Abstract
Due to a planned export from a combined bull and boar station, more than 70 boars and 100 bulls were examined by tuberculin tests. Distinct reactions to avian tuberculin appeared in about half of the animals. Many of them also reacted to bovine tuberculin. For diagnostic purposes, many of the reactors were slaughtered, and samples from these and from the environment were examined bacteriologically. Strains of Mycobacterium avium were isolated from only 2 out of 14 reacting boars and from none of the 23 reacting bulls. No isolation of Mycobacterium bovis was made. However, atypical mycobacterial strains, classified as Runyon Group III and IV, were isolated from 3 boars, 2 bulls, 1 pigeon and from many samples of sawdust. The isolation of identical fast-growing mycobacterial strains from the sawdust used in the pens for the reacting boars and bulls, was especially remarkable. The strains differed enzymatically and biochemically from those isolated from other sources. This indicated a possible sensitization of the animals with similar mycobacterial strains. Possible cross-reactions to avian and bovine tuberculin were investigated in tuberculin assays with guniea pigs and pigs sensitized to one of the mycobacterial strains isolated. Distinct reactions to both avian and bovine tuberculin appeared in all the animals. From these results it was concluded that the tuberculin reactions in the boars and the bulls were not due to any tuberculous infection in the herd, but to a sensitization of the animals with atypical mycobacteria.
Keywords: tuberculin reactions, atypical mycobacteria, sawdust, bull, boar
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).
References
- Beerwerth W, Popp K. Zur epizootologischen Bedeutung der Sage- mehleinstreu fur das Auftreten der Schweinetuberkulose. (Epizootiological significance of sawdust bedding for the occurrence of tuberculosis in pigs). Zbl. Vet.-Med. B 1971, 18, 634-645. Kappler, W.: Uber die Verbreitung einer „sauren” Phosphatase inner- halb der Gattung Mycobacterium. (On the occurrence of “acid” phosphatase in mycobacteria). Beitr. Klin. Tuberk. 1964;129:210–213. doi: 10.1007/BF02144792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kubica G P, Jones W D, Abbott V D, Beam R E, Kilburn J O, Carter J C. Differential identification of mycobacteria. I. Tests on catalase activity. Amer. Rev. resp. Dis. 1966;94:400–405. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1966.94.3.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Runyon E H. Anonymous mycobacteria in pulmonary disease. Med. Clin. N. Amer. 1959;43:273–290. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)34193-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vhlemann J, Held R, Muller K, Diirrling H. Schweinetuberkulose in einem Mastkombinat nach Einstreu von Hobel- und Sage- spanen. (Swine tuberculosis in a fattening unit following use of wood shawing and sawdust for litter). Mh. Vet.-Med. 1975;30:175–180. [Google Scholar]
- Virtanen S. Acta tuberc. scand. 1960. A study of nitrate reduction by mycobacteria. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wayne L G. Recognition of Mycobacterium fortuitum by means of a three-days phenolphtalein test. Amer. J. clin. Path. 1961;36:185–187. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/36.2_ts.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wayne L G, Doubek J R, Russel R L. Classification and identification of mycobacteria. I. Tests employing Tween 80 as substrate. Amer. Rev. resp. Dis. 1964;90:588–597. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1964.90.4.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]