Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0254245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254245

Incidence and predictors of mortality among patients with head injury admitted to Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: A retrospective follow-up study

Desalegn Dawit Assele 1,*, Tigabu Addisu Lendado 2, Merid Assefa Awato 2, Shimelash Bitew Workie 3, Wolde Facha Faltamo 3
Editor: Hans-Peter Simmen4
PMCID: PMC8376017  PMID: 34411116

Abstract

Introduction

Head injury is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, especially in resource-limited countries including Ethiopia. However, little is known about the mortality rate and its predictors among these patients in Ethiopia. Thus, the study aims to assess the incidence rate of mortality and its predictors among patients with head injury admitted at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.

Methods

Institutional based retrospective follow-up study was conducted among 1220 randomly selected head injury patients admitted from July 2017 to July 2019. Bivariable and multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to identify the predictors of mortality. Proportionality assumption was tested by a global test based on the Schoenfeld residuals test.

Results

The incidence of the mortality rate was 2.26 (95%CI: 1.9–2.6) per 100-person day observation. The independent predictors of time to death were age above 65 years (AHR:3.49, 95%CI:1.63, 7.48), severe TBI (AHR: 8.8, 95%CI:5.13, 15.0), moderate TBI (AHR:3, 95%CI:1.73,5.31), hypotension (AHR:1.72, 95%CI: 1.11,2.66), hypoxia (AHR:1.92, 95%CI: 1.33,2.76), hyperthermia (AHR:1.8, 95%CI: 1.23,2.63) and hypoglycemic (AHR:1.94, 95%CI: 1.34, 2.81) positively associated with mortality, while underwent neurosurgery was negatively associated with mortality (AHR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11,0.53).

Conclusion

The incidence of mortality rate among head injury patients was high. Older age, moderate and severe TBI, hypotension and hypoxia at admission, neurosurgical procedure, and the episode of hyperthermia and hypoglycemia during hospitalization were the independent predictors of mortality among head injury patients. Therefore, intervention to reduce earlier deaths should focus on the prevention of secondary brain insults.

Introduction

Head injuries are the most common cause of a neurosurgical emergency and continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. It is estimated that 69 million people suffer from Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) from all cases per year [1]. Current estimates suggest that about 4.48 million people lose their lives due to injuries which accounts for 8% of all deaths globally, 38% more than the number of fatalities from malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS combined [2]. Of these, an estimated 2 million deaths were attributed to the TBI [3], and the burden was concentrated in developing countries due to limited access to advanced life-sustaining measures after trauma [4].

In low-and middle-income countries, head injury patients have worse outcomes than patients in high-income countries [5]. Several studies in Africa have found that death rates from head injury range from 4.2% to 35% [69]. Ethiopia is not different from other developing countries; over 20% of head-injured patients die during treatment [10,11]. Evidence suggests that the possible causes for the high mortality rate could be older age, male gender, low GCS, and cause of injuries are likely non-modifiable risk factors and hypoxia, hypotension, hyperthermia, hypo or hyperglycemia, and did not undergo surgery or poor adherence to management guidelines are possible modifiable risk factors [1214].

Clinical presentation of patients and advanced rescue care by emergency teams are crucial factors to determining favorable outcomes. Accordingly, non-surgical management should emphases on rapid transportation, avoiding hypotension and hypoxia, hyperthermia, and medical management to reduce brain swelling [15].

The management of TBI patients should be followed intracranial pressure monitoring is suggested to reduce post-traumatic death in the hospital within two weeks [16]. Unfortunately, in Ethiopia, prehospital care is not well established and hospitals are not well equipped [11]; this can increase the risk of secondary brain injury due to hypotension and hypoxia.

The government of Ethiopia has been striving to attenuate its devastating effects and to meet the sustainable development goal by halving RTIs related death. A previous study in Ethiopia did not address some significant predictors of mortality, and the contribution of censored subjects was not considered in determining predictors of mortality in head-injured patients [17]. This information is crucial for the mitigation of brain injury mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the incidence rate of mortality and its predictors among head injury patients admitted at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital

Methods

Study design and setting

An institutional-based retrospective follow-up study was conducted at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, from August to September 2020. Founds in Hawassa City, 273 Km far south from Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Since 2005, the hospital provides medical, surgical, ICU, and emergency care, out and in-patient service for about 18 million populations from the South region and other neighboring regions within 38 different departments. The hospital has 400 inpatient beds and 8 intensive care beds with 3 functional ventilators. The emergency department of the hospital provides services to 102,033 patients a year. In addition, this unit serves 1800 injured patients a year, including 960 head injuries [18].

Population

All admitted patients presented between July 2017 and July 2019 with a history of head injury and associated impaired consciousness or radiographic evidence of traumatic brain injury. The study population was randomly selected from eligible head trauma patients admitted to HUCSH from July 8, 2017, to July 7, 2019. A total of 1,886 head injury patients was admitted to this hospital between July 8, 2017, and July 7, 2019. All head injury patients admitted to Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital with a complete medical record in the period from July 2017 to July 2019 were included in the study. While incomplete patient records for baseline clinical features (GCS, BP, POS2), the outcome variable and follow-up time of fewer than 24 hours were excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size was calculated based on double population formula by Epi info considering the following assumptions: 95% CI, power 80%, a ratio of unexposed to exposed 1:1, anticipated proportion of mortality rate among patients who did not undergo neurosurgery (unexposed) = 13.7% and AHR = 0.62 [19]. Therefore, the sample size of the exposed group is 610, and for the unexposed group 610, which yields 1220. Stata version 15 was used to generate a random sample. Then, using the subsequent unique number from the database registry, a random sample of 1,220 patients’ cards was selected.

Data collection tools and procedures

The English version data extraction checklist was developed from the literature [5,9,12]. The data were extracted from the patient’s records, electronic database and, operation notes using a data extraction tool for the occurrence of the event. The checklist consists of demographic, injury characteristics, clinical and laboratory findings, and patient management variables. Vital signs and Glasgow Coma Score extraction was started at the time of admission and then following at every 6 hours base. The data were collected by five trained BSc Nurses by using ODK collect.

Data quality management

To ensure the data quality, training was given for the data collectors and the supervisor about the ways of extracting the data based on the study objectives. The tool was also tested and the data were checked for consistency and completeness daily by the supervisor and principal investigator. Reviewed cards were boldly marked to avoid re-review. Data cleaning was checked by codebook for any missing values and data errors.

Definition and operationalization of variables

The primary outcome variable is the death of head injury patients, the time variable is the time to occurrence of death measured from admission to date of the event and coded as one (death), zero for censored. Censoring: right censoring, are these cases like transfer-out, exist with medical advice and lost to follow-up and patients alive at the end of follow-up. The predictor variables assessed were demographic factors (age and sex) and baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory factors (admission GCS, BP, temperature, RBS, HR, oxygenation, and seizure), and neurosurgery, and cause of injury.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI)–is an alteration in brain function which is manifesting as confusion, altered level of consciousness, coma, or seizure temporary or permanent following insult to the brain. Admission GCS was coded into mild (GCS of 13–15), moderate (GCS of 9–12), and severe (GCS of 3–8). Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg measured at any time point during hospitalization, including the hospital arrival value. In pediatrics, hypotension is defined as SBP below the fifth percentile for age. This is estimated using the formula [70 mmHg + (age × 2)] [20,21]. Hypoxia was defined as a pulse oximeter oxygen saturation <90% at any time point during hospitalization, including hospital arrival value. Hyperthermia was defined as a temperature >38°c during hospitalization [22]. Hypoglycemia was defined as a blood glucose concentration level <80mg/dL during hospitalization [22]

Data processing and analysis

Data were collected by using ODK collect version 1.25.2 and then exported to STATA version 15 for analysis. Descriptive statistics including proportions, median, tables, and charts was done to describe the characteristics of the study participants. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve together with the log-rank test was fitted to test for the presence of difference in the incidence of death among the groups. The incidence of the mortality rate was calculated.

Confounding and effect modification was checked by looking at regression coefficient change if greater than or equal to 20% and multi-collinearity was checked using variance inflation factor and value of <10 was used as a cutoff point, indicating no collinearity [23].Variables significant at p-value< 0.2 level in the bivariable analysis were candidates for the final Cox regression analysis to identify the independent predictors of mortality.

Association was summarized by using an adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), and statistical significance tested was done at 95% CI and variables having a p-value less than 0.05 in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was considered as statistically significant. Proportionality assumption was tested by a global test based on Schoenfeld residuals. The goodness of fit of the final model was checked by Nelson–Aalen cumulative hazard function against Cox–Snell residual test [23].

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of the College of Health Sciences and medicine of Wolaita Sodo University, and permission was obtained from Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. As the study was conducted through a review of patient records, no consent was obtained from the patients. Information about specific personal identifiers like the patient names were not collected and the personal informant was kept confidential throughout the study process.

Results

Demographic and injury-related characteristics of patients

A total of 1,220 records of head injury patients was reviewed. Of these, 1159 (95%) charts were included in the analysis, and the remaining 61 (5%) were excluded due to the incompleteness of baseline characteristics and outcome. The majority of patients were male 967 (83.43%). Two-thirds, 716 (61.78%) of patients were between 19 and 40 years, and 51 (4.4%) of patients were above 65 years with a median age of 26 years (IQR: 20–35 years). Road accidents were the leading cause of head injury 708 (60.74%) and followed by assaults 282 (24.33%). A quarter of patients, 297 (25.63%) suffered multiple injuries to the extremities, chest, abdomen, pelvis, or spinal cord. The median time that patients arrived at the hospital after an injury was 6 hours (IQR: 2–20 hours). The overall median length of stay was 3 days (IQR: 2–6) (Table 1)

Table 1. Baseline demographic and injury-related characteristic head injury patients admitted to HUCSH from July 2017- July 2019, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia.

Variables Category Death (N = 148) Censored (N = 1,011) PDO IDR
Sex Male 126(13.03) 841(86.97) 5516 2.28
Female 22(11.46) 170(88.54) 1026 2.14
Age < = 18 27(10.55) 229(89.45) 1655 1.63
19 ─ 40 95(13.27) 621(86.73) 3891 2.44
41─ 64 15(11.03) 121(88.97) 712 2.10
65+ 11(21.57) 40(78.43) 284 3.87
Cause of injury RTI 113(15.96) 595(84.04) 4472 2.52
Fall down 15(9.32) 146(90.68) 739 2.00
Assault 20(6.90) 270(93.10) 1331 1.50
Type of RTI (n = 708) Pedestrian 30(15.63) 162(84.38) 1211 2.47
Motorbike 52(12.65) 359(87.35) 2496 2.08
Car 25(23.81) 80(76.19) 780 3.20
Polytrauma Yes 65(21.89) 232(78.11) 1831 3.54
No 83(9.63) 779(90.37) 4711 1.76

Clinical and radiologic related findings

At admission, the median GCS score was 14 (IQR, 10–15). Seven hundred and sixty-nine patients (66.35%) had sustained mild TBI, a moderate TBI was 237 patients (20.45%), and a severe TBI was 153 patients (13.2%). Patients with a GCS of 3–8 had a mortality rate of 56.86%, as compared with 16.46% for those with a GCS of 12–9 and 2.86% for 13–15. At admission, 59 (5.09%) had hypotensive, 121 (10.4%) had hypoxic, and 96 (9.64%) had anemic. The majority of the patients, 909 (78.43%) had a head CT-scan done and 665 (73.16%) of the patients had an abnormal CT-scan. Of these, 185 (27.82%) were skull fractures and followed by 160, (24.06%), 142 (21.35%) were contusions and epidural hematomas, respectively. Regarding the pupillary light reaction, 98 (8.46%) patients with bilateral non-reactive and 92 (7.94%) had asymmetric pupils (Table 2).

Table 2. Baseline clinical and management related characteristics of head injury patients admitted to HUCSH from July 2017- July 2019, Hawassa, southern Ethiopia.

Variables Category Death (N = 148) Censored (N = 1,011) PDO IDR
Hypotension Absent 114(10.36) 986(89.64) 6144 1.85
Present 34(57.63) 25(42.37) 398 8.54
Hypoxia Absent 83(8.00) 955(92.00) 5644 1.47
Present 65(53.72) 56(46.28) 898 7.23
Anemia (n = 996) Absent 104 (11.56) 796(88.44) 4866 2.13
Present 28(29.17) 68 (70.83) 869 3.22
Admission GCS Mild 22(2.86) 747(97.14) 3642 0.6
Moderate 39(16.46) 195(83.54) 1590 2.45
Severe 87(56.86) 65(43.14) 1310 6.64
Pupillary light reaction Bilateral reactive 52(5.37) 917(94.63) 4987 1.0
Unilateral reactive 37(37.76) 61 (62.24) 813 4.55
Bilateral nonreactive 59(64.13) 33(35.87) 742 7.95
Disposition Emergency 115(12.27) 822(87.73) 4046 2.84
ICU 24(50.00) 24(50.00) 836 2.87
Surgical 8(6.11) 123(93.89) 1174 0.6
Neurosurgical 1(2.33) 42(97.67) 486 0.2
Seizure Present 59(26.58) 163(73.42) 1631 3.61
Absent 89(9.50) 848(90.50) 4911 1.81
Hyperthermia Absent 71(7.11) 927(92.89) 4719 1.5
Present 77(47.83) 84(52.17) 1823 4.22
Hypoglycemia Absent 99(9.57) 936(90.43) 5818 1.7
Present 49(39.52) 75(60.48) 724 6.77
CT-scan (n = 1066) Yes 110(12.10) 799(87.90) 5688 1.93
No 27(17.20) 130(82.80) 564 4.78
CT-scan finding (n = 909) Normal 10(4.10) 234(95.90) 1236 0.8
Abnormal 100(15.04) 565(84.96) 4452 2.24
CT- scan pathology (n = 655) Skull fracture 6(3.24) 179(96.76) 1174 0.5
Epidural hematoma 11(7.75) 131(92.25) 950 1.15
Subdural hematoma 21(26.92) 57(73.08) 488 4.30
SAH 4(40) 6(60.00) 96 4.16
ICH 31(59.62) 21(40.38) 342 9.06
Contusion 18(11.25) 142(88.75) 1184 1.52
DAI 5(22.73) 17(77.27) 154 3.24
Others* 4(25.00) 12(75.00) 64 6.2
Neurosurgery Yes 8(4.44) 172(95.56) 1606 0.49
No 140(14.3) 839(85.70) 4936 2.83
Mannitol Yes 117(31.28) 257(68.72) 2885 4.05
No 31(3.95) 754 (96.05) 3657 0.84
Antiseizure Yes 135 (15.83) 718(84.17) 5142 2.62
No 13(4.25) 293(95.75) 1400 0.92

Abbreviations: ICH: Intracranial hemorrhage, DAI: Diffuse axial injury, SAH: Subarachnoid hemorrhage, GCS: Glasgow Coma Scale, ICU: Intensive care unit. Others

* Pneumocephalus, maxillary and mastoid bone fracture.

Management-related findings

Nine hundred thirty-seven 937 patients (80.85%), 131 (11.30%), 8 (4.4%) and were admitted to the casualty department, surgical ward, intensive care unit (ICU) and assisted by a mechanical ventilator, and neurosurgical ward, respectively. Over a third of the patients, third 374 (32.27) and 853 (73.6%) patients had received mannitol and phenytoin as prophylaxis of antiseizure, respectively. Among the cohort, 180 (15.53%) of the patients had undergone neurosurgery. Seventy-seven (42.78%) of patients underwent a craniotomy to evacuate the acute epidural hematoma and 62 (34.44%) of patients underwent exploratory burr holes. Of the 180 TBI surgeries performed, patients with mild TBI received the highest proportion (126, 70%), followed by patients with moderate TBI (34, 18.89%), and those with severe TBI (20, 11.11%). The mortality rate for all patients who underwent neurosurgery was 4.44% and 14.3% for those without neurosurgery (Table 2).

Incidence of mortality and survival status

A total of 1,159 patients were followed for a minimum of 1 day and a maximum of 96 days, with a median follow-up time of 3 days. During the follow up period, 148[12.7% (95% CI = 10.9–14.8%)] were died, 904 [78% (95%CI = 75.5–80.2)] were cured and discharged, 19 (1.64%) were transferred out to other hospitals, 49 (4.23%) left against medical advice and 39 (3.36%) were lost from the follow-up.

The total time at risk for 1159 was 6,542 person-days of with an incidence rate of 2.26 (95%CI: 1.9–2.6) per 100-person day observation. The cumulative proportion of survival at the end of the first, second, seventh, 14th, and 96th days was 95.9%, 92.1%, 81%, 73%, and 55.6%, respectively (Fig 1). Among patients who died during the follow-up period, 126 (85%) were males, half (50.6%) died within the 48 hours of admission and more than 3/4th died in the casualty department.

Fig 1. Overall Kaplan-Meier estimation of their survival of admitted head injury patients in HUCSH, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia; from July 2017 to July 2019.

Fig 1

The incidence of mortality in patients with severe TBI was 6.64 per 100 person-days it was 2.45 and 0.6 per 100 person-days for moderate and mild TBI, respectively. At three days of follow-up, the probability of survival for those sustained mild, moderate, and severe TBI was 98.1%, 92.5%, and 67.5%, respectively (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival estimate for initial GCS among head injury admitted to HUCSH, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia; from July 2017 to July 2019.

Fig 2

The incidence of mortality was lower among patients who underwent neurosurgery compared to those who did not undergo neurosurgery (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier survival estimate for neurosurgery among head injury admitted to HUCSH, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia; from July 2017 to July 2019.

Fig 3

Kaplan–Meier survival curve together with the log-rank test was fitted to test for the presence of a difference in the occurrence of death among the categorical explanatory variables. There was a high incidence of mortality among patients with hypotension (log-rank test, χ2 84.53), hypoxia (log-rank test, χ2 144.21) and hyperthermia (log-rank test, χ2 100.42) (Table 3)

Table 3. Comparisons of death among different levels of predictor variables using the log-rank test for head injury patients to HUCSH from July 2017–July 2019, Hawassa, southern Ethiopia.

Variables Log-rank (χ2) p-value Variables Log-rank (χ2) p-value
Sex 0.18 0.678 GCS 240.38 < 0.001
Hypotension 84.53 < 0.001 MOI 4.13 0.1267
Hypoxic 144.21 < 0.001 Age 5.42 0.1434
Neurosurgery 22.34 < 0.001 Seizure 27.93 < 0.001
Hypoglycemia 77.65 < 0.001 Hyperthermia 100.42 < 0.001

Predictors of death

In the bivariable analysis of selected baseline clinical and management variables (initial GCS, admission systolic BP< 90 mmHg, oxygen saturation < 90%, and neurosurgery), age, cause of injury, episode of seizure, episode of hypoglycemia, and episode hyperthermia were showed association with time to death at a p-value < 0.2. For clinical significance and control of confounding sex was included in the multivariate analysis. However, in the final multivariable Cox-proportional hazard model; age, initial GCS, admission systolic BP, oxygenation, neurosurgery, cause of injury, episode hypoglycemia, and episode hyperthermia were found to be independent predictors of death.

The risk of death among patients who underwent neurosurgery was 75% (AHR: 0.25; 95% CI; 0.11–0.53) times lower than those who did not undergo neurosurgery. The risk of death among patients with severe and moderate TBI was 8.8 (AHR: 8.8; 95% CI;5.13–15.0) and 3 (AHR:3; 95% CI; 1.73–5.31) higher than those with mild TBI, respectively. The risk of death among patients above 65 years old was 3.48 times (AHR: 3.49; 95% CI;1.63–7.48) higher than those under 18 years.

The risk of death among hypoxic patients was 1.92 (AHR: 1.92;95% CI;1.33–2.76) times higher than those who hadn’t hypoxic. The risk of death among hypotensive patients was 1.72 (AHR:1.72[95% CI; 1.11–2.63]) times higher than those with normotensive. The risk of death among hypoglycemic patients was 1.94 (AHR: 1.94; 95% CI; 1.34–2.81) times higher than those with normoglycemic. The risk of death among hyperthermic patients was 1.8 (AHR: 1.8; 95% CI = 1.23–2.63) times higher than normothermic patients (Table 4).

Table 4. Bivariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for independent predators of time to death among patients with head injury to HUCSH from July 2017- July 2019, Southern Ethiopia.

Variables Category CHR 95%CI AHR 95%CI
Sex Female 1 1
Male 1.01(.70, 1.73) 0.9 (0.56, 1.44)
Age < = 18 1 1
19–40 1.42 (.92, 2.18) 1.56 (0.99, 2.45)
41–64 1.18 (.63, 2.22) 1.35 (0.74, 2.58)
65+ 2.1 (1.04, 4.26) 3.49(1.63, 7.48) *
MOI Fall down 1 1
RTI 1.50(.87, 2.58) 1.12(.63, 1.97)
Assault 0.74 (.37, 1.44) 1.89(.92, 3.86)
Hypotension Absent 1 1
Present 4.9(3.38, 7.31) 1.72(1.11, 2.66) *
Hypoxia Absent 1 1
Present 5.7(4.15, 7.98) 1.92(1.33,2.76) **
Admission GCS Mild 1 1
Moderate 4.5 (2.72, 7.76) 3(1.73, 5.31) **
Severe 16 (10.2, 26.2) 8.8(5.13, 15.0) **
Neurosurgery Yes 0.21 (0.10, 0.43) 0.25(0.11, 0.53) **
No 1 1
Hyperthermia Present 4.6(3.33, 6.46) 1.80(1.23, 2.63) *
Absent 1 1
Hypoglycemia Present 4.07 (2.88, 5.74) 1.94(1.34, 2.81) **
Absent 1 1
Seizure Present 2.3(1.68, 3.27) 1.13(0.79, 1.63)
Absent 1 1

Abbreviations: GCS, Glasgow coma scale, CHR, crude hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; AHR, adjusted hazard ratio, MOI, mechanism of injury

* significant at a value <0.05 level

** significant at a p value<0.001 level.

Assessment of model adequacy

The overall Schoenfeld global test of the full model was checked for proportional hazard (PH) assumption and it was met (p-value = 0.783). All covariates are met the proportional-hazard assumption. Residuals were checked using the goodness-of-fit test by Cox Snell residuals. For the residual test, it was possible to conclude that the final model fits the data well (Fig 4). This figure shows if the Cox regression model fits the data, these residuals should have a standard censored exponential distribution with a hazard ratio. The hazard function follows the 45° line very closely.

Fig 4. Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazard graph against Cox-Snell residual on head injury patients at HUCSH, 2020.

Fig 4

Discussion

This study found that 148 (12.7%) of patients had died in the follow-up period. This mortality rate is comparable to a study done in Rwanda 12.8% [19], the finding was lower than a study done in Iran 16.9% [24], in Nigeria 22.6% [25], and in Tanzania 30.7% [9].

However, the finding is higher than a study done in Tanzania 9% [26], in Rwanda 9.3% [12], and Uganda 9.6% [14]. This high mortality rate could be the result of a lack of prehospital care, scarcity of ventilators and ICU beds, limited surgical capacity, and poor adherence to protocols.

Neurosurgical intervention was found to be a preventive association with mortality. This finding is consistent with other studies [19,27,28], the possible reason could be an evacuation of extra-axial hematoma, which helps to manage increased intracranial pressure, decreased the risk of death and permanent neurologic deficit by preventing secondary brain injury due to herniation of brain [16]. The evidence suggests that timely evacuation of the hematoma has reduced the risk of mortality and length of stay [29]. However, only 20 (11.1%) of severe TBI patients underwent surgery, which might bias the estimate. These may be patients with a lower GCS and advanced age, who are not eligible as neurosurgical candidates. Patients with moderate TBI receiving surgery was shown that the greatest improvement in treatment outcome was followed by mild and severe TBI [27].

The risk of death among patients older than 65 years was higher than those younger than 18 years. This finding is in agreement with other studies [19,30,31], the possible reason could be for these older were more likely to have a low initial GCS, depressed immunity, less likely to adequately respond to the treatment, and increased risk of infection.

The risk of death among patients with severe and moderate TBI were 9 times and 3 times higher hazard of death as compared to mild TBI, respectively. This finding was in agreement with other studies [19,27], the possible reason could be airway impatience, high risk of infection, not a candidate for surgery, and not assisted with a ventilator and poor adherence to management guidelines. Therefore, care providers should implement and adhere to guidelines, that can reduce the risk of mortality and permanent disability [32,33].

The risk of death for hypotensive patients was 1.72 times the increased hazard of death as compared to normotensive patients. This finding is supported by different studies [24,32,34], but in other, hypotension was not a predictor of mortality and neurological outcomes [5]. This could be due to the study period and design, sample size, and algorithm for triage and treatment of trauma patients in the emergency department.

The risk of death among patients with hypoxia had 1.92 times higher as compared with patients without hypoxia. This finding was consistent with the previous studies done in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital [17] and University Teaching Hospital of Kigali [12]. Besides, the risk of dying for a patient who needs mechanical ventilation was 4 times higher than haven’t need for mechanical ventilation [31]. This could be due to the restricted flow of oxygen to the brain, increased metabolic demand, and hypercapnia leads to vasodilatation that could increase an intracranial hemorrhage [35,36].

Accordingly, hypoglycemic patients were 1.94 times higher hazard of death as compared to normoglycemic patients. This finding was in line with the previous study [37], this could be explained by the fact that hypoglycemia leads to deprivation of the brain of its fuel which can lead to compromised brain energy metabolism [35]. Furthermore, the hazard rate of death among patients who were exposed to hyperthermia was 1.8 times higher as compared with normothermic patients. This finding is in agreement with another study [38], this could be since hyperthermia increases brain metabolic demand, ICP, and cell damage [39].

Limitation of the study

The findings of this study might suffer from the fact that it is a retrospective study and based on records; some variables were missing, while the others were not recordable. The study failed to track the deaths that occurred at home and this may underestimate the mortality rate because patients discharged with medical against were at high risk of complications and death. Moreover, since the majority of the observations were censored, there may be a potential bias due to excluded records and the unknown status of absconders.

Conclusion

The incidence of mortality was higher in head injury patients admitted to Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, with half of all deaths occurring 48 hours after admission. Admission GCS, hypotension, hypoxia, age above 65 years, did not undergo neurosurgery, episode of hyperthermia, and hypoglycemia during hospitalization were the independent predictors of mortality.

Recommendations

Care providers give special emphasis should be paid to patients with impatient airways, low GCS, hypoxia, and hypotension at admission, and should follow patients’ vital signs attentively and adhere to management guidelines. The Ministry of Health and stakeholders should improve the capacity of neurosurgical care, improve the critical care capacity and skilled human power are recommended to increase the survival of patients with head injuries. Furthermore, further study using the prospective study design would better compensate for the limitations of this study.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(DTA)

Acknowledgments

We would like to say thanks to Wolalita Sodo University college of health sciences and medicine for facilitating this study. Special thanks go to the medical record office staff at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital for their valuable information. Lastly, our gratitude goes to data collectors for their kind and excellent cooperation during data collection.

Abbreviations

AHR

Adjusted Hazard Ratio

GCS

Glasgow Coma Scale

ICP

Intracranial Pressure

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

TBI

Traumatic Brain Injury

IDR

Incidence density rate

PDO

person day observation

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurosurgery. 2018:1–18. Epub 2018/04/28. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.GBD. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736–88. Epub 11/08. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kamal VK, Agrawal D, Pandey RM. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcomes of traumatic brain injury: Evidences from integrated level 1 trauma center in India. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(4):515–25. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.188637 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Ramirez SS, Hyder AA, Herbert HK, Stevens K. Unintentional Injuries: Magnitude, Prevention, and Control. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33:175–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smart LR, Mangat HS, Issarow B, McClelland P, Mayaya G, Kanumba E, et al. Severe Traumatic Brain Injury at a Tertiary Referral Center in Tanzania: Epidemiology and Adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. World neurosurgery. 2017;105:238–48. Epub 2017/05/27. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.101 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jerome E, Laing GL, Bruce JL, Sartorius B, Brysiewicz P, Clarke DL. An audit of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a busy developing-world trauma service exposes a significant deficit in resources available to manage severe TBI. SAMJ: South African Medical Journal. 2017;107:621–5. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i7.10562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ekeke ON, Okonta KE. Trauma: a major cause of death among surgical inpatients of a Nigerian tertiary hospital. The Pan African medical journal. 2017;28:6. Epub 2017/11/16. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.6.10690; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5681011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tran TM, Fuller AT, Kiryabwire J, Mukasa J, Muhumuza M, Ssenyojo H, et al. Distribution and characteristics of severe traumatic brain injury at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda. World neurosurgery. 2015;83(3):269–77. Epub 2014/12/23. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boniface R, Lugazia ER, Ntungi AM, Kiloloma O. Management and outcome of traumatic brain injury patients at Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The Pan African medical journal. 2017;26:140–. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.26.140.10345 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hunchak C, Teklu S, Meshkat N, Meaney C, Puchalski Ritchie L. Patterns and predictors of early mortality among emergency department patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:605–. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1592-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Aenderl I, Gashaw T, Siebeck M, Mutschler W. Head injury—a neglected public health problem: a four-month prospective study at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014;24(1):27–34. Epub 2014/03/05. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v24i1.4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3929925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krebs E, Gerardo CJ, Park LP, Nickenig Vissoci JR, Byiringiro JC, Byiringiro F, et al. Mortality-Associated Characteristics of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Rwanda. World neurosurgery. 2017;102:571–82. Epub 2017/03/25. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5681277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leo P, McCrea M. Frontiers in Neuroscience Epidemiology. In: Laskowitz D, Grant G, editors. Translational Research in Traumatic Brain Injury. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group (c)2016. by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kuo JB, Vaca DS, Vissoci JRN, Staton AC, Xu L, Muhumuza M, et al. A prospective neurosurgical registry evaluating the clinical care of traumatic brain injury patients presenting to Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda. PLoS One. 2017;12(10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McCafferty RR, Neal CJ, Marshall SA, Pamplin JC, Rivet D, Hood BJ, et al. Neurosurgery and Medical Management of Severe Head Injury. Military medicine. 2018;183(suppl_2):67–72. Epub 2018/09/07. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy071 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carney N., Totten AM., O’Reilly C, Ullman JS., Hawryluk GW., Bell MJ., et al. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):6–15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Landes M, Venugopal R, Berman S, Heffernan S, Maskalyk J, Azazh A. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcomes of head injured patients in an Ethiopian emergency centre. African journal of emergency medicine: Revue africaine de la medecine d’urgence. 2017;7(3):130–4. Epub 2017/09/01. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.04.001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6234141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Duko B, Tadesse F, Oltaye Z. Patterns of road traffic injury and potential consequences among patients visiting Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Hawassa, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):186–. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4192-5 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abdelgadir J, Smith E, Punchak M, Nickenig Vissoci JR, Staton C, Muhindo A, et al. Epidemiology and Characteristics of Neurosurgical Conditions at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital. World neurosurgery. 2017;102. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Banker A, Bell C, Gupta-Malhotra M, Samuels J. Blood pressure percentile charts to identify high or low blood pressure in children. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:98–. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0633-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dash HH, Chavali S. Management of traumatic brain injury patients. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(1):12–21. Epub 2018/02/01. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.12 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Henry SM, Al Turki SA, Bowyer MW, Brasel K, Stewart RM, Davis KA, et al. Advanced Trauma Life Support Manual, 10th edition, Chicago, © 2018. by American College of Surgeons. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2008, 2nd Edition. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saadat S, Akbari H, Khorramirouz R, Mofid R, Rahimi-Movaghar. V. Determinants of mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery. 2012;18(3):219–24. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2012.03453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Onwuchekwa R, Echem R. An epidemiologic study of traumatic head injuries in the emergency department of a tertiary health institution. Journal of Medicine in the Tropics. 2018;20(1):24–9. doi: 10.4103/jomt.jomt_28_17 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Staton C, Msilanga D, Kiwango G, Nickenig Vissoci JR, Andrade L, Lester R, et al. A prospective registry evaluating the epidemiology and clinical care of traumatic brain injury patients presenting to a regional referral hospital in Moshi, Tanzania: challenges and the way forward. International journal of injury control and safety promotion. 2015;24:1–9. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2015.1061562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elahi C, Rocha TAH, Da Silva CN, Sakita MF, Ndebea AS, Haglund MM, et al. An evaluation of outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury at a referral hospital in Tanzania: evidence from a survival analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;47. doi: 10.3171/2019.7.FOCUS19316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eaton J, Bilal Hanif A, Mulima G, Kajombo C, Charles A. Outcomes Following Exploratory Burr Holes for Traumatic Brain Injury in a Resource Poor Setting. World neurosurgery. 2017;105:257–64. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim YJ. The Impact of Time from ED Arrival to Surgery on Mortality and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2011;37(4):328–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2010.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bonow RH, Barber J, Temkin NR, Videtta W, Rondina C, Petroni G, et al. The Outcome of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Latin America. World neurosurgery. 2018;111:e82–e90. Epub 2017/12/13. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.171 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5897054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Krishnamoorthy V, Vavilala MS, Mills B, Rowhani-Rahbar A. Demographic and clinical risk factors associated with hospital mortality after isolated severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study. Journal of Intensive Care. 2015;3(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40560-015-0113-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Farahvar A, Gerber LM, Chiu Y-L, Carney N, Hartl R, Ghajar J. Increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring. Journal of neurosurgery. 2012;117:729–34. doi: 10.3171/2012.7.JNS111816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gerber LM, Chiu Y-L, Carney N, Hartl R, Ghajar J. Marked reduction in mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurosurgery. 2013;119:1583–90. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tohme S, Delhumeau C, Zuercher M, Haller G, Walder B. Prehospital risk factors of mortality and impaired consciousness after severe traumatic brain injury: an epidemiological study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2014;22(1). doi: 10.1186/1757-7241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Williams SN, O’Connell PR, Andrew W. McCaskie. Traumatic brain injury: Bailey and Love’s Short Practice of Surgery - 27th Edition© 2018. by Taylor & Francis group. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Greenberg MS. Head truma:Handbook of Neurosurgery. 9th edition: ©Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 2020. p. 858. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu-DeRyke X, Collingridge DS, Orme J, Roller D, Zurasky J, Rhoney DH. Clinical Impact of Early Hyperglycemia During Acute Phase of Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocritical Care. 2009;11(2):151. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9228-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li J, Jiang J-y. Chinese Head Trauma Data Bank: effect of hyperthermia on the outcome of acute head trauma patients. Journal of neurotrauma. 2012;29(1):96–100. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1753 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nyholm L, Howells T, Lewén A, Hillered L, Enblad P. The influence of hyperthermia on intracranial pressure, cerebral oximetry and cerebral metabolism in traumatic brain injury. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;122(3):177–84. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2017.1319440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Hans-Peter Simmen

10 May 2021

PONE-D-21-10673

Incidence and Predictors of Mortality among patients with head injury admitted to Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in southern Ethiopia, 2020

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Assele,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

First of all: Your manuscript is not written in standatd english. Please, get help from a professional native english speaker. Reviewer 1 has contributed many helpful recommendations to improve your manuscript. Follow his instructions.

Please submit your revised manuscript by end of july, 2021. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Hans-Peter Simmen, M.D., Professor of Surgery

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for including your ethics statement: "Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of the College of Health Sciences of Wolaita Sodo University, and permission was obtained from Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. "

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

Once you have amended this/these statement(s) in the Methods section of the manuscript, please add the same text to the “Ethics Statement” field of the submission form (via “Edit Submission”).

For additional information about PLOS ONE ethical requirements for human subjects research, please refer to http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research.

3. PLOS ONE does not copy edit accepted manuscripts (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/criteria-for-publication#loc-5). To that effect, please ensure that your submission is free of typos and grammatical errors.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. Please amend either the title on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the title in the manuscript so that they are identical.

6. Please ensure that you refer to Figures 1-3 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

7. Please upload a copy of Figure 4, to which you refer in your text. If the figure is no longer to be included as part of the submission please remove all reference to it within the text.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I read your work with great interest. At present TBI is one of the most important topics when dealing with trauma-patients all around the world.

Here I have gathered a few general remarks regarding your manuscript:

- When using the term "polytrauma" you do not give the definition used at your institution to classify patients as polytraumatised. Since the definition in use can have relevant influence on the prognosis of the treated patients you should clarify this issue.

- You do not mention the time from trauma to start of treatment of your patients nor do you give the amount of time they suffered from conditions like hypoxaemia, hypothermia etc. - this would be of great importance to put your findings into perspective.

- In your section "Incidence of mortality and survival status" you report on the overall follow-up of all of your patients but do not give the follow-up regarding e.g. different severities of TBI. Such a division into subgroups would greatly improve the relevance of your manuscript.

In this section I also found the following sentence: "(Error! Reference source not found.)". Please clarify!

In the same section you state "patients who had underwent surgery had higher mean survival time when compared to those did not undergone surgery (sic)". But you do not go into detail regarding the underlying pathologies as well as the characteristics of patients receiving operative or conservative treatment. You rightly mention this flaw in your discussion but do not give any further details.

- The allover quality of your manuscript would benefit greatly from proofreading by an english native speaker (as one of many possible examples I would like to mention the use of "causality" in stead of - I suppose - "casualty" in your sections about "Management related findings" and "Incidence of mortality and survival status" or the sentence "The risk of death hyperthermic patients was 1.8 (AHR: 1.8; 95% CI= 1.23– 2.63) times higher than those with normothermic patients (Table 4)." found in your "Assessment of model adequacy").

Only after thorough revisions of your manuscript I would deem it eligible for PLOS ONE.

Reviewer #2: Dear Authors,

thank you very much for submitting for manuscript. Doing research to improve patients' treatment and outcomes especially in the presence of limited resources is very impressive and you have collected a lot of important data on your patients. However I cannot recommend publication of the manuscript in its current form.

- Language of the manuscript needs significant improvement to make it more understandable

- Variables should be shown in a separate table

- Data on follow-up should be added

- Why did you limit the patient sample to 1220 if you had more patients?

- Secondary injury being a major contributor of bad outcomes has long been known.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Hans-Peter Simmen

23 Jun 2021

Incidence and predictors of mortality among patients with head injury admitted to Hawassa University Comprehensive  Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: A retrospective follow-up study

PONE-D-21-10673R1

Dear Dr. Assele,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Hans-Peter Simmen, M.D., Professor of Surgery

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Hans-Peter Simmen

11 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-10673R1

Incidence and predictors of mortality among patients with head injury admitted to Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia: A retrospective follow-up study

Dear Dr. Assele:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Hans-Peter Simmen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (DTA)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Authors response to editor and reviewer comments.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES