Abstract
The intestinal microbiota generates many different metabolites which are critical for the regulation of host signaling pathways. In fact, a wide-range of diseases are associated with increased levels of local or systemic microbe-derived metabolites. In contrast, certain bacterial metabolites, such as tryptophan metabolites, are known to contribute to both local and systemic homeostasis. Chronic alcohol consumption is accompanied by alterations to intestinal microbial communities, and their functional capacities. However, little is known about the role of alcohol-associated dysbiosis on host defense against bacterial pneumonia. Our previous work using fecal transplantation demonstrated that alcohol-associated intestinal dysbiosis, independent of ethanol consumption, increased susceptibility to Klebsiella pneumonia. Here, we demonstrate that intestinal microbiota treatments mitigate the increased risk of alcohol-associated pneumonia. Treatment with the microbial metabolite indole or with probiotics reduced pulmonary and extrapulmonary bacterial burden, restored immune responses, and improved cellular trafficking required for host defense. Protective effects were, in part, mediated by aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR), as inhibition of AhR diminished the protective effects. Thus, alcohol appears to impair the production/processing of tryptophan catabolites resulting in immune dysregulation and impaired cellular trafficking. These data support microbiota therapeutics as novel strategies to mitigate the increased risk for alcohol-associated bacterial pneumonia.
Subject terms: Bacterial infection, Bacterial host response, Microbiome, Risk factors
Samuelson et al show that alcohol impairs the production/processing of microbial metabolites, specifically tryptophan catabolites, resulting in immune dysregulation and impaired cellular trafficking for optimal host defense. The metabolite, indole, or probiotics making indole metabolites mitigate alcohol-induced susceptibility to Klebsiella-associated pneumonia, and that the mechanisms are partially dependent on AhR.
Introduction
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and respiratory infections are major global health burdens1,2. AUDs are an established risk factor for bacterial pneumonia3. Patients with AUDs are more frequently infected with highly virulent respiratory pathogens, and experience increased morbidity and mortality from these infections when they occur. Klebsiella pneumoniae infections are overrepresented in pneumonia patients with AUD3,4, and AUD patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired Klebsiella pneumonia experience almost double the mortality of AUD patients infected with other pathogens4.
There are several potential mechanisms by which AUD increase the risk of pneumonia. These include aspiration of microbes from the upper alimentary tract, decreased mucus-facilitated clearance of bacterial pathogens from the upper airway, and impaired pulmonary host defenses5. In addition, the prevalence of oropharyngeal colonization with K. pneumoniae may be as much as four times higher in patients with AUD compared with non-AUD patients6. The colonization by pathogenic organisms, combined with the acute intoxicating effects of alcohol and the subsequent depression of the normally protective gag and cough reflexes, leads to more frequent and severe pneumonias due to Gram-negative organisms. Further, chronic alcohol feeding decreases the number of circulating lymphocytes and impairs immune responses, such as Th1 and Th17 responses to various challenges7–9. Together, impaired innate and adaptive immunity, and increased pathogen colonization collectively increase the risk of pneumonia in AUD patients3,10,11.
Chronic alcohol ingestion leads to bacterial overgrowth and dysbiosis in the small and large intestinal tract of animals and humans12–16. The increase in both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria is most pronounced in the proximal small intestine in alcohol-fed mice16, but also extends to the large intestine as early as 1 week after alcohol feeding15. Chronic ethanol feeding also reduces; amino acid metabolism, levels of short-chain, and saturated long-chain fatty acids17–19, and bile acid metabolism in the gut20. Together, these data demonstrate that chronic alcohol use is associated with impairments in mechanisms that maintain intestinal microbiota homeostasis. While the taxonomic composition of the alcohol-associated gut microbiome has been characterized, we are just beginning to understand the functional consequences of alcohol-dysbiosis. However, advances in metabolomics have helped further our understanding of the mechanisms by which intestinal dysbiosis affect distal organ systems. Specifically, bacterial products (e.g., LPS, flagellin, bacterial DNA, peptidoglycans) cross the epithelial barrier, enter the systemic circulation, and trigger a potent inflammatory response21. Yet, certain bacterial metabolites are known to contribute to both local and systemic homeostasis. For example, indole derivatives of tryptophan catabolism by bacterial species have been shown to play an important role during many chronic diseases22–26.
Preclinical evidence demonstrates that the intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in the immune response to bacterial and viral respiratory infections27–30. We have previously shown that alcohol-associated dysbiosis, independent of ethanol, increased susceptibility to Klebsiella pneumonia31. Increased susceptibility was associated with increased intestinal permeability and altered immune cell numbers in both the lungs and intestinal tract. Similarly, we found that microbial products associated with alcohol-induced dysbiosis increased permeability, as well as immune activation in an ex-vivo model system32. However, it is not clear how altered microbial products contribute to alcohol-associated pneumonia, or whether restoration of microbial metabolites could mitigate alcohol-associated pneumonia. This study sought to investigated, whether targeting the intestinal microbiota could mitigate the increased risk of alcohol-associated pneumonia via alterations to the composition of the microbiota and cellular trafficking.
Results
Microbiota supplementation mitigates alcohol-associated pneumonia
Our previous data suggest that therapeutic targeting of the intestinal microbiota during alcohol-consumption could mitigate alcohol-associated impairments in host defense. Here, we sought to investigated whether microbial supplementation could mitigate the increased risk of alcohol-associated pneumonia. We chose two microbiota-targeting approaches for the prevention of alcohol-associated pneumonia: (1) a probiotic cocktail (containing Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus), and (2) the microbial specific tryptophan catabolite indole. Our experimental model is shown in Fig. 1a. Neither alcohol feeding nor treatments influenced body weight (Supplemental Fig. 1a), daily food intake (Supplemental Fig. 1b), or blood alcohol levels (Supplemental Fig. 1c). We first assessed the effects of microbiota-targeting treatments on susceptibility to K. pneumoniae in alcohol-fed mice. Alcohol-fed mice had a higher pulmonary burden of K. pneumoniae, after 48 h of post-infection, compared to control mice (Fig. 1b), and increased dissemination of pulmonary infection compared to control mice (Fig. 1c). Treatment with indole or probiotics reduced pulmonary and extra-pulmonary K. pneumoniae burden in alcohol-fed mice (Fig. 1b, c). As alcohol-feeding is known to cause increased epithelial permeability and decreased numbers of mucosal immune cells8,23, we examined mucosal permeability as well as pulmonary and intestinal immune responses following K. pneumoniae infection. Alcohol-fed mice exhibited marked increases in pulmonary and intestinal permeability as measured by circulating levels of surfactant protein-D (SDP-1; a recognized biomarker of lung damage33) and intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (IFABP; a recognized biomarker of intestinal damage34,35), respectively (Fig. 2a, b) suggesting an increase in pulmonary and intestinal permeability. However, in alcohol-fed mice indole or probiotic treatment reduced both SDP-1 and IFABP to levels that were indistinguishable from control-fed mice after infection with K. pneumoniae (Fig. 2a, b). Finally, we evaluated the number of pulmonary and intestinal immune cell 48 h post-infection. Our flow cytometry gating strategy is shown in Fig. 2c. There was a marked decrease in the number of immune cells in the lungs of alcohol-fed mice. In contrast, we found an increase in the number of intestinal immune cells in alcohol-fed mice compared to control-fed mice (Fig. 2d, e). Similar to the results found for epithelial permeability, both pulmonary and intestinal immune cell numbers were restored to control-fed levels in alcohol-fed mice treated with either indole or the probiotic cocktail (Fig. 2d, e).
Microbiota supplementation mitigates alcohol-associated pneumonia via aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling
The intestinal microbiota modulates aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR) signaling via production of tryptophan catabolites26. We sought to investigate the role of AhR in indole and probiotic mediated mitigation of alcohol-associated pneumonia, by treatment with the AhR inhibitor CH-223191. Additionally, we utilized heat-killed probiotics to determine if viable probiotics are required for the protective effects or if the microbial components of the probiotics are sufficient. The experimental model/timeline is shown in Fig. 3a. Neither alcohol feeding nor treatments had an effect on body weight (Supplemental Fig. 2a), daily food intake (Supplemental Fig. 2b), or blood alcohol levels (Supplemental Fig. 2c). Similar to the previous experiment, alcohol-fed mice had a higher pulmonary burden of K. pneumoniae, as well as extra-pulmonary K. pneumoniae after 48 h of infection compared to control mice (Fig. 3b, c, respectively). Treatment with indole or probiotics reduced pulmonary and extra-pulmonary K. pneumoniae burden in alcohol-fed mice (Fig. 3b, c, respectively), while inhibition of AhR mitigated the protective effects of indole. Probiotic-mediated effects were less affected by AhR inhibition. There was an overall reduction in pulmonary burden that failed to reach statistical significance, suggesting that probiotics may target multiple pathways along the gut-lung axis. Forty-eight hours post K. pneumoniae infection, alcohol-fed mice exhibited marked increases in pulmonary and intestinal permeability as measured by circulating levels of SDP-1 and IFABP, respectively (Fig. 4a, b). However, in alcohol-fed mice treated with indole or with the probiotic cocktail pulmonary and intestinal permeability were reduced and were indistinguishable for control fed mice. Similarly, heat-killed probiotics provided protection against alcohol-associated pulmonary and intestinal damage. The protective effects of indole or probiotics was dependent on AhR signaling, as inhibition of AhR ablated the protective effects (Fig. 4a, b). We then evaluated the number of pulmonary (Fig. 4c) and intestinal (Fig. 4d) immune cell 48 h post-infection, and found a decrease in the number of immune cells in the lungs but an increase in the number of intestinal immune cells in alcohol-fed mice, compared to control-fed mice. However, both pulmonary and intestinal immune cell numbers were restored to control-fed levels in alcohol-fed mice treated with either indole or the probiotic cocktail (Fig. 4c, d, respectively). Immune cell numbers were not different in alcohol-fed mice treated with heat-killed probiotics or live probiotics. The protective effects of indole or probiotics were likewise dependent on AhR signaling, as inhibition of AhR prevented normalization of immune cell numbers (Fig. 4c, d).
Alcohol consumption has been previously shown to decrease IL-22 expression/secretion in the intestinal tract of mice23,36. The intestinal microbiota can modulate IL-22 production via production of tryptophan catabolites, which are ligands for aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR)26. As such, we sought to investigate the expression/secretion of IL-22 in indole and probiotic-treated mice. Similar to the previous experiment, alcohol-fed mice had a higher pulmonary burden of K. pneumoniae 48 h post-infection compared to control mice (Fig. 5a). Treatment with indole or probiotics reduced pulmonary K. pneumoniae burden in alcohol-fed mice (Fig. 5a), while inhibition of AhR mitigated the protective effects of indole. We also evaluated the frequency of IL-22-expressing pulmonary and intestinal immune cells (gated on CD3− AhR+). Gating strategy for IL-22-expressing cells is shown in Fig. 5b. The percent of IL-22-expressing cells was reduced in ethanol-fed mice compared with controls mice (Fig. 5c, d). Further, treatment with indole or probiotics increased the frequency of IL-22+ cells in the lungs and intestines of alcohol-fed mice (Fig. 5c, d), while inhibition of AhR mitigated the protective effects.
In addition, we further confirmed the role of AhR and IL-22 in our model by evaluating the gene expression of Ahr, Cyp1a1 and Il22 in the lung and small intestine of alcohol-fed and treated mice. AhR activation regulates the expression of both Cyp1a1 and IL-2237. Ethanol-fed mice had a decrease in level of Ahr, cyp1a1, and Il22 mRNA in the lungs and intestines compared to pair-fed mice (Fig. 6a–f). Similar to our flow cytometry data, the expression of Ahr, cyp1a1, and Il22 was restored to levels similar to control animals following treatment with indole or probiotics (Fig. 6a–f). Further, inhibition of AhR with CH-223191 mitigated the increased expression of Ahr, cyp1a1, and Il22 mRNA in treated mice (Fig. 6a–f).
Microbiota supplementation restores cecal tryptophan catabolite levels
We then sought to investigate the levels of indole in the cecum, the serum, and the lungs of alcohol-fed mice with and without microbiota supplementation to assess the potential of extra-intestinal indole signaling. Indole levels were decrease in the cecum and the serum of alcohol-fed mice compared to control mice (Fig. 7a, b), while indole levels were below the limit of detection in the lungs of alcohol-fed and control-fed mice (Fig. 7c). Alcohol-fed mice treated with indole had increased levels of indole in all tissues, regardless of treatment with CH223191, which suggests that AhR inhibition does not affect indole levels. (Fig. 7a–c). In fact, indole was only detectable in the lung tissue of animals receiving indole supplementation. In addition, alcohol-fed mice treated with probiotics or heat-killed probiotics exhibited a non-significant increase in cecal indole levels, and only a modest increase in serum indole levels (Fig. 7a–c). Probiotics did not increase pulmonary indole levels. Suggesting that probiotics likely improve host defense via multiple mechanisms. We also examined the level of several other tryptophan catabolites following treatment with indole or probiotics. The following tryptophan catabolites: indole-3-sulfate, indole-3-acetic acid, and indole-3-lactic acid were decrease in alcohol-fed mice compared to control mice (Supplemental Fig. 3a–d). Treatment with indole restored catabolite levels to control levels, while probiotic treatment restored all catabolites except indole-3-lactic acid (Supplemental Fig. 3d). Indole-3-propionic acid levels were not affected by alcohol-feeding or by the treatments.
Intestinal microbial products increase AhR activation
To further evaluate the role of the intestinal microbiota on AhR activation, we utilized an AhR-luciferase reporter assay38. Specifically, we utilized the DR-EcoScreen system, which is a mouse derived cellular reporter assay for the ligand-dependent activation of AhR. We first determined the concentration of indole and CH-223191 that activate and inhibit AhR-mediated luciferase production. Indole was added to cells at concentrations ranging from 0 to 1000 μM. In addition, CH-223191 was added to indole treated wells at 30 μM. Indole treatment increase luminescence in a dose dependent manner, starting at 5 μM concentrations when compared to baseline. While treatment of cells with the AhR inhibitor CH-223191 prevented indole-mediated increases in luminescence across all concentrations of indole (Fig. 8a). We likewise confirmed the utility of the DR-EcoScreen system by treating cells with the gold-standard AhR agonist 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) at concentrations ranging from 10−15 M to 10−10 M. Similar to indole treated cells TCDD treatment increase luminescence in a dose dependent manner, and treatment with the AhR inhibitor CH-223191 prevented TCDD-mediated increases in luminescence (Supplemental Fig. 4a). While murine AhR is activated by indole, TCDD is a much more potent activator of murine AhR. In fact, indole activates AhR-mediated luminescence at ~20% of 10−10 M (maximum dose) TCDD (Supplemental Fig. 4b). We also sought to determine if the microbial products isolated form the cecum of alcohol-fed and control-fed mice exhibited differential AhR activation. Similarly, we performed a dose response with the cecal microbial products from alcohol-fed and control mice. The microbial products from either ethanol-fed or control mice resulted in activation of AhR above baseline (untreated cells), however microbial products isolated from ethanol-fed mice exhibited a decreased level of AhR activation compared to the microbial products from control mice (Fig. 8b). To further, evaluate the role of the intestinal microbiota we utilized microbial products isolated from all of the treatment conditions and found that similar to in vivo results, the microbial products from indole or probiotic treated mice produced increased AhR activation compared to untreated alcohol-fed mice. Likewise, microbial products isolated from mice treated with the AhR inhibitor exhibited impaired AhR activation (Fig. 8c).
Microbiota supplementation alters the intestinal microbial communities
We then assessed alpha and beta diversity of the intestinal microbiota following treatment. No significant differences in alpha diversity were seen among groups. However, beta diversity was significantly altered by alcohol-feeding, as well as by treatment with indole or with probiotics (Fig. 9a). Specifically, beta diversity was different between alcohol and pair-fed mice (q = 0.0101), alcohol and indole-treated mice (q = 0.0144), alcohol and indole + CH-223191-treated mice (q = 0.0060), alcohol and probiotic treated mice (q = 0.0577), as well as alcohol and heat-killed probiotic treated mice (q = 0.0006). No significant difference was seen between alcohol and probiotic + CH-223191-treated mice (q = 0.1204). We then determined the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that exhibited significantly differential abundance in the cecum at the genus and species levels using DESeq2 (Fig. 9b, c, respectively). Differentially abundant OTUs at the phylum and family levels are shown in Supplemental Fig. 5b, c, respectively. Importantly, Bifidobacterium animalis and Lactobacilus reuteri (two species present in the probiotic cocktail) were only detected in probiotic treated and the heat-killed probiotic groups (Supplemental Fig. 5a). Indicating that the probiotics are present in the GI tract of the treated mice. Finally, we evaluated the relationship between alpha diversity, beta diversity, and the number of the differentially abundant individual bacterial genera with Klebsiella lung burden. Using general liner model regression, we found that alpha diversity was not significantly associated with Klebsiella lung burden (P = 0.08936). Similarly, beta diversity was not associated with Klebsiella lung burden (P = 0.3724). However, beta diversity was associated with feeding and treatments (P = 0.0001). Using a negative binomial generalized linear model we found that 7 out of the 27 differentially abundant bacterial genera were associated with Klebsiella lung burden. Specifically, the genera A2 (q < 0.0001), Acetatifactor (q = 0.0001), Adlercreutzia (q < 0.0001), Bifidobacterium (q < 0.0001), and Harryflintia (q < 0.0001) were all negatively correlated with Klebsiella lung burden. While the genera Eisnebergiella (q < 0.0001), and Klebsiella (q = 0.0012) were positively correlated with Klebsiella lung burden.
We also performed PICRUSt2 analysis to assess the predicted functional capacity of the intestinal microbiota. We found that similar to beta diversity, inferred functional capacity was significantly altered by alcohol-feeding, as well as by treatment with indole, probiotics, or heat-killed probiotics, as determined by principle coordinate analysis based off of the inferred functional capacity (Supplemental Fig. 6a). We also evaluated the individual functional pathways of the intestinal microbiota, and found that 132 predicted pathways were significantly different between treatment groups (Supplementary Data 1). A heat-map showing the relative abundance of each predicated pathway in every animal is shown in Supplemental Fig. 5d. Representative functional pathways with significant differential abundance are shown for aromatic amino acid synthesis (Supplemental Fig. 6b), branch-chained amino acid synthesis (Supplemental Fig. 6c), and L-tryptophan synthesis (Supplemental Fig. 6d).
Microbiota supplementation mitigates alcohol-associated impairment of immune cell trafficking
We then sought to confirm alcohol-induced defects in immune cell trafficking, as the number of lung immune cells were decreased, while the number of intestinal immune cells were increased in alcohol-fed mice in these experiments, as well as our previously published work31. Immune cells were harvested from donor mice, labeled with CFSE and used for adoptive transfer into autologous recipients in each treatment group before infection (Fig. 10a). The levels of CFSE labeled immune cells were determined 48 h post-infection. Representative histograms are shown in Fig. 10b. We found that alcohol-fed animals had lower levels of CFSE+ immune cells in the lungs compared to pair-fed mice (Fig. 10c). Further, phenotypic analysis demonstrated that alcohol-fed animals had lower levels of pulmonary CFSE+ NK cells (Fig. 10d), and T-cells (Fig. 10e). However, not difference in levels of pulmonary CFSE+ neutrophils (Fig. 10f). Indole treatment, and to a lesser extent probiotics or heat-killed probiotics restored immune cell trafficking to the lungs in alcohol-fed mice (Fig. 10c). Importantly, AhR inhibition prevented the cellular trafficking effects induced by indole, and no effect of AhR inhibition was seen in probiotic treated animals. We then evaluated extra-pulmonary tissues for immune cell recruitment following adoptive transfer. Alcohol-fed mice had higher levels of CFSE+ cells in the intestinal track when compared to control mice (Supplemental Fig. 7a). However, the levels of CFSE+ cells in the liver were reduced compared to control mice (Supplemental Fig. 7b). No differences were seen in levels of CFSE+ cells in the spleen (Supplemental Fig. 7c). Similarly, Indole, probiotics or heat-killed probiotics reversed immune cell trafficking to the intestinal track and the liver in alcohol-fed mice (Supplemental Fig. 7a, b). AhR inhibition prevented the intestinal and liver cellular trafficking effects induced by indole, as well as in probiotic-treated animals. Representative CFSE histograms for each group and tissue is shown in Supplemental Fig. 8.
Discussion
A plethora of data has emerged demonstrating the importance of the intestinal microbiota for optimal host defense against bacterial and viral respiratory infections29–31,39–43. The dynamics of the intestinal microbiota-mediated regulation of the gut-lung axis has been led by work utilizing germ-free and antibiotics-treated mice. For example, germ-free mice, as well as antibiotic treated mice are highly susceptible to pulmonary infection with bacterial pathogens, such as K. pneumoniae and Streptococcus pneumoniae39,40. Importantly, restoration of the intestinal microbiota via fecal transplant augmented pulmonary host defense, demonstrating that an intact intestinal microbiota is required for optimal pulmonary host defense39,40.
Several mechanistic pathways have been identified to regulate the gut-lung axis. Brown et al.40 describe a pathway by which Nod-like receptor-stimulating bacteria in the upper airway and intestinal tract increase levels of interleukin-17A that in turn activates granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signaling, and stimulates pathogen killing and clearance by alveolar macrophages through extracellular signal regulated kinase signaling40. Fagundes et al.39 describe a pathway by which enhanced susceptibility to K. pneumoniae was associated with increased levels of IL-10, which suppresses neutrophil recruitment, and permitted pathogen growth and dissemination. In addition, the administration of LPS prior to pulmonary infection prevented pulmonary K. pneumoniae infection, reduced IL-10 secretion, normalized TNF-α and CXCL1 levels, as well as neutrophil recruitment to the lung39. Similarly, we have shown that alcohol-associated dysbiosis, independent of ethanol, increased susceptibility to Klebsiella pneumonia31. Alcohol-associated dysbiosis was likewise associated with lower immune cell numbers in the lungs, and increased intestinal permeability and inflammation31. These studies have several common themes by which the intestinal microbiota influences the pulmonary immune response: (1) regulation of cytokine/chemokine levels both locally (intestinal) and distally (lungs), (2) maintenance of the mobilization of immune cells to the site of infection, and (3) control of the basal activity of pattern recognition receptors.
Taken together, this suggests that the intestinal microbiota is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention for the prevention of dysbiosis-associated pulmonary infections. Most therapeutic approaches utilize probiotics and/or pre/postbiotics to target intestinal dysbiosis. Probiotics have been extensively studied for the treatment or alleviation of many disease, and there is a growing interest in understanding the effect of probiotics on lung disorders such as pneumonia. For example, Lactobacillus rhamnosus feeding decreased the burden of S. pneumoniae in the lung, prevented dissemination to the blood, and increased INF-γ, IL-6, IL-4, and IL-10 in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in wild-type mice44. Interestingly, only one of the two strain of L. rhamnosus tested provided a beneficial protective effect against pulmonary infection with S. pneumoniae44. Similarly, mice administrated Lactobacillus casei prior to pulmonary challenge with Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited increased pathogen clearance, phagocytic activity of alveolar macrophages, and IgA in BAL45. Similarly, Hori et al.46 observed parallel results in murine viral infection models, where feeding mice L. casei for 4 months prior to challenge reduced influenza viral titers in nasal washings, and increased natural killer (NK) activity and IFN-γ and TNF-α production46. We found marked reductions in the burden of K. pneumoniae in the lungs, reduced pulmonary and intestinal permeability, and improved immune response in the lungs of both innate (macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells) and adaptive immune cells (CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells) in alcohol-fed mice treated with a cocktail of probiotics prior to infection. Interestingly, heat-killed probiotics provided similar levels of protection to live organism. We also see that heat-killed probiotics increase pulmonary IL-22 levels to a greater extent than live probiotics, despite having similar levels of circulating indole. This could be due to several reasons; (1) heat killed probiotic may increase circulating levels of other AhR ligands, other than indole, to a much greater extent than the live probiotics, (2) transcription of the Il22 gene can also be induced by RORγt47, and (3) RORγt and AhR can act synergistically to promote IL-22 expression47. As such, it is possible that heat-killed probiotics increases RORγt and circulating levels of other AhR ligands leading to a more robust IL-22 response when compared to live probiotics. In similar studies oral feeding of heat-killed Lactobacillus bulgaricus was found to attenuate dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis48. Together, these data suggest that active production of specific bacterial metabolites may not be required, but that immune-mediated processing of these beneficial organisms is sufficient.
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are the most extensively studied bacterial metabolites with immunomodulatory consequences. There is a growing interest in the identification and characterization of specific bacterial metabolites/products with immunomodulatory properties. The catabolism of tryptophan by intestinal commensal organism is one such area of interest, as tryptophan catabolites (indoles) exhibited numerous immunomodulatory effects. Metabolic analyses of human fecal samples detected indole at concentrations of 250–1100 mM49,50, suggesting tryptophan biotransformation by intestinal microflora is beneficial for the host. Further, treatment of human intestinal epithelial cells with indole increases barrier function and attenuates inflammatory markers22. Additionally, catabolism of tryptophan by Lactobacilli hinders colonization of the intestinal tract by pathogenic Candida albicans through aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) dependent expression of IL-2226. Furthermore, indole, as well as indole-3-acetic acid reduce nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and alcohol-associated liver damage23,25. Finally, Tsay et al.51 showed that antibiotic treatment impaired lung immunity to P. aeruginosa by decreasing AhR expression in the intestine and peroxynitrite production by the alveolar macrophages (AMs). They also found that tryptophan or dead L. plantarum supplementation decreased P. aeruginosa bacterial counts in the lung through increased intestinal ROS production and NF-κB activation, leading to increased phagocytic activity of AMs51. We found that alcohol-fed mice treated with a indole prior to infection exhibited marked reductions in the burden of K. pneumoniae in the lungs, reduced pulmonary and intestinal permeability, and improved immune response in the lungs of both innate (macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells) and adaptive immune cells (CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells). Indole’s protective effects were also dependent on AhR signaling, as inhibition of AhR by CH-223191 mitigated indole’s immunomodulatory effects. Similarly, we found that indole treatment rescued immune cell trafficking to the lungs following K. pneumoniae infection. It is important to note that indole preferentially activates human AhR (EC50 ~ 3 μM) compared to murine AhR52. However, our results along with other published data26,51–53 shows that mouse AhR is activated by indole, but that TCDD is a much more potent activator of murine AhR. We and others hypothesis that TCDD causes a sustained and inappropriate activation of AhR, which leads to many detrimental effects such as clonal expansion of preneoplastic cells, or inhibition of apoptosis. In contrast, indole induces transient lower (than TCDD) activation of AhR, which we believe to be critical for maintaining normal cellular homeostasis. Clearly, additional research is needed to understand the balance between beneficial and detrimental effects of AhR signaling. Furthermore, research is needed to understand if the positive and negative effects of AhR signaling are either ligand and/or dose-dependent.
Taken together our results, along with the published literature, suggest that indole treatment restores: (1) intestinal barrier function; (2) cytokine/chemokine levels; (3) immune cell activation and programing; (4) immune cell recruitment to infected tissues; and (5) protection against bacterial pneumonia. These data also suggest that manipulation of tryptophan catabolism, AhR signaling, or IL-22 production during disease both locally (intestinal) or distally (lungs) should be further explored as novel therapeutic approaches for the prevention of alcohol-associated pneumonia. Interestingly, nearly every study to date that has utilize either probiotics and/or bacterial metabolites employs a prophylactic treatment approach for the mitigation or prevention of the disease of interest. However, as these therapies move into the clinical realm it will be important to understand if probiotics and/or metabolites can also be used as therapeutic interventions.
Treatment of alcohol-fed mice with the probiotic cocktail, heat-killed probiotics, or with indole lead to a reduction in pulmonary bacterial burden. Suggesting that alcohol-mediated changes to the intestinal microbiota is a critical mechanistic pathway by which alcohol impairs pulmonary host defense against bacterial pneumonia. However, there were specific effects on immune cell profiles, the intestinal microbial communities, as well as the involvement of AhR signaling unique to each treatment condition. For example, AhR inhibition leads to mitigation of every beneficial effect following indole treatment, suggesting that indole mainly acts as an AhR agonist. However, AhR inhibition does not mitigate all the beneficial effects of probiotics or heat-killed probiotics treatments. Specifically, AhR inhibition does not impair the trafficking of immune cells to the lung in response to pneumonia in animals that received probiotic supplementation. While AhR inhibition does blunt the effects of probiotics on bacterial burden, immune cell numbers, epithelial permeability, and gene expression there is often no statistical difference between probiotic treated mice and probiotic-treated mice given CH-223191, while AhR inhibition in indole-treated mice is always significantly different from indole treated alone. This strongly suggests that probiotics or heat-killed probiotics act via multiple pathways. However, the lack of an effects of probiotics on AhR signaling may also be due to several reasons. First, microbial tryptophan catabolites have been shown to have both agonistic and antagonistic effects against other microbial and environmental AhR ligands54. For example, indole-3-acetamide and indole-3-pyruvate exhibit dual effects on ligand-activated AhR. Each of the indole metabolites antagonize TCDD but potentiate the agonistic effects of BaP and FICZ54. Given this data, it is possible that probiotic treatments results in a shift in the production and/or amount of different indole metabolites, such that one metabolite acts as an AhR antagonistic in our model system. This may help to explain the intermediate effects of CH-223191 treatment that we observed in the probiotic treated mice. Finally, the kinetics of indole production and/or conversion may be different between probiotic-treated mice and indole-treated mice, as we only evaluated mice at one time point post infection. As such, it is possible that the probiotic-mediated effects on AhR signaling occur early then we examined. These data strongly support the need for a more complete understanding of the link between probiotics, indole, and AhR signaling in the context of host-defense against alcohol-associated pneumonia.
The results from this study demonstrate that intestinal microbiota targeted therapeutics may be used to mitigate the risk of alcohol‐associated bacterial pneumonia. Specifically, treatment with the specific microbial metabolite indole or with a probiotic cocktail may mitigated alcohol-associated increase in pathogen burden, restored pulmonary and intestinal immune responses, as well as pulmonary immune cell trafficking. Protective effects are, in part, mediated by AhR, as inhibition of AhR diminished the protective effects of indole. These findings suggest that alcohol either directly or through its metabolism, impairs the production/processing of microbial metabolites, specifically tryptophan catabolites, resulting in immune dysregulation and impaired cellular trafficking required for optimal host defense.
Methods
Mice
Female 10–12-week-old C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles Rivers Breeding Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and maintained in a temperature-controlled room for a week prior to experimental manipulation. Animals were kept in the animal care facility at LSUHSC throughout the experiment. Animals were handled under a laminar flow hood to maintain SPF conditions throughout the course of the experiment. All experiments were approved by the Institutional for Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at LSUHSC.
Alcohol feeding model
We utilized a binge-on-chronic alcohol feeding model31. Briefly, mice were acclimated to liquid diet for 5 days using Lieber-DeCarli ‘82 Shake and Pour (Bioserv, Flemington, NJ). Groups of mice (N = 5 per cage) were randomized into ethanol-fed, ethanol-fed plus treatment, or pair-fed groups. Pair-fed mice were maintained on control-liquid diet adjusted daily according to the consumption of ethanol-fed mice. Mice were administered 4 g kg−1 (31.5% vol/vol) ethanol by gavage following 5 and 10 days of alcohol-feeding. Pair-fed control mice were gavaged with 7 g kg−1 (45% wt/vol) maltose dextrin.
Treatments
All mice were treated by oral gavage daily thorough out the course of the experiments. Mice received indole by gavage (20 mg/kg/dose or ~200 μL of 17 mM indole; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) dissolved in sterile water warmed to 55 °C. All probiotics (Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus reuteri, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus) were obtained from DuPont™ Danisco® FloraFIT® probiotics as lyophilized powder at a known CFU/gram concentration. Each probiotic was weight and aliquoted into 1 × 108 CFU aliquots. Probiotics or heat-killed probiotics were resuspended in PBS and mice were gavaged with 5 × 108 CFU/dose. Probiotic cocktails were heat-killed by incubating at 100 °C for 15 min, bacterial viability was then confirmed by plating. No viable organisms were recovered from the heat-killed probiotics. Mice received CH-223191 by gavage (10 mg/kg/dose or ~200 µL of 3 mM CH-223191; Sigma Aldrich) dissolved in sterile corn oil. Alcohol-fed and pair-fed mice were gavage daily with vehicle (PBS). A separated cohort of control mice was given corn-oil or water daily to ensure no effects were seen with the different vehicles. No changes in host defense or bacterial burden were seen in control mice given corn-oil or water.
Klebsiella pneumoniae infection
Klebsiella pneumoniae infections and burden assessments were performed using standard methods31. Briefly, K. pneumoniae (strain 43816, serotype 2; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) was grown in 100 mL tryptic soy broth (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) in a shaking incubator (185 r.p.m.) at 37 °C for 18 h. Bacteria were then pelleted by centrifugation (2000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C), washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended in PBS at an estimated concentration of 1 × 103 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. Recipient mice were lightly anesthetized with isoflurane (1–4% to effect). Animals were suspended by their front incisors, the tongue was gently extended out with forceps, and 100 μL inoculum (1 × 102 CFU) was injected into the trachea using a P200 pipette. After inhalation of inoculum was observed, the tongue was released, and the animal was allowed to recover from anesthesia. All mice were sacrificed 48 h post-infection, and pulmonary and splenic burden was determined via serial dilution and plating onto HiCrome Klebsiella Selective Agar plates.
SPD-1 and IFABP ELISA
Serum was collected from all mice at sacrifice using BD serum separator tubes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Serum was then used for SPD-1 and IFABP ELISAs according to manufacturer’s specifications (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN).
Flow cytometry
Lungs and intestinal immune cells were collected for flow cytometry analysis31. Lung and intestinal tissue of each animal was minced, suspended in 10 mL homogenization buffer consisting of RPMI 1640 medium with 1 mg/mL Collagenase type 1 (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ) and 30 mg/mL DNase I (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), and incubated at 37 °C with shaking for 30 min. Cell suspensions were further disrupted by passing through a 70-mm nylon mesh. Intestinal lymphocytes were further purified by 44/67% Percoll gradient. RBCs were lysed using RBC lysis buffer (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) prior to staining. After washing with PBS, viable cells were counted on a hemocytometer using the trypan blue–exclusion method. One million viable cells were then used for staining. Both lung and intestinal immune cells were pretreated with TruStain FcX Anti-mouse CD16/32 antibody (2 μL per test, Cat #101320, BioLegend, San Diego, CA) and then stained with eFlour780 fixable viability dye (1 μL/mL, Cat #65-0865-14, Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) or FVS780 (1 μL/mL, Cat #565388, BD) followed by staining with antibodies specific for murine CD45 (0.25 μg per test, Cat #103104, BioLegend), CD3e (2.5 μg per test, Cat #100216, BioLegend), CD4 (1 μg per test, Cat #564667, BD), CD8a (1 μg per test, Cat #100748, BioLegend), GR1 (0.25 μg per test, Cat #108452, BioLegend), NK1.1 (2.5 μg per test, Cat #108720, BioLegend), CD11c (1 μg per test, Cat #117328, BioLegend), CD11b (0.4 μg per test, Cat #101263, BioLegend), F4/80 (0.5 μg per test, Cat #123149, BioLegend), CD45 (0.25 μg per test, Cat #565967, BD), CD3e (0.5 μg per test, Cat #749276, BD), AhR (0.5 μg per test, Cat #565790, BD), and IL-22 (0.125 μg per test, Cat #1H8PWSR, Thermo). Streptavidin Qdot 585 (10 nm per test, Cat #Q10111MP, ThermoFisher) was used in conjunction with biotin labeled antibodies. For all experiments, cells were acquired using an LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Cell numbers were determined using Precision Count Beads according to manufacturer’s instructions (Cat #424902, BioLegend).
DR-EcoScreen cells and AhR activation
DR-EcoScreen cells were obtained from Sekisui XenoTech via the JCRB Cell Bank at the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition. Ligand-dependent activation of AhR was determined using the mouse derived DR-EcoScreen cell line, as described previously38. Briefly, cells were trypsinized and suspended at a density of 1.0 × 105 cells/mL in a-MEM containing 5% of FBS. The cell suspension was seeded in a well of a 96-well white bottom plate at a final density of 50,000 cells/well (Nunc, Denmark). Various concentrations of chemicals (indole, TCDD, or CH-223191) that were dissolved in 1% DMSO was added to each well (final concentration of DMSO was 0.1%) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air under saturating humidity. Following 24 h of incubation, Steady-GloTM reagent was added to each well and the plate was shaken at room temperature for 5 min, the luminescence was then measured with a microplate-luminometer.
Quantitative RT-PCR
Intestinal and lung samples were harvested at sacrifice and placed directly into Allprotect Tissue Reagent (Qiagen). Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit on the QIAcube Connect (Qiagen). CYP1A1, AhR, and IL22 mRNA levels in the lungs and small intestine of treated mice treated was measured by real-time quantitative PCR, using QuantiTect SYBR® Green RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen), according to manufactures specifications. The following primer sequences were obtained from the PrimerBank database55,56: CYP1A1 (PrimerBank ID: B6753564a1), AhR (PrimerBank ID: 19526637a1), IL-22 (PrimerBank ID: 21426819a1), and GAPDH (PrimerBank ID: 6679939a1). The amounts of CYP1A1, AhR, and IL22 mRNA were normalized to that of GAPDH mRNA.
Immune cell isolation and CFSE
Spleen were harvested at sacrifice, resuspended in PBS, and homogenized using gentleMACS™ Octo Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Whole blood was collected using BD Microtainer® Blood Collection Tubes with K2EDTA (BD Biosciences). Splenic homogenates and whole blood were then combined and subjected to 1-Step Polymorphs density gradient centrifugation (Accurate Chemical, Westbury, NY). Both PBMCs and PMN buffy coats were harvested and combined. Immune cells were then stained using CellTrace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit according to manufacturer’s specifications (ThermoFisher). Viable cells were counted and ~1 × 107 immune cells were given to each recipient mouse via IP injection.
Liquid chromatographic and mass spectrometric conditions for indole quantitation
Mass spectrometric detection was performed on an LC-MS/MS 8060 system coupled with a Shimadzu Nexera UPLC system (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD). All chromatographic separations were performed with a Synergi Fusion-RP C18 column (4 u; 250 × 2.0 mm) equipped with a Phenomenex C18 guard column (Phenomenex, Torrance CA). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (mobile phase A) and methanol (mobile phase B) operated at total flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. The chromatographic separation was achieved using 12 min gradient elution with mobile phase composition changing from 50% B at 2 min to 85% B at 5 min. Ionization was carried out using atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) operated in positive mode. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was used for quantitation using precursor ion > product ion combinations of 118.15 > 91.1 m/z for indole, and 124.15 → 98.1 m/z for indole-d7 used as an internal standard (IS). The assay was linear over the range of 1–500 ng/mL. Indole was extracted from calibration standards, quality control, serum, lungs, and cecum samples by protein precipitation using acetonitrile.
DNA sequencing of the 16s rRNA gene
Sequencing was performed by the Louisiana State University School of Medicine Microbial Genomics Resource Group (http://metagenomics.lsuhsc.edu/mgrg)31,57. Briefly, cecal contents were flash frozen and genomic DNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp DNA StoolMini Kit (Qiagen Valencia, CA, USA) modified to include bead-beating. The 16S ribosomal DNA hypervariable regions V3 and V4 were amplified using gene-specific sequences, Illumina adapters, and molecular barcodes primers. Precisely, the V3 Forward: 5′- CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′ with a forward adapter (5′-AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC-3′), a forward pad: (TATGGTAATT), and a forward linker (GG), and the V4 Reverse: 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′ with a reverse adapter (5′-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT-3′), a reverse pad (AGTCAGTCAG), and a reverse linker (CC) were used for sequencing of cecal DNA samples. Samples were then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the 2 × 300 bp V3 sequencing kit. In addition, internal sequencing controls (negative water control and a positive mock community control) were included to test for contamination of the sequencing runs.
Sequence analysis
Raw sequence data was processed using R and the R packages: DADA2 v1.1.5, Phyloseq v1.16.2, DESeq2 v1.20.0, PICRUSt2 v2.2.0, STAMP v2.1.3, and vegan v2.3-558–64. Sequences were truncated, denoised, chimera-filtered, and clustered into sequence variants using DADA2. Operational taxonomic units (OTU) were generated in DADA2 by taxonomic classification of sequence variants using the SILVA reference database v132. The number of unique sequence variants in a sample (α-diversity) was calculated using the estimate_richness function in Phyloseq. Beta‐diversity analysis was performed using a distance‐based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) on sample‐wise Bray–Curtis dissimilarity distances using Phyloseq and vegan. Differentially abundant OTUs were determined via DESeq2. Inferred functional capacities were determined using PICRUSt2 and statistical significance was determined using STAMP. Graphics were generated using ggplot2 and STAMP.
Statistics and reproducibility
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (La Jolla, CA) and the R package vegan. Results are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean. A P < 0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) q‐value < 0.1, were deemed significant. Sample size and number of replicates is indicated in each respective figure legend. Statistical significance was assessed using a Mann–Whitney test for comparisons between two groups and a one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s multiple comparison test for comparisons between three or more groups. The statistical significance of the different microbiome measurements was assessed as follows. Alpha-diversity significance was inferred using Wilcoxon tests on vectors of data with corrections for multiple comparison via FDR. Beta‐diversity significance was inferred via permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices with corrections for multiple comparison via FDR. Assessment of the relationship between Klebsiella burden and alpha and beta diversity was done using a generalized linear model (GLM) and adonis2, respectively. Assessment of the relationship between Klebsiella burden and the differentially expressed bacterial genera was done using a negative binomial generalized linear model with corrections for multiple comparison via FDR. Model variables included Klebsiella burden, alpha or beta diversity, treatment group, and sequencing depth. Differentially abundant OTUs were determined using a negative binomial distribution model from DESeq2. Inferred functional capacities were determined using PICRUSt2 and statistical significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analysis with corrections for multiple comparison via FDR within the STAMP platform.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to especially thank Daryl J. Murry, Yashpal S. Chhonker and Vineet A. Joshi for their help with indole quantification via mass spectrometry. This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, which funds the Louisiana Clinical and Translational Science Center, Grant #U54‐GM104940, and by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grants #P60‐AA009803, #K99‐AA026336, #R21-AA027199, and #R00-AA026336. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author contributions
Conception: D.R.S. and D.A.W.; research design: D.R.S., M.G., J.E.S., P.E.M. and D.A.W.; investigation: D.R.S., M.G., C.M.T. and M.L.; data analysis: D.R.S., M.G., C.M.T. and M.L.; writing—draft and editing: D.R.S., M.G., J.E.S., P.E.M., C.M.T., M.L. and D.A.W.; and project administration: D.R.S.
Data availability
Sequencing data is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (BioProject ID: PRJNA602539). All additional data, including mass spectrometry-based indole quantification, which support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data 1).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Communications Biology thanks Zdenek Dvorak and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Sridhar Mani and Eve Rogers. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-021-02524-0.
References
- 1.Alcohol Facts and Statistics | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/alcohol-facts-and-statistics (2016).
- 2.Alcohol Use Disorder | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ (2016).
- 3.Happel KI, Nelson S. Alcohol, immunosuppression, and the lung. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2005;2:428–432. doi: 10.1513/pats.200507-065JS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jong GM, Hsiue TR, Chen CR, Chang HY, Chen CW. Rapidly fatal outcome of bacteremic Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia in alcoholics. Chest. 1995;107:214–217. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.1.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sisson JH. Alcohol and airways function in health and disease. Alcohol. 2007;41:293–307. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fuxench-Lopez Z, Ramirez-Ronda CH. Pharyngeal flora in ambulatory alcoholic patients: prevalence of gram-negative bacilli. Arch. Intern. Med. 1978;138:1815–1816. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1978.03630370033017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kolls JK, et al. Adenoviral-mediated interferon-gamma gene therapy augments pulmonary host defense of ethanol-treated rats. Alcoholism. 1998;22:157–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Geissler M, Gesien A, Wands JR. Inhibitory effects of chronic ethanol consumption on cellular immune responses to hepatitis C virus core protein are reversed by genetic immunizations augmented with cytokine-expressing plasmids. J. Immunol. 1997;159:5107–5113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Happel KI, et al. Acute alcohol intoxication suppresses the interleukin 23 response to Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. Alcoholism. 2006;30:1200–1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00144.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gamble L, Mason CM, Nelson S. The effects of alcohol on immunity and bacterial infection in the lung. Med. Mal. Infect. 2006;36:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nelson S, Kolls JK. Alcohol, host defence and society. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:205–209. doi: 10.1038/nri744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bode JC, Bode C, Heidelbach R, Durr HK, Martini GA. Jejunal microflora in patients with chronic alcohol abuse. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1984;31:30–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Casafont Morencos F, et al. Small bowel bacterial overgrowth in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1996;41:552–556. doi: 10.1007/BF02282340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Engen PA, Green SJ, Voigt RM, Forsyth CB, Keshavarzian A. The gastrointestinal microbiome: alcohol effects on the composition of intestinal microbiota. Alcohol Res. 2015;37:223–236. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hartmann P, et al. Deficiency of intestinal mucin-2 ameliorates experimental alcoholic liver disease in mice. Hepatology. 2013;58:108–119. doi: 10.1002/hep.26321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yan AW, et al. Enteric dysbiosis associated with a mouse model of alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53:96–105. doi: 10.1002/hep.24018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xie G, et al. Chronic ethanol consumption alters mammalian gastrointestinal content metabolites. J. Proteome Res. 2013;12:3297–3306. doi: 10.1021/pr400362z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen P, et al. Supplementation of saturated long-chain fatty acids maintains intestinal eubiosis and reduces ethanol-induced liver injury in mice. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:203–214. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ronis MJ, Korourian S, Zipperman M, Hakkak R, Badger TM. Dietary saturated fat reduces alcoholic hepatotoxicity in rats by altering fatty acid metabolism and membrane composition. J. Nutr. 2004;134:904–912. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.4.904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xie G, et al. Alteration of bile acid metabolism in the rat induced by chronic ethanol consumption. Faseb J. 2013;27:3583–3593. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-231860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chu H, Duan Y, Yang L, Schnabl B. Small metabolites, possible big changes: a microbiota-centered view of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2019;68:359–370. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bansal T, Alaniz RC, Wood TK, Jayaraman A. The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:228–233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906112107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hendrikx T, et al. Bacteria engineered to produce IL-22 in intestine induce expression of REG3G to reduce ethanol-induced liver disease in mice. Gut. 2019;68:1504–1515. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim WH, Lillehoj HS, Min W. Indole treatment alleviates intestinal tissue damage induced by chicken coccidiosis through activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:560. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Whitfield-Cargile CM, et al. The microbiota-derived metabolite indole decreases mucosal inflammation and injury in a murine model of NSAID enteropathy. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:246–261. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2016.1156827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zelante T, et al. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity. 2013;39:372–385. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ichinohe, T. et al. Microbiota regulates immune defense against respiratory tract influenza A virus infection. PNAS10.1073/pnas.1019378108 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Aldwell FE, et al. Oral delivery of lipid-encapsulated Mycobacterium bovis BCG extends survival of the bacillus in vivo and induces a long-term protective immune response against tuberculosis. Vaccine. 2006;24:2071–2078. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Doherty TM, Olsen AW, van Pinxteren L, Andersen P. Oral vaccination with subunit vaccines protects animals against aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:3111–3121. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.3111-3121.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.KuoLee R, Harris G, Conlan JW, Chen W. Oral immunization of mice with the live vaccine strain (LVS) of Francisella tularensis protects mice against respiratory challenge with virulent type A F. tularensis. Vaccine. 2007;25:3781–3791. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Samuelson DR, et al. Alcohol-associated intestinal dysbiosis impairs pulmonary host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006426. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Samuelson DR, et al. Intestinal microbial products from alcohol-fed mice contribute to intestinal permeability and peripheral immune activation. Alcoholism. 2019;43:2122–2133. doi: 10.1111/acer.14176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sin DD, Leung R, Gan WQ, Man SP. Circulating surfactant protein D as a potential lung-specific biomarker of health outcomes in COPD: a pilot study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2007;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-7-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kano H, et al. Prediction of reversibility of intestinal mucosal damage after ischemia-reperfusion injury by plasma intestinal fatty acid-binding protein levels in pigs. Perfusion. 2015;30:617–625. doi: 10.1177/0267659114566063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schurink M, et al. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein as a diagnostic marker for complicated and uncomplicated necrotizing enterocolitis: a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hammer AM, et al. Interleukin-22 prevents microbial dysbiosis and promotes intestinal barrier regeneration following acute injury. Shock. 2017;48:657–665. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hubbard TD, Murray IA, Perdew GH. Indole and tryptophan metabolism: endogenous and dietary routes to Ah receptor activation. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2015;43:1522–1535. doi: 10.1124/dmd.115.064246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Takeuchi S, Iida M, Yabushita H, Matsuda T, Kojima H. In vitro screening for aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonistic activity in 200 pesticides using a highly sensitive reporter cell line, DR-EcoScreen cells, and in vivo mouse liver cytochrome P450-1A induction by propanil, diuron and linuron. Chemosphere. 2008;74:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fagundes CT, et al. Transient TLR activation restores inflammatory response and ability to control pulmonary bacterial infection in germfree mice. J. Immunol. 2012;188:1411–1420. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brown RL, Sequeira RP, Clarke TB. The microbiota protects against respiratory infection via GM-CSF signaling. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1512. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01803-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ichinohe, T. et al. Microbiota regulates immune defense against respiratory tract influenza A virus infection. PNAS10.1073/pnas.1019378108 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Antunes KH, et al. Microbiota-derived acetate protects against respiratory syncytial virus infection through a GPR43-type 1 interferon response. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3273. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11152-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Samuelson DR, et al. Oral immunization of mice with live pneumocystis murina protects against pneumocystis pneumonia. J. Immunol. 2016;196:2655–2665. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Salva S, Villena J, Alvarez S. Immunomodulatory activity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from goat milk: impact on intestinal and respiratory infections. Int J. Food Microbiol. 2010;141:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Alvarez S, Herrero C, Bru E, Perdigon G. Effect of Lactobacillus casei and yogurt administration on prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in young mice. J. Food Prot. 2001;64:1768–1774. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-64.11.1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hori T, Kiyoshima J, Shida K, Yasui H. Effect of intranasal administration of Lactobacillus casei Shirota on influenza virus infection of upper respiratory tract in mice. Clin. Diagn. Lab Immunol. 2001;8:593–597. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.3.593-597.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kiss EA, Diefenbach A. Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in controlling maintenance and functional programs of RORgammat(+) innate lymphoid cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes. Front. Immunol. 2012;3:124. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Takamura T, et al. Lactobacillus bulgaricus OLL1181 activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway and inhibits colitis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2011;89:817–822. doi: 10.1038/icb.2010.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Karlin DA, Mastromarino AJ, Jones RD, Stroehlein JR, Lorentz O. Fecal skatole and indole and breath methane and hydrogen in patients with large bowel polyps or cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 1985;109:135–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00391888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zuccato E, et al. Role of bile acids and metabolic activity of colonic bacteria in increased risk of colon cancer after cholecystectomy. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1993;38:514–519. doi: 10.1007/BF01316508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tsay TB, Chen PH, Chen LW. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands enhance lung immunity through intestinal IKKbeta pathways. J. Transl. Med. 2019;17:304. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2043-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hubbard TD, et al. Adaptation of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor to sense microbiota-derived indoles. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12689. doi: 10.1038/srep12689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cheng Y, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity of tryptophan metabolites in young adult mouse colonocytes. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2015;43:1536–1543. doi: 10.1124/dmd.115.063677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vyhlidalova, B. et al. Gut microbial catabolites of tryptophan are ligands and agonists of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor: a detailed characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10.3390/ijms21072614 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Spandidos A, Wang X, Wang H, Seed B. PrimerBank: a resource of human and mouse PCR primer pairs for gene expression detection and quantification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D792–D799. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang X, Spandidos A, Wang H, Seed B. PrimerBank: a PCR primer database for quantitative gene expression analysis, 2012 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1144–D1149. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Samuelson DR, et al. The respiratory tract microbial biogeography in alcohol use disorder. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2018;314:L107–L117. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00277.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020;38:685–688. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Callahan BJ, et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3123–3124. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2020).
- 64.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Sequencing data is deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (BioProject ID: PRJNA602539). All additional data, including mass spectrometry-based indole quantification, which support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data 1).