome contamination was 0.13 % with 100 % gene completeness (Fig. S5).
The genomic relatedness among the type strains of the four published Grimontia species and S25T was determined using in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH). The GGDC provided by DSMZ [24] was used to estimate the DDH values between S25T and ‘G. indica’ AK16T (ANFM02; 55.6 %), G. celer 96-237T (FIZX01; 39.5 %), G. marina IMCC 5001T (FIYY01; 36.1 %) and G. hollisae ATCC 33564T (CP014055/6; 21.65 %). The DDH values produced were below the borderline (threshold 70 %) for same species delimination, which confirmed the novelty of strain S25T as representing a new species under the genus Grimontia. The DDH results were confirmed by the average nucleotide identity (ANI) value calculated using an ANI calculator (EZBioCloud) and following the OrthoANIu algorithm [34] as well as using the Kostas lab ANI calculator to generate ANI figures. The OrthoANIu values (%) between S25T and ‘G. indica’ AK16T (94.1 %), G. celer 96-237T (90.3 %), G. marina IMCC 5001T (88.7 %) and G. hollisae ATCC 33564T (80.8 %) all are less than 95 %, which was confirmed by the Kostas lab ANI calculator results (Fig. S6). Knowing that ANI values of ≥95 % correspond to the transitional 70 % DDH threshold, the current study results shows the novelty of strain S25T [35]. Therefore, the DDH and ANI values support the recognition of strain S25T as representing a new species.
The relatedness of strain S25T to its nearest match from GenBank was also compared at a whole-genome level. The genome sequence data were uploaded to the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS), a free bioinformatics platform available under https://tygs.dsmz.de, for a whole genome-based taxonomic analysis [36]. Determination of closest type strain genomes was done in two complementary ways: First, all user genomes were compared against all type strain genomes available in the TYGS database via the MASH algorithm, a fast approximation of intergenomic relatedness [37], and, the ten type strains with the smallest MASH distances chosen per user genome. Second, an additional set of 10 closely related type strains was determined via the 16S rRNA gene sequences. These were extracted from the user genomes using RNAmmer [38] and each sequence was subsequently blasted [39] against the 16S rRNA gene sequence of each of the currently 13 787 type strains available in the TYGS database. This was used as a proxy to find the best 50 matching type strains (according to the bitscore) for each user genome and to subsequently calculate precise distances using the Genome blast Distance Phylogeny approach (GBDP) under the algorithm 'coverage' and distance formula d5 [24]. These distances were finally used to determine the 10 closest type strain genomes for each of the user genomes. The resulting intergenomic distances were used to infer a balanced minimum-evolution tree with branch support via FastME 2.1.4 including SPR postprocessing [40]. Branch support was inferred from 100 pseudobootstrap replicates each. The trees were rooted at the midpoint [41] and visualized with PhyD3 [42]. The result of the phylogenomic tree clustered strain S25T with the rest of the Grimontia species and showed that it shared a common ancestor with ‘G. indica’ AK16T (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Tree inferred with FastME 2.1.6.1 from GBDP distances calculated from whole genome sequences of the strain S25T and 17 related genomes. The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d5. The numbers above branches are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values >60 % from 100 replications, with an average branch support of 70.1 %. The tree was rooted at the midpoint. The bar equal to 0.03 of the phylogenetic distance. The corresponding genome project numbers are included between brackets.
A more conservative comparative analysis based on RecA, FtsZ and MreB gene sequences extracted from the full genome of strain S25T was executed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database analysis software. NJ phylogenetic trees for each of the compared gene proteins were reconstructed using the Saitou and Nei method [43]. The maximum sequence difference was set at 0.85 the Grishin method was used to calculate distances [44]. Comparing the S25T RecA, FtsZ and MreB housekeeping genes with its nearest match in the GenBank resulted in phylogenetic trees clustering strain S25T with Grimontia species. However, they did not show 100 % similarity to any of the published Grimontia species equivalent housekeeping genes, neither did they show a consistent relationship to the same Grimontia species, as can be concluded from Figs S7–S9.
The functional annotation for the strain S25T genome was achieved by the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server [45–47]. Among the coding sequences, the dominant sequences belonged to conserved regions such as those of metabolic, cellular and regulatory processes. Also sequences belong to stress responses, secondary metabolism and virulence, disease, and defence were detected (Fig. S10). The majority of the genes belonged to carbohydrates>amino acids and derivatives>proteins metabolism>cofactors, vitamins, prosthetic groups and pigments subsystems. The majority of the carbohydrate genes belonged to central carbohydrate metabolism including TCA cycle, pyruvate metabolism and glycolysis followed by fermentation and monosaccharides genes, especially acetyl-COA fermentation to butyrate and monosaccharides catabolism genes. On the other hand, the majority of the amino acid related genes belonged to arginine metabolism, urea cycle and polyamines metabolism, followed by lysine, threonine, methionine, and cysteine biosynthesis and degradation genes. The protein metabolism subsystem was dominated by protein synthesis genes, while the cofactors, vitamins, prosthetic groups and pigments subsystems were dominated by folate and pterines biosynthesis genes, followed by riboflavin genes and biotin genes. The WGS also showed that the strain S25T genome harboured resistance to antibiotic and toxic compounds genes as well as metabolism of aromatic compounds genes in addition to genes related to oxidative, osmotic and heat shock stress. The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARG) in marine microbes was documented by Hatosy and Martiny [48], who described the ocean as a global reservoir for clinically relevant and potentially novel ARG. The Kuwait sea is largely affected by the input of untreated or partially treated sewage, which participates in depositing antibiotics and other pharmaceutical compounds in addition to heavy metals into it [49, 50]. Therefore, it is important to study and investigate the ARG in bacterial isolates thriving in the environment. Kuwait, as an oil-exporting country, releases oil from refineries, ports and oil tankers either accidently or deliberately, which also enriches coral reef systems with aromatic compounds. A previous study by Al-Dahash and Mahmoud [51] suggested that corals in Kuwait can adapt to oil contamination by harbouring oil-degrading bacteria. Also, the heat shock protein-encoding genes may reflect the S25T isolate’s potential ability to survive the fluctuation in temperature between the summer and winter [52]; however, more experimental work is needed to be conducted in order to confirm this assumption.
On the basis of the comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic characteristics, as well as the nearly full genome sequencing, strain S25T should be considered as representing a new species for which we propose the name Grimontia sedimenti sp. nov. The major differences between strain S25T and the reference strain G. celer 96-237T include the range of NaCl tolerance, where G. celer 96-237T is able to grow at wider range of NaCl concentration than S25T. In addition, strain S25T is able to grow on trehalose and cellobiose as a sole carbon source, while G. celer 96-237T is not. Variation was also detected between strain S25T and G. celer 96-237T in urease, gluconate and citrate assimilation, nitrate reduction, and aesculin hydrolysis. Furthermore, DDH and ANI analyses for the WGS clearly differentiated strain S25T from G. celer 96-237T as well as from all other previously described Grimontia species.
Description of Grimontia sedimenti sp. nov.
Grimontia sedimenti (se.di.men’ti. L. gen. n. sedimenti of sediment, from where the type strain was isolated).
Cells are Gram-stain-negative, motile by monotrichous flagella, facultative anaerobic and rod to curved-rod shape. Cells are 0.7–1.3 µm long and 0.3–0.4 µm wide. Colonies on MA are small (1 mm in diameter after 24 h), circular, entire, raised in shape and non-pigmented. After 48 h, colonies are 2 mm in diameter, small, circular, convex, semi-opaque, dull, beige and have entire margins. Growth occurs at 15–40 °C with optimum growth at 30 °C. Growth is observed at pH 6–10 with optimal growth at pH 8. Furthermore, the NaCl range for growth is 2–8 % (optimum, 3 %). The major fatty acids are C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c (summed feature 3), C18 : 1 ω7c (summed feature 3) and C16 : 0. Strain S25T is oxidase-, catalase- and aminopeptidase-positive. Strain S25T is able to reduce nitrate and hydrolyse gelatin but unable to hydrolyse starch and Tween 40. Strain S25T is able to hydrolyse aesculin weakly. In the API 20E and 20NE strips, there is a positive result for β-galactosidase. Positive results are recorded for the assimilation of glucose, mannose, mannitol, N-acetylglucoseamine, maltose, malate and citrate as well as a weak positive result for gluconate assimilation. Strain S25T shows a positive reaction for the Voges–Proskauer test but negative results for arginine dihydrolase, lysine and ornithine decarboxylases, urease and H2S production. Indole is produced from tryptophan. Glucose is fermented with production of acid, as are mannitol and sucrose. In addition to those three carbohydrates, the following carbohydrates are fermented as determined by the API 50CHE kit: d-ribose, d-fructose, d-mannose, N-acetyl-d-glucosamine, maltose, cellobiose, melibiose, trehalose and gentiobiose, as well as d-galactose and inositol weakly. In the API ZYM strip, alkaline phosphatase, leucin arylamidase and N-acetyl-β-glucoseaminidase show strong positive activity (≥40 nmol of hydrolysed substrate), esterase, esterase lipase, acid phosphatase and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase show medium activity (10–20 nmol), while β-galactosidase, α-glucosidase and valine arylamidase are weak positive with 5 nmol hyrolysed substrate .
Isolate S25T is resistant to the following antibiotics (μg disc−1): oxacillin (5), aztreonam (30), vacomycin (30), doxycycline (30), teicoplanin (3 0), bacitracin (10 IU disk−1) and nystatin (100 IU disc−1).
The type strain, S25T, was isolated from benthic sediment collected near the Kubbar Island coral reefs, south of Kuwait, at a depth of 10 m. The DNA G+C content of the strain is 48.8 mol% and the draft genome showed that the bacterium has a genome size of 5 126 793 bp and contains 4730 predicted protein-encoding genes.
The full length 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain S25T is available fromGenBank with accession number MW404042.1. The whole genome sequencing draft genome of strain S25T is available from the GenBank/DDBJ/ENA databases with the accession number JAALDL000000000. The type strain is S25T (=DSM 28878T=LMG 28315T).
Supplementary Data
Funding information
This work was supported by the Research Administration (Kuwait University) grant number SL09/14.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to the Biotechnology Center, Faculty of Science, Kuwait University the general facility project number GS01/02 for providing the sequencing facility (ABI 3031xl Genetic analyser) with special thanks to Ms. Sheela Thankakkon. Thanks are due also to Mr. Abdullah Al-Kanderi the scuba diver for collecting the sediment sample.
Author contributions
Writing–original draft, review and editing: H. M. Investigation: H. M., L. J. and S. E. Formal analysis: H. M. Molecular analysis: H. M. Resources: H. M.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ANI, average nucleotide identity; ARG, antibiotic resistance gene; DDH, DNA–DNA hybridization; GGDC, Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator; MA, marine agar; ML, maximum-likelihood; MP, maximum-parsimony; NA, nutrient agar; NJ, neighbour-joining; TCBS, thiosulfate citrate bile sucrose; WGS, whole genome sequence; ZMA, Zobell marine agar.
Ten supplementary figures and one table are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Hewson I, Fuhrman JA. Spatial and vertical biogeography of coral reef sediment bacterial and diazotroph communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006;306:79–86. doi: 10.3354/meps306079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Uthicke S, McGuire K. Bacterial communities in Great barrier reef calcareous sediments: contrasting 16S rDNA libraries from nearshore and outer shelf reefs. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2007;72:188–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.10.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schöttner S, Pfitzner B, Grünke S, Rasheed M, Wild C, et al. Drivers of bacterial diversity dynamics in permeable carbonate and silicate coral reef sands from the red sea. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:1815–1826. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02494.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ruimy R, Breittmayer V, Elbaze P, Lafay B, Boussemart O, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and assessment of the genera Vibrio, Photobacterium, Aeromonas, and Plesiomonas deduced from small-subunit rRNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:416–426. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-3-416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thompson FL, Hoste B, Vandemeulebroecke K, Swings J. Reclassification of Vibrio hollisae as Grimontia hollisae gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003;53:1615–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02660-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singh A, Vaidya B, Khatri I, Srinivas TNR, Subramanian S, et al. Grimontia indica AK16(T), sp. nov., isolated from a seawater sample reports the presence of pathogenic genes similar to Vibrio genus. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Choi A, Kim K-M, Kang I, Youn S-H, Suh Y-S, et al. Grimontia marina sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from the Yellow Sea. J Microbiol. 2012;50:170–174. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-1615-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pujalte MJ, Lucena T, Rodrigo-Torres L, La Mura A, Ruvira MA, et al. Grimontia celer sp. nov., from sea water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:2906–2909. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leifson E. Staining, shape and arrangement of bacterial flagella. J Bacteriol. 1951;62:377–389. doi: 10.1128/JB.62.4.377-389.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Murray RGE, Doetsch RN, Robinow CF. Light microscopy. In: Gephardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Kreig NR, editors. Methods for General Molecular Bacteriology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Atlas MR. Handbook of Microbiology Media. 3rd ed. USA: CRC press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In: Gephardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Kreig NR, editors. Methods for General Molecular Bacteriology. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE, USA: Microbial ID, Inc.; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the g+ C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1989;39:159–167. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL, Janssen PH, Hippe H, Stackebrandt E. Clostridium paradoxum DSM 7308T contains multiple 16S rRNA genes with heterogeneous intervening sequences. Microbiology. 1996;142:2087–2095. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-8-2087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dereeper A, Audic S, Claverie J-M, Blanc G. BLAST-EXPLORER helps you building datasets for phylogenetic analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:8–6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, et al. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W465–W469. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540–552. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.5 C. Cladistics. 1989;5:164–166. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gascuel O. BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol Biol Evol. 1997;14:685–695. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chevenet F, Brun C, Bañuls A-L, Jacq B, Christen R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:439. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk H-P. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy? Arch Microbiol. 2013;195:413–418. doi: 10.1007/s00203-013-0888-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V, et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci. 2014;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC. Tnt, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 2008;24:774–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol. 2010;17:337–354. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4.0 b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H, SM H, et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:2053–2057. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chan JZ-M, Halachev MR, Loman NJ, Constantinidou C, Pallen MJ. Defining bacterial species in the genomic era: insights from the genus Acinetobacter . BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:302. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 2016;17:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, et al. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:2798–2800. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat. 1972;106:645–668. doi: 10.1086/282802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kreft L, Botzki A, Coppens F, Vandepoele K, Van Bel M. PhyD3: a phylogenetic tree viewer with extended phyloXML support for functional genomics data visualization. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:2946–2947. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grishin NV. Estimation of the number of amino acid substitutions per site when the substitution rate varies among sites. J Mol Evol. 1995;41:675–679. doi: 10.1007/BF00175826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75–5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, et al. The seed and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST) Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8365. doi: 10.1038/srep08365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hatosy SM, Martiny AC. The ocean as a global reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:7593–7599. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00736-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Al-Sarawi HA, Jha AN, Baker-Austin C, Al-Sarawi MA, Lyons BP. Baseline screening for the presence of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolated from Kuwait's marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;129:893–898. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lyons BP, Barber JL, Rumney HS, Bolam TPC, Bersuder P, et al. Baseline survey of marine sediments collected from the state of Kuwait: PAHs, PCBs, brominated flame retardants and metal contamination. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015;100:629–636. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Al-Dahash LM, Mahmoud HM. Harboring oil-degrading bacteria: a potential mechanism of adaptation and survival in corals inhabiting oil-contaminated reefs. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;72:364–374. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Mahmoud H, Jose L. Phage and nucleocytoplasmic large viral sequences dominate coral viromes from the Arabian Gulf. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


