Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0255746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255746

Suicidal ideation and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Jimma medical center, Ethiopia

Tamrat Anbesaw 1,*, Alemayehu Negash 2, Almaz Mamaru 3, Habtamu Abebe 4, Asmare Belete 1, Getinet Ayano 5,6
Editor: Russell Kabir7
PMCID: PMC8386870  PMID: 34432799

Abstract

Background

Suicidal ideation (SI) among pregnant women is a major public health concern worldwide and is associated with a higher risk of completed suicide. However, there are limited studies that determined the prevalence and the potential determinants of suicidal ideation in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the prevalence of suicidal ideation and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Jimma, Ethiopia.

Methods

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 423 pregnant women attending Jimma medical center in Southwest, Ethiopia. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Suicidal ideation assessed using the Suicidality Module of the World Mental Health survey initiative version of the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Other tools used are EPDS, Abuse Assessment Scale (AAS), DASS -21, PSS, Maternity Social Support Scale (MSSS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore the potential determinants of suicidal ideation among the participants.

Result

The prevalence of SI among women who are on antenatal care was found to be 13.3% (95% CI (10.1,16.4). In multivariable analysis, marital status with lack of cohabiting partners (AOR = 2.80,95%CI:1.23,6.37), history of abortion (AOR = 2.45,95% CI:1.03,5.93), having depression (AOR = 4.28,95% CI:1.75,10.44),anxiety(AOR = 2.99,95% CI:1.24,7.20), poor sleep quality (AOR = 2.85,95% CI:1.19,6.79), stress (AOR = 2.50, 95% CI:1.01,5.67), and intimate partner violence (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI:1.07,5.47) were found to be significant predictors of suicidal ideation.

Conclusion

The prevalence of SI among pregnant women was found to be huge. Lack of cohabiting partners, previous history of abortion, depression, anxiety, intimate partner violence, poor sleep quality, and stress were variables that are independent predictors of suicidal ideation. Screening and interventions of antenatal SI are needed.

Background

Suicide is a fatal act of terminating one’s own life [1]. Suicidal ideation (SI) is a thought about one’s serving as an agent to kill him/her and an important predictor of later suicide attempts and completions [2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report, every year over 16,000,000 people attempt suicide, and 800,000 people die by suicide worldwide [3]. Worldwide, suicide ranked the 14th leading cause of mortality and morbidity. By the year 2030, it is expected to increase by 50%, becoming the 12th leading cause of death [4]. Globally, it is the major public health issue that is ranking the second cause of death for women ages between 15–29 [5], and the leading possible cause of death among pregnant mothers [6].

Pregnancy is mostly a sensitive time for women, being frequently both physically and mentally distressing. Currently, suicide is recognized as one of the major reasons for the death of women in middle-income and low-income countries [7]. Epidemiological evidence shows that SI among pregnant women is more common and higher than in the general population. Studies indicated that the estimated prevalence of SI among pregnant women ranges from 13.1% to 33% [8]. Antenatal SI has been often linked with an increased risk of subsequent suicidal attempts and death from suicide [6]. In Canada, during pregnancy 5% of women died due to suicide by using the means of committing suicide such as hanging and jumping from a high place [9].

In Africa, the estimated prevalence of SI among pregnant women ranged between 12–21% [10, 11]. Pregnancy helps women to have regular health services which is the golden chance for healthcare providers to intervene quickly if the prevalence of suicide is well understood [12]. However, efforts to study suicide in pregnancy have been hindered by social stigma and practical restrictions including inadequate data sources picking pregnancy and delivery status of patients with suicidal behavior [12].

SI among the pregnant population is associated with numerous consequences that adversely affected maternal and infant outcomes including fetal growth restriction, premature labor, cesarean delivery, respiratory distress, depression, and addicted alcohol [1315].

There are several risk factors for maternal suicidal behavior during the perinatal period. Some of the risk factors that exacerbate suicidal ideation women who are being unmarried, lack of support, comorbid mental illnesses, have low educational attainment, unemployment, unplanned pregnancy, history of childhood abuse, intimate partner violence, and preexisting vulnerability such as, a family history of suicide, impulsivity, and previous and/or current psychiatric diagnoses including depression [8, 14, 1618].

Despite this burden and consequences, in low and middle-income countries, there is a limited study on the prevalence of suicidality among pregnant women. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies in Ethiopia on the subject. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of suicidal ideation and identify the associated factors among pregnant women to fill the existing gap in the literature.

Methods and materials

Study area, design, and period

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in August 2020 at Jimma medical center, which is geographically located in the city of Jimma that is situated 352 km from Addis Ababa to the southwest part of Ethiopia. The center delivers service to the catchment population of about 15 million people. The ANC clinic provided services for a total of approximately 9850 women every year by many professionals including specialists, residents, general practitioners, midwives, and nurses [19].

Source population

All pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma Medical Center.

Study population

All pregnant women attending antenatal units were available during the study period.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

All pregnant women age 18 and above, who had gestation age 30 days and above.

Exclusion criteria

Pregnant women who were critically ill and difficult to communicate.

Sampling procedure and sampling techniques

Sample size estimation

A single population proportion formula was used to estimate the sample size. Sample size with z-value of 1.96 and marginal error of 5% sample was calculated as:-

n=(Zα/2)2P(1P)d2

Where n = initial sample size a = confidence interval (95%) p = proportion of = 0.5

d = marginal error of 5% (z α/2)2 = 1.96

n=1.962x(0.5(10.5)=384(0.052)

Considering a 10% non-response rate a total sample of 423 pregnant women were included in the study.

Sampling procedure

A systematic sampling technique was used to recruit participants. The sampling interval was determined by dividing the total population who had follow up during a month of data collection period in OPDs of the JMC ANC unit by the sample size. Selection skip interval was, by taking total pregnant women of 848 (N) per and sample size (n) 423=Nn,k=848423=2.01=2, so the participants were selected every 2nd interval, the first woman was selected from the first two by lottery method who had to follow up during the data collection period.

Data collection method and tools

A semi-structured questionnaire was used which has different subunits, questionnaires to assess socio-demographic factors, obstetrical factors, clinical factors, psychosocial factors, and substance use factors.

Symptoms of maternal depression were assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) [20]. EPDS is a common tool for screening depressive symptomatology; initially, for use during the postnatal periods, it is also additionally validated for use during the perinatal periods in different countries and settings [2123]. It was also validated among the perinatal population in Ethiopia [24]. It consists of 10 items questions that examine emotional state happening for at least the past 7 days. Each question score has four possible answers with an interval of 0–3. The maximum score is 30. To consider most seriously depressed women, similar to the previous study, if the score is 13 and above is used to recognize probable cases [20, 25]

Anxiety was assessed using the anxiety subscale adapted from the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS -21). Each item contributes 0 to 3 points to the total score resulting in a total score that intervals from 0 to 21 and the score 8 and above was considered as having anxiety [26]. The IPV was assessed using the Abuse Assessment Scale (AAS). It is the most widely used tool to assess abuse among pregnant mothers in clinical settings. Women who gave responses yes to questions 2,3 or 4 were considered as having abuse [27].

The childhood physical and sexual abuse questionnaire was used to assess information regarding participants’ experiences with physical and sexual abuse in childhood happening earlier than the age of 18 years [28].

Stress was assessed by the perceived stress scale (PSS). The PSS has 10 items multiple-choice self-report psychological instruments for measuring the perception of stress. Each item contributes 0 to 4 points to the total score resulting in a total score that intervals from 0 to 40, a higher score indicating greater perceived stress occurring one month before the interview [29]. In Ethiopia which also used to assess stress among pregnant women, teachers, and students [3032].

Social support exploring family support, relationship with friends, partner/spouse help, conflict with spouse/partner, control feeling by spouse and, feeling unloved by spouse /partner during pregnancy, strengthening was assessed by the Maternity Social Support Scale (MSSS). It has three categories; low social support (less than 18), medium social support (18–23), and high social support (for scores 24–30) [33].

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was assessed sleep quality during pregnancy [34]. The PSQI contains 19 items which are categorized into seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component scores ranging from 0 to 3 and then getting a global score with an interval from 0–21. A global score greater than 5 showed poor sleep quality and scores equal to or less than 5 are measured as good quality sleep. This yields sensitivity and a specificity of 89.6% and 86.5% respectively [34].

The suicidality module of the World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI) was used to assess suicidal ideation [35]. Which was also used to assess suicide among patients with Tuberculosis, Epilepsy, and HIV/AIDS [3639]. In Ethiopia in which its Amharic version is validated Ethiopia both in clinical and community settings [40, 41].

Substance use was assessed by the WHO student drug-use questionnaire [42]. The presence of a known chronic medical such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension or others, family mental illness, family history of suicidal attempt was assessed by self-report (yes/ no response).

Data collection procedure

Five BSc psychiatry professionals and one supervisor from the 1st year postgraduate student in psychiatry were trained on how to collect data. Each section of questionnaires was prepared in English and then translated into the local language Amharic and Afan Oromo, and back-translated to English by an independent person to ensure its understandability and consistency. A two days training of supervisor and data collectors was given on the purpose of the study, tools, how to collect data, sampling techniques, how to keep confidentiality, and how to handle ethical issues was discussed with the data collectors. The pre-test was conducted among 21 (5%) of the sample size pregnant women in Agaro General Hospital formerly the main study was done to recognize impending problems in the proposed study such as data collection tools and to check the performance of the data collectors. Regular supervision by the supervisor and principal investigator was made to ensure that all necessary data was appropriately collected. Each day throughout data collection completed questionnaires were checked for completeness and consistency. The collected data were edited and entered into the computer from a paper then checked twice and processed timely.

Data processing and analysis

The data were entered into the Epi-Data version 3.1, and then data was exported to SPSS 25.0 version for cleaning and analysis. Descriptive statistics including frequencies, percentages, and summary statistics (mean values, and standard deviations) were calculated to define the study population about relevant variables. The bivariate logistic analysis was done to select candidate variables. All variables p-value < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were entered into the multivariable logistic regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to control for possible confounding effects and to determine the presence of a statistically significant association between independent variables and outcome variables. The model of fitness was checked by Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and the strength of the association was presented by an odds ratio of 95% C.I.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Before the study begins ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review committee of Jimma University. Then data collection was initiated after a letter of the corporation that is obtained from the above responsible office. Official permission was secured from JMC and the ANC unit coordinator. Written Informed consent was taken from each of the pregnant women and the information from individual mothers was kept confidential, their identity was not shown and there was no dissemination of the information without the respondent’s permission. The data given by the participants was used only for research purposes. We prepared a private room for an interview; those women who reported suicidal thoughts or attempted and depression were immediately referred to mental health facilities (emergency) for further evaluation and management. Interviewers were trained to link participants found to be in physically risky conditions and/or in immediate need of counseling to psychologists and psychiatrists.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

A total of 415 participants were included in the study, which resulted in an overall response rate of 98.1%. The mean age (± SD) of the respondents was 25.22(±4.62), with an age range of 18–38 years. Of all respondents, the majority were age range of 20–24 years 164(39.5%). About one-half (51.8%) of participants were Muslim religious followers. About three fourth of the participants (75.4%) were married and 251(60.5%) were Oromo in their ethnicity. The educational status of participants showed that 136(32.8%) of them attended college and above. Regarding occupational status, 163(39.3%) were housewives. Large numbers of respondents were urban residents 320(77.1%). The majority 268 (64.6%) of study participants had an average monthly income below 2166 Ethiopian birr (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma medical center, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 415).

Variables Categories Frequency(n = 415) Percent (%)
Age 18–19 36 8.7
20–24 164 39.5
25–29 128 30.8
30–34 73 17.6
> = 35 14 3.4
Religion Muslim 215 51.8
Orthodox 113 27.2
Protestant 81 19.5
Others* 6 1.5
Marital status Married 313 75.4
Single 74 17.8
Divorced 23 5.5
Widowed 5 1.3
Ethnicity Oromo 251 60.5
Amhara 69 16.6
Yeme 35 8.4
Keffa 29 7.0
Gurage 20 4.8
Others** 11 2.7
Education status Have no formal education 32 7.7
Primary 120 28.9
Secondary 127 30.6
College and above 136 32.8
Occupational status Government employed 88 21.2
Merchant 38 9.2
Farming 14 3.4
Student 67 16.1
Housewife 163 39.3
Private employed 45 10.8
Residence Urban 320 77.1
Rural 95 22.9
Average monthly income (Eth. Birr) <2166 268 64.6
> = 2166 147 35.4

Others

*Adventist &Catholic

**Tigre, Wolyita & Dawro

Obstetrics related characteristic of the participants

Nearly half of the study participants (47.0%) were in third-trimester pregnancy followed by first trimester 112 (27%) in their gestational age. Approximately two-thirds 269 (64.8%) and three fourth 308 (74.2%) of the respondents were multigravida and multipara respectively. Out of the total participants, 84 (20.2%) women had a previous history of abortion, and 64 (15.4%) had abortion intentions in the current pregnancy. More than two-thirds of 282(68.0%) of the women had a planned pregnancy (Table 2).

Table 2. Description of obstetrics-related factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma medical center, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 415).

Variables Categories Frequency(n = 415) Percent (%)
Pregnancy by trimester First trimester 112 27.0
Second trimester 108 26.0
Third trimester 195 47.0
Gravidity Primigravida 146 35.2
Multigravida 269 64.8
Parity Nullipara 107 25.8
Multipara 308 74.2
History of abortion Yes 84 20.2
No 331 79.8
Abortion intention in the current pregnancy Yes 20 4.8
No 395 95.2
Current pregnancy status planned No 133 32
Yes 282 68

Clinical and substance-related factors of the participants

According to this study finding, 21(5.1%) of respondents had a history of mental illness. Among participants, 43(10.4%) of respondents had a family history of mental illness and 40(9.6%) participants reported a family history of suicidal attempts. From respondents, 23(5.5%) women had a comorbid medical illness, from these medical illnesses, HIV/AIDS 4(1%), asthma 5(1.2%), diabetes 6(1.4%), and hypertension 8(1.9%) were reported. Of the participants, 114(27.5%) and 141(34.0%) had depression and anxiety symptoms respectively. Regarding sleep quality, (30.8%) of the respondents had reported poor sleep quality (Table 3).

Table 3. Description of clinical related factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma medical center, Jimma, Southwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 415).

Variables Categories Frequency(n = 415) Percent (%)
Past mental illness history Yes 21 5.1
No 394 94.9
Family history of mental illness Yes 43 10.4
No 372 89.6
Family history of suicidal attempt Yes 40 9.6
No 375 90.4
Chronic medical illness Yes 23 5.5
No 392 94.5
HIV/AIDS Yes 4 1.0
No 411 99.0
Asthma Yes 5 1.2
No 410 98.8
Diabetes Yes 6 1.4
No 409 98.6
Hypertension Yes 8 1.9
No 407 98.1
Depression Yes 114 27.5
No 301 72.5
Anxiety Yes 141 34.0
No 274 66.0
Sleep quality Poor 128 30.8
Good 287 69.2

Regarding the current use of the substance, 35(8.4%) of the respondents had a history of substance use within the past three months before data collection time. Among users majority of them, 19(4.6%) used alcohol, 13(3.1%) of the respondents were chewing khat and 3(0.7%) were smoking a cigarette within the past three months (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Ever and current substance use among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma medical center, Jimma, Southwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 415).

Fig 1

Psychosocial factors of the participants

From the total of the participants, 94(22.7%) of the respondents had experienced recent violence from their intimate partner and 65(15.7%) of the women had reported a history of childhood abuse. About one-third (34.7) of the respondents had stress during pregnancy. Regarding social support, more than half (53.3%), 141(34.0%), and 53 (12.8%) of the pregnant women had received medium social support, high social support, and poor social support respectively (Table 4).

Table 4. Psychosocial factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma medical center, Jimma, Southwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 415).

Variables Categories Frequency(n = 415) Percent (%)
Intimate partner violence Yes 94 22.7
No 321 77.3
Childhood abuse Yes 65 15.7
No 350 84.3
Stress Yes 144 34.7
No 271 65.3
Social support Low social support 53 12.8
Medium social support 221 53.2
High social support 141 34.0

The magnitude of suicidal ideation among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma, Ethiopia, 2020(n = 415)

In the present study, the prevalence of suicidal ideation among pregnant women was 13.3% (95%CI:10.1–16.4) (Table 5).

Table 5. Distribution of suicidal ideation and attempt among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma medical center, Jimma, Southwest, Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 415).
Variables Categories Frequency(n = 415) Percent (%)
Ever suicidal ideation Yes 78 18.8
No 337 81.2
Suicidal ideation in 1 month Yes 55 13.3
No 360 86.7
Ever plan of suicide Yes 31 7.5
No 384 92.5
Ever suicide attempt Yes 30 7.2
No 385 92.8
Suicidal attempt in 1 month Yes 12 2.9
No 403 97.1
Frequency of suicide in 1 month Once 8 66.7
Twice 3 25
More than twice 1 8.3
Reason for 1-month suicidal attempt Family conflict 5 41.7
Death in family 2 16.7
Financial constraint 3 25
Relationship problems 2 16.6
Severity related to 1-month attempt Seriously attempted 6 50
Ineffective method 4 33.3
To seek help 2 16.7
Methods of 1-month attempt Poisoning 8 66.7
Hanging 3 25
Sharp tools 1 8.3

Factors associated with suicidal ideation among pregnant women

In the bivariate analysis, marital status, income, parity, educational status, history of abortion, unplanned pregnancy, family history of mental illness, family history of suicidal attempt, depression, anxiety, poor sleep quality, stress, intimate partner violence, and social support showed a p-value of <0.25 and became a candidate for multivariable analysis. In multivariable binary logistic regression variables; marital status, depression, anxiety, history of abortion, sleep quality, stress, and intimate partner violence were found to be statistically associated with suicidal ideation at a p-value less than 0.05.

The odds of suicidal ideation among participants with the marital status category of (single, widowed, divorced) was 2.8 times higher as compared to married women [AOR = 2.80;95% CI (1.23,6.37)]. Those pregnant women who had a previous history of abortion were 2.45 times more likely to have suicidal ideation as compared with respondents who did not have a history of abortion [AOR = 2.45;95%CI(1.03,5.93)].

Those women with depression were about 4 times more likely to have suicidal ideation than their counterparts [AOR = 4.28;95%CI (1.75,10.44)]. Regarding anxiety, the participants with anxiety were about 3 times more likely to have suicidal ideation than their counterparts [AOR = 2.99; 95%CI (1.24,7.20)]. Likewise, participants with poor subjective sleep quality were 2.85 times more likely to have suicidal ideation as compared with women who had good sleep quality [AOR = 2.85; 95%CI (1.19, 6.79)].

Furthermore, the odds of having suicidal ideation among women who had stress was about 2.50 times higher as compared with the referent groups [AOR = 2.50;95%CI(1.01,5.67)]. Finally, pregnant mothers who reported violence from an intimate partner were 2.43 times more likely to have suicidal ideation as compared with those who did not experience Intimate partner violence [AOR = 2.43; 95%CI (1.07, 5.47)] (Table 6).

Table 6. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis results of suicidal ideation among pregnant women attending ANC at JMC, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia, 2020 (N = 415).

Variables Category Suicidal ideation COR(95%C.I) AOR(95%C.I) P-values
Yes (%) No (%)
Marital status Lack of cohabit partner 33(32.4%) 69(67.6%) 6.33(3.47,11.53) 2.80(1.23,6.37) 0.014 *
Married 22(7.0%) 291(93%) 1 1
Income (Ethio birr) <2166 40(14.9%) 228(85.1%) 1.54(0.82. 2.90) 0.52(0.21,1.30) 0.162
> = 2166 15(10.2%) 132(89.8%) 1
Educational status No formal education 4(12.5%) 28(87.5%) 1.35(0.41,4.45) 0.63(0.125,3.20) 0.58
Primary 14(11.7%) 106(88.3%) 1.25(0.56, 2.77) 0.75(0.24,2.36) 0.62
Secondary 24(18.9%) 103(81.1%) 2.20(1.07, 4.54) 1.74(0.60,5.02) 0.31
College and above 13(9.6%) 123(90.4%) 1 1
Parity Null 28(26.2%) 79(73.8%) 3.69(2.07,6.62) 1 0.052
One or more 27(8.8%) 281(91.2%) 1 2.26(0.99,5.16)
History of abortion Yes 27(32.1%) 57(67.9%) 5.13(2.81, 9.34) 2.45(1.03,5.93) 0.042 *
No 28(8.5%) 303(91.5%) 1
Current pregnancy planned No 29(21.8%) 104(78.2%) 2.74(1.54, 4.90) 1 0.12
Yes 26(9.2%) 256(90.8%) 1 1.91(0.84,4.32)
Family history of mental illness Yes 13(30.2%) 30 (69.8%) 3.41(1.65,7.03) 0.98(0.29,3.25) 0.97
No 42(11.3%) 330(88.7) 1
Family history of suicidal attempt Yes 9(22.5%) 31(77.5%) 2.07(0.93,4.64) 0.37(0.11,1.31) 0.12
No 46(12.3%) 329(87.7%) 1
Depression Yes 45(39.5%) 69(60.5%) 18.98(9.11,39.53) 4.28(1.75,10.44) 0.001 *
No 10(3.3%) 291(96.7%) 1
Anxiety Yes 43(30.5%) 98(69.5%) 9.58(4.85,18.92) 2.99(1.24,7.20) 0.015 *
No 12(4.4%) 262(95.6%) 1
Sleep quality Poor 42(32.8%) 86(67.2%) 10.29(5.28,20.06) 2.85(1.19,6.79) 0.018 *
Good 13(4.5%) 274(95.5%) 1
Stress Yes 36(25.0%) 108(75.0%) 4.42(2.43, 8.05) 2.50(1.01,5.67) 0.03 *
No 19(7.0%) 252(93.0%) 1
Intimate partner violence Yes 35 (37.2%) 59(62.8%) 8.93(4.82, 16.53) 2.43(1.07,5.47) 0.033 *
No 20(6.2%) 301(93.8%) 1
Social support Low social support 19(35.8%) 34(64.2%) 7.32(3.11,17.19) 1.09 (0.56,2.11) 0.80
Medium social support 26(11.8%) 195(88.2%) 1.75(0.815,3.74) 1.08(0.56,2.12) 0.81
High social support 10(7.1%) 131(92.9%) 1 1

*Statistically significant at P-value < 0.05, AOR, Adjusted odds Ratio, 1 = reference category, Chi square = 8.8, Hosmer Lemeshow goodness-of-fit 0.52, degrees of freedom = 7, Maximum VIF = 1.49.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to determine the prevalence and associated factors of suicidal ideation among pregnant women in Ethiopia. The result indicated that the magnitude of suicidal ideation during the current pregnancy was 13.3% [(95% CI, 10.1–16.4)]. This result was comparable with other findings done in Brazil 10.3% [43], Pakistani 11% [44], South Africa (12%) [10], and Southern Brazil 13.3% [45]. On the other hand, this study finding was higher when compared with a study done in Brazil 8.1% [46], Peru 8.8% [47], Brazil 6.3% [48], the USA 4.6% [49], and India 7.6% [50]. The discrepancy might be due to the study setting and inclusion criteria. For example, in India, a study was conducted on urban setting pregnant women only who were between 5 and 20 weeks of pregnancy while the current study was done on rural and urban and pregnant women at all trimesters of gestation [50]. The difference in assessment tool might be another possible reason, suicidal ideation assessed using the 10th item of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) which evaluated for a week of duration only in Brazil [46]. Another discrepancy might be due to the difference in study design, study setting, sample size, social support practice, and sampling technique, the socio-demographic and cultural context of the women.

However, in some other studies, the proportion of suicidal ideation was higher than the current study, a study conducted in Brazil 23.53% [51], Egypt 20.4% [11], and Peru 16.8% [52]. This variation might be due to the screening tool difference in which a previous study MINI was used in Brazil [51] and Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) in Egypt [11], whereas in this study CIDI was used [35]. Also, sample size difference might be another possible reason for their incongruence in Peru which was 641 study participants included [52]. Another possible reason might be the difference in participants who had different socio-economic and demographic characteristics in the populations.

Regarding the associated factors, in this study, marital status categories with a lack of cohabiting partners (single, divorced, and widowed) were nearly three times more likely to have suicidal ideation during the pregnancy period as compared to married women. This finding was in agreement with different studies in the USA [8, 18] and Brazil [46, 48, 53]. The reason might be due to the lower level of perceived social and emotional support from families and intimate partners. Another possible reason might be due to the socio-cultural value in the communities, some communities give high value to married ones. Moreover, this condition can directly affect women’s mental health particularly during pregnancy [10].

In the current study, we found that women who had depression were 4 times more likely to have suicidal ideation than undepressed participants. Similar to a finding of different studies from the USA [8, 14, 18, 52], two studies from Brazil [46, 53], India [50] as well as in Egypt [11] support this finding; we also observed a strong association between antenatal depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. The possible reason might be the presence of hormonal changes during pregnancy could be a risk for depression. Besides that depression decreases the level of the neurotransmitter serotonin, in which studies had shown an association between decreased level of serotonin and suicidal behavior [54]. It may also be due to the direct effect of depression which makes individuals feel hopeless, isolated, and worthless.

This finding also revealed that pregnant women with anxiety were three times more likely to have suicidal ideation than their counterparts. This was supported by the study conducted in the USA [8], Pakistani [44], South Africa [10], and Egypt [11]. Pregnancy is a more sensitive period for women and becomes distressing either physically or mentally. Pregnancy and previous experience of birth can situate women into conditions outside their comfort zones, which also cause anxiety; anxious concern will be about the health of their baby, fear of experiencing give birth or worry about weight gain, body shape, and being a responsible parent. Therefore the anxiety might be a potential cause that leads to suicidal behaviors [55].

The current study also showed that women who had experienced intimate partner violence were 2.43 times more likely to have suicidal ideation as compared to those women who didn’t experience intimate partner violence. The finding was consistent with a study conducted in the U.S [18], Brazil [45], India [50], Pakistani [44], and South Africa [10]. These studies support the association between IPV and suicidal ideation. This might be because IPV creates insecure relationships with their intimates and which also contributes to the development of SI [10]. Nevertheless, one study from the USA contradicts our finding, in which IPV was not significantly associated with suicidal ideation. The possible reason could be, in this study 69 (3.2%) of women experienced IPV from a total of 2159 participants, besides in the US, abusers made seriously asked and penalized by law. Whereas, in our study 415 samples were included; 94 (22.7%) experienced intimate partner violence [14].

Another predictor for antenatal suicidal ideation was the history of abortion those pregnant women who had a previous history of abortion were 2.45 times more likely to have suicidal ideation as compared with respondents who do not have a history of abortion. A current study finding was congruent with a finding from Southern Brazil [45]. This might be due to experiencing abortion could result in stressful situations that impose them to suicidal thoughts.

We also found that women who had poor subjective sleep quality were about three times more likely to have suicidal ideation as compared with those women who had good sleep quality. This was compatible with a study report from Brazil [53] and two studies from Peru [52, 56] that showed that poor sleep quality was significantly associated with women who had suicidal ideation. However, during pregnancy, there is a hormonal change, which usually potentially causes sleep alteration. Scholars also assessed sleep quality and its relationship with suicidal ideation during pregnancy; those who didn’t get well sleep were more likely to have suicidal thoughts [52].

The odds of having suicidal ideation among women who had stress was about 2.50 times higher when compared with the referent groups. This was congruent with the study done in the USA that showed that perceived stress had been strongly associated with prenatal suicidal ideation [14]. Women who had experienced stress during pregnancy lead to changes in their mood, feeling of loss of control, and being frightened about the future. During this time of fear, women considered suicide as a way to escape from stressors [57].

The limitation of the study might be emanated from the tools used are not culturally validated. This might bring a difference in the study findings.

Conclusion

Our study found that the prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempt among pregnant women was high. Lack of cohabiting partners, depression, anxiety, poor sleep quality, history of abortion, intimate partner violence, and stress were variables which are independent predictors of suicidal ideation among pregnant women. Screening and interventions of antenatal SI are warranted.

Supporting information

S1 File. Minimal data set.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere thanks to Wollo University, Jimma University, Jimma Medical Center, study participants, data collectors, and supervisors. I would like to say thank you, Alemayehu Molla.

Abbreviations

AAS

Abuse Assessment Screen

AIDS

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

AKUADS

Aga Khan University Anxiety and Depression Scale

ANC

Antenatal Care

CI

Confidence Interval

CIDI

Composite International Diagnostic Interview

EPDS

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

Epi-Data

Epidemiological Data

IPV

Intimate Partner Violence

JMC

Jimma Medical Center

MDD

Major Depressive Disorder

MINI

Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview

OR

Odds Ratio

SI

Suicidal Ideation

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Science

US

United States

WHO

World Health Organization

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Jimma University. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Rofman ES. Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70: 940. doi: 10.4088/jcp.09bk05044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Suicidal Behaviors. APA Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Comprehensive Guidelines and Guideline Watches. 2007. doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890423363.56008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Reid WH. Preventing suicide. Journal of Psychiatric Practice. 2010. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000369973.10650.13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mathers CD, Loncar D. 2005-Updated_projections_of_global_mortality_and_burden_of_disease_2002–2030_data_sources_methods_and_results. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mendez-Bustos P, Lopez-Castroman J, Baca-García E, Ceverino A. Life cycle and suicidal behavior among women. Sci World J. 2013;2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/485851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Oates M. Suicide: the leading cause of maternal death. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183: 279–281. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.4.279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vijayakumar L. Suicide in women. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015;57: 233–238. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.161484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Newport DJ, Levey LC, Pennell PB, Ragan K, Stowe ZN. Suicidal ideation in pregnancy: Assessment and clinical implications. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2007;10: 181–187. doi: 10.1007/s00737-007-0192-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nisa L, Giger R. Practice Clinical images—Lingua plicata. Cmaj. 2012;184: 2012. doi: 10.1503/cmaj [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Onah MN, Field S, Bantjes J, Honikman S. Perinatal suicidal ideation and behaviour: psychiatry and adversity. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017;20: 321–331. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0706-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moustafa M, Youssef U, Sleem N, Mohamed El- Hanafy R. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Suicide Among Pregnant Women At Zagazig University Hospitals. Zagazig Univ Med J. 2019;25: 216–226. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2019.26922 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gold KJ, Singh V, Marcus SM, Palladino CL. Mental health, substance use and intimate partner problems among pregnant and postpartum suicide victims in the National Violent Death Reporting System. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012;34: 139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.09.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jo Kim J, La Porte LM, Saleh MP, Allweiss S, Adams MG, Zhou Y, et al. Suicide risk among perinatal women who report thoughts of self-harm on depression screens. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125: 885–893. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gavin AR, Tabb KM, Melville JL, Guo Y, Katon W. Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation during pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011;14: 239–246. doi: 10.1007/s00737-011-0207-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gandhi SG, Gilbert WM, McElvy SS, El Kady D, Danielson B, Xing G, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after attempted suicide. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107: 984–990. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000216000.50202.f6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gelaye B, Kajeepeta S, Williams MA. Suicidal ideation in pregnancy: an epidemiologic review. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19: 741–751. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0646-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhong QY, Wells A, Rondon MB, Williams MA, Barrios Y V., Sanchez SE, et al. Childhood abuse and suicidal ideation in a cohort of pregnant Peruvian women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215: 501.e1–501.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alhusen JL, Frohman N, Purcell G. Intimate partner violence and suicidal ideation in pregnant women. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18: 573–578. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0515-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Belete A, Negash A, Birkie M. Help-seeking behaviour for depressive disorders among adult cardiovascular outpatient cardiac clinic Jimma University Teaching Hospital, Jimma, South-West Ethiopia: Crosssectional study. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019;13: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0259-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150: 782–786. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Murray D, Cox JL. Screening for Depression During Pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EPDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 1990;8: 99–107. doi: 10.1080/02646839008403615 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lau Y, Wang Y, Yin L, Chan KS, Guo X. Validation of the Mainland Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Chengdu mothers. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47: 1139–1151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rubertsson C, Börjesson K, Berglund A, Josefsson A, Sydsjö G. The Swedish validation of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during pregnancy. Nord J Psychiatry. 2011;65: 414–418. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2011.590606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hanlon C, Medhin G, Alem A, Araya M, Abdulahi A, Hughes M, et al. Detecting perinatal common mental disorders in Ethiopia: Validation of the self-reporting questionnaire and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. J Affect Disord. 2008;108: 251–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Golbasi Z, Kelleci M, Kisacik G, Cetin A. Prevalence and correlates of depression in pregnancy among Turkish women. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14: 485–491. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0459-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33: 335–343. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for Abuse During Pregnancy: Severity and Frequency of Injuries and Associated Entry Into Prenatal Care. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1992;267: 3176–3178. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03480230068030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arruda MA, Arruda R. Psychological adjustment in children with episodic migraine: A population-based study. Psychol Neurosci. 2014;7: 33–41. doi: 10.3922/j.psns.2014.1.06 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cohen S. Cohen Perceived Stress. J Heal Soc Behav. 1983;24.: 2. Available: http://podcast.uctv.tv/webdocuments/COHEN-PERCEIVED-STRESS-Scale.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Engidaw NA, Mekonnen AG, Amogne FK. Perceived stress and its associated factors among pregnant women in Bale zone Hospitals, Southeast Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12: 1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-4038-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kabito GG, Wami SD. Perceived work-related stress and its associated factors among public secondary school teachers in Gondar city: A cross-sectional study from Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4871-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Madebo WE, Yosef TT. Assessment of Perceived Stress Level and Associated Factors among Health Science Students at Debre Birehane University, North Shoa Zone of Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Heal Care Curr Rev. 2016;4: 1–9. doi: 10.4172/2375-4273.1000166 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Webster J, Linnane JWJ, Dibley LM, Hinson JK, Starrenburg SE, Roberts JA. Measuring social support in pregnancy: Can it be simple and meaningful? Birth. 2000;27: 97–101. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00097.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. PSQI article.pdf. Psychiatry Res. 1998;28: 193–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kessler RC, Üstün TB. The World Mental Health (WMH) Sur v e y Initiati v e Version of the World Health Organi z ation (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Inter v ie w (CIDI). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1981;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Molla A, Mengesha A, Derajew H, Kerebih H. Suicidal Ideation, Attempt, and Associated Factors among Patients with Tuberculosis in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Psychiatry J. 2019;2019: 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2019/4149806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haile K, Awoke T, Ayano G, Tareke M, Abate A, Nega M. Suicide ideation and attempts among people with epilepsy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2018;17: 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12991-018-0174-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gebremariam EH, Reta MM, Nasir Z, Amdie FZ. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Suicidal Ideation and Attempt among People Living with HIV/AIDS at Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Psychiatry J. 2017;2017: 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2017/2301524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bitew H, Andargie G, Tadesse A, Belete A, Fekadu W, Mekonen T. Suicidal Ideation, Attempt, and Determining Factors among HIV/AIDS Patients, Ethiopia. Depress Res Treat. 2016;2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/8913160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aïssat H, Cirio L, Grzeskowiak M, Laheurte JM, Picon O. Reconfigurable circularly polarized antenna for short-range communication systems. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 2006;54: 2856–2863. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2006.875454 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gelaye B, Williams M, Lemma S, Deyessa N, Bahretibeb Y, Shibre T, et al. Diagnostic validity of the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI) depression module in an east African population. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2013;46: 387–405. doi: 10.2190/PM.46.4.e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Adelekan ML, Odejide OA. The reliability and validity of the WHO student drug-use questionnaire among Nigerian students. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1989;24: 245–249. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(89)90062-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pinheiro AP, Nunes MAA, Hoffmann JF. 2660 –Suicidal ideation during pregnancy and risk factors for depressive symptoms in postpartum: a cohort study in a disadvantaged population in brazil. Eur Psychiatry. 2013;28: 1. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Asad N, Karmaliani R, Sullaiman N, Bann CM, McClure EM, Pasha O, et al. Prevalence of suicidal thoughts and attempts among pregnant Pakistani women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89: 1545–1551. doi: 10.3109/00016349.2010.526185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Coelho FMDC, Pinheiro RT, Silva RA, De Ávila Quevedo L, De Mattos Souza LD, De Matos MB, et al. Parental bonding and suicidality in pregnant teenagers: A population-based study in southern Brazil. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49: 1241–1248. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0832-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Da Silva RA, Da Costa Ores L, Jansen K, Da Silva Moraes IG, De Mattos Souza LD, Magalhães P, et al. Suicidality and associated factors in pregnant women in Brazil. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48: 392–395. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9495-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhong QY, Gelaye B, Rondon MB, Sánchez SE, Simon GE, Henderson DC, et al. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to assess suicidal ideation among pregnant women in Lima, Peru. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;18: 783–792. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0481-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huang H, Faisal-Cury A, Chan YF, Tabb K, Katon W, Menezes PR. Suicidal ideation during pregnancy: Prevalence and associated factors among low-income women in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2012;15: 135–138. doi: 10.1007/s00737-012-0263-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tabb KM, Gavin AR, Faisal-Cury A, Nidey N, Chan YF, Malinga T, et al. Prevalence of antenatal suicidal ideation among racially and ethnically diverse WIC enrolled women receiving care in a Midwestern public health clinic. J Affect Disord. 2019;256: 278–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Supraja TA, Thennarasu K, Satyanarayana VA, Seena TK, Desai G, Jangam K V., et al. Suicidality in early pregnancy among antepartum mothers in urban India. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19: 1101–1108. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0660-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Castro e Couto T, Brancaglion MYM, Cardoso MN, Faria GC, Garcia FD, Nicolato R, et al. Suicidality among pregnant women in Brazil: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19: 343–348. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0552-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gelaye B, Barrios Y V., Zhong QY, Rondon MB, Borba CPC, Sánchez SE, et al. Association of poor subjective sleep quality with suicidal ideation among pregnant Peruvian women. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015;37: 441–447. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.04.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Trettim JP, De Matos MB, Da Cunha GK, Martins CR de S, Rubin BB, Scholl CC, et al. The pregnancy as protection for suicidal behavior: a population-based study in south Brazil. Rev Eletrônica Acervo Saúde. 2020;12: e2083. doi: 10.25248/reas.e2083.2020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Courtet P, Baud P, Abbar M, Boulenger JP, Castelnau D, Mouthon D, et al. Association between violent suicidal behavior and the low activity allele of the serotonin transporter gene. Mol Psychiatry. 2001;6: 338–341. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guardino CM, Dunkel Schetter C. Coping during pregnancy: a systematic review and recommendations. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8: 70–94. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2012.752659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gelaye B, Addae G, Neway B, Larrabure-Torrealva GT, Qiu C, Stoner L, et al. Poor sleep quality, antepartum depression and suicidal ideation among pregnant women. J Affect Disord. 2017;209: 195–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tabb KM, Gavin AR, Guo Y, Huang H, Debiec K, Katon W. Views and Experiences of Suicidal Ideation During Pregnancy and the Postpartum: Findings from Interviews with Maternal Care Clinic Patients. Women Heal. 2013;53: 519–535. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2013.804024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Russell Kabir

14 May 2021

PONE-D-21-09284

SUICIDAL IDEATION AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING ANTENATAL CARE AT JIMMA MEDICAL CENTER, JIMMA, SOUTHWEST ETHIOPIA, 2020.

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Anbesaw,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 17 May 2021. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Russell Kabir, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

At this time, please address the following queries:

  1. Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

  2. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

  3. If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

  4. If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation. Authors’ affiliations should reflect the institution where the work was done (if authors moved subsequently, you can also list the new affiliation stating “current affiliation:….” as necessary).

6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

7. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

8. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 4 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Important investigation. Thanks. I have some suggestions to improve the paper.

Title: Could be more precise. To me some unnecessary things are there.

Abstarct_Method: Please mention the name of all the instruments used.

Conclusion: Seems repetition of the results

Introduction: Suicidal ideation (SI) is a passive thought... this is not correct. It can be both active and passive. Please check the context of the reference and reconfirm

Rationale is grossly absent. The study was done in Ethiopia not in all LAMICS. I was wondering why it has been doen in Ethiopia with substantial contextualizTION.

Methods: August 01-30/ 2020 at Jimma,,, August 2020 is enough

BSc psychiatry professionals?? could you please explain.

Results: Table 3: comorbid depression.... Please make it uniform i.e. if depression is comorbid why not anxiety and other disorder? I think mentioning depression indcate that it is comorbid

Discussion: I was looking for the limitations section while it should be mentioned that all intruments are not culturally validated.

Conclusion: Seems repetition of results.

Reviewer #2: a. The authors investigated an important area “Suicidal behaviour among pregnant women”. It is an area that is poorly studied. The present study found a significantly higher prevalence of suicidal ideation among Ethiopian pregnant women. This crucial information will be useful for the policy makers to augment the existing suicide prevention program.

b. How the authors have selected the catchment area for selection of participants?

c. Whether the authors have used any screening tool for assessment of Psychiatric disorders? Psychiatric disorder is an important attributing factor for suicidal behavior. It is important to look for it.

d. Refer to page 16: AT many places it has been mentioned (Error! Reference source not found.). Kindly provide the reference.

Reviewer #3: The author appears to assess the “prevalence and risk factor of suicidal ideation among pregnant women attending antenatal care at a medical center in Southwest Ethiopia” but the title of this manuscript says “SUICIDAL IDEATION AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING ANTENATAL CARE AT JIMMA MEDICAL CENTER, JIMMA, SOUTHWEST ETHIOPIA, 2020”. I suggest this title needs to be modified to this: “Prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation in Ethiopia: A case study of pregnant women attending antenatal care at Jimma medical center in Southwest Ethiopia”.

Please find below my review details:

Abstract:

� Under background, the author will need to recast the aim of the study as the year is not necessary.

� Line 1 in methods, the author conducted the study with 415 pregnant women. This is not the same number in the methodology section (423 mentioned). Also, the year of the study is not mentioned at all here and this is where it is really necessary.

� Line 1 in result, the author mentioned “current pregnancy”, he may need to recast the entire sentence.

Background:

� Paragraph 4 line 2, the author made some tautologies, like “including such as psychiatric disorders”. This needs to be looked into and corrected.

� Author needs to recast the whole of Paragraph 5. The message that is being communicated is not clear.

� In paragraph 6, the author mentioned that there “there are no studies in Ethiopia on the subject”. I conducted a quick search and found Amare et al., 2018; Bifftu et al., 2019 and Leul et al., 2021. With this, it shows clearly that the author has not done enough literature search and needs to do more.

Methods and Materials:

� Under study area, design and period, the author did not cite any reference.

� Author also touched on study area only, no information was provided on the study design and period or should one say that this entire section had not been well itemized. The author did not make clear if Source population, Study population, Inclusion and exclusion criteria and sampling procedure techniques are all under design and period as they are just listed here.

� The sample size here is 423 as against what is in the abstract.

� Author made a statement “similar to the previous study” in line 8 paragraph 2 under Data collection and method tools. I thought the author already said this is the first study?

� The author may need to recast the entire Data collection procedure section. It may not be necessary to include the degree of the psychiatric professionals and stating that the supervisor is a 1st year postgraduate student may not be necessary.

Results:

In this section, author needs to do a complete overhaul especially with typographical errors.

� Under obstetrics related characteristics of the participants, the author should delete “In the current study”, this is not needed.

� Line 3 and 4, Paragraph 2 under clinical and substance-related factors of the participants, the author gave percentages that are not correct. The percentages are supposed to be subset of 35 and not of the total. Therefore, the correct percentages should be 19 (54.2%), 13(37.1%) and against what it is in the manuscript.

� The author should remove all the error messages also “reference source not found”.

� Result presented under magnitude of suicidal ideation among pregnant women “where” are not well described. Author will need to touch some of the other data provided in the table.

� Paragraph 1 under “Factors associated with suicidal ideation among pregnant women” needs to either be completely removed or recast. It looks more to me like materials and method than results.

Discussion:

� This work is not well discussed. Author needs to conduct more literature search and discuss appropriately.  

Conclusion:

� Author needs to recast and conduct more literature search to arrive at a logical conclusion

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

� Author did not provide evidence of ethical approval for this study.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0255746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255746.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


9 Jul 2021

We are appreciating and thanking such like supporting comments and suggestions, it gives strength to do more. PLEASE ACCEPT OUR REVISED MANUSCRIPT. THANK YOU!

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Russell Kabir

23 Jul 2021

SUICIDAL IDEATION AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN ATTENDING ANTENATAL CARE IN JIMMA ,ETHIOPIA, 2020.

PONE-D-21-09284R1

Dear Dr. Tamrat,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Russell Kabir, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Russell Kabir

11 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-09284R1

Suicidal Ideation nd Associated Factors among Pregnant Women attending Antenatal Care in Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia.

Dear Dr. Anbesaw:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Russell Kabir

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES