Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2021 Aug 19;17(8):e1009710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009710

DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 prevents ONSEN transposon silencing under heat stress

Kosuke Nozawa 1,#, Jiani Chen 2,#, Jianjun Jiang 2,3,#, Sarah M Leichter 2, Masataka Yamada 1, Takamasa Suzuki 4, Fengquan Liu 3, Hidetaka Ito 5,*, Xuehua Zhong 2,*
Editor: Nathan M Springer6
PMCID: PMC8376061  PMID: 34411103

Abstract

DNA methylation plays crucial roles in transposon silencing and genome integrity. CHROMOMETHYLASE3 (CMT3) is a plant-specific DNA methyltransferase responsible for catalyzing DNA methylation at the CHG (H = A, T, C) context. Here, we identified a positive role of CMT3 in heat-induced activation of retrotransposon ONSEN. We found that the full transcription of ONSEN under heat stress requires CMT3. Interestingly, loss-of-function CMT3 mutation led to increased CHH methylation at ONSEN. The CHH methylation is mediated by CMT2, as evidenced by greatly reduced CHH methylation in cmt2 and cmt2 cmt3 mutants coupled with increased ONSEN transcription. Furthermore, we found more CMT2 binding at ONSEN chromatin in cmt3 compared to wild-type accompanied with an ectopic accumulation of H3K9me2 under heat stress, suggesting a collaborative role of H3K9me2 and CHH methylation in preventing heat-induced ONSEN activation. In summary, this study identifies a non-canonical role of CMT3 in preventing transposon silencing and provides new insights into how DNA methyltransferases regulate transcription under stress conditions.

Author summary

DNA methylation is generally known to silence transposon and maintain genome integrity. Environmental stress has been reported to release the transcriptional silencing of some transposable elements. DNA methylation is involved in the transcriptional restriction of heat-induced Copia-type retrotransposon ONSEN in Arabidopsis when subjected to heat stress. Here, we identified a non-canonical and positive role of the DNA methyltransferase CMT3 in ONSEN reactivation under heat stress. We showed that CMT3 prevents CMT2-mediated CHH methylation and H3K9me2 accumulation under heat at ONSEN chromatin to modulate ONSEN transcription. Our work revealed the molecular mechanism of CMT3 in heat-induced ONSEN activation and sheds new light on the survival mechanism of certain transposons in the host genome under stress conditions.

Introduction

DNA methylation is vital for silencing of repetitive sequences and transposable elements (TEs) to ensure genome stability and integrity [1]. Plant DNA methyltransferases methylate cytosine in three different contexts, including CG, CHG, and CHH (H = A, C, or T) [2]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the de novo DNA methylation is mediated by DOMAINS REARRANGED METHYLTRANSFERASE 2 (DRM2) through the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway. This process involves the biogenesis of small interfering RNA (siRNA) and the recruitment of DRM2 to target DNA sequences for methylation [2]. The maintenance of CHG and CHH methylation is primarily mediated by CHROMOMETHYLASE3 (CMT3) and CHROMOMETHYLASE2 (CMT2), respectively, through a self-reinforcing mechanism [3,4]. Specifically, CMT2 and CMT3 methylate DNA through the dual binding of H3K9 di-methylation (H3K9me2)-containing nucleosomes via their bromo adjacent homology (BAH) and Chromo domains [3]. In turn, histone methyltransferases SUVH4/KYP, SUVH5, and SUVH6 bind CMT3-methylated CHG or CMT2-methylated CHH and deposit two methyl groups on H3K9 (H3K9me2) [4,5]. CMT3 also tends to methylate CHG at large TEs and leads to the transcriptional repression of these TEs [4,6]. CMT2 catalyzes CHH methylation predominantly at large TEs localized to heterochromatin [7]. In contrast, DRM2 maintains CHH methylation at short TEs, the border of large TEs, and other repeat sequences in euchromatic regions [2,7].

TEs are widely distributed in the eukaryotic genome, ranging from 15% TEs in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome to 85% in the Zea mays genome [8,9]. There are two classes of TEs, DNA transposons that transpose by a ‘cut-and-paste’ mechanism, and retrotransposons that mobilize by a ‘copy-and-paste’ mechanism through an RNA intermediate [8]. ONSEN/COPIA78 is a Ty1/copia-like retrotransposon with long terminal repeat (LTR) at both ends in Arabidopsis thaliana [10]. Because the LTRs at the 5’ and 3’ ends are identical at the time of insertion, the sequence differences between the LTR pairs can be used to infer the timing of the transpositions. ONSEN contains eight copies (ONSEN1-8) in the genome of the Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia (Col-0) ecotype [11]. Three of them (ONSEN1-3) have identical 5’ and 3’ LTR sequences, suggesting that they are recent insertions [12]. We previously found that ONSEN preferentially targets euchromatic regions and affects gene expression [13]. For instance, a new ONSEN insertion at an abscisic acid (ABA) responsive gene ABI5 leads to an ABA-insensitive phenotype [13].

Although most TEs are epigenetically silenced by DNA methylation, environmental stresses can temporarily release TEs and heterochromatin silencing [14,15]. Previous studies have reported that ONSEN is activated by heat stress in Arabidopsis [12]. Under heat stress conditions, ONSEN is transcriptionally activated by the heat-responsive transcription factors including HSFA2 by recognizing the heat shock elements located within the LTR of ONSEN, further resulting in the production of extrachromosomal DNA [11]. Heat-induced ONSEN accumulation was significantly increased in the mutant of NRPD1, a subunit of RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) and a key factor in siRNA biosynthesis and RdDM pathway, suggesting that the siRNA pathways are involved in the repression of ONSEN transcription under heat stress [12]. However, the molecular mechanism of DNA methylation in ONSEN reactivation under heat stress remains unknown.

Here, we investigated ONSEN transcription in DNA methyltransferase mutants including drm1 drm2, cmt2, and cmt3. Surprisingly, we found that heat-induced transcription of ONSEN is dampened in cmt3 mutant under heat stress. Loss-of-function of CMT3 results in an increased CHH methylation at ONSEN. This methylation is mediated by CMT2, as knocking out CMT2 in cmt3 mutant leads to reduced CHH methylation accompanied with ONSEN accumulation. This phenomenon of reduced TE expression in the cmt3 mutant is distinct from the previously reported findings that CMT3 mediates transposon silencing. We also found increased CMT2 binding and H3K9me2 level after heat stress at the ONSEN locus in the cmt3 mutant. Furthermore, we found reduced CMT2 protein level and H3K9me2 level at ONSEN under heat treatment. Together, this study identifies a non-canonical role of CMT3 in preventing TE silencing and provides new insights into the regulatory mechanism of DNA methylation on transposon reactivation under environmental stress.

Results

ONSEN transcriptional activation is dampened in cmt3 under heat stress

We have previously shown that heat stress activates ONSEN transcription, and the heat–induced ONSEN transcripts are further accumulated in mutants impaired in the siRNA biogenesis pathway [12]. SiRNAs guide DNA methylation at target loci containing homologous sequences through the RdDM pathway, leading to transcriptional silencing [2]. To determine the role of DNA methylation in ONSEN transcription under heat stress, we examined its transcript level in DNA methylation-deficient mutants by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). Consistent with previously published results [12], higher ONSEN RNA level was noted in drm1 drm2 (drm1/2) and cmt2 mutants compared to Col-0 under heat stress (S1 Fig). Surprisingly, ONSEN transcripts decreased more than 50% in cmt3-11 (hereafter called cmt3) mutants compared to Col-0 under heat stress (Figs 1A and S1). Similar results were observed in cmt3-7 mutants of the Landsberg erecta (Ler) accession (Fig 1A). These data suggest that CMT3 plays an important role in the full transcription of ONSEN under heat stress.

Fig 1. Heat-induced ONSEN transcript accumulation is dampened in cmt3 mutants.

Fig 1

(A) RT-qPCR of ONSEN transcripts in cmt3 mutants from Columbia-0 (cmt3-11, left) and Landsberg erecta (cmt3-7, right) backgrounds under non-stress (NS) and heat stress (HS). The ONSEN transcripts were normalized to 18S rRNA. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05. (B) The scatterplots of count per million reads (CPM) of protein-coding genes and transposable elements (TEs) in cmt3 versus Col-0 under NS (top) and HS (bottom). Dash lines indicate two-fold changes. (C) Heat maps of differentially expressed TEs in Col-0 and cmt3-11 under NS and HS from three biological replicates (rep1 to rep3). Color bar indicates the Z-score.

To explore whether CMT3 negatively regulates other transposon families under heat stress, we performed transcriptome analysis using high-throughput RNA-seq of the cmt3 mutant and Col-0 under non-stress and heat stress conditions (S1 Table and S1 Data). However, we did not find any other transposons that were down regulated in cmt3 compared with Col-0 under heat stress. ONSEN was the only heat-induced transposon family that showed reduced transcript levels in cmt3 under heat stress (Fig 1B and 1C). To further investigate whether CMT3 regulates additional heat-induced transposons, we examined the transcript level of two prominent heat-responsive COPIA families, ROMANIAT5 and AtCOPIA37 [10], in cmt3 mutants under heat stress. The transcript level of AtCOPIA37 was unchanged and the expression of ROMANIAT5 was only slightly reduced in cmt3 (S2 Fig). Together, these results suggest that CMT3-dependen transposon activation under heat stress is mostly likely ONSEN-specific.

CMT3 regulates ONSEN transcription independent of the heat-shock response pathway

Heat shock factors and heat shock proteins are key players in response to heat stress [1619]. Heat-induced transcription factor HSFA2 is required for the transcriptional activation of ONSEN during heat stress [11,20]. It prompted us to study whether the dampened ONSEN activation in cmt3 resulted from a dysfunctional heat-shock response pathway. We examined the transcript level of two heat-responsive genes, HSFA2 and HSP90.1 [21], in cmt3 and Col-0. Expression of both HSFA2 and HSP90.1 was unchanged in cmt3 under heat stress relative to Col-0 (S3 Fig), suggesting that CMT3 regulates ONSEN transcription independent of the heat shock response pathway.

It has been reported that prolonged heat stress can lead to decondensation of chromatin [22,23]. Therefore, the reduced ONSEN transcription in cmt3 may likely result from diminished chromatin decondensation after heat stress. To test this idea, we performed 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, a fluorescent stain of nuclear DNA, to visualize the chromatin compactness. Under heat stress, about 80% of the nuclei were dispersed in Col-0 (S4 Fig), confirming that heat induced chromatin decondensation. In cmt3, a similar percentage of nuclei were dispersed compared to Col-0 under heat stress (S4 Fig), indicating that the reduced ONSEN transcription in cmt3 is less likely caused by a more compacted chromatin state.

BAH, chromo, and catalytic domains of CMT3 are required for the activation of ONSEN

CMT3 is a DNA methyltransferase mediating CHG methylation, which depends on recognizing histone H3K9me2 via both BAH and chromo domains [3]. To investigate the importance of BAH and chromo domains in CMT3-mediated ONSEN regulation, we used the published FLAG-tagged CMT3 transgenic plants carrying mutations within the BAH (FLAG-CMT3bah) and chromo domain (FLAG-CMT3chr) that are defective in H3K9me2 binding [3]. We next heat treated these plants and found that wild-type CMT3 (FLAG-CMT3) completely restored the down regulation of ONSEN in cmt3 under heat stress. In contrast, mutations within the BAH or chromo domains failed to recover the reduced ONSEN transcription in cmt3 (Fig 2). This result suggests that a functional H3K9me2 binding activity of CMT3 is required for a full transcriptional response of ONSEN under heat stress.

Fig 2. BAH, chromo, and catalytic domains of CMT3 are required for heat-induced ONSEN transcription.

Fig 2

Bar graph showing relative ONSEN transcript level under heat stress in Col-0, cmt3-11, and transgenic plants expressing wild-type CMT3 (FLAG-CMT3), BAH domain mutant (FLAG-CMT3bah), chromo domain mutant (FLAG-CMT3chr), wild-type CMT3 (Myc-CMT3), and catalytic domain mutant (Myc-CMT3cat) in cmt3-11 background. The relative transcripts were first normalized to ACT7, and then Col-0. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. Different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05 by Student’s t-test) between samples.

Since BAH and chromo domains are required for CMT3 in maintaining the DNA methylation through the self-reinforcing CHG-H3K9 methylation loop, we investigated whether the CMT3-medidated DNA methylation is indispensable for ONSEN activation under heat stress. To address this question, we heat treated the published Myc-tagged CMT3 transgenic lines expressing either wild-type CMT3 (Myc-CMT3) or catalytically inactive CMT3 mutant (Myc-CMT3cat) in cmt3 background [3]. We found that the reduced ONSEN transcripts in cmt3 were restored in the wild-type CMT3 (Myc-CMT3), but not in the CMT3 catalytic mutant (Fig 2), suggesting that catalytic activity of CMT3 is required for the full activation of ONSEN under heat stress.

CHH hypermethylation at ONSEN in cmt3 is mediated by CMT2

Given the importance of CMT3-mediated DNA methylation in heat-induced ONSEN activation, we examined the DNA methylation levels at the ONSEN locus using previously published bisulfite-sequencing (BS-seq) data [6]. We found a low number of methylated CHG sites at the ONSEN locus (ONSEN2, AT3G61330) in Col-0 (Fig 3A). Interestingly, CHH methylation was abundant across the ONSEN locus (Fig 3A), consistent with the findings that the LTR of ONSEN only contains CHH methylation [11]. Furthermore, the CHH methylation level showed a great increase in cmt3 compared to Col-0, particularly in the body region of ONSEN (Fig 3B and 3C). Besides ONSEN, we identified additional TEs with CHH hypermethylation in cmt3 (S5A Fig and S2 Data). Further analysis showed that these TEs are enriched in TE families such as DNA and DNA/MuDR and are featured with significantly less CHG content, but greater CHH content compared to all TEs across the genome (S5B and S5C Fig). Bisulfite Sanger-sequencing of the ORFs of ONSEN1 (AT1G11265) and ONSEN2 also displayed an increase of CHH methylation in cmt3 (Fig 3D). Taken together, these data indicate that CMT3-regulated ONSEN transcription is highly correlated with CHH methylation.

Fig 3. CHH hypermethylation at ONSEN in cmt3 is mediated by CMT2.

Fig 3

(A) Genome browser view of CHG and CHH methylation within ONSEN2 (AT3TE92525/AT3G61330), in Col-0. (B) Genome browser view of CHH methylation within ONSEN2 in Col-0, cmt3-11, cmt2-3, cmt2 cmt3, drm1/2, and drm1/2 cmt3. (C) Metaplots showing average CHH methylation of 8 ONSEN copies in the corresponding mutants. -2kb indicates the upstream 2000 bp of the start site, and 2kb indicates the downstream of 2000 bp of the end site. (D) Bisulfite Sanger-sequencing for CHH methylation level of the ORFs of ONSEN2 and ONSEN1, two ONSEN copies highly induced by heat stress, in the corresponding mutants under non-stress (NS) and heat stress (HS). (E) Boxplots showing CWA (CAA and CTA) and non-CWA CHH methylation level in Col-0, cmt2-3, and cmt3-11 of the open reading frame (ORF) of all eight copies of ONSEN. P-values are from Wilcoxon test. (F) RT-qPCR of ONSEN transcripts in the corresponding mutants under NS and HS. All bars represent mean + SD from two biological replicates. The ONSEN transcripts were normalized to 18S rRNA. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. ns indicates not significant.

CHH methylation of Arabidopsis TEs is maintained by both RdDM-dependent DRM2 and RdDM-independent CMT2 methyltransferases [4]. DRM2 tends to methylate euchromatic TEs and edges of large TEs, while CMT2 methylates TEs located at pericentromeric heterochromatin [4,7]. Next, we determined whether the increased CHH methylation at ONSEN in cmt3 is mediated by DRM2 or CMT2. The published BS-seq data of cmt2, cmt2 cmt3, drm1/2 and drm1/2 cmt3 was analyzed to examine the CHH methylation level at ONSEN [6]. We found that CHH methylation was reduced at the edges of the ONSEN in the drm1/2 double mutant, but was almost completely lost in cmt2, particularly in the TE body (Fig 3C). Knocking out CMT2 in cmt3 (cmt2 cmt3) rendered a complete loss of CHH methylation, whereas loss of DRM1 and DRM2 in cmt3 (drm1/2 cmt3) did not cause a change at the TE body (Fig 3B–3D). It is reported that CMT2 preferentially catalyzes CWA (i.e. CTA or CAA) methylation in Arabidopsis [24]. We then analyzed the CWA and non-CWA CHH methylation levels over the open reading frames (ORFs) of all 8 copies of ONSEN and found that CWA methylation level was significantly higher (P = 0.013) in cmt3 compared with that of Col-0 (Fig 3E). Together, these data suggest that CMT2 is the primary DNA methyltransferase responsible for CHH methylation at the ONSEN locus.

To assess whether the change of the CHH methylation level is associated with a differential transcription, we examined ONSEN transcripts in cmt2, cmt2 cmt3, drm1/2, and drm1/2 cmt3 under heat stress by RT-qPCR. ONSEN transcripts were significantly increased in cmt2 (Figs 3F and S6), consistent with the decreased CHH methylation level. Knocking out CMT2 in cmt3 restored the reduced ONSEN transcripts in cmt3 to a level similar to cmt2, whereas drm1/2 cmt3 showed a slightly higher ONSEN level but was still significantly lower than the drm1/2 mutant (Figs 3F and S1 and S6). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the dampened ONSEN activation in cmt3 under heat stress is largely due to the increased CHH methylation mediated by CMT2.

CMT3 regulates CMT2 binding to ONSEN chromatin

To understand the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of CMT3 on CMT2-mediated CHH methylation at the ONSEN locus, we first explored whether the increased CHH methylation at ONSEN in the cmt3 mutant is due to an increase of CMT2 at the transcriptional level. We found that the CMT2 expression level was unchanged in cmt3 relative to Col-0 (S7A Fig), suggesting that CHH hypermethylation at ONSEN in cmt3 is unlikely due to the increased CMT2 expression.

The similarity of CMT2 and CMT3 in their H3K9me2 binding capacity prompted us to hypothesize that CMT3 may compete with CMT2 for H3K9me2 binding on the ONSEN locus. To test this hypothesis, we first examined the enrichment of CMT3 at the ONSEN locus by performing chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR) using previously published FLAG-tagged CMT3 lines in cmt3 [3]. We found that CMT3 is indeed enriched at ONSEN (Fig 4A and 4B). Next, we determined whether CMT2 is also enriched at ONSEN locus by generation of epitope-tagged CMT2 transgenic plants expressing full-length genomic CMT2 fused with FLAG tag in cmt2 mutant background (CMT2-FLAG/cmt2). We performed a similar ChIP-qPCR and found the enrichment of CMT2 at ONSEN (Fig 4C) under normal conditions. To further investigate the impact of CMT3 on CMT2 binding at ONSEN, we crossed CMT2-FLAG/cmt2 into cmt3 mutant to generate homozygous CMT2-FLAG in cmt2 cmt3 background (CMT2-FLAG/cc) lines. The CMT2 protein level was not affected by CMT3 mutation (S7B Fig). We subsequently performed ChIP-qPCR and found that CMT2 binding at ONSEN was increased in CMT2-FLAG/cc compared to CMT2-FLAG/cmt2 (Fig 4C), but not on the negative control AT4G00810 [25]. This result suggests that the presence of CMT3 leads to less occupancy of CMT2 at ONSEN chromatin.

Fig 4. CMT2 binding on ONSEN is increased in cmt3 mutant.

Fig 4

(A) A diagram showing ONSEN structure and the locations of ChIP-qPCR amplicons. LTR, long terminal repeat; ORF, open reading frame; HSE, heat-shock element. (B) ChIP-qPCR showing CMT3 enrichment at ONSEN in Col-0 and CMT3 tagged line in cmt3-11 (FLAG-CMT3) under non-stress (NS) or heat stress (HS) conditions. After normalization to input, ChIP samples were further normalized to the respective spike-in of human chromatin. TA3 was used as a positive control, and ACT7 was used as a negative control. All bars represent mean + SD from two biological replicates with all technical replicates shown. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant. (C) ChIP-qPCR showing CMT2 enrichment at ONSEN in Col-0 and CMT2 tagged line in cmt2 (CMT2-FLAG/cmt2) and cmt2 cmt3 (CMT2-FLAG/cc) under NS or HS conditions. After normalization to input, ChIP samples were further normalized to the respective spike-in of human chromatin. AT4G00810 was used as a negative control. All bars represent mean + SD from two (NS) or one (HS) biological replicates with all technical replicates shown. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant. (D) CMT2 protein level in a time-course of heat (37°C) treatment. The fitting curve was generated using a one-phase decay model, and a half-life was calculated.

We next investigated the effect of heat stress on the binding of CMT3 and CMT2 at ONSEN locus. As heat stress will promote the generation of extrachromosomal DNA [12], we used primers located in both ONSEN ORF and primers flanking the borders for ChIP-qPCR (Fig 4A). After heat stress, we noticed significant CMT3 binding at ONSEN locus, though the enrichment level seems to be reduced (Fig 4B). However, we could not detect CMT2 binding in both CMT2-FLAG/cmt2 and CMT2-FLAG/cc lines after heat stress (Fig 4C). Next, we examined CMT2 protein levels in these CMT2-FLAG transgenic plants upon a series of heat treatment time points. Surprisingly, CMT2 proteins degraded quickly when plants were subjected to heat treatment and the calculated half-life is about 2.7 hours (Figs 4D and S8A and S8B). There were no noticeable changes in both CMT3 and DRM2 protein levels after heat stress (S8C and S8D Fig). Furthermore, we examined the expression level of CMT2 upon heat stress and found that CMT2 transcript level was reduced at the 3 hour time-point and then remained stable with prolonged heat treatment (S8E Fig).

Ectopic accumulation of H3K9me2 at ONSEN under heat stress in cmt3 mutant

CMT2-mediated CHH methylation depends on H3K9me2 [26]. To determine whether increased CMT2 binding to ONSEN in cmt3 is correlated with H3K9me2 abundance, we examined the H3K9me2 level at ONSEN using previously published data [4]. We found that H3K9me2 is abundant at ONSEN in Col-0 but is greatly reduced in the loss-of-function H3K9 methyltransferase mutant of SUVH4, SUVH5, and SUVH6 (suvh456) (Fig 5A). Furthermore, the suvh456 mutant showed much lower CHH methylation compared to Col-0 in the body region of ONSEN (Fig 5B and 5C). We further analyzed the CWA and non-CWA CHH methylation of the ORFs of all 8 copies of ONSEN and found that CWA methylation level was significantly increased in cmt3 compared with that of wild-type and suvh456 (Fig 5D). We also found more ONSEN transcripts in suvh456 than Col-0 after heat stress (Fig 5E), similar to that of cmt2 (Fig 3F). Knocking out SUVH4, SUVH5, and SUVH6 in the cmt3 mutant restored ONSEN transcription to a similar level to suvh456 (Fig 5E). These results suggest that H3K9me2 plays an important role in the CMT3-mediated regulation of ONSEN under heat stress.

Fig 5. CMT3-mediated ONSEN activation is regulated by H3K9 methylation.

Fig 5

(A) Genome browser view of H3K9me2 abundance at ONSEN in Col-0 and the SUVH4, SUVH5, and SUVH6 loss-of-function mutant (suvh456). (B) Genome browser view of CHH methylation at ONSEN2 in Col-0, cmt3-11, and suvh456. (C) Metaplots showing average CHH methylation of 8 ONSEN copies. -2kb indicates the upstream 2000 bp of the start site, and 2kb indicates the downstream of 2000 bp of the end site. (D) Boxplots showing CWA (CAA and CTA) and non-CWA CHH methylation level in Col-0, cmt3-11, and suvh456 of the open reading frame (ORF) of all eight copies of ONSEN. P-values are from Wilcoxon test. (E) Relative ONSEN transcript level in the corresponding mutants under non-stress (NS) and heat stress (HS). The ONSEN transcripts were normalized to 18S rRNA. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (F) ChIP-qPCR showing H3K9me2 level at ONSEN in Col-0,cmt3, and cmt2 under NS and HS. H3K9me2 ChIP samples were first normalized to parallel H3 ChIP, and then to the respective spike-in human chromatin. ACT7 served as a negative control. TA3 was used as a positive control. All bars represent mean + SEM from three biological replicates with all technical replicates shown. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant.

Next, we performed H3K9me2 and H3 ChIP-qPCR in cmt3, cmt2 and Col-0 to compare the H3K9me2 abundance under non-stress and heat stress. Under non-stress, we found a significantly lower H3K9me2 level at ONSEN in cmt2 compared to Col-0 (Fig 5F). Under heat stress, H3K9me2 level is significantly reduced at both ONSEN and TA3 locus in Col-0 (Figs 5F and S9A and S9B). This H3K9me2 reduction is correlated with the decondensation of chromatin caused by heat stress since H3K9me2 is enriched in the heterochromatic region [22]. It is also consistent with previous reports showing H3K9me2 reduction at ONSEN after long-term heat stress (37°C for 30 h) [27], and the upregulation of many TEs under heat stress in both Col-0 and cmt3 (Fig 1C, [10,28]). Surprisingly, we found that the H3K9me2 level at ONSEN is significantly higher in cmt3 mutant than that in Col-0 under HS (Figs 5F and S9A), despite their similar global H3K9me2 levels (S9C and S9D Fig). Consistently, we found that the ONSEN transcriptional activation is much slower in cmt3 compared with Col-0, while the ONSEN transcription activation was much faster in cmt2 (S10 Fig). Taken together, H3K9me2 and CHH methylation function collaboratively in regulating heat induced ONSEN transcription.

Discussion

DNA methylation is known to suppress transposon activation to maintain genome integrity in both plants and animals. In this study, we found that a plant-specific DNA methyltransferase CMT3 plays a positive role in the transcriptional activation of a unique transposon family under heat stress. We propose a model wherein CMT3 modulates heat-induced ONSEN transcriptional activation by regulating both H3K9me2 and CMT2-mediated CHH methylation. Under non-stress conditions, loss of CMT3 leads to increased CMT2-mediated CHH methylation. Under heat stress, the CHH methylation and H3K9me2 remain high at the ONSEN locus in cmt3 mutant, in contrast to the reduced H3K9me2 in wild type, leading to dampened ONSEN transcriptional activation in cmt3 (Fig 6). The CHH methylation and H3K9me2 levels are low in cmt2 mutant, resulting in increased ONSEN activation by heat stress (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Working model for CMT3 function in heat-induced ONSEN activation.

Fig 6

Under non-stress (NS) conditions, CMT2 and CMT3 are recruited to ONSEN locus by H3K9me2 via a self-reinforcing loop. In the wild-type (WT), CMT3 in the ONSEN region suppresses the binding of CMT2. Loss-of-function CMT3 induces increased CHH methylation mediated by CMT2. Upon heat stress (HS), ONSEN transcription is activated by heat shock factors (HSFs). The high levels of CHH methylation and H3K9me2 at ONSEN chromatin in cmt3 dampen its transcriptional activation by HSFs. In cmt2, the CHH methylation and H3K9me2 levels are low, leading to increased ONSEN transcription under heat stress. CMT2 protein is degraded by prolonged heat stress.

CMT3 is responsible for CHG methylation and transposon silencing, while its paralog CMT2 is mainly responsible for CHH methylation jointly with DRM2 [3,7]. Here, we reveal a non-canonical role of CMT3 in preventing retrotransposon ONSEN silencing under heat stress. We provide several lines of evidence that CMT3-regulated ONSEN transcription under heat stress is mainly through CMT2-mediated CHH methylation. First, the CHH methylation at ONSEN was primarily mediated by CMT2 (Fig 3B–3E). The CHH methylation was depleted in the cmt2 mutant but not in the drm1 drm2 mutant, particularly within the TE body (Fig 3B–3E). Similar evidence showed a dramatic reduction of CHH methylation at ONSEN in cmt2 cmt3, but not in the drm1 drm2 cmt3 triple mutant, further confirming that CMT2 catalyzes CHH methylation at ONSEN. Second, we show that the CHH methylation level was negatively correlated with ONSEN transcription (Fig 3F). ONSEN was downregulated in the cmt3 mutant, but was significantly upregulated when knocking out CMT2, as shown in the cmt2 cmt3 double mutant. It is noted that the ONSEN transcript was slightly increased in the drm1/2 cmt3 mutant, which may be due to the reduced CHH methylation at the LTR regions. It is possible that the RdDM pathway regulates the ONSEN CHH methylation at LTR regions while CMT2 contributes to the TE body methylation. This is consistent with a previous report indicating that CMT2 is required for TE body methylation on long TEs, including the Copia family [7]. Consistently, a recent study also found that DNA methylation was required for histone H1-mediated repression of ONSEN in heat stress response [29]. It has been demonstrated that a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor blocked the up-regulation of ONSEN in the heat-treated h1 mutant [29]. Coinciding with our finding, the ONSEN/COPIA78 was upregulated in heat-treated cmt2 mutants [29]. Additionally, it has been reported that CHH methylation variation in the accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana grown at two different temperatures was associated with natural CMT2 variation [30]. Our study presented here exemplifies the role of CMT2-mediated CHH methylation in CMT3-regulated ONSEN activation under heat stress.

Both CMT2 and CMT3 can bind to H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes through the dual binding of the BAH domain and chromodomain, leading to CHH and CHG methylation, respectively [3,4]. Here, our results suggest that CMT2 and CMT3 may compete for H3K9me2 binding at the ONSEN locus. We demonstrated that both CMT3 and CMT2 were enriched at the ONSEN chromatin (Fig 4B and 4C). The binding of CMT3 on H3K9me2 may restrict the amount of H3K9me2 that CMT2 can access, thus leading to CHH hypomethylation. In addition, the CHG context at ONSEN was significantly lower than average TEs (S5C Fig). In contrast, the CHH context was higher at ONSEN (S5C Fig), further indicating that the binding of CMT3 may negatively regulate CMT2-mediated CHH methylation. In the absence of CMT3, the binding of CMT2 on ONSEN was indeed slightly increased (Fig 4C) accompanied with increased CHH methylation level and high H3K9me2 level under heat stress (Figs 3 and 5F).

Increased CHH methylation at transposons has been shown to be associated with high temperature accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana [30]. In Arabidopsis, heat stress has been reported to trigger upregulation of critical genes involved in the RdDM pathway and induce increased DNA methylation at certain loci, for instance, retrotransposon AtSN1 and protein-coding genes [31,32]. However, we did not observe any CHH hypermethylation at ONSEN under heat stress (Fig 3E). This result may correlate with the limit of siRNA levels that are required to trigger DNA methylation [2], as the 21nt-siRNA level originated from ONSEN is very low immediately after heat stress and gradually increases during recovery [12]. Unlike the accessions continuously grown at low or high temperatures, our heat stress experiment was conducted at 37°C for only 24 hours, which may not be sufficient for the DNA methylation change to occur. This suggests that the dampened ONSEN activation in the cmt3 mutant is unlikely due to the effect of heat stress on DNA methylation level. Our study suggests that short period of heat treatment does not affect overall CHH methylation but it is sufficient for H3K9me2 changes to occur at ONSEN (Fig 5F). In Arabidopsis, heat stress can cause nucleosome eviction, global rearrangement of the 3D genome, and heterochromatin decondensation without altering DNA methylation [22,27,28] (S9B Fig). H3K9me2 is enriched at heterochromatin and required for the silencing of TEs [33]. Consistently, we found a reduction of H3K9me2 at ONSEN under heat (Fig 5F), which is in agreement with decreased proportion of condensed nuclei after heat stress (S4 Fig).

It has been reported that ONSEN is initially reactivated by heat-induced transcription factor HSFA2 through recognizing the heat shock element within the LTR [11]. DNA methylation is responsible for suppressing ONSEN reactivation after heat stress [12]. On the other hand, TEs have also evolved survival strategies in the host genome to escape transcriptional repression and regulate host responses. For instance, cytosine mutation to thymine of CpG dinucleotide can cause CpG loss and disable the methylation on TE DNA, allowing TEs to take on regulatory functions in the host genome [34]. In terms of transposon survival strategies, ONSEN may utilize CMT3 to prevent excessive CHH methylation mediated by CMT2, thus escaping transcriptional suppression by the host plant. The survival of TEs accompanied by transposition in the host genome possibly provides additional regulatory mechanisms for the plant response to severe stress conditions. Future studies on characterizing the consequences of ONSEN transposition in the stress response will shed light on the TE-based regulatory mechanism. In conclusion, distinct from the canonical view that DNA methyltransferases generally act as repressors in the transcriptional regulation of TEs, our findings have uncovered a non-canonical function of the DNA methyltransferase CMT3 in preventing TE silencing under heat stress, specifically for the ONSEN/ATCOPIA78 family.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and heat stress treatment

All Arabidopsis thaliana wild-type and mutants were in Columbia (Col-0) ecotype background, except cmt3-7 (CS6365) in the Landsberg erecta (Ler) background. The T-DNA insertion mutant cmt2-3 (SALK_012874), cmt3-7 (CS6365), and cmt3-11 (CS16392) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. kyp-4 (suvh4) suvh5-2 suvh6-1 (suvh456) [35] was crossed with cmt3-11 to generate cmt3 suvh456 quadruple mutant. The drm1 drm2 (drm1/2), cmt2 cmt3, drm1 drm2 cmt3 (dd cmt3), and drm1 drm2 cmt2 cmt3 (ddcc) mutants were gifts from Dr. Steven Jacobsen’s lab [4,36,37].

The seeds were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol plus 0.01% Triton X-100 for 15 minutes, washed twice with 100% ethanol, and then sowed onto plates containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog (½ MS) medium and 0.8% agar. The seeds were stratified in the dark at 4°C for 3 days and then grown under a light intensity of 100 μmol m-2 s-1 with 24h light at 22°C. For heat stress, the 10-day-old seedlings were subjected to 37°C for 24 hours. For time-course heat treatment, 7-day-old seedlings were treated by 37°C for indicated time and samples were collected at each time-point. Samples were collected immediately after heat stress and frozen in liquid nitrogen.

Construction of plasmids and generation of transgenic plants

The genomic sequence of CMT2, including 1.36 kb of the promoter, was amplified using genomic Col-0 DNA as a template. A list of primers is in S2 Table. The PCR products were digested by SacI and XmaI and then ligated to pCAMBIA1306 with a C-terminal 3x FLAG tag. The plasmid was transformed into the Agrobacterium strain GV3101, and the recombinant strain was transformed into the cmt2-3 background (SALK_012874) by the floral dip method. The seeds were selected on hygromycin plates (35 mg/L). Homozygous single-insertion lines (with a 3:1 ratio of hygromycin resistant vs. non-resistant in T2) were used. To generate gCMT2-FLAG in the cmt2 cmt3 background, a homozygous line of gCMT2-FLAG/cmt2-3 was crossed with cmt3-11 (SALK_148381). F2 plants were genotyped for a homozygous cmt2-3 cmt3-11 background. Homozygous gCMT2-FLAG/cmt2-3 cmt3-11 F3 plants were screened by hygromycin selection. FLAG-CMT3/cmt3, FLAG-CMT3bah3/cmt3, FLAG-CMT3chr3/cmt3, Myc-CMT3/cmt3, and Myc-CMT3cat/cmt3 have been previously described [3]. The DRM2-FLAG transgenic lines have been described [38].

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

H3K9me2 and H3 ChIP was performed as previously described [39]. Two grams of 10-day-old non-stress and heat-stress treated Col-0, cmt3-11, and cmt2-3 seedlings were ground into a powder and crosslinked in nuclei isolation buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 8, 1 M sucrose, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EDTA, 0.6% Triton X-100, 0.4 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche; 14696200)) with 1% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Crosslinking was quenched by adding glycine to a final concentration of 125 mM, and the homogenate was filtered through Miracloth (Millipore, 475855). Nuclei were pelleted by centrifuging at 4000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. The pellet was washed with nuclei isolation buffer II (0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 10 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.4 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail tablet), then resuspended with 0.3 mL of nuclear lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, 0.4 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail) and kept on ice for 10 min. The lysate was diluted with 1.7 mL of ChIP dilution buffer (1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 167 mM NaCl, 0.4 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail) before shearing the chromatin by sonication using a Covaris S220 focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris). Human H3.2-FLAG-HA chromatin (~300 ng) was added to the supernatant as a spike-in control. This mixture was equally split into two parts for incubating with 5 μg H3 antibody (Abcam, ab1791) and 5 μg H3K9me2 antibody (Abcam, ab1220), respectively, for overnight with constant rotation at 4°C. The antibodies were preincubated with 25 μL Dynabeads Protein G (for H3K9me2, Invitrogen, 10003D) or Protein A (for H3, Invitrogen, 10001D) for 4–6 hours. After sequential washes with low-salt buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8), high-salt buffer (500 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8), LiCl buffer (0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8), and TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA), the DNA–protein complex was eluted with elution buffer (1% SDS, 0.1 M NaHCO3) and cross-linking was reversed by adding 200 mM NaCl and incubating at 65°C for 6 h. After sequential RNase and proteinase K treatment, DNA was purified by the standard phenol-chloroform method.

CMT2-FLAG and CMT3-FLAG ChIP were performed as previously described [25]. Nuclei were isolated from two grams of 10-day-old non-stress, and heat-stress treated seedlings and cross-linked using the same method as described above. After washing with nuclei isolation buffer II, the nuclei were resuspended with MNase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CaCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.11 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail tablet) and sheared by sonication, followed by MNase digestion for 15 min at 37°C. EDTA and EGTA were added to 5 mM to stop MNase digestion. Human H3.2-FLAG-HA chromatin (~300 ng) was added to the supernatant as a spike-in control, and incubated with anti-FLAG M2 magnetic beads (Sigma-Aldrich; M8823) overnight with constant rotation at 4°C. After sequential washes with MNase buffer, high-salt MNase buffer with 300 mM NaCl, LiCl buffer, and TE buffer. The DNA–protein complex was eluted with elution buffer and reverse cross-linked using the same method described above.

RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted with PureLink RNA mini Kit (Invitrogen; 12183025). 1 μg RNA was treated with DNase I (NEB; M0303) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using ProtoScript II First Strand cDNA Synthesis (NEB; M0368). Quantitative PCR was performed by CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad) using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-Rad; 1725125) reagent.

Library construction, sequencing, and data analysis

For RNA sequencing, the extracted RNA was converted to cDNA library with the NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB; E7770), NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEB; E7490), and NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (NEB; E6609). The libraries were sequenced on the NextSeq500 platform (Illumina), and nearly 10 million reads were obtained for each library. Low-quality reads were removed by Trimmomatic version 0.39 [40] using the following parameters “LEADING:20 TRAILING:20 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20 MINLEN:36”. Clean reads were mapped to the Arabidopsis reference genome (TAIR10) using HISAT2 version 2.1.0 with default parameters [41]. Reads were counted by transcript models. Differentially expressed genes were selected by the adjusted p-value calculated using edgeR version 3.20.9 with default settings [42].

For bisulfite sequencing, raw sequencing data were downloaded from NCBI GEO (GSE39901). Adapter sequence and low-quality reads were trimmed FASTP [43]. Clean reads were aligned to Arabidopsis TAIR10 genome with BSMAP 2.90 using the following parameters “-w100 -v2 -n1 -r1”. Methylation at every cytosine was determined by using bsmap’s methratio.py script, processing only unique reads and removing duplicates. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were detected with MethylKit [44]. The threshold methylation difference for DMRs in each sequence context was adjusted to 40% for mCG, 20% for mCHG, and 10% for mCHH. DMRs were considered significant at q < 0.01. To find DMRs that lied within TEs, lists of DMRs and all TEs from TAIR10 were compared using BEDtools [45] to find overlaps.

For ChIP-seq, raw sequencing data were downloaded from NCBI GEO (GSE51304). Low quality reads were trimmed by Trimmomatic version 0.39 using the following parameters “LEADING:20 TRAILING:20 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20 MINLEN:25”. Clean reads were aligned to Arabidopsis TAIR10 genome with Bowtie2 version 2.4.1 with default parameters [46]. ChIP-seq peaks were called by callpeak function in MACS2 version 2.2.6 [47].

Bisulfite sanger-sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated from 10-day-old seedlings with illustra Nucleon Phytopure Genomic DNA Extraction kits (GE Healthcare; RPN8510). Bisulfite conversion and desulfonation were performed using the Methylcode Bisulfite Conversion Kit (Invitrogen; MECOV50), following the manufacturer’s protocol. 400 ng genomic DNA were used for each treatment and the following PCR analysis. Primers were listed in S2 Table. Twenty clones were sequenced for each region.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. ONSEN transcription is reduced in cmt3 mutant under heat stress.

RT-qPCR showing relative ONSEN transcript level in the corresponding mutants under heat stress. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. The relative ONSEN transcripts were first normalized to 18S rRNA, and then to Col-0. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Similar transcript levels of ROMANIAT5 and AtCOPIA37 in Col-0 and cmt3 under heat stress.

The relative transcript levels were determined by RT-qPCR, first normalized to ACT7, and then to Col-0. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. P value was determined by Student’s t-test.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The expression level of heat stress transcription factor A2 (HSFA2) and heat shock protein HSP90.1 is similar in Col-0 and cmt3.

The transcripts were detected by RT-qPCR and normalized to 18S rRNA. All bars represent mean + SD from four biological replicates. Student’s t-test, ns indicates not significant. NS, non-stress; HS, heat stress.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining of nuclei in Col-0 and cmt3 mutant.

(A) Representative images of nuclei showing condensed, intermediate, and dispersed chromocenters by DAPI staining. (B) Bar graph indicating the proportion of nuclei displaying condensed, intermediate, and dispersed chromocenters in cmt3 and Col-0. N indicates the total number of nuclei counted. NS, non-stress; HS, heat stress. ** P < 0.01 by Chi-square test. ns indicates not significant.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Transposons with hyper CHH methylation in cmt3.

(A) Bar charts showing the proportion of each transposable element (TE) family in the genome that contains cmt3 hyper CHH differentially methylated regions. The P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (B) Genome browser snapshots of TEs showing hyper CHH methylation in cmt3. (C) The percentage of C context (CG, CHG, CHH) in ONSEN and other TEs with hyper CHH methylation in cmt3. The P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. CMT2 mutation restored compromised ONSEN activation in cmt3 under heat stress.

RT-qPCR showing the relative ONSEN transcript level in Col-0, cmt3-11, cmt2-3, and cmt2 cmt3 under heat stress. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. The ONSEN transcripts were first normalized to ACT7, and then to Col-0. Student’s t-test, **P < 0.01;***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. The transcript and protein levels of CMT2 are unchanged in cmt3 mutant relative to Col-0.

(A) RT-qPCR showing relative transcript levels of DRM2, CMT2, and CMT3 in Col-0, drm1 drm2 (drm1/2), cmt2-3, and cmt3-11 under heat stress. The relative transcripts were first normalized to ACT7, then to Col-0. Data are mean + SD from three biological replicates. Student’s t-test, **P < 0.01. (B) Immunoblot analysis of CMT2 protein in CMT2 tagged lines in cmt2 (CMT2-FLAG/cmt2) and cmt2 cmt3 background (CMT2-FLAG/cc). Arrows indicate CMT2-FLAG protein. Actin serves as a loading control.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. The protein levels of CMT2, CMT3, and DRM2 under time-course heat stress.

(A and B) The protein levels of CMT2-FLAG in cmt2 (A) and cmt2 cmt3 (B) backgrounds after time-course heat treatments. (C and D) The protein levels of CMT3-FLAG (C) and DRM2-FLAG (D) after time-course heat treatments. 7-d-old seedlings were subjected to 37°C heat treatment for indicated time and two biological replicates were present at each time point. Actin and ponceau staining serve as loading controls. (E) Relative transcript levels of CMT2 and CMT3 in Col-0 plants treated with 37°C heat for indicated time. The transcript levels were normalized to ACT7. Data are mean ± SD from three technical replicates at each time point.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. H3K9me2 level under heat stress.

(A and B) ChIP-qPCR showing H3K9me2 (A) and H3 (B) abundance at ONSEN in Col-0, cmt3, and cmt2 under NS and HS. ChIP samples were first normalized to input, and then to the respective spike-in of human chromatin. ACT7 served as a negative control. TA3 was used as a positive control. All bars represent mean + SEM from three biological replicates with all technical replicates shown. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant. (C and D) Immunoblots of H3 and H3K9me2 in CMT2-FLAG/cmt2 (A) and CMT3-FLAG/cmt3 (B) plants. 7-d-old seedlings were subjected to 37°C treatment for indicated time points. Two biological replicates were present at each time point.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. The ONSEN transcription in time-course of heat stress.

Relative transcript level of ONSEN in plants treated with 37°C heat for indicated time. The transcript levels were relative level of ONSEN to ACT7. 7-d-old seedlings were subjected to 37°C treatment for indicated time. For each time point, data are mean ± SD from three technical replicates. Student’s t-tests were performed against Col-0 at the same time point. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

(TIF)

S1 Table. RNA-sequencing statistics.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. List of primers used in this study.

(XLSX)

S1 Data. RNA seq data.

(XLSX)

S2 Data. TEs with cmt3 hyper CHH DMRs.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Hidetoshi Saze for technical assistance for the whole-genome bisulfite analysis, and Professor Atsushi Kato for his valuable suggestions on experimental techniques and design of the experiment.

Data Availability

All RNA-seq data files are available from the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) Sequence Read Archive (DRA011115).

Funding Statement

X.Z's. laboratory was supported by the by the NSF awards (MCB-1552455 and MCB-2043544), the NIH-MIRA (R35GM124806), and the USDA & National Institute of Food and Agriculture grant (Hatch 1012915). H.I.’s laboratory was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (JP15K21750), Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (18K06050), the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C (18J11120), and Hokkaido University President's Encouragement Program for Sending Young Faculty Members Abroadand the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C (18K06050). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Slotkin RK, Martienssen R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8: 272–285. doi: 10.1038/nrg2072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang H, Lang Z, Zhu JK. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19: 489–506. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0016-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Du J, Zhong X, Bernatavichute Y V., Stroud H, Feng S, Caro E, et al. Dual binding of chromomethylase domains to H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes directs DNA methylation in plants. Cell. 2012;151: 167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stroud H, Do T, Du J, Zhong X, Feng S, Johnson L, et al. Non-CG methylation patterns shape the epigenetic landscape in Arabidopsis. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2014;21: 64–72. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wendte JM, Zhang Y, Ji L, Shi X, Hazarika RR, Shahryary Y, et al. Epimutations are associated with CHROMOMETHYLASE 3-induced de novo DNA methylation. Elife. 2019;8: e47891. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stroud H, Greenberg MVCC, Feng S, Bernatavichute Y V., Jacobsen SE. Comprehensive analysis of silencing mutants reveals complex regulation of the Arabidopsis methylome. Cell. 2013;152: 352–364. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zemach A, Kim MY, Hsieh PH, Coleman-Derr D, Eshed-Williams L, Thao K, et al. The arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell. 2013;153: 193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bucher E, Reinders J, Mirouze M. Epigenetic control of transposon transcription and mobility in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15: 503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fultz D, Choudury SG, Slotkin RK. Silencing of active transposable elements in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;27: 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pietzenuk B, Markus C, Gaubert H, Bagwan N, Merotto A, Bucher E, et al. Recurrent evolution of heat-responsiveness in Brassicaceae COPIA elements. Genome Biol. 2016;17: 209. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1072-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cavrak V V., Lettner N, Jamge S, Kosarewicz A, Bayer LM, Mittelsten Scheid O. How a Retrotransposon Exploits the Plant’s Heat Stress Response for Its Activation. PLoS Genet. 2014;10: e1004115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ito H, Gaubert H, Bucher E, Mirouze M, Vaillant I, Paszkowski J. An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature. 2011;472: 115–119. doi: 10.1038/nature09861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ito H, Kim JM, Matsunaga W, Saze H, Matsui A, Endo TA, et al. A Stress-Activated Transposon in Arabidopsis Induces Transgenerational Abscisic Acid Insensitivity. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lisch D. Epigenetic regulation of transposable elements in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60: 43–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naito K, Zhang F, Tsukiyama T, Saito H, Hancock CN, Richardson AO, et al. Unexpected consequences of a sudden and massive transposon amplification on rice gene expression. Nature. 2009;461: 1130–1134. doi: 10.1038/nature08479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Charng Y, Liu H, Liu N, Chi W, Wang C, Chang S, et al. A heat-inducible transcription factor, HsfA2, is required for extension of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007;143: 251–262. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.091322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.LIU H, LIAO H, CHARNG Y. The role of class A1 heat shock factors (HSFA1s) in response to heat and other stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34: 738–751. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02278.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yoshida T, Ohama N, Nakajima J, Kidokoro S, Mizoi J, Nakashima K, et al. Arabidopsis HsfA1 transcription factors function as the main positive regulators in heat shock-responsive gene expression. Mol Genet Genomics. 2011;286: 321–332. doi: 10.1007/s00438-011-0647-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leng L, Liang Q, Jiang J, Zhang C, Hao Y, Wang X, et al. A subclass of HSP70s regulate development and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Res. 2017;130: 349–363. doi: 10.1007/s10265-016-0900-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Matsunaga W, Ohama N, Tanabe N, Masuta Y, Masuda S, Mitani N, et al. A small RNA mediated regulation of a stress-activated retrotransposon and the tissue specific transposition during the reproductive period in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6: 48. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Masuda S, Nozawa K, Matsunaga W, Masuta Y, Kawabe A, Kato A, et al. Characterization of a heat-activated retrotransposon in natural accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Genet Syst. 2016; 16–45. doi: 10.1266/ggs.16-00045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Probst A V, Scheid OM. Stress-induced structural changes in plant chromatin. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;27: 8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lämke J, Bäurle I. Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biol. 2017;18: 124. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1263-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gouil Q, Baulcombe DC. DNA methylation signatures of the plant chromomethyltransferases. PLoS Genet. 2016;12: e1006526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen X, Lu L, Qian S, Scalf M, Smith LM, Zhong X. Canonical and Noncanonical Actions of Arabidopsis Histone Deacetylases in Ribosomal RNA Processing. Plant Cell. 2018;30: 134–152. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Du J, Johnson LM, Jacobsen SE, Patel DJ. DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16: 519–532. doi: 10.1038/nrm4043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pecinka A, Dinh HQ, Baubec T, Rosa M, Lettner N, Scheid OM. Epigenetic regulation of repetitive elements is attenuated by prolonged heat stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22: 3118–3129. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.078493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun L, Jing Y, Liu X, Li Q, Xue Z, Cheng Z, et al. Heat stress-induced transposon activation correlates with 3D chromatin organization rearrangement in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 1886. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15809-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu S, De Jonge J, Trejo-Arellano MS, Santos-González J, Köhler C, Hennig L. Role of H1 and DNA methylation in selective regulation of transposable elements during heat stress. New Phytol. 2021;229: 2238–2250. doi: 10.1111/nph.17018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dubin MJ, Zhang P, Meng D, Remigereau M-SS, Osborne EJ, Paolo Casale F, et al. DNA methylation in Arabidopsis has a genetic basis and shows evidence of local adaptation. Elife. 2015;4: e05255. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Popova O V, Dinh HQ, Aufsatz W, Jonak C. The RdDM pathway is required for basal heat tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2013;6: 396–410. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Naydenov M, Baev V, Apostolova E, Gospodinova N, Sablok G, Gozmanova M, et al. High-temperature effect on genes engaged in DNA methylation and affected by DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;87: 102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang C, Du X, Tang K, Yang Z, Pan L, Zhu P, et al. Arabidopsis AGDP1 links H3K9me2 to DNA methylation in heterochromatin. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 4547. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06965-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou W, Liang G, Molloy PL, Jones PA. DNA methylation enables transposable element-driven genome expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117: 19359–19366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921719117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ebbs ML, Bender J. Locus-specific control of DNA methylation by the Arabidopsis SUVH5 histone methyltransferase. Plant Cell. 2006;18: 1166–76. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.041400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chan SWL, Henderson IR, Zhang X, Shah G, Chien JSC, Jacobsen SE. RNAi, DRD1, and histone methylation actively target developmentally important Non-CG DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2: 0791–0797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Henderson IR, Jacobsen SE. Tandem repeats upstream of the Arabidopsis endogene SDC recruit non-CG DNA methylation and initiate siRNA spreading. Genes Dev. 2008;22: 1597–1606. doi: 10.1101/gad.1667808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jiang J, Liu J, Sanders D, Qian S, Ren W, Song J, et al. UVR8 interacts with de novo DNA methyltransferase and suppresses DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Nat Plants. 2021;7: 184–197. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00843-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Qian S, Lv X, Scheid RN, Lu L, Yang Z, Chen W, et al. Dual recognition of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 by a plant histone reader SHL. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 2425. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04836-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37: 907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11: R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34: i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Akalin A, Kormaksson M, Li S, Garrett-Bakelman FE, Figueroa ME, Melnick A, et al. methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol. 2012;13: R87. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 357. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Wendy A Bickmore, Nathan M Springer

2 Apr 2021

Dear Dr Zhong,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 is required for ONSEN transposon activation in heat stress' to PLOS Genetics.

The manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the current manuscript. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Each of the reviewers were interested in the research presented in this work and had positive comments about some aspects of the study.  However, each of the reviewers raised important questions about aspects of the study.  Reviewer 1 points out that an alternative model might explain the observed data.  Reviewer 2 highlights the lack of molecular evidence to support the proposed mechanism.  Reviewer 3 had some questions about why the study was limited to a single ONSEN locus and why some of the molecular work was not conducted on additional genotypes used in this study.  Each of these are important feedback and would need to be productively addressed in a revised version of the manuscript. Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.  The revised work would likely be evaluated by the same reviewers and would need to satisfy their concerns.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Nathan M. Springer

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Wendy Bickmore

Section Editor: Epigenetics

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The study by Nozawa, Chen et al describes an interesting mechanism whereby a DNA methyltransferase thought to be involved in silencing of repeats/transposons is actually needed to prevent silencing. This is an interesting discovery that will impact the way people think about how these pathways function in plant genomes. This study shows that CMT3 is required to prevent ectopic H3K9me2 accumulating at ONSEN upon heat stress. The ectopic H3K9me2 recruits CMT2 to bind and methylate DNA thereby reducing ONSEN activation compared to its activation upon heat stress in wild type. This study nicely incorporates genetics, WGBS and ChIP data to convincingly show that ONSEN requires CMT3 for heat stress induced transcription.

Overall, this study will make a nice contribution to the field. However, I would like the authors to consider a different model that in my opinion better describes the data and fits with recently published studies in the field that are considering the role of heterochromatin homeostasis.

The interpretation of the data is that CMT2 methylating CHH is what leads to silencing in cmt3 mutants. There is no doubt CMT2 is required for this process as nicely shown by the genetic data. This leads the authors to conclude that the function of CMT3 is to prevent binding of CMT2 thereby allowing transcriptional activation upon heat stress. Their data nicely show that CMT3 is a better binder of H3K9me2 regions compared to CMT2, which is what leads to this model. It is certainly a possibility for what is happening.

Another model that should be presented, which I think better describes the data, is the increase in H3K9me2 that occurs at ONSEN in cmt3 is what leads to the dampened transcriptional response. CMT2 binding and methylating CHH is important, but it is secondary to greater amounts of H3K9me2. More H3K9me2 equals more CMT2 and CHH as there is no CMT3 to compete with. I don’t believe CMT3’s function is to compete for binding with CMT2 to enable activation upon heat stress (although it’s certainly one possibility). This is not to say H3K9me2 alone is sufficient for the dampened result, as it would need CMT2 to help maintain a feedback loop. Loss of either would result in greater transcription upon heat stress (as cmt2/3 mutants show in this study).

The observed situation at ONSEN under heat stress fits models whereby cmt3 mutants leads to H3K9me2 redistribution and an imbalance in heterochromatin homeostasis. Recent work by Zhang Y, et al in PNAS present evidence for the idea of heterochromatin homeostasis. This model can also be concluded using the data presented in this study. Therefore, I think the authors should include two potential models 1) the model presented in the study and 2) a model whereby increased H3K9me2 due to redistribution of H3K9m2 as a result of loss of CMT3.

Minor comments:

1. It states state multiple times in the abstract and the main text that cmt3 is required for heat induced expression of ONSEN. As show in Figure 1, ONSEN activation occurs in cmt3 mutants, it’s just not as strong. Therefore CMT3 isn’t require, yet it’s important for a full transcriptional response.

2. How many CHG sites are in the ONSEN locus, specifically where CHH is observed. Is it possible the low CHG is because there are few sites to actually methylate?

3. It was established years ago by Guoll and Baulcombe that CMT2 preferentially catalyzes CWA methylation in Arabidopsis. The study would benefit from specifically measuring CWA levels as opposed to CHH. This study should also be cited as part of this manuscript.

4. It is presented numerous times that CMT3 is activating transcription. I do not agree with this conclusion. This conclusion is made based on a cmt3 mutant. CMT3 is preventing silencing, which is not the same as activating transcription even though both result in the same amount of transcript abundance.

5. Line 104 = do not equate chromatin decondensation with “open chromatin”. Open chromatin refers to accessible chromatin regions bound by transcription factors that are typically 400-600bp in size. This is unrelated to the observed structural decondensation in this study.

6. ChIP seq would be more compelling to show CMT2/CTM3 binding if possible, although this is not required.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript entitled “DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 is required for ONSEN transposon activation in heat stress” the authors investigate the consequences of mutations in CMT2 and CMT3 for the transcriptional activation of the COPIA element ONSEN in response to heat. CMT2 and CMT3 are involved in the maintenance of DNA methylation in heterochromatic regions. Unexpectedly, the authors observed a reduction of ONSEN transcript level in the cmt3 mutant. The authors propose that this is caused by an increase of CMT2-mediated CHH methylation and H3K9me2 at ONSEN. The authors propose that in wild type, CMT3 inhibits CMT2 binding and CHH methylation of ONSEN, and by this function promotes ONSEN transcription under heat.

My major criticism on this manuscript is that the conclusions are based on rather minor changes of DNA methylation and H3K9me2 that have been mainly obtained under non-stressed conditions. However, since the model is based on changes happening under heat stress, changes of epigenetic marks should be investigated under heat stress conditions.

Major comments:

1. The authors propose that CMT3 directly binds to ONSEN and impairs binding of CMT2. However, there is only little CHGm on ONSEN, which seems at odds with this model. It is possible that CMT3 has a larger effect on ONSEN under heat, which could explain this discrepancy. However, data shown in Figure 3D are not convincing and it is also unclear how they were generated. Additional evidence would be required to support the proposed model.

2. Figure 3B and 5B: The authors propose that CHH methylation in ONSEN is increased in cmt3. This is not obvious based on the data presented. Also the metagene plots do not allow to judge quantitative changes. Boxplots would be more suitable to judge whether there are statistically significant changes of CHHm in ONSEN. This would need to be done under non-stress and stress conditions.

3. Figure 5E: The data would need to be normalized to H3 rather than INPUT. Since heat stress causes chromatin decondensation, any changes in H3K9me2 levels could rather be a consequence of nucleosome density changes than changes in H3K9me2 per nucleosome.

4. The authors propose that CMT3 is not sufficient for ONSEN repression, whereas CMT2 is. A discussion on the possible differences of CMT3 and CMT2 to mediate repression is required.

5. Different qPCR experiments were performed with different controls to normalize; is there any justification?

Minor comments:

6. The proposed role of CMT3 in the activation of transposable elements should be revised; the authors implicate that CMT3 has an active role in TE activation; but its role is rather indirect in preventing repression. This should be clarified to avoid misconceptions.

7. L153 “negatively correlating with the increased CHH methylation level”: Rephrase to ”consistent with decreased CHH methylation”.

8. L222-224 rephrase this sentence; it implicates that CMT2 is required for ONSEN activation.

9. Fig1A: The captions indicate two biological replicates, while the barplot shows three datapoints for some groups.

10. Fig2 and Fig 4A,B: Single data points should be added to the barplots as done for Fig 1A

11. Fig 5D: The statistical comparisons need to be specified, especially the double asterisks over the bar of suvh456 and cmt3 suvh456, do they refer to the comparison to Col-0?

12. Line 299-306: References for all mutants should be included.

Reviewer #3: The authors show an absence of ONSEN upregulation upon heat shock in cmt3 mutant, together with an increase of H3K9me2 compared to WT. They provide data showing that both CM2 and CMT3 bind an ONSEN locus, leading to a model of ONSEN regulation.

The findings are interesting although they are restricted to ONSEN family. Why is it so? The authors mention in the discussion that other TEs could be regulated this way but they didn't find any in their RNAseq data.

The manuscript is a bit confusing as most experiments are done on one ONSEN locus (what about the others?) and with few replicates. The manuscript would benefit from having data on transgenic lines (Fig 4) and mutants (Fig 5C, D) under stress conditions.

In the discussion part the authors mention that the HS is too short to induce DNA methylation changes, however H3K9me2 marks are drastically reduced n WT (Figure 5E). Did the authors anchored the primers for ChIP in the flanking borders of ONSEN? The very high level of eccDNA (not bearing histone marks) could affect the measure.

Fig 1A, Fig 2, Fig 5D,E: I wonder if it is feasible to calculate SD with only two biological replicates.

Fig 4: why were these experiments done without heat shock?

Line 36: class II TEs do change copy number when they jump before replication that's why they are abundant in genomes.

Line 43: evolutionary new insertions, do you mean 'recent insertions'?

Line 114-115: correct typo

Line 135: showed a greatly increase, please correct

Line 136: Sanger not sanger

Line 174: please correct the sentence

Line 208: a unique ONSEN, please correct to unique family

Line 240: what is the link with the Swedish accessions?

Line 263: the short HS treatment performed in this study is not sufficient for DNA methylation changes to occur but it is sufficient for H3K9me2 changes to occur (see Fig 5E), this should be notified here.

Line 276: reproduction?

Figure 4: on this Figure the authors show that both CMT3 and CMT2 bind an ONSEN locus in WT, without HS. What happens during the HS?

Figure 6: the two panels on the right (cmt3 mutant) are similar but with different outcomes for transcription, the H3K9 methyltransferase activity should be shown here. Also the grey/white arrows in the middle are confusing (between WT and mutant).

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 1

Wendy A Bickmore, Nathan M Springer

11 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Zhong,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 is required for full ONSEN transposon activation in heat stress' to PLOS Genetics.

The manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic but identified some concerns that we ask you address in a revised manuscript.  Reviewer 1 had a relatively simple request regarding presentation of data for a specific sequence context for some analyses.  Reviewer 2 makes an important point about the proper normalization for the ChIP data and potential issues with the model and interpretations in the title or abstract.

We therefore ask you to modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.

In addition we ask that you:

1) Provide a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

2) Upload a Striking Image with a corresponding caption to accompany your manuscript if one is available (either a new image or an existing one from within your manuscript). If this image is judged to be suitable, it may be featured on our website. Images should ideally be high resolution, eye-catching, single panel square images. For examples, please browse our archive. If your image is from someone other than yourself, please ensure that the artist has read and agreed to the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Note: we cannot publish copyrighted images.

We hope to receive your revised manuscript within the next 30 days. If you anticipate any delay in its return, we would ask you to let us know the expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments should be included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, you will need to go to the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

Please let us know if you have any questions while making these revisions.

Yours sincerely,

Nathan M. Springer

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Wendy Bickmore

Section Editor: Epigenetics

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: The new manuscript is improved for clarity and will make a nice contribution to the field. My only remaining comment is to consider presenting CWA vs non-CWA in Figure 3/5 D. If this is entirely a CMT2 dependent process the CHH shown in 3d/5d will likely be mostly CWA. i think that would be good for the reader to know.

Reviewer #2: In the revised version of the manuscript, the authors included new data showing CMT2 binding and H3K9me2 accumulation under heat stress. This is an important improvement. Based on their model, CMT3 prevents CMT2 binding, causing decreased ONSEN expression in cmt3 under heat stress. The data of non-heat treated cmt3 mutants are consistent with the model. However, the new data reveal that there is no detectable CMT2 binding in cmt3 under heat, which the authors explain by showing that CMT2 is unstable under heat. What remains inconsistent with the model is the fact that H3K9me2 levels on ONSEN are not increased in cmt3 under heat (Figure 5F). One possible explanation could be that the ChIP data have been normalized to INPUT, which, as pointed out before, will lead to a misinterpretation of the data since the chromatin decondenses under heat. Most likely, the level of H3K9me2 per nucleosome will not change under heat, contrary to what the data show. The Western blots are not addressing this point since nucleosome changes in response to heat include gain and loss of nucleosomes. Preferentially this point should be experimentally addressed (ChIP normalized to H3); but at least it needs to be discussed that the data need to be treated with caution since normalization to input does not account for changes in nucleosome density.

The title remains misleading; the fact that in the cmt3 mutant ONSEN is less expressed, does not mean that CMT3 is required for ONSEN expression. The correct description of the data, which should be reflected in the title, is that "CMT2 prevents activation of ONSEN under heat stress", or "CMT3 prevents silencing of ONSEN under heat stress". To propose that CMT3 activates ONSEN would require to show that by artificially targeting CMT3 to the ONSEN locus leads to ONSEN activation, which has not been tested and seems also unlikely.

The abstract should be rephrased along the same lines.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Decision Letter 2

Wendy A Bickmore, Nathan M Springer

12 Jul 2021

Dear Dr Zhong,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 prevents ONSEN transposon silencing under heat stress" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Nathan M. Springer

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Wendy Bickmore

Section Editor: Epigenetics

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-21-00236R2

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Wendy A Bickmore, Nathan M Springer

27 Jul 2021

PGENETICS-D-21-00236R2

DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 prevents ONSEN transposon silencing under heat stress

Dear Dr Zhong,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "DNA methyltransferase CHROMOMETHYLASE3 prevents ONSEN transposon silencing under heat stress" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Katalin Szabo

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. ONSEN transcription is reduced in cmt3 mutant under heat stress.

    RT-qPCR showing relative ONSEN transcript level in the corresponding mutants under heat stress. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. The relative ONSEN transcripts were first normalized to 18S rRNA, and then to Col-0. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Similar transcript levels of ROMANIAT5 and AtCOPIA37 in Col-0 and cmt3 under heat stress.

    The relative transcript levels were determined by RT-qPCR, first normalized to ACT7, and then to Col-0. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. P value was determined by Student’s t-test.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. The expression level of heat stress transcription factor A2 (HSFA2) and heat shock protein HSP90.1 is similar in Col-0 and cmt3.

    The transcripts were detected by RT-qPCR and normalized to 18S rRNA. All bars represent mean + SD from four biological replicates. Student’s t-test, ns indicates not significant. NS, non-stress; HS, heat stress.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining of nuclei in Col-0 and cmt3 mutant.

    (A) Representative images of nuclei showing condensed, intermediate, and dispersed chromocenters by DAPI staining. (B) Bar graph indicating the proportion of nuclei displaying condensed, intermediate, and dispersed chromocenters in cmt3 and Col-0. N indicates the total number of nuclei counted. NS, non-stress; HS, heat stress. ** P < 0.01 by Chi-square test. ns indicates not significant.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Transposons with hyper CHH methylation in cmt3.

    (A) Bar charts showing the proportion of each transposable element (TE) family in the genome that contains cmt3 hyper CHH differentially methylated regions. The P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (B) Genome browser snapshots of TEs showing hyper CHH methylation in cmt3. (C) The percentage of C context (CG, CHG, CHH) in ONSEN and other TEs with hyper CHH methylation in cmt3. The P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. CMT2 mutation restored compromised ONSEN activation in cmt3 under heat stress.

    RT-qPCR showing the relative ONSEN transcript level in Col-0, cmt3-11, cmt2-3, and cmt2 cmt3 under heat stress. All bars represent mean + SD from three biological replicates. The ONSEN transcripts were first normalized to ACT7, and then to Col-0. Student’s t-test, **P < 0.01;***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. The transcript and protein levels of CMT2 are unchanged in cmt3 mutant relative to Col-0.

    (A) RT-qPCR showing relative transcript levels of DRM2, CMT2, and CMT3 in Col-0, drm1 drm2 (drm1/2), cmt2-3, and cmt3-11 under heat stress. The relative transcripts were first normalized to ACT7, then to Col-0. Data are mean + SD from three biological replicates. Student’s t-test, **P < 0.01. (B) Immunoblot analysis of CMT2 protein in CMT2 tagged lines in cmt2 (CMT2-FLAG/cmt2) and cmt2 cmt3 background (CMT2-FLAG/cc). Arrows indicate CMT2-FLAG protein. Actin serves as a loading control.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. The protein levels of CMT2, CMT3, and DRM2 under time-course heat stress.

    (A and B) The protein levels of CMT2-FLAG in cmt2 (A) and cmt2 cmt3 (B) backgrounds after time-course heat treatments. (C and D) The protein levels of CMT3-FLAG (C) and DRM2-FLAG (D) after time-course heat treatments. 7-d-old seedlings were subjected to 37°C heat treatment for indicated time and two biological replicates were present at each time point. Actin and ponceau staining serve as loading controls. (E) Relative transcript levels of CMT2 and CMT3 in Col-0 plants treated with 37°C heat for indicated time. The transcript levels were normalized to ACT7. Data are mean ± SD from three technical replicates at each time point.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. H3K9me2 level under heat stress.

    (A and B) ChIP-qPCR showing H3K9me2 (A) and H3 (B) abundance at ONSEN in Col-0, cmt3, and cmt2 under NS and HS. ChIP samples were first normalized to input, and then to the respective spike-in of human chromatin. ACT7 served as a negative control. TA3 was used as a positive control. All bars represent mean + SEM from three biological replicates with all technical replicates shown. Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ns indicates not significant. (C and D) Immunoblots of H3 and H3K9me2 in CMT2-FLAG/cmt2 (A) and CMT3-FLAG/cmt3 (B) plants. 7-d-old seedlings were subjected to 37°C treatment for indicated time points. Two biological replicates were present at each time point.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. The ONSEN transcription in time-course of heat stress.

    Relative transcript level of ONSEN in plants treated with 37°C heat for indicated time. The transcript levels were relative level of ONSEN to ACT7. 7-d-old seedlings were subjected to 37°C treatment for indicated time. For each time point, data are mean ± SD from three technical replicates. Student’s t-tests were performed against Col-0 at the same time point. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. RNA-sequencing statistics.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. List of primers used in this study.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Data. RNA seq data.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Data. TEs with cmt3 hyper CHH DMRs.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_20210524.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_20210707_XZ.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All RNA-seq data files are available from the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) Sequence Read Archive (DRA011115).


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES