Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Aug 19;10(33):e00726-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00726-21

Bacterial Diversity of Water and Sediment Samples from Gull Point State Park (West Okoboji, Iowa) Determined Using 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing

John A Kyndt a,
Editor: J Cameron Thrashb
PMCID: PMC8375475  PMID: 34410154

ABSTRACT

Gull Point State Park is located on a peninsula on the west shore of West Okoboji Lake (Iowa, USA). It is the primary state park in the Iowa Great Lakes region. Sediment and water samples from three locations at the Gull Point pond were analyzed for their microbial composition.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The Gull Point and West Okoboji Lake landscape was created around 13,000 years ago during the last glacial period, when continental glaciers advanced and retreated (1, 2). Although the Gull Point State Park area is a popular vacation area, the pond that is located closest to West Okoboji Lake is part of a wildlife refuge and less accessed. No studies have been reported on the microbial diversity, and the pond area appears to be suffering from drought (in 2021) and the overgrowth of reed canary grass. To obtain a snapshot of the bacterial composition, samples were collected from three locations in July 2021 (Fig. 1A). At each location, we obtained a surface water sample and a sediment sample (where the pond was about 30 cm deep). The first sampling location was on the north side of the pond, closest to West Okoboji Lake (Gull_A/Gull_A_sed), while the second and third locations were on the east and south sides of the pond (Gull_B/Gull_B_sed and Gull_C/Gull_C_sed) (lat 43°22′16.69″N, long 95°9′41.62″W). Using sterile 15-ml collection tubes, 10-ml water samples and 5-ml sediment samples were collected, stored in a cooler with ice packs for ∼3 h, and transferred to the lab, where they were stored at 4°C for up to 2 days. Total DNA was extracted using the PureLink microbiome DNA purification kit (Invitrogen). Utilizing Qubit and NanoDrop, we determined the quality and quantity of the DNA, yielding A260/280 ratios between 1.60 (Gull_B) and 1.90 (Gull_A_sed). A 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing library was prepared for each sample, following the 16S metagenomic sequencing library preparation protocol (Illumina [3]). Amplicon primers targeting the V3 and V4 regions were synthesized using Sigma (4). The samples were sequenced using a 1.8 pM library with an Illumina MiniSeq sequencer. Paired-end (2 × 150-bp) sequencing generated the following numbers of reads: 373,010 (Gull_A), 452,056 (Gull_A_sed), 151,140 (Gull_B), 654,028 (Gull_B_sed), 371,190 (Gull_C), and 367,450 (Gull_C_sed). The primer sequences were removed, and reads with low-quality scores (average score, <20) were filtered out using the FASTQ Toolkit v2.2.0 within BaseSpace (Illumina). The 16S Metagenomics app v1.0.1 within BaseSpace was used to perform a taxonomic classification, with the Illumina-curated taxonomic database RefSeq RDP 16S v3 (5) and the RDP naïve Bayes taxonomic classification algorithm with an accuracy of >98.2% at the species level (6). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

(A) Map of the sampling locations at Gull Point (West Okoboji Lake, IA, USA). Both the water and sediment samples were taken at three locations, Gull_A, Gull_B, and Gull_C. The maps were obtained from Google Maps. (B) Scatterplot of a principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of the normalized relative abundance of all samples compared at the genus level. The water samples are shown in blue and the sediment samples in black.

In all samples, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria (31 to 66%), with smaller amounts of Bacteroidetes (3 to 15%), Actinobacteria (5 to 19%), and Firmicutes (6 to 11%). Over 72% of the reads were classified to the genus level. A principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) chart was generated within the 16S Metagenomics app, using Classical MDS on a Pearson covariance distance matrix generated from per-sample normalized classification abundance vectors (7, 8). Each sample vector was L1 normalized by multiplying every index by the inverse of the sum of the sample vector. The PCoA comparison of all samples at the genus level showed the three sediment samples to be more similar to each other than to the water samples at each location (Fig. 1B). In general, the sediment samples had a higher representation of Draconibacterium, Thermomarinilinea, and Clostridium sensu stricto, while the water phase samples showed more differentiation, with the following genera most represented: Flavobacterium, Gplla, and Parcubacteria (Gull_A); Mycobacterium and Hydrogenophaga (Gull_B); and Malikia, Vogesella, and Hydrogenophaga (Gull_C). These genera have been found in various environmental samples (918). Few to no typical coliform bacteria were identified, suggesting no significant contamination of the pond.

Data availability.

The 16S rRNA gene amplicon data sets have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA746576 and can be accessed under SRA accession numbers SRR15140834 (Gull_A), SRR15141921 (Gull_A_sed), SRR15141697 (Gull_B), SRR15142125 (Gull_B_sed), SRR15142122 (Gull_C), and SRR15142121 (Gull_C_sed).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was sponsored by the Wilson Enhancement Fund for Applied Research in Science at Bellevue University.

Contributor Information

John A. Kyndt, Email: jkyndt@bellevue.edu.

J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Seigley LS, Quade DJ. 1996. Gull Point State Park: a glacial legacy. Iowa Department of Natural Resources. https://web.archive.org/web/20101229011454/http://www.igsb.uiowa.edu/Browse/gullpt/gullpt.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Iowa Geological Survey. Geology of Iowa State Parks: Gull Point. https://iowageologicalsurvey.org/iowa-state-parks/gull-point-state-park-a-glacial-legacy/.
  • 3.Illumina. 16S metagenomic sequencing library preparation. https://support.illumina.com/documents/documentation/chemistry_documentation/16s/16s-metagenomic-library-prep-guide-15044223-b.pdf.
  • 4.Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. 2013. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM. 2014. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D633–D642. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Illumina. Aggregate PCoA chart. https://support.illumina.com/help/BaseSpace_App_16S_Metagenomics_v110_1000000102601/Content/Source/Informatics/Apps/AggrPCoA_swBS_16S.htm.
  • 8.Wickelmaier F. 2003. An introduction to MDS. http://www.mathpsy.uni-tuebingen.de/wickelmaier/pubs/Wickelmaier2003SQRU.pdf.
  • 9.Du Z-J, Wang Y, Dunlap C, Rooney AP, Chen G-J. 2014. Draconibacterium orientale gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from two distinct marine environments, and proposal of Draconibacteriaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:1690–1696. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.056812-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nunoura T, Hirai M, Miyazaki M, Kazama H, Makita H, Hirayama H, Furushima Y, Yamamoto H, Imachi H, Takai K. 2013. Isolation and characterization of a thermophilic, obligately anaerobic and heterotrophic marine Chloroflexi bacterium from a Chloroflexi-dominated microbial community associated with a Japanese shallow hydrothermal system, and proposal for Thermomarinilinea lacunofontalis gen. nov., sp. nov. Microbes Environ 28:228–235. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me12193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gupta RS, Gao B. 2009. Phylogenomic analyses of clostridia and identification of novel protein signatures that are specific to the genus Clostridium sensu stricto (cluster I). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:285–294. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.001792-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bernardet J-F, Segers P, Vancanneyt M, Berthe F, Kersters K, Vandamme P. 1996. Cutting a Gordian knot: emended classification and description of the genus Flavobacterium, emended description of the family Flavobacteriaceae, and proposal of Flaviobacterium hydatis nom. nov. (basonym, Cytophaga aquatalis Strohl and Tait 1978). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 46:128–148. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-1-128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee CS, Kim M, Lee C, Yu Z, Lee J. 2016. The microbiota of recreational freshwaters and the implications for environmental and public health. Front Microbiol 7:1826. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Harris JK, Kelley ST, Pace NR. 2004. New perspective on uncultured bacterial phylogenetic division OP11. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:845–849. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.845-849.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gupta RS, Lo B, Son J. 2018. Phylogenomics and comparative genomic studies robustly support division of the genus Mycobacterium into an emended genus Mycobacterium and four novel genera. Front Microbiol 9:67. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Willems A, Gillis M. 2015. Hydrogenophaga, p 1–15. In Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P, Rainey FA, Whitman WB (ed), Bergey’s manual of systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ. doi: 10.1002/9781118960608.gbm00947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Spring S, Wagner M, Schumann P, Kämpfer P. 2005. Malikia granosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel polyhydroxyalkanoate- and polyphosphate-accumulating bacterium isolated from activated sludge, and reclassification of Pseudomonas spinosa as Malikia spinosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:621–629. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63356-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sheu S-Y, Chen Y-L, Young C-C, Chen W-M. 2016. Vogesella facilis sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater river, and emended description of the genus Vogesella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:817–823. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA gene amplicon data sets have been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA746576 and can be accessed under SRA accession numbers SRR15140834 (Gull_A), SRR15141921 (Gull_A_sed), SRR15141697 (Gull_B), SRR15142125 (Gull_B_sed), SRR15142122 (Gull_C), and SRR15142121 (Gull_C_sed).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES