ABSTRACT
Point-of-care (POC) testing for Toxoplasma infection has the potential to revolutionize diagnosis and management of toxoplasmosis, especially in high-risk populations in areas with significant environmental contamination and poor health infrastructure precluding appropriate follow-up and preventing access to medical care. Toxoplasmosis is a significant public health challenge in Morocco, with a relatively heavy burden of infection and, to this point, minimal investment nationally to address this infection. Herein, we analyse the performance of a novel, low-cost rapid test using fingerstick-derived whole blood from 632 women (82 of whom were pregnant) from slums, educational centres, and from nomad groups across different geographical regions (i.e. oceanic, mountainous) of Morocco. The POC test was highly sensitive and specific from all settings. In the first group of 283 women, sera were tested by Platelia ELISA IgG and IgM along with fingerstick whole blood test. Then a matrix study with 349 women was performed in which fingerstick – POC test results and serum obtained by venipuncture contemporaneously were compared. These results show high POC test performance (Sensitivity: 96.4% [IC95 90.6–98.9%]; Specificity: 99.6% [IC95 97.3–99.9%]) and high prevalence of Toxoplasma infection among women living in rural and mountainous areas, and in urban areas with lower educational levels. The high performance of POC test confirms that it can reduce the need for venipuncture and clinical infrastructure in a low-resource setting. It can be used to efficiently perform seroprevalence determinations in large group settings across a range of demographics, and potentially expands healthcare access, thereby preventing human suffering.
KEYWORDS: Congenital toxoplasmosis, POC, screening, LDBIO test, diagnostics
Introduction
Congenital toxoplasmosis caused by the parasite Toxoplasma gondii is an emerging global health threat. The disease is a particular challenge in developing countries where health infrastructure is often lacking and access to medical care can be limited. Significant contamination of the environment with infectious oocysts in some of these countries adds to challenges [1]. Outbreaks of Toxoplasma infection have been recognized in many countries and caused mortality [2–5]. Contamination of a municipal reservoir water supplying Victoria, Canada, is one example of large-scale contamination of water with wild cat oocysts [6]. The cats, hosts of these parasites, are capable of shedding hundreds of millions of oocysts in their faeces over 2 weeks during primary infection. In addition, Toxoplasma can also be contracted by eating undercooked meat contaminated with cysts. Congenital toxoplasmosis (CT) is of particular importance because vertical transmission, when acute infection occurs during pregnancy, represents a point of intervention to reduce incidence and disease severity in affected persons. The global annual incidence of congenital toxoplasmosis is estimated to be ∼190,100 cases per year [7]. Hydrocephalus can occur, and vision loss, a source of significant morbidity, can complicate untreated, congenitally infected infants [8]. Pregnant women with acute infection often do not present any symptoms and only serologic tests confirm the infection [9]. Implementing early diagnosis and rapid initiation of treatment are key strategies in the control of congenital toxoplasmosis in France, Austria, Colombia, Brazil and other countries [10]. Treatment also includes prevention through the administration of spiramycin, which concentrates in the placenta and blocks or delays transmission of the parasite to the foetus by ∼50% [8]. If an acute infection is confirmed in pregnant women using molecular diagnostic tools, pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and folinic acid are the mainstays of treatment. No commercially available medicine treats the latent bradyzoite life stage. Prenatal screening and treatment have been demonstrated to be cost-effective, including in Austria and France and estimated to be so in the US [11–13]. Early identification of women who seroconvert during pregnancy becomes especially challenging in areas with limitations in health infrastructure or less robust follow-up presents a challenge to adequate management of the threat presented by T. gondii for human health.
It was demonstrated that the POC kit for Toxoplasma infection could facilitate testing with high performance in the USA (McLeod et al. manuscript in preparation). Thus, it is an alternative to address this gap with previously demonstrated strong diagnostic performance with more than 400 tests performed in the USA with a broad patient and provider acceptance [14]. Morocco, a country with high seroprevalence (∼50%) and a tradition of screening for toxoplasmosis a few times in gestation, represents a new frontier in implementing this test [15–17]. Twenty-one infants out 48,890 (3.9–8 per 10,000 live birth) were confirmed to be born with CT in different Moroccan regional hospital centres in 2015 [17]. Seventy-one percent of these were diagnosed at Rabat hospitals [17]. The establishment of a rational approach to managing congenital toxoplasmosis, especially in the developing world, was the subject of a recent study that was performed in collaboration with the National Institute of Hygiene, Rabat [17]. This concluded with the establishment/implementation of an International Collaborative POC-Prenatal Screening Program in Morocco.
We reported earlier the diagnostic performance of a lateral flow immunochromatography-based Toxoplasma ICT IgG–IgM (LDBIO test) using serum from venipuncture, which was highly accurate in France and the United States [18,19]. Furthermore, the whole blood variant test was found to be highly sensitive and specific [14].
Herein, we performed a national prevalence study using this novel, low-cost rapid test that is equipment free and provides results within 20 min, using whole blood obtained via finger stick for 632 women from different geographical regions (ocean and mountains) of Morocco. This was accomplished efficiently on a large scale in a short time by providing an educational session, obtaining informed consent, and collecting answers to a questionnaire assessing risk factors and demographics, together in one large group setting/session, subsequently testing was performed with blood from venipuncture and fingerstick concurrently. We found that the test is reliable, correlating well with conventional testing. With this test, we found a high prevalence of Toxoplasma infection in rural areas and women with low educational levels. The specificity and the sensitivity of the test were very high in all sites when compared to conventional testing for IgG and IgM from Bio-Rad ELISA test. Matrix study comparison between the results of whole blood obtained by fingerstick and 15 μL of serum obtained from venipuncture showed high sensitivity: (96.4%) with 4 false negatives and 1 false positive. These results have implications for potentially reducing the need for venipuncture and mitigating the lack of healthcare infrastructure with technical sophistication at the site for processing samples, especially in geographical areas with barriers to access for populations with a high burden of infection.
Materials and methods
Study area
The study was performed in Casablanca, Rabat and Aït Hani (Tinghir). In Casablanca, data were collected from three locations: (1) Communal Hospital Center Al Waha, Sidi Moumen, (2) Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Technologies (ISPITS), and (3) Faculty of Sciences Aïn Chock, University Hassan II (FSAC).
Human subjects’ involvement and characteristics
The 632 participants recruited in these centres were female, ages 17–70 years old. Among them, 82 were pregnant women. The distribution of these participants in the three regions is as follows: Casablanca region: 36 underserved women patients from the poor neighbourhoods of Sidi Moumen, 188 female students from ISPITS and 103 female students from FSAC; Rabat region: 184 women presented to the diagnostic centre at the National Institute of Hygiene in Rabat; Aït Hani region: 121 nomad women living in the mountains near Tinghir. Demographics including age, socioeconomic status (as described by living area, professional activity, education level) and clinical/risk factor data (contamination mode, consumption of undercooked meat, raw vegetables, and unfiltered water, cat contact, soil contact, gestational history in case of pregnant women) were collected from participants during their visits to these centres. Two blood samples were collected from each participant, one via fingerstick and the other via venipuncture.
Matrix study
Participants provided whole blood via fingerstick. A lancet and capillary tube was used to collect ∼30 µL of blood (half a 60 µL capillarity tube, by visual estimate), which was placed on the sample collection pad of the LDBIO test kit, followed by 4 drops of buffer provided in the kit. Twenty minutes later, the results were interpreted independently by two independent observers and photographed for later comparison to the serological status of the subjects. In parallel, participants had blood obtained by venipuncture and serum obtained from this sample after centrifugation. 15 µL of serum were placed on a new LDBIO kit and the results were compared to the whole blood POC test result and the serum from the venipuncture sample.
Reference standard test
All sera were transported to the Toxoplasma Serology Laboratory at the National Institute of Hygiene (Health Ministry) for ELISA Platelia™ Toxo IgG: ref 72840 and Platelia™ Toxo IgM: ref 72841 assays (BIO-RAD, Marnes la Coquette, France). The ELISA test was used as a reference standard for comparison to LDBIO tests for each patient. Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of the LDBIO test were determined.
Reference Western blot test
In addition to ELISA Bio-Rad test, we used Western blot TOXO II as a reference test for comparing the efficacy of LDBIO test. Briefly, anonymized samples from the matrix study were also sent to LDBIO Diagnostics (Lyon, France), where Toxo II WB IgG test (LDBIO Diagnostics, Lyon France), recognized as equivalent to the reference gold standard tests IgG Dye test in France [20], was performed on all samples. The test was performed blindly in samples according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, 10 µl of sample was used and incubated with the test strip in different test buffers; dilution buffer (for 90 min), conjugate antibodies (for 60min), and substrate (for 60 min). The test was considered positive if at least 3 bands, among P30, P31, P33, P40, or P45, were visible in the strip, including P30. Band positioning and test validation were performed by comparison to positive control included in the kit.
Ethics
All participants provided written informed consent. The study was conducted with ethical standards for human experimentation established in the Declaration of Helsinki, with prior institutional review approval from National Institute of Hygiene and Moroccan Ministry of Health. The privacy and safety of the participants were ensured, and informed consent obtained from participants was stored and kept confidential at the National Institute of Hygiene. Biological samples were collected under the norms and standards established by the Moroccan Ministry of Health.
Statistical analysis
Sensitivity and specificity were obtained using PROC FREQ and approximate confidence intervals using Wilson’s method with correction of continuity were reported. All p-values reported were based on chi-square tests. Comparisons between sites were made using a chi-square test. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata software, version 13.
Results
Study design and samples subjects
The 632 participants in this study are from rural and urban areas of 3 diverse geographical sites of Morocco (Casablanca, Rabat and Ait Hani) (Figure 1).
Comparison of rapid test with conventional serologic testing
Sera from patients were processed and analysed for IgG and IgM using ELISA from Bio-Rad. Data are reported in Table 1 and Table 1S (Confidence intervals are within brackets).
Table 1.
Region | Location | Positive | Negative | Positivity rate | Sensitivity | Specificity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rabat | Rabat | 102 | 82 | 55% [47.9–62.7%] | 96% [89.7–98.7] | 100% [94.4–100] |
Tinghir | Aït Hani | 57 | 64 | 47% [38.0–56.4%] | 93% [82.2–97.7] | 98% [90.4–99.9] |
Casablanca | Al Waha | 16 | 20 | 44% [28.3–61.7] | 94% [67.7–99.7] | 100%[79.9–100] |
ISPTS | 33 | 155 | 18% [12.5–23.9] | 100% [87.0–100] | 100% [97.0–100] | |
FSAC | 18 | 85 | 17% [11.0–26.5] | 100% [78.1–100] | 100% [94.6–100] | |
Total | 226 | 406 | 36% [32.0–39.7] | 97% [93.5–98.6] | 100% [98.4–100] |
Risk factors on the epidemiology of toxoplasmosis among patients
We performed a questionnaire focusing on knowledge of toxoplasmosis in all study sites. We found that the majority of patients acknowledged the risk factors of toxoplasmosis through the contact of soil, unwashed fruits and vegetables, drinking water from the supply system, or wells (Figure 2). Additionally, the level of education is a risk factor for infection with T. gondii. There was a high prevalence of Toxoplasma infection among women living in rural and mountainous areas, and in urban areas with lower educational levels. Other risk factors included exposure to soil, well water and not washing fruits and vegetables prior to consuming them (Figure 2).
Matrix study
We performed a matrix study by comparing POC test from 30 µL of whole blood fingerstick compared to 15 µL of serum obtained by venipuncture from the same patient and analysed on the same day. The results were compared to the Western Blot (WB) LDBIO TOXO II test used as another reference standard (Table 2). We found a high performance of the LDBIO Kit with a sensitivity of 96.4% [IC95 90.6–98.9%] and a specificity of 99.6% [IC95 97.3–99.9%]. The correlation of the test on blood vs serum on 349 people was high, with very little difference between the two types of samples; 4 false negatives and 1 false positive were detected. This difference compared to the other reference ELISA Bio-Rad test is negligible (Chi2, Sensitivity p = 0.99; Specificity p = 0.7) (Figure 3).
Table 2.
Results of LDBIO Kit whole blood (30 µL) fingerstick VS LDBIO Kit (15 µL) of serum obtained by venipuncture | |||
---|---|---|---|
POC Whole blood test |
POC Serum test |
Western Blot TOXO II test | |
Positive | 108 | 112 | 112 |
Negative | 236 | 237 | 237 |
5 discordant (1 false positive and 4 false negatives) | Total: 349 | ||
Performance | Sensitivity: 96.4% [IC95 90.6–98.9%] Specificity: 99.6% [IC95 97.3–99.9%] |
LDBIO kit for pregnant women
We determined the number of pregnant women enrolled in this study and the presence of Toxoplasma antibodies in 3 locations. Data are presented in Figure 4. We correlated the response of LDBIO whole blood test to ELISA tests using Bio-Rad assays and determined the sensitivity and specificity of the LDBIO test in this subpopulation. From a total of 82 pregnant women, 38 were confirmed positive and 44 negative, with only 2 discordant. Additionally, there is no significant difference (Sensitivity, p = 0.61; Specificity p = 0.74) in comparison with the general population.
Discussion
Herein, the ICT IgG–IgM (LDBIO test) for whole blood has proven to be effective in identifying patients with anti-Toxoplasma antibodies in Morocco. The sensitivity and the specificity are very high in all study sites.
Casablanca and Rabat are situated along the Atlantic Ocean and located in the west of Morocco while Tinghir, is located in the south of the High Atlas Mountains. Sidi Moumen is an arrondissement and northeastern suburb of Casablanca. It contains shantytowns and slums, and the majority of the women utilizing the community hospital has comparatively low educational levels, and therefore potentially lack awareness of the disease. In contrast, students or health professionals from ISPITS and FSAC might be more likely to have some knowledge of the disease. Rabat, and in particular the National Institute of Hygiene, is another study site, where volunteers were enrolled. The other primary study site was centre Aït Hani in Tinghir, a city centred on an oasis and composed of many smaller villages. It is located at 2000 m above sea level, south of the High Atlas Mountains. Nomads are the predominant ethnic group comprising this city’s population, with many living and working in agriculture and trade.
The POC test from areas of Casablanca (ISPITS and FSAC) showed a seroprevalence of ∼18%, with patients composed of college students, professors, and healthcare professionals. This was lower than rates reported in the literature in different cities of Morocco (e.g. Rabat 50.6% [15], Essaouira 45% [21], Kenitra 37.7%, Tetouan 42% [21]) and neighbouring countries (Algeria 47.8% [22] or Tunisia 47.7% [23]). However, patients from the same region (Casablanca) but from poor neighbourhoods (Al Waha Sidi Moumen) with many of them are illiterate, were much more likely to test positive for antibodies against the parasite. The seroprevalence was ∼44%, similar to levels reported in the literature. As expected, the same prevalence (47.1%) was seen in nomads at Aït Hani with the same association with lower socioeconomic status. This represents, to our knowledge, the first assessment of seroprevalence in this population, likely due to difficulties establishing contact with this population. These differences in seroprevalence potentially suggest that the patients in those areas are unaware of the risk of toxoplasmosis. Thus, women who participate in educational programs centred on risk factors and disease prevention have the potential to reduce exposure to the parasite and, thereby, disease burden. Anecdotally, we encountered many cases of recurrent pregnancy loss, especially in the nomadic peoples (data not shown). These women were never tested for toxoplasmosis or other congenital diseases during their first trimester and likely did not receive adequate follow-up/prenatal care. Water contamination, contact with the soil, and living with domestic animals might explain the high prevalence of T. gondii infection within this population.
After testing the initial participants, we added testing with western blot for the remaining participants. We performed a matrix study with 349 women by comparing POC from whole blood via finger stick and serum obtained by venipuncture on the same day. The results, when compared to western blot reference test measuring Toxoplasma IgG antibodies, show high performance of the LDBIO kit, (Sensitivity: 96.4% [IC95 90.6–98.9%], Specificity: 99.6% [IC95 97.3–99.9%]), with 4 false negatives and 1 false positive. Like in France and the United States, the results presented herein confirm the strong diagnostic performance of this test in a newly studied population. The global picture of the genotype of the parasites in Moroccan patients is still lacking. Only one study determined the genotypes of T. gondii occurring in Morocco as type III genotype [24]. Studies have shown that the parasitic strains in South America are more virulent than those in France and US [25]. US patients are infected with type II, I/III, I/IIIa, and atypical parasites, and French patients predominantly with type II strains. This suggests that the test performs well in diverse populations of hosts and parasites, and the data presented herein confirm the tests’ strong performance for genotypes and participants present in Morocco.
This current study made use of novel, well-validated POC blood testing, and has numerous potential “spillover” benefits for other causes of maternal/child morbidity and mortality in the country [11–13]. This approach supports the establishment of a monthly screening program for the acquisition of Toxoplasma infection during gestation with the intent of improving maternal and child health [26]. This has the potential to be especially important for the care of the nomadic peoples of Morocco with whom it has been previously difficult to establish contact. This study is the first, to our knowledge, to study the performance of POC testing for toxoplasmosis in different populations from within Morocco. Further, it provides proof of concept that POC-based screening might be feasible for other congenital infections. Recently, many countries invested in the implementation of guidelines to face public health challenges due to toxoplasmosis [27]. Examples included the congenital toxoplasmosis centres in Brazil, the Center at the Universidad del Quindio in Colombia [28]. After the implementation of these guidelines for helping pregnant women during their first trimester and with monthly testing, there was a significant reduction in the percentage of children seen with severe neurological damage in Quindio [17].
With substantial numbers of infants born with hydrocephalus due to congenital toxoplasmosis reported in regional hospital centres in Morocco [17], introducing this kit for prenatal and neonatal screening will be of potential value. It was already shown that prenatal screening and treatment of infected women reduce the risk of transmission of the parasite and sequelae in infants [10,17]. Different countries like France, Austria, Brazil, Slovenia, Uruguay, and Panama have prioritized their investments to address congenital toxoplasmosis by introducing screening. Some new measures are taken recently by the government of Morocco plan for the introduction of the POC toxoplasmosis test in 2023. Combining the Toxoplasma test in a multiplex test with other treatable or preventable congenital diseases, including rubella, CMV, hepatitis B, syphilis, and HIV, will likely further enhance screening programs in the country. As discussed above, these measures will save lives, prevent human suffering, and provide spillover benefits for maternal and child health.
Our current study in Morocco represents a step forward towards the implementation of POC diagnostics in toxoplasmosis for pregnant women. The lateral flow immunochromatography LDBIO kit detects both Toxoplasma IgG and IgM antibodies in serum and blood (as occurs during early seroconversion after acute infection). We demonstrate that among the 82 pregnant women enrolled in our study, only 2 were found to be discordant when compared to the reference test. These results hold promise given the rapid turnaround time, simplicity, and low cost. The LDBIO test can be introduced easily in the population living in mountains (i.e. Aït Hani location) at this remote site. There is difficulty with access to health care. Additionally, it could be used for mass surveillance and implemented for a POC test-based prenatal screening. Despite the need for confirmatory screening using reference tests for pregnant women testing positive during early gestation, the test is cost-saving. While the LDBIO test has strong diagnostic performance, it does not distinguish between acute and chronic infection, as it tests for the presence of both IgG and IgM against T. gondii. A positive POC test prior to 12 weeks of gestation requires further confirmatory testing and guidance from the physicians. An additional testing for avidity of antibody is required for those who have T. gondii-specific IgM.
The integration of LDBIO into a national POC test program for the prevention of acquisition of Toxoplasma by pregnant women who test negative prior to pregnancy has the potential to be of great utility, as these women are at risk of transmitting the infection to their fetus for the rest of their pregnancy. It is estimated that the cost of the LDBIO test that recognizes both IgG and IgM is $5–8. This is cheaper than the conventional test for IgG and IgM, which costs in total $16 (paid in France by the National Welfare System) or $35–$650 (paid in US), without taking into consideration the fees imposed by the hospital or healthcare facilities. These include training of healthcare personnel involved in venipuncture, sample processing, costs of required infrastructure, machine calibration, etc. Similar costs are not found in a system relying on POC testing. If the cost is $16–35 for testing once, then the total cost for a pregnant woman will be $128–280 (8 tests needed for testing across gestation; 7 tests during pregnancy and 1 test after delivery). However, $40–64 for 8 LDBIO tests is more affordable and provides the opportunity for a pregnant woman to control her own health care, facilitating early diagnosis and treatment of this infection, reducing neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the LDBIO kit test for Toxoplasma antibodies showed high accuracy and performance in low and high-risk populations from 3 geographical regions of Morocco. These results can help all pregnant women but are especially important for populations at high risk of infection and those living in mountain areas, affording access to a POC-based prenatal screening program that mitigates most of the cost of serological testing and movement to healthcare facilities.
Supplementary Material
Aknowledgement and Funding
We gratefully acknowledge LDBIO diagnostics for supporting this work and completing blindly the western blot validation tests. LDBIO had no role in data collection, exploitation and interpretation of the results. We are also grateful to Boubker Maazoz and IDMAJ Neighborhoods Association for their help and support in organizing the contact with women from marginalized neighborhoods in Casablanca. We express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Kamal Bouisk and Maria Mazouri for their help in organizing the ongoing study at ISPITS. This work was carried out under National funding from the Moroccan Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (Contrat Fincome nº435/2016) to (K. El Bissati). K. E. is a recipient of the Fulbright US Scholar Award, Investigators of medical sciences and public health. This work was also supported by the Toxoplasmosis Research Institute (TRI) at the University of Chicago and the Thrasher Foundation (to R. McLeod). We also wish to acknowledge the contributions of Dahbi, the Mann-Cornwell, Drago, Morel, Taub, Tirado, Mussilami, Samuel, Rodriguez, Rosenthal, Benhamou, Rooney, Pritzker, Kehoe, and Engel families, physicians and nurses in sites, and participants in parallel studies in the United States and in the NCCCTS.
Disclosure statement
Dr. Raphael Piarroux and Dr. Denis Limonne work at LDBIO. All authors have not reported any conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.KM Boyer, Holfels E, Roizen N, et al. . Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in mothers of infants with congenital toxoplasmosis: implications for prenatal management and screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:564–571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Demar M, Ajzenberg D, Maubon D, et al. . Fatal outbreak of human toxoplasmosis along the Maroni river: epidemiological, clinical, and parasitological aspects. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:e88–e95. doi: 10.1086/521246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Magaldi C, Elkis H, Pattoli D, et al. . Outbreak of toxoplasmosis in a Paulist seminary in Braganza (Sao Paulo state). Clinical, serological and epidemiological aspects. Rev Saude Publica. 1967;1:141–171. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101967000200003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kean BH, Kimball AC, Christenson WN.. An epidemic of acute toxoplasmosis. JAMA. 1969;208:1002–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Masur H, Jones TC, Lempert JA, et al. . Outbreak of toxoplasmosis in a family and documentation of acquired retinochoroiditis. Am J Med. 1978;64:396–402. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(78)90218-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.WR Bowie, AS King, DH Werker, et al. . Outbreak of toxoplasmosis associated with municipal drinking water. The BC Toxoplasma investigation team. Lancet. 1997;350:173–177. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)11105-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Torgerson PR, Mastroiacovo P.. The global burden of congenital toxoplasmosis: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:501–508. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.111732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McLeod REA.Management of congenital toxoplasmosis. Curr Pediatr Rep 2014;2:166–194. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Phan KK, Jalbrzikowski J, Noble AG, et al. . Longitudinal study of new eye lesions in children with toxoplasmosis who were not treated during the first year of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:375–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wallon M, Peyron F, Cornu C, et al. . Congenital toxoplasma infection: monthly prenatal screening decreases transmission rate and improves clinical outcome at age 3 years. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1223–1231. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.AR Prusa, DC Kasper, Sawers L, et al. . Congenital toxoplasmosis in Austria: prenatal screening for prevention is cost-saving. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Binquet C, Lejeune C, Seror V, et al. . The cost-effectiveness of neonatal versus prenatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0221709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stillwaggon E, Carrier CS, Sautter M, et al. . Maternal serologic screening to prevent congenital toxoplasmosis: a decision-analytic economic model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lykins J, Li X, Levigne P, et al. . Rapid, inexpensive, fingerstick, whole-blood, sensitive, specific, point-of-care test for anti-toxoplasma antibodies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.El Mansouri B, Rhajaoui M, Sebti F, et al. . Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women in Rabat, Morocco. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2007;100:289–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Laboudi M, El Mansouri B, Sebti F, et al. . Risk factors of a positive serological test for toxoplasmosis in a pregnant women in Morocco. Parasite. 2009;16:71–72. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2009161071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.El Bissati K, Levigne P, Lykins J, et al. . Global initiative for congenital toxoplasmosis: an observational and international comparative clinical analysis. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:165. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0164-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chapey E, Wallon M, Peyron F.. Evaluation of the LDBIO point of care test for the combined detection of toxoplasmic IgG and IgM. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;464:200–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.IJ Begeman, Lykins J, Zhou Y, et al. . Point-of-care testing for Toxoplasma gondii IgG/IgM using Toxoplasma ICT IgG-IgM test with sera from the United States and implications for developing countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Villard O, Cimon B, L’Ollivier C, et al. . Serological diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection: recommendations from the French National reference center for toxoplasmosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Errifaiy H, Moutaj R.. Thèse No. X. Evaluation of knowledge, behavior and immunological status of pregnant women about toxoplasmosis: epidemiological study from Essaouira-Safi region, Faculty of Medicine and pharmacy. Morocco: Cadi Ayyad University; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Messerer L, Bouzbid S, Gourbdji E, et al. . Seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women in Annaba, Algeria. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2014;62:160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.11.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fakhfakh N, Kallel K, Ennigro S, et al. . [Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii and immune status of pregnant women: cause and effect? Tunis Med. 2013;91:188–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Galal L, Ajzenberg D, Hamidovic A, et al. . Toxoplasma and Africa: one parasite, two opposite population structures. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34:140–154. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Behnke MS, Khan A, Wootton JC, et al. . Virulence differences in Toxoplasma mediated by amplification of a family of polymorphic pseudokinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:9631–9636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015338108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McLeod R, Boyer K, Karrison T, et al. . Outcome of treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis, 1981-2004: the National Collaborative Chicago-based, congenital toxoplasmosis study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1383–1394. doi: 10.1086/501360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cortes JA, Gómez JE, Silva PI, et al. . Clinical practice guideline. integral care guidelines for the prevention, early detection and treatment of pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium complications: section on toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. Infectio. 2017;21:102–116. [Google Scholar]
- 28.JE Gomez-Marin, de-la-Torre A, Angel-Muller E, et al. . First Colombian multicentric newborn screening for congenital toxoplasmosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.