Abstract
Ultradian glucocorticoid rhythms are highly conserved across mammalian species, however, their functional significance is not yet fully understood. Here we demonstrate that pulsatile corticosterone replacement in adrenalectomised rats induces a dynamic pattern of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding at ~3,000 genomic sites in liver at the pulse peak, subsequently not found during the pulse nadir. In contrast, constant corticosterone replacement induced prolonged binding at the majority of these sites. Additionally, each pattern further induced markedly different transcriptional responses. During pulsatile treatment, intragenic occupancy by active RNA polymerase II exhibited pulsatile dynamics with transient changes in enrichment, either decreased or increased depending on the gene, which mostly returned to baseline during the inter-pulse interval. In contrast, constant corticosterone exposure induced prolonged effects on RNA polymerase II occupancy at the majority of gene targets, thus acting as a sustained regulatory signal for both transactivation and repression of glucocorticoid target genes. The nett effect of these differences were consequently seen in the liver transcriptome as RNA-seq analysis indicated that despite the same overall amount of corticosterone infused, twice the number of transcripts were regulated by constant corticosterone infusion, when compared to pulsatile. Target genes that were found to be differentially regulated in a pattern-dependent manner were enriched in functional pathways including carbohydrate, cholesterol, glucose and fat metabolism as well as inflammation, suggesting a functional role for dysregulated glucocorticoid rhythms in the development of metabolic dysfunction.
Author summary
Adrenal glucocorticoid hormones are released in a characteristic ultradian rhythm that becomes dysregulated during chronic stress, disease, or synthetic corticosteroid treatment. Metabolic dysfunction is a comorbidity associated with all these conditions, but the role that altered glucocorticoid dynamics play is unknown. As the liver is a major site of glucocorticoid action on metabolic homeostasis regulated by the glucocorticoid receptor, we have assessed how different patterns of hormone replacement in adrenalectomised rats differentially regulate gene pathways involved in type II diabetes, cirrhosis, and fatty liver development, via altering the pattern of glucocorticoid receptor binding to regulatory sites. We believe our findings have important implications for therapies that can reproduce the endogenous glucocorticoid rhythm and thus minimize adverse metabolic side-effects in patients.
Introduction
In mammals, glucocorticoid (GC) release from the adrenal glands is under the regulation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis [1]. Entrained to the photoperiod, and regulated by the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus [2], maximal GC release occurs prior to awakening and gradually decreases throughout the active period before returning to basal levels at the onset of the inactive period, in a classical 24 hr circadian profile. The vast majority of GC rhythm research has focussed on this circadian profile using 6–12 hr data collection intervals, however, automated blood microsampling at 10 min intervals has led to the detection of a pronounced underlying rhythm of rising and falling phases with a periodicity of 56–60 min for corticosterone (CORT) in rat [3] and 95–180 min for cortisol in man [4,5]. The origin of the ultradian rhythm within the circadian rhythm has been shown both mathematically and experimentally to emerge as a consequence of a sub-hypothalamic pulse generator, where intrinsic delays in pituitary adrenal communication exist in both the positive feed-forward and negative feedback arms of the loop [6]. As GC oscillations are highly conserved across mammalian species [7], and bioavailable ‘free’ GC pulses can be detected by microdialysis in the extracellular fluid of a variety of tissues [8,9] in experimental rodents and in man [10,11], we propose that this dynamic hormone signal may be crucial for optimal tissue specific responses to GC secretion throughout the body.
Adrenal GCs regulate multiple physiological processes via regulation of glucocorticoid receptors present in almost all tissues of the body, thus affecting immunological and stress responses, cognitive processes, cardiovascular regulation, and a range of metabolic processes including glucose, lipid, fatty acid and triglyceride homeostasis. GCs promote gluconeogenesis in the liver, whereas they decrease glucose uptake and utilisation in skeletal muscle and white adipose tissue by antagonising insulin response. Excess GC exposure causes hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance. GCs also regulate glycogen metabolism [12]. Associations between elevated circulating GCs and metabolic disease are well known. For example, Cushing’s disease, which is characterised by hypercortisolism, is associated with a myriad of metabolic co-morbidities including increased visceral fat deposits, obesity and dyslipidaemia; furthermore, type II diabetes occurs in at least a third of Cushing’s patients [13]. Synthetic GCs (sGCs), which are often more potent and have longer plasma half-lives than their endogenous counterparts [14,15], can cause a similar pattern of adverse metabolic side effect. Patients prescribed GC treatment have a higher incidence of metabolic disease, including diabetes, compared to patients on other medications [16–19]. There has been considerable investigation of the mechanisms underlying these side effects over the past decade and whilst dose is certainly a well-recognised risk factor, efforts to reduce doses towards physiological levels is often insufficient to prevent the development of metabolic disturbance over a prolonged period [20]. GCs regulate gene transcription in target cells via a ligand activated transcription factor, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Activated GR is directed to specific sites across the genome, either by direct binding to short consensus DNA sequences termed glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) or via tethering by other transcription factors. GR then recruits co-factors such as the histone acetyl transferase enzymes CBP/P300 and the ATP-dependent Swi/Snf chromatin remodelling complex to reposition nucleosomes and allow increased accessibility for RNA polymerase II (RNAPol2) and related transcriptional machinery to the transcriptional start site (TSS) of target genes [21,22]. Conversely, decreased access of RNAPol2 to the TSS of target genes results in transcriptional down-regulation. In this way, GCs can induce either up-regulation or down-regulation of a vast number of target genes in a highly gene-specific, cell-specific and context-specific manner.
Studies using high-dose pulsed CORT treatment in adrenalectomised rats [23] have demonstrated that GR binds transiently to GREs regulating the transcription of the ‘hypersensitive’ Period 1 gene [24] in multiple cells and tissues throughout the body and brain [14,25,26]. In rat liver, GR binding at Per1 regulatory GREs reached maximal levels at the peak of an hourly induced CORT pulse before fully dissociating within the 40 min period of CORT clearance from the circulation [14]. Despite the supraphysiological CORT dose, synchronised recruitment and loss from the DNA template was repeated over the series of pulses and was found to induce similarly synchronised, if slightly delayed, enrichment of RNAPol2 at the Per1 TSS and hnRNA production within liver [14] as well as brain tissue [25] which was consistent with observations in a variety of cell lines [14,25–28]. More recently, assessment of genome-wide GR binding and RNAPol2 enrichment at the TSS in a murine mammary cell line (3617) revealed recruitment and loss synchronised to ultradian corticosterone replacement patterns at a vast number of targets, and these dynamics were ablated by constant CORT treatment [28]. What has remained unknown, until now, is how these genome-wide dynamics are affected during ultradian versus constant CORT exposure in a live animal. Furthermore, as it is now well accepted that cell-specific chromatin architecture will pre-determine a different GC-target transcriptome in liver compared to 3617 cells, it is extremely important to assess how transcriptional regulation of physiologically relevant GC-target genes associated with metabolic function are affected by disrupted GC exposure and how this may relate to metabolic function / dysfunction in the whole animal.
Here, we demonstrate that genome-wide GR binding dynamics in liver are tightly regulated by a pulsatile CORT infusion (PULS). In contrast, a dose-matched constant CORT infusion (CONS) results in widespread disruption of ultradian GR dynamics, with subsequent impact upon RNAPol2 recruitment to liver-specific GC regulated genes and significant pattern dependent effects on the GC regulated liver transcriptome. We have identified key metabolic targets that are sensitive to altered CORT exposure, thus highlighting metabolic pathways that are acutely susceptible to GC dysregulation, with implications for the development of the clinically important metabolic syndrome in patients.
Results
Validation of pulsatile and constant corticosterone infusion in adrenalectomised rats
To model a physiologically realistic ultradian CORT replacement pattern in adrenalectomised rats, we based our PULS on the endogenous CORT profile during the peak secretory phase, as determined by frequent blood sampling of adrenally intact male rats at 10 min intervals over a 28 hr period (Fig 1A). As CORT pulses are not synchronised between rats (Figs 1B and S1A–S1E), the underlying ultradian rhythm is only evident within individual CORT profiles (Fig 1B) and most marked during maximal circadian CORT secretion (Fig 1C). To recapitulate these endogenous ultradian CORT rhythms, 20 min CORT infusions were delivered hourly. Blood sampling at 10 min intervals showed CORT levels rising for 20 min, before falling rapidly as CORT was cleared from the circulation. This pattern was robustly repeated over the 3 hr experimental time course, averaging 374 ± 24 ng/ ml at pulse peak (20 min into each hour) and 64 ± 6 ng/ ml at pulse nadir (every 60 min) (Fig 1D).
CONS was dose matched to PULS and confirmed by area under the curve analysis. After the initial transient increase between 0–20 min in circulating CORT (maximal 353 ng/ ml ±42), levels remained relatively stable between 60–180 min (201 ± 51 ng/ ml) (Fig 1D). Liver samples were taken at exact times corresponding to the third pulse peak (140 min) and nadir (180 min) of the PULS. CONS and vehicle control infusion (VEH) samples were taken at the same time points. Circulating CORT levels were confirmed for all rats taken for liver chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP) processing (Fig 1E).
Genome-wide GR binding is glucocorticoid pattern dependent
Liver samples were assessed for GR binding across the genome using ChIP assay followed by next generation sequencing (ChIP-Seq). In total, 3,098 sites of significantly increased GR intensity (relative to VEH) were identified across all groups, indicating sites of binding. Within these sites, striking CORT pattern-dependent and time-dependent changes were observed (Fig 2A–2F). Differences in tag density were evident at a subset of sites when comparing 140 min pulsatile corticosterone infusion (PEAK_140), 140 min constant corticosterone infusion (CONS_140) and 180 min constant corticosterone infusion (CONS_180), but all three groups exhibited an overall increase in tag density enrichment relative to both 180 min pulsatile corticosterone infusion (NADIR_180) and VEH.
Hierarchical clustering (Fig 2G) revealed the global extent of transient GR binding in liver during PULS. Of the total 3,098 identified binding sites, 2,658 were enriched (relative to VEH) at the PEAK_140 time point, whereas none were significantly detected at NADIR_180 (Fig 2H), indicating robust and transient GR binding synchronised to the CORT pulse peak. At CONS_140, approximately half the number (1,273 sites) were enriched (relative to VEH) compared to the matched PULS time point, however, in stark contrast to the complete lack of enriched sites at NADIR_180 to VEH, 1,953 binding sites were detected at CONS_180 (Fig 2G and 2H). Despite the increase in number of enriched sites detected at 180 min compared to 140 min of CONS, only 79 of these were found to be significantly differentially enriched in a direct comparison between time points (Figs 2J and S3C), indicating sustained enrichment over time at majority of sites during CONS.
As shown in the Venn diagram (Fig 2I), the largest proportion of GR binding sites (33.4%), were commonly enriched between PEAK_140, CONS_140 and CONS_180 time points. Almost a third of total sites were uniquely enriched at PEAK_140 (31.0%), whilst just a small proportion were unique to CONS (12.6%), and an even smaller proportion were exclusively associated with either CONS_140 (3.0%) or CONS_180 (7.6%).
Interestingly, a very small number of sites were found to have reduced enrichment of GR (relative to VEH), 50 at PEAK_140 (1.6% of all enriched sites), 10 at CONS_140 (0.3%) and 9 at CONS_180 (0.3%). Tag density distribution plots support these as regions of enrichment indicative of real binding events (S2F–S2J Fig), although a mechanism explaining how GR binding can be greater in adrenalectomised rather than in CORT treated rat liver is currently not well understood.
Together these data show how ultradian GC-dependent GR binding dynamics alter during constant CORT exposure.
Lack of evidence for a co-factor that determines differential GR binding dynamics
To identify determinants of liver-specific GR binding, as well as pattern-dependent co-factors, all significantly enriched sites from the GR ChIP-Seq datasets were analysed for over-represented de novo motif sequences. Of the top 6, the most confident match (p = e-458) was to the GRE motif (Fig 2K), followed by CEBPA, HNF4a, STAT5, FOXM1 and AR half-site consensus sequences. GRE distribution was most distinctly concentrated at the centre of the identified GR binding regions compared to other motifs (Fig 2L and 2M), further supporting identified enriched regions as direct GR binding sites as well as indicating specificity at the estimated location of GR to DNA interaction. Co-occurrence of HNF4α or STAT5 motifs with GREs was detected in over 50% of GRE-containing regions, while co-occurrence of CEBPA with GREs was detected in over 35% of GRE-containing regions (S4A Fig). As CEBPA has been demonstrated to maintain chromatin accessibility for GR binding in liver [29], together with other transcription factors including HNF4α, our findings most likely reflect these cell type-specific determinants of GR binding in liver rather than their involvement in determining differential responses to patterned GC exposure. The over-representation of STAT5 motifs within GRE-containing regions also likely reflects the known interactions of these two transcription factors in regulating a large number of functional groups of genes in liver [30]. Further interrogation of sequences underlying pattern-dependent GR binding sites was performed to determine whether specific motifs were enriched at sites exclusively induced by either PULS or CONS. Motifs underlying GR binding sites, however, were evenly represented across infusion pattern and times, indicating that differential GR binding patterns are highly unlikely to be determined by associated trans-acting factors (S4B and S4C Fig).
RNA polymerase II enrichment in target genes is regulated in a pattern-dependent manner
To investigate if the observed changes in CORT pattern-dependent GR binding modulates transcriptional activity, liver chromatin samples were immunoprecipitated using an antibody specific for a phosphorylated serine 2 residue on the carboxy terminal domain of RNAPol2 (pSer2 Pol2). As the pSer2 Pol2 is associated with the actively transcribing complex [31,32], intragenic occupancy data serves as a proxy for active transcription at the level of the chromatin.
pSer2 Pol2 occupancy exhibited dynamic regulation in a CORT time-dependent and pattern-dependent manner that was reflective of the GR binding patterns observed. PEAK_140 induced transcriptional changes in the largest proportion of total regulated genes (553 genes) whilst intragenic pSer2 Pol2 occupancy mostly returned to basal levels at NADIR_180 (for 449 genes) with the exception of 104 genes (Fig 3A, 3D and 3E). Interestingly, for both PEAK_140 and NADIR_180, there was decreased pSer2 Pol2 occupancy compared to VEH in approx. 3 out of 4 cases (Fig 3A and 3D) indicating an overall inhibitory transcriptional effect by PULS, although this was far more pronounced at PEAK_140 due to the transient nature of the vast majority of the changes. During CONS, differential pSer2 Pol2 enrichment relative to VEH was detected at both CONS_140 (254 genes) and CONS_180 (278 genes) (Fig 3A). More genes were up- rather than down-regulated at 140 min (196 and 58 genes respectively), whilst there was a more similar distribution at 180 min (138 and 140 genes respectively) (Fig 3D).
Consistent with observed GR binding dynamics, the most robust effect on transcriptional regulation was detected at PEAK_140, in a highly transient profile with a return to basal levels by NADIR_180 in most cases. In contrast, more moderate changes were detected with CONS, with lower fold change and fewer genes affected and sustained across both time points (Figs 3A, S3D, S3E and S3F).
Comparative mRNA expression analysis
To assess the impact of the observed highly dynamic patterns of pSer2 Pol2 occupancy to the liver transcriptome, we performed RNA-Seq expression analysis on liver samples collected at 180 min PULS and CONS. The analysis revealed differential mRNA expression (relative to VEH) for 282 of the genes identified as differentially occupied by pSer2 Pol2 (39.6% of ChIP targets) (Figs 3B, 3D and S5). Whilst the direction of change in pSer2 Pol2 occupancy and RNA expression was found to be largely similar across data sets (Figs 3B, 3D and S5), there was an interesting exception; the pronounced transient decrease in pSer2 Pol2 occupancy observed at PEAK_140 did not result in significantly reduced mRNA expression levels at 180 min, for the majority of cases. Transient reduction was observed in 406 of 453 pSer2 Pol2 differentially occupied genes at PEAK_140 and at 180 min, whilst just 41 of the 144 genes expressions were reduced in the RNA. Interestingly, the transient increased pSer2 Pol2 occupancy of 147 genes at PEAK_140 was followed by increased mRNA expression for 103 genes at 180 min (Figs 3C and S5). Whilst in stark contrast, CONS decreases in pSer2 Pol2 occupancy between 140–180 min were faithfully accompanied by a significant down-regulation of mRNA at 180mins (146 genes), as was an approx. equal number of up-regulated genes (121 genes) compared to VEH (Figs 3C and S5). Globally, 1,105 mRNA transcripts were differentially expressed by CORT infusion, CONS differentially regulated 990 compared to 419 by PULS, representing 89.6% and 37.9% of all transcripts respectively (S6A Fig). Additionally, 679 of these transcripts were differentially expressed by CONS only and no other infused condition, whilst PULS induced 109 (S6B Fig). The similarity between CONS regulation of total RNA-Seq data and the pSer2 Pol2 cohort is intriguing, as globally PULS was overly activatory (277 up- as opposed to 142 down-regulated) whilst CONS was equally activatory and inhibitory (497 up- to 493 down-regulated) of mRNA at 180 min despite the greater number of differentially expressed mRNA. Together, these data indicate transient increases, as opposed to decreases, in pSer2 Pol2 occupancy at PEAK_140 are more reflective of increased levels of mRNA at 180 min for PULS whilst CONS is a stronger transcriptional modulator for both up- and down-regulation.
The pSer2 Pol2 ChIP-seq data analysis may provide some insight, as despite PEAK_140 inducing the greater change in pSer2 Pol2 regulation, the changes are short-lived and highly transient, while the lower but sustained pSer2 Pol2 regulation by CONS has greater effects on mRNA expression levels, highlighting the complexity of regulation in this highly dynamic system.
RNAPol2 dynamics reveal evidence for a promoter-proximal pausing model as well as a relationship between increased or decreased occupancy predicated by the proximity of an enriched GR binding site
Tag density distribution from the TSS of sense strand coded regions > 10 kb, revealed distinct increased density between +35 b to +95 b from the TSS across all datasets irrespective of treatment or time point (Fig 3F). As the pSer2 Pol2 complex is associated with the actively transcribing complex throughout the coding region [31,32], this pattern of enrichment may represent stalled complexes, as proposed within the bimodal, promoter-pausing model of transcription [33,34].
Additionally, an interesting relationship was observed in our data, irrespective of the CORT infused condition (Fig 3G). When distance of the most proximal GR binding site to a CORT-regulated TSS was plotted against either increased or decreased pSer2 Pol2 occupied genes, the 25th percentile was closer (9.81 b (log2)) for increasingly compared to decreasingly occupied targets (14.29 b (log2)) in response to PEAK_140 (Fig 3G(i)). Similar relationships were observed throughout the percentiles as well as in response to either CONS time point (Fig 3G). It should be noted there were reduced differences in response to CONS_140 due to the overall increased transcriptional recruitment compared to other infused conditions (Fig 3G(ii)). This is consistent with similar mRNA data in A549 cells, however, mechanisms underpinning the observation are not yet understood [35].
Functional pathway analysis reveals evidence for differential regulation of key metabolic pathways
Pathway analysis was performed using pSer2 Pol2 significant fold changes as a proxy for transcriptional change and according to published data, significant predictions of activation (z-score ≥ 2) or inhibition (z-score ≤ -2) were calculated. Trends (z-score 1–2) of transient activation during pulsatile infusion (synchronised to PEAK_140) but sustained during constant infusion (across both CONS_140 and CONS_180 time points) were evident for pathways regulating inflammation of liver, concentration of glucose, quantity of glycogen and carbohydrate (Fig 4A). Interestingly, there was a juxtaposition between necrosis and cell death of hepatoma cell lines, with proliferation of liver cells which was further compounded by the CONS only activation of liver growth (Fig 4B). Taken together, these data indicate that glucose and carbohydrate metabolism, as well as hepatocyte cell turn over were more strongly associated with CONS exposure compared to the same dose of PULS. This is most strongly observed within the super-pathway of methionine degradation (Fig 4A), as it was significantly predicted to be activated at PEAK_140 (z-score 2.24), CONS_140 (z-score 2.45) and CONS_180 (z-score 2.45). This prolonged prediction of activation could induce greater degradation of methionine, compared to the transient activation in response to PULS.
Other trends of activation / inhibition were predicted for pathways regulating levels of serotonin, melatonin, monosaccharides, triacylglycerols, lipids and fatty acids (Fig 4C). In particular, significantly predicted inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis was reported at the NADIR_180 (z-score -2) with an accompanied strong trend at PEAK-140 (z-score -1.89), whereas no prediction was made for CONS_140 and a reduced trend at CONS_180 (Z-score -1), indicating the potential for reduced cholesterol levels in response to PULS. Pathways of dyslipidemia and hyperlipidemia were also enriched for CORT-regulated genes, corroborating the known relationship between GCs and these conditions.
Addition to these powerful and novel insights into dynamic CORT regulated genomic transcriptional activity, we further investigated whether changes to the mRNA transcriptome were also detectable in related metabolic pathways. Gene ontology analysis of the 1,126 differentially expressed mRNA identified 59 pathways enriched by PULS regulated targets, whilst CONS regulated targets were enriched in a greatly increased total of 179 pathways (Fig 4D). CONS was observed to have a greater transcriptional effect as 38 out of the 59 pathways enriched for PULS regulated targets were also identified in response to CONS with a greater number of CONS regulated genes associated for each pathway (Fig 4E).
There was a good deal of cross-over between pSer2 Pol2 ChIP and RNA pathway analysis, despite the acute timeframe. Within RNA gene ontology results, pathways of gluconeogenesis, fat cell differentiation and sequestering of triglycerides were enriched for PULS regulated genes whilst triglyceride biosynthesis, liver development and metabolism of glucose, cholesterol, lipid and fatty acids were for CONS (Fig 4F). Genes within insulin, glucagon, triglyceride metabolism and circadian rhythm pathways were enriched for both CORT pattern regulated genes, with CONS regulating a greater number within each pathway.
Together, these analyses demonstrate how functional pathways implicated in metabolic pathology could be significantly affected by patterned CORT exposure within a relatively acute 3 hr period.
Pathway analysis reveals key CORT pattern regulated genes
Based upon pathway analysis, several key genes were identified with robust CORT pattern-dependent pSer2 Pol2 changes in occupancy, as well as proximal GR binding within 50 Kb of their TSS. For example, pSer2 Pol2 occupancy of the key gluconeogenic target serine dehydrogenase (Sds) was transiently increased by PULS but sustained by CONS, as was GR enrichment at a site ~-5 kb from the TSS (Fig 4H) which was represented by an increased induction of mRNA expression by CONS compared to PULS (4.2- and 2.8-fold respectively). Opposingly, pSer2 Pol2 occupancy of glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit (G6pc) was transiently decreased (S7B Fig), whilst no change to VEH was detected at solute carrier family 37 member 4 (Slc37a4) (S7A Fig). In response to CONS, no change was found for G6pc, but Slc37a4 was decreased at both CONS_140 and CONS_180 to VEH. Similar CORT pattern-regulated binding to Sds was detected -6 kb and -12 kb from the G6pc and at the TSS for Slc37a4. These targets are important factors within gluconeogenesis and present key evidence glucose production and efflux could be altered by patterned CORT exposure.
CONS was indicated to have similar effects at key lipogenic targets, potentially increasing lipogenesis as well as triglyceride formation. For example, LPIN1 oxidises fatty acids for triglyceride formation and induces adipocyte differentiation [36]. Changes in pSer2 Pol2 indicated the transient increased transcription at PEAK_140, was sustained across time points by CONS (Fig 4G), and this is consequently associated with a greater fold-change in mRNA to VEH by CONS (3.5- and 4.4-fold increases respectively). Additionally, transient repression of apolipoprotein B (ApoB) which is integral to correct very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) assembly, was sustained by CONS (S7C Fig). Together, CONS regulation of these targets could have distinct implication for metabolite deposition within the liver.
Transient increases / decreases in pSer2 Pol2 in response to PULS which are prolonged by CONS were also observed in key cell death and proliferative factors, such as Myc, Igfbp1 and Igf1 (S8A, S8B and S8C Fig). Most notably, dynamic increased transcription of Igfbp1 resulted in significant increased mRNA production in response to CONS only (3.1-fold); further evidence of prolonged changes in active transcription impacting overall levels of mRNA. Together these key targets indicate transient regulation of glucose and lipogenic processes, which exhibit the potential to be dysregulated during aberrant CORT exposure. Importantly, our results have also identified hepatocyte factors regulating turnover rates within the liver to be highly sensitive to the pattern of GC exposure.
Discussion
For the first time we have been able to demonstrate, in vivo, that hourly PULS not only mimics physiological endogenous ultradian CORT fluctuations within the circulation of the rat but also robustly induces GR binding at over 2,500 binding sites synchronised to the peak of a CORT pulse (PEAK_140), whilst no significantly detectable binding events were found at NADIR_180. We also present evidence that resultant transcriptional activity is similarly dynamic, as the occupancy of over 500 genes by pSer2 Pol2 were similarly regulated and synchronised to the CORT pulse peak. These data demonstrate that GC-responsive mechanisms are sensitive to ultradian oscillations in vivo and reveal new evidence for differential transcriptional outcomes during pulsatile versus constant CORT replacement. For liver transcriptome regulation, pulsatile CORT induced GR binding and pSer2 Pol2 occupancy of GC-responsive genes was highly transient, whist in contrast constant CORT exposure induced prolonged GR binding and dysregulated RNAPol2 dynamic occupancy. This effect led to greater change in key mRNA targets in response to constant CORT, with potentially adverse impacts on key functional metabolic pathways in the liver. It was also striking that despite the greater changes to pSer2 Pol2 occupancy at PEAK_140, CONS was a greater regulator of mRNA expression. Additionally, despite a greater repressive action at PEAK_140 on pSer2 Pol2 occupancy, it was the increased occupancy that was realised within transcriptomic changes in mRNA whilst CONS was equally effective for increased and repressed action. We therefore conclude that not only is the transcriptome sensitive to oscillating levels of endogenous glucocorticoids, but that the highly transient nature of PULS is not effective at repressing mRNA expression, which could play a potentially very important role for physiologically appropriate transcriptional regulation. Our pathway analysis highlighted several metabolic pathways enriched for CORT responsive targets regulating inflammation, glucose, lipid, carbohydrate, cholesterol regulation as well as liver growth and death pathways. Whilst these pathways are well known to be regulated by GCs [12,37], this is the first evidence for distinct and opposing transcriptional effects induced by different patterns of GC exposure. Notably, pulsatile CORT was significantly predicted to repress cholesterol biosynthesis at 180 min with a trend at 140 min, whilst constant CORT only predicted a reduced trend of repression at 180 min; a potential risk factor associated with hypertension, obesity, liver fibrosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [38–40]. Similarly, the impact of constant CORT exposure on prolonged activation of the methionine degradation pathway may be to increase the risk of fatty liver development; a condition associated with increased methionine metabolites within the liver [41,42]. Furthermore, dysregulation of ultradian CORT responsive genes could have serious adverse consequences for glucose, triglyceride and lipid metabolism, leading to increased risk of developing insulin resistance, type II diabetes and fatty liver [12,37,43,44], whilst dysregulating growth and apoptotic regulating genes as observed in with NASH and liver fibrotic phenotypes [45–47].
We have also identified CORT-regulated targets and associated GR binding sites which may have key roles in the development of metabolic syndrome phenotypes in gluconeogenesis, de novo lipogenesis, substrate production for triglyceride synthesis as well as lipoprotein function. For example, Sds deaminates serine into the metabolic substrate pyruvate [48], whilst G6pc and its associated carrier protein Slc37a4 convert glucose-6-phosphate into glucose in a rate limiting step of gluconeogenesis [49]. Despite changes in mRNA only detected for Sds, if these changes in genomic transcriptional activity were reflected in the transcriptome over a prolonged period, the result could be increased glucose production and efflux from hepatocytes. Additionally, ApoB is required for VLDL synthesis and function, facilitating lipid accumulation within the lipoprotein as well as endocytosis by intermediate density lipoproteins and lowering VLDL levels within the circulation [50,51]. As VLDL synthesis and function are integral to the livers ability to transport triglyceride, lipids and other metabolites, net loss of ApoB transcription over time in response to CONS could be fundamental, as loss of this protein could increase deposition and storage within the liver. Known risk factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatosis [52–55]. Therefore, any dysregulation of synthesis over a prolonged period could have adverse effects.
Furthermore, dysregulating GR dynamics may also impact related endocrine-signalling systems. For example, growth hormone (GH) is secreted into the circulatory system in an inversed circadian fashion to CORT, peaking just after the onset of sleep [56,57]. The downstream targets of GH include stat5, stat3 and NFκB, which can act as transcriptional-co-factors with GR in well-established transrepressive mechanisms [58–60]. Therefore, dysregulation of GR dynamic activity could have serious implications for GH regulated pathways, particularly when one considers that night-shift workers present with unpredictable GH surges during their wake periods [57]. Increased bioavailability of active GR—also dysregulated by night-shift patterns—may then co-operatively increase the risk of metabolic syndrome associated clinical manifestations.
The importance of trying to reinstate a circadian rhythm in patients on GC replacement therapy is well recognised [61]. Surprisingly however, despite clinicians’ best attempts to provide an ‘optimal’ replacement regime, many patients suffer from a range of metabolic and cognitive side effects [19,62]. The prevalence of side effects becomes worse with increasing dose, especially when using long-acting sGCs. A recent meta-analysis concluded prescription of dexamethasone and prednisolone were significant risk factors for development of insulin resistance within individuals with no underlying pathology [44] and corticosteroid treatment was shown to increase the risk of developing type II diabetes in a cohort of patients that did not present underlying risk factors [18]. Our data provide an ultradian chronobiological mechanism whereby phasic GR recruitment and dissociation from the DNA is needed to optimally regulate metabolic homeostatic pathways in the liver and a mechanism through which non-oscillatory activation of glucocorticoid receptors could increase risk of metabolic dysfunction.
Dysregulation of ultradian oscillations, which results in a glucocorticoid profile lacking the endogenous nadir phase, can increase the transcription of specific genes associated with deposition of triglyceride, cholesterol and carbohydrates within the liver. Coupled with reduced ApoB expression and correct VLDL synthesis, over a prolonged period the loss of ultradian oscillations could increase the risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver and steatosis phenotypes.
Previous strategies to reduce the side effect profiles of GCs have not considered the importance of the pattern of replacement or the difference in binding kinetics for different GC analogues. Since GC hormones are used in such a wide range of diseases and abnormalities of endogenous GC secretion have been implicated in many stress related and psychiatric conditions, we hope that our findings will contribute to a better appreciation of pulse pattern and lead to improvements in future therapeutics.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All animal procedures were carried out in accordance with the UK Home Office animal welfare regulations and approved by written consent from the Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (University of Bristol).
Surgery and husbandry
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g) (Harlan, Bicester, UK) were individually caged in soundproof rooms under standard conditions with standard chow and water available ad libitum. All CORT infusions were conducted in rats under 14:10 light/dark cycle (lights on at Zt 0 hr) whilst automated blood sampling experiments were under 12:12 light/dark cycle.
Rats were anaesthetised with a combination of Isoflurane (100% w/w liquid vapour (Merial, UK)) and medical air during bilateral adrenalectomy, jugular vein or/ and carotid artery cannulation. The cannula (Smith Medicals, UK) was exteriorised via craniotomy or a vascular access button and attached to a spring and swivel system (S9 Fig). Post-operative analgesic 1 mg of Carprofen (Rimadyl, Pfizer, UK), 25 μg dexamethasone (Sigma, UK) and 2.5 ml of glucose (5%)/ saline (0.9%) were administered subcutaneously. For 5 days post-surgical recovery, 0.9% saline drinking water was supplemented with 0.15 μg/L of corticosterone (Sigma, UK) until 16 hours prior to infusion, whereupon 0.9% saline drinking water was provided ad libitum to ensure complete CORT washout from circulation. Implanted cannula was ‘flushed’ daily via withdrawal of blood and replaced with fresh heparinised saline (1:100) to maintain patency.
Circulating total blood serum CORT data
Total corticosterone blood serum samples were taken via an in-house automated blood sampler (S9 Fig). 40 μl blood samples were collected every 10 min in 160 μl Heparin: Saline solution (1:100). Plasma was separated from whole blood by centrifugation at 4000 rpm, 4°C and diluted 1 in 50 with citrate buffer, processed in triplicate and incubated overnight in 50 μl of 125I corticosterone tracer (Oxford BioInnovation DSL Ltd, Oxford, UK) with 50 μl of rabbit anti-rat corticosterone antibody (kindly donated by G. Makara, Hungary). Free/ bound separation was performed using charcoal dextran precipitation and centrifuged pellets 125I corticosterone levels recorded using a gamma counter (Wizard-2470, Perkin Elmer, MA). Concentrations of corticosterone in each plasma sample were interpolated from a standard curve and intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation have been established as 16.65% and 13.30%, respectively. Maximal corticosterone levels were identified by area under the curve analysis.
Infusion profiles
To ensure complete clearance of any extra-adrenal endogenously produced corticosterone, all experiments were completed between Zt 13–16. In vivo ‘mock’ ultradian pulses were produced by a programmable pump (PHD Ultra Syringe Pump, Harvard Apparatus, USA) infusing CORT solution (solubilised 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HBC) complex carrier (Sigma, UK) in (1:100) heparinised, 0.9% saline solution) through the jugular vein at a dose of 3.84 μM. Each pulsatile infusion period began with a 20 min infusion at a rate of 1 ml per hour followed by cessation for 40 min and repeated hourly for 3 hrs. A sustained CORT-HBC saline solution was infused at a reduced rate of 0.33 ml per hour. To ensure all infusion lines and cannula were free of any air gaps that may have appeared between setup and infusion, the constant corticosterone infusion initial rate was increased to 1 ml per hour for 10 min before returning to 0.33 ml per hour. Area under the curve analysis indicated no difference in CORT dose delivered across the 3 hrs between the PULS (3,9087 ng/ ml X min ± 1,025 S.E.M.) and CONS (38,969 ng/ ml X min ± 1,007 S.E.M.). HBC dissolved in 0.9% saline solution and delivered in a pulsatile pattern was used as vehicle control infusion. Euthanasia time points corresponded to the pulsatile pattern, third corticosterone pulse peak and nadir at 140 min and 180 min respectively for all infusion patterns. Trunk blood samples were collected for each rat with 40 μl of 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Tissue collection
Liver was dissected and 0.4 g fixed in 1% (v/v) formaldehyde (Sigma, UK), phosphate buffered saline (1.37 M NaCl, 2.68 mM KCl, 10.14 mM Na2HPO4, pH 7.4) solution for 10 min at room temperature. Formaldehyde cross-linking was quenched with addition of glycine (final conc. 125 mM) for 5 min and washed three times in ice cold phosphate buffered saline supplemented with 2 mM NaF, 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate and 1X cOmplete protease inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics). Fixed liver was stored at -80°C in 0.2 g samples in 500 μl of S1 Buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM (EDTA), pH 8) supplemented with 0.5 mM Dithiothreitol and 2 mM NaF, 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate and 1X cOmplete protease inhibitor.
Chromatin fragmentation
Samples were thawed slowly on ice and adjusted to a final volume of 1 ml/ sample with supplemented S1 buffer and Dounce homogenised. Lysate was centrifuged at 4000 rpm (4°C) and lysed in supplemented (2mM NaF and 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate and 1X cOmplete protease inhibitor) sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) lysis buffer (2% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.1)). Chromatin was sonicated using a Branson Sonifier 450 (Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA) to 300–500 bp fragments with multiple 10-sec bursts at 10% output and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C to remove cellular debris from the chromatin suspension. Sheared chromatin was stored at -80°C.
ChIP assay
ChIP buffers were prepared in house, as described in the EZ ChIP kit protocol (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY, USA) with some modifications for use with animal tissue (as described where relevant). Sheared chromatin was removed from -80°C storage and thawed slowly on ice, diluted to 50 μg in 100 μl of SDS lysis buffer and 0.9 ml with supplemented (2mM NaF, 0.2 mM NaVan and 1X cOmplete protease inhibitor) ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.1, 167 mM NaCl). Inputs were immunoprecipitated against either a GR antibody cocktail (2 μg of PA1-510A, 4 μl of PA1511A (Thermo Fisher, USA) and 4 μg of M-20X sc-1004X (Santa Cruz, USA)) or the serine 2 phosphorylated RNA polymerase II complex (2 μl ab5095 (Abcam, UK)). Rabbit IgG antibodies were used as negative control (2 μg of sc-2027 (Santa Cruz, USA)). Inputs were incubated overnight at 4°C and incubated with protein A Dynabeads for 4 hrs (Sigma-Aldrich, UK). To reduce non-specific binding, the DNA-Antibody-Dynabead slurries were sequentially washed with 150 mM salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.1), 500 mM salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.1), LiCl buffer (0.25 M LiCl, 1% IGEPAL-CA630, 1% deoxycholic acid sodium salt, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.1) and twice in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA) (pH 8.0). Complexes were eluted from the Dynabeads in 1% SDS 100 mM and 0.1M NaHCO3. NaCl was added (300 mM final concentration) and crosslinks reversed overnight at 65°C. RNA was removed using RNase treatment (Roche Diagnostics) at 65°C and protein was digested using proteinase K (Ambion, Huntington, UK) after adjusting each solution with EDTA (1 mM final) and Tris-HCl (4 mM final) at 45°C. DNA was extracted using 25:24:1 phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (Sigma, UK) followed by 24:1 chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (Sigma, UK). DNA in the aqueous phase was precipitated overnight at -20°C in 2.5 VOL 100% ethanol and 20 μg glycogen (Sigma-Aldrich, UK). DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm, 4°C and washed in 70% Ethanol (13,000 rpm, 4°C), air dried and suspended in 40 μl nuclease free water (Ambion, Huntington, UK).
ChIP-Seq quality control and alignment
For each ChIP-seq replicate/condition/timepoint, liver samples from 6 rats were collected (72 rats in total). From each replicate/condition/timepoint, 10 x 100ug chromatin aliquots were prepared and immunoprecipitated with antibodies to either GR or pSer2 Pol2 before pooled, concentrated using a UniVapo Vacuum concentrator (Transcriptomics facility, UOB) to approx. 35 μl and sequenced. Note: Two pooled ChIP samples (N = 10 in each) were sequenced to allow for concordant peak calling analysis as previously described [63]. Library preparation (TrueSeq SBS v3-HS kit (illumina, US)) and Next-Gen sequencing using the Illumnina HiSeq2000 platform (Illumina, USA) of the samples was processed at the Advanced Technology Research Facility (ATRF), National Cancer Institute (NCI-Frederick, MD, USA).
Adapters were removed, filtered for a base quality of 33 and sequence lengths of 50 b were isolated using Trimmomatic-0.36 [64]. Trimmed FASTQ files were aligned to the rat genome (UCSC rn6 assembly) using bowtie2 [65] and duplicate tags removed using SAMtools 1.3.1 [66]. Subsequent analysis was performed using HOMER v4.9 [67].
Counts were normalised to 10 million tags (makeTagDirectory) to allow for cross sample comparisons and visualised using the UCSC genome browser [68] (http://genome.ucsc.edu/).
Identification of GR ChIP-Seq enriched regions
Enrichment of GR tags to 1% input control, were identified (findPeaks) using relaxed settings (-F1 -L1 -P.1 -LP.01 -poisson .1 -style factor). Replicate concordance was assessed using an irreproducible discovery rate (IDR v2.0.3) set to 0.01. Overlapping enrichments between replicates were merged using mergePeaks (HOMER v4.9.1) and filtered according to the IDR estimated confidence threshold. Overlapping confident enrichment regions were merged again (mergePeaks) to create a single list of enriched GR locations across conditions. Visualisation of tag densities were done using EASeq v1.101 [69] and gplots (heatmap.2).
Analysis of differential enrichments
Analyses of pSer2 Pol2 ChIP-Seq enrichment was restricted to transcript coding regions larger than twice the fragment length (> 320b) and limited to 10 Kb from the TSS (Ensemble release Rnor_6.0.92). Raw input ChIP-Seq tag counts were subtracted from both GR and pSer2 Pol enrichment regions (annotatePeaks.pl–HOMER v4.9.1).
Differential GR and pSer2 Pol2 enrichment fold changes were assessed to VEH control and between corticosterone infusion time points using getDiffExpression.pl (HOMER v4.9.1) and DESeq2 [70]. GR tags were normalised to the count within de novo binding regions whilst pSer2 Pol2 tags were normalised to total sequenced tags across replicates. Differential GR and pSer2 Pol2 enrichments were considered significantly different if fold change > 1.5-fold and FDR < 0.05. All other results were given the value 0. Variants of the same gene were filtered for the greatest fold change across all conditions and time points. Distances between TSSs and GR binding regions were assessed using annotatePeaks.pl.
Motif analysis
223 b in either direction from the centre of identified GR enrichment regions (total equal to twice the average fragment length) were analysed for both de novo and known motifs using findMotifsGenome.pl (HOMER v4.9.1). Repeat sequences were masked and optimised for motifs 8, 10 and 12 b long. Calculations of motifs per base pair per peaks were calculated using de novo motif matrices within HOMER v4.9.1 and histograms indicate location of the motif relative to the GR binding site centre and plotted using GraphPad Prism v6.07 for Windows (La Jolla California, USA, www.graphpad.com).
RNA preparation and sequencing
Frozen liver sections were homogenised (Polytron, PT-2100, Kinematica, CH) in TRIzol (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). The aqueous phase was separated via chloroform extraction (Sigma-Aldritch, UK) and centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 4°C), total RNA extracted, and DNA digested (miRNAeasy mini, Qiagen, US). Libraries were constructed from 1 μg total RNA (TrueSeq Stranded Total RNA kit, Illumina, USA) and filtered for a RIN score > 8 and < 10 (Agilent Tape Station, Bioanalyzer, UK) for sequencing (HiSeq 2500, Illumina UK). All samples were handled according to manufacturer protocols. Adapters removed, sequences trimmed (bbduk.sh) and FASTQ files aligned to the rat genome (UCSC rn6 assembly).
RNA-Seq analysis
Exonic co-ordinates according to the Ensemble, Rnor_6.0.92 release were assessed (featureCounts) [71], filtered > 10 reads and differential expression of transcripts with a fold change > 1.5 and FDR < 0.05 assessed via DESeq2 [70]. Visualisation of results were plotted using gplots (heatmap.2).
pSer2 Pol2 pathway analysis
pSer2 Pol2 ChIP-Seq DESeq2 data were analysed via Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (Qiagen Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/igenuity-pathway-analysis). Enrichment of pathways were identified from genes with fold changes ≥ 1.5-fold and adjusted p-value < 0.05 to VEH based on previously published liver tissue and HepG3, hepatoma, hepatocyte cell lines as well as mice, rat and human data. Positive and negative z-scores represent either predicted activation (≥ 2) or inhibition (≤ -2) respectively of pathways are based upon the degree of fold change and significance of the individual genes change in expression, the numbers of genes that act as an upstream regulator to induce and / or inhibit a specific pathway, adjusted for the number of studies that report this effect, and according to a binomial distribution. As explained by the following equation, . Where the distribution of x = ∑ixi = N++N−, the variance of and the adjustment of published findings is .
RNA pathway analysis
ENSEMBL [72] was used to retrieve genome annotations using biomaRt (v2.44.4) [73,74], org.Rn.eg.db (v3.11.4), AnnotationDbi (v1.50.3) packages in R. Scaled Venn diagrams were generated using VennDiagram (v1.6.20) package in R [75]. Gene-ontology [76,77] analysis was performed using ClusterProfiler (v3.16.1) package in R [78,79]. Over-representation analysis was applied for genes passing adjusted p-value < 0.05 and log2 fold-change > 0.585. All expressed genes were used as the background in the over-representation analysis and as the input gene list in the gene-set enrichment analysis [80]. Benjamini-Hochberg correction (adjusted p-value < 0.05) was used for multiple comparison correction in the pathway analysis. Pathway analysis results were visualised using custom scripts written in R [81].
Statistical information
Regular two-way ANOVA was used to test for significant pattern, time-dependent and interactions followed by Bonferroni post-hoc testing (p < 0.05). All data is expressed as mean ± s.e.m. where appropriate.
Supporting information
Data Availability
Data is available at GEO with accession number GSE171647 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE171647).
Funding Statement
This research was funded in part, by the Wellcome Trust 089647/Z/09/Z awarded to B.L.C-C & S.L.L. and the United kingdom research Council grant MR/R010919/1 supporting B.L.C-C & B.P.F.. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/K008250/1) grant awarded to Dr. Colin Campbell and D.M. and the Needham Cooper Trust PhD scholarship awarded to B.P.F.. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Lightman SL, Conway-Campbell BL. The crucial role of pulsatile activity of the HPA axis for continuous dynamic equilibration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11: 710–718. doi: 10.1038/nrn2914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Waite EJ, McKenna M, Kershaw Y, Walker JJ, Cho K, Piggins HD, et al. Ultradian corticosterone secretion is maintained in the absence of circadian cues. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;36: 3142–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08213.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Windle RJ, Wood SA, Lightman SL, Ingram CD. The pulsatile characteristics of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal activity in female Lewis and Fischer 344 rats and its relationship to differential stress responses. Endocrinology. 1998;139: 4044–4052. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.10.6238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Follenius M, Simon C, Brandenberger G, Lenzi P. Ultradian plasma corticotropin and cortisol rhythms: time-series analyses. J Endocrinol Invest. 1987;10: 261–266. doi: 10.1007/BF03348128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Henley DE, Russell GM, Douthwaite JA, Wood SA, Buchanan F, Gibson R, et al. Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Activation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94: 4234–4242. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Walker JJ, Terry JR, Lightman SL. Origin of ultradian pulsatility in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010;277: 1627–1633. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lightman SL, Wiles CC, Atkinson HC, Henley DE, Russell GM, Leendertz JA, et al. The significance of glucocorticoid pulsatility. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2008. pp. 255–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Droste SK, De Groote L, Atkinson HC, Lightman SL, Reul JMHM, Linthorst ACE. Corticosterone levels in the brain show a distinct ultradian rhythm but a delayed response to forced swim stress. Endocrinology. 2008;149: 3244–3253. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qian X, Droste SK, Lightman SL, Reul JMHM, Linthorst ACE. Circadian and ultradian rhythms of free glucocorticoid hormone are highly synchronized between the blood, the subcutaneous tissue, and the brain. Endocrinology. 2012;153: 4346–53. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhake RC, Kluckner V, Stassen H, Russell GM, Leendertz J, Stevens K, et al. Continuous Free Cortisol Profiles—Circadian Rhythms in Healthy Men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104: 5935–5947. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bhake RC, Russell GM, Kershaw Y, Stevens K, Zaccardi F, Warburton VEC, et al. Continuous Free Cortisol Profiles in Healthy Men—Validation of Microdialysis Method. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019. [cited 9 Dec 2019]. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kuo T, McQueen A, Chen T-C, Wang J-C. Regulation of Glucose Homeostasis by Glucocorticoids. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;872: 99–126. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Feelders RA, Pulgar SJ, Kempel A, Pereira AM. The burden of Cushing’s disease: clinical and health-related quality of life aspects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;167: 311–326. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-1095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stavreva DA, Wiench M, John S, Conway-Campbell BL, McKenna MA, Pooley JR, et al. Ultradian hormone stimulation induces glucocorticoid receptor-mediated pulses of gene transcription. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11: 1093–1102. doi: 10.1038/ncb1922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nicolaides NC, Pavlaki AN, Maria Alexandra MA, Chrousos GP. Glucocorticoid Therapy and Adrenal Suppression. Endotext. MDText.com, Inc.; 2018. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25905379 25905379 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wolkowitz OM. Prospective controlled studies of the behavioral and biological effects of exogenous corticosteroids. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1994;19: 233–55. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7515507 doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(94)90064-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Varney NR, Alexander B, MacIndoe JH. Reversible steroid dementia in patients without steroid psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 1984;141: 369–372. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.3.369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Simmons LR, Molyneaux L, Yue DK, Chua EL. Steroid-Induced Diabetes: Is It Just Unmasking of Type 2 Diabetes? ISRN Endocrinol. 2012;2012: 1–5. doi: 10.5402/2012/910905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Filipsson H, Monson JP, Koltowska-Häggström M, Mattsson A, Johannsson G. The Impact of Glucocorticoid Replacement Regimens on Metabolic Outcome and Comorbidity in Hypopituitary Patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91: 3954–3961. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mebrahtu TF, Morgan AW, Keeley A, Baxter PD, Stewart PM, Pujades-Rodriguez M. Dose Dependency of Iatrogenic Glucocorticoid Excess and Adrenal Insufficiency and Mortality: A Cohort Study in England. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104: 3757–3767. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lim HW, Uhlenhaut NH, Rauch A, Weiner J, H??bner S, H??bner N, et al. Genomic redistribution of GR monomers and dimers mediates transcriptional response to exogenous glucocorticoid in vivo. Genome Res. 2015;25: 836–844. doi: 10.1101/gr.188581.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reiter F, Wienerroither S, Stark A. Combinatorial function of transcription factors and cofactors. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2017;43: 73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2016.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Conway-Campbell BL, McKenna MA, Wiles CC, Atkinson HC, de Kloet ER, Lightman SL. Proteasome-dependent down-regulation of activated nuclear hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors determines dynamic responses to corticosterone. Endocrinology. 2007;148: 5470–7. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reddy TE, Gertz J, Crawford GE, Garabedian MJ, Myers RM. The hypersensitive glucocorticoid response specifically regulates period 1 and expression of circadian genes. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32: 3756–67. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00062-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Conway-Campbell BL, Sarabdjitsingh R a., McKenna M a., Pooley JR, Kershaw YM, Meijer OC, et al. Glucocorticoid ultradian rhythmicity directs cyclical gene pulsing of the clock gene period 1 in rat hippocampus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2010;22: 1093–1100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2010.02051.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Conway-Campbell BL, George CL, Pooley JR, Knight DM, Norman MR, Hager GL, et al. The HSP90 molecular chaperone cycle regulates cyclical transcriptional dynamics of the glucocorticoid receptor and its coregulatory molecules CBP/p300 during ultradian ligand treatment. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25: 944–954. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.George CL, Birnie MT, Flynn BP, Kershaw YM, Lightman SL, Conway-Campbell BL. Ultradian glucocorticoid exposure directs gene-dependent and tissue-specific mRNA expression patterns in vivo. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;439: 46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.10.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stavreva DA, Coulon A, Baek S, Sung M-H, John S, Stixova L, et al. Dynamics of chromatin accessibility and long-range interactions in response to glucocorticoid pulsing. Genome Res. 2015;25: 845–857. doi: 10.1101/gr.184168.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grøntved L, John S, Baek S, Liu Y, Buckley JR, Vinson C, et al. C/EBP maintains chromatin accessibility in liver and facilitates glucocorticoid receptor recruitment to steroid response elements. EMBO J. 2013;32: 1568–1583. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Engblom D, Kornfeld J-W, Schwake L, Tronche F, Reimann A, Beug H, et al. Direct glucocorticoid receptor-Stat5 interaction in hepatocytes controls body size and maturation-related gene expression. 2007;21. doi: 10.1101/gad.426007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cho EJ, Kobor MS, Kim M, Greenblatt J, Buratowski S. Opposing effects of Ctk1 kinase and Fcp1 phosphatase at Ser 2 of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain. Genes Dev. 2001;15: 3319–29. doi: 10.1101/gad.935901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ahn SH, Kim M, Buratowski S. Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing. Mol Cell. 2004;13: 67–76. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00492-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Quinodoz M, Gobet C, Naef F, Gustafson KB. Characteristic bimodal profiles of RNA polymerase II at thousands of active mammalian promoters. Genome Biol. 2014;15: R85. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Muse GW, Gilchrist DA, Nechaev S, Shah R, Parker JS, Grissom SF, et al. RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome. Nat Genet. 2007;39: 1507–11. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Reddy TE, Pauli F, Sprouse RO. Genomic determination of the glucocorticoid response reveals unexpected mechanisms of gene regulation Genomic determination of the glucocorticoid response reveals unexpected mechanisms of gene regulation. Genome Res. 2009;19: 2163–2171. doi: 10.1101/gr.097022.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Finck BN, Gropler MC, Chen Z, Leone TC, Croce MA, Harris TE, et al. Lipin 1 is an inducible amplifier of the hepatic PGC-1α/PPARα regulatory pathway. Cell Metab. 2006;4: 199–210. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.de Guia R, Rose AJ, Herzig S. Glucocorticoid hormones and energy homeostasis. Horm moecular Biol Clin Investig. 2014;19: 117–128. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2014-0021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ichimura M, Kawase M, Masuzumi M, Sakaki M, Nagata Y, Tanaka K, et al. High-fat and high-cholesterol diet rapidly induces non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with advanced fibrosis in Sprague-Dawley rats. Hepatol Res. 2015;45: 458–469. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Van Rooyen DM, Larter CZ, Haigh WG, Yeh MM, Ioannou G, Kuver R, et al. Hepatic Free Cholesterol Accumulates in Obese, Diabetic Mice and Causes Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141: 1393–1403.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ioannou GN, Morrow OB, Connole ML, Lee SP. Association between dietary nutrient composition and the incidence of cirrhosis or liver cancer in the united states population. Hepatology. 2009;50: 175–184. doi: 10.1002/hep.22941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kharbanda K. Alcoholic Liver Disease and Methionine Metabolism. Semin Liver Dis. 2009;29: 155–165. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mato JM, Martínez-Chantar ML, Lu SC. Methionine Metabolism and Liver Disease. Annu Rev Nutr. 2008;28: 273–293. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.28.061807.155438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yaribeygi H, Farrokhi FR, Butler AE, Sahebkar A. Insulin resistance: Review of the underlying molecular mechanisms. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234: 8152–8161. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhou P-Z, Zhu Y-M, Zou G-H, Sun Y-X, Xiu X-L, Huang X, et al. Relationship Between Glucocorticoids and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Individuals. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22: 1887–94. doi: 10.12659/msm.895251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Feldstein AE, Canbay A, Angulo P, Taniai M, Burgart LJ, Lindor KD, et al. Hepatocyte apoptosis and fas expression are prominent features of human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2003;125: 437–43. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12891546 doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00907-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Luedde T, Kaplowitz N, Schwabe RF. Cell Death and Cell Death Responses in Liver Disease: Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance. Gastroenterology. 2014;147: 765. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Argo CK, Northup PG, Al-Osaimi AMS, Caldwell SH. Systematic review of risk factors for fibrosis progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2009;51: 371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sandoval I V, Sols A. Gluconeogenesis from Serine by the Serine-Dehydratase-Dependent Pathway in Rat Liver. Eur J Biochem. 1974. Available: https://febs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03448.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Van Schaftingen E, Gerin I. The glucose-6-phosphatase system. Biochem J. 2002. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1222414/pdf/11879177.pdfdoi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3620513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Powell LM, Wallis SC, Pease RJ, Edwards YH, Knott TJ, Scott J. A novel form of tissue-specific RNA processing produces apolipoprotein-B48 in intestine. Cell. 1987;50: 831–40. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3621347 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90510-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Atzel A, Wetterau JR. Mechanism of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein catalyzed lipid transport. Biochemistry. 1993;32: 10444–50. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8399189 doi: 10.1021/bi00090a021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wetterau JR, Aggerbeck LP, Bouma ME, Eisenberg C, Munck A, Hermier M, et al. Absence of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in individuals with abetalipoproteinemia. Science. 1992;258: 999–1001. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1439810 doi: 10.1126/science.1439810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jiang ZG, Robson SC, Yao Z. Lipoprotein metabolism in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Biomed Res. 2013;27: 1–13. doi: 10.7555/JBR.27.20120077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Linton ME, Fame R V, Young SG. Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia. J Lipid Res. 1993;34: 521–541. Available: www.jlr.org [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ota T, Gayet C, Ginsberg HN. Inhibition of apolipoprotein B100 secretion by lipid-induced hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress in rodents. J Clin Invest. 2008;118: 316–32. doi: 10.1172/JCI32752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sassin JF, Parker DC, Mace JW, Gotlin RW, Johnson LC, Rossman LG. Human growth hormone release: Relation to slow-wave sleep and sleep-waking cycles. Science (80-). 1969;165: 513–515. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3892.513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Brandenberger G, Weibel L. The 24-h growth hormone rhythm in men: Sleep and circadian influences questioned. J Sleep Res. 2004;13: 251–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00415.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stoecklin E, Wissler M, Moriggl R, Groner B. Specific DNA binding of Stat5, but not of glucocorticoid receptor, is required for their functional cooperation in the regulation of gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17: 6708–6716. doi: 10.1128/MCB.17.11.6708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Aittomäki S, Pesu M, Groner B, Jänne OA, Palvimo JJ, Silvennoinen O. Cooperation among Stat1, glucocorticoid receptor, and PU.1 in transcriptional activation of the high-affinity Fc gamma receptor I in monocytes. J Immunol. 2000;164: 5689–97. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.11.5689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hudson WH, Vera IMS de, Nwachukwu JC, Weikum ER, Herbst AG, Yang Q, et al. Cryptic glucocorticoid receptor-binding sites pervade genomic NF-κB response elements. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 1337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03780-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Charmandari E, Nicolaides NC, Chrousos GP. Adrenal insufficiency. Lancet (London, England). 2014;383: 2152–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61684-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Russell G, Lightman S. The human stress response. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. Nature Publishing Group; 2019. pp. 525–534. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0228-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pooley JR, Flynn BP, Grøntved L, Baek S, Guertin MJ, Kershaw YM, et al. Genome-wide identification of basic helix-loop helix and NF-1 motifs underlying GR binding sites in male rat hippocampus. Endocrinology. 2017;158: 1486–1501. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2114–20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25: 2078–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38: 576–89. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12: 996–1006. doi: 10.1101/gr.229102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lerdrup M, Johansen JV, Agrawal-Singh S, Hansen K. An interactive environment for agile analysis and visualization of ChIP-sequencing data. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23: 349–357. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. FeatureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yates AD, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Allen J, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, et al. Ensembl 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48: D682–D688. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Durinck S, Spellman PT, Birney E, Huber W. Mapping Identifiers for the Integration of Genomic Datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4: 1184–1191. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Durinck S, Moreau Y, Kasprzyk A, Davis S, De Moor B, Brazma A, et al. BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics. 2005;21: 3439–3440. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen H, Boutros PC. VennDiagram: A package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12: 35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gene Ontology Consortium T, Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology NIH Public Access Author Manuscript. Nat Genet. 2000;25: 25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics. NIH Public Access; 2000. pp. 25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. ClusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omi A J Integr Biol. 2012;16: 284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yu G, He QY. ReactomePA: An R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. Mol Biosyst. 2016;12: 477–479. doi: 10.1039/c5mb00663e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2020. [Google Scholar]