Abstract
Background
Mazaryun (Daphne oleoides Schreb.) is used as an anti-inflammatory drug in Unani medicine after detoxification, as it is defined under fourth-degree drugs.
Objective(s)
To evaluate and compare the anti-inflammatory activity of crude and detoxified Mazaryun in maximum and minimum doses.
Materials and methods
Anti-inflammatory activity was carried out by carrageenan-induced paw edema test. Wistar rats of either sex, weighing 150–200 gm, were divided into seven groups (I, II, IIIA, IIIB, IVA, IVB, and V) of six animals in each. Group I - plain control, administered with 1 ml of 1% CarboxyMethyl Cellulose (CMC); Group II - standard control, given Diclofenac Sodium (6 mg/kg); Group III - crude Mazaryun and Group IV - detoxified Mazaryun, A and B are maximum and minimum doses of test drug, respectively; and V group - positive control was not treated with any other drugs. The data was statistically analyzed by ANOVA repeated for inter-group analysis and ANOVA one-way for intra-group analysis with post hoc Tukey Kramer multiple comparison test. The GC–MS analysis of crude and detoxified leaves of Mazaryun was also carried out in continuation of study to determine the phytochemical changes before and after detoxification.
Results
Maximum dose of detoxified Mazaryun and standard control groups showed significant anti–inflammatory activity at p < 0.001, and detoxified Mazaryun showed dose-dependent activity. The GC–MS fingerprints showed totally eight different chemical constituents in its crude and detoxified form.
Conclusion
The study standardised the concept of detoxication in Unani medicine, as the detoxified Mazaryun showed significant anti-inflammatory activity and present of totally different chemicals constituents.
Keywords: Unani system of medicine, Mazaryun, Anti-inflammatory activity, Detoxification
1. Introduction
The word "inflammation" is derived from a Latin word “inflammo”, means “I set alight; I ignite, or to set on fire”. In Greek, inflammation is known as a hot thing. The Greek word, phlegmon has been used to define inflammatory lesions within [1,2].
Inflammation is defined as a local protective response of living mammalian or vascularised tissues to injury or infection due to any agent. It is a normal response to disturbed homeostasis caused by infection, injury, and trauma [[2], [3], [4], [5]]. According to Unani concept, Waram( inflammation), is used for a broad term, and refers to any abnormal swelling, be it due to accumulation of blood, pus, water, and flatus [6]. Waram is a swelling that is produced because of absorption (inflow) of some abnormal matter in any organ [7,8].
In Unani medicine, Mazaryun (Daphne oleoides Schreb.) is mentioned under fourth-degree drugs [9] and detoxification is recommended before use [10] as all parts of the plant are poisonous. Skin contact with the sap can cause dermatitis in some people [6]. The leaves of Mazaryun are traditionally used for the treatment of inflammatory disorders [6,11,12]. It has hot and dry temperament in fourth-degree [6,7,13]. Therefore, Unani physicians have advocated some detoxification methods before using Mazaryun for medicinal purpose [6,7,[13], [14], [15], [16], [17]]. If Mazaryun is used without detoxification it may produce severe complications; it may also lead to vomiting and/or diarrhoea [13,14]. Daphne is a genus of around 70-95 species of deciduous and evergreen shrubs in the family Thymelaeaceae, native to Asia, Europe, and North Africa. It is a small multi-branched shrub found in the Western Himalayas. The bark contains diterpenes including mezerein and daphnetoxin (0.02%) [18], [19] of which mezerein is anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic [19]. Previous research studies have reported wound-healing [20], antimicrobial [21] and antioxidant properties [20] of D. oleoides Schreb., but till date no scientific study has been carried out on its crude and detoxified forms to document the comparative pharmacological effect of Mazaryun before and after detoxification. Therefore, the present study was envisaged to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of the crude and detoxified leaves of D. oleoides on carrageenan-induced paw edema in Wistar rats.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Animals
The study was carried out on healthy Wistar rats weighing 150–200 g of either sex. The animals were procured from a registered breeder and allowed to acclimatize for one week. They were housed in clean polypropylene cages at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C), humidity 45–55% with 12 h light–12 h dark cycle throughout the experimental period and were provided with standard diet and water ad libitum unless stated otherwise. The animal care procedures and experimental protocol were in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiment on Animals (CPCSEA). The study was conducted after obtaining the ethical clearance by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) of National Institute of Unani Medicine (NIUM), vide Reg. no. IAEC/06/17/IA/03.
2.2. Chemicals and reagents
All the chemicals used were of analytical grade. Diclofenac Sodium was purchased from Cipla Drug Company and carrageenan from Sigma Aldrich Chemicals Pvt. Limited, Bangalore, India.
2.3. Plant materials and preparation of powder
The leaves of Mazaryun (D. oleoieds Schreb.) were purchased from Dr. Mohd. Afsahul Kalaam, Research Officer Unani RRIUM, Habak, Nasewmbagh Campus, Kashmir University, Srinagar, 190006, India. Acetic acid and Roghan-e-Badam (almond oil) were purchased from an authentic herbal supplier from a local market in Bangalore, India. The leaves of Mazaryun were identified by Dr. S. Noorunnisa Begum, Associate Professor, Centre for Repository of Medicinal Resources (C-RPR) at TransDisciplinary University (TDU) 74/2, Bengalore-64, vide authentication number (FRLHT Acc. No. 5355). A voucher specimen (Ref. no. 77/IA/Res/2020) was deposited in the department of Ilmul Advia (pharmacology), drug museum, NIUM, Bangalore, for future reference. The leaves of Mazaryun were divided into two equal parts - one part was kept crude and another part was detoxified. The leaves selected for detoxification were kept in an earthen pot, and soaked in acetic acid for three consecutive days and nights (72 h) and the acetic acid was changed daily as mentioned in Unani classical literature [6,13]. After completion of 72 h, the Mazaryun was taken out from acetic acid and washed with fresh water and then dried in an oven at 45 °C. Then, the dried leaves were powdered and charb (anointed) with almond oil [6,[12], [13], [14], [15]]. The half crude undetoxified leaves of Mazaryun were simply ground into fine powder at the laboratory of department of Ilmul Advia, NIUM.
2.3.1. Dosage of the drug
The human therapeutic dose of Mazaryun mentioned in Unani classical literature is 3–5 g [13,14,16]. The dose for rats was calculated by dividing it by adult human weight of 60 kg and multiplying it with the conversion factor of 7 to accommodate the surface area of animal [22] and was found to be 0.35 mg/kg for low dose and 0.58 mg/kg for high dose. The dose of the test drug powder for each rat was dissolved in 1 ml of freshly prepared 1% CMC, daily before each administration.
2.4. Carrageenan-induced paw oedema test
This test was carried out by the method of Vogel [23]. Inflammation was induced in animals by carrageenan-induced edema test to find out activity against acute inflammation. Animals were divided into 7 groups of 6 animals in each.
-
1.
Group I- Animals served as plain control and each animal was administered with 1 ml of 1% CMC.
-
2.
Group II- Animals served as standard control and were administered standard drug, Diclofenac Sodium, in the dose of 6 mg/kg BW [24].
-
3.
Group III A- Animals were treated with low dose of crude Mazaryun, 0.35 gm/kg BW.
-
4.
Group IIIB - Animals were treated with crude Mazaryun in high dose, 0.58 gm/kg BW.
-
5.
Group IVA- Animal were treated with detoxified Mazaryun in the low dose, 0.35 gm/kg BW.
-
6.
Group IVB- Animals were treated with detoxified Mazaryun in high dose, 0.58 gm/kg BW.
-
7.
Group V – Animals served as positive control and were not treated with any drugs.
In this model, acute inflammation was induced by sub-plantar injection of 0.1 ml of 1% suspension of carrageenan in normal saline, in rat hind paw of all the following groups: II, IIIA, IIIB, IVA, IVB and V. The test drugs and standard drug were administered 30 min prior to carrageenan injection. The thickness of hind paw was measured by plethysmometric method. Inflammation was observed in animal after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 h of carrageenan injection. The percentage inhibition of inflammatory edema in test and standard groups animals was calculated by the formula described by Newbould (1963), i = 100{1-(a-x)/(b-y)}. [26] The mean paw volume/thickness of test/standard groups was also analysed statistically in comparison with positive control group.
2.5. Collection of data
Paw thickness was measured just before the carrageenan injection, that is, at “0 h” and then carrageenan sub-plantar injection was given, and paw thickness was measured at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h. Increase in paw thickness was measured as the difference in paw thickness at “0 h” and paw thickness at respective hours [25].
The percentage inhibition of inflammatory edema in test and standard control group animals was calculated by the formula described by Newbould (1963), i = 100{1-(a-x)/(b-y)}, where a = Mean hind paw volume of test/standard group animals after carageenan injection, b = Mean hind paw volume of positive control animals after carageenan injection, x = Mean hind paw volume of test/standard group animals before carageenan injection, y = Mean hind paw volume of positive control animals before carageenan injection [26]. The mean paw volume/thickness of test/standard groups was analysed statistically in compression with positive control group by ANOVA test followed by post hoc multiple compression test [27].
2.6. Statistical analysis
The data was analysed by ANOVA repeated for intergroup analysis with post hoc Tukey Kramer multiple comparison test and ANOVA one way for intra-group analysis with post hoc Tukey Kramer multiple comparison test.
2.7. GC–MS analyses
GC–MS analyses were carried out to detect the phytochemical changes in its crude and detoxified forms.
3. Results
The results of the study showed that the mean hind paw thickness of positive control group animals was 0.980 ± 0.013ml at t = 0. After injecting carrageenan into hind paw of these animals, maximum mean hind paw edema was observed with, 1.993 ± 0.013 ml, at the end of 1 h and at the end of 2, 3, 4 and 5 h it was 1.981 ± 0.006, 1.971 ± 0.006, 1.963 ± 0.004, and 1.950 ± 0.007 respectively (Table 1).
Table 1.
Effect of crude and detoxified leaves of Mazaryun on carrageenan-induced paw edema in Wistar rats.
|
Groups |
Dose mg/kg | Rat paw edema volume at different time interval (ml) |
P value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0min | After carrageenan injection |
|||||||
| 1h (Inhibit.%) | 2 h (Inhibit.%) | 3h (Inhibit.%) | 4h (Inhibit.%) | 5h (Inhibit.%) | ||||
| Group I Plain Control |
1 ml of 1%CMC | 0.965 ± 0.018 | 0.970 ± 0.012 | 0.970 ± 0.012 | 0.968 ± 0.013 | 0.965 ± 0.008 | 0.965 ± 0.018 | |
| Group II Standard Control Diclofenac Sodium |
6 mg/kg BW | 0.985 ± 0.014 | 1.491 ± 0.008 (50.9%) | 1.396 ± 0.004 (59.6%) | 1.336 ± 0.008 (65.2%) | 1.306 ± 0.006 (67.9%) | 1.290 ± 0.005 (69.1%) | <0.001 |
| Group IIIA Crude Mazaryun Low dose |
0.35 mg/kg BW | 0.960 ± 0.017 | 1.886 ± 0.014 (10%) | 1.863 ± 0.015 (11.2%) | 1.823 ± 0.013 (14.3%) | 1.781 ± 0.013 (17.8%) | 1.758 ± 0.009 (19%) | <0.001 |
| Group IIIB Crude Mazaryun High dose |
0.58 mg/kg BW | 0.834 ± 0.150 | 1.746 ± 0.016 (11.3%) | 1.695 ± 0.018 (15.3%) | 1.636 ± 0.010 (20.3%) | 1.606 ± 0.008 (22.7%) | 1.591 ± 0.007 (23.2%) | <0.001 |
| Group IVA Detoxified Mazaryun Low dose |
0.35 mg/kg BW | 0.968 ± 0.016 | 1.866 ± 0.019 (12.7%) | 1.833 ± 0.016 (14.9%) | 1.815 ± 0.016 (15.9%) | 1.785 ± 0.012 (18.2%) | 1.763 ± 0.014 (19.3%) | <0.001 |
| Group IVB Detoxified Mazaryun High dose |
0.58 mg/kg BW | 0.973 ± 0.019 | 1.746 ± 0.016 (24.9%) | 1.700 ± 0.016 (28.5%) | 1.641 ± 0.011 (33.6%) | 1.603 ± 0.005 (36.9%) | 1.570 ± 0.012 (39.4%) | <0.001 |
| GroupV Positive Control |
No Treatment |
0.980 ± 0.013 | 1.993 ± 0.008 | 1.981 ± 0.006 | 1.971 ± 0.006 | 1.963 ± 0.004 | 1.950 ± 0.007 | |
| P value | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | ||
Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM (n = 6). Test used ANOVA repeated for intergroup analysis and ANOVA one way for intragroup analysis. Inhibitory rate (%) was listed in the bracket. The “p” value of all intragroup comparison is highly significant = p < 0.001, but comparison between group IIIA vs group IVA and group IIIB vs group IVB the “p” value is not significant = p > 0.05.
In plain control group animals, the paw thickness at t = 0 was 0.965 ± 0.018 ml and this remained almost constant at the end of 5 h (Table 1).
The mean hind paw thickness at t = 0 in the animals of standard control group was 0.985 ± 0.014 ml, and it was shown to increase, 1.491 ± 0.008 ml after injection of carrageenan at the end of 1 h and then gradually decreased to 1.396 ± 0.004, 1.336 ± 0.008, 1.306 ± 0.006, and 1.290 ± 0.005 ml at the end of 2, 3, 4 and 5 h; respectively. The percentage of inhibition in standard control group was 50.9%, 59.6%, 65.2%, 67.9%, and 69.1% at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively. The percentage of inhibition was maximum at the end of 5 h, which was significant at p < 0.001 (Table 1).
In low dose of crude Mazaryun, group IIIA animals, the mean hind paw thickness at t = 0 was 0.960 ± 0.017 and after injection of carrageenan, the mean of hind paw thickness was maximum, 1.886 ± 0.014 ml, at the end of 1 h after which the mean hind paw thickness gradually reduced to 1.863 ± 0.015, 1.823 ± 0.013, 1.781 ± 0.013, and 1.758 ± 0.009 at the end of 2, 3, 4 and 5 h respectively. The percentage of inhibition of edema in this group was found to be 10%, 11.2%, 14.3%, 17.8%, and 19% at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively (Table 1).
In high dose of crude Mazaryun, group IIIB animals, the mean hind paw thickness at t = 0 was 0.834 ± 0.150 ml and after injection of carrageenan, it was maximum, 1.746 ± 0.016, at the end of 1 h after which the mean hind paw thickness gradually reduced to1.695 ± 0.018, 1.636 ± 0.010, 1.606 ± 0.008, and 1.591 ± 0.007 ml at the end of 2, 3, 4 and 5 h respectively. The percentage inhibition of edema in this group was found to be 11.3%, 15.3%, 20.3%, 22.7%, and 23.2% at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 h respectively (Table 1).
In group IVA animals of low dose of detoxified Mazaryun, the mean hind paw thickness was 0.968 ± 0.016 ml at t = 0 and after injection of carrageenan, the mean thickness was found to be maximum, 1.866 ± 0.019 ml, at 1 h and which gradually reduced to 1.833 ± 0.016, 1.815 ± 0.016, 1.785 ± 0.012, and 1.763 ± 0.014 ml at the end of 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively. The percentage inhibition of edema in this group was found to be 12.7%, 14.9%, 15.9%, 18.2%, and 19.3% at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 h respectively (Table 1).
In group IVB animals of high dose of detoxified Mazaryun, the mean hind paw thickness was 0.973 ± 0.019 ml at t = 0 and after injection of carrageenan, the mean hind paw thickness was found to be maximum, 1.746 ± 0.016 ml, at 1 h and gradually reduced to 1.700 ± 0.016, 1.641 ± 0.011, 1.603 ± 0.005, and 1.570 ± 0.012 ml at the end of 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively. The percentage of inhibition of edema in this group was found to be 24.9%, 28.5%, 33.6%, 36.9%, and 39.4% at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 h respectively (Table 1).
When the results of all the groups were compared, it was found that the mean hind paw thickness was maximum in positive control group animals at 1 h. When the percentage inhibition of all the groups were compared at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h, it was found that the Mazaryun in high dose showed significant percentage inhibition than the other groups, except standard control group, as the percentage inhibition of edema in standard control group was found to be highly significant p < 0.001. When the mean hind paw thickness was compared with plain control among the group, it was found that the mean hind paw thickness of high dose of detoxified Mazaryun and standard control group were towards plain control group, and standard control group showed more significant reduction in edema when compared to all the groups. The mean hind paw thickness of group IVB showed significant reduction in edema when compared to IIIA, IIIB, IVA, and V groups (Table 1).
The results of GC–MS fingerprints showed a total of eight different chemical constituents in its crude and detoxified forms (Table 2, Table 3) The β-Amyrin and α-Amyrin were found to be present only in detoxified form and their concentration was more than the other chemical constituents, i.e., 29.123% and 47.946% respectively (Table- 3). The details of GC-MS analysis with structural elucidation of components is under the process of publication.
Table 2.
GC–MS of crude Mazaryun (before detoxification).
| Sl.No. | Retention Time | Name of the compound | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | % of compound |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.966 | Thiohydroxylamine, S-benothiazol-2-yl-N,N-dicyclohexyl- | C19H26N2S2 | 346 | 5.050% |
| 2 | 49.480 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 | 256 | 11.106% |
| 3 | 49.944 | Cyclopropanamine, 2-phenyl-, trans- | C9H11N | 133 | 9.349% |
| 4 | 51.227 | 9,12-Hexadecadienoic acid, methyl ester | C17H30O2 | 266 | 9.730% |
| 5 | 51.481 | Oxacycloheptadec-8en-2-one, (8Z) | C16H28O2 | 252 | 6.088% |
| 6 | 51.576 | 9,12,15-Octadecatriennoic acid, (Z, Z, Z)- | C18H30O2 | 278 | 35.580% |
| 7 | 56.227 | Sucrose Octa acetate | C28H38O19 | 678 | 14.866% |
| 8 | 57.039 | Heptasiloxane, hexadecamethyl- | C16H48O6Si7 | 532 | 8.231% |
Table 3.
GC–MS of detoxified Mazaryun (after detoxification).
| Retention Time | Name of the compound | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | % of compound | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47.992 | Phthalic acid, butyl isohexyl ester | C18H26O4 | 306 | 4.591% |
| 2 | 49.474 | 3,7-Dimethyl-8-oxo-1,5-dioxa-spiro (5.5) undecane-3-carboxylic acid, methyl ester | C13H20O5 | 256 | 2.205% |
| 3 | 50.087 | Methyl2,3,4-tri-O-acetyl-6-O-ethyl-α-d-mannopyranoside | C15H24O9 | 348 | 2.290% |
| 4 | 50.320 | 4-(diethoxyphosphinoyl)-N-(prop-2′-enyl) butanamide | C11H22NO4P | 263 | 2.125% |
| 5 | 51.525 | Oleic anhydride | C36H66O3 | 546 | 8.333% |
| 6 | 53.570 | 3-Ethoxy-1,1,1,5,5,5-hexamethyl-3-(trimethylsiloxy) trisiloxane | C11H32O4Si4 | 340 | 3.586 |
| 7 | 54.316 | Β-Amyrin | C30H50O | 426 | 29.123% |
| 8 | 57.863 | α-Amyrin | C30H50O | 426 | 47.946% |
4. Discussion
Unani medicine offers many anti-inflammatory drugs, and the test drug, Mazaryun is one of them, mentioned under the fourth-degree drugs [9] and detoxification is recommended before use [10]. It possesses pharmacological properties like purgative [6,13,28,29], anti-inflammatory [6,7,16,28], anti-pyretic [20], anti-helmenthic., [16], Mudirr (diuretic) [16], corrosive [6,14], detergent [16,30], and Mujaffif (siccative) [6]. This drug has been investigated for various pharmacological actions like, wound-healing, antimicrobial, and antioxidant, but scientific data on its anti-inflammatory property is lacking. Therefore, the present study was envisaged to validate the concept of detoxification by evaluating the inflammatory properties of crude and detoxified leaves of Mazaryun, in animal model. The results of the study were compared between the plain and standard control with the minimum and maximum doses of test drug, to find out the dose-dependant effect if any.
In contemporary medicine, Waram or Iltehab may be correlated with the concept of inflammation; however, if the comprehensive concept of Waram is considered, the contemporary concept of inflammation may be a sub-type of Waram. In contemporary medicine, inflammation can be defined as a defensive mechanism of the body to prevent spread of the disease throughout the body. Inflammation is caused by biological agents like bacteria, viruses, parasites, fungi etc.; chemical agents like strong acids, alkalis, poisons, and any chemicals which may result in tissue damage; physical agents like soft tissue injuries, fractures, heat including burns, and cold; and mechanical agents like trauma, presence of foreign body, ligature, and dead tissues [2,31].
The results of this test in plain control (Group I), showed that the paw thickness at t = 0 was 0.965 ± 0.018 ml and that remained almost constant at the end of 5 h. However, in positive control animals (Group V), at t = 0, the mean hind paw thickness was 0.980 ± 0.013 ml, after injecting carrageenan into the hind paw of these animals, and showed maximum mean hind paw edema at the end of 1 h, 1.993 ± 0.013 ml, and at the end of 2, 3, 4, and 5 h it was 1.981 ± 0.006, 1.971 ± 0.006, 1.963 ± 0.004, and 1.950 ± 0.007 respectively. In positive control, induction of edema was maximum because carrageenan is a strong chemical used for the release of inflammatory and pro-inflammatory mediators (prostaglandins, leukotrienes, histamine, bradykinin, TNF- α, etc.) [27]. The edema formation in the paw may be the result of synergism between these inflammatory mediators that increased vascular permeability and/or the mediators that increased the blood flow [32]. The course of acute inflammation is biphasic; the first phase starts with the release of histamine, serotonin, and kinins after the injection of phlogistic agent in the first few hours [33], while the second phase is related to the release of prostaglandins-like substances in 2–3 h. Prostaglandins are the main culprit responsible for acute inflammation [34].
The results of the standard control (Group II) showed 0.985 ± 0.014 ml mean hind paw thickness at t = 0 and it increased to 1.491 ± 0.008 ml after injection of carrageenan, at the end of 1 h, and then gradually decreased to 1.396 ± 0.004, 1.336 ± 0.008, 1.306 ± 0.006, and 1.290 ± 0.005 ml, at the end of 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively. The percentage inhibition in standard control group was 50.9%, 59.6%, 65.2%, 67.9%, and 69.1% at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively. In this group of rats, the percentage inhibition of inflammatory edema was found to be maximum at the end of 5 h, which was significant at p < 0.001.The standard control group animals showed more significant reduction in edema compared to all the groups (Table- 1). This may be because the standard drug, Diclofenac Sodium, is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent which may responsible for the blockage of prostaglandins and inflammatory pathway because the second phase of acute inflammation is sensitive to both the clinically useful steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent [35].
The results of minimum dose crude Mazaryun (Group IIIA) showed 10%, 11.2%, 14.3%, 17.8%, and 19% inhibition of edema at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively whereas, the maximum dose crude Mazaryun (group IIIB) showed 11.3%, 15.3%, 20.3%, 22.7%, and 23.2% of inhibition at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively. This result revealed that the leaves of crude Mazaryun in maximum dose possess better anti-inflammatory activity than in minimum dose.
The results of minimum dose detoxified Mazaryun (Group IV A) showed 12.7%, 14.9%, 15.9%, 18.2%, and 19.3% inhibition of edema at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively, whereas the animals of maximum dose detoxified Mazaryun (Group IV B) showed 24.9%, 28.5%, 33.6%, 36.9%, and 39.4% inhibition of edema at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h respectively. This result revealed that the detoxified Mazaryun in maximum dose possesses significant anti-inflammatory activity than the detoxified Mazaryun in minimum dose.
Moreover, the study was carried out in Wistar rats of either sex to explore any difference in the anti-inflammatory effect of detoxified Mazaryun in both male and female rats; however, there was no such difference found, and the results were same in both the sex.
The GC–MS analysis of crude and detoxified leaves of Mazaryun was carried out in continuation of this study, and the GC–MS fingerprints showed a total of eight different chemical constituents in its crude and detoxified form; β-Amyrin and α-Amyrin were present in detoxified form in more concentration, 29.123% and 47.946% respectively, and presence of saponins was also detected in qualitative phytochemical analysis in its detoxified form [36]. These results are in accordance with many scientific studies which reported that the plants containing β -Amyrin and α-Amyrin possess anti-inflammatory activity [37]. Many scientific studies have been reported that the saponins possess anti-inflammatory activity [38]. Therefore, the significant anti-inflammatory activity of detoxified Mazaryun than the crude Mazaryun may be due the presence of its active components, β-Amyrin, α-Amyrin, and saponins, after its detoxification.
When the percentage inhibition of edema was compared in all the groups, at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 h, it was found that the Mazaryun in maximum dose (Group IVB) possesses significant anti-inflammatory activity than IIIA, IIIB, IVA, and V groups but was found to be less significant when compared with the Group II. The mean hind paw thickness of maximum dose detoxified Mazaryun and standard control group were towards plain control group. If these results are analyzed according to the contemporary action of anti-inflammatory drugs, then it can be hypothesized that Mazaryun whether, detoxified in minimum dose or maximum dose may block the prostaglandins and inflammatory pathway, as that of standard drug Diclofenac Sodium, or may possess other actions including inhibition of lipoxygenase, superoxide radical production and superoxide scavenging, effects on neutrophil aggregation and adhesion, cytokine production, and cartilage metabolism [39]. Diclofenac is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the phenylacetic acid class and similar to other NSAIDs, diclofenac is associated with serious dose-dependent gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal adverse effects with the symptoms like headache, dizziness, stomach pain, diarrhoea, rashes, etc. [39] Therefore, research should be carried out on different doses of leaves of detoxified Mazryun to developed as a safe anti-inflammatory drug for the treatment of patients with acute and chronic pain.
In Unani medicine, the Haad auram and soft auram can be correlated with contemporary concept of acute inflammation and are recommended to be treated with the drugs which possess Mohallil (resolving), Mujaffif (siccative), Qabiz (astringent), and Rade (excretory) drugs [15,40]. The drugs which possess hot and dry temperament are also strongly advised by Unani physicians, to be used in Haad and soft auram (acute inflammations) so as to remove the moisture present in soft auram. The test drug, Mazaryun, is said to possess the Mohallil (resolving) [6,39] and Qabiz (astringent) properties, and also belongs to the class of hot and dry fourth-degree drugs [12]. Therefore, it may resolve the morbid inflammatory matter by virtue of its hot temperament, and it produced Tafarruq (separation) in the morbid humours and removed away these matters in the form of vapours, as its dry temperament desiccates the moisture of morbid matter, or it removes the morbid inflammatory matter by idrar (excretion) or this action of the drug may be due to its specific form or structure which is known as Surat-e-nawiya. [41].
5. Conclusion
From the above results and discussion, it can be concluded that the leaves of Mazaryun in detoxified form exhibited significant anti-inflammatory activity in a dose-dependent manner than its crude form, by virtue of its Mohallil, Qabiz, and Rade properties; hot and dry temperament in fourth-degree, and due the presence of phytochemicals, especially β-Amyrin and α-Amyrin. The contemporary anti-inflammatory drugs like, NSAIDs are associated with many undesirable complications. Hence, there is a need to find out alternatives to current widely used NSAIDs and further research should be carried out at different doses of detoxified Mazaryun to have a cost-effective anti-inflammatory drug with reduced toxicity and side-effects to improve clinical utility.
Source(s) of funding
This research study was carried out from institutional grants of National Institute of Unani Medicine (NIUM), Ministry of AYUSH, Govt. of India (Grant number: 3287 Scheme).
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgement
Authors are extremely thankful to Prof. Abdul Wadud, Director, NIUM for providing best possible facilities for smooth proceeding of this research study.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Transdisciplinary University, Bangalore.
References
- 1.Mayer L., Bhikha R. The challenging response of physis to inflammation. Tibb Inst. Sci. Med. 2013;Part 4:1–63. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Datta B.N. 2nd ed. JBMP; 2004. Textbook of pathology. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bezabeh M., Tesfaye A., Ergicho B., Erke M., Mengistu S., Bedane A. Collaboration with the Ethiopia public health training initiative, the Carter Centre, the ETH. MOH. and the ETH. MOE; 2004. General pathology. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Colledge N.R., Walker B.R., Ralston S.H. 21st ed. 2010. Davidson's principles and of practice of medicine. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mohan H. 5th ed. JBMP; 2005. Text book of pathology. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sina I. Alqanoon fit tib. (Vol. 2nd) (Urdu translation by GH kantoori). IKS YNM.
- 7.Tabri AABSR . Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 2010. Firdoos-ul-hikmat. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Majoosi AHAIAM . Kaamil-us-Sana’ah. (Urdu translation by GH Kantoori) 2nd. Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rahman S., Jahan N., Makbul S.A.A., Ahmad M., Gani M.A. Scientific appraisal of Unani concept of islah-e-advia (rectification/purification of drugs) and its importance. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020:112880. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rahman S., Jahan N., Klam M.A. EJPMR; 2020. Mazaryun (Daphne oleoides Schreb.) an import Unani drug: a review. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khan M.A. CCRUM. MOHFW.GOI; New Delhi: 2012-2013. Muheet-e-Aazm. Vol-1st & 3rd. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ghani N. Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 2011. Khazain-ul-Advia. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baitar I. Aljame-ul-Mufradat Al Advia wal aghziya (Urdu). 4th vol. CCRUM; New Delhi: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Syed MH. Tohfat-ul-Mominin. Hasani Pub. house; 1272
- 15.Boghdadi I.H. Almukhtarat fit tib. 2nd vol. CCRUM; New Delhi: 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kabeeruddin M. Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 2007. Makhzanul mufradat. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kabeeruddin M. Bayaze kabeer. Part-1st and 3rd. Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khare C.P. Springer PVT. LTD; 2007. Indian Medicinal plants. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nandkarni K.M. Indian MateriaMedica. 1st vol. Popular Prakashan PVT. LTD; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Riaz M., SaiqueSleem A., Siddique S., Khan B.A., Nur-e-Alam M., Shahzad-ul-Hussain S. Phytochemistry of Daphne oleoides. J.Nat.Prod.R. 2016;30(8):880–897. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2015.1092146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Uysal A., Zengin G., Aktumsek A., Rigano D., Senatore F., Sanda M.A. Daphne Oleoides: an alternative source of important sesquiterpenes. Int Jfood prop. 2017;20(3):549–559. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Freireich E.J., Gehan E.A., Rall D.P., Schmidt L.H., Skipper H.E. Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anti-cancer agent in mouse, rat, dog, monkey and men. Cancer Chemother. For Rep. 1968;50(4) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vogel H.G. Drug discovery and evaluation. chapter H. Springer PVT; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nair A.B., Jacob S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. JBCP. 2016 doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.177703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thennarasan S., Murugesan S., Chidambaranathan N., Sivamurugan V. Analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic activity of the methanol extracts of Brown alga labophoravaiegata (J.V. Lamouroux) womersley ex E.C. Oliveir. AJPCT. 2016;4(2):42–57. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Newbould BB. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1963;21:127–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1963.tb01508.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Amdekar S., Roy P., Singh V., Kumar A., Singh R., Sharma P. Anti-inflammatory activity of lactobacillus on carrageenan-induced paw edema in male wistar rats. Int JInflamm. 2012;2012:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2012/752015. 752015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Antaki D. TazkeraUlilAlbab, 1st vol. CCRUM; New Delhi: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hakeem M.A. BustanulMufradat. Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saeed A. Kitab al fatah-fit-tadawi (Urdu translation) NCPC Printers. 2007;1 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sina I. The canon of medicine (English translation by mazhar H) Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dey N.C., Dey T.K. A Textbook of Pathology. 15th ed. New Central Book Agency; Calcutta: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roy S., Acharya R., Mandal N.C., Barman S., Ghosh R., Roy R. A comparative antibacterial evaluation of raw and processed Guñjā (Abrusprecatorius Linn.) seeds. Anc.Sci. Life. 2012;32(1):20. doi: 10.4103/0257-7941.113794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bhukya B., Anreddy R.N., William C.M., Gottumukkala K.M. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of leaf extract of KydiacalycinaRoxb. Banglades J.Pharmacol. 2009;4(2):101–104. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Brooks P.M., Day R.O. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs–differences and similarities. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(24):1716–1725. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106133242407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rahman S. Detoxification and pharmacological evaluation of Mazaryun. Thesis submitted under the guidance of Dr Najeeb Jahan, in RGUHS, Bengaluru, Karnataka: 2020
- 37.Okoye N.N., Ajaghaku D.L., Okeke H.N., Ilodigwe E.E., Nworu C.S., Okoye F.B. Beta-Amyrin and alpha-amyrin acetate isolated from the stem bark of Alstoniaboonei display profound anti-inflammatory activity. Pharm Biol. 2014;52(11):1478–1486. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2014.898078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Navarro P., Giner R.M., Recio M.C., Máñez S., Cerdá-Nicolás M., Rıos J.L. In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of saponins from Bupleurum rotundifolium. Life Sci. 2001;68(10):1199–1206. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(00)01019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bennet P.N., Brown M.J., Sharma P. Churchill Livingstone; London: 2012. Clinical pharmacology. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Qureshi H.E. Muqaddama Ilmul Advia. Idara Kitab-us-Shifa; New Delhi: 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lateef A. Tauzihaat-e-Kulliyat-e-Advia. Ibn Sina Academy; Aligarh: 2010. [Google Scholar]
