Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1977 Dec 1;18(4):572–574. doi: 10.1186/BF03548424

Genetic Variations in the Antibody Response in Young Bulls

Øystein Lie 1,
PMCID: PMC8377690  PMID: 596336

Abstract

Considerable evidence for the existence of a direct genetic control of the immune response has been presented during recent years. Experimental work with rodents are the main basis for this evidence. The first study on genetic variations in the antibody response was carried out by Gorer & Schütze (1938). Later Cinader (1960) published detailed considerations about the specificity and inheritance of the antibody response. In mice it has been demonstrated that a few dominant immune response (Ir) genes determine the ability to produce antibodies against certain specific antigens (McDevitt & Tyan 1968). The magnitude of the response is probably under the influence of polygenes, which are not associated with Ir genes. This theory is supported by selection for high and low antibody production in mice (Biozzi et al. 1972).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (634.8 KB).

References

  1. Foggie A. Studies on the infectious agent of tick-borne fever in sheep. J. Path. Bact. 1951;63:1–15. doi: 10.1002/path.1700630103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foggie A. The effect of tick-borne fever on the resistance of lambs to Staphylococci. J. comp. Path. 1956;66:278–285. doi: 10.1016/s0368-1742(56)80029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Foggie A. Studies on the relationship of tick-bite to tick pyaemia of lambs. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 1959;53:27–34. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1959.11685895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Foster W N M, Cameron A E. Observations on ovine strains of tick-borne fever. J. comp. Path. 1970;80:429–436. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(70)90075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foster W N M, Cameron A E. Observations on the functional integrity of neutrophil leucocytes infected with tick-borne fever. J. comp. Path. 1970;80:487–491. doi: 10.1016/0021-9975(70)90081-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gordon W S, Brownlee A, Wilson D R, MacLeod J. The epizootio-logy of louping-ill and tick-borne fever with observations on the control of these sheep diseases. Symp., Zool. Soc, London. 1962;6:1–27. [Google Scholar]
  7. Meulemans O. Determination of total protein in spinal fluid with sulphosalisylic acid and trichloroacetic acid. Clin. chim. Acta. 1960;5:757–761. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(60)90020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Waldeland H. Toxoplasmosis in sheep. Haematological, serological and parasitological studies. Acta vet. scand. 1977;18:248–256. doi: 10.1186/BF03548453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Øverås J. Studies on immunity to tick-borne fever in sheep in Norway. Nord. Vet.-Med. 1962;14:620–630. [Google Scholar]
  10. Øverås J. Sjukdom hos sau på Ixodes ricinus infisert beite. (Diseases in sheep kept on Ixodes ricinus infected pastures). Norsk Vet.-T. 1972;83:561–567. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES