Abstract
Restoring numbers and function of regulatory T cells (Tregs) is a novel therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative disorders. Whether Treg function is boosted by adoptive cell transfer, pharmaceuticals, or immune modulators, the final result is a robust anti-inflammatory and neuronal sparing response. Herein, a newly developed lipid nanoparticle (LNP) containing mRNA encoding granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Gm-csf mRNA) was developed to peripherally induce Tregs, used for treatment in preclinical Parkinson’s disease (PD) models. Administration of Gm-csf mRNA to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-treated mice and rats overexpressing alpha-synuclein produced dose-dependent increases in plasma GM-CSF levels and peripheral CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg populations. This upregulation paralleled nigrostriatal neuroprotection, upregulated immunosuppression-associated mRNAs that led to the detection of a treatment-induced CD4+ T cell population, and decreased reactive microgliosis. The current findings strengthen prior works utilizing immune modulation by harnessing Gm-csf mRNA to augment adaptive immune function by employing a new delivery platform to treat PD and potentially other neurodegenerative disorders.
Keywords: Regulatory T cells, Neuroprotection, GM-CSF, mRNA, Parkinson’s disease
Introduction
Phenotypic shift of T cell subsets is being developed for treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative disorders [1–7]. For PD, disease onset and progression are linked to reduced Treg numbers and anti-inflammatory function [8]. Whether pharmaceutical interventions serve to correct disease-linked immune deficits remains under active investigation [1, 9–13]. An overarching question remaining is how progressive nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration is affected by dysfunctional immunity. Neuroinflammation and aberrant adaptive immune responses are linked to changes in the brain microenvironment leading to disease onset and progression [11, 14–16]. Potent neuroinflammatory activities in PD are reflected through the presence of HLA-DR+ reactive microglia within the substantia nigra (SN), decreased mitochondrial function, increased proinflammatory IL1β, IL2, IL6, TNFα, IFN□, NOS, and ROS within the striatum, SN, peripheral blood and cerebral spinal fluids (CSF) [17–19]. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are detected in the proximity of dopaminergic neurons. This occurs in parallel with decreased levels of peripheral naïve T and effector lymphocytes, respectively. This along with decreased Treg function support a disease-associated adaptive immune dysregulation [19–21]. Moreover, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is altered as a consequence of neuroinflammation, affecting its leakiness and accelerating immunocyte (monocyte-macrophage and lymphocyte) penetrance. [16, 22]. Any transformation of an aberrant peripheral immune response could facilitate disease interdiction.
Recently, we, and others, have demonstrated that decreasing the brain’s inflammatory microenvironment through the induction of Treg can slow and/or attenuate neuronal loss [4, 7, 23, 24]. Specifically, CD4+ Tregs modulate neuroinflammation and lead to neuroprotective responses, whereas CD4+ Teffs increase the tempo of disease [4, 5]. In PD, diminished Treg numbers and function parallel disease severity [8]. In contrast, increasing Treg function and/or number leads to neuroprotective disease outcomes that translate into improvements in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III scores and clinical outcomes [4–8]. Thus, Treg induction has been promoted as a therapeutic strategy resting in its abilities to control neuroinflammation and prevent dopaminergic neuronal loss in PD [9, 24].
The search for pharmacological inducers of Treg led to the novel use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [6, 10]. Therein, we showed that GM-CSF increased Treg numbers and its immunoregulatory activities that led directly to dopaminergic neuronal protection in the substantia nigra and striatum [6]. The translational potential of GM-CSF (Leukine, sargramostim) was recently affirmed in a Phase I PD clinical trial [10]. GM-CSF administered for 2 months led to increased Treg numbers and function, and improved clinical motor activity. However, while daily treatment was generally well-tolerated, moderate adverse events were noted including injection site reactions, elevated white blood cell counts, and muscle and bone pain [10, 25–27]. Likewise, the limited bioavailability and short half-life of GM-CSF required high and frequent doses [27–29]. Thus, alternative strategies in formulations and GM-CSF delivery are required. Therefore, a unique lipid nanoparticle (LNP) containing Csf2 (Gm-csf mRNA) was developed as an alternative to direct administration of GM-CSF protein, providing the potential to decrease the amount and frequency of dose, while generating a similar neuroprotective profile. Here, we demonstrate an alternative drug delivery system leading to increased Treg numbers, cellular function, and potent neuroprotective activities in PD models of human disease following mRNA treatments. Cytokine profiling and transcriptomic analysis by single-cell RNA sequencing was utilized to confirm shifts in innate and adaptive immune populations following treatment. These findings warrant additional steps toward clinical translation of immune modulating mRNA treatment and have broad potential for a range of neurodegenerative diseases.
Materials and Methods
mRNA synthesis and formulation
Gm-csf mRNA, encoding either the Mus musculus or Rattus norvegicus precursor protein, was synthesized by in vitro transcription (IVT). A plasmid encoding the T7 RNA polymerase promotor followed by 5’ untranslated region (UTR), open reading frame (ORF), 3’UTR, and polyA tail was overexpressed in E. coli, linearized, and purified to homogeneity. The mRNA was synthesized by IVT using T7 RNA polymerase, where uridine triphosphate was substituted with N1-methyl-pseudouridine triphosphate [30]. Cap 1 was utilized to improve translation efficiency. After the transcription reaction, mRNAs were purified, buffer exchanged into sodium citrate buffer, and stored at −20 °C until use. Control mRNA NTFIX (nontranslated Factor IX) was synthesized by parallel methods. Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations were prepared by modifying a described method [31]. Formulation of mRNA was performed through ethanol injection nanoprecipitation by mixing acidified RNA and ionizable, fusogenic, structural, and PEG lipids dissolved in ethanol at a 3:1 ratio (aqueous:ethanol). After pH adjustment, the mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles were buffer exchanged into PBS (pH 7.4), transferred to vials, and stored refrigerated at 5 °C or frozen at −20 °C until further use. A release panel of analytical characterization assays were performed, which included particle size and polydispersity, encapsulation, and endotoxin content before the material was deemed acceptable for in vivo study. mRNA and LNP used in this study exhibit >6 months of stability under frozen conditions and are retested bi-annually to extended shelf-life. Final particle size and encapsulation were <100 nm and >80%, respectively, with endotoxin below 10 EU/mL.
Animals, mRNA treatment, MPTP intoxication, and alpha-synuclein overexpression
Animals were housed, maintained and used for experiments following guidelines set forth by the National Institutes of Health Institutional Review Board and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. For mouse studies, C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (stock # 000664). After acclimation, mice were injected intramuscularly with a LNP containing Mus musculus Gm-csf mRNA (Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA) (Gm-csf mRNA). For dose response studies, mice were injected daily for 4 consecutive days at doses ranging from 0.00001 mg/kg to 0.1 mg/kg LNP-Gm-csf mRNA or 0.1 mg/kg LNP-NTFIX. For neuroprotection experiments, mice were injected with either vehicle (DPBS, 10 ml/kg body weight) or MPTP reconstituted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO. Mice received 4 subcutaneous injections of MPTP-HCl (16 mg free base/kg), each administered at 2-hour intervals. MPTP safety precautions were followed in accordance with determined safety and handling protocol [32]. On days two and seven after MPTP intoxication, mice were sacrificed and brains were harvested for neuroinflammation evaluations (day 2) and neuronal survival (day 7), respectively (Supplemental Figure 1). For rat studies, 7-week old male Sprague-Dawley (SASCO) rats were ordered from Charles River Laboratories. Rats were injected intramuscularly with lipid nanoparticles containing Rattus norvegicus Gm-csf mRNA (Gm-csf mRNA) (Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA). For naïve rat studies, animals were injected for 4 consecutive days with either 0.01 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA and sacrificed on day 5. For human alpha-synuclein (α-Syn) overexpression studies, rats were injected for 4 consecutive days immediately following stereotactic injection, followed by injections every other day until sacrifice. On day 28, rats were sacrificed, and spleens and brains were harvested (Supplemental Figure 1).
Stereotactic Injection
Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane in O2 and placed in a stereotaxic device (Leica Biosystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL) to secure their skulls. Following skull exposure and formation of a 1–2 mm hole, a sterile Hamilton syringe (model 8100, Thermo Fisher) attached to a 26-gauge needle was inserted into the brain. Vectors were delivered via syringe pump. For α-Syn overexpression, AAV2/1-CBA-HuαSyn-IRES-eGFP-WPRE (Standaert-5713) vector (AAV-α-Syn) and control AAV2/1-IRES-eGFP-WPRE (Standaert-5712) vector (AAV-GFP) were obtained from the University of Iowa (Vector Core, Iowa City, IA) with kind permission from Dr. David G. Standaert (Department of Neurology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, AL) [33, 34]. In 3 □ of PBS, 3×109 genomic copies of AAV-vectors were delivered to the left hemisphere above the substantia nigra at the following coordinates relative to the bregma: AP,−5.3 mm; ML, −2.0 mm; DV, −7.5mm DV.
Perfusions and immunohistochemistry
Under terminal anesthesia (Fatal Plus, pentobarbital), mice and rats were perfused via cardiac puncture with DPBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Sigma-Aldrich) in DPBS. Whole brains from mice 7 days post MPTP or from rats 28 days post AAV stereotactic injection were harvested after perfusion to assess survival of dopaminergic neuron cell bodies in the substantia nigra (SN) and termini in the striatum. Frozen midbrains were sectioned at 30 μm and were immunostained for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (anti-TH, 1:2000, EMD Millipore) and counterstained for Nissl substance [35]. To assess microglial reactivity, brains were harvested 2 days after MPTP (mice) or 28 days after stereotactic injection of AAV (rats) and midbrain sections (30 μm) were immunostained for Mac-1 (anti-CD11b, 1:1000, AbD Serotech) for mice and Iba-1 (1:1000, VWR) for rat. To assess dopaminergic termini, striatal sections (30 μm) were labeled with anti-TH (1:1000, EMD Millipore). To visualize antibody-labeled tissues, sections were incubated in streptavidin-HRP solution (ABC Elite Vector Kit, Vector Laboratories) and color was developed using an H2O2 generation system in the presence of diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen (Sigma-Aldrich). Estimated neuron and reactive microglial numbers were quantified by a blinded investigator and unbiased stereological analysis using StereoInvestigator software (MBF Bioscience) [35]. Density of dopaminergic neuron termini in the striatum was determined by digital densitometry using Image J software (National Institutes of Health).
Regulatory T Cell Suppression Assays
For mouse studies, CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- cells were isolated from spleen using EasySep Mouse CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Isolation Kit II (StemCell) per the manufacturer’s instructions. For rat studies, the same cell populations were isolated using EasySep Rat CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit (StemCell). Isolated rat CD4+ cells were stained with anti-CD25 PE (BD Bioscience) for 20 minutes at a concentration of 0.75 μg/ml per 1.5 × 107 cells. Anti-PE-magnetic beads from EasySep PE Positive Selection Kit II (StemCell) were then added for the positive magnetic separation of CD4+CD25+ T cells. Isolated cell populations from mouse and rat were assessed for purity by flow cytometric analysis and were determined to be > 90% CD4+CD25+ and >60% CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ as determined by the expression of intracellular FOXP3. The CD4+CD25- T cell fraction was collected from the PBS-treated group (0 mg/kg) in both rats and mice and served as the Tresponder (Tresp) population for the suppression assay. Isolated Tresps were labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) (Thermo Fisher) in order to track cell proliferation. Tregs were serially diluted by 2-fold into wells of a 96-well U bottom microtiter plate and CFSE-stained Tresps were plated at a concentration of 50 × 106 cells/ml to yield Treg:Tresp ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 0.5:1, 0.25:1, and 0.125:1. Mouse cells were stimulated for proliferation using Dynabeads T-activator CD3/CD28 beads (ThermoFisher) at a 1:1 bead:cell ratio. For rat cell stimulation, Dynabeads M-450 epoxy (ThermoFisher) were conjugated using anti-rat CD3 and anti-rat CD28 according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting CD3:CD28 ratio was 1:1 and the resulting bead:antibody ratio was 1000 beads:200 μg (100 μg of each antibody). After conjugation, beads were stored at 4°C at a concentration of 4 × 107 beads/ml in PBS, pH 7.4 with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Stimulated Tresps alone and unstimulated Tresps were plated as controls. Suppression assay cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3 days, fixed, and analyzed on a BD LSRII flow cytometer. The extent of proliferation using CFSE fluorescence was assessed utilizing FACSDiva Software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Treg-mediated inhibition was calculated as % Inhibition = 1 – (% Proliferating Tresp:Treg ÷ % Proliferating Stimulated Tresp Alone).
Adoptive Transfer
From donor mice treated with Gm-csf mRNA, splenic CD4+CD25+ cells were isolated using the same kits as described in the suppression assay. Recipient mice were intoxicated with MPTP as described and 1 × 106 CD4+CD25+ cells were adoptively transferred via tail vein injection 8 to 12 hours post-MPTP treatment. On days 2 or 7 following administration of MPTP, mice were sacrificed, and brains were harvested and processed (Supplemental Figure 1).
Flow Cytometric Assessments
After 4 days of Gm-csf mRNA treatment, whole blood and spleens of rats and mice were collected to determine T cell and B cell profiles via flow cytometric analysis. Whole blood (50 μl) and splenocytes (1 × 106) were fluorescently labeled using antibodies against surface markers for CD3, CD4, CD25, CD8, and the intracellular marker for FOXP3. Mouse blood and splenocytes were labeled with PerCP-Cy5.5-anti-CD3 (eBioscience), PE-Cy7-anti-CD4 (eBioscience), PE-anti-CD25 (eBioscience) and FITC-anti-CD8 (eBioscience). Rat blood was stained with BV-421-anti-CD3 (BD Bioscience), PerCP-eFluor710-anti-CD4 (eBioscience), BV-786-anti-CD8 (BD Bioscience), and PE-anti-CD25 (BD Bioscience). For intracellular staining of both rat and mouse cells, cells were permeabilized for 45 min at 4°C using FOXP3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience). Cells were then labeled with APC-anti-FOXP3 (eBioscience) followed by fixation. Samples were processed on a BD LSRII flow cytometer and analyzed using FACSDiva Software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cell frequencies were determined from the total lymphocyte population. For myeloid population immunophenotyping, mouse spleens were collected and fluorescently labeled using the following antibodies: Pacific-blue-anti-CD11b (Biolegend), Alexa-fluor-700-anti-CD11c (Biolegend), PerCP-anti-I-A/I-E (Biolegend), PE-anti-CD86 (Biolegend), PE-Cy7-anti-CD86 (Biolegend), anti-CD-80 (abcam, ab134120) and FITC-anti-CD40 (Biolegend). Data were acquired on a flow cytometer (LSRFortessa™, FACSCantoII, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed with FlowJo® (FlowJo, LLC, Ashland, Oregon).
Blood Chemistry and Peripheral Blood Assessments
At the time of sacrifice, 250 μl of whole blood was collected into K2EDTA blood collection tubes for complete blood count (CBC) levels or into heparinized blood collection tubes for blood chemistry and metabolite levels. Following isolation, heparinized blood was centrifuged, and plasma was collected. Complete metabolic panels were carried out using VetScan Chemistry Comprehensive Test cartridges (Abaxis) on a VetScan VS2 machine. For CBC analysis, whole blood collected from K2EDTA tubes was immediately assayed on a VetScan HM5 machine.
GM-CSF Protein Quantification
Prior to treatment, peripheral blood from mice was collected via maxillary bleed. Mice were then treated with Gm-csf mRNA, and after 6 hours, mice were bled again. Plasma was collected by centrifuging whole blood at 10,600 x g for 10 minutes and stored at −80°C. After 4 days of Gm-csf mRNA treatment, mice were sacrificed and the spleen, liver, brain, and inguinal lymph nodes were harvested. These were flash frozen. Five mg of tissue was lysed with NP40 (Cell Lysis Buffer, Invitrogen) containing an EDTA-free protease inhibitor (Sigma Aldrich). Samples were sonicated, centrifuged then aliquoted. Following collection and storage, a Pierce BCA Protein Assay (ThermoFisher) was performed to determine total protein concentration. GM-CSF protein levels were then determined using Mouse GM-CSF Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems) using the manufacturer’s protocol.
Cytokine Assessments
Before α-Syn overexpression and Gm-csf mRNA treatment, rats were bled via maxillary vein, and peripheral blood was collected as a baseline. After collection, blood was centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 minutes, and plasma was collected and stored at −80°C. After 28 days, at the time of sacrifice, blood and plasma were collected again. After collection, levels of cytokines within plasma before and after treatment were assessed using Rat Cytokine Array Panel A (R&D Systems) protocol.
Single-cell RNA sequencing and data analysis
Five days post-treatment with either PBS or 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA, spleens were harvested and CD4+ cells were enriched by negative selection using the EasySep Mouse CD4+ T Cell Isolation (StemCell) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Enriched samples were then prepared and sequenced in the UNMC Genomics Core Facility. Briefly stated, cell suspensions were evaluated by light microscopy to determine concentration, percent viability, and assess potential debris present in the suspension. Cells were loaded onto a 10x Genomics instrument and single cells were captured, lysed, RNA reverse transcribed, and RNA barcoded using Chromium Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kits v3 reagents following the manufacturers’ suggested protocol (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA). Illumina compatible cDNA libraries were created and quantified by qPCR using the KAPA Library Quant Kit (Illumina) from KAPA Biosystems (Roche, Pleasonton, CA). Samples were sequenced to an average depth of approximately 54,000 mean reads per cell on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 instrument. Approximately 7,500 (Gm-csf mRNA) and 7,900 (PBS) cells per sample were subjected to the analysis. FASTQ basecall files were provided to the UNMC Bioinformatics and Systems Biology for further analysis. Cellranger (v.5.0.1) mkfasq was applied to the basecall files to generate sequencing and 10x-specific quality control metrics, including barcode quality, accuracy, and diversity. FASTQ files were generated and inserted into the Cellranger count pipeline to perform alignment using STAR aligner with MM10 reference genome, filtering, and UMI (Unique molecular identifier) counting. Chromium cellular barcodes were used to generate gene-barcode matrices and perform clustering and gene expression analysis. Gene expression values were then normalized to a reference genome, scaled, and log transformed. Clustering methods were determined as K-means using an unsupervised graph-based method. Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was utilized to change the dimensionality of the dataset to a user-selectable number of principal components, followed by t-SNE (t-Stochastic Neighbor Embedding) to visualize the data in two-dimensional space. Cellranger aggregation was performed to normalize and pool the results for treatment-based comparisons. Following intital aggregation and cluster analysis, CD3 and CD4 co-expression levels were assessed on all cell populations. Clusters were then filtered to include only UMIs from CD4+CD3+ subsets due to the mixed starting population, thus allowing for analysis of only CD4+ T cells.
Statistical Analyses
For all studies, data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (La Jolla, CA). All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences in between-group means were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey or Newman-Keuls post hoc test, depending on assay. Significant difference for all studies was selected at P < 0.05. Measurement of Treg function and dose-dependency were assessed by linear regression analyses as either a function of Treg:Tresp ratio or Gm-csf mRNA dose. Differences in Treg suppressive function were determined by differences between groups in slope or intercept. Slopes for all lines were determined to be significantly non-zero. For single-cell RNA sequencing, cluster analysis was determined using statistical significance of the expression difference and was based on a negative binomial test. P-values were adjusted for multiple testing via the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
Results
Gm-csf mRNA induces detectable GM-CSF protein in plasma within six hours after intramuscular injection of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA (Figure 1A). Treatment with 0.01 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA significantly increased plasma GM-CSF levels from 188 pg/ml to 1487 pg/ml, treatment with 0.05 mg/kg significantly increased levels from 73 pg/ml to 6215 pg/ml, and treatment with 0.1 mg/kg significantly increased levels from 12 pg/ml to 8211 pg/ml. However, elevated GM-CSF protein levels were not detected in plasma of mice treated with 0.001 mg/kg or lower doses of Gm-csf mRNA or those treated with a non-translatable mRNA negative control (NTFIX). Variation in endogenous GM-CSF levels were recorded among the groups. Normative serum values for mice generally average 40 pg/ml with ranges of 8–128 pg/ml for mice [36]. However, in this instance, some endogenous readings fell slightly higher than normal. This may reflect assay variability, animal to animal variations or lower doses administered in replicate study experiments. GM-CSF protein was not significantly increased in spleen, liver, brain, or inguinal lymph nodes of mice treated with Gm-csf mRNA (< 71 pg/ml GM-CSF) compared to tissues isolated from untreated animals (10–50 pg/ml GM-CSF) (data not shown). Treatment with ascending doses of Gm-csf mRNA resulted in significant enlargement in spleen size that was found to be dose-dependent by linear regression analysis (R2 = 0.46, P = 0.0009) (Figure 1B and C). Along with increased spleen size, parallel increases in peripheral white blood cells (WBC) were observed (Figure 1D-G). Absolute blood cell counts revealed an increasing trend in WBC (Figure 1D), monocytes (Figure 1E) and neutrophils (Figure 1F) that coincided with increasing doses of Gm-csf mRNA but were only significantly increased with 0.1 mg/kg dose. However, lymphocyte populations were only slightly affected (Figure 1G). Overall, comprehensive metabolic panels were not majorly altered by treatment as levels of creatinine, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, glucose, urea nitrogen, sodium, calcium, globulin, and phosphorus were unchanged by treatment, whereas alkaline phosphatase (Figure 1H), albumin (Figure 1I), and amylase (Figure 1J) decreased in 0.01 and/or 0.1 mg/kg-treated animals. NFTIX treatment did not significantly differ from PBS (0 mg/kg) in any assessments.
Gm-csf mRNA increases Treg and myeloid populations leading to neuroprotection in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-
Next, T cell phenotypes within peripheral blood were assessed via flow cytometric analysis (Figure 2A). Treatment of mice with 4 consecutive daily doses of LNP-formulated Gm-csf mRNA ranging from 0.001 mg/kg to 0.01 mg/kg showed no significant change in T cell frequencies within peripheral blood (Figure 2B-D). However, 0.1 mg/kg treatment significantly reduced CD3+, CD8+, and CD4+ T cell frequencies from those observed in untreated animals. In contrast, 0.1 mg/kg treatment significantly increased CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ cell frequencies from 3.5 ± 0.49 to 14.3 ± 0.99% compared to untreated controls (Figure 2E). Treatment at 0.001 and 0.01 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA also increased CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ cell frequencies to 8.2 ± 1.6 and 9.2 ± 2.0 %, but the elevation was not significant. NTFIX treatment had no effect on T cell subsets. Additionally, splenic Tregs isolated from Gm-csf mRNA-treated animals suppressed the proliferation of CD3/CD28-stimulated, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled CD4+CD25- T responder cells (Tresps) (Figure 2F-H) A representative flow cytometric readout of Treg-induced inhibition of Tresp proliferation demonstrates loss of inhibitory function with dilution of Tregs (Figure 2F). The percent of proliferating Tresp in co-culture with Tregs was determined (Figure 2G) and the resulting Treg inhibitory capacity was calculated (Figure 2G and 2H) [8, 37]. Significant elevations in slope indicate greater inhibitory capacity at higher Tresp:Treg ratios. Determination of elevation using linear regression analysis indicated significantly enhanced suppressive capacity of Tregs isolated from mice treated with Gm-csf mRNA at 0.01 mg/kg (p = 0.007) or 0.1 mg/kg (p = 0.04) compared to CD4+CD25+ Tregs from PBS-treated controls.
In addition to the changes in Treg frequency described above, significantly increased frequency of splenic CD11c+MHCII+ classical dendritic cells (cDC) were found in mice treated with Gm-csf mRNA dosed at 0.001–0.1 mg/kg (Figure 3A and 3B). However, only the 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA treatment group displayed significant expansion of CD11b+Cd11c- myeloid population (Figure 3C). To determine whether LNP-formulated Gm-csf mRNA alters maturation status of the expanded CD11c+ dendritic cell (DC) population, expression of maturation markers such as CD80, CD86, CD40 and Class II (IA-IE) were evaluated by flow cytometry by determining Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI). Increased expression of CD86 per cell, as indicated by increased CD86 MFI, was observed in the 0.01 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA treated group compared to PBS controls; while an increased CD80 MFI is observed in both treatment groups when compared to the PBS control (Figure 3D). MFI of class II was significantly reduced upon treatment with 0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA.
Following flow cytometric evaluation and confirmation of Treg induction and myeloid expansion, mice were treated for 4 days with Gm-csf mRNA followed by MPTP intoxication to determine its effect on neuroprotective activities. After MPTP intoxication, the total number of surviving nigral dopaminergic (TH+/Nissl+) neuronal cell bodies was assessed along with their striatal projections (Figure 4A). Numbers of surviving dopaminergic neurons were significantly decreased from 10771 ± 356 to 4893 ± 489 when treated with MPTP compared to PBS controls (Figure 4B). As expected, NTFIX treatment did not lead to neuronal sparing. However, treatment with increasing doses of Gm-csf mRNA resulted in a 21% (7162 ± 327), 34% (8576 ± 494), and 36% (8758 ± 291) increase in dopaminergic neurons compared to MPTP alone. All Gm-csf mRNA doses yielded significantly higher TH+ neuronal counts than MPTP intoxication alone. Of note, treatment with 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA was not significantly different from non-lesioned controls, supporting the potent neuroprotective potential of Gm-csf mRNA. As expected, numbers of non-dopaminergic (TH-/Nissl+) neurons remained unchanged regardless of treatment due to their lack of MPTP susceptibility [32, 38]. However, although striatal termini TH density was increased with Gm-csf mRNA treatment over MPTP, none were significantly higher, indicating increased termini susceptibility to MPTP intoxication (Figure 4C).
Next, changes in the MPTP-induced inflammatory response were investigated. Two days after MPTP administration, a time of peak inflammation and rate of neuronal death, brains were harvested to assess reactive microglia as determined by Mac-1 expression and amoeboid morphology (Figure 4D) [39]. MPTP increased numbers of reactive microglia, elevating counts from 0 cells/mm2 for PBS control mice to 104 ± 5 cells/mm2 after MPTP intoxication (Figure 4E). NTFIX treatment resulted in a similar inflammatory response to MPTP alone, yielding 126 ± 8 cells/mm2, indicating its lack of protective capacity. Treatment with ascending doses of Gm-csf mRNA (0.001 mg/kg to 0.1 mg/kg) decreased reactive microglial counts to 85 ± 4, 92 ± 5, and 85 ± 10 cells/mm2, respectively. However, only treatment with 0.001 and 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA resulted in a statistically significant attenuation of microglial responses.
We next sought to determine potential mechanisms for neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory profiles afforded by Gm-csf mRNA treatment. To do so, CD4+CD25+ T cells from the spleens of Gm-csf mRNA-treated donors were isolated and adoptively transferred into MPTP-intoxicated recipient mice (Figure 5). Previously isolated CD4+CD25+ T cells demonstrated high levels of FOXP3 intracellular staining affirming their Treg phenotype and immunosuppressive activities [6, 40]. After seven days post-transfer, ventral midbrains and striatum were assessed for TH+ dopaminergic neuron survival (Figure 5A). MPTP intoxication significantly reduced neuron numbers from 7065 ± 878 for PBS controls to 4042 ± 547 (Figure 5B). Although not significant, adoptive transfer of CD4+CD25+ cells from mice treated with 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA increased TH+/Nissl+ neuron survival to 6098 ± 1115 compared to MPTP intoxication alone. However, CD4+CD25+ cells isolated from 0.01 mg/kg-treated mice did not enhance the level of neuronal survival above the MPTP lesion. Likewise, densitometric analysis of striatal termini was not altered after adoptive transfers (Figure 5C).
Gm-csf mRNA treatment induces a treatment-specific immunosuppressive Treg population.
Next, to assess the ability of Gm-csf mRNA to not only enhance Treg frequency and function but alter the transcriptomic phenotype of the overall CD4+ T cell population, animals were treated with either PBS or 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA. CD4+ T cells were isolated and analyzed for distinct transcriptomic profiles using single-cell RNA sequencing (Figure 6). A mean of 1693 genes per cell for PBS-treated mice and 1871 genes per cell for Gm-csf mRNA-treated mice were detected. A total of 53,000 reads per cell in approximately 7,500 cells from both PBS- and Gm-csf mRNA-treated samples were quantified. Samples were pooled for initial unsupervised cluster analysis to allow for the identification of potentially novel cell populations and/or phenotypes resulting from Gm-csf mRNA treatment. Clusters were then mapped and filtered to display only CD3+CD4+ cell subsets (Figure 6A). Initially, using UMI differential expression patterns and unbiased cluster mapping, PBS- and Gm-csf mRNA-treatments resulted in similar cell clustering profiles within the overall sample. Five clusters representing distinct transcriptional T cell phenotypes were displayed. Using expression levels of known cell surface markers, transcription factors, and cytokine production markers, cluster phenotypes were identified (Supplemental Figure 2). Clusters 1, 2, and 4 were identified as largely CD44-CD62L+ naïve T cell (Tn) populations. Cluster 4 also exhibited a non-significant increase in Th9 transcript expression. Cluster 3 displayed a Treg, Th2, and Th22 phenotype, and Cluster 5 exhibited markers known to be associated with Th1 and Th17 subsets. All clusters were observed in both PBS- and Gm-csf mRNA-treated samples. However, aggregation analysis identified a cluster of T cells more specific to Gm-csf mRNA treatment compared to PBS treatment alone (Figure 6B), and corresponded to Cluster 3 (Figure 6A). This cluster exhibited over 50 key genes with significantly higher expression levels that includes gene encoding for Il2ra, Foxp3, Ccr4, Il10, Ctla4, Nrp1, Nrn1, Cd83, Lrrc32, Lag3, Ikzf2, Il9r, Areg, Il1rl1, Zbtb32, Hopx, s100a4, s100a6, and s100a10 (Figure 6C), thus suggesting the induction of an anti-inflammatory phenotype by treatment with Gm-csf mRNA.
Gm-csf mRNA treatment leads to neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory responses in an alpha-synuclein (α-Syn) rat PD model.
To confirm our prior observations in a second species and more chronic and progressive disease model, we assessed the effect of LNP-formulated rat Gm-csf mRNA in rats. Initially, naïve rats were treated for 4 days with rat Gm-csf mRNA at a dose of 0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg. Both mRNA doses resulted in the same spleen enlargement observed in mice (Figure 7A). Flow cytometric analysis of T cell populations within total lymphocytes in peripheral blood indicated no change in CD3 percentage with any treatment (Figure 7B), a significant decrease in CD4 percentage with 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA treatment (Figure 7C), and a significant increase in CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Treg percentages with both mRNA doses (Figure 7D). Treg frequencies within the CD4+ population were increased from 4.1 ± 0.26 % in control rats to 12 ± 1.5% in 0.01 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA-treated rats, and 20 ± 2.4 % in 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA-treated rats, mimicking the observations in mice. CD4+CD25+ Tregs enriched from each treatment group were assessed for changes in their suppressive ability to inhibit proliferation of CD4+CD25- Tresps (Figure 7E-F). Treatment with both dosages of Gm-csf mRNA resulted in enhanced suppressive function compared to controls (R2 ≥ 0.87, P < 0.01).
Due to the ability of rat Gm-csf mRNA treatment to selectively increase Treg frequency and function in healthy naive animals, we next assessed the effects of Gm-csf mRNA in a Parkinsonian model utilizing human α-Syn overexpression. Rats were administered a unilateral stereotactic injection of PBS (Sham), AAV-GFP (Vector control), or AAV-α-Syn, followed by Gm-csf mRNA administered i.m. the first 4 days and then every other day thereafter. After 28 days, T cell levels were assessed in peripheral blood (Figure 7G-J). Levels of CD3+ cells were significantly decreased from pretreatment baseline in animals receiving AAV-α-Syn + 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA but were not significantly altered by other treatments (Figure 7G). Levels of CD8+ and CD4+ cells were also not significantly affected by any treatment; however, a mild decreasing trend was observed with mRNA treatment (Figure 7H and 7I). Recapitulating observations in mice, Gm-csf mRNA treatment increased CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Treg frequencies within the CD4+ population of peripheral blood (Figure 7J). Treatment with 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA in α-Syn overexpressing animals significantly increased Treg frequencies from 2.5 to 4.0 and 7.4%, respectively.
We also assessed the neuroprotective capacity of Gm-csf mRNA in □-syn overexpressing rats. AAV-α-Syn injection led to a remarkable diminution of dopaminergic neurons as determined by loss of TH expression compared to Sham- or AAV-GFP-treated animals (Figure 8A). Overexpression of α-Syn markedly reduced TH+ neuron counts by 49.3%. However, treatment with Gm-csf mRNA rescued the neuronal loss by sparing 57% of the neurons (28.2% and 28.8% losses) regardless of dose, thus demonstrating their neuroprotective potential (Figure 8B). Similarly, treatment with 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg of Gm-csf mRNA also increased dopaminergic termini survival, resulting in a 13.7% and 27.9% level of protection, respectively compared to AAV-α-Syn + PBS treatment (Figure 9C). We also assessed levels of reactive microglia as Iba-1+ amoeboid microglia within the substantia nigra (Figure 8D). Administration of control AAV-vector did not elevate reactive microglial ratios over Sham injection, whereas overexpression of α-Syn increased reactive microglia by 3-fold (Figure 8E). Treatment with 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg of Gm-csf mRNA attenuated the α-Syn-associated microglial response with fold ratios diminished to 1.96 ± 0.22 and 2.28 ± 0.09, respectively.
Along with microglial responses, cytokine protein levels within plasma were also assessed following 28 days of AAV-α-Syn overexpression to determine changes in the inflammatory response associated with disease (Figure 8F-I). Treatment with 0.01 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA resulted in decreases in CINC-1, CINC-2αβ, CINC-3, CNTF, IP-10, LIX, IL-1ra, IL-2, and TNFα (p = 0.09). Treatment with 0.1 mg/kg Gm-csf mRNA resulted in decreased CINC-1, CINC-2αβ, CINC-3, CNTF, IP-10, LIX, MIP-1α, RANTES, IL-1α, IL-1ra, IL-2, and TNFα relative to levels observed in AAV-α-Syn overexpression alone. Proteins found to be increased in both treatment doses were CXCL7, TIMP-1, IFNγ, and IL-10. However, given these observations, only levels of LIX were significantly downregulated from AAV-α-Syn overexpression alone.
Discussion and Conclusions
GM-CSF protein treatment is neuroprotective in neurodegenerative disorders [3, 41–44]. This occurs, in part, by induction of Tregs leading to profound control of innate microglial immune responses. The balance between phenotype-specific Teff-mediated neurodegeneration or Treg-mediated neuroprotection is posited to result in immunomodulation and disease control [13, 45–49]. In support of this idea, adoptive transfer of CD4+CD25+ Treg into MPTP-intoxicated animals attenuates neuroinflammation leading to nigrostriatal protection [4]. We, and others, have shown that GM-CSF protein readily increases Treg numbers and activity with parallel neuroprotective activities in PD, AD, myasthenia gravis, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) models of human disease [3, 6, 7, 10, 41, 42, 44]. However, allergic treatment site reactions, muscle and bone pain, and humoral responses targeted against the protein are all side effects associated with its daily clinical use [10, 25, 26, 29]. In attempts to overcome untoward reactions and increase potency of the agent, a Gm-csf mRNA delivery strategy was developed to produce GM-CSF protein in situ, leading to parallel white blood cell increases with a selective Treg induction. No major untoward metabolic effects were observed, suggesting that Gm-csf mRNA is potentially safe for clinical use as demonstrated by other mRNA delivery methods [50]. However, increased spleen size was noted in both mice and rats following treatment, and is a well-known phenomenon following GM-CSF treatment [51]. GM-CSF is used to reconstitute myeloid-derived immune populations, which can occur by extramedullary hematopoiesis within the spleen in young rodents [52]. Therefore, spleen enlargement was likely to be observed following treatment due to the rapid immune reconstitution. Likewise, Gm-csf mRNA treatment led to classical expansion of myeloid populations, specifically dendritic cells (DCs). DCs can adopt multiple maturation states with control over many pathways [53]. Therefore, we explored several canonical markers of DC activation. Indeed, treatment led to increased CD80 and CD86 expression within the DC population. GM-CSF has been shown to upregulate CD80 and CD86 under certain circumstances [54, 55]. Thus, we believe that treatment duration and level of exposure are responsible for the upregulation observed. Overall, our observations are consistent with an intermediate phenotype, suggesting a semi-mature DC population. Partial DC maturation has been linked to immune tolerance and Treg production [56], whereas full maturation is linked to immunogenicity and signaling to advance effector T cell differentiation [53]. We also observed altered alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and amylase levels with the highest treatment group. However, these alterations still fall within normal rodent ranges and are not concerning [57–59].
LNP containing Gm-csf mRNA was administered prior to acute MPTP intoxication or during chronic exposure to α-Syn overexpression and resulted in neuroprotective responses with enhanced neuronal survival and attenuation of microglial-associated inflammation. Likewise, the neuroprotective phenotype from adoptive transfer of Gm-csf mRNA-induced Tregs supports the abilities of this cell type to directly attenuate the neuroinflammatory cascade in brain. Gm-csf mRNA treatment also shifted peripheral CD4+ T cells into an immunosuppressive phenotype and function contributing to its neuroprotective activities. These results are similar to those previously achieved through direct administration of recombinant GM-CSF protein or adoptive transfer of GM-CSF-induced Tregs [6]. The resulting phenotype shift has also been noted while treating PD subjects with sargramostim (GM-CSF, Leukine) (NCT03790670) [10]. Notably, we were able to successfully achieve similar neuroprotective effects using this alternative delivery approach providing the potential to decrease the frequency of adverse events associated with recombinant protein administration. Apart from determining the potential safety of its use and ability to modulate the immune response, treatment with lower doses of Gm-csf mRNA also provided the ability to forgo daily treatment. In our rat studies, prolonging Gm-csf mRNA treatment to every other day resulted in significant neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory responses. This is likely due to the highly elevated plasma concentration of GM-CSF protein following treatment. Therefore, this formulation acts as a proof-of-concept for the development of longer-acting mRNA formulations that will extend dosing intervals even further with the hope of decreasing known side effects associated with daily injection.
The neuroprotective capacity of Gm-csf mRNA is certainly linked to modulation of both innate and adaptive immunity which affect both pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators in PD models. Not only did treatment selectively increase Treg numbers and function in multiple species, but also resulted in increased anti-inflammatory responses and induced a CD4+ T cell population with an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Many of the key features identified using cluster analysis were linked to basic biological cell functions such as cell adhesion, trafficking, migration, and proliferation. However, nearly half of the observed features can be directly linked to a highly immunosuppressive and anti-oxidative Treg phenotype, including Il2ra, Foxp3, Ccr4, Il10, Ctla4, Nrp1, Nrn1, Cd83, Lrrc32, Lag3, Ikzf2, Il9r, Areg, Il1rl1, Zbtb32, Hopx, s100a4, s100a6, and s100a10 (Figure 6C). Classically, Il2ra, Foxp3, Ccr4, Il10, and Ctla4 encode for known Treg phenotype markers responsible for immunosuppressive mechanisms including IL-2 sequestration, IL-10 cytokine production, and inhibition of antigen presentation [60]. The significant upregulation in these markers confirms the presence of an induced Treg phenotype. Elevated levels of additional surface marker genes including Nrp1, Nrn1, Cd83, Lrrc32, and Lag3 correspond with Treg differentiation, survival, and stability [61–65]. Additionally, significant upregulation in gene markers associated with enhanced immunosuppressive function were also observed, including Ikzf2, Il9r, Areg, and Il1rl. Ikzf2 encodes for the zinc finger protein Helios, and its presence is linked to a more immunosuppressive phenotype compared to Helios- Treg [65]. Likewise, Tregs expressing the IL9 receptor, amphiregulin, and ST2 also have enhanced immunosuppressive capacity via increased IL-9 signaling and the ST2/IL-33 signaling axis [66–68]. ST2+ Treg are highly activated and maintain their suppression through increased IL-10 production and TGFβ release [68]. Gm-csf mRNA treatment also generated an induced Treg (iTreg) phenotype through the upregulation of Zbtb32 and Hopx [69, 70]. Both genes are linked to tolerance induction and innate and adaptive immune cell interactions. Lastly, proteins encoded by s100a4, s100a6, and s100a10 are present in the defined Treg phenotype and have potent antioxidant functions for immune cell regulation [70, 71][72]. Taken together, these key features can be linked to the generation of an enhanced immunosuppressive Treg population following Gm-csf mRNA treatment. Further subset analysis and more distinct clustering based on differential expression levels and K means will be carried out in future studies to identify more extensive cell phenotypes within the defined clusters linked to Gm-csf mRNA treatment.
Similarly, in the rat PD model, Gm-csf mRNA treatment led to decreases in CINC proteins needed for neutrophil attraction and proteins associated with macrophage activation, recruitment, and initiation of a pro-inflammatory immune response such as LIX, IP-10, MIP-1α, IL-1α, IL-2, and RANTES [73–75]. On the other hand, Gm-csf mRNA treatment increased IL-10 levels, a potent anti-inflammatory response mediator that decreases the immune response [60]. Taken together, observed gene and protein changes within the periphery likely are responsible for the decreased inflammatory microglial response observed within the brain in both the MPTP mouse model and α-Syn overexpression model. Previously, peripheral immune effects were shown to have profound neuroprotective effects, even without penetration of modulatory agents across the BBB [4–7]. Both T cells and cytokines can cross the BBB, potentially leading to indirect neuroprotective effects. Specifically, we have shown that Tregs migrate into the brain in limited numbers [76]. Reports by others have affirmed these results by demonstrating Treg motility for laminin migration. These lymphocyte populations show highly mobility potential than other T cell subsets in trans-well assays as seen through microporous membrane tests [77]. Results also demonstrated migration across the brain endothelium, wherein human Tregs from healthy donors show rapid migratory abilities across primary human brain endothelium. Therefore, GM-CSF-induced Tregs may have the capacity to penetrate the brain and affect cell-cell interactions within the brain microenvironment. Alternatively, direct GM-CSF neuroprotective activities remains possible, given the cytokine’s ability to cross the BBB. These studies should be explored to fully understand the underlying neuroprotective mechanisms achieved. Relevant to this study conclusions rests in the fact that axonopathy is an early neurodegenerative sign [78] and that MPTP strongly affects the striatum [5–7, 40]. GM-CSF is known to protect the dopaminergic striatal termini and is underscored by increases in TH+ densities by GM-CSF. Also, GM-CSF slows neuronal loss while protecting the striatum, as seen in α-Syn overexpressing rats. Thus, the GM-CSF effect is neuroprotective both for dopaminergic cell bodies and their projections into the striatum.
Overall, we posited that treating with Gm-csf mRNA would lead to robust neuroprotective outcomes similar to treatment with recombinant GM-CSF protein. While Gm-csf mRNA increases Treg numbers and function, it also reduces reactive microgliosis, enhances neuronal survival, and induces a profound phenotypic shift of the CD4+ T cell phenotypic repertoire. These findings were achieved using an alternative delivery approach, which decreased the dosage concentrations and prolonged the dosing intervals affording the potential for decreased side effects currently associated with treatment in existing clinical dosing schemes [10, 25, 26, 28, 29]. Also, it is now widely accepted that GM-CSF treatment induces neuroprotective Treg for stroke, PD, ALS and AD [1–3, 13, 44, 47, 48, 79–81]. Likewise, its neuroprotective nature across species and in both an acute MPTP model and chronic α-Syn overexpression model strengthens its clinical relevance and potential clinical utility. Treatment of PD subjects with recombinant GM-CSF has already indicated the cytokine’s clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, and impact on improving motor function (NCT03790670) [10]. It is likely that the types of alternative deliveries suggested in this report would further improve clinical outcomes. Therefore, taken together, this study serves to support the utilization of Gm-csf mRNA delivery as a potential therapeutic approach for PD and other neurodegenerative diseases. Lastly, given the increasing interest in Treg-mediated therapies for neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease, a potential increase in cancer risk remains a concern. Tregs can accelerate tumor progression, but do not initiate disease [82]. For PD patients, decreased Treg numbers and immunosuppressive function were recorded [8]. On balance, Treg-enhancing or -inducing therapies used to restore levels similar to their healthy, age-matched counterparts would be beneficial to slow disease and would pose limited ties to cancer development.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. David G. Standaert for the AAV2/1 constructs used in this study, Dr. Nui Meng and the UNMC Genomics and DNA Sequencing C ore for their outstanding analysis and guidance, and the UNMC Flow Cytometry Research Facility staff for exceptional flow cytometric analysis support. The work was supported, in part, by the University of Nebraska Foundation, which includes donations from the Carol Swarts, M.D. Emerging Neuroscience Research Laboratory, the Margaret R. Larson Professorship, and the Frances and Louie Blumkin and Harriet Singer Research Foundations. We thank the Vice Chancellor’s Office, of the University of Nebraska Medical Center, for Core Facility support. The research was supported by Moderna, Inc, and National Institutes of Health grants P01 DA028555, R01 NS36126, P01 NS31492, P01 MH64570, P01 NS43985, P30 MH062261, and R01 AG043540 (HEG), and 2R01 NS034239 (HEG and RLM). We also thank the INBRE grant from NIH (2P20GM103427) for supporting a site license to EndNote software. The University of Nebraska DNA Sequencing Core receives partial support from the National Institute for General Medical Science (NIGMS) INBRE - P20GM103427-14 and COBRE - 1P30GM110768-01 grants as well as The Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center Support Grant - P30CA036727. This publication’s contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or NIGMS. We also thank the Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Core at UNMC for providing scRNA-seq data analysis services, which receives support from Nebraska Research Initiative (NRI) and NIH 2P20GM103427 and 5P30CA036727.
Footnotes
Declaration of interests
☐ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Seymour de Picciotto, Sze-Wah Tse, William Walker, Jared Iacovelli, Clayton Small, Brian T. Wipke, and Eric Huang are employees of Moderna and are developing mRNA formulations for clinical translation.
Conflicts of Interes t S tatement: S dP, S -WT, WW, J I, C S, BTW, and E Y H are employees of and hold s tock and/or s tock options in Moderna, Inc.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Beers DR, Zhao W, Wang J, Zhang X, Wen S, Neal D, Thonhoff JR, Alsuliman AS, hpall EJS, ezvani KR, Appel SH, ALS patients’ regulatory T lymphocytes are dysfunctional, and correlate with disease progression rate and severity, J C I Insight 2(5) (2017) e89530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Henkel JS, Beers DR, Wen S, ivera ALR, Toennis KM, Appel JE, Zhao W, Moore DH, Powell SZ, Appel SH, R egulatory T-lymphocytes mediate amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression and survival, E MBO Mol Med 5(1) (2013) 64–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kiyota T, Machhi J, Lu Y, Dyavarshetty B, Nemati M, okoyama IY, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE , Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor neuroprotective activities in Alzheimer’s disease mice, J Neuroimmunol 319 (2018) 80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].R eynolds AD, Banerjee R, Liu J, Gendelman HE, Mosley RL , Neuroprotective activities of C D4+C D25+ regulatory T cells in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease, J Leukoc Biol 82(5) (2007) 1083–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].R eynolds AD, S tone DK, J.A. Hutter, E.J. Benner, R.L. Mosley, H.E. Gendelman, R egulatory T cells attenuate Th17 cell-mediated nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a model of Parkinson’s disease, J Immunol 184(5) (2010) 2261–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Kosloski LM, Kosmacek EA, Olson KE, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, GM-C S F induces neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory responses in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine intoxicated mice, J Neuroimmunol 265(1–2) (2013) 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Olson KE, Kosloski-Bilek LM, Anderson KM, Diggs BJ, Clark BE, Gledhill JM Jr., Shandler SJ, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, Selective VIP Receptor Agonists Facilitate Immune Transformation for Dopaminergic Neuroprotection in MPTP-Intoxicated Mice, J Neurosci 35(50) (2015) 16463–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Saunders JA, Estes KA, Kosloski LM, Allen HE, Dempsey KM, Torres-Russotto DR, Meza JL, Santamaria PM, Bertoni JM, Murman DL, Ali HH, Standaert DG, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, CD4+ regulatory and effector/memory T cell subsets profile motor dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease, J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 7(4) (2012) 927–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Olson KE, Gendelman HE, Immunomodulation as a neuroprotective and therapeutic strategy for Parkinson’s disease, Curr Opin Pharmacol 26 (2016) 87–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Gendelman HE, Zhang Y, Santamaria P, Olson KE, Schutt CR, Bhatti D, Shetty BLD, Lu Y, Estes KA, Standaert DG, Heinrichs-Graham E, Larson L, Meza JL, Follett M, Forsberg E, Siuzdak G, Wilson TW, Peterson C, Mosley RL, Evaluation of the safety and immunomodulatory effects of sargramostim in a randomized, double-blind phase 1 clinical Parkinson’s disease trial, NPJ Parkinsons Dis 3 (2017) 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Gendelman HE, Mosley RL, A Perspective on Roles Played by Innate and Adaptive Immunity in the Pathobiology of Neurodegenerative Disorders, J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 10(4) (2015) 645–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Amor S, Woodroofe MN, Innate and adaptive immune responses in neurodegeneration and repair, Immunology 141(3) (2014) 287–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Baek H, Ye M, Kang GH, Lee C, Lee G, Choi DB, Jung J, Kim H, Lee S, Kim JS, Lee HJ, Shim I, Lee JH, Bae H, Neuroprotective effects of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a 3xTg-AD Alzheimer’s disease model, Oncotarget 7(43) (2016) 69347–69357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Olanow CW, Stern MB, Sethi K, The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009), Neurology 72(21 Suppl 4) (2009) S1–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].De Virgilio A, Greco A, Fabbrini G, Inghilleri M, Rizzo MI, Gallo A, Conte M, Rosato C, Ciniglio Appiani M, de Vincentiis M, Parkinson’s disease: Autoimmunity and neuroinflammation, Autoimmun Rev 15(10) (2016) 1005–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Kannarkat GT, Boss JM, Tansey MG, The role of innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson’s disease, J Parkinsons Dis 3(4) (2013) 493–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Gelders G, Baekelandt V, Van der Perren A, Linking Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s Disease, J Immunol Res 2018 (2018) 4784268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Rocha EM, De Miranda B, Sanders LH, Alpha-synuclein: Pathology, mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease, Neurobiol Dis 109(Pt B) (2018) 249–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Rodrigues MC, Sanberg PR, Cruz LE, Garbuzova-Davis S, The innate and adaptive immunological aspects in neurodegenerative diseases, J Neuroimmunol 269(1–2) (2014) 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Stone DK, Reynolds AD, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, Innate and adaptive immunity for the pathobiology of Parkinson’s disease, Antioxid Redox Signal 11(9) (2009) 2151–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Mosley RL, Hutter-Saunders JA, Stone DK, Gendelman HE, Inflammation and adaptive immunity in Parkinson’s disease, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(1) (2012) a009381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Vivekanantham S, Shah S, Dewji R, Dewji A, Khatri C, Ologunde R, Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: role in neurodegeneration and tissue repair, Int J Neurosci 125(10) (2015) 717–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Cherry JD, Olschowka JA, O’Banion MK, Neuroinflammation and M2 microglia: the good, the bad, and the inflamed, J Neuroinflammation 11 (2014) 98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Kosloski LM, Ha DM, Hutter JA, Stone DK, Pichler MR, Reynolds AD, Gendelman HE, Mosley RL, Adaptive immune regulation of glial homeostasis as an immunization strategy for neurodegenerative diseases, J Neurochem 114(5) (2010) 1261–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Stern AC, Jones TC, The side-effect profile of GM-CSF, Infection 20 Suppl 2 (1992) S124–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Korzenik JR, Dieckgraefe BK, Valentine JF, Hausman DF, Gilbert MJ, Sargramostim G. in Crohn’s Disease Study, Sargramostim for active Crohn’s disease, N Engl J Med 352(21) (2005) 2193–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Lieschke GJ, Maher D, O’Connor M, Green M, Sheridan W, Rallings M, Bonnem E, Burgess AW, McGrath K, Fox RM, et al. , Phase I study of intravenously administered bacterially synthesized granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and comparison with subcutaneous administration, Cancer Res 50(3) (1990) 606–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Cebon JS, Bury RW, Lieschke GJ, Morstyn G, The effects of dose and route of administration on the pharmacokinetics of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Eur J Cancer 26(10) (1990) 1064–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hovgaard D, Mortensen BT, Schifter S, Nissen NI, Clinical pharmacokinetic studies of a human haemopoietic growth factor, GM-CSF, Eur J Clin Invest 22(1) (1992) 45–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Nelson J, Sorensen EW, Mintri S, Rabideau AE, Zheng W, Besin G, Khatwani N, Su SV, Miracco EJ, Issa WJ, Hoge S, Stanton MG, Joyal JL, Impact of mRNA chemistry and manufacturing process on innate activation, Sci Adv 6(26) (2020) eaaz6893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Sabnis S, Kumarasinghe ES, Salerno T, Mihai C, Ketova T, Senn JJ, Lynn A, Bulychev A, McFadyen I, Chan J, Almarsson O, Stanton MG, Benenato KE, A Novel Amino Lipid Series for mRNA Delivery: Improved Endosomal Escape and Sustained Pharmacology and Safety in Non-human Primates, Mol Ther 26(6) (2018) 1509–1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Jackson-Lewis V, Przedborski S, Protocol for the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease, Nat Protoc 2(1) (2007) 141–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Theodore S, Cao S, McLean PJ, Standaert DG, Targeted overexpression of human alpha-synuclein triggers microglial activation and an adaptive immune response in a mouse model of Parkinson disease, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 67(12) (2008) 1149–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].St Martin JL, Klucken J, Outeiro TF, Nguyen P, Keller-McGandy C, Cantuti-Castelvetri I, Grammatopoulos TN, Standaert DG, Hyman BT, McLean PJ, Dopaminergic neuron loss and up-regulation of chaperone protein mRNA induced by targeted over-expression of alpha-synuclein in mouse substantia nigra, J Neurochem 100(6) (2007) 1449–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Benner EJ, Mosley RL, Destache CJ, Lewis TB, Jackson-Lewis V, Gorantla S, Nemachek C, Green SR, Przedborski S, Gendelman HE, Therapeutic immunization protects dopaminergic neurons in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(25) (2004) 9435–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Metcalf D, Mifsud S, Di Rago L, Robb L, Nicola NA, Alexander W, The biological consequences of excess GM-CSF levels in transgenic mice also lacking high-affinity receptors for GM-CSF, Leukemia 12(3) (1998) 353–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Quah BJ, Parish CR, The use of carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) to monitor lymphocyte proliferation, J Vis Exp (44) (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Otto D, Unsicker K, FGF-2-mediated protection of cultured mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons against MPTP and MPP+: specificity and impact of culture conditions, non-dopaminergic neurons, and astroglial cells, J Neurosci Res 34(4) (1993) 382–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Kurkowska-Jastrzebska I, Wronska A, Kohutnicka M, Czlonkowski A, Czlonkowska A, The inflammatory reaction following 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3, 6-tetrahydropyridine intoxication in mouse, Exp Neurol 156(1) (1999) 50–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Mosley RL, Lu Y, Olson KE, Machhi J, Yan W, Namminga KL, Smith JR, Shandler SJ, Gendelman HE, A Synthetic Agonist to Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Receptor-2 Induces Regulatory T Cell Neuroprotective Activities in Models of Parkinson’s Disease, Front Cell Neurosci 13 (2019) 421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Hotta M, Yoshimura H, Satake A, Tsubokura Y, Ito T, Nomura S, GM-CSF therapy inhibits chronic graft-versus-host disease via expansion of regulatory T cells, Eur J Immunol 49(1) (2019) 179–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Sheng JR, Li LC, Ganesh BB, Prabhakar BS, Meriggioli MN, Regulatory T cells induced by GM-CSF suppress ongoing experimental myasthenia gravis, Clin Immunol 128(2) (2008) 172–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Weinhage T, Dabritz J, Brockhausen A, Wirth T, Bruckner M, Belz M, Foell D, Varga G, Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Activated CD39(+)/CD73(+) Murine Monocytes Modulate Intestinal Inflammation via Induction of Regulatory T Cells, Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 1(4) (2015) 433–449 e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Kelso ML, Elliott BR, Haverland NA, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor exerts protective and immunomodulatory effects in cortical trauma, J Neuroimmunol 278 (2015) 162–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Huang X, Reynolds AD, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, CD 4+ T cells in the pathobiology of neurodegenerative disorders, J Neuroimmunol 211(1–2) (2009) 3–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, T cells and Parkinson’s disease, Lancet Neurol 16(10) (2017) 769–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Ito M, Komai K, Mise-Omata S, Iizuka-Koga M, Noguchi Y, Kondo T, Sakai R, Matsuo K, Nakayama T, Yoshie O, Nakatsukasa H, Chikuma S, Shichita T, Yoshimura A, Brain regulatory T cells suppress astrogliosis and potentiate neurological recovery, Nature 565(7738) (2019) 246–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Banerjee R, Mosley RL, Reynolds AD, Dhar A, Jackson-Lewis V, Gordon PH, Przedborski S, Gendelman HE, Adaptive immune neuroprotection in G93A-SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice, PLoS One 3(7) (2008) e2740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Fletcher JM, Lalor SJ, Sweeney CM, Tubridy N, Mills KH, T cells in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, Clin Exp Immunol 162(1) (2010) 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Kowalski PS, Rudra A, Miao L, Anderson DG, Delivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery, Mol Ther 27(4) (2019) 710–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Delmer A, Karmochkine M, Cadiou M, Gerhartz H, Zittoun R, Recurrent spleen enlargement during cyclic granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome, Am J Hematol 34(1) (1990) 73–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Kim CH, Homeostatic and pathogenic extramedullary hematopoiesis, J Blood Med 1 (2010) 13–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Lutz MB, Schuler G, Immature, semi-mature and fully mature dendritic cells: which signals induce tolerance or immunity?, Trends Immunol 23(9) (2002) 445–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Santini SM, Lapenta C, Logozzi M, Parlato S, Spada M, Di Pucchio T, Belardelli F, Type I interferon as a powerful adjuvant for monocyte-derived dendritic cell development and activity in vitro and in Hu-PBL-SCID mice, J Exp Med 191(10) (2000) 1777–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Blyszczuk P, Behnke S, Luscher TF, Eriksson U, Kania G, GM-CSF promotes inflammatory dendritic cell formation but does not contribute to disease progression in experimental autoimmune myocarditis, Biochim Biophys Acta 1833(4) (2013) 934–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Schutt CR, Gendelman HE, Mosley RL, Tolerogenic bone marrow-derived dendritic cells induce neuroprotective regulatory T cells in a model of Parkinson’s disease, Mol Neurodegener 13(1) (2018) 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Novak J, Fiero K, Seifert C, Bonilla CA, Normal serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase and alkaline phosphatase levels in albino mice, Comp Biochem Physiol 36(3) (1970) 619–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Selig L, Sack U, Gaiser S, Kloppel G, Savkovic V, Mossner J, Keim V, Bodeker H, Characterisation of a transgenic mouse expressing R122H human cationic trypsinogen, BMC Gastroenterol 6 (2006) 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Wu X, Loganathan D, Linhardt RJ, Sensitive method for the quantification of beta-glucuronidase activity in human urine using capillary electrophoresis with fluorescence detection, J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 708(1–2) (1998) 61–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Schmidt A, Oberle N, Krammer PH, Molecular mechanisms of treg-mediated T cell suppression, Front Immunol 3 (2012) 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Bruder D, Probst-Kepper M, Westendorf AM, Geffers R, Beissert S, Loser K, von Boehmer H, Buer J, Hansen W, Neuropilin-1: a surface marker of regulatory T cells, Eur J Immunol 34(3) (2004) 623–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Sidaway P, Immunotherapy: Neuropilin-1 is required for Treg stability, Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14(8) (2017) 458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Doebbeler M, Koenig C, Krzyzak L, Seitz C, Wild A, Ulas T, Bassler K, Kopelyanskiy D, Butterhof A, Kuhnt C, Kreiser S, Stich L, Zinser E, Knippertz I, Wirtz S, Riegel C, Hoffmann P, Edinger M, Nitschke L, Winkler T, Schultze JL, Steinkasserer A, Lechmann M, CD83 expression is essential for Treg cell differentiation and stability, JCI Insight 3(11) (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Tran DQ, Andersson J, Wang R, Ramsey H, Unutmaz D, Shevach EM, GARP (LRRC32) is essential for the surface expression of latent TGF-beta on platelets and activated FOXP3+ regulatory T cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(32) (2009) 13445–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Huang CT, Workman CJ, Flies D, Pan X, Marson AL, Zhou G, Hipkiss EL, Ravi S, Kowalski J, Levitsky HI, Powell JD, Pardoll DM, Drake CG, Vignali DA, Role of LAG-3 in regulatory T cells, Immunity 21(4) (2004) 503–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Elyaman W, Bradshaw EM, Uyttenhove C, Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Imitola J, Bettelli E, Oukka M, van Snick J, Renauld JC, Kuchroo VK, Khoury SJ, IL-9 induces differentiation of TH17 cells and enhances function of FoxP3+ natural regulatory T cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(31) (2009) 12885–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Wang S, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ye P, Li J, Li H, Ding Q, Xia J, Amphiregulin Confers Regulatory T Cell Suppressive Function and Tumor Invasion via the EGFR/GSK-3beta/Foxp3 Axis, J Biol Chem 291(40) (2016) 21085–21095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Siede J, Frohlich A, Datsi A, Hegazy AN, Varga DV, Holecska V, Saito H, Nakae S, Lohning M, IL-33 Receptor-Expressing Regulatory T Cells Are Highly Activated, Th2 Biased and Suppress CD4 T Cell Proliferation through IL-10 and TGFbeta Release, PLoS One 11(8) (2016) e0161507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Hawiger D, Wan YY, Eynon EE, Flavell RA, The transcription cofactor Hopx is required for regulatory T cell function in dendritic cell-mediated peripheral T cell unresponsiveness, Nat Immunol 11(10) (2010) 962–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Haribhai D, Lin W, Edwards B, Ziegelbauer J, Salzman NH, Carlson MR, Li SH, Simpson PM, Chatila TA, Williams CB, A central role for induced regulatory T cells in tolerance induction in experimental colitis, J Immunol 182(6) (2009) 3461–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Zemmour D, Zilionis R, Kiner E, Klein AM, Mathis D, Benoist C, Single-cell gene expression reveals a landscape of regulatory T cell phenotypes shaped by the TCR, Nat Immunol 19(3) (2018) 291–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Goyette J, Geczy CL, Inflammation-associated S100 proteins: new mechanisms that regulate function, Amino Acids 41(4) (2011) 821–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Bryant AH, Spencer-Harty S, Owens SE, Jones RH, Thornton CA, Interleukin 4 and interleukin 13 downregulate the lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammatory response by human gestation-associated tissues, Biol Reprod 96(3) (2017) 576–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Liu M, Guo S, Hibbert JM, Jain V, Singh N, Wilson NO, Stiles JK, CXCL10/IP-10 in infectious diseases pathogenesis and potential therapeutic implications, Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 22(3) (2011) 121–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Mao L, Gao W, Chen S, Song Y, Song C, Zhou Z, Zhao H, Zhou K, Wang W, Zhu K, Liu C, Mei X, Epothilone B impairs functional recovery after spinal cord injury by increasing secretion of macrophage colony-stimulating factor, Cell Death Dis 8(11) (2017) e3162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Gong N, Liu J, Reynolds AD, Gorantla S, Mosley RL, Gendelman HE, Brain ingress of regulatory T cells in a murine model of HIV-1 encephalitis, J Neuroimmunol 230(1–2) (2011) 33–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Schneider-Hohendorf T, Stenner MP, Weidenfeller C, Zozulya AL, Simon OJ, Schwab N, Wiendl H, Regulatory T cells exhibit enhanced migratory characteristics, a feature impaired in patients with multiple sclerosis, Eur J Immunol 40(12) (2010) 3581–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Burgess RW, Crish SD, Editorial: Axonopathy in Neurodegenerative Disease, Front Neurosci 12 (2018) 769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Li P, Mao L, Zhou G, Leak RK, Sun BL, Chen J, Hu X, Adoptive regulatory T-cell therapy preserves systemic immune homeostasis after cerebral ischemia, Stroke 44(12) (2013) 3509–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Liesz A, Zhou W, Na SY, Hammerling GJ, Garbi N, Karcher S, Mracsko E, Backs J, Rivest S, Veltkamp R, Boosting regulatory T cells limits neuroinflammation in permanent cortical stroke, J Neurosci 33(44) (2013) 17350–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Yang H, Zhang A, Zhang Y, Ma S, Wang C, Resveratrol Pretreatment Protected against Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rats via Expansion of T Regulatory Cells, J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 25(8) (2016) 1914–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Gliwinski M, Piotrowska M, Iwaszkiewicz-Grzes D, Urban-Wojciuk Z, Trzonkowski P, Therapy with CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory cells - should we be afraid of cancer?, Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 23(1) (2019) 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.