Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Aug 25;11:17198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96789-4

Characterizing right-angled vessel in macular telangiectasia type 2 with structural optical coherence tomography

Yoo-Ri Chung 1,#, Young Ho Kim 2,#, Jaeryung Oh 2, Seong-Woo Kim 2, Christopher Seungkyu Lee 3,4,5, Cheolmin Yun 2, Boram Lee 2, So Min Ahn 2, Eun Young Choi 3,4,5, Sungmin Jang 6, Kihwang Lee 1,
PMCID: PMC8387352  PMID: 34433894

Abstract

We investigated the structural findings on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) related to the presence of right-angled vessels (RAV) in patients with macular telangiectasia (MacTel) type 2 with severity 3 in Korea. A retrospective multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted in six tertiary hospitals in Korea; the study included 116 MacTel type 2 eyes with severity 3. The SD-OCT findings were compared between eyes with RAV on fundus photography or fluorescein angiography and those without RAV. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with the presence of RAV. Fifty eyes presented with RAV and 61 eyes without RAV. More eyes presented with only inner retinal (IR) cavities on SD-OCT among eyes without RAV than among those with RAV (P < 0.001). However, eyes with RAV presented with IR disorganization, outer retinal (OR) cavity, and ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption more frequently than eyes without RAV did (all P < 0.001). These SD-OCT findings were significantly associated with the presence of RAV. The presence of RAV was closely related to IR disorganization, OR cavities, and EZ disruption on SD-OCT. These findings suggest an advanced phase of MacTel type 2.

Subject terms: Diseases, Risk factors

Introduction

The introduction of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) has allowed detailed observation of the structural characteristics, such as cavities in the inner and outer retina, disruption of the ellipsoid zone (EZ), and retinal atrophy, of macular telangiectasia (MacTel) type 21,2. However, the pathogenesis of MacTel type 2 has not been well described thus far. Recent studies indicate that MacTel type 2 is a result of degeneration or loss of Müller and photoreceptor cells with vascular changes as secondary manifestations3.

Unlike Gass’s proposal, Spaide et al.4 reported that the presence of right-angled veissels (RAV) was associated with retinal-choroidal anastomoses (RCA) without evidence of neovascularization, such as hemorrhage, exudation, and lipids on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). These vascular connections between the retinal deep capillary plexus and choroid were not a late stage phenomenon, as proposed by Gass, but could be seen with RAV, which is considered a signature of stage 34.

The previous studies based on OCTA reported that RCA were closely associated with the presence of RAV, showing RAV were seen in all eyes with RCA4,5. Although the relationship between EZ defect, outer retinal hyperreflective lesions and RAV was investigated by previous studies4,5, other structural findings on SD-OCT were not fully investigated. We previously reported the SD-OCT findings of MacTel type 2 in Korean patients; these patients presented with hyporeflective cavities and disruption of the external limiting membrane (ELM), EZ, and interdigitation zone (IDZ) as common features6. In this report, we investigated further various structural findings on SD-OCT related to the presence of RAV in patients with MacTel type 2 with severity 3.

Results

Among patients with MacTel type 2, 111 eyes in 69 patients with severity 3 were included in this analysis. There was no difference in the mean age of patients with and without RAV, and patients were predominantly female regardless of the presence of RAV (Table 1). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly better in eyes without RAV than in those with RAV.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of included patients according to the presence of right-angled vessel.

RAV No RAV P value
No. of patients 30 39
Age, mean ± SD 65.5 ± 10.7 67.3 ± 10.0 0.471
Female, no. (%) 20 (67%) 30 (77%) 0.344
No. of eyes 50 61
logMAR BCVA, mean ± SD 0.30 ± 0.26 0.21 ± 0.22 0.024*

BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, RAV right-angled vessel, SD standard deviation.

*Mean logMAR visual acuity was estimated by using generalized linear models and the generalized estimation equation method to account for the correlation between eyes. P value < 0.05 by generalized linear models and the generalized estimation equation method comparing the presence and absence of right-angled vessel.

The presence of most SD-OCT findings was statistically different between the groups with and without RAV (Table 2). Fifty eyes presented with only inner retinal hyporeflective cavities, and this finding was more frequent in eyes without RAV than in eyes with RAV (64% vs. 22%, P < 0.001). In contrast, inner retinal disorganization was more frequent in eyes with RAV than in those without RAV (40% vs. 7%, P < 0.001). The following SD-OCT findings of the outer retina were also more frequent in eyes with RAV than in eyes without RAV: outer retinal hyporeflective cavities (52% vs. 23%, P = 0.002), ELM disruption (50% vs. 18%, P < 0.001), EZ disruption (78% vs. 28%, P < 0.001), IDZ disruption (84% vs. 34%, P < 0.001), and collapsed outer nuclear layer (28% vs. 5%, P = 0.001). Representative cases are presented in Fig. 1.

Table 2.

SD-OCT findings of included eyes according to the presence of right-angled vessel.

RAV (N = 50) No RAV (N = 61) P value
Disorganization of inner retina 20 (40%) 4 (7%)  < 0.001*
Inner retinal cavity 43 (86%) 58 (95%) 0.096
Only inner retinal cavity 11 (22%) 39 (64%)  < 0.001*
Outer retinal cavity 26 (52%) 14 (23%) 0.002*
Temporal 18 (36%) 9 (15%) 0.009*
Center 17 (34%) 8 (13%) 0.009*
Nasal 3 (6%) 5 (8%) 0.656
Above ELM 24 (48%) 14 (23%) 0.006*
Below ELM 26 (52%) 10 (16%)  < 0.001*
ELM disruption 25 (50%) 11 (18%)  < 0.001*
EZ disruption 39 (78%) 17 (28%)  < 0.001*
IDZ disruption 42 (84%) 21 (34%)  < 0.001*
ONL collapse 14 (28%) 3 (5%) 0.001*

ELM external limiting membrane, EZ ellipsoid zone, IDZ interdigitation zone, ONL outer nuclear layer, RAV right-angled vessel.

*P values < 0.05 by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Representative cases of MacTel type 2 with severity 3. (A,B) A 58-year-old woman presented with a right-angled vessel (RAV, yellow arrows) on fundus photography (FP) and fluorescein angiography (FAG) of the right eye. (C) In the cross-section optical coherence tomography (OCT) B-scan (corresponding blue line in B), there were hyporeflective retinal cavities, ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption, and interdigitation zone (IDZ) disruption. (D,E) A 59-year-old man with RAV on FP and FAG of the right eye. (F) Hyporeflective retinal cavities, EZ disruption, and IDZ disruption were noted on cross-section OCT B-scan (corresponding blue line in E). (G,H) A 59-year-old female without RAV on FP and FAG of the left eye. (I) In the cross-section OCT B-scan (corresponding blue line in H), there were only inner hyporeflective retinal cavities.

We performed the logistic regression analysis to identify SD-OCT findings associated with the presence of RAV (Table 3). The following findings were associated with RAV: disorganization of the inner retina, outer retinal cavity, ELM disruption, EZ disruption, IDZ disruption, and collapsed outer nuclear layer. Among these factors, disorganization of the inner retina (odd ratio (OR) 4.358, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.223–15.525, P = 0.023), outer retinal hyporeflective cavity (OR 2.690, 95% CI 1.049–6.899, P = 0.040), and EZ disruption (OR 5.346, 95% CI 2.069–13.815, P = 0.001) remained significant in the multinomial logistic regression analysis.

Table 3.

Logistic regression for associated factors to the presence of right-angled vessel.

OR 95% CI P value
Age 0.178 0.937–1.012 0.974
Sex, male 1.902 0.815–4.438 0.137
Disorganization of inner retina 9.500 2.975–30.331  < 0.001*
Inner retinal cavity 0.318 0.078–1.300 0.111
Outer retinal cavity 3.637 1.610–8.215 0.002*
ELM disruption 4.545 1.930–10.703 0.001*
EZ disruption 9.146 3.835–21.955  < 0.001*
IDZ disruption 10.000 3.976–25.150  < 0.001*
ONL collapse 7.519 2.020–27.990 0.003*

ELM external limiting membrane, EZ ellipsoid zone, IDZ interdigitation zone, ONL outer nuclear layer.

*P values < 0.05 by logistic regression analysis.

Discussion

In this analysis of MacTel type 2 eyes with severity 3, inner retinal disorganization, outer retinal hyporeflective cavity, and EZ disruption on SD-OCT were associated with RAV. These OCT findings have already been reported to be associated with visual deterioration in macular diseases such as diabetic macular edema and epiretinal membrane. In diabetic macular edema, inner retinal disorganization and EZ disruption were associated with increased disease severity and decreased vision7. Similarly, EZ attenuation was associated with decreased vision in eyes with epiretinal membrane8,9. These OCT findings were also closely related to visual acuity in MacTel type 2, suggesting that these findings could be used as markers of visual disturbance6,10. However, inner retinal hyporeflective cavities without outer retinal abnormalities, the presence of which has been reported at an early stage of the disease6, did not show a significant association with RAV in this study.

Recently, RCA, vessels connecting the deep vascular plexus and the choriocapillaris, have been reported in MacTel type 2 on OCTA4,5,11. Interestingly, these findings did not accompany any subretinal neovascularization seen in Gass stage 54. Eyes with RCA presented with the following findings: hyperpigmentation, RAV, outer retinal hyperreflective lesion, and EZ defect on OCTA4,5. It is important to note that RCA were reported in two-thirds of MacTel type 2 cases, but this was not noted in eyes without RAV4.

In this analysis of MacTel type 2 eyes with severity 3, inner retinal disorganization, outer retinal hyporeflective cavity, and EZ disruption were SD-OCT findings associated with RAV. The association of RAV and RCA were previously reported4,5. Taken together, this suggests that the presence of these SD-OCT findings, which were related to RAV, might also be associated with RCA.

Powner et al.3,12 investigated the postmortem histology of patients with MacTel type 2 and reported a dramatic loss of Müller cells in the central retina. Hyporeflective cavities on OCT revealed no internal structures on histology, suggesting these cavities are filled with fluid3. Müller cells are responsible for the maintenance of the ion and water homeostasis of the retinal tissue and are also involved in the control of angiogenesis and neuronal signaling13. In a healthy retina, Müller cells dehydrate the retinal tissue via K+ channels and aquaporin-4 water channels on their plasma membrane and Kir4.1 channels on the perivascular processes of Müller cells13. However, in an ischemic or inflamed retina, the expression of the above-mentioned channels is dysregulated, resulting in Müller cell dysfunction13. Therefore, dysfunction of Müller cells may lead to surrounding cavities with fluid in MacTel type 2. Longstanding outer retinal cavities with atrophy of Müller cells, not by Müller cone cells, might cause the collapse of the retina and loss of photoreceptor cells, which would present as inner retinal disorganization and EZ disruption on SD-OCT. Moreover, Müller cells produce factors, such as pigment epithelium-derived growth factor (PEDF), tumor necrosis factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), that regulate the tightness of the endothelial barrier13. In diseased retinae, such as those in diabetic retinopathy, the production of VEGF is increased, while that of PEDF is reduced13. Hence, decreased release of anti-angiogenic factors, such as PEDF, may be associated with RAV (and RCA) in MacTel type 2.

Several limitations, including its retrospective nature, exist in this study. The lack of longitudinal evaluation is one of the limitations of this study, which is needed to investigate the progression of diseases and pathophysiology process of RAV and possibly RCA. Recently, several studies on longitudinal basis reported that the development of RCA might be associated with retinal subsidence and outer retinal hyperreflectivity12,13.

In conclusion, the present study showed that IR disorganization, OR cavity, and EZ disruption on SD-OCT were associated with the presence of RAV in MacTel type 2. This suggests that the presence of these SD-OCT findings, related with RAV, should be considered to have advanced phase MacTel type 2 in terms of vision with possible RCA.

Methods

This study complied with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the need for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of each participating hospital given the retrospective nature of the study. The following six hospitals participated in this study, and the IRBs of each participating hospital approved this study: Ajou University Hospital (Suwon, Korea, IRB No: AJIRB-MED-OBS-18-222), Korea University Anam Hospital (Seoul, Korea, IRB No: 2018AN0327), Korea University Guro Hospital (Seoul, Korea, IRB No: 2018GR0344), Korea University Ansan Hospital (Ansan, Korea, IRB No: 2018AS0224), Severance Hospital (Seoul, Korea, IRB No: 3-2018-0221), and Gangnam Severance Hospital (Seoul, Korea, IRB No: 3-2018-0221).

We reviewed the medical records and SD-OCT findings of 111 patients diagnosed with MacTel type 2 with severity 3 from the datasets of the six hospitals from January 2009 to May 2019. Severity 3 was defined by the MacTel Study Group as moderate-to-marked foveal hyperautofluorescence with angiographic abnormalities and foveal atrophy documented on OCT14,15. BCVA and demographic data, including sex and age, were collected from medical records at the time of diagnosis or first visit. The diagnosis of MacTel Type 2 was made by an ophthalmologist for each patient, based on a constellation of signs on multimodal imaging modalities such as fundus photo (FP), fluorescein angiography (FAG), and SD-OCT images. Patients who took tamoxifen or chloroquine derivatives, had diabetic retinopathy with 10 or more small retinal hemorrhages, and/or microaneurysms or other confounding retinal diseases were excluded. The collected images were retrospectively analyzed by a single retinal specialist (Y.H.K.).

The scanning methods of and characteristics observed on SD-OCT are described in detail in Report No. 16. Briefly, the following models of SD-OCT were used in this study: 3D OCT-1000 Mark II, Cirrus HD-OCT (Models 4000 and 5000, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA), Spectralis HRA + OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), or DRI OCT Triton (Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). The following characteristic findings on SD-OCT were recorded: disorganization of retinal inner layers, inner and outer retinal hyporeflective cavities, collapse of outer retinal layer, and disruption of the ELM, EZ, or IDZ. Disorganization of retinal inner layers was defined as boundaries between the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer complex, inner nuclear layer, and outer plexiform layers that could not be identified and demarcated. Hyporeflective cavity was classified into “inner” and “outer” cavity based on the border between the inner nuclear land outer plexiform layers. At the foveolar center where is no inner retinal layers, the cavity located within the inner half of the total retinal thickness or in contact with inner retinal surface was defined as inner retinal hyporeflective cavity (Supplementary Figure S1).

Categories for disease progression suggested by Wong et al.15 was used to identify eyes in MacTel type 2 with severity 3. Eyes in severity 2 demonstrate normal lamination and lacked any foveal cystic or atrophic changes on OCT, while eyes in severity 3 demonstrate central outer retinal atrophy on OCT, either as intraretinal cystic degeneration or as central thinning with loss of outer retinal lamination15. Accordingly, eyes showing inner retinal cavities without outer retinal degeneration were classified as severity 3, rather than severity 2. Eyes diagnosed with MacTel type 2 with severity 3 were divided into two groups according to the presence of RAV on FP or FAG. RAV was defined as blunted, slightly dilated vessels that are mainly located in the temporal parafovea and that drive at a right angle into deeper retinal layers without narrowing towards the foveola1,11. Snellen visual acuity was converted to logMAR visual acuity for statistical analysis, and a generalized linear model with generalized estimation equations was used to account for the correlation between eyes in the same patient. Independent t-tests were used to compare continuous variables, while categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Logistic regression analysis was used to verify SD-OCT factors associated with RAV and presented as ORs and 95% CIs. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

Part of this study was presented as a free paper at the 2020 Annual Congress of the Korean Retina Society, December 11-12, 2020 in Seoul, Korea. This work was supported by grants from the K-Bio Health R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HO16C0001).

Author contributions

J.O., S.-W.K., C.S.L., and K.L. designed the study. Y.-R.C., Y.H.K, C.Y., B.L., S.M.A, E.Y.C., and S.J. performed the data analysis. Y.-R.C. and Y.H.K. wrote the main manuscript. K.L. contributed to the discussion of the results and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Y.-R.C. and Y.H.K. equally contributed to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yoo-Ri Chung and Young Ho Kim.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-96789-4.

References

  • 1.Charbel Issa P, et al. Macular telangiectasia type 2. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2013;34:49–77. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coscas G, et al. SD-OCT stages of progression of type 2 macular telangiectasia in a patient followed for 3 years. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2013;23:917–921. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Powner MB, et al. Loss of Müller's cells and photoreceptors in macular telangiectasia type 2. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2344–2352. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spaide RF, Yannuzzi LA, Maloca PM. Retinal-choroidal anastomosis in macular telangiectasia type 2. Retina. 2018;38:1920–1929. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Breazzano MP, Yannuzzi LA, Spaide RF. Characterizing retinal-choroidal anastomosis in in macular telangiectasia type 2 with optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 2020;40:92–98. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim YH, et al. Optical coherence tomographic features of macular telangiectasia type 2: Korean Macular Telangiectasia Type 2 Study-Report No. 1. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:16594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73803-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Das R, Spence G, Hogg RE, Stevenson M, Chakravarthy U. Disorganization of inner retina and outer retinal morphology in diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136:202–208. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sheales MP, Kingston ZS, Essex RW. Associations between preoperative OCT parameters and visual outcome 3 months postoperatively in patients undergoing vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2016;254:1909–1917. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3326-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scheerlinck LM, van der Valk R, van Leeuwen R. Predictive factors for postoperative visual acuity in idiopathic epiretinal membrane: A systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:203–212. doi: 10.1111/aos.12537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peto T, et al. Correlation of clinical and structural progression with visual acuity loss in macular telangiectasia type 2: MacTel Project Report No. 6-The MacTel Research Group. Retina. 2018;38:S8–s13. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tzaridis S, et al. Right-angled vessels in macular telangiectasia type 2. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019;2:2. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Breazzano MP, Yannuzzi LA, Spaide RF. Genesis of retinal-choroidal anastomosis in macular telangiectasia type 2: A longitudinal analysis. Retina. 2021;41:464–470. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tzaridis S, et al. Hyperreflectivity on optical coherence tomography in macular telangiectasia type 2. Retina. 2021;41:1428–1437. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clemons TE, et al. Baseline characteristics of participants in the natural history study of macular telangiectasia (MacTel) MacTel Project Report No. 2. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010;17:66–73. doi: 10.3109/09286580903450361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wong WT, et al. Fundus autofluorescence in type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia: Correlation with optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009;148:573–583. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES