Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Aug 26;10(34):e00636-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00636-21

Genome Sequences of Bacteriophages cd2, cd3, and cd4, which Specifically Target Carnobacterium divergens

Peipei Zhang a, Angelle P Britton b,*, Kaitlyn A Visser b, Catherine A Welke b, Heather Wassink b, Erica Prins b, Xianqin Yang a, Leah A Martin-Visscher b,
Editor: Kenneth M Stedmanc
PMCID: PMC8388549  PMID: 34435863

ABSTRACT

Carnobacteria have been implicated in food spoilage, but also in protection against pathogenic bacteria. We report the isolation and complete genome sequences of three bacteriophages (phages cd2, cd3, and cd4) that specifically target Carnobacterium divergens. The genome sizes are approximately 57 kbp and have limited homology to known enterococcal and streptococcal phages.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Carnobacterium divergens are lactic acid bacteria (LAB) commonly found in foods, particularly dairy, meat, fish, and shrimp (1, 2). Previously, it was thought that high bacterial loads of these organisms resulted in food spoilage (2, 3); however, recent reports suggest that the volatile organic compounds produced by carnobacteria have a negligible impact on food quality (4). Moreover, since carnobacteria produce antimicrobial peptides (bacteriocins) and organic acids, they can act as protective cultures by inhibiting the growth of food spoilage or pathogenic bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes (5, 6). Within the food industry, bacteriophages pose a major threat to LAB that function as starter cultures for fermentation processes or protective cultures; as such, phages targeting LAB have been extensively studied (79). However, phages infecting carnobacteria are underrepresented in this field of study, and very few bacteriophages targeting Carnobacterium spp. have been reported (10, 11). Here, we report the complete genome sequences of three lytic bacteriophages (cd2, cd3, and cd4) that target various C. divergens strains.

Bacteriophages cd2 and cd3 were isolated from minced beef, and cd4 was isolated from ham, all purchased at a grocery store in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (Table 1). In each case, a 1-g sample of meat was added to 10 ml of brain heart infusion broth (Bacto) and incubated overnight at 25°C. Following centrifugation (9,000 × g, 5 min, 4°C), the supernatant was filter-sterilized (0.2-μm filter) and used to prepare crude phage suspensions (11), using C. divergens LV13 (12) as the host strain. Purified suspensions of each bacteriophage were prepared using three consecutive rounds of single-plaque isolation using C. divergens LV13 as the host strain. Additionally, C. divergens B1 (6) was used to propagate and isolate phages cd2 and cd3.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the assembled phage genomes

Isolate Recovery source Total no. of forward/reverse reads Estimated coverage by trimmed reads (×) Assembled genome size (bp) GC content (%) No. of contigs No. of ORFsa GenBank accession no.
SRA Genome
cd2 Minced beef 94,533 594.7 57,220 39.0 1 111 SRR14848713 MZ398135
cd3 Minced beef 129,946 788.9 57,171 38.9 1 110 SRR14848712 MZ398136
cd4 Ham 97,629 604.2 56,713 38.7 1 109 SRR14848711 MZ399596
a

ORFs, open reading frames.

Phage DNA was isolated using a proteinase K and SDS treatment, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation (13). Libraries were constructed using a Nextera XT DNA library prep kit and sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq PE250 platform. Sequencing reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.39 (14), where reads with an average quality score of a 4-base sliding window of <30 and length of <100 were subsequently removed. Genomes were assembled using SPAdes v3.14.0 (15) with kmers set at 21, 33, 55, 77, 99, and 127 bp. Contigs with a length of <500 bp or coverage of <10 were removed using a Python script (16). The genomes were predicted to be circularly permuted using PhageTerm v1.0.11 (17). Genomes were annotated with PHANOTATE v1.5.0 (18) using the default settings.

Table 1 lists the characteristics of the phage genomes. Using OAT v0.9 (19), the phages were found to have average orthologous nucleotide identities of 98.3 to 99.8% with each other. A BLASTN (20) search of the genomes against the nucleotide database in NCBI did not find closely related bacteriophages, as the top 10 matched nucleotide sequences displayed limited coverage (<5%) and identity (<75%). Analysis with ViPTree (21) suggests that the three phage strains belong to the Siphoviridae family and have limited homology to several enterococcal bacteriophages, including VD13 (22), vB_EfaS_IME198, IME-EF1 (23), SAP6 (24), BC-611 (25), and Streptococcus phage SP-QS1.

Data availability.

Sequencing data for bacteriophages cd2, cd3, and cd4 are available in GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA738531. The accession numbers for the sequencing reads and genomes are listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2014-05457) and the NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Award (USRA) program.

We thank Sophie Dang from the Molecular Biology Service Unit for her assistance with sequencing.

Contributor Information

Leah A. Martin-Visscher, Email: leah.martin-visscher@kingsu.ca.

Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rieder G, Krisch L, Fischer H, Kaufmann M, Maringer A, Wessler S. 2012. Carnobacterium divergens: a dominating bacterium of pork meat juice. FEMS Microbiol Lett 332:122–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02584.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Leisner JJ, Laursen BG, Prévost H, Drider D, Dalgaard P. 2007. Carnobacterium: positive and negative effects in the environment and in foods. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:592–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00080.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Laursen BG, Leisner JJ, Dalgaard P. 2006. Carnobacterium species: effect of metabolic activity and interaction with Brochothrix thermosphacta on sensory characteristics of modified atmosphere packed shrimp. J Agric Food Chem 54:3604–3611. doi: 10.1021/jf053017f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Casaburi A, Nasi A, Ferrocino I, Di Monaco R, Mauriello G, Villani F, Ercolini D. 2011. Spoilage-related activity of Carnobacterium maltaromaticum strains in air-stored and vacuum-packed meat. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:7382–7393. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05304-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mills S, Ross RP, Hill C. 2017. Bacteriocins and bacteriophage; a narrow-minded approach to food and gut microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:S129–S153. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang P, Gänzle M, Yang X. 2019. Complementary antibacterial effects of bacteriocins and organic acids as revealed by comparative analysis of Carnobacterium spp. from meat. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01227-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01227-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pujato SA, Quiberoni A, Mercanti DJ. 2019. Bacteriophages on dairy foods. J Appl Microbiol 126:14–30. doi: 10.1111/jam.14062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mc Grath S, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D. 2007. Bacteriophages in dairy products: pros and cons. Biotechnol J 2:450–455. doi: 10.1002/biot.200600227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Garneau JE, Moineau S. 2011. Bacteriophages of lactic acid bacteria and their impact on milk fermentations. Microb Cell Fact 10(Suppl 1):S20. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chibani-Chennoufi S, Dillmann M-L, Marvin-Guy L, Rami-Shojaei S, Brüssow H. 2004. Lactobacillus plantarum bacteriophage LP65: a new member of the SPO1-like genus of the family Myoviridae. J Bacteriol 186:7069–7083. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.21.7069-7083.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manchester LN. 1997. Characterization of a bacteriophage for Carnobacterium divergens NCFB 2763 by host specificity and electron microscopy. Lett Appl Microbiol 25:401–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1997.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ahn C, Stiles ME. 1990. Plasmid-associated bacteriocin production by a strain of Carnobacterium piscicola from meat. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2503–2510. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.8.2503-2510.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sambrook J, Russell D. 2006. Extraction of bacteriophage λ DNA from large-scale cultures using proteinase K and SDS. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2006:pdb.prot3972. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot3972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Douglass AP, O’Brien CE, Offei B, Coughlan AY, Ortiz-Merino RA, Butler G, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2019. Coverage-versus-length plots, a simple quality control step for de novo yeast genome sequence assemblies. G3:879–887. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McNair K, Zhou C, Dinsdale EA, Souza B, Edwards RA. 2019. PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes. Bioinformatics 35:4537–4542. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. 2016. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen Y, Ye W, Zhang Y, Xu Y. 2015. High speed BLASTN: an accelerated MegaBLAST search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 43:7762–7768. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nishimura Y, Yoshida T, Kuronishi M, Uehara H, Ogata H, Goto S. 2017. ViPTree: the viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics 33:2379–2380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Denes T, Vongkamjan K, Ackermann H-W, Moreno Switt AI, Wiedmann M, den Bakker HC. 2014. Comparative genomic and morphological analyses of Listeria phages isolated from farm environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:4616–4625. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00720-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang W, Mi Z, Yin X, Fan H, An X, Zhang Z, Chen J, Tong Y. 2013. Characterization of Enterococcus faecalis phage IME-EF1 and its endolysin. PLoS One 8:e80435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee Y-D, Park J-H. 2012. Complete genome sequence of enterococcal bacteriophage SAP6. J Virol 86:5402–5403. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00321-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Horiuchi T, Sakka M, Hayashi A, Shimada T, Kimura T, Sakka K. 2012. Complete genome sequence of bacteriophage BC-611 specifically infecting Enterococcus faecalis strain NP-10011. J Virol 86:9538–9539. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01424-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Sequencing data for bacteriophages cd2, cd3, and cd4 are available in GenBank under BioProject number PRJNA738531. The accession numbers for the sequencing reads and genomes are listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES