Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2021 Aug 11;12:674527. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.674527

Precipitation Variability Affects Aboveground Biomass Directly and Indirectly via Plant Functional Traits in the Desert Steppe of Inner Mongolia, Northern China

Huan Cheng 1,2, Yuanbo Gong 1,*, Xiaoan Zuo 3
PMCID: PMC8385370  PMID: 34456934

Abstract

Clarifying the response of community and dominance species to climate change is crucial for disentangling the mechanism of the ecosystem evolution and predicting the prospective dynamics of communities under the global climate scenario. We examined how precipitation changes affect community structure and aboveground biomass (AGB) according to manipulated precipitation experiments in the desert steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Bayesian model and structural equation models (SEM) were used to test variation and causal relationship among precipitation, plant diversity, functional attributes, and AGB. The results showed that the responses of species richness, evenness, and plant community weighted means traits to precipitation changes in amount and year were significant. The SEM demonstrated that precipitation change in amount and year has a direct effect on richness, evenness, and community-weighted mean (CWM) for height, leaf area (LA), specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf nitrogen content (LNC), and leaf carbon content (LCC) and AGB; there into CWM for height and LDMC had a direct positive effect on AGB; LA had a direct negative effect on AGB. Three dominant species showed diverse adaptation and resource utilization strategies in response to precipitation changes. A. polyrhizum showed an increase in height under the precipitation treatments that promoted AGB, whereas the AGB of P. harmala and S. glareosa was boosted through alterations in height and LA. Our results highlight the asynchronism of variation in community composition and structure, leaf functional traits in precipitation-AGB relationship. We proposed that altered AGB resulted from the direct and indirect effects of plant functional traits (plant height, LA, LDMC) rather than species diversity, plant functional traits are likely candidate traits, given that they are mechanistically linked to precipitation changes and affected aboveground biomass in a desert steppe.

Keywords: precipitation, plant functional traits, aboveground biomass, ecosystem function, desert steppe

Introduction

For the past decades, studies on the relationship between climate change and ecosystem attributes, and potential feedback of plants have sprung up (Bai et al., 2004; Griffin Nolan et al., 2018; Zhang B. et al., 2020) because of growing unexpected climate changes and ecosystem responses. The climatic model predicted that precipitation was likely to be more uncertain (Power et al., 2013) and accompanying an increase in precipitation amount in the future in East Asia (Knapp et al., 2008; Chen and Sun, 2013). Beyond that, researchers also confirmed that precipitation has experienced intense changes in intensity and variability since the last century (Alexander et al., 2006; Trugman et al., 2018; Paschalis et al., 2020). Water availability fluctuations induced by changes in precipitation modulate plant community dynamic and ecosystem function (Yang et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2016; Peralta et al., 2019). For example, changes in the distribution of rainfall events influence the patterns of species richness and species composition (Zavaleta et al., 2003; Báez et al., 2013; Cleland et al., 2013; Libalah et al., 2020), ecosystem net primary productivity (Fay et al., 2003; Heisler-White et al., 2009), and C cycling (Harper et al., 2005). The response of a plant to variation in environment can differ among species, communities, and ecosystems, while a mechanistic comprehension of this modifiability remains open to question.

One helpful avenue to progress our understanding of plant responses to environmental change is the traits-based approach, which pays attention to environmental gradients, plant functional traits across numerous species, and physiologically and morphologically derived common performance (Nicotra et al., 2010; Wellstein et al., 2011). Studies on global patterns in plant height and seed mass are the representative practice (Moles et al., 2007, 2009). Additionally, this approach helps provide a better perspective of understanding on how environmental changes will affect the biosphere in a broad variety of circumstances, including regional climate patterns, biogeochemical cycles, ecosystem services, and functions. For example, plant height and leaf traits (specific leaf area, SLA; leaf nitrogen content, LNC; and leaf area index, LA) have been used to illustrate ecosystem function from tundra (Hudson et al., 2011; Bjorkman et al., 2018), grassland (Zirbel et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018) to forest ecosystems (Báez and Homeier, 2018; Wang and Ali, 2021). Finegan et al. (2015) reported that biomass-weighted community mean value of max height [community-weighted mean (CWM) H max] was the most important predictor of initial standing biomass, and CWM SLA was the most important predictor of the biomass increment. Finally, they proposed CWM functional traits were strong drivers of ecosystem biomass and carbon-cycle processes in three rainforests. Therefore, the traits-based approach may support uncovering the underlying mechanism of ecosystem response to variation in water availability.

Numerous studies have indicated that the response of community and ecosystem to condition changes depends on the attributes of key species (Huston, 1997; Grime, 1998), relating mass-ratio hypothesis (Suding et al., 2008; Gross et al., 2017). However, the specific role of species in community dynamic remains elusive. Due to complementarity and the selection-effects hypothesis, plant responses to condition changes are not necessarily consistent with coexisting species (Schmid and Harper, 1985; Sinclair and Byrom, 2006). For instance, Zhang R. et al. (2020) found that different from Stipa glareosa, dominance of Allium polyrhizum and Peganum harmala, two of three dominant species, increased in drought treatments. Mahaut et al. (2020) also showed that positive biodiversity influenced both aboveground biomass and a positive complementarity effect resulting from the presence of Plantago lanceolata and the CWM trait; on the contrary, the presence of Sanguisorba negatively affected productivity in the grassland diversity–productivity relationship test. These results indicated that coexisting species contributed to the ecosystem functioning differently. Thus, disentangling the role of these key species in community functioning will help to develop a deeper comprehension of the adaptation strategies of plants and ecosystem processes.

Under global climate change scenarios, studies investigating on the response of community dynamics and the ecosystem process to climate change are increasing, few studies have investigated desert steppe ecosystems functioning along environmental gradient (Zuo et al., 2020). Desert steppe ecosystems, characterized by water limitations, are thought to be sensitive to climate change, especially precipitation fluctuation (Liu et al., 2016). Xerophytic species provide habitat for desert animals and adjust their attributes to adapt and resist environmental stress (Thomey et al., 2011; El-Keblawy et al., 2015), contributing to maintaining ecosystem productivity (John et al., 2018). However, with the intensification of global climate change and human activities over the last century, desert steppe ecosystem has been suffering degradation and desertification (Mu et al., 2013) because of species diversity loss, imbalance of the xerophytic community structure, and ecosystem function decline. For this reason, more researches on the response of desert steppe ecosystem to changes in precipitation are needed, which may be conducive to restoring fragile ecosystems and to predicting the tendency of the ecosystem dynamic more precisely.

In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of precipitation changes on patterns of ecosystem aboveground biomass by the controlled, manipulated precipitation experiments in a desert steppe. Specifically, we ask three main research questions: (1) Are community composition, species diversity, plant functional traits synchronously affected by precipitation changes in desert steppe? (2) How do the direct and indirect effects of species diversity and functional traits affect community biomass; and (3) what is the role of dominant species in the community responses, relating plant-adaptive and resource-use strategies? Accordingly, we hypothesize that the expected that plant diversity, and functional traits' response to precipitation change alters AGB, and varies with different species.

Methods

Study Site

The study was conducted at the Urat Desert-grassland Research Station (Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Figure 1), located in western Inner Mongolia (Zhang R. et al., 2020; Zuo et al., 2020). The site is characterized by brown desert soil and gray-brown desert soil derived from proluvial gravel materials (China Soil Database, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, http://vdb3.soil.csdb.cn/). Climatic conditions of this study area were measured continuously and recorded by the Hailisu National Meteorological weather station. The study area has a typical temperate continental monsoon climate, affected by the Mongolian continental high-pressure air mass and characterized by a mean annual temperature of 6.3°C (1971–2018) and a mean annual precipitation of 140 mm (1971–2018; Figure 1B). The vegetation is dominated by Stipa glareosa P. Smirn., Peganum harmala L., and Allium polyrhizum Turcz. ex Regel. And Allium mongolicum, Artemisia frigida Willd., Convolvulus ammannii Desr., and Salsola collina Pall were found in our study area, but their contribution to total biomass is limited.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Geographic and climatic characteristics of the study area. (A) The map of China depicting the locations of the Urat Desert Steppe Research Station in Inner Mongolia. (B) Annual temperature and precipitation from 1971 to 2018. Dotted line represents the mean temperature and precipitation of the last 48 years. The annual mean temperature was 5.4°C. The minimum and maximum temperature in this region were 3.9 and 6.1°C. For the total annual precipitation between these years, the minimum, maximum, and average ones were 63.2, 237.8, and 135.5 mm, respectively. (C) Precipitation change treatments were established in 2015 in a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, China.

Experimental Design

The experimental design was implemented at the Urat Desert-Grassland Research Station (Figure 1A). In June, 2015, a manipulative, precipitation decrease and increase experiment was established using V-groove collector and drip irrigation distributor (Figure 1C). The rainout shelter (decreased precipitation systems) was 1.5 m high, and the V-groove collector was set on stainless-steel support with a 15° inclination. Polycarbonate plastic V-groove collector (nearly 90% penetration of UV radiation) were mounted in stainless-steel structure to collect water to induce precipitation by −60, −40, and −20%. A drip irrigation distributor consisting of stainless-steel containers in front of the V-grooves was connected to PVC pipes with holes to evenly distribute water that increased precipitation by +60, +40, and +20% (Figure 1C). The V-groove collector and drip irrigation distributor separately covered 16 m2 (4 × 4 m) and were 0.6 m apart. The experiment was randomized complete block design, with six replications for each treatment (Figure 2). The control plots without shelters received natural precipitation. In this manner, we manipulated precipitation with 60% reduction to 60% increment, respectively, relative to the natural precipitation. All the treatments were applied from May 2015, 2 years before measurements. Totally, there were 42 sampling plots, including 6 for treatments and 1 for control. These precipitation levels cover the recorded long-term variability in local precipitation, and forming a precipitation gradient, ranging from extreme drought to high precipitation (Figure 1B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Experimental design.

Measurement of Precipitation Amount

Precipitation data were obtained from the weather station of Urat Desert-grassland Research Station (Figure 1B). The natural growing season precipitation (from May to September) were 28.8 and 21.4 mm in 2017 and 2018. In 2017, actual precipitations under −60, −40, −20, +20, +40, and +60% treatments during the growing season were 11.52, 17.82, 23.04, 28.8, 34.56, 40.32, 46.08 mm, respectively. In 2018, actual precipitations under −60, −40, −20, +20, +40, and +60% treatments during the growing season were 8.65, 12.84, 17.12, 21.4, 25.68, 29.96, 34.24 mm, respectively.

Community Composition and Plant Diversity

The manipulated experiment was constructed in 2013, and the sampling of this study was carried out in August 2017 and 2018. In 42 plots, plant coverage and height of each species were measured, and the number of individuals was counted.

Based on the collection data of plant coverage, height and numbers, the Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Pielou evenness index were calculated:

Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H):

H = - ∑i=1S (Ni ln Ni)

Pielou evenness index (J):

J = H/ln S

where Ni is the relative abundance of species i and S is the total number of individuals.

Plant Functional Trait

Plant samples were collected at each site for functional trait measurements in mid-August 2017 and 2018. During the current growing season, several fully matured and healthy leaves were collected from 5 to 10 individuals of the dominant species within each plot to measure leaf functional traits according to standard methodologies (Wu et al., 2016). These traits including plant height, leaf area, specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), leaf thickness, leaf carbon content (LCC), and leaf nitrogen content (LNC) (Cornelissen et al., 2003), which were determined by an elemental analyzer (Costech ECS 4010, Italy). CWM summarized traits variation data as determined mainly by the dominant species (Valencia et al., 2015).

Response of Species Diversity and Aboveground Biomass to Precipitation Changes

To determine the effect of precipitation changes on community composition, a general linear model was performed with precipitation as an independent variable and community richness, Shannon's diversity index, and Pielou's evenness index as dependent variables. Goodness of fit for regressions was used by comparing their R2values. The effects of precipitation changes were significant when p < 0.05, and analyses were conducted, using the function “lm.”

Effect of Precipitation and Year on Functional Traits of Community-Weighted Means and Dominant Species

We calculated the CWM trait value for each plot:

CWM trait = ∑pixi (1)

where CWM trait is the CWM for the x trait and pi and xi are the relative coverage and the trait value of species i in the community. CWM represents the community-level trait value and is controlled by the trait values of the dominant species weighted by their coverage for each plant functional trait on the 42 plots separately, using the “dbFD” function in the R package “FD.”

We used ANOVA (with pairwise Tukey tests) to compare the CWMs trait distributions in the six precipitation treatments.

Response of CWM Traits

We built linear models of plant functional traits using a Bayesian approach, ranging in complexity from a single term to a two-way interaction with a focus on addressing the question of whether year, precipitation, or year-and-precipitation interactions influence plant functional traits. Thus, three models were run for each CWM trait. In all models, the CWM trait followed a normal distribution:

Plant functional traiti ~ dnorm (mui, sigmai)

where mui is the trait of each plot or species, sigmai is the variance, and i is each plot or species. linear models were fitted where the plant functional trait was a function of precipitation, year, or precipitation and year interactions, where mui was the plant functional trait of each plot or species, α was the model intercept, b1 was the coefficient of precipitation, b2 was the coefficient of a year, and b3 was the coefficient of precipitation and year interactions.

mui=a + b1 * precipitationmui= a + b1 * precipitation + b2 * yearmui=a + b1 * precipitation + b2 * year         + b3 * precipitation * year

Response of the Dominant Species Traits

The role of species is rarely considered in models that assess the impact of functional traits. We built linear mixed-effects models of growth, using a Bayesian approach, ranging complexity from a single term to having a two-way interaction, with a focus on addressing whether species, year, precipitation, or year-and-precipitation interactions influenced leaf functional traits.

muj= aj[spp] + bj[spp] * precipitationmuj= aj[spp] + bj[spp] * precipitation + dj[spp] * yearmuj= aj[spp] + bj[spp] * precipitation + dj [spp] * year         +zj[spp] * precipitation * year

where muj was the leaf functional trait of each species, αj was the model intercept, [spp] was the random effects of species, bj was the coefficient of precipitation, dj was the coefficient of year, and zj was the coefficient of the precipitation-and-year interaction.

In all models, the CWM trait (mui) and functional trait (muj) were modeled as normally distributed, and the variance hyperparameters were given diffuse gamma priors: N (mean = 0, precision = 0.01). We used the Wantanabe–Akaike information criterion (WAIC). The WAIC is a fully Bayesian information criterion valid for hierarchical models (Hooten and Hobbs, 2015). As with the other model selection criteria, smaller value of WAIC indicates a greater model predictive ability. All analyses were performed in R statistical software, version 3.6.1 (R Development Core Team, 2019).

Causal Relationship of Precipitation, Species Diversity, Plant Functional Traits, and AGB

Structural equation models were employed to analyze the causal relationship of precipitation variables, plant diversity variables, and functional trait, and AGB (a total of 12 variables). To develop the final SEMs, we started with our initial hypothesized relationships among the variables. A Pearson correlation analysis was conducted on plant diversity, precipitation, and functional traits (Supplementary Tables 6, 7). The decision to remove a path was based on the performance of the overall model fit and the p-value for the path. To simplify the SEMs, we first deleted the functional traits with no significant relationship with precipitation and year according to the results of the previous correlation analysis. We did not establish the relationships between functional traits. In addition, we hypothesized that climatic variables would significantly affect plant functional traits in the optimal model. We deleted the correlation between precipitation, year, and plant functional traits when precipitation and year did not significantly affect plant functional traits or if their addition led to a decrease in the best model interpretation. Model evaluation was determined by the chi-square (χ2) test (p > 0.05 for a satisfactory fit) and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR < 0.05 for a satisfactory fit). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to select the best model with a satisfactory fit. When a model met the criteria of the chi-square test and SRMR but contained non-significant paths in the relationship between precipitation, plant diversity indexes, and functional traits, we repeated the model fitting and evaluation by removing these paths. The total standardized effect that one variable had on another equaled the sum of its standardized direct and indirect effects. Non-significant paths of the relationship between precipitation, plant diversity indexes, and functional traits were not shown. Then we used the same criteria to structure the SEM model to show the causal relationship of precipitation, plant functional traits, and AGB of the dominant species level using the Amos graphics software.

Results

Patterns of Species Composition and Coverage Under Manipulated Precipitation Treatments

About 14 families, 14 genera, and 36 species were collected in this study, and most were perennials. A. polyrhizum, P. harmala, and S. glareosa, with higher coverage relative to others, responded dramatically to precipitation variation and were defined as dominant species (Figure 3, Supplementary Table 5). Increasing and decreasing precipitation affected species composition. Concretely, Neopallasia pectinata, Kochia prostrata, Astragalus scaberrimus, Agropyron cristatum, and Asparagus cochinchinensis were present in 2017, and A. cochinchinensis and N. pectinata were only in plots receiving −20% precipitation alteration. While Setaria viridis, Saposhnikovia divaricata, Scorzonera albicaulis, Plantago minuta, Gypsophila elegan., Coreopsis drummondii, and Bassia dasyphylla were present in 2018, and Eragrostis pilosa, Bassia dasyphylla, and S. divaricata were only in plots receiving +20, +40, or +60% precipitation alterations (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Abundance of 36 species in this study under −60, −40, −20, +20, +40, +60% precipitation treatment, and control in 2017 and 2018. The color of each panel is proportional to the value of abundance.

Sensitivity of Dominant Species to Precipitation Change

The sensitivity of dominant species to precipitation changes was reflected by coverage variation in our study. The coverage variations of A. polyrhizum, P. harmala, and S. glareosa were considerable and negative with decreased precipitation, while, under increased precipitation, the variations tended to be positive (+40 and +60% treatments), although this finding was not always the case (+20% treatment, Figure 4), and the coverage variation of the three dominant species varied between 2017 and 2018 (Figures 3, 4). Additionally, the coverage variations of dominant species were related to alterations in precipitation intensity. Specifically, in the plots with decreased precipitation, the absolute coverage variation of A. polyrhizum reached a maximum under the −60 and −40% precipitation treatment in 2017, P. harmala reached a maximum under the −60% precipitation treatment in 2018, and S. glareosa reached a maximum under the −60% precipitation treatment in 2017 (Figure 4). In the increased precipitation treatments, the absolute coverage variation of A. polyrhizum reached a maximum under the +40% precipitation treatment in 2017, P. harmala reached a maximum under the +60% precipitation treatment in 2017, and S. glareosa reached a maximum under the +40% precipitation treatment in 2018 (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Coverage variations of six precipitation treatments of A. polyrhizum (A), P. harmala (B), and S. glareosa (C), compared to control in 2017 and 2018. The different capital letter indicates significant under difference treatments in 2017 and 2018 at p < 0.05 by Duncan test.

Response of Species Diversity Index and AGB to Precipitation Change

Relationship between species richness, Pielou evenness indexes, community AGB, and precipitation were significant (Figure 5). Species richness (R2 = 0.329, p < 0.001) and community AGB (R2 = 0.463, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with increasing precipitation, and Pielou evenness (R2 = 0.283, p < 0.001) was negatively associated with increasing precipitation. However, there was no significant effect of precipitation change on Shannon's diversity (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

General linear regression analysis for richness, Shannon's diversity, evenness, aboveground biomass, and precipitation amount. Details of the fitted models are given within each panel.

Plant Functional Traits Under Precipitation Treatments

Based on linear models by Bayesian approach, we found precipitation amount changes had greater effects (with a greater coefficient) than year on CWM for height, LNC, and LCC, while the year had greater effects (with a greater coefficient) than precipitation amount changes on CWM for SLA and LA (Figure 6A). Under different precipitation treatments, significant decrease of the CWM LNC by increasing precipitation was mainly seen in plots receiving +40 and +60% precipitation treatments. And CWMs of height (especially in plots receiving +40 and +60% precipitation treatment), LA, LDMC (especially in plot receiving +60% precipitation treatment), and LCC (+60% treatment) increased with increasing precipitation. The CWMs of LA, SLA, and LNC were higher in 2018 than in 2017, involving all precipitation treatment (Figures 6, 7, Supplementary Tables 1, 2). For three dominant species, effects of precipitation and year on the leaf functional traits of species were species-specific. Response of height, leaf thickness (LT), LDMC, LNC of A. polyrhizum, height of P. harmala, and height, SLA, LDMC, LNC, and LCC of S. glareosa to precipitation were significant. Significant responses of functional traits of three dominant species to year and precipitation and year interaction were mainly shown in LT, LA, SLA, LDMC, LNC (lowest AIC, Figures 6B–D, Supplementary Tables 3, 4, 8).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The best model of community-weight means (A) and dominant species (S. glareosa, B; P. harmala, C; and A. polyrhizum, D) traits response to precipitation, year and precipitation*year. We extract the best from three possible Bayesian models, each row represents the model of traits, which are influenced by precipitation, year and precipitation*year. Blue dots indicate significant and positive response, red dots indicate significant and negative response, and black dots indicate non-significant or no response.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Community-weight mean leaf traits under six precipitation treatments (−60, −40, −20, +20, +40, +60%) and control. Values represent means ± standard errors (n = 6). The different lowercase letters indicate significant difference in 2017 at p < 0.05 by Duncan test. The different capital letters indicate significant difference in 2018 at p < 0.05 by Duncan test.

Relationships Among Precipitation, Plant Functional Traits and AGB

In final SEM (p = 0.102, df = 17, χ2 = 24.691, GFI = 0.949, RMSEA = 0.071, AIC = 122.691, Figures 8A1,A2, Supplementary Table 9) for predicting the direct and indirect effects of precipitation and year changes on aboveground biomass of community. Precipitation (β = 0.622, a standardized coefficient) had an indirect effect on AGB of a community through CWM of height (0.318), LA (−0.279), LDMC (0.351). Precipitation had positive directive effects on height (0.58), LA (0.439), LDMC (0.281), whereas a year had a negative direct effect on LA (−0.689) and had a positive direct effect on LDMC (0.29). The total variance in AGB explained by these variables was close to 59.5%. These results implied that a variation in height, LA, LDMC due to precipitation and year changes resulted in an increase in AGB.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Structural equation models (SEM) of the effects of precipitation and year on aboveground biomass of a community and three dominant species. (A1) CWM leaf traits: p = 0.102, df = 17, χ2 = 24.691, GFI = 0.949, RMSEA = 0.071, AIC = 122.691. (A2) Total standardized effects from the SEM of precipitation and year on community aboveground biomass. (B1) A. polyrhizum: p = 0.537, df = 11, χ2 = 9.921, GFI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.000, AIC = 59.921. (B2) Total standardized effects from the SEM of precipitation and year on aboveground biomass of A. polyrhizum. (C1) P. harmala: p = 0.341, df = 13, χ2 = 14.482, GFI = 0.953, RMSEA = 0.04, AIC = 60.482. (C2) Total standardized effects from the SEM of precipitation and year on aboveground biomass of P. harmala. (D1) S. glareosa: p = 0.481, df = 16, χ2 = 15.607, GFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.000, AIC = 93.607. (D2) Total standardized effects from the SEM of precipitation and year on aboveground biomass of S. glareosa. The blue and red arrows represent significant positive and negative pathways, the gray dashed arrows represent no significant pathways, respectively. Numbers adjacent to the arrows are standardized path coefficients, analogous to relative regression weights and indicative of the effect size of the relation. The thickness of the arrows is proportional to the magnitude of the standardized path coefficient s. The arrow width is proportional to the strength of the relationship.

The AGB of A. polyrhizum was, however, driven by height owing to precipitation and year changes (p = 0.537, df = 11, χ2 = 9.921, GFI = 0.952, RMSEA = 0.000, AIC = 59.921, Figures 8B1,B2, Supplementary Table 10). For P. harmala (p = 0.341, df = 13, χ2 = 14.482, GFI = 0.953, RMSEA = 0.04, AIC = 60.482, Figures 8C1,C2, Supplementary Table 11) and S. glareosa (p = 0.481, df = 16, χ2 = 15.607, GFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.000, AIC = 93.607, Figures 8D1,D2, Supplementary Table 12), precipitation and a year had significant effects on AGB through height and LA.

Discussion

Precipitation Treatments Changed Community Composition and Species Diversity

We found a positive linear relationship between species richness and precipitation, implying that precipitation change influenced community composition. E. pilosa and A. polyrhizum were found to be more abundant in plots receiving increased precipitation in our study, which was characterized by rapid growth and low water-use efficiency (Blumenthal et al., 2020). Enhanced water availability contributed to the germination of dormant seeds or vegetation tissue of these species (Finch Savage and Leubner Metzger, 2006), plant photosynthesis and respiration (Huxman et al., 2004), further promoting growth and reproduction (Huang et al., 2018), consequently regulating community composition and species richness (Walck et al., 2011). A. polyrhizum, P. harmala, and S. glareosa, with higher coverage, responded to precipitation changes dramatically. A remarkable increase in dominant species abundance resulted in the increased dominance of these three species while the dominance of rare species decreased, explaining the negative linear relationship between evenness and precipitation. However, there is no significant effect of precipitation change on Shannon's diversity index, this may relate to condition-type specific (Thuiller et al., 2005; Irl et al., 2015). For example, a study in the Great Plains of USA (Byrne et al., 2017) reported that a positive linear relationship between precipitation and Shannon's diversity in shortgrass steppe and a negative relationship in a mixed grass prairie. In addition, in tropic forests and savannas, negative or unimodal patterns were found in species' or communities' responses to increasing precipitation and the relationship was amplified by biological and abiotic processes (Givnish, 1999). Hence, the effect of climatic factors on species diversity needs to be further explored in different ecosystem types.

Plant Functional Traits Were Altered by Precipitation Treatments and Year Variation

The present study indicated that CWMs of plant height, LA, LDMC, and LCC increased, and LNC decreased with increasing precipitation, which supported the leaf economics spectrum (Wright et al., 2004), indicating higher acquisition and turnover of resources in plants with increasing water availability (Wright et al., 2004). Plant height is supposed to be a central part of the plant ecological strategy from our study and other previous studies (Westoby, 1998; Falster and Westoby, 2003; Moles et al., 2009; De Frenne et al., 2011). Moles et al. (2009) reported a remarkably tight relationship between latitude and height, pointing out that plant height was strongly correlated with a life span, seed mass, and time to maturity. With an increase in precipitation, the photosynthetic rate was promoted by increasing the leaf area, and more biomass accumulated in a short time (Wright et al., 2001; Barker et al., 2006; Wilcox et al., 2021). Increased precipitation should cause a pronounced shift toward communities with taller plants and with more resource acquisition and storage leaves (high LA, LDMC, and LCC). These relationships underline the potential importance of plant stature for growth, survival, and adaptation, and they may influence ecosystem dynamics and services during climate or condition changes (Lv et al., 2019). Furthermore, LA, SLA, LDMC, and LNC, “growth investment” traits changed greatly by year (Schellenberger Costa et al., 2018), as shown by greater CWMs for “fast” traits during wet years (Poorter and Bongers, 2006; Reich, 2014) and greater values for LDMC related to more tolerance during dry years (Markesteijn et al., 2011).

Additionally, we found that the extent of plant functional trait responses to precipitation changes varies with species type, implying the different adaptive and resource-use strategies of the three species (Reich et al., 2003; Fort et al., 2013). A. polyrhizum exhibited significant responses to precipitation changes in six of the seven traits (except for LCC), which was more sensitive to short-term precipitation changes (precipitation treatments) with greater height and LDMC, thinner thickness, and lower LNC to increased precipitation, which is related to a fast-growth strategy and fast resource acquisition (Reich, 2014). P. harmala was more tolerant to precipitation changes (Ahmed and Khan, 2010), with five significant traits (except for LT and LDMC). We believe that S. glareosa showed greater fitness by regulating more leaf traits (seven traits) when subjected to environmental stress or habitat change, which is related to its slow-growth strategy and slow resource acquisition.

Precipitation and Year Regulated AGB via Plant Functional Traits

Our study explains the pathway of precipitation effect on AGB in dryland. SEM analyses demonstrated that the patterns of CWMs for height, LA, and LDMC altered by the precipitation treatment and a year were strongly related to AGB. These results are in line with those of other studies that showed that CWMs have an important consequence for ecosystem functioning along environment gradient (Diaz et al., 2007; Roscher et al., 2012; Chiang et al., 2016; Cadotte, 2017). Van'T Veen et al. (2020) suggested that temperature and precipitation explained additional 22.1% of the variation in productivity, and that functional trait composition was an important predictor of grassland productivity in Switzerland grasslands. Combining previous studies, we believe that leaf functional traits (except for LT) are good response traits to precipitation change at the community level (Gross et al., 2008; Suding et al., 2008; Sterk et al., 2013). While the altered AGB results from direct effects of precipitation change on the part of response traits (plant height, LA, and LDMC).

An investigation of how traits of dominant species respond to precipitation changes and how they influence AGB can help understand the role of species in ecosystem dynamics and resource-use strategies (Lawton, 1994; Smith and Knapp, 2003; Sinclair and Byrom, 2006). In this study, the response of the plant height of A. polyrhizum to short-term precipitation changes affected AGB, supporting Hu et al. (2019). The shallow-root system, large mesophyll cells, and chloroplasts of A. polyrhizum promoted the utilization of surface soil water and provided the foundation for the high photosynthetic rate under conditions of sufficient water supply (Ivanov et al., 2004; Hu et al., 2019). Thus, A. polyrhizum was defined as an opportunist in our study and was characterized by fast growth in height within a short time, high water content in its leaves, and low water-use efficiency (Blumenthal et al., 2020). The response and adaptation strategies of P. harmala and S. glareosa were different from those of A. polyrhizum. Precipitation and annual changes affected AGB via height and LA in P. harmala and S. glareosa; they developed a great number of cells and chloroplasts in its leaves and a large leaf assimilation surface that provided greater photosynthetic rates and higher efficiency of water use (Ivanov et al., 2004; Baiakhmetov et al., 2020), resulting in a higher capacity for carbon storage and more fitness under water limitation. Overall, P. harmala and S. glareosa with more fitness and tolerance, are key species for maintaining ecosystem stability in this study (Richmond et al., 2005; Brotherton and Joyce, 2015), helping the ecosystem withstand disturbance, such as drought.

Conclusion

Our results suggested the significant responses of species diversity and plant functional traits were found when water deficiency was alleviated along a precipitation gradient. The structural equation models demonstrated that precipitation change in amount and year has a direct effect on richness, evenness, and CWM for height, LA, SLA, DLMC, LNC and LCC, and AGB; there into, CWM for height and LDMC had a direct positive effect on AGB; LA had a direct negative effect on AGB. For dominant species, A. polyrhizum showed an increase in height under the precipitation treatments that promoted AGB, whereas the AGB of P. harmala and S. glareosa was boosted through alterations in height and LA. In summary, changes in precipitation amount affected plant AGB through leaf functional traits (height, LA, LDMC) rather than species diversity. We supposed that plant height, LA, LDMC are likely candidate traits, given they are mechanistically linked to precipitation changes and affected aboveground biomass in desert-steppe. And the adaptation and resource utilization strategies in response to precipitation changes are species-specific.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

HC and YG conceived the idea and wrote most of the manuscript. XZ contributed to part of writing and overall improvement of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Nathan G. Swenson and Dr. Qianfeng Wang for advice on data analysis, and the members of the Urat Desert-grassland Research Station and Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (IMGERS) for their assistance in the experimental setup and data collection, as well as Sujun Liu for English language editing. We also thank the editors and peer reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

Footnotes

Funding. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42071140 and 41622103).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.674527/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (96.8KB, doc)

References

  1. Ahmed M. Z., Khan M. A. (2010). Tolerance and recovery responses of playa halophytes to light, salinity and temperature stresses during seed germination. Flora 205, 764–771. 10.1016/j.flora.2009.10.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander L. V., Zhang X., Peterson T. C., Caesar J., Gleason B., Klein Tank A., et al. (2006). Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111:D5109. 10.1029/2005JD006290 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Báez S., Collins S. L., Pockman W. T., Johnson J. E., Small E. E. (2013). Effects of experimental rainfall manipulations on Chihuahuan Desert grassland and shrubland plant communities. Oecologia 172, 1117–1127. 10.1007/s00442-012-2552-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Báez S., Homeier J. (2018). Functional traits determine tree growth and ecosystem productivity of a tropical montane forest: insights from a long-term nutrient manipulation experiment. Global Change Biol. 24, 399–409. 10.1111/gcb.13905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai Y., Han X., Wu J., Chen Z., Li L. (2004). Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Nature 431, 181–184. 10.1038/nature02850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baiakhmetov E., Nowak A., Gudkova P. D., Nobis M. (2020). Morphological and genome-wide evidence for natural hybridisation within the genus Stipa (Poaceae). Sci. Rep. UK 10, 1–14. 10.1038/s41598-020-70582-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker D. H., Vanier C., Naumburg E., Charlet T. N., Nielsen K. M., Newingham B. A., et al. (2006). Enhanced monsoon precipitation and nitrogen deposition affect leaf traits and photosynthesis differently in spring and summer in the desert shrubLarrea tridentata. New Phytol. 169, 799–808. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01628.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bjorkman A. D., Myers-Smith I. H., Elmendorf S. C., Normand S., Rüger N., Beck P. S. A., et al. (2018). Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome. Nature 562, 57–62. 10.1038/s41586-018-0563-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blumenthal D. M., Mueller K. E., Kray J. A., Ocheltree T. W., Augustine D. J., Wilcox K. R. (2020). Traits link drought resistance with herbivore defence and plant economics in semi-arid grasslands: the central roles of phenology and leaf dry matter content. J. Ecol. 108, 2336–2351. 10.1111/1365-2745.13454 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brotherton S. J., Joyce C. B. (2015). Extreme climate events and wet grasslands: plant traits for ecological resilience. Hydrobiologia 750, 229–243. 10.1007/s10750-014-2129-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Byrne K. M., Adler P. B., Lauenroth W. K. (2017). Contrasting effects of precipitation manipulations in two great plains plant communities. J. Veg. Sci. 28, 238–249. 10.1111/jvs.12486 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cadotte M. W. (2017). Functional traits explain ecosystem function through opposing mechanisms. Ecol. Lett. 20, 989–996. 10.1111/ele.12796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen H., Sun J. (2013). Projected change in East Asian summer monsoon precipitation under RCP scenario. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 121, 55–77. 10.1007/s00703-013-0257-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiang J., Spasojevic M. J., Muller-Landau H. C., Sun I., Lin Y., Su S., et al. (2016). Functional composition drives ecosystem function through multiple mechanisms in a broadleaved subtropical forest. Oecologia 182, 829–840. 10.1007/s00442-016-3717-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cleland E. E., Collins S. L., Dickson T. L., Farrer E. C., Gross K. L., Gherardi L. A., et al. (2013). Sensitivity of grassland plant community composition to spatial vs. Temporal variation in precipitation. Ecology 94, 1687–1696. 10.1890/12-1006.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cornelissen J., Lavorel S., Garnier E., Díaz S., Buchmann N., Gurvich D. E., et al. (2003). A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51, 335–380. 10.1071/BT02124 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. De Frenne P., Graae B. J., Kolb A., Shevtsova A., Baeten L., Brunet J., et al. (2011). An intraspecific application of the leaf-height-seed ecology strategy scheme to forest herbs along a latitudinal gradient. Ecography 34, 132–140. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06399.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Diaz S., Lavorel S., de Bello F., Quetier F., Grigulis K., Robson T. M. (2007). Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. PNAS 104, 20684–20689. 10.1073/pnas.0704716104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. El-Keblawy A., Abdelfattah M. A., Khedr A. A. (2015). Relationships between landforms, soil characteristics and dominant xerophytes in the hyper-arid northern United Arab Emirates. J. Arid Environ. 117, 28–36. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.02.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Falster D. S., Westoby M. (2003). Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 337–343. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00061-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fay P. A., Carlisle J. D., Knapp A. K., Blair J. M., Collins S. L. (2003). Productivity responses to altered rainfall patterns in a C 4 -dominated grassland. Oecologia 137, 245–251. 10.1007/s00442-003-1331-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Finch Savage W. E., Leubner Metzger G. (2006). Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 171, 501–523. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01787.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Finegan B., Peña-Claros M., de Oliveira A., Ascarrunz N., Bret-Harte M. S., Carreño-Rocabado G., et al. (2015). Does functional trait diversity predict above-ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses. J. Ecol. 103, 191–201. 10.1111/1365-2745.12346 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fort F., Jouany C., Cruz P. (2013). Root and leaf functional trait relations in Poaceae species: implications of differing resource-acquisition strategies. J. Plant Ecol. 6, 211–219. 10.1093/jpe/rts034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Givnish T. J. (1999). On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. J. Ecol. 87, 193–210. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00333.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Griffin Nolan R. J., Bushey J. A., Carroll C. J., Challis A., Chieppa J., Garbowski M., et al. (2018). Trait selection and community weighting are key to understanding ecosystem responses to changing precipitation regimes. Funct. Ecol. 32, 1746–1756. 10.1111/1365-2435.13135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grime J. P. (1998). Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86, 902–910. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gross N., Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y., Liancourt P., Berdugo M., Gotelli N. J., Maestre F. T. (2017). Functional trait diversity maximizes ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–9. 10.1038/s41559-017-0132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gross N., Robson T. M., Lavorel S., Albert C., Le Bagousse Pinguet Y., Guillemin R. (2008). Plant response traits mediate the effects of subalpine grasslands on soil moisture. New Phytol. 180, 652–662. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02577.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Harper C. W., Blair J. M., Fay P. A., Knapp A. K., Carlisle J. D. (2005). Increased rainfall variability and reduced rainfall amount decreases soil CO2 flux in a grassland ecosystem. Global Change Biol. 11, 322–334. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00899.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Heisler-White J. L., Blair J. M., Kelly E. F., Harmoney K., Knapp A. K. (2009). Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Global Change Biol. 15, 2894–2904. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01961.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hooten M. B., Hobbs N. T. (2015). A guide to Bayesian model selection for ecologists. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 3–28. 10.1890/14-0661.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hu X., Hirota M., Wuyunna Kawada K., Li H., Meng S., et al. (2019). Responses in gross primary production of Stipa krylovii and Allium polyrhizum to a temporal rainfall in a temperate grassland of Inner Mongolia, China. J. Arid Land 11, 824–836. 10.1007/s40333-019-0127-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang G., Li C., Li Y. (2018). Phenological responses to nitrogen and water addition are linked to plant growth patterns in a desert herbaceous community. Ecol. Evol. 8, 5139–5152. 10.1002/ece3.4001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hudson J., Henry G., Cornwell W. K. (2011). Taller and larger: shifts in Arctic tundra leaf traits after 16 years of experimental warming. Global Change Biol. 17, 1013–1021. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02294.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huston M. A. (1997). Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110, 449–460. 10.1007/s004420050180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Huxman T. E., Snyder K. A., Tissue D., Leffler A. J., Ogle K., Pockman W. T., et al. (2004). Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141, 254–268. 10.1007/s00442-004-1682-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Irl S. D. H., Harter D. E. V., Steinbauer M. J., Gallego Puyol D., Fernández-Palacios J. M., Jentsch A., et al. (2015). Climate vs. topography – spatial patterns of plant species diversity and endemism on a high-elevation island. J. Ecol. 103, 1621–1633. 10.1111/1365-2745.12463 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ivanov L. A., Ivanova L. A., Ronzhina D. A., Chechulin M. L., Tserenkhand G., Gunin P. D., et al. (2004). Structural and functional grounds for ephedra sinica expansion in mongolian steppe ecosystems. Russ. J. Plant Physl. 51, 469–475. 10.1023/B:RUPP.0000035738.89102.fc [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. John R., Chen J., Giannico V., Park H., Xiao J., Shirkey G., et al. (2018). Grassland canopy cover and aboveground biomass in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia: spatiotemporal estimates and controlling factors. Remote Sens. Environ. 213, 34–48. 10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Knapp A. K., Beier C., Briske D. D., Classen A. T., Luo Y., Reichstein M., et al. (2008). Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. BioScience 58, 811–821. 10.1641/B580908 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lawton J. H. (1994). What do species do in ecosystems? Oikos 71:367. 10.2307/3545824 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Libalah M. B., Droissart V., Sonké B., Barbier N., Dauby G., Fortunel C., et al. (2020). Additive influences of soil and climate gradients drive tree community composition of Central African rain forests. J. Veg. Sci. 31, 1154–1167. 10.1111/jvs.12918 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu T., Xu Z., Hou Y., Zhou G. (2016). Effects of warming and changing precipitation rates on soil respiration over two years in a desert steppe of northern China. Plant Soil 400, 15–27. 10.1007/s11104-015-2705-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lv X., He Q., Zhou G. (2019). Contrasting responses of steppe Stipa ssp. To warming and precipitation variability. Ecol. Evol. 9, 9061–9075. 10.1002/ece3.5452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mahaut L., Fort F., Violle C., Freschet G. T. (2020). Multiple facets of diversity effects on plant productivity: species richness, functional diversity, species identity and intraspecific competition. Funct. Ecol. 34, 287–298. 10.1111/1365-2435.13473 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Markesteijn L., Poorter L., Bongers F., Paz H., Sack L. (2011). Hydraulics and life history of tropical dry forest tree species: coordination of species' drought and shade tolerance. New Phytol. 191, 480–495. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03708.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Moles A. T., Ackerly D. D., Tweddle J. C., Dickie J. B., Smith R., Leishman M. R., et al. (2007). Global patterns in seed size. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 109–116. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00259.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Moles A. T., Warton D. I., Warman L., Swenson N. G., Laffan S. W., Zanne A. E., et al. (2009). Global patterns in plant height. J. Ecol. 97, 923–932. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01526.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mu S. J., Chen Y. Z., Li J. L., Ju W. M., Odeh I. O. A., Zou X. L. (2013). Grassland dynamics in response to climate change and human activities in Inner Mongolia, China between 1985 and 2009. Rangeland J. 35, 315. 10.1071/RJ12042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nicotra A. B., Atkin O. K., Bonser S. P., Davidson A. M., Finnegan E. J., Mathesius U., et al. (2010). Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 684–692. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Paschalis A., Fatichi S., Zscheischler J., Ciais P., Bahn M., Boysen L., et al. (2020). Rainfall manipulation experiments as simulated by terrestrial biosphere models: where do we stand? Global Change Biol. 26, 3336–3355. 10.1111/gcb.15024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Peralta A. M., Sánchez A. M., Luzuriaga A. L., de Bello F., Escudero A. (2019). Evidence of functional species sorting by rainfall and biotic interactions: a community monolith experimental approach. J. Ecol. 107, 2772–2788. 10.1111/1365-2745.13210 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Poorter L., Bongers F. (2006). Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87, 1733–1743. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1733:LTAGPO]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Power S., Delage F., Chung C., Kociuba G., Keay K. (2013). Robust twenty-first-century projections of El Niño and related precipitation variability. Nature 502, 541–545. 10.1038/nature12580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. R Development Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org/
  57. Reich P. B. (2014). The world-wide 'fast-slow' plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J. Ecol. 102, 275–301. 10.1111/1365-2745.12211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Reich P. B., Wright I. J., Cavender Bares J., Craine J. M., Oleksyn J., Westoby M., et al. (2003). The evolution of plant functional variation: traits, spectra, and strategies. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, S143–S164. 10.1086/374368 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Richmond C. E., Breitburg D. L., Rose K. A. (2005). The role of environmental generalist species in ecosystem function. Ecol. Model. 188, 279–295. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Roscher C., Schumacher J., Gubsch M., Lipowsky A., Weigelt A., Buchmann N., et al. (2012). Using plant functional traits to explain diversity-productivity relationships. PLoS ONE 7:e36760. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schellenberger Costa D., Gerschlauer F., Kiese R., Fischer M., Kleyer M., Hemp A. (2018). Plant niche breadths along environmental gradients and their relationship to plant functional traits. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1869–1882. 10.1111/ddi.12815 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schmid B., Harper J. L. (1985). Clonal growth in grassland perennials: I. Density and pattern-dependent competition between plants with different growth forms. J. Ecol. 73, 793–808. 10.2307/2260147 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sinclair A., Byrom A. E. (2006). Understanding ecosystem dynamics for conservation of biota. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 64–79. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01036.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith M. D., Knapp A. K. (2003). Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol. Lett. 6, 509–517. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00454.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sterk M., Gort G., Klimkowska A., van Ruijven J., van Teeffelen A. J. A., Wamelink G. W. W. (2013). Assess ecosystem resilience: linking response and effect traits to environmental variability. Ecol. Indic. 30, 21–27. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Suding K. N., Lavorel S., Chapin F. S., Cornelissen J. H. C., Diaz S., Garnier E., et al. (2008). Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biol. 14, 1125–1140. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Thomey M. L., Collins S. L., Vargas R., Johnson J. E., Brown R. F., Natvig D. O., et al. (2011). Effect of precipitation variability on net primary production and soil respiration in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Global Change Biol. 17, 1505–1515. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02363.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Thuiller W., Lavorel S., Araujo M. B., Sykes M. T., Prentice I. C. (2005). Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. PNAS 102, 8245–8250. 10.1073/pnas.0409902102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Trugman A. T., Medvigy D., Mankin J. S., Anderegg W. R. L. (2018). Soil moisture stress as a major driver of carbon cycle uncertainty. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 6495–6503. 10.1029/2018GL078131 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Valencia E., Maestre F. T., Le Bagousse Pinguet Y., Quero J. L., Tamme R., Börger L., et al. (2015). Functional diversity enhances the resistance of ecosystem multifunctionality to aridity in M editerranean drylands. New Phytol. 206, 660–671. 10.1111/nph.13268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Van'T Veen H., Chalmandrier L., Sandau N., Nobis M. P., Descombes P., Psomas A., et al. (2020). A landscape-scale assessment of the relationship between grassland functioning, community diversity, and functional traits. Ecol. Evol. 10, 9906–9919. 10.1002/ece3.6650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Walck J. L., Hidayati S. N., Dixon K. W., Thompson K., Poschlod P. (2011). Climate change and plant regeneration from seed. Global Change Biol. 17, 2145–2161. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02368.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang L., Ali A. (2021). Climate regulates the functional traits-aboveground biomass relationships at a community-level in forests: a global meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 761:143238. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wellstein C., Schröder B., Reineking B., Zimmermann N. E. (2011). Understanding species and community response to environmental change-a functional trait perspective. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 145, 1–4. 10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Westoby M. (1998). A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant Soil 199, 213–227. 10.1023/A:1004327224729 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilcox K. R., Blumenthal D. M., Kray J. A., Mueller K. E., Derner J. D., Ocheltree T., et al. (2021). Plant traits related to precipitation sensitivity of species and communities in semiarid shortgrass prairie. New Phytol. 229, 2007–2019. 10.1111/nph.17000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wright I. J., Reich P. B., Westoby M. (2001). Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Funct. Ecol. 15, 423–434. 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00542.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wright I. J., Reich P. B., Westoby M., Ackerly D. D., Baruch Z., Bongers F., et al. (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827. 10.1038/nature02403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wu J., Wurst S., Zhang X. (2016). Plant functional trait diversity regulates the nonlinear response of productivity to regional climate change in Tibetan alpine grasslands. Sci. Rep. UK 6:35649. 10.1038/srep35649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Xu Z., Li M. H., Zimmermann N. E., Li S. P., Li H., Ren H., et al. (2018). Plant functional diversity modulates global environmental change effects on grassland productivity. J. Ecol. 106, 1941–1951. 10.1111/1365-2745.12951 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Yang H., Li Y., Wu M., Zhang Z., Li L., Wan S. (2011). Plant community responses to nitrogen addition and increased precipitation: the importance of water availability and species traits. Global Change Biol. 17, 2936–2944. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02423.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zavaleta E. S., Shaw M. R., Chiariello N. R., Mooney H. A., Field C. B. (2003). Additive effects of simulated climate changes, elevated CO2, and nitrogen deposition on grassland diversity. PNAS 100, 7650–7654. 10.1073/pnas.0932734100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhang B., Hautier Y., Tan X., You C., Cadotte M. W., Chu C., et al. (2020). Species responses to changing precipitation depend on trait plasticity rather than trait means and intraspecific variation. Funct. Ecol. 34, 2622–2633. 10.1111/1365-2435.13675 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang R., Zhao X., Zuo X., Degen A. A., Li Y., Liu X., et al. (2020). Drought-induced shift from a carbon sink to a carbon source in the grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China. Catena 195:104845. 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104845 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zirbel C. R., Bassett T., Grman E., Brudvig L. A. (2017). Plant functional traits and environmental conditions shape community assembly and ecosystem functioning during restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1070–1079. 10.1111/1365-2664.12885 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zuo X., Cheng H., Zhao S., Yue P., Liu X., Wang S., et al. (2020). Observational and experimental evidence for the effect of altered precipitation on desert and steppe communities. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 21:e864. 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00864 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (96.8KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES