Skip to main content
Cancer Reports logoLink to Cancer Reports
. 2021 May 1;4(4):e1352. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1352

Use of the prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) test in the United States for men age ≥65, 1999–2015: Implications for practice interventions

Shahram Shahangian 1,, Lin Fan 1, Krishna P Sharma 2, David A Siegel 2
PMCID: PMC8388175  PMID: 33932150

Abstract

Background

Various professional organizations have issued recommendations on use of the PSA test to screen for prostate cancer in different age groups.

Aims

Using Medicare claims databases, we aimed to determine rates of PSA testing in the context of screening recommendations during 1999–2015 for US men age ≥65, stratified by age group and census regions, after excluding claims relating to all prostate‐related conditions.

Methods and Results

Medicare claims databases encompassed 9.71–11.12 million men for the years under study. PSA testing rate was the proportion of men with ≥1 test(s) per 12 months of continuous enrollment. Men diagnosed with any prostate‐related condition were excluded. Annual percent change (APC) in PSA test use was estimated using joinpoint regression analysis. In 1999–2015, annual testing rate was 10.1%–23.1%, age ≥85; 16.6%–31.0%, age 80–84; 23.8%–35.8%, age 75–79; 28.3%–36.9%, age 70–74; and 26.4%–33.6%, age 65–69. From 1999 to 2015, PSA testing rate decreased 40.7%, 29.9%, 13.9%, and 2.9%, respectively, for men age ≥85, 80–84, 75–79, and 70–74. For men age 65–69, test use increased by 0.3%. Significant APC trends were: APC1999–2002 = +8.1%, P = .029 and APC2008–2015 = −9.0%, P < .001 for men age ≥85; APC2008–2015 = −7.1%, P = .001 for men age 80–84; APC2001–2015 = −2.5%, P < .001 for men age 75–79; APC2008–2015 = −3.3%, P = .007 for men age 70–74; and APC2010–2015 = −5.2%, P = .014 for men age 65–69.

Coclusion

Although decreased from 1999 to 2015, PSA testing rates remained high for men age ≥70. Further research could help understand why PSA testing continues inconsistent with recommendations.

Keywords: mass screening, prostate‐specific antigen, prostatic neoplasm, public health practice

1. INTRODUCTION

Screening recommendations for prostate cancer using the test for prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) have evolved over the past two decades. Although there are a few national estimates of PSA testing rates over recent decades relating to men age ≥65, none have involved an assessment of testing rates and trends over a period of almost two decades, from 1999 to 2015. In 1996, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against routine screening for prostate cancer by using the PSA test.1 In 2002, the USPSTF concluded that there was insufficient evidence to make any recommendation to screen for prostate cancer using the PSA test.2 In 2008, the USPSTF recommended against screening of men age ≥75 years, with no recommendation for younger men.3 In 2012, the USPSTF recommended against PSA screening of men for prostate cancer regardless of age.4 Subsequent to the 2012 recommendation, the USPSTF released a draft recommendation in April 2017 noting that men age ≥70 should not be screened, and that the potential benefits and harms of PSA‐based screening were closely balanced in men age 55–69, and that the decision whether to be screened should be an individual one.5 The USPSTF issued its most recent recommendations in May 2018,6 that was identical to the 2017 draft recommendations.5 The American Urological Association (AUA)7 and American College of Physicians (ACP)8 in 2013 both recommended against routine screening of men age ≥70. Like the USPSTF,6 the AUA recommended that the decision for men age 50–69 to submit to screening be an individual one7 and the ACP recommended individualized screening in this age group be limited to those with at least 10 years of life expectancy.8 In 2016, the American Cancer Society (ACS) stipulated a starting age of 50 for individualized PSA‐based screening of men with at least 10 years of life expectancy.9 In 2001–2002, the AUA, ACP, and ACS all included informed and shared decision‐making, with the AUA and ACP recommending a starting age of 50.10

Using Medicare claims databases in the context of screening recommendations for prostate cancer, our objective was to determine the rates and trends for annual PSA testing in US men age ≥65 in 1999–2015, stratified by age group, after excluding claims relating to all prostate‐related conditions. Annual testing rates and trends were examined for different age groups overall and after stratifying by the four US Census regions. These analyses were undertaken to assess PSA screening uptake in older men of different age groups and particularly those age ≥70 for whom routine PSA screening is not recommended. Information gained from this study may be used to inform current practice interventions.

2. METHODS

2.1. Population

We used 100% Career files for Medicare claims data for men age ≥65 from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2015, encompassing 9.71–11.12 million men with continuous enrollment for each calendar year. We excluded all men with claims containing one or more diagnoses or non‐laboratory procedures relating to various prostate‐related diseases or conditions, including those diagnostic codes related to elevated PSA or history of prostate cancer (see Appendix). Although men with nonmalignant prostate‐related diseases or conditions may indeed undergo PSA testing for screening purposes, it is likely that some may have undergone PSA testing in the context of differential diagnosis in order to rule out prostate cancer. We therefore opted to conservatively exclude all populations with encounter claims for PSA testing that may have been performed for differential diagnosis, monitoring, or prognostic purposes. We included only claims with a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT, American Medical Association) Code 84152 for complexed PSA and Code 84153 for total PSA, and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) code G0103 for total PSA testing. We did not use CPT code 84154 for free PSA because this test, unlike total or complexed PSA, is not initially used to screen for prostate cancer. If PSA test result is in the borderline range, usually considered 4.0–10.0 μg/L, free/total PSA ratio may be used to decide if a prostate biopsy is warranted.

2.2. Annual PSA testing rates

Annual rates for PSA testing in each calendar year were the proportion of the study population with ≥1 PSA test(s) per 12 months continuous enrollment after excluding those with any prostate‐related condition.

2.3. Annual percent change and PSA testing trends

Annual percent change (APC) was used to estimate the change in PSA test use. APC was estimated using joinpoint regression analysis, fitting trend data to identify the log‐linear model with the fewest number of inflection points.11 Therefore, the software used fits trend data using a regression model that minimizes the number of inflection points, and therefore the number of APC line segments. APC was the log‐linear slope of each trend line, and P values related to statistical significance of each APC estimate being different from zero.

2.4. Stratification scheme

We stratified the study population into different age groups: 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, and ≥85. For each age group, we further stratified data into the four US Census regions (https://www.census.gov/prod/1/gen/95statab/preface.pdf): Northeast (CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, and VT), Midwest (IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, OH, NE, ND, SD, and WI), South (AL, AR, DC, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, and WV), and West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, and WY). This stratification scheme was used to better understand the extent of overall and regional variation of PSA test use by age.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Included populations

The final study sample included 6.46–7.79 million men in each year from 1999 through 2015 after excluding men having encounter claims associated with prostate‐related diseases or conditions (see Methods). As the result of this exclusion, 66.5%–70.1% of men remained for analysis of PSA testing rates and trends.

3.2. Annual PSA testing rates and percent changes

Annual rate of PSA testing ranged from 10.1%–23.1% in men age ≥85 to 28.3%–36.9% in men age 70–74. PSA testing rate decreased by 2.9%, 13.9%, 29.9%, and 40.7%, respectively, for men age 70–74, 75–79, 80–84, and ≥80 from 1999 to 2015. However, testing rate increased by 0.3% for men age 65–69 from 1999 to 2015. Table 1 shows the range of annual PSA testing rate and annual percent change (APC) for men in each of these five groups.

TABLE 1.

Annual PSA testing rate and annual percent change (APC)

Age Testing rate APC Years P
65–69 26.4%–33.6% +1.0% 1999–2010 .10
−5.2% 2010–2015 .014
70–74 28.3%–36.9% +6.3% 1999–2002 .063
−6.6% 2002–2005 .27
+5.5% 2005–2008 .40
−3.2% 2008–2015 .007
75–79 23.8%–35.8% +9.6% 1999–2001 .24
−2.4% 2001–2015 <.001
80–84 16.6%–31.0% +7.0% 1999–2002 .053
−8.9% 2002–2005 .16
+3.6% 2005–2008 .59
−6.8% 2008–2015 <.001
≥85 10.1%–23.1% +8.1% 1999–2002 .029
−9.8% 2002–2005 .14
+1.0% 2005–2008 .87
−9.0% 2008–2015 <.001

3.3. Annual PSA testing trends for men age ≥65

There were significant downward trends in PSA testing rate for all age groups during the most recent years of the study period. For men ages 65–69 and 75–79, the APC was −5.2% from 2010 to 2015 (P = .014) and −2.4% from 2001 to 2015 (P < .001), respectively. For the other three age groups, the last APC line segment was from 2008 to 2015. The APC value was −3.2% in men age 70–74 (P = .007), and it was −6.8% and −9.0% in men ages 80–84 and ≥85, respectively (P < .001). There were three inflection points for all but two age groups, ages 65–69 and 75–79, for which we identified only one inflection point. The slopes of APC line segments alternated from positive to negative, starting positive and ending negative. The only other significant APC was for men age ≥85 from 1999 to 2002; the APC value was +8.1% (P = .029). The three inflection points for men ages 70–74, 80–84, and ≥85 all occurred in the same years: 2002, 2005, and 2008. The one inflection point for men ages 65–69 and 75–79 were in 2010 and 2001, respectively. The trends of annual PSA testing rates for men age ≥70, who should not be routinely screened for prostate cancer, are shown in three age groups of 70–74, 75–79, and 80–84 in Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Regional PSA testing trends are shown in Figure 4 for all male Medicare enrollees age ≥65.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Annual PSA testing rates and trend in men age 70–74. *APC is significantly different from zero (P < .05)

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Annual PSA testing rates and trend in men age 75–79. *APC is significantly different from zero (P < .05)

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Annual PSA testing rates and trend in men age 80–84. *APC is significantly different from zero (P < .05)

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Annual PSA testing rates and trend in men age ≥65 stratified by census region. *APC is significantly different from zero (P < .05)

Annual PSA testing rates and their trends in men age ≥65 are shown in Figure 4, after stratifying them by US Census region. In later years, the highest annual testing rates were seen in the South, while the lowest rates were in the West. Except for one region with one inflection point in 2009 (Midwest), the other three regions exhibited three inflection points. These occurred in 2001–2002, 2004–2005, and 2008–2009.

4. DISCUSSION

This study of Medicare claims data going back to 1999 shows that the PSA test has been used among men in all age groups over 65, including those 70 and older. Although the testing rate for this age group has been decreasing in the most recent years, the testing rate in 2015 still ranged from 10% for men age ≥85 to 28% for those age 70–74. Other studies have reported annual PSA testing rates for US men age ≥65 using electronic records (2002–2014),12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 claims data (2006–2013),20, 21, 22 and self‐reported data obtained from the CDC's National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) in 2000–201523, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Systems (BRFSS) in 2006–2012.34, 35, 36 All of these studies show that at least 20% of men age ≥70 have undergone PSA testing annually since 2000. Annual PSA testing rates and trends reported in these studies are consistent with our findings for 1999–2015. Our results, consistent with those previously reported, show an increase in PSA testing rate from 1999 to 200231; and after decreasing from 2002 to 2005, PSA testing rates exhibit an increase again from 2005 to 2008.29, 31 All studies, including ours, consistently show a significant decrease in PSA testing rate from 2008 to 2013–2015.12, 13, 15, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 31 Our study is unique, however, in that it is the only one that is based on the largest claims databases relating to men age ≥65 over the longest period of observation, from 1999 through 2015, while using the most comprehensive diagnostic list of prostate‐related conditions to exclude encounters that may be for PSA testing for purposes other than screening for prostate cancer. Most studies of PSA testing in these age groups are based on self‐reports, and the few claims‐based studies are limited to only a few years, and do not cover the entire Medicare population over such an extended period of time between 1999 to 2015 . Unique to this study is the exclusion of enrollees and PSA testing events associated with any prostate‐related diagnoses and procedures that may have been for purposes other than screening. Also unique to this study is the consistent regional differences in PSA testing rates between 1999 and 2015.

Most studies reporting on PSA testing rates in men age ≥70 have been based on self‐reported NHIS and BRFSS surveys.23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 Test utilization rates obtained from such surveys are, however, subject to recall, nonresponse and framing biases. Such rates obtained from claims data, on the other hand, are not subject to these biases. Nevertheless, testing events obtained from administrative databases cannot be equated to actual testing events because adjudicated and paid claims may not include some tests that were performed but not reimbursed. Despite this inherent limitation in using administrative databases to determine actual test utilization rate, claims data may provide more objective information than survey data. This is because test utilization rates obtained from claims databases are not subject to the aforementioned biases pertaining to NHIS and BRFSS surveys. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the only one based on nationwide claims data for men age ≥65 that encompass a 17‐year period from 1999 to 2015. Goodwin et al used Texas Medicare claims data for men age ≥75 in 2007 and 2010.20 Howard et al used national Medicare claims data for the same age group in 2006–2010, showing a 7.9% decrease in PSA testing from 2008 to 2010.21 Kim et al used claims data from Optum Lab Data Warehouse in 2008–2013, and demonstrated that PSA decreased significantly during this period.22 PSA testing rates obtained from electronic data in 2007–2014 also show decreasing PSA testing rates in men age ≥70.12, 13, 15 However, none of these studies cover the period from 1999 to 2015 for the entire Medicare populations of men age ≥65, while comprehensively excluding all encounters with diagnoses of any prostate‐related conditions.

Like Walter et al,18 we excluded, but more comprehensively, enrollees with encounter claims for PSA tests that may have been used for purposes other than screening, such as monitoring of those with a history of prostate cancer or other prostate‐related health conditions. However, despite the exclusion criteria applied, the current study may include some patients who received PSA testing for reasons other than screening. Because we do not know how commonly PSA tests are ordered for purposes other than screening in the included population, unlike other investigators,18, 24, 25, 26 we have equated captured claim events to PSA testing, and not to PSA‐based screening. After exclusion of claims associated with prostate‐related conditions, still 67%–70% of Medicare enrollees remained. Because PSA‐based screening is not expected to be performed more than once or at most twice per year, we used another claims database, MarketScan, and determined that the vast majority (97%–99%) of the included population had ≤2 PSA tests per year consistent with PSA testing being used for screening (unpublished observation).

There were consistent geographic differences in annual PSA testing rates in the four US Census regions, with the West exhibiting the lowest PSA testing rates (2003–2015) and the South showing the highest (2011–2015) in recent years. These findings are consistent with PSA testing rates we have observed for men age 55–64 from 2011 to 2017 using MarketScan claims data, showing that the highest PSA testing rates were in the South and the lowest rates in the West.37

In 2013, it was estimated that 1.4 million men age ≥65 with a >52% risk of 9‐year mortality were screened with the PSA test.24 In 2005, 31% of men with low‐life expectancy (>48% probability of death within 10 years) had a PSA‐based screening.25 In 2010, 34% of men age ≥75 with a >75% predicted 9‐year mortality were screened for prostate cancer with the PSA test.26 Approximately, 55% of screened men age ≥75 who had ≥53% predicted 9‐year mortality recalled discussing advantages of screening, whereas only 25% recalled discussing disadvantages. Given these data and the cost implication of PSA‐based screening,38, 39 effective strategies could be developed to decrease PSA‐based screening inconsistent with current recommendations. Trends data show, however, that the PSA testing rates are decreasing with advancing age for men age ≥70. Although individualized PSA testing with shared decision making is primarily advocated for men age 50/55 to 69, some providers may extend testing to men older than 69. Many clinicians may choose to personalize screening recommendations by conducting PSA testing in men age ≥70 with no significant comorbidities and a life expectancy of ≥10 years. Our analyses show how prevalent PSA screening is in different age groups of men age ≥70. Although the USPSTF does not include in their screening recommendations known risk factors other than age, such as race and family history, these may impact the decision to test for PSA. Determination of testing rate in higher‐risk groups, such as African American men, was outside the scope of this study. This may be an avenue for future investigation. However, a limitation of using Medicare claims data is that African American men constitute a small proportion of men age ≥70. PSA testing rates in the four census regions showed consistent differences among them over the years that can be influenced by various populations characteristics including risk factors, as well as regional differences in screening practices.

In summary, our analyses show that annual rate of PSA testing, likely done to screen for prostate cancer, has significantly decreased for all age groups from 2008 to 2015. PSA testing rate decreased with advancing age in men age ≥70. However, a substantial proportion of men age ≥70 still underwent PSA testing: from approximately 10% in men age ≥85 in 2015 to 28% in men age 70–74. These findings may have implications for better use of the PSA test in clinical practice. To do so, future research could help to understand why PSA tests continue to be ordered for men age ≥70, many with <10 years of life expectancy. Ordering of a laboratory test is a pre‐analytic component of the total testing process, and appropriate laboratory test utilization is a vital component of laboratory quality and diagnostic excellence. Continued monitoring could show if the decreasing trend in PSA testing continues in alignment with current evidence‐based recommendations against routine PSA‐based screening of men age ≥70.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Shahram Shahangian: concept and design of the study, data analysis, interpretation of data, drafting of the initial manuscript, review and revision of the manuscript, approval of the final manuscript as submitted, and accountability for all aspects of the work. Lin Fan and Krishna P. Sharma: concept of the study, data curation, interpretation of data, review and revision of the manuscript, approval of the final manuscript as submitted, and accountability for all aspects of the work. David A. Siegel: concept of the study, interpretation of data, review and revision of the manuscript, approval of the final manuscript as submitted, and accountability for all aspects of the work.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Institutional clearance and approval was obtained prior to submission.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC.

Code Source Description
60.21 ICD‐9 Transurethral ultrasound‐guided, laser induced prostatectomy
60.29 ICD‐9 Other transurethral prostatectomy
60.3 ICD‐9 Suprapubic/transvesical prostatectomy
60.4 ICD‐9 Retropubic prostatectomy
60.61 ICD‐9 Local excision of lesion of prostate
60.62 ICD‐9 Perineal prostatectomy; cryoablation of prostate; cryoprostatectomy and surgery of prostate
60.69 ICD‐9 Other operations on prostate and seminal vesicles
185.0 ICD‐9 Malignant neoplasm of prostate
222.2 ICD‐9 Benign neoplasm of prostate
233.4 ICD‐9 Carcinoma in situ of prostate
236.5 ICD‐9 Neoplasm of uncertain behavior of prostate
600.00 ICD‐9 Benign hypertrophy of prostate without urinary obstruction and other LUTS
600.01 ICD‐9 Benign hypertrophy of prostate with urinary obstruction and other LUTS
600.10 ICD‐9 Nodular prostate without urinary obstruction
600.11 ICD‐9 Nodular prostate with urinary obstruction
600.20 ICD‐9 Benign localized hyperplasia of prostate without urinary obstruction and other LUTS
600.21 ICD‐9 Benign localized hyperplasia of prostate with urinary obstruction and other LUTS
600.90 ICD‐9 Hyperplasia of prostate, unspecified, without urinary obstruction and other LUTS
600.91 ICD‐9 Hyperplasia of prostate, unspecified, with urinary obstruction and other LUTS
601.0 ICD‐9 Acute prostatitis
601.1 ICD‐9 Chronic prostatitis
601.2 ICD‐9 Abscess of prostate
601.3 ICD‐9 Prostatocystitis
601.4 ICD‐9 Prostatitis in diseases classified elsewhere
601.8 ICD‐9 Other specified inflammatory diseases of prostate
601.9 ICD‐9 Prostatitis, unspecified
602.0 ICD‐9 Calculus of prostate
602.1 ICD‐9 Congestion or hemorrhage of prostate
602.3 ICD‐9 Dysplasia of prostate
602.8 ICD‐9 Other specified disorders of prostate
602.9 ICD‐9 Unspecified disorder of prostate
790.93 ICD‐9 Elevated PSA
55801 ICD‐9 Perineal subtotal prostatectomy
55810 CPT Perineal radical prostatectomy
55812 CPT Perineal radical prostatectomy with lymph node biopsies
55815 CPT Perineal radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy
55821 CPT Suprapubic, subtotal prostatectomy
55831 CPT Retropubic, subtotal prostatectomy
55840 CPT Retropubic radical prostatectomy with or without nerve sparing
55842 CPT Retropubic radical prostatectomy with or without nerve sparing with lymph node biopsies
55845 CPT Retropubic radical prostatectomy with(out) nerve sparing/lymph node biopsies with lymphadenectomy
55866 CPT Laparoscopy, retropubic radical prostatectomy including nerve sparing/robotic assistance

Abbreviations: CPT, current procedural terminology; ICD, International Classification of Disease; LUTS, lower urinary tract symptom.

Shahangian S, Fan L, Sharma KP, Siegel DA. Use of the prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) test in the United States for men age ≥65, 1999–2015: Implications for practice interventions. Cancer Reports. 2021;4:e1352. 10.1002/cnr2.1352

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for prostate cancer. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996:119‐134. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Harris R, Lohr KN. Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:917‐929. 10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:185‐191. 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:120‐134. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force . Draft recommendation statement: Screening for prostate cancer 2017.
  • 6.US Preventive Services Task Force , Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2018;319:1901‐1913. 10.1001/jama.2018.3710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carter HB, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2013;190:419‐426. 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119 Epub 2013 May 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Qaseem A, Barry MJ, Denberg TD, Owens DK, Shekelle P. Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Screening for prostate cancer: a guideline statement from the Clinical Guideline Committee of the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:761‐769. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smith RA, Andrews K, Brooks D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:96‐114. 10.3322/caac.21336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shahangian S. Effectiveness of cancer screening tests: controversies surrounding prostate cancer screening. Adv Admin Lab. 2002;49‐53. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.National Institutes of Health . Joinpoint trend analysis software. https://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint Accessed March 31, 2021.
  • 12.Aslani A, Minnillo BJ, Johnson B, Cherullo EE, Ponsky LE, Abouassaly R. The impact of recent recommendations on prostate cancer screening in a large health care system. J Urol. 2014;191:1737‐1742. 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cohn JA, Wang CE, Lakeman JC, et al. Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Urol Oncol. 2014:32:e23‐e30. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Aug 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hutchinson R, Akhtar A, Haridas J, Bhat D, Roehrborn C, Lotan Y. Testing and referral patterns in the years surrounding the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against prostate‐specific antigen screening. Cancer. 2016;122:3785‐3793. 10.1002/cncr.30330 Epub 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Misra‐Hebert AD, Hu B, Klein EA, et al. Prostate cancer screening practices in a large integrated health system: 2007‐2014. BJU Int. 2017;120:257‐264. 10.1111/bju.13793 Epub 2017 Feb 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.So C, Kirby KA, Mehta K, et al. Medical center characteristics associated with PSA screening in elderly veterans with limited life expectancy. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:653‐660. 10.1007/s11606-011-1945-9 Epub 2011 Dec 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tang VL, Shi S, Fung K, et al. Clinician factors associated with prostate‐specific antigen screening in older veterans with limited life expectancy. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:654‐661. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, Konety BR. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296:2336‐2342. 10.1001/jama.296.19.2336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zeliadt SB, Hoffman RM, Etzioni R, Gore JL, Kessler LG, Lin DW. Influence of publication of US and European prostate cancer screening trials on PSA testing practices. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:520‐523. 10.1093/jnci/djr007 Epub 2011 Feb 28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goodwin JS, Jaramillo E, Yang L, Kuo YF, Tan A. Is anyone listening? Variation in PSA screening among providers for men 75+ before and after United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against it: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107352. 10.1371/journal.pone.0107352 eCollection 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Howard DH, Tangka FK, Guy GP, Ekwueme DU, Lipscomb J. Prostate cancer screening in men ages 75 and older fell by 8 percentage points after Task Force recommendation. Health Aff. 2013;32:596‐602. 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim SP, Karnes RJ, Gross CP, et al. Contemporary national trends of prostate cancer screening among privately insured men in the United States. Urology. 2016;97:111‐117. 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.067 Epub 2016 Aug 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berkowitz Z, Li J, Richards TB, Marcus PM. Patterns of prostate‐specific antigen test use in the U.S., 2005‐2015. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53:909‐913. 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.003 Epub 2017 Oct 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Drazer MW, Huo D, Eggener SE. National prostate cancer screening rates after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation discouraging prostate‐specific antigen‐based screening. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2416‐2423. 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6532 Epub 2015 Jun 8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Drazer MW, Huo D, Schonberg MA, Razmaria A, Eggener SE. Population‐based patterns and predictors of prostate‐specific antigen screening among older men in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1736‐1743. 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9004 Epub 2011 Mar 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Drazer MW, Prasad SM, Huo D, et al. National trends in prostate cancer screening among older American men with limited 9‐year life expectancies: evidence of an increased need for shared decision making. Cancer. 2014;120:1491‐1498. 10.1002/cncr.28600 Epub 2014 Feb 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fedewa SA, Ward EM, Brawley O, Jemal A. Recent patterns of prostate‐specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1040‐1042. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Houston KA, King J, Li J, Jemal A. Trends in prostate cancer incidence rates and prevalence of prostate specific antigen screening by socioeconomic status and regions in the United States, 2004 to 2013. J Urol. 2018;199:676‐682. 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.103 Epub 2017 Sep 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jemal A, Fedewa SA, Ma J, et al. Prostate cancer incidence and PSA testing patterns in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations. JAMA. 2015;314:2054‐2061. 10.1001/jama.2015.14905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li J, Berkowitz Z, Hall IJ. Decrease in prostate cancer testing following the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28:491‐493. 10.3122/jabfm.2015.04.150062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Negoita S, Feuer EJ, Mariotto A, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part II: recent changes in prostate cancer trends and disease characteristics. Cancer. 2018;124:2801‐2804. 10.1002/cncr.31549 Epub 2018 May 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ross LE, Coates RJ, Breen N, Uhler RJ, Potosky AL, Blackman D. Prostate‐specific antigen test use reported in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 2004;38:732‐744. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Royce TJ, Hendrix LH, Stokes WA, Allen IM, Chen RC. Cancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectancies. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1558‐1565. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li J, Zhao G, Pollack LA, Smith JL, Joseph DA. Use of the prostate‐specific antigen test among men aged 75 years or older in the United States: 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7:A84 Epub 2010 Jun 15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sammon JD, Pucheril D, Diaz M, et al. Contemporary nationwide patterns of self‐reported prostate‐specific antigen screening. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1839‐1841. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Scosyrev E, Wu G, Golijanin D, Messing E. Prostate‐specific antigen testing in older men in the USA: data from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. BJU Int. 2012;110:1485‐1490. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11013.x Epub 2012 Mar 27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shahangian S, Sharma KP, Fan L, Siegel DA. Use of the prostate‐specific antigen test in the U.S. for men age 30 to 64 in 2011 to 2017 using a large commercial claims database: Implications for practice interventions. Cancer Rep. 2021; 10.1002/cnr2.1365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aizer AA, Cu X, Chen MH, et al. Cost implications and complications of overtreatment of low‐risk prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:61‐68. 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ma X, Wang R, Long JB, et al. The cost implications of prostate cancer screening in the Medicare population. Cancer. 2014;120:96‐102. 10.1002/cncr.28373 Epub 2013 Oct 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Cancer Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES