COVID-19 Prevention Practices and Determinant Factors Among Healthcare Professionals Working in Hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a global public health crisis since December 2019. Health care professionals (HCP) are highly vulnerable for contracting the disease. Due to the absence of known treatment, prevention is the best option for controlling its transmission.

Objective

The study aimed to assess COVID-19 prevention practices and determinant factors among HCP working in hospitals of South Gondar ZoneH, Northwestern Ethiopia.

Methods

Institution-based cross-sectional study design was used from July 1 to 30, 2020 among 372 HCPs. The participants were selected on random sampling technique basis. Data were entered into Epi data version 3.1 and exported to Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS V.25) software for data cleaning and analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between independent variables and prevention practice of COVID-19.

Results

A total of 372 HCPs participated in the study with a response rate of 94.9%. Less than one-third 112 (30.1%) of the participants were females. About 308 (82.8%), 285 (76.6%), and 224 (60.2%) of the participants had good knowledge, positive attitude, and good prevention practice towards COVID-19, respectively. Being male (AOR =2.68; 95% CI (confidence interval): 1.50,4.81), 2–5 years working experience (AOR= 4.61; 95% CI: 1.70,12.47), greater than five years working experience (AOR= 5.86; 95% CI: 2.01,17.05), age of 31–40 years old (AOR= 2.49; 95% CI; 1.41,4.41), above 40 years (AOR= 6.94; 95% CI: 2.33–20.71), use of COVID-19 guideline (AOR= 4.79; 95% CI: 2.17–10.53), and using peers as sources of information about COVID-19 (AOR= 2.06; 95% CI: 1.07–3.94) were factors of COVID-19 prevention practices.

Conclusion

Less than two-thirds of the participants had good COVID-19 prevention practices. Sex, work experience, age, use of COVID-19 guideline, and using peers as sources of information were factors of COVID-19 prevention practices. Hence, continuous information dissemination and experience sharing on COVID-19 prevention should be done continuously.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a communicable respiratory disease caused by a new strain of coronavirus of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) that causes illness in humans.¹ Healthcare professionals (HCP) are part of the frontline in the struggle against COVID-19.² The disease was initially reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.^3–5 COVID-19 was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020.⁶

The disease transmits through droplets, airborne transmission, and contact between humans during airway maneuvers when a patient is infected, especially during tracheal intubation. Fever, dry cough, weakness, myalgia, shortness of breath, and dyspnoea are the common signs and symptoms of COVID-19 infection.⁷ Elders and patients with chronic medical conditions like hypertension, cardiac disease, lung disease, cancer, or diabetes have been identified as potential risk factors for disease severity and mortality. Although successful treatment is not developed yet, early identification of symptoms and timely seeking of supportive care enhances recovery from illness.⁸

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are part of the frontline in the struggle against the disease.² They are highly vulnerable to SARS-COV-2 infection due to their clinical role in the healthcare settings.⁶ The problem is severe mainly in low and middle-income countries where the health care facilities were overburdened before the occurrence of the pandemic by routine activities.⁹ Therefore, in such areas addressing shortages of hospital beds, oxygen, ventilators, and personal protective equipment (PPE) as primary response measures might not be feasible.¹⁰ They are usually working in isolation units, critical care units, intensive care units (ICUs), emergency units, working in frontline positions, and having contact with suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19.⁶ According to WHO report as of May 21, 2021 an estimated of more than 115,000 HCPs have paid the ultimate value in the service of others.¹¹

As of July 13, 2021, 12.25 pm, COVID-19 has spread to more than 222 countries and a total of 188,119,516 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were reported globally. Of these, 172,052,948 had recovered while 4,056,847 had died due to the disease.¹² The first case of the disease in Ethiopia was reported on March 13 2020.^13,14 Since then a total of 277,137 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were reported as of July 13, 2021. Of these, 262,022 had recovered while 4343 persons had died due to the disease.¹⁵

Microorganism contamination of healthcare workers’ hands contributes to the spread of Hospital acquired infections (HAIs) in hospital settings, and errors in hygiene procedures are at the base of self-contamination. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) measures have been implemented to reduce nosocomial infection.^16,17 Guidelines for healthcare workers and online refreshment training have been developed by WHO, CDC, and various governmental organizations in various countries to boost the knowledge and prevention practices of COVID-19.¹⁸ Furthermore, use of facemasks, respiratory hygiene, stay of at home are also implemented as prevention measures.¹

HCPs implement different COVID-19 prevention practices. A study conducted in Ethiopia showed that majority of them used handwashing with water and soap or alcohol-based hand rub and wearing of face masks. But, lower number of HCPs cover their mouth and nose while sneezing and properly disposed of mouth covering materials, avoid hand shaking, avoid touching of eye, nose, and mouth by unwashed hands, and avoid travelling to a crowded place as prevention measures.¹⁹ Another study also supported that wearing of face masks and restricting from going to crowded place were implemented as prevention measures.²⁰

Different scholars revealed that the COVID-19 prevention practice is affected by different factors. A study conducted in Ethiopia showed that sex education level^20,21 profession, service year, availability of personal protective equipment, and knowledge level were factors of COVID-19 prevention practices.^19–21 In addition to these, residence, health facility type, access to infection prevention (IP) training, presence of IP guidelines, having chronic illness, lack of personal protective equipments, and high work loads were factors of COVID-19 prevention practices.¹⁹ Furthermore, attitude of the HCPs was another factor of COVID-19 prevention practices.²⁰

Although different prevention measures are implemented against the transmission of the COVID-19, the number of new cases registered across the world is not reduced to the expected level. HCPs are the most exposed groups for contracting the disease. As a result, frequent assessment of the COVID-19 prevention practices among HCPs plays a vital role in reducing the transmission of the disease.²² Therefore, the study aimed to assess prevention practices towards COVID-19 and determinant factors among HCPs working in the hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia.

Materials and Methods

Study Design, Period, and Setting

An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted among HCPs working in the hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia from July 1 to 30, 2020. South Gondar is one of the 13 administrative zones in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Debre Tabor is the capital city of the South Gondar Zone which is located 597 km away from Addis Ababa. Based on the central statistical agency (CSA) 2007 of Ethiopia, the total population of the South Gondar Zone was 2,051,738.^23,24 The zone has one general hospital, seven district hospitals, and 93 health centers.²⁴ According to the report of South Gondar Zone health department, there were more than 2500 registered HCPs available during data collection.

Source and Study Population

All HCPs who were working in hospitals of the South Gondar zone at the time of data collection were the source population whereas all HCPs who were working in three randomly selected hospitals (Debre Tabor, Mekane Eyesus, and Andabet) were the study population.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All clinical staff, namely, medical doctors, nurses, pharmacists, midwives, anesthetics, health officers, and medical laboratory professionals were included in the study. HCPs who were critically ill, did not volunteer to participate, and were absent during the data collection were excluded from the study.

Sample Size Determination

The sample size was determined using the single population proportion formula considering the following assumptions.

Z_α/2 is the standard normal variable value at (1-α) % confidence level (α is 0.05 with 95% CI, Z_α/2 = 1.96), an estimate of the proportion of good COVID-19 prevention practices, 63.5% taken from other study conducted in Ethiopia²² and margin of error, 5%. As a result, the sample size becomes 356, and with adding of 10% non-response rate, the final sample size becomes 392.

Sampling Techniques and Procedures

After selecting the three hospitals randomly out of the eight hospitals, we proportionally allocated a sample size based on HCPs available during the data collection time. Hence, 225 samples were collected from Debre Tabor general hospital, 87 from Mekane Eyesus, and the remaining 60 samples were collected from Andabet hospital. The participants were selected randomly using the lottery method by taking the lists of all HCPs from a human resource office of their respective hospitals.

Outcome and Explanatory Variables

The outcome variable was COVID-19 prevention practices (good/poor). The explanatory variables were socio-demographic variables of the respondents, knowledge about COVID-19, behavioral variables, pre-existing medical condition, and sources of information towards COVID-19.

Operational Definitions

HCPs

Any member of the health care unit that includes medical doctor, pharmacist, physiotherapist, or nursing professions or any other person who in the course of his or her professional activities who may prescribe, administer, or dispense a medicinal product to an end-user.²⁵

Knowledge

Knowledge was measured using 16 questions consisting of signs and symptoms, risk groups and prognosis, method of transmission, and prevention methods of COVID-19. Each question was responded as either yes or no. Respondents who answered correctly were given 1 point while others were given 0 points. The total knowledge score ranges from 0 to 16 and a cut-off level of ≥12 (75% and above) was considered as having  good knowledge while <12 (75%) was considered as having poor knowledge.²⁶

Attitude

The attitude was measured using 14 items and the response was categorized based on 3 scale measurements with agree (3 points), neutral (2 points), and disagree (1 point). The total score of attitude varies from 14 to 42, with an overall mean score of ≥34 (80%) was considered as a positive attitude while less than <34 (80%) was considered as a negative attitude towards COVID-19.

Preventin Practices

The prevention practices was measured using 12 items and those who respond as yes were given 1 point while no was marked as 0 values. The total prevention practices score ranges from 0 to 12 and a score with a cut-off ≥9 (75%) was considered as having a good prevention practices while <9 (75%) was considered as a poor prevention practices towards COVID-19.^27,28

Data Collection, Management, and Quality Assurance

The data were collected using a validated structured questionnaire which was adapted from published articles, other related literatures, and WHO guidelines.^29–34 The questionnaire consists of four sections including: socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and sources of information towards COVID-19 (Supplementary Table 1), knowledge towards COVID-19 (Supplementary Table 2), attitude of HCPs towards COVID-19 (Supplementary Table 3) and prevention practices of COVID-19 (Supplementary Table 4). The questionnaire was prepared in the English version and translated to the native language (Amharic) and re-translated back to English to ensure consistency. A pre-test was conducted using 5% of the sample size in Central Gondar zone hospital (Belesa district hospital) to establish the validity of the questionnaire, and amendment was done accordingly. Two days of training was given to data collectors and supervisors on the objective of the study and on the overall contents of the questionnaire. The data were collected by three BSc nurse professionals using a self-administered questionnaire. Supervision was carried out on a daily basis, and appropriate corrections were taken timely. Furthermore, double data entry was done to control data entry errors. The reliability coefficient of Cronbach’s alpha was 0.74 which is an acceptable range.

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered using Epi-Data version 3.1 and exported to the Statistical Package of the Social Science (SPSS) version 25.0 software for data cleaning and analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentage were used for categorical variables whereas mean and standard deviations for continuous variables. Bivariable (crude odds ratio [COR]) and multivariable (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]) were determined using binary logistic regression at 95% Confidence Interval (CI). In the bivariable analysis, variables with p <0.25 were entered for multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, variables with a significance level of p <0.05 were taken as statistically significant at 95% CI and independently associated with the prevention practice of HCPs towards COVID-19. The presence of multi-collinearity among independent variables was checked using standard error at the cutoff value of -/+ 2 and the maximum standard error was 1.25. Model fitness was checked using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test, which had a p-value of 0.86, showing the model was fit.

Ethical Consideration

This study was conducted in accordance with Helsinki Declaration. The study was approved by the ethical review committee of the College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University with a reference number of HSC2087/2012. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from the respective hospitals. Prior to the data collection, the overall aim of the study was explained for data collectors and the supervisors. The participation in the study was based on their voluntary decision. Prior to the data collection, written consent was obtained from each particiant. Those who volunteered to participate in the study were informed that they had the option to withdraw from the study at any stage. The confidentiality of the study participants were ensured by avoiding possible identifiers (Supplementary File).

Results

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents

A total of 372 HCPs participated in the study with a response rate of 94.9%. The majority of the respondents were males, 31–40 years old, married, and orthodox with 260 (69.9%), 172 (46.2%), 232 (62.4%), and 302 (81.2%), respectively. Nearly one-third, 120 (32.3%) of HCPs were nurses and a similar number of HCPs took training towards COVID-19. Furthermore, less than a quarter 88 (23.7%) of the HCPs reported that there was a sufficient PPE supply (Table 1).

Table 1.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Health Care Professionals Working in Hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia in July 1-30, 2020 (n=372)

Variables	Category	Frequency	Percentage
Sex	Male	260	69.9
	Female	112	30.1
Age of respondent Mean ±sd (33.1±6.17)	20–30	156	41.9
	31–40	172	46.2
	41 and above	44	11.8
Marital status	Single	107	28.8
	Married	232	62.3
	Divorced	33	8.9
Religion	Orthodox	302	81.2
	Protestant	36	9.7
	Muslim	34	9.1
Educational status	Specialist	48	12.9
	General practitioner	44	11.8
	Master	44	11.8
	Degree	180	48.4
	Diploma	56	15.1
Work experience in years	Greater than 5	226	60.8
	2–5 years	106	28.5
	Less than two	40	10.7
Income of the respondent (ETB) Mean (6329.13±2164.57)	<3500	36	9.7
	3501–500	104	27.9
	>5000	232	62.4
Profession	Physician	99	26.6
	Midwifery	36	9.7
	Nurse	120	32.2
	Laboratory technologist	40	10.7
	Pharmacist	24	6.5
	Anaesthetics	33	8.9
	Others*	20	5.4
Training on covid 19	Yes	120	32.3
	No	252	67.7
Presence of covid guideline	Yes	96	25.8
	No	276	74.2
Presence of sufficient PPE	Yes	88	23.7
	No	284	76.3
History of chronic illness	Yes	72	19.4
	No	300	80.6
Use of social media as sources of information towards COVID-19	Yes	335	90.1
	No	37	9.9
Use of telephone as sources of data	Yes	252	67.7
	No	120	32.3
Peers as a source of COVID-19	Yes	200	53.8
	No	172	46.2
Use of religious institution for COVID-19	Yes	124	33.3
	No	248	66.7

Notes: *Health officer, psychiatrist, and radiologist.

Knowledge of HCPs About COVID-19 Prevention

More than three-quarter, 308 (82.8%; 95% CI: 79.0–86.8%) of the HCPs had good knowledge while the remaining 64 (17.2%; 95% CI: 13.2–21.0%) had a poor knowledge about COVID-19. The overall mean knowledge score of the respondents was 12.16±1.69. All respondents replied that dyspnea was a major sign and symptom of COVID-19 followed by dry cough and fever with 368 (98.8%). Similarly, 328 (88.2%) of the respondents knew that the elderly and peoples with chronic medical illnesses are at higher risk of developing severe cases of COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, two-thirds 248 (66.7%) of the respondents knew that persons with COVID-19 virus can transmit the virus to others even in the absence of fever. Less than two-thirds 224 (60.2%) of the HCPs knew that children and young adults should take necessary measures to prevent COVID-19 infection (Table 2).

Table 2.

Knowledge About COVID-19 Among Healthcare Professionals Working in Hospitals of South Gondar Zone, North Western Ethiopia in July 2020 (n=372)

Knowledge Related Item		Yes		No
		Frequency	%	Frequency	%
Dry cough is signs and symptoms of COVID-19		368*	98.9	4	2.1
Fever is signs and symptoms of COVID-19		368*	98.9	4	2.1
Dyspnoea is signs and symptoms of COVID-19		372*	100	0	0
Myalgia is signs and symptoms of COVID-19		236*	63.4	136	36.6
Diarrhoea is signs and symptoms of COVID-19		152*	40.9	220	59.1
Stuffy nose, runny nose, and sneezing are less common in persons infected with the COVID-19 virus		252*	67.7	120	32.3
Currently no effective cure for COVID-19 but early symptomatic and supportive treatments can help most patients recover from the infection.		344*	92.5	28	7.5
Elderly, who have a chronic illness and obese are more likely to develop severe cases of COVID-19.		328*	88.2	44	11.8
Eating or contacting wild animals would result in infection by the COVID-19 virus		216*	58.1	156	41.9
Persons with COVID 19 virus cannot transmit the virus to others when a fever is not present		248	66.7	124*	33.3
COVID 19 viruses can spread via respiratory droplets of infected individuals		352*	94.6	20	5.4
Wearing general medical masks can prevent one from acquiring infection by the COVID 19 virus		236*	63.4	136	36.6
It is not necessary for children and young adults to take measures to prevent the infection by COVID 19 virus		224	60.2	148*	39.8
We can prevent COVID-19 by avoiding going to crowded places like bus station and transportation		348*	93.5	24	6.5
Isolation and treatment of people who are infected with the COVID-19 virus are effective ways to reduce the spread of the virus		340*	91.4	32	8.6
People who have contact with someone infected with the COVID-19 virus should be immediately isolated in a proper place for 14 days		340*	91.4	32	8.6
Knowledge	Score
Good knowledge	308 (82.8%)
Poor knowledge	64 (17.2%)
Range	(8–16)
Mean ±SD	(12.16±1.7)

Note: *Correct response.

Attitude of HCPs Towards COVID-19 Prevention

This finding revealed that about three-fourths 285 (76.6%; 95% CI: 71.8–80.6%) of the respondents had a positive attitude while 87 (23.4%; 95% CI: 19.4–28.2%) respondents had a negative attitude towards COVID-19 prevention. Less than one-third 113 (30.4%) of the respondents agreed that black race was not protected against the infection of COVID-19. Furthermore, less than a quarter, 85 (22.8%) of the participants agreed that Ethiopia is in a good position to control the transmission of COVID-19 within a short time. Similarly, less than two-thirds, 230 (61.8%) of the respondents agreed that COVID-19 is not a stigma and they should not hide their infection if they contract COVID-19. Furthermore, nearly one-third 133 (35.8%) of the respondents agreed that COVID-19 is a fatal disease (Table 3).

Table 3.

Attitude towards COVID-19 among Health Care Professionals Working in Hospitals of South Gondar Zone, North Western Ethiopia in July 2020 (n=372)

Attitude Related Item	Agree		Neutral		Disagree
	Frequency	%	Frequency	%	Frequency	%
Black race is not protected against COVID-19.	113	30.4	185	49.7	74	19.9
Do you think that wearing face masks prevents COVID-19?	304	81.7	52	14.0	16	4.3
Do you think that handwashing prevents COVID-19?	360	96.8	12	3.2	0	0
When patients have signs and symptoms of COVID-19 I am confidently participating.	203	54.6	120	32.2	49	13.2
Ethiopia is in a good position to control the transmission of COVID-19 within a short time.	85	22.8	236	63.4	51	13.8
COVID-19 is not stigma and I should not hide my infection	230	61.8	127	34.1	15	4.1
Self-efficacy is mandatory for the prevention of COVID-19.	348	93.5	24	6.5	0	0
Collective efficacy is mandatory for the prevention of COVID-19.	356	95.7	12	3.2	4	1.1
Special training is necessary to combat COVID-19	191	51.3	181	48.7	0	0
Do you think that antibiotics have their role in the treatment of COVID-19	140	37.6	204	54.9	28	7.5
If I get infected with COVID-19, I will go to the hospital.	228	61.3	38	10.2	106	28.5
I can be infected with COVID-19 despite my good immunity.	360	96.8	12	3.2	0	0
Do you think that COVID-19 is fatal?	133	35.8	179	48.1	60	16.1
Do you think that eating well-cooked meat prevents COVID-19?	143	38.4	107	28.8	122	32.8

Prevention Practices of HCPs Towards COVID-19

The finding revealed that less than two-thirds 224 (60.2%; 95% CI: 55.5–65.3%) of respondents had good prevention practices while 148 (39.8%; 95% CI: 34.7–44.5%) of the respondents had poor prevention practices towards COVID-19. The overall prevention practice score of the respondents towards COVID-19 was 8.81±1.64. More than three-fourth, 312 (83.9%) of the respondents washed their hands with water and soap for about 20 seconds before touching patients. But, a lower number of the respondents 160 (43%) used PPE during performing their routine activities. Furthermore, more than one-third, 148 (39%) of respondents applied the recommended physical distancing of 2 meters away from others when they went to a public crowded area. Finally, nearly two-thirds, 240 (64.5%) of the participants used face masks frequently when they leave their homes (Table 4).

Table 4.

Prevention Practices towards COVID-19 among Health Care Professionals Working in Hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia in July 2020 (n=372)

Prevention Practice Related Items		Yes		No
		Frequency	%	Frequency	%
Do you wash your hands before touching the patient?		312	83.9	60	14.1
Do you wash your hands after exposure to body fluids?		360	96.8	12	3.2
Do you wash your hands after touching a patient?		352	94.6	20	5.4
Do you wash your hands after touching patients surrounding?		276	74.2	96	25.8
Do you use PPE always in the health facility?		160	43	212	57
Do you use single pairs of gloves for each patient?		128	34.4	244	65.6
Do you take precautions before entering the rooms?		256	68.8	116	31.2
In recent days have you gone to any crowded place?		276	74.2	96	25.8
In recent days, have you refrained from shaking your hands?		364	97.8	8	3.2
Do you have to avoid touching your eye nose and mouth with unwashed hands?		264	71	108	29
Do you keep yourself 2m from another person when you go to a public area?		148	39.8	224	60.2
Do you use masks when you leave your home?		240	64.5	132	35.5
Practice	Score
Good practice	224 (60.2%)
Poor practice	148 (39.8%)
Range	5–12
Mean ±SD	8.81±1.64

Factors Associated with Prevention Practices Towards COVID-19

The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age, sex, use of COVID-19 prevention guideline, working experience, and use of peers as sources of information towards COVID-19 were factors significantly associated with the prevention practices of COVID-19 at 95% (CI). Being males had 2.68 (1.50–4.81) more likely to have good prevention practices towards COVID-19 than females. Similarly, working experience of 2–5 years 4.61 (1.70–12.47) and above five years 5.86 (2.01–17.05) were more likely to have good prevention practices towards COVID-19 than who were less than 2 years of working experience. Similarly, the age of the respondents with 31–40 years was 2.49 (1.41–4.41) and above 40 years old 6.94 (2.33–20.71) times more likely to have a good COVID-19 prevention practice than those who were at the age of 20–30 years old. HCPs who used COVID-19 prevention guidelines were 4.79 (2.17–10.43) times more likely to have COVID-19 prevention practice than those who did not use the guidelines. Finally, participants who used peers as sources of information towards COVID-19 were 2.06 (1.07–3.94) times more likely to have good COVID19 prevention practices than those who did not use it (Table 5).

Table 5.

Factors Associated with COVID-19 Prevention Practices Among HCPs Working in Hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia, July 2020 (n = 372)

Variables		Good Practice	Poor Practice	COR(CI)	AOR(CI)	P value
Sex	Male	172	88	2.26 (1.44–3.54)	2.68 (1.50–4.81)	0.001
	Female	52	60	1	1
Age in years	20–30	76	80	1	1
	31–40	112	60	1.97 (1.26–3.06)	2.49 (1.41–4.41)	0.002
	≥41	36	8	4.74 (2.07–10.84)	6.94 (2.33–20.71)	0.001
Marital status	Single	58	49	1	1
	Married	142	90	1.33 (0.84–2.12)	1.8 (0.9–3.2)	0.241
	Divorced	24	9	2.25 (0.96–5.30)	2.6 (1.5–5.2)	0.320
Religion	Orthodox	193	109	2.53 (1.23–5.21)	1.81 (0.74–4.24)	0.193
	Protestant	17	19	1.28 (0.50–3.29)	0.54 (0.17–1.72)	0.293
	Muslim	14	20	1	1
Experience	<2 years	12	28	1	1
	2–5 years	63	43	3.42 (1.57–7.45)	4.61(1.70–12.47)	0.003
	>5 years	149	77	4.52 (2.18–9.37)	5.86 (2.01–17.05)	0.001
Monthly income	<3500	16	20	1	1
	3501–5000	60	44	1.71(0.79–3.66)	1.64 (0.57–4.68)	0.357
	≥5001	148	84	2.20 (1.08–4.48)	2.64 (0.85–8.20)	0.093
Presence of IP guideline	No	160	116	1	1
	Yes	64	32	1.45 (0.89–2.36)	4.79 (2.17–10.53)	<0.0001
Presence of chronic illness	No	188	112	1	1
	Yes	36	36	0.6 (0.36–1.00)	0.49 (0.25–0.96)	0.38
Use social media	No	19	18	1	1
	Yes	205	130	1.49 (0.76–2.95)	1.80 (0.73–4.46)	0.204
Peers as source of information	No	96	76	1	1
	Yes	128	72	1.41 (0.93–2.55)	2.06 (1.07–3.94)	0.03
Attitude	Positive	191	94	3.33 (2.02–5.47)	3.56 (1.89–8.71)	<0.0001
	Negative	33	54	1	1

Discussion

COVID-19 infection is has become one of the most serious global health concerns.³⁵ Therefore, assessment of COVID-19 prevention practices among HCPs plays an important role in controlling the transmission of the disease. Institution-based cross-sectional study design was applied to assess prevention practices towards COVID-19 and determinant factors among HCPs working in hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwestern Ethiopia.

More than three-quarters (82.8%; 95% CI; 79.0–86.8%) of the HCPs had good knowledge about COVID-19 which was in line with the findings in Pakistan (84%)³⁶ and Nigeria (83.7%).³⁷ The finding was higher than the finding in United Arab Emirates (UAE)³⁸ and Sierra Leon (72.7%)³⁹ but lower than the findings in Ethiopia (94.2%),⁴⁰ (92.4),²⁵ Pakistan (90.7%).⁴¹ (93.2%).⁵ The possible justification for this variation may be due to a change in the study period, setting, and method of data collection. The overall knowledge score of the participants was 76% which was in line with the finding in Ethiopia (78.8%)⁴² but lower than the findings in China (89%),⁴³ Pakistan (90.7%),⁵ and Uganda (82.4%).¹⁸ This variation may be explained due to a change in information dissemination towards COVID-19 and provision of training on COVID-19. Therefore, education and training through continuous professional education and journal clubs, particularly on symptoms and transmission are essential in improving the knowledge of HCPs about COVID-19 is essential.¹⁸ About 90% of the HCPs used social media as a source of information about COVID-19 which was consistent with a finding in China (91.1%).²⁶ On the contrary, it was higher than the finding in UAE (60%).³⁸ The possible reason may be due to the variation in the accessibility of the internet and culture of the participants.

Most of the respondents (88.2%) knew that the elderly and those who have a chronic illness were more likely to develop severe cases of COVID-19 which was higher than the finding in Ethiopia (72.5%).⁴⁴ This difference may be due to the change of educational background of the study subjects and study period. On the other hand, less than two-thirds 60.2% of HCP knew that children and young adults need to take COVID-19 prevention measures. Neglecting these high-risk groups of the populations may create good opportunities for the transmission of the disease.

Three-quarter (76.6%; 95% CI; 71.8–80.6%) of the participants had a positive attitude towards COVID-19 which was in line with the findings in Ethiopia (72%)⁴⁵ and Nigeria (79.5%),⁴⁶ (78.9%).³⁷ However, it was higher than the findings in Bangladesh (48%),⁴⁷ Uganda (21%)¹⁸ and Ethiopia (54.0%),⁴⁸ (64%).²⁵ On the contrary, it was lower than the findings in Ethiopia (94.7%)²² and Pakistan (82.16%),⁴⁹ (90%).⁵ The possible justification for this variation may be due to a change in the study period, heterogeneity of study participants, and study setting.

Less than a quarter 22.8% of the respondents agreed that Ethiopia will control COVID-19 within a short time which was lower than a finding in China (97.1%).²⁶ This variation may be due to the change in the health care system, commitment of the governments towards prevention of the disease, and budget deficiency. Furthermore, less than two-thirds 61.8% of the respondents agreed that COVID-19 does not lead to the stigma which was lower than the findings in Ethiopia (77%),²² and 83.8%.³⁸ The presence of stigma towards COVID-19 may lead to under-reporting of cases. As a result, the rate of mortality and morbidity due to COVID-19 will be increased proportionally.

The adaption of prevention practices is the only solution to control the COVID-19, as to date, there is no specific treatment for the novel coronavirus.⁵ But, insufficient PPEs for HCWs and isolation facilities, environmental contamination and overcrowding have worsened COVID-19 response and management strategies in various localities mainly in developing countries.³⁷ The current finding revealed that less than two-thirds (60.2%; 95% CI; 55.5–65.3%) of the participants had good prevention practices towards COVID-19 which was consistent with the study in Ethiopia^22,28, (55%).²⁵ The finding was higher than the study in Ethiopia (41.6%),⁵⁰ (10.4%),⁵¹ 49%,⁵² (40.70%),⁵³ (49%).²⁷ On the contrary, it was lower than the findings in UAE (86.5%),⁵⁴ Pakistan (73.4%),⁵⁵ Uganda (74%),¹⁸ Nigeria (77.6%).³⁷ The possible reason for the variation may be due to the change in respondents’ personal and environmental characteristics, accessibility of facilities, monitoring and follow up, training coverage, strength of health care systems, sample size, and study period. The overall mean score of prevention practice score was 8.81±1.64 (73.4%) which was higher than the finding in Ethiopia.²⁸

Nearly, three-quarters 74% of the respondents practiced handwashing with water and soap for about 20 seconds which was higher than the finding in Ethiopia (61.3%)²⁵ but lower than the finding in Ethiopia (82.6%),⁵⁶ Uganda (96%),¹⁸ Malaysia (87.8%),⁵⁷ and Rwanda (95%).⁵⁸ The possible justification for this variation may be due to a change in availability and accessibility of handwashing facilities in the health care setting, and handwashing behaviors. Access of essential facilities mainly in healthcare setting plays a vital role in tackling the transmission of HAIs infection including COVID-19. In the present finding only one-third 34.4% of the participants used a single pair of gloves for each patient. This finding was supported with the fact that more than three quarters of the participants replied as there was shortage of PPE including gloves. Less than two-thirds 64.5% of the HCPs always wore a mask when coming in contact with the patients which was in line with the finding in Ethiopia²² but lower than the finding in Ethiopia (54.7%).²⁵ The present study finding was lower than the finding in Pakistan,⁵ and China (98.0%)⁴³ but higher than in Uganda (54%).¹⁸ The possible reason for this variation may be due to a change in availability and accessibility of facilities, affordability of face masks, perception towards face masks, and commitment of the HCPs on tackling the transmission of the disease.

According to the current finding, male HCPs had 2.68 (1.50–4.81) times more likely to have good prevention practices on COVID-19 which was supported with the finding in Ethiopia²⁰ and China.⁵⁹ Working experience of HCPs was another factor of COVID-19 prevention practice. HCPs who had more experience had implemented better COVID-19 prevention measures. This may be due to the fact that in history there were a number of epidemics such as influenza with similar features with the current pandemic. Different organizations including WHO has designed different COVID-19 prevention guidelines mainly in healthcare setting to enhance the prevention measures of COVID-19 among HCPs. But, most of them may not use these guidelines due to different reasons. Hence, the current finding of the study revealed that HCPs who used these guidelines were 1.45 more likely to have a good COVID-19 prevention practice than the corresponding group. This finding was consistent with the finding in Ethiopia.²⁸ The age of the HCPs was another factor which affects the prevention practices of COVID-19. Based on the current finding, the higher age 31–40 and above 40 years old were 2.49 and 6.94 time more likely to have good prevention practice respectively than the corresponding age groups of less than 30 years old. The present study findings were consistent with the findings in Ethiopia,⁶⁰ and Uganda.¹⁸ Increasing age may lead the development of immune-compromised. Therefore, such types of situations may activate individuals to practice better COVID-19 prevention measures which was supported by other findings.⁶¹

HCPs are at the frontline of COVID-19 pandemic response and are exposed to dangers like pathogen exposure, long working hours, psychological distress, fatigue, occupational burnout and stigma, and physical violence. A poor understanding of the disease among HCPs can result in delayed identification and treatment leading to rapid spread of infections.¹⁸ Knowledge greatly reflects the practice of individuals as it provides a base for good practice. Although the level of knowledge and attitude was good, less than two-thirds of the HCPs had implemented good COVID-19 prevention practices. The overall prevention of the COVID-19 highly depends mainly on the implementation of COVID-19 prevention measures by HCPs. But, in this finding the prevention practice was below expected. Hence, the time required for the control of the disease from the world may need more than years than the expected time. Therefore, more effort is required from HCPs to be accepted by the general population.Therefore, implementation of proper Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) measures mainly in healthcare setting will have been implemented to reduce nosocomial microorganism transmission mainly in healthcare setting even after the elimination of the pandemic.

Conclusion

Generally, less than two-thirds of the participants had good prevention practices about COVID-19. Being male, higher age groups, more working experience, use of COVID-19 prevention guidelines, use of peers as sources of information towards COVID-19, and a positive attitude towards COVID-19 were factors affecting COVID-19 prevention practices.Therefore, continuous information dissemination using different strategies should be conducted on the overall prevention practices of COVID-19. Furthermore, higher officials of the healthcare facilities should establish a continuous meeting in their healthcare setting to create a good opportunity for sharing of good prevention practices among the HCPS. The healthcare facilities should establish functional infection prevention committee to monitor and follow up the prevention practices of COVID-19 and taking appropriate measures in collaboration of the officials of the healthcare facilities and the zonal and regional health office; finally, we want to recommend longitudinal and qualitative studies should be conducted.

Limitation of the Study

This study has limitations. First, since this is a cross-sectional analysis, the temporal significance of our results can shift over time or as large-scale preventive initiatives are implemented. Second, the study was a self-reported survey, respondents could have chosen socially desirable options rather than their real knowledge attitude and prevention practices.

Abbreviations

AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; COR, crude odds ratio; COVID-19, coronavirus disease-2019; ETB, Ethiopian birr; HAIs, hospital acquired infection; HCPs, health care professionals; PPE, personal protective equipment; SARS-COV-2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome- Corona Virus-2; WHO, World Health Organization.

Data Sharing Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest for this work.