Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Aug 23;34(6):1937–1940. doi: 10.1007/s13577-021-00601-4

Association of rs11549465 (C1772T) variant of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α with Covid-19 susceptibility. A population-based epidemiological study

Anamika Das 1, Maheswari Patra 2, Gunanidhi Dhangadamajhi 2,
PMCID: PMC8382105  PMID: 34426956

To the Editor,

Hypoxia in COVID-19 is the predominant clinical manifestation requiring immediate ventilation support [1, 2], failure to which may have the detrimental consequence of death. Adaptation to hypoxia is mediated through signaling via hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), all three isoforms of which differ with respect to structurally related oxygen regulated component of the heterodimer, the α subunit (HIF-1α, 2α and 3α). Of these, HIF-1α activity is reported to be high in acute or intermittent hypoxia which occur in COVID-19 [3], whereas chronic hypoxia stimulates HIF-2α release, with biological function of 3α is yet to be established [2]. However, it is still unclear whether HIF-1α signaling is beneficial against COVID-19 or is a prognostic indicator of severity and deaths [4, 5]. Since host genetic factors play a crucial role in COVID-19 outcomes and vary amongst populations, we performed a population-based association study to unravel whether HIF-1α functional variants influence worldwide heterogeneity in COVID-19 risk and deaths.

Human HIF1α gene located on chromosome 14 has several variants, of which two non-synonymous polymorphisms such as Pro582Ser [rs11549465 (C1772T)] and Ala588Thr [rs11549467 (G1790A)] are functionally important owing to their regulation of expression, stability and association with various diseases [6]. Worldwide population prevalence data of these variants in healthy controls were retrieved from relevant published papers through literature search on PubMed, Google scholars and from public-databases for genomic variants (such as ALFRED and 1000 Genomes Project). Studies with insufficient data and those deviating from Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) were excluded. This was followed by data pooling for countries having more than one data set. To nullify the possible confounding effect of vaccinations disparity, country wise COVID-19 data of 16th January, 2021 (incidence and deaths per million of population) available to us before massive vaccination drive was used for Spearman’s correlation analysis with minor allele frequency (MAF) of studied variants (in GraphPad Prism, version 5.0). A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Data for rs11549467 variant available from 74 studies affiliated to 34 countries, and rs11549465 from 111 studies belonging to 57 countries were finally enrolled. The MAF of rs11549467 ranged (0–10.8%), whereas that of rs11549465 ranged (0–25.7%) (Table 1). Since, HWE status of rs11549465 data retrieved from ALFRED database was unknown (which includes 29 studies for only rs11549465 from 19 countries), two separate correlation analysis (one by including ALFRED data under the assumption of their HWE obeyance or another by their complete exclusion) associating frequency distribution of HIF-1α variants with COVID-19 outcomes were conducted. ALFRED data was considered only when published genotype data were unavailable for a country. The results showed significant association of rs11549465 mutant allele with COVID-19 incidence, irrespective of inclusion (p = 0.0156, r = 0.319) or exclusion (p = 0.0121, r = 0.403) of ALFRED data. Further, mortality was found to be proportionately high (ALFRED data included: p = 0.0547, r = 0.26; excluded: p = 0.084, r = 0.28), although a statistically significant association could not be achieved. We did not find any association for rs11549467 with COVID-19 outcomes. Anticipating the confounding effect of altitudes of country and age of studied population, average elevation of country from sea level (Table 1) and available mean age data of enrolled studies (data not shown) were also correlated with MAF and COVID-19 outcomes. However, no association was observed.

Table 1.

Country wise minor allele frequency (MAF) data of SNPs rs11549465 and rs11549467 of HIF-1α from healthy individuals

S. no Country Average altitude
(in meter)
Covid-19 data (16th January 2021) Genotype data (rs11549465) Genotype data (rs11549467)
C/M D/M No. of studies Total samples MAF No. of studies Total samples MAF
1 India 621 7600 110 1 103 0.097 3 405 0
2 Sri Lanka 228 2420 12 2 270 0.131 1 102 0
3 Nepal 3265 9078 66 1 59 0.076
4 Malaysia 538 4759 18 2 370 0.097 1 275 0.082
5 China 1840 61 3 17 6653 0.085 15 4664 0.108
6 Taiwan 1150 36 0.3 3 743 0.077 3 743 0.079
7 South Korea 282 1400 24 5 2438 0.044 2 316 0.038
8 Japan 438 2449 34 6 1726 0.053 5 1357 0.042
9 Vietnam 398 16 0.4 1 99 0.071 1 99 0.061
10 Israel 508 58,173 425 2 540 0.145 1 300 0.003
11 Bangladesh 85 3183 48 1 87 0.093 1 86 0
12 Pakistan 900 2315 49 1 96 0.12 1 96 0
13 Yemen 999 70 20 1 37 0.257
14 Palestine 305 29,346 329 1 51 0.15
15 Kazakhstan 387 8843 124 1 45 0.078
16 Kyrgyzstan 2988 12,608 210 1 28 0.107
17 Uzbekistan 450 2310 18 1 39 0.18
18 Cambodia 126 26 1 11 0.09
19 Laos 710 6 1 59 0.059
20 Poland 173 37,796 878 3 1175 0.075 2 850 0.028
21 Hungary 143 36,342 1168 1 345 0.133
22 Finland 164 7231 111 2 200 0.052 2 290 0.008
23 Turkey 1141 27,975 279 4 400 0.168 4 466 0.01
24 Spain 660 48,160 1140 2 577 0.111 4 868 0.015
25 Austria 910 43,447 781 1 2156 0.098 2 3094 0.017
26 Sweden 320 51,659 1019 1 258 0.091 1 256 0.018
27 France 375 43,961 1070 1 463 0.107
28 Italy 538 38,939 1346 1 107 0.187 1 107 0.009
29 UK 75 48,708 1282 2 139 0.09 2 235 0.013
30 Greece 498 14,224 521 1 124 0.069
31 Ireland 118 33,527 511 1 188 0.035
32 Portugal 372 51,910 839 1 736 0.125 2 152 0
33 Czech Republic 433 82,456 1326 1 219 0.021
34 Russia 600 24,283 446 2 2333 0.079
35 Belarus 170 23,661 166 1 28 0.089
36 Denmark 34 32,430 301 1 43 0.093
37 Estonia 61 27,649 241 1 1000 0.069
38 Moldova 139 37,793 801 1 32 0.141
39 Ukraine 175 26,490 475 1 29 0.052
40 USA 760 72,592 1210 3 2379 0.105 2 1460 0.006
41 Mexico 1111 12,415 1072 3 235 0.083 4 326 0.005
42 Colombia 593 36,544 935 1 94 0.069 2 177 0
43 Brazil 320 39,340 976 5 127 0 1 88 0.04
44 Peru 1555 31,789 1164 1 85 0.029 1 85 0
45 Mozambique 345 788 7 1 149 0.238 1 150 0.006
46 Guinea-Bissau 70 1243 23 1 82 0.08 1 82 0
47 Gambia 34 1589 52 1 113 0.049 1 113 0
48 Nigeria 380 514 7 2 207 0.022 2 207 0
49 Kenya 762 1821 32 1 99 0.045 1 99 0
50 Sierra Leone 279 367 10 1 85 0.029 1 85 0
51 Tanzania 1018 8 0.3 4 128 0.057
52 Democratic Republic of the Congo 726 227 7 2 34 0.028
53 Algeria 800 2335 64 1 30 0.1
54 Namibia 1141 11,650 109 1 7 0
55 Central African Republic 635 1020 13 2 56 0.01
56 Barbados 7 3603 24 1 96 0.036 1 96 0
57 Puerto Rico 261 29,647 591 1 104 0.144 1 104 0
58 Papua New Guinea 667 92 1 2 36 0
Total 111 27,933 74 18,052

C/M cases/million, D/M deaths/million, MAF minor allele frequency, average elevation data of different countries from sea level was obtained from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average_elevation, https://www.worlddata.info and by individual search for a country

Significant association of rs11549465 mutant allele responsible for enhanced HIF-1α activity with COVID-19 susceptibility suggest HIF-1α signaling in SARS-Cov2 infection to be crucial. Study on isolated monocytes or monocytes from severe COVID-19 patients also has revealed escalated SARS-Cov2 infection under high glucose level in dose-dependent rise of HIF-1α activity [4]. Interestingly, proteome analysis of SARS-Cov2 infected cells document enhanced HIF-1α signaling [4, 7]. Further, enhanced HIF-1α activity is demonstrated in other RNA virus infection independent to hypoxia [2, 8]. Although hypoxia stimulated upregulated HIF-1α activity is described to inhibit SARS-Cov2 infection by reducing expression of host receptors for viral entry in experimental studies [1, 5, 9], these receptors being required for normal physiology; we hypothesize that their basal expression in normal oxygen level may facilitate viral infection, and hypoxia in established SARS-Cov2 infection may be detrimental. Documentary evidences supporting this hypothesis are warranted. Moreover, the beneficial role of pre-existing chronic hypoxia against COVID-19 is suggested to be due to HIF-2α activity [10], which is often antagonistic in action to HIF-1α [2]. However, lack of association of average elevation data of countries with COVID-19 outcomes and HIF1-α MAF distribution challenge the definitive protective role of high altitude against COVID-19. HIF-1α being a strong inducer for glycolytic pathway and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression [14]; enhanced HIF-1α activity may be vital for viral replication leading to viral load and cytokine storms, the two important determinants for COVID-19 mortality. Although we did not find significant association with mortality (which could be due to low MAF and small sample size), comparative study on HIF-1α activity, viral load and cytokines level in diabetic and non-diabetic COVID-19 patients may provide further insight into the mechanism of HIF-1α signaling in COVID-19 complications. Besides, rs11549465 mutant being a potential risk factor of cancer incidence [6], it may contribute to certain extent for COVID-19 associated increased severity and mortality in cancer patients [11]. We recommend large sample case–control studies for the validation of results.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge our Vice Chancellor, Prof K. K Basa for his encouragement and support of DST-FIST to our Department at Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanjadeo University. We also thankfully acknowledge the authors whose contribution have been cited.

Author contributions

GD: conceived the original idea, analyzed the data, wrote the final draft of manuscript; AD: collected data and performed preliminary data analysis, prepared the pre-draft; MP: collected data and performed preliminary data analysis.

Funding

We did not receive a fund of any kind concerning to this work.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Serebrovska ZO, Chong EY, Serebrovska TV, Tumanovska LV, Xi L. Hypoxia, HIF-1α, and COVID-19: from pathogenic factors to potential therapeutic targets. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41(12):1539–1546. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-00554-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.AbdelMassih A, Yacoub E, Husseiny RJ, Kamel A, Hozaien R, El Shershaby M, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF): the link between obesity and COVID-19. Obes Med. 2020;22:100317. doi: 10.1016/j.obmed.2020.100317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jahani M, Dokaneheifard S, Mansouri K. Hypoxia: a key feature of COVID-19 launching activation of HIF-1 and cytokine storm. J Inflamm. 2020;17(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12950-020-00263-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Codo AC, Davanzo GG, de Brito ML, de Souza GF, Muraro SP, Virgilio-da-Silva JV, et al. Elevated glucose levels favor SARS-CoV-2 infection and monocyte response through a HIF-1α/glycolysis-dependent axis. Cell Metab. 2020;32(3):437–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wing PA, Keeley TP, Zhuang X, Lee JY, Prange-Barczynska M, Tsukuda S, et al. Hypoxic and pharmacological activation of HIF inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection of lung epithelial cells. Cell Rep. 2021;35(3):109020. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yan Q, Chen P, Wang S, Liu N, Zhao P, Gu A. Association between HIF-1α C1772T/G1790A polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis based on 40 case-control studies. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bojkova D, Klann K, Koch B, Widera M, Krause D, Ciesek S, et al. Proteomics of SARS-CoV-2-infected host cells reveals therapy targets. Nature. 2020;583(7816):469–472. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2332-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ripoli M, D’Aprile A, Quarato G, Sarasin-Filipowicz M, Gouttenoire J, Scrima R, et al. Hepatitis C virus-linked mitochondrial dysfunction promotes hypoxia-inducible factor 1α-mediated glycolytic adaptation. J Virol. 2010;84(1):647–660. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00769-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Prieto-Fernández E, Egia-Mendikute L, Vila-Vecilla L, Bosch A, Barreira-Manrique A, Lee SY, et al. Hypoxia reduces cell attachment of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by modulating the expression of ACE2, neuropilin-1, syndecan-1 and cellular heparan sulfate. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10:1–19. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1932607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pun M, Turner R, Strapazzon G, Brugger H, Swenson ER. Lower incidence of COVID-19 at high altitude: facts and confounders. High Alt Med Biol. 2020;21(3):217–222. doi: 10.1089/ham.2020.0114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang H, Han H, He T, Labbe KE, Hernandez AV, Chen H, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19–infected cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113(4):371–380. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Cell are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES