Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256289

HIV and antiretroviral treatment knowledge gaps and psychosocial burden among persons living with HIV in Lima, Peru

Rafaella Navarro 1,2,#, Jose Luis Paredes 1,2,*,#, Juan Echevarria 1,2,3, Elsa González-Lagos 1,2, Ana Graña 2,3, Fernando Mejía 1,2,3, Larissa Otero 1,2
Editor: Rekha Thapar4
PMCID: PMC8376082  PMID: 34411156

Abstract

This study aims to describe knowledge on HIV and antiretroviral (ARV) treatment and psychosocial factors among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Lima, Perú, to explore characteristics associated to this knowledge, and determine its impact on sustained viral suppression. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 171 PLWH at the largest referral health care center in Lima. The psychosocial factors measured were depression, risk of alcoholism, use of illegal drugs and disclosure. A participant had “poor knowledge” when less than 80% of replies were correct. Sustained viral suppression was defined as two consecutive viral loads under 50 copies/mL. A total of 49% and 43% had poor HIV and ARV knowledge respectively; 48% of the study population screened positive for depression and 27% reported feeling unsupported by the person they disclosed to. The largest gaps in HIV and ARV knowledge were among 98 (57%) that did not recognize that HIV increased the risk of cancer and among 57 (33%) participants that did not disagree with the statement that taking a double dose of ARV if they missed one. Moderate depression was significantly associated to poor HIV and ARV knowledge. Non-disclosure and being on ARVs for less than 6 months were associated with not achieving sustained viral suppression. Our findings highlight important HIV and ARV knowledge gaps of PLWH and a high burden of psychosocial problems, especially of depression, among PLWH in Lima, Peru. Increasing knowledge and addressing depression and disclosure could improve care of PLWH.

Introduction

HIV treatment expansion has resulted in a 51% decline in AIDS-related deaths globally from 2004 to 2017 [1]. However, HIV remains the second cause of death from an infectious disease with 1.8 million new HIV infections in 2017 [1]. The UNAIDS Fast Track strategy proposes ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030 by increasing coverage of tested, treated and virally suppressed, to reach 95% of all persons living with HIV, decreasing new infections to 200 000 among adults and zero discrimination [2].

The key for HIV control is sustained viral suppression by ensuring adherence to antiretrovirals (ARV) as detectable viral loads are associated with increased transmission, morbimortality and drug resistance. Health related knowledge and health literacy increase adherence to ARV and empower persons to participate in their own care [3,4]. Yet, significant gaps on knowledge on HIV transmission and treatment among people living with HIV (PLWH) have been described [58]. Knowledge is only one of the determinants of adherence to antiretrovirals [9,10]. Poor mental health including depression, substance abuse and heavy alcohol consumption have also been recognized as barriers to care in PLWH and are associated with low adherence, unsuppressed viremia disease progression, and mortality among PLWH [1114].

In Lima, Peru, although the level of HIV related knowledge among PLWH has not been quantified in this context, some studies shed a light on health information and outcomes among PLWH. In a study in Lima, 77% of PLWH said that they understood all information given by the doctors [15] and a qualitative study in Piura, Peru concluded that PLWH on ARV have important misconceptions on HIV transmission and treatment and maintain sexual behaviors that can facilitate HIV transmission [16].

We conducted this study to quantify HIV and ARV knowledge among PLWH attending the largest HIV referral center in Lima, and to analyze the association of demographic characteristics and psychosocial factors -specifically depression, disclosure and substance abuse–to the level of knowledge. Finally, we analyzed the impact of HIV and ARV knowledge on viral suppression controlling for psychosocial factors that could also affect viral suppression.

Materials and methods

Ethical considerations

The Institutional Review Boards of Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and Hospital Cayetano Heredia approved the study protocol. Linking of the study database and the hospital databases was done with a unique numeric ID. All study researchers were certified in responsible conduct of research. All participants in this study provided a written consent to participate to the study, after explanation of the risks and benefits of participation of this study.

Study design, setting and population

By 2016, there were 66 907 PLWH notified in Peru [17]. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the HIV program of a tertiary hospital in Lima, with a catchment area of 2,682,608 inhabitants and which provides care to the largest number of PLWH in Peru [18]. Participants were considered eligible if they were PLWH over 18 years old, registered in the hospital HIV program and able to provide written consent.

Study procedures

Eligible participants were invited to participate while waiting for routine blood sampling for viral load measurements, between November 2016 and July 2017. Those consenting were requested to answer the self-administered paper-based questionnaire, which included 18 multiple-choice questions: eleven on HIV knowledge and seven on ARV knowledge. HIV and ARV knowledge were analyzed separately since we hypothesized that they could be influenced differently by psychosocial factors, their association with viral suppression could be independent, and two previous study have studied both separately [6,8]. Questions to measure knowledge were developed based on two published surveys [6,8], and in consultation with infectious diseases clinicians and nurses providing HIV care. To determine clarity, any potential discomfort or alternative responses, the questionnaire was tested with six PLWH. The questionnaire also included 14 questions on psychosocial factors (the standardized Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI5) scale [19] for depression, the CAGE questionnaire for risk of alcoholism [20], illegal drug consumption, disclosure and perception of support by the disclosed ones) as potential determinants of knowledge and of not achieving sustained viral suppression. Six other potential determinants (age, sex, educational and marital status, time from enrollment in the HIV program and time since ARV initiation) and viral load measurements were extracted from the hospital records.

Data management and analysis

Data was entered in an Access database and analyzed using Stata v15. We calculated percentages for categorical variables and median and interquartile ranges for continuous variables of participant´s demographics, psychosocial factors and HIV and ARV knowledge. Both knowledge questionnaires were scored according to importance and implications of the knowledge addressed by infectious diseases clinicians and nurses. Each correct answer in the HIV knowledge section received 0.25 points (maximum score = 2.75). Four questions on ARV knowledge received one point and three received 0.25 points for correct answers (maximum score = 4.75). We defined “good knowledge” when 80% or more of the maximum score was obtained, and “poor knowledge” when less than 80%.

Sustained viral suppression was defined as having two consecutive viral loads with less than 50 cop/mL in a period of 12 months, we used the viral load measured on the enrollment day and the most proximate within 6 months after or before the survey.

To study the variables associated with three outcomes: poor HIV knowledge, poor ARV knowledge and not achieving sustained viral suppression we used Poisson regression to calculate prevalence ratios in the bivariate and multivariate analysis. For the multivariate analysis we included variables with a p value <0.2 in the bivariate analysis and we used backwards elimination: variables with the weakest association to the dependent variable were taken off one to one until a significant difference with the previous model was found by likelihood ratio test.

To study the determinants of poor HIV and ARV knowledge, we included factors that could be associated with poor knowledge: sociodemographic factors (sex, age, marital status and educational status), psychosocial factors (depression, disclosure, perception of support from the person to whom they had disclosed, risk of alcoholism, use of illegal drugs), time from enrollment to the HIV program and the study interview and time on ARVs. Finally, to study the role of HIV and ARV knowledge on not achieving sustained viral suppression we included PLWH who were on ARV and who had the two viral load measurements available and controlled for the factors mentioned above.

Results

Study population and participant’s characteristics

Of 255 eligible participants, 205 were enrolled, 171 completed more than 50% of the knowledge section of the survey and thus were included in the analysis of HIV and ARV knowledge. Of the 171 participants, 152 (88.9%) had two viral load measurements available and were included in the analysis for sustained viral suppression (Fig 1). Of the participants included, 121/171 (70.8%) were male, the median age was 36 (IQR 28–44). A total of 47 (27.5%), were married or cohabiting, 5 (2.9%) divorced, 108 (63.2%) single and 11 (6.4%) widowers. Eighty-five (49.7%) participants completed high school, 12 (7.0%) primary school and 74 (43.3%) university/technical studies. The median time between participants’ enrollment in the HIV program and the study interview was 4.0 years (IQR, 1.6–7.6) and the median time between ARV start date and the interview was 3.2 years (IQR 1.1–6.4). Ten (5.8%) participants were not on ARV.

Fig 1. Study population, people living with HIV in a referral center in Lima, Peru, 2016–2017.

Fig 1

Psychosocial factors

Of 171 PLWH, 154 (90.1%) reported disclosure of their HIV diagnosis, 6 (3.5%) did not disclose and 11 (6.4%) did not reply. Of the 154 patients who disclosed their HIV status, 112 (72.7%) felt supported at least by someone they disclosed to and 42 (27.3%) by no one. According to the MHI5 questionnaire, 72/171 (42.1%) were not depressed, 29/171 (17.0%) were mild depressed, 32/171 (18.7%) were moderately depressed, 21/171 (12.3%) were severely depressed and 17/171 (9.9%) did not reply. On the CAGE questionnaire, 123/171 (71.9%) PLWH were not at risk of alcoholism, 20 (11.7%) were at risk of alcoholism and 28/171 (16.4%) did not answer. Regarding use of illicit drugs 143/171 (83.6%) replied that they had never used drugs, 11/171 (6.4%) PLWH reported ongoing drug use, 12/171 (7.0%) reported using it in the past and 5/171 (2.9%) did not answer.

HIV and ARV knowledge

The median score on general HIV knowledge among 171 participants was 2.25 (IQR 1.75–2.5) and on ARV knowledge was 4 (IQR 3–4.75). Eighty-three participants (48.5%) had poor HIV knowledge and 74 (43.3%) poor ARV knowledge. The largest gap in HIV knowledge was among 98 (57.3%) that did not reply correctly that HIV increased the risk of cancer and among 90 (52.6%) that did not disagree with “The use of microbicides during sex avoids HIV transmission” (Table 1). The largest gap in ARV knowledge was among 30 (17.5%) who agreed with “If I forget to take my ARV, I can make up for it by taking a double dose the following day” and among 23 (13.5%) who believed that large amounts of alcohol does not interfere with ARV (Table 1).

Table 1. Knowledge on HIV and ARV, among people living with HIV in a referral center in Lima, Peru, 2016–2017 (N = 171).

Correct Incorrect Does not know Do not answer
Knowledge on HIV
Is HIV an illness that can be cured or controlled? 150 (87.7) 8 (4.7) 11 (6.4) 2 (1.2)
A PLWH can live the same number of years as a person not infected? 126 (73.7) 12 (7.0) 27 (15.8) 6 (3.5)
I must use a condom in any sexual relation with a person without HIV 156 (91.2) 7 (4.1) 7 (4.1) 1 (0.6)
I am at risk of another infection if I have sex with a PLWH without using a condom 136 (79.5) 21 (12.3) 11 (6.4) 3 (1.8)
I have to use condom if I have sex with a PLWH. 138 (80.7) 15 (8.8) 15 (8.8) 3 (1.8)
The use of microbicides during sex avoids HIV transmission 81 (47.4) 28 (16.4) 57 (33.3) 5 (2.9)
If I use condoms correctly I will have safe sex 149 (87.1) 11 (6.4) 8 (4.7) 3 (1.8)
HIV infection places me at higher risk of
Cancer 74 (43.3) 31 (18.1) 63 (36.3) 4 (2.3)
Sexually transmitted infections 121 (70.8) 15 (8.8) 33 (19.3) 2 (1.2)
Diarrhea 133 (77.8) 14 (8.2) 20 (11.7) 4 (2.3)
Dental problems 83 (48.5) 30 (17.5) 53 (31.0) 5 (2.9)
Knowledge on ARV
The following substances interfere with ARV
Large amounts of alcohol 117 (68.4) 23 (13.5) 18 (10.5 13 (7.6)
Marijuana 113 (66.1) 20 (11.7) 27 (15.8) 11 (6.4)
Cocaine 127 (74.3) 15 (8.8) 17 (9.9) 12 (7.0)
While I am on ARV, I do not transmit HIV 136 (79.5) 19 (11.1) 14 (8.2) 2 (1.2)
If I forget to take my ARV, I can make up for it by taking a double dose the following day 114 (66.7) 30 (17.5) 24 (14.0) 3 (1.8)
If I am feeling ok, I can discontinue ARV 147 (86.0) 8 (4.7) 14 (8.2) 2 (1.2)
It is important to discontinue ARV for a few days to rest the body 141 (82.5) 14 (8.2) 14 (8.2) 2 (1.2)

Determinants of HIV and ARV knowledge

Tables 2 and 3 show the bivariate and multivariate analysis of the demographic and psychosocial characteristics associated with HIV and ARV knowledge, respectively. Age 44 years old or more, moderate depression, receiving ARV <0.5 years and receiving ARV for 0.5–1 years were significantly associated with poor HIV knowledge in the bivariate and multivariate analysis. Single participants were less likely to have poor HIV knowledge. Moderate depression and not replying to the survey on depression, were associated to poor ARV knowledge in the bivariate and multivariate analysis. In the bivariate analysis, we found a possible interaction effect between sex and use of illegal drugs and between depression and age, but had insufficient power to test in the multivariate analysis.

Table 2. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of determinants of knowledge on HIV among people living with HIV in a referral center in Lima, Peru, 2016–2017 (N = 171).

Bivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Good HIV knowledgea Poor HIV knowledgea PR Crude (95%CI) P value Adjusted PR (95%CI) P value
Age group
18–27 25 (61.0) 16 (39.0) 1 1
28–36 25 (55.6) 20 (44.4) 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 0.61 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 0.68
37–43 24 (57.1) 18 (42.9) 1.1 (0.7–1.8) 0.72 1.3 (0.7–2.2) 0.43
≥44 14 (32.6) 29 (67.4) 1.7 (1.1–2.7) 0.01 1.6 (1.1–2.6) 0.034
Sex
Male 68 (56.2) 53 (43.8) 1 1
Female 20 (40.0) 30 (60.0) 1.4 (1.01–1.9) 0.04 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.93
Marital Status
Married or Cohabiting 15 (31.9) 32 (68.1) 1 1
Divorced 3 (60.0) 2 (40.0) 0.6 (0.2–1.8) 0.34 0.5 (0.2–1.5) 0.21
Single 65 (60.2) 43 (39.8) 0.6 (0.4–0.8) <0.01 0.7 (0.5–0.9) 0.02
Widowers 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5) 0.8 (0.5–1.4) 0.45 0.9 (0.4–1.8) 0.75
Educational status
Primary School 6 (50.0) 6 (50.0) 0.9 (0.5–1.7) 0.80 b b
High School 39 (45.9) 46 (54.1) 1
Superior Education 43 (58.1) 31 (41.9) 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.13
Mental health scale by MHI-5
Not Depressed 43 (59.7) 29 (40.3) 1 1
Mild Depressed 17 (58.6) 12 (41.4) 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.91 1.0 (0.6–1.6) 0.98
Moderate Depressed 9 (28.1) 23 (71.9) 1.8 (1.2–2.5) <0.01 1.7 (1.2–2.5) <0.01
Severe Depressed 10 (47.6) 11 (52.4) 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 0.30 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 0.26
Did not answer 9 (52.9) 8 (47.1) 1.2 (0.7–2.1) 0.60 1.3 (0.7–2.3) 0.43
Alcoholism screening risk by CAGE
No Abuse 62 (50.4) 61 (49.6) 1 b b
Risk Abuse 9 (45.0) 11 (55.0) 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 0.64
Did not answer 17 (60.7) 11 (39.3) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.36
Use of illegal drugs
Used in the past 3 (25.0) 9 (75.0) 1.6 (1.1–2.3) 0.02 b b
Sometimes 6 (54.5) 5 (45.5) 1.0 (0.5–1.9) 0.33
Never used 75 (52.4) 68 (47.6) 1
Did not answer 4 (80.0) 1 (20.0) 0.4 (0.1–2.5) 0.89
Disclosure of HIV diagnosis
At least to someone 78 (50.6) 76 (49.4) 1 b b
No one
  • 4 (66.7)

2 (33.3) 0.7 (0.2–2.1) 0.50
Did not answer 6 (54.5) 5 (45.5) 0.9 (0.5–1.8) 0.81
Self-perception of support among those disclosing
Supported by someone 56 (50.0) 56 (50.0) 1 b b
Supported by no one 22 (52.4) 20 (47.6) 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.80
Did not disclosed 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 0.7 (0.2–2.1) 0.49
Did not answer 6 (54.6) 5 (45.5) 0.9 (0.5–1.8) 0.78
Time from enrollment to the HIV program and the study interview (in years)
0–0.5 7 (50.0) 7 (50.0) 0.9 (0.2–3.9) 0.53 b b
0.51–1.5 11 (44.0) 14 (56.0) 1.0 (0.3–3.1) 0.30
1.51–4.0 23 (47.9) 25 (52.1) 1.2 (0.5–3.0) 0.23
4.01–8.6 25 (53.2) 22 (46.8) 1.0 (0.4–2.8) 0.53
>8.6 22 (59.5) 15 (40.5) 1
Time from ARV and the study interview (in years)
No ARV 6 (60.0) 4 (40.0) 1.4 (0.6–3.1) 0.93 1.4 (0.6–3.1) 0.43
<0.5 5 (33.3) 10 (66.7) 1.9 (1.1–3.4) 0.08 1.9 (1.1–3.4) 0.03
0.51–1.5 11 (39.3) 17 (60.7) 2.1 (1.2–3.6) 0.12 2.1 (1.2–3.6) <0.01
1.51–3.5 26 (54.2) 22 (45.8) 1.5 (0.9–2.8) 0.55 1.5 (0.9–2.8) 0.14
3.51–6.5 24 (54.5) 20 (45.5) 1.4 (0.8–2.4) 0.58 1.4 (0.8–2.4) 0.29
>6.51 16 (61.5) 10 (38.5) 1 1

MHI-5: Mental Health Inventory-5 ARVs: Antiretroviral.

aEach question received a 0.25 score for a correct answer. Incorrect answers, does not know or does not answer gave 0 points. The maximum possible score was 2.75. We defined “good knowledge” when ≥80% of the maximum score was obtained, and “poor knowledge” if < 80%.

bomitted because of collinearity.

Table 3. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of determinants of antiretroviral (ARV) knowledge, among people living with HIV in a referral center in Lima, Peru, 2016–2017 (N = 171).

Bivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Good ARV knowledgea Poor ARV knowledgea PR Crude (95%CI) P value Adjusted PR (95%CI) P value
Age groups
18–27 29 (70.7) 12 (29.3) 1 1
28–36 27 (60.0) 18 (40.0) 1.4 (0.8–2.5) 0.31 1.3 (0.8–2.3) 0.29
37–43 22 (52.4) 20 (47.6) 1.6 (0.9–2.9) 0.10 1.6 (0.9–2.8) 0.09
≥44 19 (44.2) 24 (55.8) 1.9 (1.1–3.3) 0.02 1.6 (0.9–2.6) 0.09
Sex
Male 73 (60.3) 48 (39.7) 1 b b
Female 24 (48.0) 26 (52.0) 1.3 (0.9–1.9) 0.13
Marital Status
Married or Cohabiting 22 (46.8) 25 (53.2) 1 1
Divorced 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0) 1.1 (0.5–2.4) 0.76 1.1 (0.5–2.3) 0.87
Single 70 (64.8) 38 (35.2) 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 0.03 0.8 (0.5–1.1) 0.14
Widowers 3 (27.3) 8 (72.7) 1.4 (0.9–2.1) 0.18 1.2 (0.8–1.9) 0.42
Educational status
Primary School 5 (41.2) 7 (58.3) 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 0.72 b b
High School 40 (47.1) 45 (52.9) 1
Technical/university education 52 (70.3) 22 (29.7) 0.6 (0.4–0.8) <0.01
Mental health scale by MHI-5
Not Depressed 50 (69.4) 22 (30.6) 1 1
Mild Depressed 20 (69.0) 9 (31.0) 1.0 (0.5–1.9) 0.96 0.9 (0.5–1.8) 0.79
Moderate Depressed 8 (25.75) 24 (75.0) 2.5 (1.6–3.6) <0.01 2.0 (1.4–3.0) <0.01
Severe Depressed 13 (61.9) 8 (38.1) 1.2 (0.7–2.4) 0.51 1.1 (0.6–2.1) 0.69
Did not answer 6 (35.3) 11 (64.7) 2.1 (1.3–3.5) <0.01 1.8 (1.1–2.9) 0.02
Alcoholism screening risk by CAGE
No Abuse 70 (56.9) 53 (43.1) 1 b b
Risk Abuse 10 (50.0) 10 (50.0) 1.2 (0.7–1.8) 0.55
Did not answer 17 (60.7) 11 (39.3) 0.9 (0.6–1.5) 0.72
Use of illegal drugs
Used in the past 5 (41.7) 7 (58.3) 1.4 (0.8–2.3) 0.73 b b
Sometime 7 (63.6) 4 (36.4) 0.9 (0.4–1.9) 0.21
Never used 83 (58.0) 60 (42.0) 1
Did not answer 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0) 1.4 (0.7–3.0) 0.35
Disclosure of HIV diagnosis
At least to someone 88 (57.1) 66 (42.9) 1 b b
No one 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 1.2 (0.5–2.7) 0.71
Did not answer 6 (54.5) 5 (45.5) 1.1 (0.5–2.1) 0.86
Self-perception of support among those disclosed
Supported by someone 63 (56.3) 49 (43.8) 1 b b
Supported by no one 25 (59.5) 17 (40.5) 0.9 (0.6–1.4) 0.72
Did not disclosed 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 1.1 (0.5–2.6) 0.75
Did not answer 6 (54.5) 5 (45.4) 1.0 (0.5–2.1) 0.91
Time from ARV and the study interview (in years)
No ARV 5 (50.0) 5 (50.0) 1.3 (0.6–3.0) 0.52 b b
0–0.5 6 (40.0) 9 (60.0) 1.6 (0.8–3.0) 0.17
0.51–1.5 18 (64.3) 10 (35.7) 0.9 (0.5–1.9) 0.84
1.51–3.5 29 (60.4) 19 (39.6) 1.0 (0.6–2.0) 0.93
3.51–6.5 23 (52.3) 21 (47.7) 1.2 (0.7–2.3) 0.46
>6.51 16 (61.5) 10 (38.5) 1
Time from enrollment to the HIV program and the study interview (in years)
0–0.5 4 (28.6) 10 (71.4) 1.9 (1.1–3.2) 0.02 b b
0.51–1.5 17 (68.0) 8 (32.0) 0.8 (0.4–1.7) 0.64
1.51–4.0 27 (56.3) 21 (43.8) 1.2 (0.7–2.0) 0.59
4.01–8.6 26 (55.3) 21 (44.7) 1.2 (0.7–2.0) 0.53
>8.61 23 (62.2) 14 (37.8) 1

MHI-5: Mental Health Inventory-5 ARVs: Antiretrovirals.

a Four of the seven questions on ARV knowledge received one point and three received 0.25 points, for a correct answer. Incorrect answers, does not know or does not answer gave 0 points. The maximum score for this section was 4.75.

b omitted because of collinearity.

Determinants of not achieving sustained viral suppression

Among 152 participants who were on ARV and who had two viral loads available, 62 (40.8%) did not achieve sustained viral suppression. The bivariate and multivariate analysis of the association of HIV and ARV knowledge and potential determinants of not achieving sustained viral suppression are shown in Table 4. In the bivariate analyses, moderate depression was associated with not achieving sustained viral suppression, this association did not remain in the multivariate analysis. Non-disclosure and being on ARV less than 0.5 years were associated with not achieving sustained viral suppression in the bivariate and multivariate analysis.

Table 4. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of determinants of not achieving sustained viral suppression among people living with HIV in a referral center in Lima, Peru, 2016–2017 (N = 152).

Bivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Sustained viral suppression Not sustained viral suppression PR Crude (95%CI) P value Adjusted PR (95%CI) P value
Knowledge on HIV
Good 45(60.0) 30(40.0) 1 - -
Poor 45(58.4) 32(41.6) 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 0.85
ARVs Knowledge
Good 55(65.5) 29(34.5) 1 1
Poor 35(51.5) 33(48.5) 1.4 (0.9–2.1) 0.08 1.5 (0.8–1.7) 0.47
Age Group
18–27 17(51.5) 16(48.5) 1 - -
28–36 24(58.5) 17(41.5) 0.9 (0.5–1.4) 0.55
37–43 26(66.7) 13(33.3) 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 0.20
> = 44 23(59.0) 16(41.0) 0.8 (0.5–1.4) 0.52
Sex
Male 65(60.2) 43(39.8) 1 - -
Female 25(56.8) 19(43.2) 1.1 (0.7–1.6) 0.70
Marital Status
Married or Cohabiting 27(61.4) 17(38.6) 1 - -
Divorced 3(60.0) 2(40.0) 1.0 (0.3–3.2) 0.95
Single 52(56.5) 40(43.5) 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 0.60
Widowers 8(72.7) 3(27.3) 0.7 (0.3–2.0) 0.51
Educational status
Primary School 6(75.0) 2(25.0) 0.6 (0.2–1.9) 0.34 - -
High School 42(54.6) 35(45.5) 1
University 42(62.7) 25(37.3) 0.8 (0.6–1.2) 0.33
Mental health scale by MHI-5
Not Depressed 41(66.1) 21(33.9) 1 1
Mild Depressed 17(68.0) 8(32.0) 0.9 (0.4–1.8) 0.87 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 0.67
Moderate Depressed 13(43.3) 17(56.7) 1.7 (1.0–2.7) 0.03 1.5 (0.9–2.4) 0.12
Severe Depressed 9(45.0) 11(55.0) 1.6 (0.9–2.8) 0.07 1.5 (0.9–2.5) 0.12
Did not answer 10(66.7) 5(33.3) 1.0 (0.4–2.2) 0.69 1.0 (0.4–2.2) 0.96
Alcoholism screening risk by CAGE
No Abuse 64(59.8) 43(40.2) 1 - -
Risk of Abuse 8(40.0) 12(60.0) 1.5 (1.0–2.3) 0.06
Did not answer 18(72.0) 7(28.0) 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 0.29
Use of illegal drugs
Used in the past 6(50.0) 6(50.0) 1.0 (0.4–2.2) 0.43 - -
Sometimes 6(60.0) 4(40.0) 1.2 (0.7–2.2) 0.51
Never used 74(59.2) 51(40.8) 1
Did not answer 4(80.0) 1(20.0) 0.5 (0.1–2.9) 0.96
Disclosure of HIV diagnosis
At least to someone 82(59.9) 55(40.2) 1 1 -
No one 1(20.0) 4(80.0) 2.0 (1.2–3.2) 0.01 1.8 (1.2–2.9) <0.01
Did not answer 7(70.0) 3(30.0) 0.7 (0.3–2.0) 0.56 0.8 (0.3–2.0) 0.61
Self-perception of support among those disclosing
Supported by someone 55(56.7) 42(43.3) 1 - -
Supported by no one 27(67.5) 13 (32.5) 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 0.26
Did not disclosed 1(20.0) 4(80.0) 1.8 (1.1–3.0) 0.02
Did not answer 7(70.0) 3(30.0) 0.7 (0.3–1.8) 0.46
Time from ARV and the study interview (in years)
<0.5 3 (20.0) 12 (80.0) 2.9 (1.5–5.6) <0.01 2.6 (1.3–5.2) <0.01
0.51–1.5 17(68.0) 8(32.0) 1.1 (0.5–2.7) 0.76 1.1 (0.5–2.5) 0.87
1.51–3.5 27(61.4) 17(38.6) 1.4 (0.7–2.9) 0.39 1.3 (0.6–2.7) 0.50
3.51–6.5 25 (58.1) 18 (41.9) 1.5 (0.7–3.1) 0.28 1.5 (0.7–3.0) 0.28
>6.51 18 (72.0) 7 (28.0) 1 1

MHI-5: Mental Health Inventory-5 ARVs: Antiretrovirals.

Discussion

Among PLWHA attending a referral center in Lima, up to a quarter had gaps in key knowledge on HIV and ARV and 41% had not achieved sustained viral suppression. We also found a high burden of psychosocial problems: 48% of study participants screened positive for any grade of depression and 27% reported feeling unsupported by the person they disclosed to. Moderate depression was associated to poor HIV and ARV knowledge. Non-disclosure was associated with not achieving sustained viral suppression.

In general, HIV and ARV knowledge was high in our study; however, a quarter of the study population had knowledge gaps that could impact HIV care and transmission: 9% believed that they should not use a condom in sexual contact with other PLWH and 12% said that sex with another PLWH does not pose a risk of other infections. Considering that serosorting (choosing a sexual partner that is also living with HIV) is common among PLWH, our result highlights knowledge gaps that might affect this practice [7]. It is important to note, this study was implemented before the launch of the UNAIDS undetectable = untransmittable campaign [21]. The question with the lowest proportion of participants replying correctly was on the knowledge of the higher risk of cancer posed by HIV infection. In Nigeria, poor knowledge on AIDS defining cancers among PLWH has also been described and few participants had undergone cancer screening and they attributed this to the lack of knowledge of its benefits [22]. Further research should test strategies to increase knowledge about their risk of cancer and to increase compliance to screening practices to reduce cancer mortality among PLWH.

We found gaps on ARV knowledge, such as 18% of the population that thought they could make up a missed dose of ARV by taking a double dose the next day. In our study, 8% considered the statement “It is important to discontinue ARV for a few days to rest the body” correct, as compared to 34% of low income latino PLWH in Los Angeles in 2003 [6]; these studies were conducted 15 years apart and even though our populations had a better knowledge, the presence of this beliefs can impact HIV spread and treatment. In our study 86% of participants disagreed with the statement “If I am feeling ok, I can discontinue ARV” which is similar to a 2012 study in Nigeria, where 92% disagreed with the statement: “You should take ARVs only when you feel sick” [8]. It is worrying that some patients, albeit few, do not know the importance of consistent adherence to ARVs.

Depression may affect our ability to understand a disease [23,24]. Depression is a barrier to care and is associated with lower adherence to ARV [25,26]. High frequency of depression among PLWH have been reported in Lima: 68% among HIV-positive impoverished women [27] and 48% among patients with HIV and TB [28]; both studies used the Hopkins Symptoms checklist. In a study using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire depressed HIV patients had a significantly lower quality of life than their no depressed counterparts [29]. In Chile, PLWH with moderate-severe depressive symptoms had three times higher risk of non-adherence compared to patients with mild to no depressive symptoms [30]. The prevalence of depression in 2012 among adults in the general population of Lima, Peru was estimated 17.2% measured with the Mini Mental State Examination [31]. Our study highlights a high frequency of depression (48%) and its role as a determinant of HIV and ARV knowledge in PLWH at a referral center in Lima, which reveals an urgent need to develop interventions to address depression among them. A meta-analysis suggested short-term improvements in depression and a significant reduction in viral load with cognitive behavioral therapy, while another meta-analysis suggested that pharmacological interventions were more effective [32,33]. Finally, during the study Peruvian guidelines for first line ARV included efavirenz, which has been associated with severe depression, suicidal ideation and nonfatal suicide attempts [3436].

The proportion of PLWH that had disclosed their HIV status in our study was high and similar to that reported in a global study among 2035 PLWH where 96% had disclosed and the pooled proportion for Latin America was 92% [37]. In our study non-disclosure was found to be associated with not achieving sustained viral suppression. The relationship between disclosure, adherence and viral suppression remains poorly understood. In a meta-analysis, eleven of seventeen studies reported a positive finding between disclosure and ARV adherence [38]. In a qualitative study in Peru the fear of disclosure was recognized by PLWH as a barrier to adherence to ARV [39]. Disclosure supposedly increases social support, which allows PLWH to cope with health and drug use [40]. However due to HIV-related stigma, disclosure might affect negatively ARV adherence [38] and it has been proposed that rather than promoting disclosure, programs should create supportive environments for PLWH, which might have more of an impact on adherence [41]. In our study 27% reported feeling unsupported by the person they disclosed. Disclosure to supportive persons should be encouraged among PLWH and studies should focus on understanding its association with retention in care.

The 12% risk or high risk of alcoholism found in our study is lower compared to studies among PLWH using the same questionnaire: in Boston, 42% PLWH had a risk or high risk of alcoholism, however, the study selected patients with higher pretest risk [42]. Another study, found that 43% of HIV-infected Peruvian MSM and transgender women had alcohol use disorders and 5% had alcohol dependence using the AUDIT test; both were inversely related to optimal ARV adherence [43]. The CAGE and AUDIT scores have the same sensitivity [44]. In the general population older than 15 years in Peru, 22% report excessive alcohol consumption [45]. Alcohol consumption and substance abuse have been associated to low adherence to ARV and to unsuppressed viremia [9,46].

Forty-one percent did not reach sustained viral suppression. This percentage is lower than the national estimates in which 63% have not achieved viral suppression, defined as <1000 cop/mL [47]. Our study included persons attending a referral hospital and thus we did not include patients not retained in care. Two studies conducted in the same hospital than this study found similar percentages of unsuppressed viremia: one found that 24% had a detectable viral load (defined as a single viral load above 1000 copies/mL including patients with at least 24 weeks on ARV) [48], the other study found that 40% of PLWH had a single detectable viral load (defined as having an viral load above 200 copies/mL within the first year of enrolment in HIV programs) [49]. The two factors associated with not achieving sustained viral suppression were non-disclosure and being on ARVs less than 0.5 years. The association between being on ARVs less than 0.5 years and not achieving sustained viral suppression was expected, since most patients achieve viral suppression after six months of ARVs [50,51].

Our study has several limitations and strengths. The questionnaire to measure HIV and ARV knowledge was not formally validated. However, it was based on validated surveys and questionnaires, developed in consultation with HIV experts and we performed a pilot study to address any misunderstanding. By enrolling participants at the hospital waiting room for their viral load measures we might have overestimated knowledge; since our population did not include PLWH not retained in care. It is estimated that in the study hospital, between 53% and 57% of PLWH are retained in care after one year of entering the HIV Program [52]. Therefore, our results cannot be extrapolated to all the PLWH population but to that retained in care in Lima hospitals. PLWH that accepted to participate in our study may have been more educated than those not participating, since the former might have felt more comfortable replying to a questionnaire on knowledge. However, 43% study participants had completed high school which is comparable with the proportion in Lima (48%) [53]. The strength of our study is that, in addition to measuring knowledge, we surveyed several psychosocial issues that can be key for adherence and viral suppression. Our results allow the generation of several hypotheses related to knowledge, adherence and psychosocial factors among PLWH that can be tested in future studies. For example, if early identification and treatment of depression and encouraging disclosure may increase adherence.

Peruvian guidelines on HIV management recommend that doctors, nurses and a psychologist, should guide PLWH in their care and provide knowledge on HIV treatment and transmission [35]. In 2017, after the study conclusion, a psychiatrist was appointed to the HIV program. We suggest continuing prioritizing access to psychological evaluation and support especially in the identification and management of depression. We also suggest that the burden of other mental disorders and their impact on retention in care among PLWH should be quantified.

This study highlights important gaps in HIV and ARV knowledge and a high burden of psychosocial problems, especially of depression, among PLHW attending HIV care at a referral hospital. Addressing psychosocial factors that may be modified by health interventions, such as depression and disclosure could improve the quality of life among PLWH in Lima and improve HIV specific outcomes. Finally, our findings suggest, that it is necessary to develop interventions to address HIV and ARV knowledge gaps that could impact HIV transmission and treatment success in PLWH in Lima. Larger studies addressing the determinants of HIV and ARV knowledge and factors associated to HIV could test hypotheses resulting from our findings.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Score used to quantify knowledge on HIV and on ARV.

(DOCX)

S1 File. Study database.

(DTA)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the collaboration of Dyana Guardia, RN; Suzette Olivares, RN and Ms. Sandra Bejarano.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Program for Advanced Research Capacities for AIDS in Peru (PARACAS) [grant number D43TW00976301] from the Fogarty International Center at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). UNAIDS DATA 2017. [cited 13 Aug 2018]. Available: from:http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/20170720_Data_book_2017_en.pdf.
  • 2.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Fast-Track Targets. 2014. Available: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC2686_WAD2014report_en.pdf.
  • 3.Banagi Yathiraj A, Unnikrishnan B, Ramapuram JT, Thapar R, Mithra P, Madi D, et al. HIV-Related Knowledge among PLWHA Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital at Coastal South India—A Facility-Based Study. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care JIAPAC. 2017;16: 615–619. doi: 10.1177/2325957417742671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kalichman SC, Pope H, White D, Cherry C, Amaral CM, Swetzes C, et al. Association Between Health Literacy and HIV Treatment Adherence: Further Evidence from Objectively Measured Medication Adherence. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care. 2008;7: 317–323. doi: 10.1177/1545109708328130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kalichman SC, Benotsch E, Suarez T, Catz S, Miller J, Rompa D. Health literacy and health-related knowledge among persons living with HIV/AIDS. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18: 325–331. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00121-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.van Servellen G, Brown JS, Lombardi E, Herrera G. Health Literacy in Low-Income Latino Men and Women Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in Community-Based Treatment Centers. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2003;17: 283–298. doi: 10.1089/108729103322108166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eaton LA, Kalichman SC, Cain DN, Cherry C, Stearns HL, Amaral CM, et al. Serosorting Sexual Partners and Risk for HIV Among Men Who Have Sex with Men. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33: 479–485. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Olowookere SA, Fatiregun AA, Adewole IF. Knowledge and attitudes regarding HIV/AIDS and antiretroviral therapy among patients at a Nigerian treatment clinic. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012;6: 809–816. doi: 10.3855/jidc.2086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heestermans T, Browne JL, Aitken SC, Vervoort SC, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Determinants of adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive adults in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1: e000125. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Joglekar N, Paranjape R, Jain R, Rahane G, Potdar R, Reddy KS, et al. Barriers to ART adherence & follow ups among patients attending ART centres in Maharashtra, India. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134: 954–959. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.92642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hahn JA, Samet JH. Alcohol and HIV Disease Progression: Weighing the Evidence. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010;7: 226–233. doi: 10.1007/s11904-010-0060-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Horberg MA, Silverberg MJ, Hurley LB, Towner WJ, Klein DB, Bersoff-Matcha S, et al. Effects of Depression and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use on Adherence to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy and on Clinical Outcomes in HIV-Infected Patients: JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47: 384–390. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318160d53e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cook JA, Grey D, Burke J, Cohen MH, Gurtman AC, Richardson JL, et al. Depressive Symptoms and AIDS-Related Mortality Among a Multisite Cohort of HIV-Positive Women. Am J Public Health. 2004;94: 1133–1140. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.7.1133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Villes V, Spire B, Lewden C, Perronne C, Besnier J-M, Garré M, et al. The effect of depressive symptoms at ART initiation on HIV clinical progression and mortality: implications in clinical practice. Antivir Ther. 2007;12: 1067–1074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pacifico J, Gutierrez C. Información sobre la medicación y adherencia al tratamiento antirretroviral de gran actividad en pacientes con VIH/SIDA de un hospital de Lima, Perú. Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015;32: 66–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Juarez-Vilchez J, Pozo E. Percepciones sobre comportamientos sexuales de riesgo en personas que viven con VIH/SIDA y reciben tratamiento antiretroviral en Piura, Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Public. 27: 31–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Centro Nacional de Epidemiologia, Prevención y Control de Enfermedades—MINSA. SIDA: Distribución por edad y sexo, 1983–2016. [cited 21 Jan 2020]. Available: http://www.dge.gob.pe/portal/docs/vigilancia/sala/2017/SE02/vih.pdf.
  • 18.Ministerio de Salud. Análisis Situacional de salud 2017 Hospital Cayetano Heredia. [cited 20 Jun 2018]. Available: http://www.hospitalcayetano.gob.pe/PortalWeb/wp-content/uploads/SalaSituacionalEpidemiologica/2017/asisho2017.pdf.
  • 19.Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, Ware JE, Barsky AJ, Weinstein MC. Performance of a Five-Item Mental Health Screening Test: Med Care. 1991;29: 169–176. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199102000-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1984;252: 1905–1907. doi: 10.1001/jama.252.14.1905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). UNDETECTABLE = UNTRANSMITABLE: PUBLIC HEALTH AND HIV VIRAL LOAD SUPPRESSION. [cited 11 Jan 2019]. Available: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/undetectable-untransmittable_en.pdf.
  • 22.Jedy-Agba E, Adebamowo C. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of AIDS associated malignancies among people living with HIV in Nigeria. Infect Agent Cancer. 2012;7: 28. doi: 10.1186/1750-9378-7-28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.N’Goran AA, Pasquier J, Deruaz-Luyet A, Burnand B, Haller DM, Neuner-Jehle S, et al. Factors associated with health literacy in multimorbid patients in primary care: a cross-sectional study in Switzerland. BMJ Open. 2018;8: e018281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression Is a Risk Factor for Noncompliance With Medical Treatment: Meta-analysis of the Effects of Anxiety and Depression on Patient Adherence. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160: 2101. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.14.2101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Costa J de M, Torres TS, Coelho LE, Luz PM. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy for HIV/AIDS in Latin America and the Caribbean: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21: e25066. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Deshmukh N, Borkar A, Deshmukh J. Depression and its associated factors among people living with HIV/AIDS: Can it affect their quality of life? J Fam Med Prim Care. 2017;6: 549. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.222016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu DY, Munoz M, Espiritu B, Zeladita J, Sanchez E, Callacna M, et al. Burden of Depression Among Impoverished HIV-Positive Women in Peru: JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;48: 500–504. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31817dc3e9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shin S, Muñoz M, Espiritu B, Zeladita J, Sanchez E, Callacna M, et al. Psychosocial Impact of Poverty on Antiretroviral Nonadherence Among HIV-TB Coinfected Patients in Lima, Peru. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care. 2008;7: 74–81. doi: 10.1177/1545109708315326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wakawa I, Said J, Abba W, Shehu S, Rabbebe I, Beida O. The impact of comorbid clinical depression on the health-related quality of life of adults on highly active antiretroviral therapy in Maiduguri, northeastern Nigeria. Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36: 408. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.140731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Varela M, Galdames S. Depresión y adhesión a terapia anti-retroviral en pacientes con infección por VIH atendidos en el Hospital San Pablo de Coquimbo, Chile. Rev Chil Infectol. 2014;31: 323–328. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182014000300011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Instituto de Nacional de Salud Mental Honorio Delgado–Hideyo Noguchi. ESTUDIO EPIDEMIOLÓGICO DE SALUD MENTAL DE LIMA Y CALLAO—REPLICACION 2012. [cited 13 Aug 2019]. Available: http://www.insm.gob.pe/investigacion/archivos/estudios/2012%20ASM%20-EESM%20-LM.pdf.
  • 32.Shi Y, Zhao M, Chen S, Wang S, Li H, Ying J, et al. Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on people living with HIV and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health Med. 2019;24: 578–594. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1549739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Passchier RV, Abas MA, Ebuenyi ID, Pariante CM. Effectiveness of depression interventions for people living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review & meta-analysis of psychological & immunological outcomes. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;73: 261–273. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.AIDSinfo. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV. [cited 26 Apr 2019]. Available: https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/contentfiles/lvguidelines/adultandadolescentgl.pdf.
  • 35.Ministerio de salud del Perú. Norma técnica de salud de atención integral del adulto con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). [cited 26 Apr 2019]. Available: http://bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/MINSA/4479.pdf.
  • 36.FDA. HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION: SUSTIVA. [cited 26 Apr 2019]. Available: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/020972s049-021360s038lbl.pdf.
  • 37.Nachega JB, Morroni C, Zuniga JM, Sherer R, Beyrer C, Solomon S, et al. HIV-Related Stigma, Isolation, Discrimination, and Serostatus Disclosure: A Global Survey of 2035 HIV-Infected Adults. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care. 2012;11: 172–178. doi: 10.1177/1545109712436723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Katz IT, Ryu AE, Onuegbu AG, Psaros C, Weiser SD, Bangsberg DR, et al. Impact of HIV-related stigma on treatment adherence: systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16: 18640. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.3.18640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Curioso WH, Kepka D, Cabello R, Segura P, Kurth AE. Understanding the facilitators and barriers of antiretroviral adherence in Peru: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10: 13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smith R, Rossetto K, Peterson BL. A meta-analysis of disclosure of one’s HIV-positive status, stigma and social support. AIDS Care. 2008;20: 1266–1275. doi: 10.1080/09540120801926977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dessie G, Wagnew F, Mulugeta H, Amare D, Jara D, Leshargie CT, et al. The effect of disclosure on adherence to antiretroviral therapy among adults living with HIV in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19: 528. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4148-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Samet JH, Phillips SJ, Horton NJ, Traphagen ET, Freedberg KA. Detecting Alcohol Problems in HIV-Infected Patients: Use of the CAGE Questionnaire. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;20: 151–155. doi: 10.1089/088922204773004860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ferro EG, Weikum D, Vagenas P, Copenhaver MM, Gonzales P, Peinado J, et al. Alcohol use disorders negatively influence antiretroviral medication adherence among men who have sex with men in Peru. AIDS Care. 2015;27: 93–104. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.963013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Geneste J, Pereira B, Arnaud B, Christol N, Liotier J, Blanc O, et al. CAGE, RAPS4, RAPS4-QF and AUDIT Screening Tests for Men and Women Admitted for Acute Alcohol Intoxication to an Emergency Department: Are Standard Thresholds Appropriate? Alcohol Alcohol. 2012;47: 273–281. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/ags027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Instituto nacional de estadística e informática. Peru: enfermedades transmisibles y no transmisibles 2016. [cited 26 Apr 2019]. Available: https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/endes/doc_salud/Enfermedades_no_transmisibles_y_transmisibles_2016.pdf.
  • 46.Cook RL, Zhou Z, Kelso-Chichetto NE, Janelle J, Morano JP, Somboonwit C, et al. Alcohol consumption patterns and HIV viral suppression among persons receiving HIV care in Florida: an observational study. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017;12: 22. doi: 10.1186/s13722-017-0090-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Garcia-Fernandez L, Novoa R, Huaman B, Benites C. Continuo de la atención de personas que viven con VIH y brechas para el logro de las metas 90-90-90 en Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Pública. 2018;35: 491. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2018.353.3853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Alave J, Paz J, González E, Campos M, Rodríguez M, Willig J, et al. Factores asociados a falla virológica en pacientes infectados con VIH que reciben terapia anti-retroviral en un hospital público del Perú. Rev Chil Infectol. 2013;30: 42–48. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182013000100006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Prochazka M, Otero L, Konda KA, González-Lagos E, Echevarría J, Gotuzzo E. Patient-nominated supporters as facilitators for engagement in HIV care in a referral hospital in Peru: A retrospective cohort study. Yotebieng M, editor. PLOS ONE. 2018;13: e0195389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Thompson MA, Aberg JA, Hoy JF, Telenti A, Benson C, Cahn P, et al. Antiretroviral Treatment of Adult HIV Infection: 2012 Recommendations of the International Antiviral Society–USA Panel. JAMA. 2012;308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mujugira A, Celum C, Coombs RW, Campbell JD, Ndase P, Ronald A, et al. HIV Transmission Risk Persists During the First 6 Months of Antiretroviral Therapy: JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72: 579–584. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hoces D, González E, Mejía F, Echevarría J, Gotuzzo E, Seas C. Long-Term Retention in HIV Care: From the “Cascade” of Care to the “Cycle” of Care. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2: 406. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv133.282 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Instituto nacional de estadística e informática. Peru: perfil sociodemográfico informe nacional. [cited 25 Apr 2019]. Available: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1539/libro.pdf.

Decision Letter 0

Avanti Dey

20 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-01332

HIV and antiretroviral treatment knowledge gaps and psychosocial burden among persons living with HIV in Lima, Peru

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Paredes,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers, and their comments are available below.

The reviewers have raised a number of major concerns. Specifically, they request significant improvements to the reporting of methodological aspects of the study, as well as further elaboration on the rationale for the study. They also request clarity to some aspects of the results reported.

Could you please carefully revise the manuscript to address all comments raised?

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 03 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Avanti Dey, PhD

Staff Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: A well-written paper that provides information about the levels of knowledge of HIV and ARV treatment as well as the prevalence of psycho-social factors among consenting PLWH waiting for viral load measurement at the waiting room of a tertiary healthcare institution in Lima, Peru. To further improve the paper quality the following are suggested,

1. The title should be revised to include the fact that the participants were consenting PLWH at the waiting room of the hospital for viral load measurement. This is necessary as there is no sample size estimation and the representativeness as well as the generalisability of the findings are questionable.

2. The rationale for this work needs to be further clarified. The authors mentioned that the level of HIV related knowledge among PLWH has not been quantified, but cited studies that indicated that PLWH understood all information given by their doctors. Besides, qualitative studies on HIV transmission reveals that misconception on HIV transmission exists. The authors should indicate the gap in knowledge that this study was out to bridge.

3. The authors recognised the importance of adherence to ARV as a key to sustained viral suppression in HIV control in their introduction yet did not measure this important variable by any means from the participants in the study. It would have been good to know the role of adherence as a potential confounder or middle variable in the association between viral suppression and knowledge or psychosocial factors.

4. The aspect of the paper which sought to analyse and proved information about the "impact of HIV and ARV knowledge on viral suppression" is not methodologically adequate given the unmeasured adherence level among participants, different samples sizes used for knowledge assessment and viral suppression, and the fact that it's not included as an objective of this study. I, therefore, suggest that the portion be expunged from the paper.

Reviewer #2: The content of the manuscript is scientifically relevant and the findings are in line with similar papers coming out of this region. There are certain issues which I would like to point out..

1) The language has to be considerably improved throughout the manuscript. I would suggest seeking help from an English language editor.

2) Sample size calculation and sampling strategy is not mentioned in the manuscript. Was the sample universal and only those fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included?

3) The scoring assigned for the knowledge section of the questionnaire is not clearly explained and is quite confusing.

4) What is the difference between does not know and do not answer ---is the difference literal?

5) I would suggest retaining the correct responses and arrange it in descending order.

6) Some of the statements under Knowledge regarding ARV are assessing perception, rather than knowledge

7)Class interval chosen for age groups are not uniform? what is the basis for such interval?

8) For tables determining the factors for not achieving viral suppression, the information is non-coherent with loads of variables. The interpretation becomes too difficult.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Akinola Ayoola Fatiregun

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256289.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Jul 2021

To whom it may concern

Thank you very much for your comments. We have addressed each one of your comments/recommendations in the rebuttal letter.

Best regards

Jose Luis Paredes

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 1

Rekha Thapar

4 Aug 2021

HIV and antiretroviral treatment knowledge gaps and psychosocial burden among persons living with HIV linked to care in Lima, Peru

PONE-D-21-01332R1

Dear Dr. Paredes,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Rekha Thapar, MD

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: All previous comments were addressed appropriately. However, the tables will need to be formatted or design in line with the journal's guideline. In addition, definitions of all acronyms used within the table should be provided as table footnotes or legend.

Reviewer #3: Some of my observations and queries:

1) The manuscript needs language edit

2) Authors have failed to mention 171 eligible participants were selected from from what sample ? How many PLHIV were there in the centre during the study period ?

3) Why was the sample size calculation not done ?

4) The knowledge section in the study was a mixture of both knowledge and awareness about HIV / ARV? On what basis was answering 80% of the questions correctly was considered good knowledge?

5) Association between viral suppression and good knowledge is not discussed in the paper.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Akinola Ayoola Fatiregun

Reviewer #3: No

Acceptance letter

Rekha Thapar

11 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-01332R1

HIV and antiretroviral treatment knowledge gaps and psychosocial burden among persons living with HIV in Lima, Peru

Dear Dr. Paredes:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Rekha Thapar

Guest Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Score used to quantify knowledge on HIV and on ARV.

    (DOCX)

    S1 File. Study database.

    (DTA)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES