Skip to main content
Genome Biology and Evolution logoLink to Genome Biology and Evolution
. 2021 Aug 7;13(8):evab182. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evab182

The “Bipartite” Structure of the First Genome of Ampelomyces quisqualis, a Common Hyperparasite and Biocontrol Agent of Powdery Mildews, May Point to Its Evolutionary Origin from Plant Pathogenic Fungi

Lauren Huth 1, Gavin J Ash 1, Alexander Idnurm 2, Levente Kiss 1, Niloofar Vaghefi 1,
Editor: Li-Jun Ma
PMCID: PMC8382677  PMID: 34363471

Abstract

Powdery mildews are among the most important plant pathogens worldwide, which are often attacked in the field by mycoparasitic fungi belonging to the genus Ampelomyces. The taxonomy of the genus Ampelomyces is unresolved, but well-supported molecular operational taxonomic units were repeatedly defined suggesting that the genus may include at least four to seven species. Some Ampelomyces strains were commercialized as biocontrol agents of crop pathogenic powdery mildews. However, the genomic mechanisms underlying their mycoparasitism are still poorly understood. To date, the draft genome of a single Ampelomyces strain, designated as HMLAC 05119, has been released. We report a high-quality, annotated hybrid draft genome assembly of A. quisqualis strain BRIP 72107, which, based on phylogenetic analyses, is not conspecific with HMLAC 05119. The constructed genome is 40.38 Mb in size, consisting of 24 scaffolds with an N50 of 2.99 Mb and 96.2% completeness. Our analyses revealed “bipartite” structure of Ampelomyces genomes, where GC-balanced genomic regions are interspersed by longer or shorter stretches of AT-rich regions. This is also a hallmark of many plant pathogenic fungi and provides further evidence for evolutionary affinity of Ampelomyces species to plant pathogenic fungi. The high-quality genome and annotation produced here provide an important resource for future genomic studies of mycoparasitisim to decipher molecular mechanisms underlying biocontrol processes and natural tritrophic interactions.

Keywords: mycoparasite, Dothideomycetes, genomic resources


Significance

Mycoparasitic fungi belonging to the genus Ampelomyces attack powdery mildews, which are important plant pathogenic fungi worldwide. Despite their ecological significance, and importance as biocontrol agents of crop pathogenic powdery mildews, limited genetic resources are available for Ampelomyces. The first high-quality assembly and annotation of the A. quisqualis genome produced here will provide an invaluable resource for genomic studies of mycoparasitism and points to possible evolutionary origin of Ampelomyces from plant pathogenic fungi.

Introduction

Powdery mildews (Erysiphaceae), common obligate biotrophic plant pathogens, are often attacked in the field by mycoparasitic fungi belonging to the genus Ampelomyces. As powdery mildews are themselves parasites, Ampelomyces spp. are also considered as hyperparasites (Kiss 2001; Parratt and Laine 2016). The natural tritrophic interactions between host plants, powdery mildews, and Ampelomyces spp. have been intensively studied in the field from an ecological context (Kiss 2008; Kiss et al. 2011; Tollenaere et al. 2014; Pintye et al. 2015; Numminen et al. 2019). Some Ampelomyces strains have been commercialized as biocontrol agents of crop pathogenic powdery mildews (Boddy 2015; Legler et al. 2016). The taxonomy of the genus Ampelomyces is unresolved, but well-supported molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) were defined suggesting that the genus may include at least four to seven species (Liang et al. 2007; Park et al. 2010; Kiss et al. 2011; Angeli et al. 2012; Pintye et al. 2012; Liyanage et al. 2018; Németh et al. 2019; Németh, Mizuno, et al. 2021). All strains belonging to the genus Ampelomyces are hyperparasites of powdery mildews just like the type species A. quisqualis. The name A. quisqualis has been applied to phylogenetically diverse Ampelomyces hyperparasites belonging to different MOTUs (Park et al. 2010; Angeli et al. 2012; Liyanage et al. 2018), which highlights the need for a taxonomic reassessment of this binomial (Kiss et al. 2004; Legler et al. 2016). Experiments with Ampelomyces transformants exhibiting the green fluorescent protein (GFP) indicated that these hyperparasites cannot thrive as saprobes; living powdery mildew colonies constitute their primary niche (Németh et al. 2019).

The GFP study has established a framework for a molecular genetic toolbox for Ampelomyces strains (Németh et al. 2019), which was later applied in a gene knock-out project (Németh, Li, et al. 2021). In terms of genomic resources, these hyperparasites are largely unexplored: to date, the draft genome of a single Ampelomyces strain, designated as HMLAC 05119, has been released (Haridas et al. 2020). The strain was isolated from an undetermined powdery mildew infecting Youngia japonica in China (Liang C, personal communication). The transcriptome of another Ampelomyces strain, CNCM I-807 or M-10, which was commercialized as the active ingredient of the AQ10 Biofungicide product in the United States and the European Union (Legler et al. 2016), is the only other genomic resource available to date for the genus Ampelomyces. The AQ10 strain was isolated from an undetermined powdery mildew infecting Catha edulis in Israel (Legler et al. 2016). The analysis of its transcriptome during the early and the late stages of parasitism revealed the upregulation of some genes related to toxin biosynthesis, together with other potentially mycoparasitism-related proteins such as secreted proteases and putative virulence factors during mycoparasitism (Siozios et al. 2015). However, approximately 50% of the Ampelomyces transcripts did not point to any known protein sequences (Siozios et al. 2015). This may indicate that a part of the Ampelomyces proteome is unique, or this type of mycoparasitism has not been studied in sufficient detail in other interfungal parasitic relationships.

Here, we present a high-quality, annotated hybrid draft genome assembly of A.quisqualis strain BRIP 72107. Our phylogenetic analysis presented here revealed that BRIP 72107 is not conspecific with HMLAC 05119, the only Ampelomyces strain with a known genome (Haridas et al. 2020). BRIP 72107 is, however, conspecific with the commercial AQ10 strain, and both belong to the MOTU that has included many Ampelomyces strains newly isolated from the field in diverse studies in China, Europe, Japan, the United States, and Korea (Liang et al. 2007; Park et al. 2010; Kiss et al. 2011; Pintye et al. 2012; Liyanage et al. 2018; Németh, Mizuno, et al. 2021). Therefore, this genome will be useful to decipher molecular mechanisms underlying both biocontrol processes and natural tritrophic interactions.

Results and Discussion

Genome Assembly and Annotation

Ampelomyces quisqualis strain BRIP 72107 was assembled into 24 scaffolds with a total assembly size of 40,378,121 bp and genome completeness of 96.2% (table 1). Of the total of 3,786 Dothideomycetes Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCOs) searched, BRIP 72107 included 3,641 complete (96.2%), 16 fragmented (0.4%), and 129 missing (3.4%) BUSCOs. Based on a genome size of 42 Mb estimated by Jellyfish, and a total of 8.8 and 8 Gb of sequence data generated by MinION and Illumina MiSeq platforms, respectively, we estimate a genome coverage of 400×. A combination of ab initio and evidence-based gene modeling with two additional rounds of gene predictions after training SNAP in Maker pipeline resulted in 22,470 predicted exons within 10,439 genes (including 7,255 evidence-supported gene models), including 4,203 with 3’-UTRs and 4,345 with 5’-UTRs.

Table 1.

Genome Statistics for Ampelomyces Strains Sequenced to Date

Straina Powdery Mildew Host Plant Host Assembly Size (Mb) Covb No. of Contigs Contig N50 (bp) No. of Scaffolds Scaffold N50 (bp) No. of Ns per Mb GC Content (%) Genome Completeness (%)c NCBI Accession Number
BRIP 72107 Golovinomyces bolayi Cestrum parqui 40.38 400× 25 2,994,887 24 2,994,887 2 45.4 96.2 JAGTXZ000000000
HMLAC 05119 Undetermined powdery mildew Youngia japonica 36.81 103× 468 258,565 73 4,300,649 9,771 46.4 96.3 VOSX00000000.1
a

Strain BRIP 72107 was sequenced in the current study. HMLAC 05119 was obtained from the JGI Genome Portal (Haridas et al. 2020).

b

Genome coverage.

c

Genome completeness for the two genomes was determined based on benchmarking universal single-copy orthologs (BUSCOs) (Simão et al. 2015) against the dothideomycetes_odb10 database.

Bipartite Genome of A. quisqualis

The genome of BRIP 72107 has a bimodal GC content, due to the presence of gene-rich, GC-balanced regions interspersed by long or short stretches of AT-rich, gene-sparse regions (fig. 1). This phenomenon was observed in almost all the assembled contigs, with AT-rich regions varying in size from 15 to 270 kb. The “bipartite” feature of the genome is also a hallmark of many plant pathogenic fungi that is hypothesized to arise when duplicated DNA, such as transposons, undergoes C to T transitions by the process of repeat-induced point mutation (Testa et al. 2016). This substantial proportion of repetitive and AT-rich regions has been proposed to result in the “two-speed” evolution of these genomes, where genes located close to the AT-rich regions (mostly secreted proteins) have higher rates of evolution (Dong et al. 2015). Recent analyses revealed a surprisingly close phylogenetic relationship between Ampelomyces mycoparasites and plant pathogens such as Parastagonospora nodorum and Leptosphaeria maculans (Haridas et al. 2020), and the Ampelomyces genus is classified in the Leptosphaeriaceae family that includes many plant pathogens and other plant-associated species. These results, together with the bipartite genome structures of all these fungi, may point to the evolutionary origin of Ampelomyces from plant pathogenic fungi.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The first 1,400,000 bp of BRIP 72107 contig-4 is demonstrated here as an example showing GC-balanced regions interspersed by longer or shorter stretches of AT-rich regions (A). The GC content distribution of Ampelomyces spp. (B and C) show striking similarity to the plant pathogenic fungus, Leptosphaeria maculans (D). Vertical blue lines show the GC cut-off points selected by OcculterCut (Testa et al. 2016) to classify genome segments into distinct AT-rich and GC-balanced regions. The percentage values shown on the left and right sides of the vertical blue lines indicate the percentage of the genome classified as AT-rich and GC-balanced, respectively. (E) The majority rule consensus Bayesian phylogram inferred from the internal transcribed spacer sequences of the nuclear ribosomal DNA and the intervening 5.8S region (TreeBASE no. 28185). Tip labels include Ampelomyces strain number, the powdery mildew host, the plant host, and the country of origin. NCBI GenBank accession numbers used to construct the tree are provided in parentheses. The tip labels in bold represent Ampelomyces strains with available whole genome assemblies: BRIP 72107 sequenced in the current study and HMLAC 05119 (Haridas et al. 2020). Bayesian posterior probability values are shown at the branches. The tree is rooted to Phoma herbarum strain CBS 276.37. The scale bar represents nucleotide substitutions per site.

Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis of 28 Ampelomyces strains based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA), including the 5.8S rRNA gene, revealed a high level of diversity within the genus Ampelomyces, with nine well-supported MOTUs (fig. 1E), which highlighted the need for a taxonomic reassessment of the genus Ampelomyces. Strain BRIP 72107 belonged to the strongly supported clade/MOTU 1, together with the commercial strain AQ10, whereas HMLAC 05119 was part of MOTU 4. This indicated that the two strains are not conspecific. Another strain, 94013, commercialized as Q-fect in Korea (Park et al. 2010), also belonged to MOTU 4. Previous phylogenetic analyses of Ampelomyces strains also concluded that the genus consists of multiple species (Liang et al. 2007; Park et al. 2010; Kiss et al. 2011; Angeli et al. 2012; Pintye et al. 2012; Liyanage et al. 2018).

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection and Culturing

Strain BRIP 72107 was isolated from Golovinomyces bolayi infecting Cestrum parqui collected in Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia. The strain is available from the Queensland Plant Pathology Herbarium (BRIP), which includes a large collection of living fungal and bacterial strains, in addition to herbarium specimens. The isolation process was done as described by Liang et al. (2007). The identity of strain BRIP 72107 as Ampelomyces was confirmed via sequencing the nrDNA ITS region using universal primers ITS1-F (Gardes and Bruns 1993) and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). Four-week-old mycelia of BRIP 72107 grown in potato dextrose broth were lyophilized overnight. One hundred milligrams of lyophilized mycelia were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground with stainless steel beads (2.8 mm diameter; Sigma–Aldrich) in a FastPrep-24 (MP Biomedicals, Australia) at 6.5 m/s for 30 s and stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction.

DNA and RNA Extraction

For long-read sequencing, high-molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using a chloroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction method with an isopropanol precipitation as described by Feehan et al. (2017). Briefly, ground mycelia were lysed in 700 µl lysis buffer (potassium metabisulfite 0.25 M, Tris 0.2 M pH 7.5, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 50 mM, NaCl 2 M, 2% CTAB, ddH2O) pre warmed to 65 °C with 300 µl 5% Sarcosyl prewarmed to 65 °C and incubated for 30 min at 65 °C. DNA was isolated by chloroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction and subsequent isopropanol precipitation. RNase (10 mg/ml) treatment was performed for 2 h at 37 °C and finally the DNA was cleaned with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter). HMW DNA was purified using the Qiagen Genomic-tip 20/G kit according to manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using the Qubit v.3.0 fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Australia). Quality ratios were checked using the Denovix DS-11 series (Life Science Technologies) and the integrity was assessed through electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel containing 1:20,000 GelRed (Biotium, Australia), then stored at −20 °C. For Illumina MiSeq sequencing, DNA was extracted from lyophilized fungal mycelia using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Australia) according to manufacturer’s instructions, except for the final step where DNA was eluted in 10 mM filter-sterilized Tris–HCl (pH 8.5).

Total RNA from fresh fungal mycelia flash-frozen and ground in liquid nitrogen was extracted using an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions using the purification of total RNA from plant cells and tissue and filamentous fungi. The final product was checked via agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified using a Qubit v.3.0 fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Australia) and submitted to the Australian Genome Research Facility (Melbourne, Australia) for total mRNA sequencing.

Genome Sequencing

Long-read sequencing was performed using Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT). A MinION library was constructed from 1,000 ng DNA using a Genomic DNA by Ligation kit (SQK-LSK109; ONT, Oxford, United Kingdom) according to the standard protocol. The library was loaded onto a MinION FLO-MIN 106 R9.4.1 flow cell and sequenced for 39 h. Read quality statistics were assessed using Nanoplot v.1.28.2 on Galaxy Australia Portal (Afgan et al. 2018). For Illumina short-read sequencing, library preparation was conducted on 150 ng DNA using an Illumina DNA Prep kit and Nextera DNA CD Indexes (Illumina, Singapore) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The library was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform using a 600-cycle paired-end V3 reagents kit. Read quality statistics were assessed using FastQC v.0.11.8 (Andrews 2010) on Galaxy Australia Portal.

Read Preparation, Genome Assembly, and Annotation

All raw data were screened and filtered for bacterial contamination using Kraken v.2.1.1 (Wood and Salzberg 2014). Adapter removal from Illumina reads was conducted using BBduk from the BBmap suite v.36.86 (Bushnell 2014). The Kmer counting software Jellyfish v.2.3.0 (Marçais and Kingsford 2011) was implemented to estimate the genome size using the Illumina reads. Porechop v.0.2.4 (Wick 2017) was used for adapter removal from the raw MinION reads. The hybrid assembler MaSuRCA v.3.3.3 (Zimin et al. 2013) was used. Raw Illumina reads without barcode-removal and quality filtering were used for MaSuRCA assembly as recommended by the developer. The completeness of the genome assembly was evaluated via Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) v.1.2 (Simão et al. 2015). Genome statistics of the generated assembly were compared with that of HMLAC 05119 (Haridas et al. 2020) using Quast v.2.0.5 (Gurevich et al. 2013). The program OcculterCut v.1.1 (Testa et al. 2016) was used to scan the genome of A. quisqualis strain BRIP 72107, Ampelomyces sp. strain HMLAC 05119 (Haridas et al. 2020), and Leptosphaeria maculans strain v.23.1.3 (Rouxel et al. 2011) to determine their percent GC content distribution.

Transcriptome assembly was conducted using Trinity v.2.10.0 (Grabherr et al. 2011). Genome annotation was conducted using Maker v.2.31.9 (Cantarel et al. 2008). A repeat library was generated with RepeatModeler v.2.0.1 (Smit and Hubley 2008) and repeats were masked prior to annotation. A first round of RNA-evidenced gene prediction was conducted using Maker. The resulting annotation was used to produce a hidden Markov model (HMM) profile for A. quisqualis, which was further refined with a second round of SNAP training and used for the final annotation (Cantarel et al. 2008).

Phylogenetics Analyses

To depict the molecular diversity within the genus Ampelomyces and phylogenetic relationship of strains BRIP 72107 and HMLAC 05119, a Bayesian phylogram was constructed using MrBayes v.3.2.4 (Ronquist et al. 2012) based on the GTR+I+G nucleotide substitution model selected using PAUP v.4.0b10 (Swofford and Sullivan 2003) and MrModeltest v.2.3. (Nylander 2004). ITS sequences of reference isolates were obtained from NCBI GenBank database. An ITS sequence was not available for strain HMLAC 05119; therefore, ITS sequence of BRIP 72107 was used as a query against its published genome (GenBank accession number: VOSX00000000.1) to extract the ITS region of HMLAC 05119 and include in the phylogenetic analysis.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the University of Southern Queensland, Australia, and project DP210103869 of the Australian Research Council. We are grateful to Dr Chen Liang (Qingdao Agricultural University, China) for providing information about strain HMLAC 05119. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Data Availability

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at GenBank under the accession number JAGTXZ000000000. The version described in this article is version JAGTXZ010000000. The alignment and phylogenetic tree are deposited in TreeBASE (No. 28185).

Literature Cited

  1. Afgan E, et al. 2018. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46(W1):W537–W544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews S.2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. [Google Scholar]
  3. Angeli D, Maurhofer M, Gessler C, Pertot I.. 2012. Existence of different physiological forms within genetically diverse strains of Ampelomyces quisqualis. Phytoparasitica 40(1):37–51. [Google Scholar]
  4. Boddy L.2015. Interactions between fungi and other microbes. In: Watkinson S, Boddy L, Money N, editors. The fungi. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 337–360. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bushnell B.2014. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner (No. LBNL-7065E). Berkeley (CA): Lawrence Berkeley National Lab (LBNL). [Google Scholar]
  6. Cantarel BL, et al. 2008. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 18(1):188–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong S, Raffaele S, Kamoun S.. 2015. The two-speed genomes of filamentous pathogens: waltz with plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 35:57–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feehan JM, et al. 2017. Purification of high molecular weight genomic DNA from powdery mildew for long-read sequencing. J Vis Exp. 121:e55463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardes M, Bruns TD.. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 2(2):113–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grabherr MG, et al. 2011. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat Biotechnol. 29(7):644–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G.. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29(8):1072–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haridas S, et al. 2020. 101 Dothideomycetes genomes: a test case for predicting lifestyles and emergence of pathogens. Stud Mycol. 96:141–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kiss L.2001. The role of hyperparasites in host plant – parasitic fungi relationships. In: Jeger MJ, Spence NJ, editors. Biotic interactions in plant-pathogen associations. Wallingford (United Kingdom): CABI Publishing International. p. 227–236. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kiss L.2008. Intracellular mycoparasites in action: interactions between powdery mildew fungi and Ampelomyces. In: Avery SV, Stratford M, van West P, editors. Stress in yeasts and filamentous fungi. London: Academic Press. p. 37–52. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kiss L, et al. 2011. Temporal isolation explains host‐related genetic differentiation in a group of widespread mycoparasitic fungi. Mol Ecol. 20(7):1492–1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kiss L, Russell JC, Szentiványi O, Xu X, Jeffries P.. 2004. Biology and biocontrol potential of Ampelomyces mycoparasites, natural antagonists of powdery mildew fungi. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 14(7):635–651. [Google Scholar]
  17. Legler SE, et al. 2016. Sporulation rate in culture and mycoparasitic activity, but not mycohost specificity, are the key factors for selecting Ampelomyces strains for biocontrol of grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator). Eur J Plant Pathol. 144(4):723–736. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liang C, et al. 2007. Genetic diversity of Ampelomyces mycoparasites isolated from different powdery mildew species in China inferred from analyses of rDNA ITS sequences. Fungal Divers. 24:225–240. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liyanage KK, et al. 2018. Morpho-molecular characterization of two Ampelomyces spp. (Pleosporales) strains mycoparasites of powdery mildew of Hevea brasiliensis. Front Microbiol. 9:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Marçais G, Kingsford C.. 2011. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27(6):764–770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Németh MZ, et al. 2019. Green fluorescent protein transformation sheds more light on a widespread mycoparasitic interaction. Phytopathology 109(8):1404–1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Németh MZ, Li G, et al. 2021. What is the role of the nitrate reductase (euknr) gene in fungi that live in nitrate-free environments? A targeted gene knock-out study in Ampelomyces mycoparasites. Fungal Biol. Available from: 10.1016/j.funbio.2021.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Németh MZ, Mizuno Y, et al. 2021. Ampelomyces strains isolated from diverse powdery mildew hosts in Japan: their phylogeny and mycoparasitic activity, including timing and quantifying mycoparasitism of Pseudoidium neolycopersici on tomato. PLoS One 16(5):e0251444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Numminen E, Vaumourin E, Parratt SR, Poulin L, Laine A.. 2019. Variation and correlations between sexual, asexual and natural enemy resistance life-history traits in a natural plant pathogen population. BMC Evol Biol. 19(1):142–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nylander JAA.2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. [Google Scholar]
  26. Park MJ, Choi YJ, Hong SB, Shin HD.. 2010. Genetic variability and mycohost association of Ampelomyces quisqualis isolates inferred from phylogenetic analyses of ITS rDNA and actin gene sequences. Fungal Biol. 114(2–3):235–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Parratt SR, Laine AL.. 2016. The role of hyperparasitism in microbial pathogen ecology and evolution. ISME J. 10(8):1815–1822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pintye A, et al. 2012. No indication of strict host associations in a widespread mycoparasite: grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator) is attacked by phylogenetically distant Ampelomyces strains in the field. Phytopathology 102(7):707–716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pintye A, et al. 2015. Host phenology and geography as drivers of differentiation in generalist fungal mycoparasites. PLoS One 10(3):e0120703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ronquist F, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61(3):539–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rouxel T, et al. 2011. Effector diversification within compartments of the Leptosphaeria maculans genome affected by repeat-induced point mutations. Nat Commun. 2:202–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM.. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31(19):3210–3212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Siozios S, et al. 2015. Transcriptional reprogramming of the mycoparasitic fungus Ampelomyces quisqualis during the powdery mildew host-induced germination. Phytopathology 105(2):199–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Smit AFA, Hubley R.. 2008. –2015. RepeatModeler Open-1.0. [accessed Mar 2020]. Available from: http://www.repeatmasker.org. [Google Scholar]
  35. Swofford DL, Sullivan J.. 2003. Phylogeny inference based on parsimony and other methods using PAUP. In: Salemi M, Vandamme A-M, editors. The phylogenetic handbook: a practical approach to DNA and protein phylogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 160–206. [Google Scholar]
  36. Testa AC, Oliver RP, Hane JK.. 2016. OcculterCut: a comprehensive survey of AT-rich regions in fungal genomes. Genome Biol Evol. 8(6):2044–2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tollenaere CB, et al. 2014. A hyperparasite affects the population dynamics of a wild plant pathogen. Mol Ecol. 23(23):5877–5887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. White TJ, et al. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wick RR.2017. Porechop: adapter trimmer for Oxford nanopore reads. Available from: https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wood DE, Salzberg SL.. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15(3):R46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zimin AV, et al. 2013. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics. 29(21):2669–2677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at GenBank under the accession number JAGTXZ000000000. The version described in this article is version JAGTXZ010000000. The alignment and phylogenetic tree are deposited in TreeBASE (No. 28185).


Articles from Genome Biology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES