Crystal structure of new formamidinium triiodide jointly refined by single-crystal XRD, Raman scattering spectroscopy and DFT assessment of hydrogen-bond network features

A novel triiodide phase of the formamidinium cation, CH₅N₂ ⁺·I₃ ⁻, crystallizes in the triclinic space group P at a temperature of 100 K. The structure consists of two independent isolated triiodide ions located on inversion centers. The centrosymmetric character of I₃ ⁻ was additionally confirmed by the observed pronounced peaks of symmetrical oscillations of I₃ ⁻ at 115–116 cm⁻¹ in Raman scattering spectra.

Abstract

A novel triiodide phase of the formamidinium cation, CH₅N₂ ⁺·I₃ ⁻, crystallizes in the triclinic space group P at a temperature of 110 K. The structure consists of two independent isolated triiodide ions located on inversion centers. The centrosymmetric character of I₃ ⁻ was additionally confirmed by the observed pronounced peaks of symmetrical oscillations of I₃ ⁻ at 115–116 cm⁻¹ in Raman scattering spectra. An additional structural feature is that each terminal iodine atom is connected with three neighboring planar formamidinium cations by N—H⋯I hydrogen bonding with the N—H⋯I bond length varying from 2.81 to 3.08 Å, forming a deformed two-dimensional framework of hydrogen bonds. A Mulliken population analysis showed that the calculated charges of hydrogen atoms correlate well with hydrogen-bond lengths. The crystal studied was refined as a three-component twin with domain ratios of 0.631 (1):0.211 (1):0.158 (1).

Chemical context  

Polyiodides are a large class of compounds with organic and inorganic cations and a great diversity of anion shapes varying from simple linear I₃ ⁻ up to I₂₉ ^3– complexes (Svensson & Kloo, 2003 ▸). Such a great diversity of cations and anions allows one to tune the chemical and physical properties of the target compounds. Consequently, polyiodides have attracted great inter­est for a wide set of applications, such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) (O‘Regan & Grätzel, 1991 ▸; Jeon et al., 2011 ▸), different electrochemical devices (Weinstein et al., 2008 ▸; Weng et al., 2017 ▸) and light-polarizing materials (Kahr et al., 2009 ▸).

Another recently proposed prospective application of polyiodides is to use liquid methyl­ammonium and formamidinium polyiodides as a precursor for the fabrication of light-absorbing materials for perovskite solar cells (Petrov, Belich et al., 2017 ▸). Whereas the application of formamidinium polyiodides was shown to be successful for scalable fabrication of solar cells with efficiencies over 17% (Turkevych et al., 2019 ▸), the structures of formamidinium polyiodides have not been studied so far.

In this work, we investigated the features of the new structure of the single-crystalline CH₅N₂ ⁺·I₃ ⁻ (I, FAI₃) phase by means of Raman scattering spectroscopy and DFT calculations.

Structural commentary  

Dark-red transparent rhombic-shaped single crystals (Fig. 1 ▸ a) were obtained by slow heating of preliminary powdered stoichiometric FAI/I₂ (FA = CH₅N₂ ⁺) mixture up to 355–358 K. Such a temperature range allowed us to obtain well-shaped single crystals as a result of recrystallization from the liquid state near its melting point, which was determined to be T_m = 360 K by visual thermal analysis.

Figure 1.

(a) FAI₃ single crystals used for the determination of the crystal structure. (b) FAI₃ crystal structure with solid lines indicating covalent bonding and dashed lines indicating the inter­molecular hydrogen bonds.

FAI₃ was found to crystallize in a triclinic unit cell, space group P . The structure (Fig. 1 ▸ b) consists of two types of isolated centrosymmetric triiodide ions (D _∞h point symmetry) located on centers of inversion. Therefore, only centrosymmetric I₃ ⁻ anions are present, which is rare for structures with relatively small cations such as formamidinium (Svensson & Kloo, 2003 ▸; Gabes & Gerding, 1972 ▸). For instance, in the CsI₃ crystal structure, the I₃ ⁻ anion is asymmetric (C_s point symmetry) with ∠(I—I—I) = 178° (Runsink et al., 1972 ▸). For a similar CH₃NH₃I/I₂ system, the CH₃NH₃I₃ structure was not isolated (Petrov et al., 2019 ▸).

The centrosymmetric character of the I₃ ⁻ anions in FAI₃ was confirmed by Raman scattering spectroscopy. The Raman spectrum recorded using a 633 nm laser (Fig. 2 ▸) contains a pronounced peak of ν₁(I₃ ⁻) symmetrical oscillations at 116 cm⁻¹ with an additional 235 cm⁻¹ 2ν₁(I₃ ⁻) peak and an asymmetrical ν₃(I₃ ⁻) component at 126 cm⁻¹ (Svensson & Kloo, 2003 ▸). The latter might be observed because of the presence of two types of I₃ ⁻ units in the structure with different environments. In addition, no splitting of symmetric oscillations is observed in the Raman spectrum because of the very small difference between the two types of I₃ ⁻ in the structure.

Figure 2.

Raman spectrum of a transparent single crystalline plate of FAI₃. Laser wavelength, 633 nm; laser power, 20 mW; accumulation time, 1 min. The insert demonstrates the results of spectroscopic analysis.

The first of the two types of I₃ ⁻ anions in FAI₃ [d(I1—I2) = 2.9165 (14) Å] is connected with three neighboring planar formamidinium cations by N—H⋯I hydrogen bonding with the bond length varying from 2.81 to 3.08 Å (Table 1 ▸), which is similar to the distances in formamidinium iodide (Petrov, Goodilin et al., 2017 ▸) as well as in other polyiodides (Petrov et al., 2019 ▸; Said et al., 2006 ▸; van Megen & Reiss, 2013 ▸). The second type of I₃ ⁻ anions are connected by two N—H⋯I hydrogen bonds of slightly reduced length and a relatively less strong C—H⋯I hydrogen bond [d(CH1A⋯I4) = 3.03 Å]. Such a difference, however, does not change significantly the distance between the central and terminal iodine atoms [2.9165 (14) vs 2.9209 (14) Å].

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) and calculated charges for the specified hydrogen atom derived according to the Mulliken scheme.

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A	H charge
C1—H1A⋯I4i	0.95	3.03	3.80 (2)	138	0.152
N1—H1B⋯I2ii	0.88	3.01	3.73 (2)	140	0.164
N1—H1C⋯I4iii	0.88	2.92	3.74 (2)	155	0.160
N2—H2A⋯I2	0.88	2.81	3.65 (2)	161	0.171
N2—H2B⋯I2iv	0.88	3.08	3.609 (19)	121	0.189
N2—H2B⋯I4v	0.88	2.94	3.66 (2)	140	0.189

Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) −x + 1, −y, −z + 1; (iii) x − 1, y − 1, z − 1; (iv) −x, y, z − 1; (v) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1.

A Mulliken population analysis showed that charges of hydrogen atoms forming a single hydrogen bond with a terminal iodine atom is +0.152 for atom H1A, which is connected with carbon, whereas it is +0.171 for atom H2A connected with nitro­gen (Table 1 ▸), which correlates with the corresponding hydrogen-bond lengths [d(CH1A⋯I4) = 3.03 Å vs d(NH2A··I2) = 2.81 Å]. For the H2B hydrogen atom, the high atomic charge (+0.189) is distributed by two hydrogen bonds. An analysis of the Bader atomic charges for the isolated cation also shows a higher charge for the H2A atom in comparison with H1A (Table 2 ▸), which correlates well with the hydrogen-bond lengths.

Table 2. Calculated Bader atomic charges for the isolated symmetric formamid­inium cation. The order of the atoms in the isolated cation matches with that in the formamidinium cation in the refined crystal structure.

C1	+1.31	H1C	+0.50
H1A	+0.18	N2	−1.23
N1	−1.23	H2A	+0.48
H1B	+0.48	H2B	+0.50

Besides, the FAI₃ structure can be represented as a pseudocubic close-packed structure with both iodine and formamidinium units in the close-packing layers (Fig. 3 ▸). In the discussed crystal structure, each center of mass of the formamidinium cation and each iodine have 12 neighbors in the first coordination sphere, resulting in a distorted cubocta­hedra occupancy, which is typical for pseudocubic close-packing. In comparison, the formamidinium iodide structure can be described as a pseudohexa­gonal close-packed structure with both iodine and formamidinium units in the close-packing layers (Petrov, Goodilin et al., 2017 ▸).

Figure 3.

Representation of FAI₃ as a deformed cubic close-packed crystal structure with both iodine and formamidinium units in the close-packing layer. Purple and violet atoms represent positions of iodine from the first and second types of I₃ ⁻, respectively. Formamidinium cations are decreased in size for clarity. (a) A single close-packed layer and (b) representation of FAI₃ as a deformed three-layered close-packed structure (the different types of alternating close-packed layers are shown in red, orange and blue).

Synthesis and crystallization  

FAI and I₂ were purchased from Dyesol (99.9% purity) and Ruskhim (99% purity) without further purification. To obtain single crystalline I, the stoichiometric FAI/I₂ mixture was previously powdered in dry air glovebox. After that, the powdered mixture was slowly heated up to 355–358 K and the obtained single crystals were used for the refinement of crystal structure.

Refinement  

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. All H atoms were found in an electron density-difference map and refined with isotropic displacement parameters. The crystal studied was refined as a three-component twin with domain ratios of 0.631 (1):0.211 (1):0.158 (1). The second and third major domains are rotated from the first one by ∼180° about reciprocal axes [101] and [110], respectively.

Table 3. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula	CH5N2 +·I3 −
M r	425.77
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P\overline{1}
Temperature (K)	110
a, b, c (Å)	6.0767 (10), 6.1886 (11), 11.727 (2)
α, β, γ (°)	97.512 (6), 100.345 (6), 99.437 (6)
V (Å3)	422.10 (13)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm−1)	11.01
Crystal size (mm)	0.26 × 0.19 × 0.08
Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker D8 Quest with Photon III detector
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2019 ▸)
Tmin, Tmax	0.044, 0.092
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	4015, 4015, 2217
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1)	0.682
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S	0.084, 0.200, 0.98
No. of reflections	4015
No. of parameters	60
No. of restraints	6
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)	2.45, −2.52

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2019 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸).

DFT calculations  

The electronic structure of the crystal FAI₃ was calculated using the DMol3 module from the Materials Studio software package (Delley, 2000 ▸, 1990 ▸). In the applied DFT method, the PBE functional was used with the DNP 4.4 (double numerical plus polarization) basis set of atomic functions with all electron relativistic core treatment. The charges (Table 4 ▸) were derived according to Mulliken’s scheme. The calculations were performed without further optimization.

Table 4. Atomic charges calculated using Mulliken population analysis.

C1	+0.003	I2	−0.388
H1A	+0.152	N2	−0.049
N1	+0.019	H2A	+0.171
H1B	+0.164	H2B	+0.189
H1C	+0.160	I3	−0.044
I1	−0.030	I4	−0.383

Computations of Bader atomic charges were performed in the GAUSSIAN 09 program (Frisch et al., 2016 ▸) using density functional theory (PBE0) (Perdew et al., 1996 ▸) and the def-2-TZVP basis set. The geometry was optimized using the very tight optimization criteria and empirical dispersion corrections on the total energy (Grimme et al., 2010 ▸) with Becke–Johnson damping (D3) (Grimme et al., 2011 ▸).

Topological analysis of the ρ(r) function, calculations of the v(r_bcp ) and integration over inter­atomic zero-flux surfaces were performed using the AIMAll program (Keith, 2013 ▸).

Supplementary Material

CCDC reference: 2087353

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

CH5N2+·I3−	Z = 2
Mr = 425.77	F(000) = 368
Triclinic, P1	Dx = 3.350 Mg m−3
a = 6.0767 (10) Å	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 6.1886 (11) Å	Cell parameters from 899 reflections
c = 11.727 (2) Å	θ = 3.5–29.1°
α = 97.512 (6)°	µ = 11.01 mm−1
β = 100.345 (6)°	T = 110 K
γ = 99.437 (6)°	Block, red
V = 422.10 (13) Å3	0.26 × 0.19 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Bruker D8 Quest with Photon III detector diffractometer	4015 independent reflections
Radiation source: micro-focus sealed X-ray tube	2217 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 7.31 pixels mm-1	θmax = 29.0°, θmin = 1.8°
φ and ω shutterless scans	h = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2019)	k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.044, Tmax = 0.092	l = 0→15
4015 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.084	H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.200	w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0803P)2 + 4.4757P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.98	(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
4015 reflections	Δρmax = 2.45 e Å−3
60 parameters	Δρmin = −2.52 e Å−3
6 restraints

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refined as a three-component twin

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Ų)

	x	y	z	Uiso*/Ueq
I1	1.000000	0.000000	0.500000	0.0261 (5)
C1	0.515 (3)	0.307 (3)	0.216 (2)	0.023 (4)
H1A	0.481532	0.352625	0.141658	0.027*
N1	0.372 (4)	0.157 (3)	0.238 (2)	0.051 (7)
H1B	0.396378	0.110694	0.306643	0.061*
H1C	0.246338	0.097725	0.185971	0.061*
I2	0.7214 (3)	0.2999 (2)	0.58692 (14)	0.0318 (5)
N2	0.705 (3)	0.406 (4)	0.2867 (17)	0.037 (5)
H2A	0.741417	0.369243	0.356493	0.044*
H2B	0.796631	0.510952	0.264606	0.044*
I3	1.000000	0.500000	1.000000	0.0258 (5)
I4	0.7825 (3)	0.8407 (2)	1.10514 (14)	0.0313 (4)

Atomic displacement parameters (Ų)

	U11	U22	U33	U12	U13	U23
I1	0.0268 (11)	0.0239 (9)	0.0270 (11)	0.0069 (8)	0.0049 (8)	0.0001 (9)
C1	0.020 (6)	0.023 (6)	0.026 (7)	0.009 (5)	0.006 (5)	−0.002 (5)
N1	0.047 (14)	0.029 (11)	0.070 (18)	0.005 (10)	0.004 (12)	−0.003 (12)
I2	0.0324 (8)	0.0297 (8)	0.0338 (10)	0.0113 (6)	0.0084 (7)	−0.0012 (7)
N2	0.036 (12)	0.055 (13)	0.025 (11)	0.009 (10)	0.015 (9)	0.011 (10)
I3	0.0297 (11)	0.0210 (9)	0.0276 (11)	0.0071 (8)	0.0067 (8)	0.0033 (8)
I4	0.0377 (9)	0.0262 (7)	0.0328 (9)	0.0128 (6)	0.0107 (7)	0.0018 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

I1—I2	2.9165 (14)	N1—H1C	0.8800
I1—I2i	2.9165 (14)	N2—H2A	0.8800
C1—N1	1.25 (3)	N2—H2B	0.8800
C1—N2	1.30 (3)	I3—I4	2.9209 (14)
C1—H1A	0.9500	I3—I4ii	2.9209 (14)
N1—H1B	0.8800
I2—I1—I2i	180.0	H1B—N1—H1C	120.0
N1—C1—N2	125 (3)	C1—N2—H2A	120.0
N1—C1—H1A	117.3	C1—N2—H2B	120.0
N2—C1—H1A	117.3	H2A—N2—H2B	120.0
C1—N1—H1B	120.0	I4—I3—I4ii	180.0
C1—N1—H1C	120.0

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+2.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Russian Science Foundation grant 18-73-10224.