Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Aug 25;11:17197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96782-x

Renal function trajectories in hepatitis C infection: differences between renal healthy and chronic kidney disease individuals

Cheng-Kai Hsu 1, Tai-Shuan Lai 2, Yih-Ting Chen 1, Yi-Ju Tseng 3, Chin-Chan Lee 1, Chun-Yu Chen 1, Heng-Jung Hsu 1, Heng-Chih Pan 1, Li-Wei Chen 4, Cheng-Hung Chien 4, Chih-Lang Lin 4,5, Rong-Nan Chien 4, I-Wen Wu 1,5,6,
PMCID: PMC8387367  PMID: 34433887

Abstract

Associations between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been reported; however, differences of renal progression between general and CKD population remain to be elucidated in prospective studies. A total of 1179 participants, who have tested for anti-HCV antibody, were enrolled and prospectively followed for 3 years. The risks associated with HCV infection, in terms of incidence of CKD, annual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes and 50% decline of eGFR at 3-year from baseline, were compared between normal renal function subjects and CKD patients. Overall, 111 of 233 (47.6%) CKD patients and 167 of 946 (17.7%) non-CKD subjects had HCV infection. The crude incidence rates of CKD were 226.9 per 1000 person-years and 14.8 per 1000 person-years in in HCV and non-HCV infected patients, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio of HCV infection for incident CKD was 7.9 (95% CI 5–12.7). The HCV-infected normal renal function subjects were independently associated with increased risks of eGFR decline in the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year, respectively. The risk associations remained significant in 50% decline of eGFR at 3 years models and in different subgroup analyses. The increases of risks of eGFR decline were also notorious among overall HCV-infected CKD patients. However, the risk associations were less prominent in subgroup analyses (elderly, women and diabetic patients). The findings highlighted the importance of viral diagnosis with not only prognostic but also public health implications for preserving kidney function.

Subject terms: Chronic kidney disease, Liver diseases

Introduction

Understanding of risks of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is important, since the disease is associated with comorbidities, mortality and financial burden. Conventional risk factors for CKD include age, male gender, proteinuria, cardiovascular disease, smoking, diabetes and hypertension1. In addition, several non-traditional risk factors have been identified2. Emerging evidences have demonstrated possible associations between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and renal disease310. Chronic HCV infection can affect kidney function either through systemic inflammation or by increasing risk factors of CKD, including metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, mixed cryoglobulinemia, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, cardiovascular disease, lymphoproliferative disorders and depression1114.

The prevalence of HCV infection is approximately 1% in the western population affecting more than 71.1 million people globally15,16. However, the prevalence of this infection is higher than the burden of diabetes mellitus, in some endemic Asian countries, such as Taiwan, having a prevalence rate ranged from 1.6 to 19.6%17. This viral disease can increase morbidity, medical cost, impaired quality of life, high mortality and deserves timely intervention11,18,19.

A number of researches have indicated controversial associations between chronic HCV infection and development of CKD or renal progression. Various cohort studies and meta-analyses have shown that HCV-infected patients were associated with greater risks of developing CKD, progressive renal deterioration3,20 and end stage renal disease than patients without HCV infection46,2123. However, other studies found that carriers of HCV infection were associated with proteinuria rather than reduced eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate)24,25. Furthermore, Rogal et al. concluded that HCV infection was not significantly associated with progressive CKD (defined as decline of eGFR of ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 from baseline)26. As such, the exact roles of HCV infection played on the deterioration of renal function remain to be elucidated.

Therefore, the aims of this prospective cohort study were to determine the incidence of CKD associated with HCV infection among normal renal function subjects and to compare the changes of eGFR trajectories associated with HCV infection among individuals having normal renal function or CKD.

Materials and methods

Study design and patient settings

This prospective cohort study enrolled participants of multidisciplinary education program of CKD Prevention Center of Department of Nephrology of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung. This cohort included CKD patients of nephrology outpatient clinics as well as habitants of neighborhood community of Northwestern Taiwan, recruited from health promotion program. All participants aged ≥ 18 years having tested for anti-HCV antibody (Ab) during January 2012 to December 2014 were included for study. Those patients who underwent dialysis therapy, renal transplant graft or prior treatment for HCV infection were excluded from study. The serum creatinine was checked at annual-basis for consecutive three years to denote changes of renal function. Patients with incomplete laboratory data were excluded from analysis. Patients, who die or lose to follow-up, were censored. This study was conducted in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (IRB No. 201800273B0C602, 101-5105B, 201902192B0, clinical trial registration No. NCT04300387). The informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Ascertainment of HCV hepatitis

The anti-HCV Ab was measured at baseline by using a third-generation enzyme immunoassay kit (AxSYM® HCV Version 3.0; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, US). A value of 0.9 cutoff index was defined as positive.

Outcomes of interest and follow-up

The CKD was defined as having eGFR ⩽ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or any urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) ≥ 150 mg/g in 2 separate occasions three months apart. The eGFR was calculated by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI)27. Annual changes in eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) were recorded for every patient. The developments of new CKD (incident CKD model), absolute/relative changes of eGFR and percentages of patients having 50% decline of eGFR at 3rd years from the baseline (eGFR decline model) were accurately recorded during the follow-up period.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentage and compared using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR) and compared using Student t-test or Mann Whitney U test. Kolmogorov-Simirnov method was used to test normality of numerical variables. Analysis of CKD event-free survival was derived from the Kaplan–Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied to estimate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CKD associated with HCV infection in normal renal function population. Linear regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between changes in eGFR and HCV status. Firth logistic regression model was conducted to estimate odd ratios (ORs) of 50% decline of eGFR from baseline value during follow-up28. Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., US). All statistical tests were two-tailed and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics approval and patient consent statement

This study was conducted in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (IRB No. 201800273B0C602, 101-5105B, 201902192B0, clinical trial registration No. NCT04300387. The informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Results

Baseline characteristics of HCV and non-HCV patients

A total of 1179 participants (946 non-CKD and 233 CKD patients) were included for study from January 2012 and December 2014 (Fig. 1). The mean age of participants was 59.2 years and 400 (33.9%) were men. Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics between HCV (n = 278) and non-HCV infected subjects (n = 901), stratified by CKD status. The numbers of HCV infection were 111 (47.6%) among CKD patients and 167 (17.7%) among non-CKD subjects, respectively (p < 0.005). HCV-infected patients tended to be older, were more likely to be men, were more likely to have diabetes and hypertension than non-HCV subjects. HCV-infected patients also had lower eGFR, higher UPCR, lower serum level of albumin and hemoglobin but higher levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, uric acid and glycated hemoglobin than those patients without HCV infection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study design and patient flow schema. CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCV, hepatitis C virus infection.

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of all patients stratified by CKD and HCV infection (n = 1179).

Variables All (n = 1179) Non-CKD (n = 946) CKD (n = 233)
Non-HCV HCV p-value Non-HCV HCV p-value
(n = 779) (n = 167) (n = 122) (n = 111)
Age (years) 59.2 ± 11 56.7 ± 10.2 61 ± 10.7  < 0.001 64 ± 10.4 68.3 ± 10.6 0.002
Male, No (%) 400 (33.9) 240 (30.8) 69 (41.3) 0.009 39 (32) 52 (46.8) 0.02
Diabetes, No (%) 239 (20.3) 65 (8.3) 72 (43.1)  < 0.001 39 (32) 63 (56.8)  < 0.001
Hypertension, No (%) 374 (31.7) 180 (23.1) 51 (30.5) 0.043 69 (56.6) 74 (66.7) 0.114
eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2) 90 ± 27.7 98.2 ± 21.2 89.1 ± 22.4  < 0.001 81.4 ± 32.1 43.6 ± 20.6  < 0.001
AST (U/L) 27.3 ± 21.3 24.3 ± 15.5 47.8 ± 34.8  < 0.001 26.5 ± 9.1 50.2 ± 58.4  < 0.001
ALT (U/L) 29.2 ± 30.9 25.1 ± 22.8 49.2 ± 45.4  < 0.001 27.7 ± 16.4 50.4 ± 71.6 0.001
Uric acid (mg/dL) 5.6 ± 1.4 5.4 ± 1.3 6.1 ± 1.5  < 0.001 6.1 ± 1.5 6.8 ± 1.7 0.009
Albumin (g/dL) 4.6 ± 0.4 4.7 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.7  < 0.001 4.6 ± 0.3 3.8 ± 0.6  < 0.001
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 13.6 ± 1.6 13.8 ± 1.4 12.9 ± 2.1  < 0.001 13.6 ± 1.5 11.9 ± 1.9  < 0.001
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 209.1 ± 37.9 211.1 ± 36.3 202.4 ± 43.2 0.06 205.8 ± 41.9 193.1 ± 39.1 0.08
LDL (mg/dL) 126.2 ± 31.8 127.3 ± 31.1 125.8 ± 40.1 0.771 120.4 ± 32.6 107.2 ± 28.5 0.266
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 123.2 ± 88.6 118 ± 80.7 120.3 ± 57.6 0.827 157.4 ± 135.1 124.8 ± 79.6 0.134
Glycohemoglobin (%) 6 ± 1 5.8 ± 0.6 7.1 ± 1.8  < 0.001 6.4 ± 1.3 7.1 ± 1.8 0.01
UPCR, median (IQR) (mg/g) 64.1 (48–98.9) 56.6 (44–76.9) 90.8 (58.7–125)  < 0.001* 110.9 (73.1–279.4) 400.3 (111.4–924.7)  < 0.001*

ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CKD chronic kidney disease, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HCV hepatitis C virus, IQR interquartile range, LDL low-density lipoprotein, UPCR urine protein to creatinine ratio.

*p-value using Mann–Whitney U test.

HCV and incident CKD

From 949 non-CKD subjects, 86 of 167 HCV patients (51.5%) and 34 of 779 non-HCV patients (4.3%) developed incident CKD after mean follow-up of 36 months (p < 0.001). The crude incidence rates of CKD were 226.9 per 1000 person-years and 14.8 per 1000 person-years in HCV and non-HCV patients, respectively (Table 2). The Cox proportional hazards regression model revealed that presence of HCV infection had a 7.9-fold risk (HR 7.9; 95% CI 5–12.7) of developing CKD after adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, baseline renal function and UPCR (Table 2). In subgroup analyses, we found that the adjusted HRs for development of CKD associated with HCV infection were higher for young adults (< 60 years), men, non-diabetes and non-hypertensive patients compared with elderly, women, diabetes and hypertensive patients (Table 2). Figure 2 illustrates that cumulative proportion of CKD event-free survival was lower in HCV group compared with non-HCV group (Log-rank test, p < 0.001).

Table 2.

Incidence rates and hazard ratio (HR) for CKD according to HCV infection.

Population HCV status No. of patients Person years No. of CKD events Time to CKD events Crude incidence of CKD* Crude HR (95% CI) Adjusted HRa (95% CI)
All patients Non-HCV 779 2291 34 35.3 14.8 1 1
HCV 167 379 86 27.2 226.9 16 (11–24) 7.9 (5–12.7)
Age, years
18–59 Non-HCV 465 1383 7 35.7 5.1 1 1
HCV 73 175 33 28.8 188.6 39 (17–88) 21.7 (8.8–53.8)
≥ 60 Non-HCV 314 908 27 34.7 29.7 1 1
HCV 94 204 53 26 259.8 9.3 (5.8–15) 5.2 (2.9–9.2)
Gender
Men Non-HCV 240 704 13 35.2 18.5 1 1
HCV 69 144 44 25 305.6 18 (9.7–34) 13.9 (6.7–29.1)
Women Non-HCV 539 1587 21 35.3 13.2 1 1
HCV 98 235 42 28.8 178.7 14 (8.3–24) 4.8 (2.6–9)
Diabetes Non-HCV 65 178 10 32.9 56.2 1 1
HCV 72 149 48 24.8 322.1 6.2 (3.2–12) 5.2 (2.1–12.9)
Non-diabetes Non-HCV 714 2113 24 35.5 11.4 1 1
HCV 95 230 38 29.1 165.2 15 (9–25) 8.8 (5–15.4)
HTN Non-HCV 180 512 21 34.1 41 1 1
HCV 51 108 26 25.4 240.7 5.2 (2.9–9.3) 5 (2.4–10.4)
Non-HTN Non-HCV 598 1776 13 35.7 7.3 1 1
HCV 117 274 60 28.1 218.9 29 (15.9–53) 12.5 (6.2–25.2)

Time to events was expressed in means (months). *Per 1000 person-years.

CKD chronic kidney disease, HCV hepatitis C virus, HR hazard ratio, HTN hypertension.

aAdjusted for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, baseline eGFR, and urine protein to creatinine ratio.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cumulative proportion of CKD free survival by HCV infection at study entry. CKD, chronic kidney disease; HCV, hepatitis C virus infection. Log-rank test, p < 0.001.

HCV and eGFR trajectory in normal renal function subjects

Linear regression analysis was further conducted to explore the differences of eGFR trajectories in patients with HCV infection, by using change of eGFR at 12 month (first-year eGFR change: 12mo − 0mo), 24 month (second-year eGFR change: 24mo − 0mo) and 36 month (third-year eGFR change: 36mo − 0mo) versus the baseline eGFR. Figure 3 displays the β of HCV associated with eGFR changes, stratified by year and by comorbidities. Among all of normal renal function subjects, HCV-infected patients had more prominent eGFR declines than those without HCV infection (Fig. 3A, Table S1). The HCV infection was independently associated with increases of risks of eGFR decline, being the β of − 9 (95% CI − 12.4 to − 5.5, p < 0.001), − 11.5 (95% CI − 14.7 to − 8.3, p < 0.001), and − 10.3 (95% CI − 13.1 to − 7.6, p < 0.001), after adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, baseline eGFR and UPCR, in the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year linear regression models, respectively. The risk associations between eGFR decline and HCV infection remained significant in different subgroup analyses (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Unstandartized coefficients of HCV in a linear regression model for annual eGFR decline in subjects with normal function at baseline (A) and patients with CKD at baseline (B). CKD, chronic kidney disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCV, hepatitis C virus infection; HTN, hypertension.

HCV and eGFR trajectory in CKD patients

The increases of risks of eGFR declines also were notorious among overall CKD patients infected with HCV (Fig. 3B, Table S2). Linear regression analyses showed that HCV infection was independently associated with increased risks of eGFR decline after adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, baseline eGFR and UPCR, except the 2-year model [β were − 6.7 (95% CI − 12.2 to − 1.1, p = 0.019), − 8.4 (95% CI − 19.3 to 2.5, p = 0.129) and − 5.2 (95% CI − 9.9 to − 0.6, p = 0.028) in 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year models, respectively, Fig. 3B). In contrast to the normal renal function subjects, the increases of risks of renal progression at 1st, 2nd or 3rd years were inconsistent in different subgroups of HCV infected-CKD patients stratified by age (< or ≥ 60 years old), gender, diabetic and hypertension status. The risks of annual eGFR decline associated with HCV were less prominent for women, diabetic patients and older patients during 3-year follow up (Fig. 3B). The differences of annual absolute (and relative) eGFR changes between HCV and non-HCV patients were illustrated in Table S1 (normal renal function subjects) and Table S2 (CKD patients), respectively.

To further clarify the impact of HCV infection on the eGFR trajectories of patients according to the severity of renal dysfunction, we illustrated the differences of changes of slopes of eGFR stratified by HCV status and CKD stages during follow-up. The differences of eGFR slopes were greatest in normal renal function subjects but less prominent in mild CKD subjects stratified by HCV status (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Differences of eGFR trajectories during follow-up according to HCV infection among normal renal function individuals and those with different stages of CKD. The mean slope of eGFR decline was − 6.56 mL/min/1.73 m2/year vs. − 2.27 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (p < 0.001) in HCV infected and non-HCV infected normal renal function subjects (A); − 4.85 mL/min/1.73 m2/year vs. − 4.21 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (p = 0.698) in HCV infected and non-HCV infected mild CKD patients (B) and − 4.14 mL/min/1.73 m2/year vs. − 0.9 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (p < 0.001) in HCV infected and non-HCV infected moderate to severe CKD patients (C), respectively. The eGFR change was presented as mean and confidential interval (CI). Mild CKD denoted stage 1–2 CKD, and moderate to severe CKD, stage 3–5 CKD. CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCV, hepatitis C virus infection. * p < 0.05, annual eGFR of non-HCV versus HCV; # p < 0.05, eGFR slope of non-HCV versus HCV.

HCV and 50% of eGFR decline from baseline value at third year

We performed an event-driven analysis using surrogate endpoint of 50% decline of eGFR from baseline value during 3 years of follow-up. From all of the normal renal function subjects, 26 of 167 (15.6%) HCV-infected patients but none of 779 (0%) non-HCV patients developed 50% decline of eGFR during follow-up. On the other hand, from overall CKD patients, 32 of 111 (28.9%) HCV-infected patients and 3 of 122 (2.5%) non-HCV patients developed 50% decline of eGFR at 3 years. The Firth logistic regression model revealed that HCV-infected normal renal function subjects had 80.54-fold increased risks of developing 50% decline of eGFR, after adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, baseline renal function and UPCR, compared to non-infected counterparts. However, the risks of 50% eGFR decline associated with HCV were not significant in CKD patients after adjusting for many traditional risk factors (Table 3).

Table 3.

Risks for the 50% decline in eGFR from the baseline value at 3-year of follow-up.

Variables Normal renal function subjects CKD patients
Crude Adjusted* Crude Adjusted*
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Age (per 1 year incremental) 1.06 (1.02–1.1) 0.006 1.08 (1.01–1.18) 0.016 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.456 0.96 (0.88–1.04) 0.317
Male Gender 2.28 (1.04–5.04) 0.04 4.43 (1.22–19.6) 0.023 1.21 (0.58–2.48) 0.603 1.17 (0.22–6.17) 0.846
Diabetes 33.03 (12.81–106.51)  < 0.001 11.29 (2.73–64.69)  < 0.001 4.47 (2.08–10.36)  < 0.001 2.98 (0.62–17.62) 0.172
Hypertension 1.03 (0.39–2.41) 0.95 3.26 (0.75–15.52) 0.114 0.93 (0.45–1.94) 0.835 0.86 (0.13–7.16) 0.879
Baseline eGFR (per 1 ml/min/1.73m2 incremental) 0.95 (0.92–0.97)  < 0.001 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 0.529 0.94 (0.91–0.96)  < 0.001 0.93 (0.88–0.97)  < 0.001
UPCR (mg/g) 1.0003 (1.0001–1.0005)  < 0.001 1.0001 (1–1.0004) 0.096 1.0007 (1.0004–1.0012)  < 0.001 1.0006(1.0003–1.0010)  < 0.001
HCV 278.9 (38.62–35,467.07)  < 0.001 80.54 (9.03–10,737.96)  < 0.001 13.96 (5.06–52.8)  < 0.001 1.54 (0.29–8.56) 0.603

CKD chronic kidney disease, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HCV hepatitis C virus, OR odd ratios, UPCR urine protein to creatinine ratio.

*Adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, baseline eGFR, and UPCR.

Discussion

Although the relationships between HCV infection and risk of CKD have been established in previous studies; however, the associated risks of renal progression have not been simultaneously explored in both normal renal function and CKD individuals. This 3-year prospective study has demonstrated that HCV infection has linked to increased risks of development of CKD and renal progression in the normal renal function subjects. However, the risk of renal progression associated with HCV in CKD patients may vary according to comorbidities and severity of renal dysfunction. The findings highlighted the importance of viral diagnosis with not only prognostic but also public health implications for preventing CKD and preserving renal function in the general population.

The incidence of CKD associated with HCV infection in our study was higher (217.3 per 1000 person-years) than previous estimates5,6. Differences in CKD definition, prevalence of HCV and variation of viral genotyping may explain the discrepancies observed among the diverse studies. The increases of risks of incident CKD and eGFR decline associated with HCV infection found in our study corroborated with the findings of some previous researches37,9,14,20,22,2931 but inconsistent with others24,25. While some cross-sectional studies have applied cut-values of eGFR by using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) or CKD-EPI equation to define CKD24,25, others prospective studies have employed male-predominant participants5 or disease code-based registry claim data to ascertaining renal outcome rather than the changes of serum creatinine or eGFR slopes4,6,29,30. Consequently, serial measurements of serum creatinine and urine protein were largely lacking and may in part underestimate the exact incidence of CKD.

The faster eGFR decline observed in our HCV-infected normal renal function subjects than those infected CKD patients may further need investigation. The HCV can induce systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction triggering glomerular damage19,32. Nevertheless, the sharing of many risk factors may also play roles on the association between two disease entities3335. However, the HCV infection remained significant risk factor of eGFR decline after adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, baseline eGFR and UPCR in the normal renal function subjects of our study. In addition, interventional studies have indicated that reductions of viral load were associated with improvement of renal function in patients receiving antiviral treatment7,29,3639, implicating an independent role of HCV in inducing renal damage from very early stage of disease.

Various subgroup analyses of CKD patients of this study have allowed better understanding of association of renal progression with HCV infection. The attenuation of risks of HCV on the renal progression of elderly, diabetic and hypertensive CKD patients was peculiar. The HCV interferes with insulin-signaling pathway, triggers epigenetics changes, modulates cellular gene expression, regulates circulating mi-RNA and promotes post-translational changes, leading to abnormal gluconeogenic and lipid storage process. Ultimately, it can result in insulin resistance, hyperglycemia and hepatic steatosis4042. The association between HCV infection and diabetes mellitus has been extensively described43,44. Clinically, HCV-infected diabetes patients, who achieved sustained virologic response with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, have better glycemic control and less hypoglycemic drugs dosing than those who had treatment failure45,46. It is likely that the contribution of HCV infection to renal progression in CKD patients may in part masked by the coexistence of important comorbidities, considering all the metabolic, oxidative and inflammatory disarrangements associated with those diseases. Further experiments should be needed to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanisms of renal damage associated with HCV infection in the diverse primary kidney diseases and associated comorbidities.

Several limitations must also be addressed. First, the information regarding serum HCV RNA levels, viral genotypes and histological grading of renal or liver injury was lacking. HCV-related immune glomerulopathies could not be inferred from our study. However, we have excluded patients who received prior treatment of HCV from the study and may decrease the false-positive rate of active HCV infection and the antiviral drugs effects on renal function. Second, the findings were derived from a single ethnic population of high HCV prevalence, which may limit the generalizability of our findings to groups of different areas. Finally, many confounders, such as environmental exposures, nutrition and food styles, health-seeking behaviors and medications histories related to the development of CKD were not determined. Although such variables can be assumed as nondifferential misclassification in this study; however, serial measurements of renal function, simultaneous comparison of effects of HCV infection on the eGFR trajectories between normal renal function subjects and CKD patients, intermediate follow-up period of 36 months and multiple stratified/sensitivity analyses may strengthen the conjecture of our supposition.

In conclusion, individuals infected with HCV were at high risk of developing CKD. The HCV-infected normal renal function subjects were associated with greater risks of renal progression than the HCV-infected CKD patients. While effects of HCV infection on eGFR trajectory of diabetic or hypertensive CKD patients remains to be clarified; however, HCV infection may represent new modifiable CKD risk factor in the era of DAA therapy. The timely diagnosis of HCV infection and frequent kidney function monitoring in infected individuals should be recommended for routine clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the CKD prevention Center and Community Medicine Research Center (CLRPG2L0051) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Keelung for recruitment of participants, maintenance of study cohort and sample preparation.

Author contributions

I.W.W. and C.K.H. designed the study; Y.T.C., C.C.L., H.J.H., C.Y.C., H.C.P., L. W.C., C.H.C., C.L.L., R.N.C. and Y.C.S. carried out experiments; I.W.W., C.K.H., T.C.L. and Y.J.T. analyzed the data; C.K.H. and Y.J.T. made the figures; I.W.W., C.K.H. and T.C.L. drafted and revised the paper; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by research grants from the Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CRRPG2H0122, CMRPG2C0342, CMRPG2F0073 and CLRPG2L0051) and from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 109-2314-B-182A-127).

Data availability

All analytic data were incorporated into the article and the raw data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-96782-x.

References

  • 1.Nelson RG, et al. Development of risk prediction equations for incident chronic kidney disease. JAMA. 2019;8:2104–2114. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kronenberg F. Emerging risk factors and markers of chronic kidney disease progression. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2009;5:677–689. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Park H, Adeyemi A, Henry L, Stepanova M, Younossi Z. A meta-analytic assessment of the risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J. Viral. Hepat. 2015;22:897–905. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen YC, Lin HY, Li CY, Lee MS, Su YC. A nationwide cohort study suggests that hepatitis C virus infection is associated with increased risk of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2014;85:1200–1207. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Molnar MZ, et al. Association of hepatitis C viral infection with incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease in a large cohort of US veterans. Hepatology. 2015;61:1495–1502. doi: 10.1002/hep.27664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Park H, et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) increases the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) while effective HCV treatment decreases the incidence of CKD. Hepatology. 2018;67:492–504. doi: 10.1002/hep.29505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang H, et al. Association of Hepatitis C and B Virus Infection with CKD and Impact of Hepatitis C Treatment on CKD. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36437-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moorman AC, et al. Prevalence of renal impairment and associated conditions among HCV-infected persons in the chronic hepatitis cohort study (CHeCS) Dig. Dis. Sci. 2016;61:2087–2093. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4199-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dalrymple LS, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection and the prevalence of renal insufficiency. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007;2:715–721. doi: 10.2215/cjn.00470107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee JJ, et al. Association of hepatitis C and B virus infection with CKD in an endemic area in Taiwan: A cross-sectional study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2010;56:23–31. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Younossi Z, Park H, Henry L, Adeyemi A, Stepanova M. Extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C: A meta-analysis of prevalence, quality of life, and economic burden. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1599–1608. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cacoub P, et al. Extrahepatic manifestations of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Ther. Adv. Infect Dis. 2016;3:3–14. doi: 10.1177/2049936115585942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Angeletti A, Cantarelli C, Cravedi P. HCV-associated nephropathies in the era of direct acting antiviral agents. Front Med. 2019;6:20. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ishizaka N, et al. Association between hepatitis B/C viral infection, chronic kidney disease and insulin resistance in individuals undergoing general health screening. Hepatol. Res. 2008;38:775–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00334.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Denniston MM, et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2010. Ann. Int. Med. 2014;160:293–300. doi: 10.7326/m13-1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blach S, Zeuzem S, Manns M, Altraif I, Duberg AS, Muljono DH, Waked I, Alavian SM, Lee MH, Negro F, Abaalkhail F. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: A modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015;2:161–176. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(16)30181-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun CA, et al. Transmission of hepatitis C virus in Taiwan: Prevalence and risk factors based on a nationwide survey. J. Med. Virol. 1999;59:290–296. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199911)59:3&#x0003c;290::AID-JMV5&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tong X, Spradling PR. Increase in nonhepatic diagnoses among persons with hepatitis C hospitalized for any cause, United States, 2004–2011. J. Viral. Hepat. 2015;22:906–913. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Latt N, Alachkar N, Gurakar A. Hepatitis C virus and its renal manifestations: A review and update. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012;8:434–445. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fabrizi F, Verdesca S, Messa P, Martin P. Hepatitis C virus infection increases the risk of developing chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2015;60:3801–3813. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3801-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lai TS, et al. Hepatitis C viral load, genotype, and increased risk of developing end-stage renal disease: REVEAL-HCV study. Hepatology. 2017;66:784–793. doi: 10.1002/hep.29192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Butt AA, Wang X, Fried LF. HCV infection and the incidence of CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2011;57:396–402. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee JJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection increases risk of developing end-stage renal disease using competing risk analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kurbanova N, Qayyum R. Association of Hepatitis C Virus Infection with Proteinuria and Glomerular Filtration Rate. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2015;8:421–424. doi: 10.1111/cts.12321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fabrizi F, Martin P, Dixit V, Messa P. Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney disease: A meta-analysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012;7:549–557. doi: 10.2215/cjn.06920711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rogal SS, et al. Incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease after hepatitis C seroconversion: Results from ERCHIVES. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2016;61:930–936. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3918-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levey AS, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Int. Med. 2006;145:247–254. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat. Med. 2002;21:2409–2419. doi: 10.1002/sim.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen YC, Hwang SJ, Li CY, Wu CP, Lin LC. A taiwanese nationwide cohort study shows interferon-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C reduces the risk of chronic kidney disease. Medicine. 2015;94:e1334. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000001334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tartof SY, et al. Kidney function decline in patients with CKD and untreated hepatitis C infection. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018;13:1471–1478. doi: 10.2215/cjn.01530218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lai TS, et al. High hepatitis C viral load and genotype 2 are strong predictors of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2017;92:703–709. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Perico N, Cattaneo D, Bikbov B, Remuzzi G. Hepatitis C infection and chronic renal diseases. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009;4:207–220. doi: 10.2215/cjn.03710708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chang PY, et al. Risk factors of gender for renal progression in patients with early chronic kidney disease. Medicine. 2016;95:e4203. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000004203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Inaguma D, et al. Risk factors for CKD progression in Japanese patients: Findings from the Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort (CKD-JAC) study. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2017;21:446–456. doi: 10.1007/s10157-016-1309-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tsai CW, Lin SY, Kuo CC, Huang CC. Serum uric acid and progression of kidney disease: A longitudinal analysis and mini-review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0170393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aby ES, Dong TS, Kawamoto J, Pisegna JR, Benhammou JN. Impact of sustained virologic response on chronic kidney disease progression in hepatitis C. World J. Hepatol. 2017;9:1352–1360. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i36.1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hsu YC, et al. Association between antiviral treatment and extrahepatic outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. Gut. 2015;64:495–503. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sise ME, et al. Direct-acting antiviral therapy slows kidney function decline in patients with Hepatitis C virus infection and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2020;97:193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.04.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu CH, et al. Evolution of eGFR in chronic HCV patients receiving sofosbuvir-based or sofosbuvir-free direct-acting antivirals. J. Hepatol. 2020;72:839–846. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rafique S, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiling of HCV pathogenesis to develop diabetes and diabetic complications. J. Viral. Hepat. 2021;28:245–259. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Singhal A, Agrawal A, Ling J. Regulation of insulin resistance and type II diabetes by hepatitis C virus infection: A driver function of circulating miRNAs. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018;22:2071–2085. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ashfaq UA, Khalid H. Mechanism of hepatitis C virus-induced diabetes mellitus. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2017;27:363–371. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2017020437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lin YJ, et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection and the risk for diabetes: A community-based prospective study. Liver Int. 2017;37:179–186. doi: 10.1111/liv.13194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fabiani S, Fallahi P, Ferrari SM, Miccoli M, Antonelli A. Hepatitis C virus infection and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2018;19:405–420. doi: 10.1007/s11154-017-9440-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hum J, et al. Improvement in glycemic control of type 2 diabetes after successful treatment of hepatitis C virus. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1173–1180. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adinolfi LE, et al. Reduced incidence of type 2 diabetes in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection cleared by direct-acting antiviral therapy: A prospective study. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2020;22:2408–2416. doi: 10.1111/dom.14168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All analytic data were incorporated into the article and the raw data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES