Abstract
Purpose:
This study explored parent views on school involvement in screening and identification of adolescent depression.
Methods:
Cross-sectional internet-based survey with the C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health. Of 2004 parents (63.4% response rate), 770 had a middle/high school student and were eligible for this module. Post-stratification weights were generated by survey vendor Ipsos. Descriptive and bivariate results were calculated; multinomial logit regression models controlled for parent sex, race/ethnicity, education, employment status, and school level.
Results:
Parent respondents were 54.8% female, 57.5% white, 64.3% above a high school education, and 79.7% employed; 76.2% were answering based on a high school student. Most parents supported school-based depression screens starting in 6th (46.7%) or 7th (15.1%) grades, though 15.9% responded no screening should be done. Among parent respondents 93.2% wished to be informed of a positive screen. Regression analysis found parents of middle school students were 4.18 times more likely to prefer 6th versus 9–12th grade to start screening.
Conclusions:
Most parents support middle school depression screening, but overwhelmingly wished to be informed of a positive result. Guidelines for maintaining adolescent confidentiality in a school-based depression screening program will require careful consideration.
Keywords: depression, adolescents, adolescent parenting, screening, disclosure
The prevalence of annual major depressive disorder episodes (MDD) among United States (US) adolescents rose by 60% from 8.3% in 2008 to 14.4% in 2018.1 Schools have responded with efforts to educate about MDD and provide adolescents opportunities to access services, but little information exists on parent perception of the school role in mental health.2–5
Screening in High Schools to Identify, Evaluate and Lower Depression is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) examining the effectiveness of universal school-based adolescent depression screening in partnership with fourteen Pennsylvania public high schools.6 While parent response to the RCT has been overall positive, these views may not be representative of parents across the US.
To describe parent opinions about school-based depression screening on the national level, we partnered with the University of Michigan’s C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health (NPCH), a cross-sectional, recurring online survey about child health topics. Exploratory objectives included analysis of responses by parent self-reported sociodemographic factors and adolescent factors.
Methods
Study Design
The NPCH is fielded by Ipsos to its web-enabled KnowledgePanel®, the largest nationally representative probability-based sample of US households. Panel recruitment uses random selection of phone numbers and residential addresses with oversampling in census blocks with high-density minority communities. Individuals without Internet access are provided a laptop and Internet service connection at no cost. Participants provide demographic data, used for sampling, weighting, and to populate demographic variables included with survey data. Panel members receive email notification when a new survey is available. Ipsos operates a modest incentive program with panel members averaging two to three surveys monthly with durations of 10 to 15 minutes. Additional information on KnowledgePanel® can be found at https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/solutions/public-affairs/knowledgepanel.
The NPCH team develops and fields surveys about three times yearly with a sample of approximately 2,000 panel members with children. Each fielding includes multiple child health topics, with questions targeted based on family characteristics, e.g. child age. Recruitment emails do not specify survey topics.
This study was approved by both the University of Michigan Medical School and Penn State College of Medicine Institutional Review Boards. This NPCH wave was pretested from August 2–5, 2019 with a separate convenience sample of 101 KnowledgePanel® members. The main survey was fielded from August 9 to September 2, 2019, to 3,163 adult KnowledgePanel® members, with a target of 2,000 completed surveys. Eligible respondents were self-identified parents or legal guardians of a child 0–18 years-old living in the same household (full or part-time). Eligibility for the adolescent depression module required parents to report at least one child 13–18 years-old enrolled in middle, junior high, or high school in the 2019–2020 academic year. For respondents with more than one child meeting those criteria, one was randomly selected to populate the child-specific questions in this module.
Statistical Analysis
Ipsos provided de-identified data with 2018 US Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey based post-stratification weights used to match the US population distribution on sex, age, race/ethnicity, census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West), metropolitan status, education, and household income. Frequency distributions and descriptive statistics were calculated for all eligible participants. Bivariate analysis was performed using χ2 tests to determine relationships between survey responses and demographic variables. The number of respondents was unweighted while all other estimates were calculated using sample survey weights. In an exploratory analysis, multinomial logistic regression used grade level grouped as 6th, 7–8th and 9–12th as the baseline outcome categories. All analyses used survey commands in Stata version 15 (Stata Corp., College Station, Texas).
Results
Of 3,163 sampled KnowledgePanel® members, 2,004 (63.4%) completed the full NPCH survey, with an average response time of 8 minutes; 770 parents were eligible for the questions on school-based MDD screening. Parent demographics included 54.8% (410) female, 57.5% (539) white, 70.6% (536) under 50 years-old, 54.8% (402) household income under $100K, 64.3% (562) above a high school education, 78.3% (620) married, 79.7% (631) working, 87.8% (669) living in a metropolitan area, and 76.2% (590) answering on behalf of a high school student.
Most (70.5%) parents responded favorably to school-based depression screening; the majority elected 6th grade to start screenings (Table 1). If a school-based screening indicated depression, 93.2% of parents wished to be informed. Bivariate analysis of preferred grade to begin screening (6th versus 7–8th versus 9–12th) found parent sex, race/ethnicity, education and student’s grade (middle vs. high school) were significant (p<0.05) with employment status as borderline significant (p=0.52).
Table 1:
Depression screening in schools | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Definitely yes | Probably yes | Probably no | Definitely no | |
Do you think your son/daughter’s school should screen all students for depression? (n=766) | 204 (28.6) | 330 (41.9) | 179 (22.4) | 53 (7.1) |
At what grade level should schools begin? (n=761) | 6th | 336 (46.7) | ||
7th | 121 (15.1) | |||
8th | 73 (8.7) | |||
9th | 70 (9.2) | |||
10th | 20 (2.7) | |||
11th | 8 (1.2) | |||
12th | 4 (0.5) | |||
None- should not be done | 129 (15.9) | |||
Yes | No | Student should decide | Not sure | |
If a screening shows that a student (of any age) has signs of depression, should that student’s parents be informed? (n=760) | 710 (93.2) | 4 (0.5) | 21 (2.9) | 25 (3.4) |
Yes | No | Don’t know | ||
Do your son/daughter’s school currently provide mental health services for students? (n=765) | 241 (29.7) | 172 (23.1) | 352 (47.3) |
The number of respondents provided is unweighted while percentages were calculated using sample survey weights
Multinomial logit regression (Table 2) demonstrated parents with a middle school student were 4.18 times more likely to prefer 6th grade versus 9–12th to start screening. Respondents who self-identified as white were 2.70 times more likely to prefer 7th or 8th grade versus 6th grade for middle school screening. Fathers were 2.68 times more likely to prefer screening in high school.
Table 2.
7–8th vs. 6th | 9–12th vs. 6th | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Odds Ratio | 95% CI | Overall | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | Overall | |||
p value | p value | |||||||
Parent Sex | ||||||||
Male | 1.250 | 0.833 | 1.877 | 2.682 | 1.589 | 4.524 | ||
Female | Ref. | - | - | 0.281 | Ref. | - | - | 0.001 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||||||
White | 2.696 | 1.407 | 5.166 | 1.408 | 0.704 | 2.814 | ||
African American | 1.992 | 0.829 | 4.783 | 1.415 | 0.547 | 3.661 | ||
Other | 6.015 | 2.326 | 15.555 | 2.994 | 0.999 | 8.969 | ||
Hispanic | Ref. | - | - | 0.002 | Ref. | - | - | 0.279 |
Parent education | ||||||||
HS or less | Ref. | - | - | Ref. | - | - | ||
Some college | 1.758 | 1.030 | 3.000 | 1.357 | 0.710 | 2.593 | ||
Bachelor’s or higher | 1.476 | 0.887 | 2.455 | 0.112 | 0.911 | 0.492 | 1.685 | 0.411 |
Parent employment | ||||||||
Not Working | 0.598 | 0.333 | 1.075 | 0.714 | 0.348 | 1.465 | ||
Working | Ref. | - | - | 0.086 | Ref. | - | - | 0.358 |
School (selected adolescent) | ||||||||
Middle School/Junior High | 0.681 | 0.426 | 1.091 | 0.239 | 0.101 | 0.564 | ||
High school | Ref. | - | - | 0.110 | Ref. | - | - | 0.001 |
Multinomial regression is based on 632 respondents as it excludes the 129 parents who answered that they did not feel screening should be done in school.
Discussion
A nationally representative sample of parents voiced strong support for school-based depression screening starting in middle school. Most supported screening beginning in 6th or 7th grade, i.e., eleven to twelve years-old, consistent with the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.7 Fathers were more likely to support screening starting in high school. Challenges with school mental health screenings include confidentiality and adequate resources to follow-up at-risk students.8 For example, while parents wish to be informed if their student is depressed, research has found confidentiality is a significant factor in adolescent willingness to disclose depressive symptoms.9 Additionally, nearly half of parents were unaware of available school mental health services. This suggests a lack in parent understanding of how schools will handle screening results and the availability of mental health resources, or perhaps highlights parent expectation to directly manage results.
This survey did not include non-English speaking parents. Non-responders may have differed from those who did respond, though participants are not made aware of the survey topics in advance, limiting the ability to select survey topics of interest.
Conclusions
Parents voiced strong support for school-based depression screening starting in middle school, suggesting the desire for further support in recognizing adolescent depression and the need for additional services that begin in the middle school years.
Implications and Contribution:
In a national survey, parents were very supportive of school-based depression screening starting in middle school, but overwhelmingly wished to be informed of a positive result. Adolescent confidentiality will need to be thoughtfully balanced with parent involvement.
Acknowledgements
Funding source:
Research reported in this publication was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®) Award (AD-2017C3-8752).The views presented in this publication are solely the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®), its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee.
Financial disclosure statement:
Dr. Sekhar reported receiving grants from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Pfizer through the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Highmark Foundation, owning stock in American Kidney Stone Management, having a statement of work from the Pennsylvania Department of Health for their Live Healthy PA website, receiving funding from the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute on a Community Engaged Research Fellowship, receiving funding through a Kohl’s Cares gift to Penn State for the development of school staff workshops, and serving as a coinvestigator on a charitable grant from the Acts of Random Kindness Foundation outside the submitted work. Dr. Waxmonsky reported receiving grants from HRSA, Pfizer and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, serving on the advisory boards of Purdue Pharma and NLS Pharma, and receiving support from the National Institute of Mental Health outside the submitted work. Dr. Kraschnewski reported receiving grants from HRSA, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Merck and Co, the National Institutes of Health, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Abbreviations:
- US
United States
- MDD
major depressive disorder
- RCT
randomized clinical trial
- NPCH
National Poll on Children’s Health
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest Statement: Potential conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
References
- 1.Healthy People.gov. Healthy People 2020 Objectives. Mental health and mental disorders. MHMD-4.1 Reduce the proportion of adolescents aged 12–17 years who experience major depressive episodes. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/data-search/Search-the-Data?nid=4813.AccessedFebruary 10, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parikh SV, Taubman DS, Antoun C, Cranford J, Foster CE, Grambeau M, Hunter J, Jester J, Konz K, Meyer T, Salazar S, Greden JF. The Michigan peer-to-peer depression awareness program: School-based prevention to address depression among teens. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69:487–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bhatta S, Champion JD, Young C, Loika E. Outcomes of Depression Screening Among Adolescents Accessing School-based Pediatric Primary Care Clinic Services. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018;38:8–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Law WC, McClanahan R, Weismuller PC. Depression screening in the school setting: Identification of the depressed adolescent. NASN Sch Nurse. 2017;32:364–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCormick E, Thompson K, Stoep AV, McCauley E. The case for school-based depression screening: Evidence from established programs. Rep Emot Behav Disord Youth. 2009;9:91–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sekhar DL, Pattison KL, Confair A, et al. Effectiveness of universal school-based screening vs. targeted screening for major depressive disorder among adolescents: A trial protocol for the screening in high schools to identify, evaluate, and lower depression (SHIELD) randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e1914427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Siu AL, United States Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression in children and adolescents: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:360–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vander Stoep A, McCauley E, Thompson KA, Herting JR, Kuo ES, Stewart DG, Anderson CA, Kushner S. Universal emotional health screening at the middle school transition. J Emot Behav Disord. 2005;13:213–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wisdom JP, Clarke GN, Green CA. What teens want: barriers to seeking care for depression. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006;33:133–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]