Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2021 Aug 25;6(4):e00695-21. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00695-21

Emergence of Plasmid-Mediated Resistance Genes tet(X) and mcr-1 in Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates from Pakistan

Ruichao Li a,b,, Mashkoor Mohsin c, Xiaoyu Lu a, Sabahat Abdullah c, Asim Munir c, Zhiqiang Wang a,
Editor: Patricia A Bradfordd
PMCID: PMC8386413  PMID: 34431695

ABSTRACT

The emergence of tet(X) represents a significant threat to human health. In this study, we aimed to investigate the genomic characterizations of tet(X)-positive clinical Escherichia coli isolates and provide genomic insight into the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in clinical settings. Four tet(X)-positive E. coli isolates, PK5074, PK5086, PK5095, and PK5097, from 100 human clinical isolates were identified by PCR and were resistant to tigecycline. tet(X) genes were in IncFII plasmids in 4 E. coli isolates. Worryingly, PK5074 also carried an mcr-1-bearing IncHI2 plasmid. Notably, a relatively high cotransfer frequency of tet(X) and mcr-1 in PK5074 was found. PK5086, PK5095, and PK5097 were categorized into sequence type 410 (ST410) and indicated clonal dissemination of tet(X)-positive strains in hospitals, but tet(X)-bearing plasmids in PK5086, PK5095, and PK5097 were nontransferable. We present the first report of clinical E. coli isolates harboring tet(X) in South Asia. Our results support the implication of humans as a potential reservoir for tet(X)-harboring E. coli. We provide insight into the dissemination of tet(X) and mcr-1 in a clinical setting and highlight the current transmission of both critical resistance genes globally.

IMPORTANCE Global transmission of plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance gene tet(X)-bearing Escherichia coli strains incurs a public health concern. However, the research focusing on the prevalence of tet(X)-positive isolates in clinical specimens is still rare, and to our knowledge, there is no such report from South Asia. Here, we characterized four E. coli clinical isolates harboring tet(X) of human origin in Pakistan and demonstrated clonal dissemination of tet(X)-positive isolates in hospitals. We report the emergence of an mcr-1-bearing IncHI2 plasmid together with a tet(X)-positive IncFII plasmid in one clinical isolate. Cotransfer of tet(X)- and mcr-1-carrying plasmids is worrying and warrants further investigations.

KEYWORDS: Escherichia coli, tet(X), mcr-1, plasmids, clinical settings

OBSERVATION

Tigecycline is used as the last-resort antibiotic to treat infections caused by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, particularly carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (1, 2). However, the emergence of the plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance gene tet(X4), the most prevalent tet(X) variant that confers high-level tigecycline resistance in Escherichia coli, represents significant threats to human health (3, 4). Recently, reports on tet(X) in Enterobacteriaceae isolates from humans have increased significantly, mainly from China and Singapore (4, 5). Here, we report the first identification of E. coli clinical isolates harboring tet(X) of human origin in Pakistan and characterize the genetic environment of tet(X). We also describe a relatively high cotransfer frequency of tet(X) and mcr-1 in clinical isolate PK5074, which highlights the current worldwide transmission of both critical resistance genes.

Among 100 human clinical isolates, four tet(X)-positive isolates (including PK5074, PK5086, and PK5097 from hospital A and PK5095 from hospital B) were acquired, and they were identified as E. coli (Table 1). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed that all 4 E. coli isolates conferred high-level resistance to tigecycline with the MICs ranging from 32 to 64 mg/liter. Worryingly, mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-1 was also detected in strain PK5074 (Table 2). MICs for PK5074 revealed that E. coli PK5074 exhibited resistance to tigecycline, colistin, kanamycin, doxycycline, ampicillin, enrofloxacin, streptomycin, amoxicillin, florfenicol, terramycin, and tetracycline (Table 1). PK5086, PK5095, and PK5097 exhibited the same resistance spectrum and were resistant to tigecycline, gentamicin, kanamycin, doxycycline, ampicillin, enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, streptomycin, amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, florfenicol, terramycin, and tetracycline (Table 1). Four tet(X)-positive isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. PCR and Sanger sequencing confirmed the tet(X) present in four strains was tet(X4), which is annotated as tet(X) in the following context.

TABLE 1.

MICs of four tet(X)-carrying clinical E. coli isolates investigated in this study

Strain ID Date of sampling (yr-mo-day) MICs (mg/liter)a
GEN KAN DOX AMP ENR CFF STR AMX RIF CEF FFC MEM CST TER TET TIG
PK5074 2019-12-17 1 >128 64 >128 64 1 128 >128 >512 ≤0.125 >128 ≤0.125 4 >128 128 64
PK5086 2019-12-23 >128 64 64 >128 >128 >128 >128 >128 8 >128 >128 ≤0.125 ≤0.125 >128 >128 32
PK5095 2020-03-01 128 128 64 >128 128 >128 >128 >128 8 >128 >128 ≤0.125 ≤0.125 >128 >128 32
PK5097 2020-07-01 128 64 64 >128 >128 >128 >128 >128 8 >128 >128 ≤0.125 0.25 >128 >128 32
ATCC 25922 0.25 2 0.5 4 ≤0.125 ≤0.125 4 4 4 ≤0.125 4 ≤0.125 0.25 4 0.5 ≤0.125
a

GEN, gentamicin; KAN, kanamycin; DOX, doxycycline; AMP, ampicillin; ENR, enrofloxacin; CFF, ceftiofur; STR, streptomycin; AMC, amoxicillin; RIF, rifampicin; CEF, ceftriaxone; FFC, florfenicol; MEM, meropenem; CST, colistin; TER, terramycin; TET, tetracycline; TIG, tigecycline.

TABLE 2.

Genomic information of the chromosomes and plasmids of E. coli PK5074 and PK5086 resolved by hybrid assembly strategy

Strain MLST Components Size (bp) Accession no. Replicon type(s) Resistance genes Virulence-associated gene(s)
PK5074 ST48 PK5074-chromosome 4,746,945 CP072802 mdf(A), dfrA1 gad, ompT, terC
pPK5074-MCR1 267,744 CP072803 IncHI2, IncHI2A mcr-1, aph(3′)-Ia, aadA8, lnu(F), sul3, tet(A), aph(6)-Id, floR, ARR-2, dfrA14 terC
pPK5074-tetX 110,313 CP072807 IncFII tet(X), aph(3′)-Ia, aph(6)-Id, aadA22, aph(3′')-Ib, sul2, floR, blaTEM-215 traT
pPK5074-91kb 91,224 CP072806 IncFIB(K) qnrS2, tet(A), floR, sul2, aph(6)-Id, aph(3′')-Ib NDa
pPK5074-69kb 69,302 CP072804 IncY qnrS1, aph(6)-Id, aph(3′')-Ib, aadA2, aph(3′)-Ia, blaTEM-1B, lnu(F) ND
pPK5074-2kb 1,943 CP072805 ColRNA1 None ND
PK5086 ST410 PK5086-chromosome 4,781,220 CP080370 mdf(A), blaCMY-2 gad, lpfA, terC
pPK5086-tetX 100,261 CP080371 IncFII tet(X), fosA4, mph(A), dfrA12, floR, blaTEM-215 traT
pPK5086-97kb 97,614 CP080372 IncFIB (AP001918), IncFIA, IncQ1, IncFII (pRSB107) aac(6′)-Ib-cr, aph(3′')-Ib, aph(6)-Id, aadA5, aac(3)-IId, mph(A), dfrA17, sul1, sul2, tet(B), blaTEM-1B, blaOXA-1, blaCTX-M-15 ND
pPK5086-95kb 95,348 CP080373 IncY None ND
pPK5086-2kb 2,088 CP080374 Col (BS512) None ND
a

ND, not detected.

To investigate the transferability of tet(X) or mcr-1, conjugation assays were performed. Resistance genes tet(X) and mcr-1 in strain PK5074, with corresponding resistance phenotypes for tigecycline and colistin, were able to successfully transfer from E. coli PK5074 into the recipient E. coli J53, suggesting that the tet(X) and mcr-1 genes were located in conjugative plasmids or other mobilizable genetic elements in PK5074. The tet(X)-positive genetic structure exhibited good transferability into E. coli J53 at a frequency of (4.34 ± 0.07) × 10−1 cells per recipient. Comparatively, the mcr-1-bearing genetic structure transferred with a frequency of (6.46 ± 0.82) × 10−6 cells per recipient. Cotransfer of tet(X) and mcr-1 was at a frequency of (6.18 ± 0.99) × 10−6 cells per recipient. However, tet(X) in strains PK5086, PK5095, and PK5097 was nontransferable.

All the 4 tet(X)-carrying isolates were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform generating 2 × 150-bp paired-end read data, and draft genome sequences were obtained successfully. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis provided comprehensive information for the tet(X)-carrying bacteria and their phylogenetic relationship. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis revealed that PK5074 positive for tet(X) and mcr-1 belonged to sequence type 48 (ST48), and tet(X)-bearing strains PK5086 and PK5095 along with PK5097 belonged to ST410. We further determined the clonal relationship of strains PK5086, PK5095, and PK5097 based on their single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the core genome. The numbers of differences in SNPs were only up to three between the three strains. In addition, PK5086, PK5095, and PK5097 contained identical antimicrobial resistance genes, insertion sequences, virulence-associated genes, and plasmid replicons (Fig. 1), indicating that clonal dissemination of tet(X)-positive strains existed in two different hospitals. Multiple antimicrobial resistance genes were identified in four isolates (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Distributions of antimicrobial resistance genes, insertion sequences, virulence-associated genes, and plasmid replicons in four tet(X)-bearing isolates. The color in figure legend indicates the percentage of sequence homology.

To learn the genetic contexts of tet(X), PK5074 coharboring tet(X) and mcr-1 and the representative PK5086 of the remaining three strains were sequenced with the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION long-read platform. PK5074 harbored a chromosome and five plasmids consisting of pPK5074-MCR1, pPK5074-tetX, pPK5074-91kb, pPK5074-69kb, and pPK5074-2kb (Table 2). The tet(X) gene was located on the IncFII plasmid pPK5074-tetX, which is an MDR plasmid coharboring aph(3′)-Ia, aph(6)-Id, aadA22, aph(3′')-Ib, sul2, floR, and blaTEM-215 genes (Table 2). pPK5074-MCR1 was a typical mcr-1-bearing IncHI2 plasmid carrying various resistance genes, including mcr-1, aph(3′)-Ia, aadA8, lnu(F), sul3, tet(A), aph(6)-Id, floR, arr-2, and dfrA14 dispersed among insertion sequences (Table 2). PK5086 contained a chromosome and four plasmids consisting of pPK5086-tetX, pPK5086-97kb, pPK5086-95kb, and pPK5086-2kb (Table 2). The tet(X) gene was in plasmid pPK5086-tetX, which is also an MDR IncFII plasmid cocarrying fosA4, mph(A), dfrA12, floR, and blaTEM-215.

BLASTn analysis of pPK5074-tetX and pPK5086-tetX against the NCBI nr database showed that they exhibited 99% identity at 78% coverage with plasmid 3 (LR130554) in E. coli MS14386 from a blood sample, and 97% identity at 64% coverage with plasmid pH1038-142 (KJ484634) in an E. coli isolate from a human (Fig. 2a). Plasmid 3 and pH1038-142 had plasmid backbone structures similar to those of pPK5074-tetX and pPK5086-tetX, but there was no MDR region including tet(X) in plasmid 3. The most obvious difference of pH1038-142, compared with pPK5074-tetX and pPK5086-tetX, was also an MDR region without tet(X) (Fig. 2a). This indicates that the formation of plasmid pPK5074-tetX and pPK5086-tetX may depend on the evolution of MDR regions. Two copies of ISCR2 were adjacent to tet(X) in pPK5074-tetX (Fig. 2a), which may play a role in facilitating the transmission of tet(X) (3, 4). In addition, two repeats of tet(X) were found in pPK5074-tetX, and the repeat structure was ISCR2-hp-abh-tet(X) in 4,608 bp, which was the reported tet(X)-bearing circular intermediate (3, 6). The circular intermediate may play an important role in the formation of tet(X)-bearing tandem repeat structures. pPK5074-MCR1 shared >98% coverage and >99% identity with plasmid pCFSA1096 (CP033347) in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica strain CFSA1096 of food origin in China and plasmid p2017_03_03CC (LC511658) in E. coli 2017.03.03CC isolate of human origin (Fig. 2b).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Sequence comparison of plasmids harboring mcr-1 and tet(X) with structurally similar plasmids available in NCBI database. (a) Circular comparison of the tet(X)-bearing IncFII plasmids, including pPK5074-tetX, pPK5086-tetX, and other IncFII plasmids in the NCBI nr database. The outermost circle indicate reference plasmid pPK5074-tetX with genes annotated. (b) Circular comparison between the mcr-1-bearing IncHI2 plasmid pPK5074-MCR1 and other IncHI2 plasmids in the NCBI nr database.

The isolate PK5074 belonged to the ST48 E. coli, which was linked to Shiga toxin-producing or extraintestinal pathogenic strains, and three mcr-1-carrying ST48 E. coli isolates were characterized as avian-pathogenic E. coli in Pakistan (79). Notably, ST48 strains were found to be a dominant host for the mcr-1-bearing IncX4 plasmid (10) and a host for the carbapenemase gene blaNDM occasionally (11, 12). However, the tet(X) gene has also begun to appear in ST48 E. coli isolates, and this should attract our attention. In E. coli PK5074, pPK5074-tetX and pPK5074-MCR1 were MDR plasmids harboring various insertion sequences, such as ISCR2 and IS26 (Fig. 2a and b). It has been reported that ISCR2 and IS26 may facilitate the construction of large fused MDR plasmids (6, 1315). Therefore, it is possible that the IncFII plasmid pPK5074-tetX and the IncHI2 plasmid pPK5074-MCR1 could form a recombinant plasmid carrying tet(X) and mcr-1 mediated by insertion sequences. This will accelerate the transmission of mcr-1 and tet(X), but the possibility warrants further investigations. In fact, the emergence of the plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance gene tet(X) in E. coli isolated from poultry, food, and the environment in South Asia was reported in May 2021, and tet(X)-bearing IncFII or IncQ1 plasmid was found to coexist with mcr-1-carrying IncI2 plasmid (16). In combination with this study, we speculate that more tet(X)- and mcr-1-coharboring isolates will appear in the region and constitute a potential public health concern.

In isolate PK5086, the tet(X)-carrying plasmid pPK5086-tetX was highly similar to pPK5074-tetX except for the MDR region, and pPK5086-tetX harbored the transfer elements (Fig. 2a), but they were unable to transfer into J53 by conjugation. Given the high potential of ST410 E. coli to acquire resistance to last-resort antimicrobials (17), the establishment of tet(X)-carrying ST410 E. coli in South Asia should arouse regional and global concerns, as resistance to last-resort antibiotics is already a major public health crisis in the region and worldwide.

To conclude, we report the first identification of E. coli clinical isolates harboring tet(X) and mcr-1 of human origin in Pakistan and report the cotransfer of mcr-1-bearing IncHI2 plasmid with tet(X)-positive plasmid in a clinical isolate. These findings indicate that mobile tigecycline and colistin resistance genes may disseminate in clinical settings in Pakistan and pose a serious global risk in clinical settings. It is recommended to strengthen the monitoring of the coexistence of mcr-1 and tet(X) to avoid the coming of the preantibiotic era.

Bacterial isolates and identification.

Between 2019 and 2020, a total of 100 human clinical isolates were screened for the presence of mobile tigecycline-resistant E. coli harboring tet(X) in Faisalabad, Pakistan. The human clinical E. coli isolates were collected from two tertiary care hospitals: 70 isolates were collected from hospital A and 30 isolates from hospital B. All isolates were cultivated on urinary tract infection (UTI) chrome agar supplemented with 2 mg/liter tigecycline and incubated overnight at 37°C for isolation of tigecycline-resistant E. coli strains. PCR was employed to screen the presence of tet(X) in tigecycline-resistant isolates using primers described earlier (3). mcr-1 was further identified in tet(X)-positive isolates (18). 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to confirm bacterial species.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

The MICs of gentamicin, kanamycin, doxycycline, ampicillin, enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, streptomycin, amoxicillin, rifampin, ceftriaxone, florfenicol, meropenem, colistin, terramycin, tetracycline, and tigecycline for all tet(X)-bearing isolates were determined by the broth microdilution method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (19) and were interpreted according to the CLSI standards (M100 and M31-A3) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/). Tigecycline and colistin were interpreted in accordance with the EUCAST guidelines (susceptible, ≤2 mg/liter; resistant, >2 mg/liter). E. coli ATCC 25922 served as the quality control strain.

Conjugation experiments.

To investigate the transferability of tet(X) and mcr-1, conjugation assays were performed using tet(X)-positive strains as donors and E. coli J53 (sodium azide resistant [Azir]) as the recipient. Bacterial strains were streaked onto LB agar plates, followed by inoculation into LB broth overnight. Cultures of donors and the recipient were mixed at 1:1, and then 0.1 ml of mixed culture was applied onto LB agar plates, followed by incubation at 37°C for 16 to 20 h. After incubation, we subsequently collected the mixed culture on LB agar plates and 10-fold serially diluted it in sterile saline. LB agar plates, supplemented with different antimicrobials, including tigecycline (2 mg/liter) and sodium azide (150 mg/liter), colistin (2 mg/liter) and sodium azide (150 mg/liter), and tigecycline in combination with colistin and sodium azide, were used to recover transconjugants [tet(X)-carrying, mcr-1-containing, and tet(X) and mcr-1 coharboring transconjugants]. The presence of tet(X) or/and mcr-1 genes in transconjugants was confirmed by PCR and antimicrobial susceptibility testing as described above. The frequency of conjugation transfer was calculated by the number of transconjugants per recipient as previously described (20).

WGS and bioinformatics analysis.

The genomic DNA of all tet(X)-positive isolates was extracted using the FastPure bacteria DNA isolation minikit (Vazyme, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Whole-genome sequencing was performed via an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform, and two representative isolates were further sequenced by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION platform. Short-read Illumina raw sequences were assembled using SPAdes (21). Illumina short-read and Nanopore long-read data were used to perform de novo assembly with Unicycler 0.4.4 (22, 23). The Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology annotation website server (https://rast.nmpdr.org/rast.cgi) was then used to annotate the genomes (24). Online tools, including PlasmidFinder 2.1 (25), ResFinder 4.1 (26), VirulenceFinder 2.0 (27), and MLST 2.0 (28), were utilized to assemble and characterize the genomes (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/). TBtools was used to visualize the distributions of antimicrobial resistance genes, insertion sequences, virulence-associated genes, and plasmid replicons (29). Comparisons of highly homologous complete plasmid sequences available in the NCBI database with plasmids in the study were performed with BRIG (30).

Data availability.

The nucleotide sequences of the chromosomes and plasmids of E. coli PK5074 and PK5086 have been deposited in the NCBI database with accession numbers CP072802 to CP072807 and CP080370 to CP080374, respectively (Table 2). The draft genomes of E. coli PK5095 and PK5097 were also deposited in NCBI (BioProject identifier [ID] PRJNA751691).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2020M671632), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31872523 and 31872526), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

We declare no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Ruichao Li, Email: rchl88@yzu.edu.cn.

Zhiqiang Wang, Email: zqwang@yzu.edu.cn.

Patricia A. Bradford, Antimicrobial Development Specialists, LLC

REFERENCES

  • 1.Seifert H, Blondeau J, Dowzicky MJ. 2018. In vitro activity of tigecycline and comparators (2014–2016) among key WHO 'priority pathogens' and longitudinal assessment (2004–2016) of antimicrobial resistance: a report from the T.E.S.T. study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52:474–484. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rodriguez-Bano J, Gutierrez-Gutierrez B, Machuca I, Pascual A. 2018. Treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-, AmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00079-17. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00079-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.He T, Wang R, Liu D, Walsh TR, Zhang R, Lv Y, Ke Y, Ji Q, Wei R, Liu Z, Shen Y, Wang G, Sun L, Lei L, Lv Z, Li Y, Pang M, Wang L, Sun Q, Fu Y, Song H, Hao Y, Shen Z, Wang S, Chen G, Wu C, Shen J, Wang Y. 2019. Emergence of plasmid-mediated high-level tigecycline resistance genes in animals and humans. Nat Microbiol 4:1450–1456. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0445-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sun J, Chen C, Cui CY, Zhang Y, Liu X, Cui ZH, Ma XY, Feng Y, Fang LX, Lian XL, Zhang RM, Tang YZ, Zhang KX, Liu HM, Zhuang ZH, Zhou SD, Lv JN, Du H, Huang B, Yu FY, Mathema B, Kreiswirth BN, Liao XP, Chen L, Liu YH. 2019. Plasmid-encoded tet(X) genes that confer high-level tigecycline resistance in Escherichia coli. Nat Microbiol 4:1457–1464. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0496-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ding Y, Saw WY, Tan LWL, Moong DKN, Nagarajan N, Teo YY, Seedorf H. 2020. Emergence of tigecycline- and eravacycline-resistant Tet(X4)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the gut microbiota of healthy Singaporeans. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3480–3484. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li R, Lu X, Peng K, Liu Z, Li Y, Liu Y, Xiao X, Wang Z. 2020. Deciphering the structural diversity and classification of the mobile tigecycline resistance gene tet(X)-bearing plasmidome among bacteria. mSystems 5:e00134-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00134-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Furlan JPR, Gallo IFL, de Campos A, Passaglia J, Falcao JP, Navarro A, Nakazato G, Stehling EG. 2019. Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli harboring antimicrobial resistance genes obtained from a farmhouse. Pathog Glob Health 113:268–274. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2019.1693712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhuge X, Jiang M, Tang F, Sun Y, Ji Y, Xue F, Ren J, Zhu W, Dai J. 2019. Avian-source mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli is phylogenetically diverse and shares virulence characteristics with E. coli causing human extra-intestinal infections. Vet Microbiol 239:108483. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Azam M, Mohsin M, Johnson TJ, Smith EA, Johnson A, Umair M, Saleemi MK, Sajjad Ur R. 2020. Genomic landscape of multi-drug resistant avian pathogenic Escherichia coli recovered from broilers. Vet Microbiol 247:108766. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang Y, Liu H, Wang Q, Du X, Yu Y, Jiang Y. 2020. Coexistence of blaKPC-2-IncN and mcr-1-IncX4 plasmids in a ST48 Escherichia coli strain in China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 23:149–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu Z, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Liu D, Shen Z, Zhang R, Yin W, Yao H, Li J, Shen J. 2017. Plasmid-mediated novel blaNDM-17 gene encoding a carbapenemase with enhanced activity in a sequence type 48 Escherichia coli strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02233-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02233-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu Z, Xiao X, Li Y, Liu Y, Li R, Wang Z. 2019. Emergence of IncX3 plasmid-harboring blaNDM-5 dominated by Escherichia coli ST48 in a goose farm in Jiangsu, China. Front Microbiol 10:2002. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li R, Lu X, Peng K, Liu Y, Xiao X, Wang Z. 2020. Reorganization of mcr-1-bearing large MDR plasmids resolved by nanopore sequencing. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:1645–1647. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.He S, Hickman AB, Varani AM, Siguier P, Chandler M, Dekker JP, Dyda F. 2015. Insertion sequence IS26 reorganizes plasmids in clinically isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria by replicative transposition. mBio 6:e00762. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00762-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.He D, Zhu Y, Li R, Pan Y, Liu J, Yuan L, Hu G. 2019. Emergence of a hybrid plasmid derived from IncN1-F33:A-:B- and mcr-1-bearing plasmids mediated by IS26. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:3184–3189. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mohsin M, Hassan B, Martins W, Li R, Abdullah S, Sands K, Walsh TR. 2021. Emergence of plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance tet(X4) gene in Escherichia coli isolated from poultry, food and the environment in South Asia. Sci Total Environ 787:147613. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nadimpalli ML, de Lauzanne A, Phe T, Borand L, Jacobs J, Fabre L, Naas T, Le Hello S, Stegger M. 2019. Escherichia coli ST410 among humans and the environment in Southeast Asia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 54:228–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rebelo AR, Bortolaia V, Kjeldgaard JS, Pedersen SK, Leekitcharoenphon P, Hansen IM, Guerra B, Malorny B, Borowiak M, Hammerl JA, Battisti A, Franco A, Alba P, Perrin-Guyomard A, Granier SA, De Frutos Escobar C, Malhotra-Kumar S, Villa L, Carattoli A, Hendriksen RS. 2018. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Euro Surveill 23:17-00672. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.6.17-00672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.CLSI. 2018. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 28th ed. CLSI supplement M100. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu W, Clark N, Patel JB. 2013. pSK41-like plasmid is necessary for Inc18-like vanA plasmid transfer from Enterococcus faecalis to Staphylococcus aureus in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:212–219. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01587-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li R, Xie M, Dong N, Lin D, Yang X, Wong MHY, Chan EW, Chen S. 2018. Efficient generation of complete sequences of MDR-encoding plasmids by rapid assembly of MinION barcoding sequencing data. Gigascience 7:1–9. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carattoli A, Zankari E, Garcia-Fernandez A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Moller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, Fagelhauer L, Chakraborty T, Neumann B, Werner G, Bender JK, Stingl K, Nguyen M, Coppens J, Xavier BB, Malhotra-Kumar S, Westh H, Pinholt M, Anjum MF, Duggett NA, Kempf I, Nykasenoja S, Olkkola S, Wieczorek K, Amaro A, Clemente L, Mossong J, Losch S, Ragimbeau C, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. 2020. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. 2020. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. 2011. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The nucleotide sequences of the chromosomes and plasmids of E. coli PK5074 and PK5086 have been deposited in the NCBI database with accession numbers CP072802 to CP072807 and CP080370 to CP080374, respectively (Table 2). The draft genomes of E. coli PK5095 and PK5097 were also deposited in NCBI (BioProject identifier [ID] PRJNA751691).


Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES