Skip to main content
Brain Sciences logoLink to Brain Sciences
. 2021 Jul 21;11(8):959. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11080959

Heart Rate Variability Analyses in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Konstantin G Heimrich 1,*, Thomas Lehmann 2, Peter Schlattmann 2, Tino Prell 1,3
Editors: Gesine Respondek, Lars Tönges
PMCID: PMC8394422  PMID: 34439578

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the vagus nerve and autonomic dysfunction play an important role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Using heart rate variability analysis, the autonomic modulation of cardiac activity can be investigated. This meta-analysis aims to assess if analysis of heart rate variability may indicate decreased parasympathetic tone in patients with Parkinson’s disease. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central databases were searched on 31 December 2020. Studies were included if they: (1) were published in English, (2) analyzed idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and healthy adult controls, and (3) reported at least one frequency- or time-domain heart rate variability analysis parameter, which represents parasympathetic regulation. We included 47 studies with 2772 subjects. Random-effects meta-analyses revealed significantly decreased effect sizes in Parkinson patients for the high-frequency spectral component (HFms2) and the short-term measurement of the root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval differences (RMSSD). However, heterogeneity was high, and there was evidence for publication bias regarding HFms2. There is some evidence that a more advanced disease leads to an impaired parasympathetic regulation. In conclusion, short-term measurement of RMSSD is a reliable parameter to assess parasympathetically impaired cardiac modulation in Parkinson patients. The measurement should be performed with a predefined respiratory rate.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease, heart rate variability, vagus nerve, autonomic nervous system, autonomic dysfunction

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders. As a multisystem disorder, PD is characterized by motor symptoms and a plethora of nonmotor symptoms [1,2,3]. An increasing number of studies indicate that these are at least partly caused by changes in the gut-brain axis [4], dysbiosis with local inflammation [5], and finally alpha-synuclein accumulation in the enteric nervous system [6]. These pathological proteins may spread via the vagus nerve to the central nervous system [7]. The vagus nerve is the main parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system. Additionally, central dopaminergic cell death can favor central inflammatory processes that affect the vagus nerve directly [8]. An altered function of the autonomic nervous system can cause various nonmotor symptoms, accordingly, many PD patients have symptoms of dysautonomia [9]. Frequently, patients complain of hypersalivation, swallowing difficulties, delayed gastric emptying, constipation, or orthostatic hypotension [10].

Assessing parasympathetic regulation in PD is a promising way to assess symptoms and to improve our knowledge of the course of the disease. Similarly, improved dysautonomia testing may be of additional value in differentiating PD and atypical parkinsonian syndromes. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a simple method to estimate the overall tone of the autonomic nervous system [11]. Whereas heart rate quantifies the number of heartbeats per minute, HRV refers to the fluctuation in the time between successive heartbeats. It reflects the sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation of cardiac activity. In cardiology, there are recommendations for HRV analysis for standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use [12]. Recommendations for clinical use in patients with neurodegenerative diseases do not exist. In the literature, there are many different approaches to studying HRV in PD.

In general, a distinction can be made in (1) frequency-domain indices, (2) time-domain indices, and (3) nonlinear measurements [11]. Frequency-domain indices are used to describe the power spectral density as a function of frequency using mathematical algorithms. Short-term recordings can distinguish high-frequency (HF), low-frequency and very-low-frequency components. Long-term recordings can additionally distinguish ultra-low-frequency components. The HF component is generated mainly by parasympathetic modulation [11]. Time-domain indices quantify HRV observed during monitoring periods ranging from shorter than 1 minute to longer than 24 h. To describe parasympathetic regulation, there are two established parameters. The root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval differences (RMSSD) in ms reflects the beat-to-beat variance, and the percentage of adjacent normal heartbeat intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 ms (pNN50).

In addition to these mentioned statistical measurements, time-domain recordings can also be converted into nonlinear geometric patterns. However, these geometric patterns mainly describe the total variance and not parasympathetic activity [11], and will therefore not be considered in this review. In this systematic review of parasympathetic modulation in PD, we will focus on the HF spectral component, RMSSD, and pNN50. Lower values of HF, RMSSD, and pNN50 are an indication of reduced parasympathetic regulation.

The objective of our study is to systematically review the literature if a frequency- or time-domain analysis of the HRV may indicate a decreased parasympathetic tone in patients with PD. Our secondary aim is to determine the most suitable HRV method for clinical use in PD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy and Eligibility Criteria

We conducted our systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [13]. This study does not constitute human subject research. Therefore, there was no need for local ethics committee approval. The search strategy was created in consultation with a medical statistician with expertise in systematic review searching. Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central) were screened from inception to 31 December 2020, without any restriction on the year of the study. We searched MEDLINE with the Medical Subject Headings “Parkinson disease” (Mesh) AND “heart rate” (Mesh) and EMBASE with the subject headings “Parkinson disease” AND “heart rate variability” and limited the records to humans, English, and articles. Our search in Cochrane Central was conducted using the keywords “Parkinson” AND “heart rate variability” and allowing word variations. The reference lists of included studies or relevant reviews identified through the search were searched to identify any studies missed in the initial search to ensure literature saturation. Only full-text articles were considered for analysis. References were managed using EndNote (version X8; Clarivate Analytics). Titles and abstracts were screened by one reviewer (K.G.H.) and controlled by a second reviewer (T.P.) if the study was excluded.

Studies needed to be original research. We included studies with an observational design, randomized controlled trials, controlled (nonrandomized) clinical trials, and interrupted time series studies if there was at least one reported data point before the intervention. Review articles, book reviews, short communications, and correspondences were excluded.

Two reviewers assessed the full-text articles for eligibility (K.G.H. and T.P.). Different assessments were resolved by consensus. Articles were included if they: (1) were published in English, (2) reported patients with idiopathic PD as a primary study group and healthy adult controls as a secondary study group, and (3) reported at least one HRV parameter, which represents parasympathetic activity (HF spectral component, RMSSD, or pNN50).

2.2. Data Extraction

The data extraction form was developed in Microsoft Excel (version 2016; Microsoft Corporation). The data extraction was performed by one member of the research team (K.G.H.) and checked by a second (T.P.). The following data were extracted: study information (author, title, journal, and year of publication), study characteristics (e.g., study setting), participant characteristics (e.g., age, sex, disease severity, and disease duration), condition information (i.e., data sources, total number of participants, and exclusion criteria), and HRV parameters (HF, RMSSD, and pNN50). Data on participant characteristics and HRV parameters were extracted and, if possible, grouped to achieve better evaluability. The results of substudies were extracted separately in order to allow subsequent subgroup analysis based on different subgroup characteristics. If there were incomplete data reported in the publication, we searched supplementary information and documents to locate missing data.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

For each study population, the main characteristics were reported as mean ± SD (standard deviation) for continuous variables and the number (%) for categorical variables. If not reported, the sample mean and SD were synthetized and estimated from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range [14]. Random-effects meta-analyses by means of the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method were conducted. If substudies were reported, the raw mean of each study was calculated to avoid an overestimation of the impact. Data were analyzed separately for each HRV parameter. Hedges’ g was used as a measure of standardized mean differences (SMD).

We estimated the significance and degree of heterogeneity in the study results by Cochrane’s Q, I2-statistics, and Tau2-statistics. To evaluate the heterogeneity, we searched for outliers. Additionally, we performed influence analyses by means of the leave-one-out method and GOSH plot analyses.

We conducted random-effects subgroup analyses to assess measurement time-dependent between-subgroup differences. Additionally, subgroup analyses were carried out between normal and deep breathing to assess the impact of respiration on HRV. Deep breathing with a predefined respiratory rate standardized the respiration-driven acceleration and deceleration of the heart rate [15].

We considered studies that performed both normal and deep breathing in the same population to assess comparability.

Random-effects meta-regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between HRV parameters and relevant covariates. We checked for multicollinearity. We considered predictors to be highly correlated if r > 0.8.

Publication bias was assessed through Egger’s Test. A p-value of Egger’s test < 0.05 is significant, which means that there is substantial asymmetry in the funnel plot. When Egger’s test was significant, the trim-and-fill procedure was used to adjust for publication bias.

We did not perform a detailed quality assessment of each included study. First, because mainly no intervention effect was analyzed and second, because the statement of the initiative to strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE statement) should not be used as a tool to assess the methodological quality of cohort studies [16].

For statistical analyses, R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, version 3.6.3) and RStudio (PBC, version 1.3.1093) were used with meta (General Package for Meta-Analysis, version 4.15-1), metafor (Meta-Analysis Package for R, version 2.4-0), Hmisc (Harrell Miscellaneous, version 4.4-1) and dmetar (Companion R package for the guide ‘Doing Meta-Analysis in R’, version 0.0.90000) [17].

3. Results

3.1. Selection and Study Population

We screened 485 unique citations. Of these, 135 were assessed for eligibility, and 47 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64]. For further details on study selection, see Figure 1. The study population includes 2772 subjects. Of these, 1566 had PD, and 1206 were healthy controls. The summarized findings of the population are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram. HRV: heart rate variability.

Table 1.

Study population, characteristics.

Characteristics PD Patients (n = 1566) Controls (n = 1206)
Gender (male, %) 60.8 55.3
Age (years) 65.0 ± 0.6 62.6 ± 1.0
Disease duration (years) 5.8 ± 0.5 -
Hoehn and Yahr stage 2.2 ± 0.1 -
UPDRS 32.3 ± 3.6 -
UPDRSIII 21.4 ± 2.2 -

Values are given as the mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated; PD: Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, total score; UPDRSIII: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, subscore III motor part. Data of the Movement Disorder Society revised version of the UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) or MDS-UPDRSIII are not included.

3.2. Study Characteristics

All included studies used HRV analysis to assess autonomic function in PD patients compared to controls. Most studies focused on the measurement of HRV under particular conditions regarding time, duration, and method, or they intended to describe a relation between HRV and the severity of PD. An overview of the included studies can be found in Table A1 in the Appendix A.

Patients with a confirmed PD diagnosis according to the United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria or the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) clinical diagnostic criteria were included. Exclusion criteria varied. In particular, these are cardiovascular diseases, endocrinological diseases (especially diabetes), peripheral or central neurological disorders (except PD), liver, kidney or lung diseases, and medication known to affect the autonomic nervous system. Eight studies stated that any medical disorder known to affect the autonomic nervous system was excluded [19,21,22,30,36,48,53,58]. Cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and selected drugs were excluded in 13 studies [19,22,28,31,32,33,34,35,43,45,55,58,63]. No exclusion criteria were reported in five studies [24,42,44,52,59].

The duration of the measurements varied from 1 minute to 24 h. Because there is no uniformly accepted limit, we categorized the study into short-term (shorter than one hour) and long-term (longer than one hour) measurements. Short-term measurements were carried out in 34 studies, with a range from 1–20 min. Long-term measurements were carried out in 16 studies, with a range from 6–24 h. Short-term measurements were mainly conducted during daytime and long-term measurements during day- and nighttime.

3.3. Random-Effects Meta-Analyses

We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis for each HRV parameter. The results are shown in Table 2(A), raw analyses.

Table 2.

Study population, random-effects meta-analyses raw (A) and heterogeneity analyses (B).

(A) Raw Analyses PD Patients Controls SMD ci.lb ci.ub p value I2 (%) Tau2 k
HF (ms2) 145.2 ± 41.1 219.4 ± 48.8 −1.38 −2.17 −0.58 0.002 91 3.27 23
HF (nu) 34.7 ± 1.8 33.2 ± 1.9 0.08 −0.93 1.09 0.867 96 3.99 18
RMSSD (ms) 23.4 ± 1.9 28.9 ± 1.8 −0.58 −1.18 0.02 0.059 92 1.35 18
pNN50 (%) 4.7 ± 1.1 6.8 ± 1.3 −0.46 −1.54 0.63 0.378 96 3.39 14
(B) Heterogeneity Analyses PD Patients Controls SMD ci.lb ci.ub p value I2 (%) Tau2 k
HF (ms2) 107.7 ± 11.0 183.0 ± 22.0 −0.79 −1.13 −0.45 <0.001 67 0.28 14
HF (nu) 34.5 ± 3.3 33.8 ± 3.2 0.04 −0.29 0.36 0.810 53 0.12 9
RMSSD (ms) 21.7 ± 1.2 24.7 ± 1.1 −0.65 −0.97 −0.32 0.001 66 0.18 12
pNN50 (%) 3.5 ± 0.5 5.5 ± 0.8 −0.59 −1.06 −0.12 0.020 64 0.28 9

Values are given as mean or as mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated: (A) raw analyses; (B) heterogeneity analyses; ci.lb: confidence interval lower bound; ci.ub: confidence interval upper bound; HF: high frequency components of the power spectral density; HRV: heart rate variability; k: number of considered studies; nu: normalized units; PD: Parkinson’s disease; pNN50: number of normal-to-normal intervals differing by more than 50 ms divided by the total number of normal-to-normal intervals; RMSSD: Root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval differences; SMD: standardized mean differences.

3.3.1. Frequency-Domain Parameters of HRV

Mainly, the HF components of the power spectral density are either measured in absolute values (ms2) or in normalized units (nu). These data will be analyzed below. Studies, which reported data only in the rarely used units ln [31,42,62], log [60], ms/Hz [57], and *10−1s2/Hz [32] were not considered in the following analyses of HF.

HFms2. HFms2 was reported in 24 studies [18,20,21,22,23,24,26,27,28,29,30,35,36,39,40,45,47,48,54,55,56,59,63,64]. The mean HFms2 was 145.2 ± 41.1 ms2 in PD patients and 219.4 ± 48.8 ms2 in the healthy control group. Two studies had to be excluded [33,58] because the powers of ten differed by a factor of three to four. Accordingly, the values of these two studies were not considered plausible. PD patients had significantly lower HFms2 values than healthy controls. The forest plot of the effect sizes for HFms2 is shown in Figure 2. Egger’s test revealed evidence of publication bias (p < 0.001). Trim-and-fill procedure indicated seven missing studies. The adjusted estimate of the effect size changed substantially, leading to a nonsignificant effect (SMD = −0.46; 95% CI = −1.45 to 0.52; p = 0.344; I2 = 94%).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Forest plot HFms2, random-effects meta-analysis. HFms2: high-frequency components of the power spectral density in ms2; N: number; SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval. Rhombus indicates meta-analytically pooled estimate of the 95% confidence interval. The numbers after the authors indicate the included substudies according to the information provided in Appendix A, Table A1.

HFnu. HFnu was reported in 18 studies [21,23,24,26,27,34,35,36,37,43,44,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. The mean HFnu was 34.7 ± 1.8 in PD patients and 33.2 ± 1.9 in the healthy control group. One study had to be excluded because the powers of ten differed by a factor of two [58]. The values of this study were therefore considered to be not plausible. Contrary to the calculation of HFms2, no significant difference was determined regarding HFnu. The forest plot can be seen in Figure 3. Egger’s test revealed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.772).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Forest plot HFnu, random-effects meta-analysis. HFnu: High-frequency components of the power spectral density in normalized units.

In nine studies, both HFms2 and HFnu were assessed [21,23,24,26,27,35,36,54,55] with no significant linear correlation (rp = 0.21, p = 0.583).

3.3.2. Time-Domain Parameters of HRV

RMSSD. The RMSSD in ms was reported in 18 studies [19,23,25,26,27,29,34,40,41,42,44,46,51,53,54,55,57,63]. Two studies assessed RMSSD but had to be excluded. Of them, one study reported the results logarithmically [60]. The other study was excluded because the powers of ten differed by a factor of three, and the values were therefore considered to be not plausible [61]. In PD patients, the mean RMSSD was 23.4 ± 1.9 ms, compared to 28.9 ± 1.8 ms in the healthy control group. However, these differences are statistically not significant (p = 0.059). This finding is shown in the forest plot in Figure 4. Egger’s test revealed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.096).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Forest plot RMSSD, random-effects meta-analysis. RMSSD: Root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval differences.

pNN50. The pNN50 was reported in 14 studies [19,23,27,28,34,40,41,44,46,52,53,54,55,57]. The mean pNN50 was 4.7 ± 1.1% in PD patients and 6.8 ± 1.3% in the healthy control group. These differences are statistically not significant (p = 0.378). According to Egger’s test, there was evidence of publication bias (p = 0.043). Adding the four missing studies that the trim-and-fill procedure identified, the adjusted estimate of the effect size did not change substantially. There was still no significant effect size (SMD = 0.36; 95% CI = −0.82 to 1.53; p = 0.532; I2 = 97%). The forest plot can be seen in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Forest plot pNN50, random-effects meta-analysis. pNN50: Percentage of adjacent normal heartbeat intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 ms.

3.4. Between-Study Heterogeneity

High values for I2 were found for all HRV parameters. We evaluated heterogeneity by performing outlier analysis, influence analysis, and GOSH plot analysis for each HRV parameter. Then, we excluded studies that were identified with a potentially high risk of bias. Again, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. The results are shown in Table 2(B), heterogeneity analyses. Taken together, in PD patients, there were still significantly lower values for HFms2. Additionally, there were significant effect sizes regarding RMSSD and pNN50. I2 decreased considerably. However, there was still a moderate degree of heterogeneity, indicating different patient populations, interventions, or measurement methods.

3.5. Subgroup Analyses

PD patients had significantly lower HFms2 values both during short-term and long-term measurements than healthy controls (short-term, SMD = −1.63; 95% CI = −2.82 to −0.44, p = 0.011, I2 = 84%; long-term, SMD = −0.85; 95% CI = −1.68 to −0.01, p = 0.047, I2 = 73%). There were no significant between-group differences (Q = 1.41, p = 0.235). Regarding HFnu, neither short-term nor long-term measurements revealed a significant effect size between PD patients and controls (short-term, SMD = −0.29, 95% CI = −1.51 to 0.93, p = 0.615, I2 = 95%; long-term, SMD = 1.04, 95% CI = −1.36 to 3.43, p = 0.296, I2 = 97%). RMSSD is significantly reduced in the short-term setting but not in the long-term setting (short-term, SMD = −0.99, 95% CI= −1.84 to −0.15, p = 0.026, I2 = 87%; long-term, SMD = −0.05, 95% CI = −0.97 to 0.86, p = 0.895, I2 = 92%), which is shown in the forest plot in Figure 6. There were no significant effect sizes regarding pNN50 during short-term and long-term measurements (short-term, SMD = −1.52, 95% CI = −3.35 to 0.31, p = 0.086, I2 = 93%; long-term, SMD = 0.32, 95% CI = −1.05 to 1.70, p = 0.596, I2 = 97%).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Forest plot RMSSD, subgroup measurement time.

We also performed a subgroup analysis to assess differences between normal and deep breathing. Deep breathing was applied in five studies [24,27,43,44,61]. Of them, two studies analyzed HFms2 [24,27]. There were no significant differences in either the normal breathing or the deep breathing subgroup between PD patients and controls (normal breathing, SMD = −2.26; 95% CI = −6.52 to 2.01, p = 0.151, I2 = 95%; deep breathing, SMD = −1.77, 95% CI = −21.70 to 18.15, p = 0.461, I2 = 97%). Regarding HFnu we considered three studies [24,27,43]. There were no significant differences in these two subgroups between PD patients and controls (normal breathing, SMD = −0.60; 95% CI = −1.82 to 0.61, p = 0.212, I2 = 83%; deep breathing, SMD = 0.26, 95% CI = −1.11 to 1.64, p = 0.496, I2 = 71%). Only one study assessed the time-domain HRV parameters RMSSD and pNN50 during normal and deep breathing [27]. According to the study results both normal breathing and deep breathing revealed significantly lower values in PD patients than in controls (RMSSD: normal breathing, SMD = −3.76, 95% CI = −6.85 to −0.66, p = 0.041; deep breathing, SMD = −4.28, 95% CI = −5.45 to −3.11, p < 0.001; pNN50: normal breathing, SMD = −2.73, 95% CI = −4.67 to −0.78, p = 0.036; deep breathing, SMD = −4.85, 95% CI = −6.13 to −3.57, p < 0.001).

3.6. Meta-Regression

First, we considered patient age, sex, disease duration and severity of disease determined by Hoehn and Yahr stage, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score and UPDRSIII subscore separately. A longer disease duration significantly contributed to lower HFms2 (p = 0.033), but only in the long-term measurement. A higher Hoehn and Yahr stage was associated with lower RMSSD (p = 0.0274), but only in the short-term measurement.

Second, we conducted multiple meta-regression analyses. The UPDRS score and UPDRSIII subscore are with a substantial degree of accuracy significantly linearly predicted from the Hoehn and Yahr stage (rp = 0.92 and rp = 0.81, respectively). Accordingly, as covariates, we included patient age, sex, disease duration and Hoehn and Yahr stage. Multiple meta-regressions revealed no significant contribution of any covariate to one of the HRV parameters.

4. Discussion

PD patients exhibited a strong decrease in parasympathetically modulated HRV parameters compared to healthy controls. In our meta-analysis, PD was associated with lower values of HFms2 and lower values of RMSSD during short-term measurements. No decrease was seen regarding HFnu. The normalized unit of HF is the relative value of HF in proportion to the total power minus the very-low-frequency component. Total power includes all frequencies and depends on the regulation of both branches of the autonomic nervous system. Therefore, normalization tends to minimize the parasympathetic influence. Accordingly, it must be emphasized at this point that a determination of HFnu does not allow any valid statement on parasympathetic modulation, because it reflects the overall autonomic tone.

As shown in the meta-regression analyses, there is some evidence that more advanced PD leads to an increasing reduction in these parasympathetically modulated HRV parameters. This outcome corresponds to the assumption of increasing damage to the vagus nerve in the course of the disease [61,65]. Especially regarding HFms2, disease duration significantly contributes to the effect size. Additionally, the Hoehn and Yahr stage significantly contributed to the effect size of RMSSD. However, these correlations could not be consistently ascertained for all HRV parameters. Clinical parameters regarding the duration and severity of the disease have not been reported in many studies. The UPDRSIII subscore was only reported in 16 of 47 studies. Only two studies used the MDS-UPDRSIII subscore [29,61], although it was published in 2007 and should be used preferably [66]. Insufficient data reporting precluded studies from the meta-regression model.

It is known that age and sex have an important impact on HRV [67,68,69,70,71]. Aging causes neuronal and structural modifications of the cardiorespiratory system leading to a decreased vagal tone [68,70]. The influence of patient age could not be confirmed by our results. Generally, it is assumed that females show greater vagal tone than males [71]. This differential autonomic tone indicates age- and sex-related predisposition to cardiovascular diseases. We could not find evidence that in PD, HRV parameters depended significantly on sex. This result may be due to progressive sex-independent vagal damage in the course of PD.

Heterogeneity of the studies was high. Besides a limited number of studies, this indicates different patient populations and diverse study settings. Especially regarding frequency-domain measurements, many studies had to be classified as outliers or influence studies. High heterogeneity makes valid regression analysis difficult and complicates the investigation of relevant covariates regarding disease severity. This issue could be improved through a standardized basic measurement in addition to a study-specific measurement and through reporting of defined clinical parameters. This would allow for improved subgroup analysis.

The importance of a subgroup analysis becomes clear when considering the measurement time. Considering measurement time, it is evident that RMSSD is significantly reduced in PD patients only during short-term measurements. Theoretically, a 24-h recording seems to be advantageous because the total variance of HRV increases. However, the prerequisite for this would be that the mechanisms responsible for heart rate modulation remain unchanged during the recording period to ensure a largely stable heart rate and respiratory rate. Otherwise, the results of HRV analysis may be more due to external influences than to autonomic regulation. In particular, physiological mechanisms of heart rate modulation cannot be considered stationary over a 24-h period [72]. Therefore, short-term measurements under stationary conditions, especially regarding physical activity, position, and temperature, seem to be advantageous, which is supported by our meta-analysis.

To ensure literature saturation patients with a leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 mutation (LRRK2) associated PD were not primarily excluded. Additionally, most of the patients were not explicitly genetically tested and therefore it cannot be excluded that LRRK2-associated PD patients were included in other study populations. Autonomic dysfunctions are associated with genetic forms of synucleinopathies like LRRK2-associated PD [73]. Within this meta-analysis we identified two studies, which examine HRV in LRRK2-associated PD patients [26,60]. These studies showed higher parasympathetically modulated HRV parameters in LRRK2-associated PD patients compared to idiopathic PD. Therefore, it can be assumed that the described effect sizes are rather underestimated.

It is well known that respiration has a major impact on heart rate [74]. The heart rate increases during inspiration and decreases during expiration, which is called respiratory sinus arrhythmia [15]. Measurements conducted with a predefined deep breathing rate enable HRV analyses to reflect the vagal tone rather than differences in respiration [72]. The obtained results of our subgroup analyses regarding normal and deep breathing should be interpreted with caution. The results are based on the values of a very limited number of studies. Especially regarding RMSSD and pNN50, the results are obtained from just one study [27]. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to perform HRV analysis with a predefined respiratory rate. Otherwise, the significance of the analysis is very limited. This should be considered in further studies.

In addition to heterogeneity and meta-regression analyses, the results have to be evaluated under consideration of publication bias. Rather unexpectedly, there was no significant adjusted effect size regarding HFms2. However, a subgroup analyses revealed that there is evidence of publication bias only in the short-term measurement of HFms2, and not in the long-term measurement.

5. Conclusions

HRV analysis is an easy tool to measure vagal influence on the heart rate, and indirectly, to assess autonomic dysfunction in PD. PD patients showed decreased parasympathetically modulated HRV parameters compared to healthy controls. This finding is in line with the assumption of vagal damage in the course of the disease. After considering heterogeneity analysis, subgroup analysis and evaluation of publication bias, we recommend establishing a short-term measurement of RMSSD as a basic measurement of HRV in future studies. At the very least, this parameter should be reported as a basic measurement in addition to study-specific measurements. To standardize the impact of respiration, the measurement should be performed with a predefined respiratory rate of around six respiratory cycles per minute. To enable further assessment of disease progression and in the attempt to distinguish PD and atypical parkinsonian syndromes, we recommend specifying defined clinical parameters of the patient collective. In particular, patient age, sex, disease duration and severity of disease determined by Hoehn and Yahr stage are easy to collect even for non-neurologists. A specification of the MDS-UPDRSIII would further improve the quality of future studies.

Appendix A

Table A1.

Study selection, characteristics.

Study Group HRV Analysis Measurement N Age (y) N Age (y) Disease Hoehn/Yahr
Parameter Duration (PD) (PD) (HC) (HC) Duration (y) Stage
Allan (2006) [18] PD patients with dementia HFms2 short 40 72 38 76 5.0 na
Arnao (2020), 1 [19] ambulatory setting, daytime RMSSD, pNN50 long 18 56 18 56 5.0 na
Arnao (2020), 2 [19] ambulatory setting, nighttime RMSSD, pNN50 long 18 56 18 56 5.0 na
Asahina (2014) [20] PD patients, early untreated HFms2 short 50 64 20 64 1.8 1.6
Barbic (2007), 1 [21] PD patients without orthostatic hypotension HFms2, HFnu short 19 66 20 64 7.5 2.7
Barbic (2007), 2 [21] PD patients with orthostatic hypotension HFms2, HFnu short 21 69 20 64 10.5 2.8
Bouhaddi (2004), 1 [22] involvement of L-dopa therapy, newly diagnosed without L-dopa HFms2 short 9 61 9 63 1.2 1.0
Bouhaddi (2004), 2 [22] involvement of L-dopa therapy, newly diagnosed with L-dopa HFms2 short 9 61 9 63 1.2 1.0
Bouhaddi (2004), 3 [22] involvement of L-dopa therapy, long-term treated without L-dopa HFms2 short 18 69 9 63 6.0 2.0
Bouhaddi (2004), 4 [22] involvement of L-dopa therapy, long-term treated with L-dopa HFms2 short 18 69 9 63 6.0 2.0
Brisinda (2013), 1 [23] PD patients, frequency analysis, during sleep HFms2, HFnu short 23 63 40 na na 2.0
Brisinda (2013), 2 [23] PD patients, frequency analysis, daily activity HFms2, HFnu short 23 63 40 na na 2.0
Brisinda (2013), 3 [23] PD patients, time-domain analysis RMSSD, pNN50 long 23 63 40 na na 2.0
Brown (2012), 1 [24] resting condition, compared to older healthy controls HFms2, HFnu short 25 na 28 na na na
Brown (2012), 2 [24] deep breathing, compared to older healthy controls HFms2, HFnu short 25 na 28 na na na
Buob (2010) [25] early stages of PD RMSSD long 7 50 7 50 4.0 na
Carricarte (2019), 1 [26] PD patients, LRRK2-associated HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD short 14 63 27 59 10.8 na
Carricarte (2019), 2 [26] PD patients, idiopathic HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD short 20 64 27 59 6.3 na
Delgado (2014), 1 [27] Mexican PD patients, supine resting HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 20 61 20 38 3.7 na
Delgado (2014), 2 [27] Mexican PD patients, active standing HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 20 61 20 38 3.7 na
Delgado (2014), 3 [27] Mexican PD patients, controlled breathing HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 20 61 20 38 3.7 na
Devos (2003), 1 [28] untreated PD patients, disease duration less than 2 years, daytime HFms2 long 10 60 10 61 1.5 na
Devos (2003), 2 [28] untreated PD patients, disease duration less than 2 years, nighttime HFms2, pNN50 long 10 60 10 61 1.5 na
Devos (2003), 3 [28] treated PD patients, disease duration more than 2 years, daytime HFms2 long 10 63 10 61 8.0 na
Devos (2003), 4 [28] treated PD patients, disease duration more than 2 years, nighttime HFms2, pNN50 long 10 63 10 61 8.0 na
Devos (2003), 5 [28] treated PD patients, advanced PD with motor complications, daytime HFms2 long 10 62 10 61 8.6 na
Devos (2003), 6 [28] treated PD patients, advanced PD with motor complications, nighttime HFms2, pNN50 long 10 62 10 61 8.6 na
Gjerloff (2015) [29] association with Donepezil positron emission tomography HFms2, RMSSD short 12 64 12 62 5.3 2.2
Haapaniemi (2001) [30] ambulatory setting, 24 h HFms2 long 54 61 47 60 1.7 1.5 #
Harnod (2014) [31] association with motor symptom duration HF (ln) * short 32 62 32 na 9.8 2.7
Jain (2011) [32] association with pupil measures HF (*10−1s2/Hz) * short 17 65 18 60 na 1.7
Jaipurkar (2018), 1 [33] PD patients, supine resting HFms2 * short 31 61 31 60 3.6 na
Jaipurkar (2018), 2 [33] PD patients, head-up tilt table test HFms2 * short 31 61 31 60 3.6 na
Kallio (2000), 1 [34] PD patients, untreated RMSSD short 50 60 55 56 2.2 1.7
Kallio (2000), 2 [34] PD patients, untreated, fast Fourier transform analysis HFnu, pNN50 short 20 na 24 na na na
Kallio (2002) [35] PD patients, untreated, fast Fourier transform analysis HFms2, HFnu short 32 58 24 54 na na
Kallio (2004), 1 [36] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, awake HFms2, HFnu long 21 58 22 56 1.8 1.5
Kallio (2004), 2 [36] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, REM HFms2, HFnu long 21 58 22 56 1.8 1.5
Kallio (2004), 3 [36] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, sleep stage 1 HFms2, HFnu long 21 58 22 56 1.8 1.5
Kallio (2004), 4 [36] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, sleep stage 2 HFms2, HFnu long 21 58 22 56 1.8 1.5
Kallio (2004), 5 [36] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, sleep stage 3 HFms2, HFnu long 21 58 22 56 1.8 1.5
Kallio (2004), 6 [36] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, sleep stage 4 HFms2, HFnu long 21 58 22 56 1.8 1.5
Kanegusuku (2017), 1 [37] effect of progressive resistance training, PD training group HFnu short 15 67 16 68 8.5 2.5
Kanegusuku (2017), 2 [37] effect of progressive resistance training, PD control group HFnu short 12 63 16 68 9.0 2.4
Kang (2012) [38] association with olfactory dysfunction HFms2 * short 15 66 18 60 na 1.7
Katagiri (2015) [39] association with myocardial scintigraphy HFms2 short 50 66 50 67 na na
Ke (2017) [40] association with sympathetic skin response HFms2, RMSSD, pNN50 long 48 69 30 63 5.4 na
Kim (2016), 1 [41] PD patients, mild stage RMSSD, pNN50 long 106 66 25 67 2.2 1.1
Kim (2016), 2 [41] PD patients, moderate stage RMSSD, pNN50 long 51 72 25 67 4.5 2.2
Kim (2016), 3 [41] PD patients, severe stage RMSSD, pNN50 long 31 71 25 67 5.8 3.2
Kiyono (2012) [42] ambulatory setting, daytime HF (ln) *, RMSSD long 10 69 60 69 10.7 3.6
Liou (2013), 1 [43] association with electroencephalography, quiet breathing HFnu short 26 67 23 65 2.6 1.3
Liou (2013), 2 [43] association with electroencephalography, deep breathing HFnu short 26 67 23 65 2.6 1.3
Maetzler (2015) [44] association with sympathetic skin response, metronomic breathing HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 45 66 26 65 3.8 2.1
Meco (2000), 1 [45] effect of treatment with Tolcapone (before treatment), daytime HFms2 long 7 70 7 na 14.1 2.1
Meco (2000), 2 [45] effect of treatment with Tolcapone (before treatment), nighttime HFms2 long 7 70 7 na 14.1 2.1
Mihci (2006) [46] ambulatory setting, 24 h RMSSD, pNN50 long 23 66 15 67 5.5 2.5 #
Niwa (2011), 1 [47] PD patients, early stage, daytime HFms2 long 9 71 30 69 4.8 na
Niwa (2011), 2 [47] PD patients, early stage, nighttime HFms2 long 9 71 30 69 4.8 na
Niwa (2011), 3 [47] PD patients, advanced stage, daytime HFms2 long 18 69 30 69 7.1 na
Niwa (2011), 4 [47] PD patients, advanced stage, nighttime HFms2 long 18 69 30 69 7.1 na
Pursiainen (2002), 1 [48] PD patients, untreated, daytime HFms2 long 44 63 43 60 1.7 1.8
Pursiainen (2002), 2 [48] PD patients, untreated, nighttime HFms2 long 44 63 43 60 1.7 1.8
Pyatigorskaya (2016), 1 [49] association with magnetic resonance imaging, slow wave sleep HFnu long 47 62 23 60 na 2.0
Pyatigorskaya (2016), 2 [49] association with magnetic resonance imaging, REM sleep HFnu long 47 62 23 60 na 2.0
Rocchi (2018) [50] comparison to second control group (REM sleep behavior disorder) HFnu short 17 68 12 69 2.3 na
Rocha (2018) [51] effect of game therapy training (before training) HFnu, RMSSD short 31 78 40 72 8.0 2.0
Sauvageot (2011), 1 [52] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, Non REM HFnu, pNN50 long 35 66 35 65 6.6 2.4
Sauvageot (2011), 2 [52] association with nocturnal sleep patterns, REM HFnu, pNN50 long 35 66 35 65 6.6 2.4
Solla (2015), 1 [53] PD patients, tremor dominant subtype HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 long 17 63 17 65 6.0 2.1
Solla (2015), 2 [53] PD patients, akinetic-rigid subtype HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 long 11 66 17 65 7.9 2.7
Sorensen (2013), 1 [54] association with rapid-eye movement sleep behavior, awake HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 10 63 10 59 na 1.4
Sorensen (2013), 2 [54] association without rapid-eye movement sleep behavior, awake HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 13 61 10 59 na 0.9
Sorensen (2013), 3 [54] association with rapid-eye movement sleep behavior, Non REM HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 10 63 10 59 na 1.4
Sorensen (2013), 4 [54] association without rapid-eye movement sleep behavior, Non REM HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 13 61 10 59 na 0.9
Sorensen (2013), 5 [54] association with rapid-eye movement sleep behavior, REM HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 10 63 10 59 na 1.4
Sorensen (2013), 6 [54] association without rapid-eye movement sleep behavior, REM HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 13 61 10 59 na 0.9
Sriranjini (2011) [55] effect of a single dose L-dopa (before intake) HFms2, HFnu, RMSSD, pNN50 short 11 57 11 55 4.1 2.1
Sumi (2012), 1 [56] effect of deep brain stimulation (before stimulation), off medication HFms2 short 28 62 13 58 22.0 3.9
Sumi (2012), 2 [56] effect of deep brain stimulation (before stimulation), on medication HFms2 short 28 62 13 58 22.0 2.4
Szili-Török (1999), 1 [57] association with baroreflex sensitivity, normal HF (ms/Hz) *, RMSSD, pNN50 short 12 64 18 65 na 2.0
Szili-Török (1999), 2 [57] association with baroreflex sensitivity, impaired HF (ms/Hz) *, RMSSD, pNN50 short 8 67 18 65 na 2.1
Trachani (2012) [58] effect of deep brain stimulation (before stimulation) HFms2 *, HFnu * short 24 62 24 na 12.8 3.1
Valenza (2016) [59] computational assessment of heartbeat dynamics HFms2 short 30 67 29 61 na na
Visanji (2017), 1 [60] PD patients, LRRK2-associated HF (log) *, RMSSD * short 20 64 32 59 11.5 na
Visanji (2017), 2 [60] PD patients, idiopathic HF (log) *, RMSSD * short 26 64 32 59 6.2 na
Walter (2018) [61] association with vagus nerve atrophy RMSSD * short 20 73 20 70 10.1 na
Weise (2015) [62] association with auricular branch of vagus nerve stimulation HF (ln) * short 50 64 50 64 6.4 2.3
Yoon (2016) [63] PD patients, tremor dominant subtype, drug naiv HFms2, RMSSD short 27 64 23 63 1.6 na
Zawadka-Kunikowska (2017), 1 [64] association with peripheral vascular resistance, vasodilation reaction HFms2 short 15 67 47 66 9.0 2.9
Zawadka-Kunikowska (2017), 2 [64] association with peripheral vascular resistance, vasoconstriction reaction HFms2 short 41 69 47 66 6.0 2.0

Values are given as the mean, unless otherwise indicated: #: values are given as the median; na: nonreported data; *: not considered in further analyses because data are not plausible or reported in rarely used units; HC: healthy controls; HF: high-frequency components of the power spectral density; nu: normalized units; PD: Parkinson’s disease; pNN50: number of normal-to-normal intervals differing by more than 50 ms divided by the total number of normal-to-normal intervals; RMSSD: root mean square of successive normal-to-normal interval difference.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.G.H. and T.P.; methodology, K.G.H., P.S. and T.P.; software, K.G.H., T.L. and P.S.; validation, K.G.H. and T.P.; formal analysis, K.G.H., T.L., P.S. and T.P.; data curation, K.G.H. and T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, K.G.H.; writing—review and editing, T.P. and P.S.; visualization, K.G.H.; supervision, P.S. and T.P.; project administration, K.G.H. and T.P.; funding acquisition, K.G.H. and T.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding to K.G.H. is provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) in the Clinician Scientist-Program OrganAge, funding number WI 830/12-1. Also, funding is provided by the Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research of the Medical Faculty Jena. T.P. received funding from a Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) grant (01GY1804). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or writing of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Antony P.M., Diederich N.J., Kruger R., Balling R. The hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J. 2013;280:5981–5993. doi: 10.1111/febs.12335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Titova N., Qamar M.A., Chaudhuri K.R. The Nonmotor Features of Parkinson’s Disease. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2017;132:33–54. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2017.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen H., Zhao E.J., Zhang W., Lu Y., Liu R., Huang X., Ciesielski-Jones A.J., Justice M.A., Cousins D.S., Peddada S. Meta-analyses on prevalence of selected Parkinson’s nonmotor symptoms before and after diagnosis. Transl. Neurodegener. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hawkes C.H., Del Tredici K., Braak H. Parkinson’s disease: A dual-hit hypothesis. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2007;33:599–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2007.00874.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schwiertz A., Spiegel J., Dillmann U., Grundmann D., Burmann J., Fassbender K., Schafer K.H., Unger M.M. Fecal markers of intestinal inflammation and intestinal permeability are elevated in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2018;50:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Forsyth C.B., Shannon K.M., Kordower J.H., Voigt R.M., Shaikh M., Jaglin J.A., Estes J.D., Dodiya H.B., Keshavarzian A. Increased intestinal permeability correlates with sigmoid mucosa alpha-synuclein staining and endotoxin exposure markers in early Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Braak H., Rub U., Gai W.P., Del Tredici K. Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: Possible routes by which vulnerable neuronal types may be subject to neuroinvasion by an unknown pathogen. J. Neural Transm. 2003;110:517–536. doi: 10.1007/s00702-002-0808-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ask T.F., Lugo R.G., Sutterlin S. The Neuro-Immuno-Senescence Integrative Model (NISIM) on the Negative Association Between Parasympathetic Activity and Cellular Senescence. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12:726. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goldstein D.S. Dysautonomia in Parkinson disease. Compr. Physiol. 2014;4:805–826. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zis P., Erro R., Walton C.C., Sauerbier A., Chaudhuri K.R. The range and nature of non-motor symptoms in drug-naive Parkinson’s disease patients: A state-of-the-art systematic review. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2015;1:15013. doi: 10.1038/npjparkd.2015.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shaffer F., Ginsberg J.P. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front. Public Health. 2017;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. The North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996;93:1043–1065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gotzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P., Clarke M., Devereaux P.J., Kleijnen J., Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wan X., Wang W., Liu J., Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014;14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Karemaker J.M. Counterpoint: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is due to the baroreflex mechanism. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2009;106:1742–1743; discussion 1744. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91107.2008a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Da Costa B.R., Cevallos M., Altman D.G., Rutjes A.W., Egger M. Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: Bibliographic study. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harrer M., Cuijpers P., Furukawa T.A., Ebert D. Doing Meta-Analysis in R: A Hands-on Guide. [(accessed on 31 January 2021)]; Available online: https://bookdown.org/MathiasHarrer/Doing_Meta_Analysis_in_R/
  • 18.Allan L.M., Ballard C.G., Allen J., Murray A., Davidson A.W., McKeith I.G., Kenny R.A. Autonomic dysfunction in dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2007;78:671–677. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.102343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arnao V., Cinturino A., Mastrilli S., Butta C., Maida C., Tuttolomondo A., Aridon P., D’Amelio M. Impaired circadian heart rate variability in Parkinson’s disease: A time-domain analysis in ambulatory setting. BMC Neurol. 2020;20:152. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01722-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Asahina M., Mathias C.J., Katagiri A., Low D.A., Vichayanrat E., Fujinuma Y., Yamanaka Y., Kuwabara S. Sudomotor and cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with early untreated Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4:385–393. doi: 10.3233/JPD-130326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Barbic F., Perego F., Canesi M., Gianni M., Biagiotti S., Costantino G., Pezzoli G., Porta A., Malliani A., Furlan R. Early abnormalities of vascular and cardiac autonomic control in Parkinson’s disease without orthostatic hypotension. Hypertension. 2007;49:120–126. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000250939.71343.7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bouhaddi M., Vuillier F., Fortrat J.O., Cappelle S., Henriet M.T., Rumbach L., Regnard J. Impaired cardiovascular autonomic control in newly and long-term-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease: Involvement of L-dopa therapy. Auton. Neurosci. 2004;116:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brisinda D., Sorbo A.R., Di Giacopo R., Venuti A., Bentivoglio A.R., Fenici R. Cardiovascular autonomic nervous system evaluation in Parkinson disease and multiple system atrophy. J. Neurol. Sci. 2014;336:197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brown R., Duma S., Piguet O., Broe G.A., Macefield V.G. Cardiovascular variability in Parkinson’s disease and extrapyramidal motor slowing. Clin. Auton. Res. 2012;22:191–196. doi: 10.1007/s10286-012-0163-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Buob A., Winter H., Kindermann M., Becker G., Moller J.C., Oertel W.H., Bohm M. Parasympathetic but not sympathetic cardiac dysfunction at early stages of Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2010;99:701–706. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0170-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Carricarte Naranjo C., Marras C., Visanji N.P., Cornforth D.J., Sanchez-Rodriguez L., Schule B., Goldman S.M., Estevez M., Stein P.K., Lang A.E., et al. Increased markers of cardiac vagal activity in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2-associated Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Auton. Res. 2019;29:603–614. doi: 10.1007/s10286-019-00632-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Delgado G., Estanol B., Rodriguez-Violante M., Martinez-Memije R., Infante-Vazquez O., Bertado-Ramirez N. Cardiovascular variability in Mexican patients with Parkinson’s disease. Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2014;72:762–767. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20140125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Devos D., Kroumova M., Bordet R., Vodougnon H., Guieu J.D., Libersa C., Destee A. Heart rate variability and Parkinson’s disease severity. J. Neural. Transm. 2003;110:997–1011. doi: 10.1007/s00702-003-0016-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gjerloff T., Fedorova T., Knudsen K., Munk O.L., Nahimi A., Jacobsen S., Danielsen E.H., Terkelsen A.J., Hansen J., Pavese N., et al. Imaging acetylcholinesterase density in peripheral organs in Parkinson’s disease with 11C-donepezil PET. Brain. 2015;138:653–663. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haapaniemi T.H., Pursiainen V., Korpelainen J.T., Huikuri H.V., Sotaniemi K.A., Myllyla V.V. Ambulatory ECG and analysis of heart rate variability in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2001;70:305–310. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.3.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harnod D., Wen S.H., Chen S.Y., Harnod T. The association of heart rate variability with parkinsonian motor symptom duration. Yonsei Med. J. 2014;55:1297–1302. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jain S., Siegle G.J., Gu C., Moore C.G., Ivanco L.S., Jennings J.R., Steinhauer S.R., Studenski S., Greenamyre J.T. Autonomic insufficiency in pupillary and cardiovascular systems in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2011;17:119–122. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jaipurkar R., Mohan L., Tomar R. Autonomic cardiovascular regulation in Parkinson’s disease by head-up tilt tes-A cross-sectional study. Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2018;8:1287–1292. doi: 10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0413615052018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kallio M., Haapaniemi T., Turkka J., Suominen K., Tolonen U., Sotaniemi K., Heikkila V.P., Myllyla V. Heart rate variability in patients with untreated Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2000;7:667–672. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.00127.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kallio M., Suominen K., Bianchi A.M., Makikallio T., Haapaniemi T., Astafiev S., Sotaniemi K.A., Myllya V.V., Tolonen U. Comparison of heart rate variability analysis methods in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2002;40:408–414. doi: 10.1007/BF02345073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kallio M., Suominen K., Haapaniemi T., Sotaniemi K., Myllyla V.V., Astafiev S., Tolonen U. Nocturnal cardiac autonomic regulation in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Auton. Res. 2004;14:119–124. doi: 10.1007/s10286-004-0173-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kanegusuku H., Silva-Batista C., Pecanha T., Nieuwboer A., Silva N.D., Jr., Costa L.A., de Mello M.T., Piemonte M.E., Ugrinowitsch C., Forjaz C.L. Effects of Progressive Resistance Training on Cardiovascular Autonomic Regulation in Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2017;98:2134–2141. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kang P., Kloke J., Jain S. Olfactory dysfunction and parasympathetic dysautonomia in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Auton. Res. 2012;22:161–166. doi: 10.1007/s10286-012-0158-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Katagiri A., Asahina M., Araki N., Poudel A., Fujinuma Y., Yamanaka Y., Kuwabara S. Myocardial (123)I-MIBG Uptake and Cardiovascular Autonomic Function in Parkinson’s Disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2015;2015:805351. doi: 10.1155/2015/805351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ke J.Q., Shao S.M., Zheng Y.Y., Fu F.W., Zheng G.Q., Liu C.F. Sympathetic skin response and heart rate variability in predicting autonomic disorders in patients with Parkinson disease. Medicine. 2017;96:e6523. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim J.S., Lee S.H., Oh Y.S., Park J.W., An J.Y., Park S.K., Han S.R., Lee K.S. Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction in Mild and Advanced Parkinson’s Disease. J. Mov. Disord. 2016;9:97–103. doi: 10.14802/jmd.16001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kiyono K., Hayano J., Kwak S., Watanabe E., Yamamoto Y. Non-gaussianity of low frequency heart rate variability and sympathetic activation: Lack of increases in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson disease. Front. Physiol. 2012;3:34. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liou L.M., Ruge D., Chang Y.P., Wu M.N., Hsu C.Y., Lin C.W., Tsai C.L., Lai C.L. Functional connectivity between lateral premotor-parietal circuits and the cardiac autonomic system in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2013;326:48–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maetzler W., Karam M., Berger M.F., Heger T., Maetzler C., Ruediger H., Bronzova J., Lobo P.P., Ferreira J.J., Ziemssen T., et al. Time- and frequency-domain parameters of heart rate variability and sympathetic skin response in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neura.l Transm. 2015;122:419–425. doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1276-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Meco G., Vanacore N., Locuratolo N., Bonifati V.V., Vella C., Giovani A., Tubani L., Baratta L., Mastrocola C. Heart rate variability in Parkinson’s disease patients treated with tolcapone. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2000;6:223–227. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(00)00016-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mihci E., Kardelen F., Dora B., Balkan S. Orthostatic heart rate variability analysis in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2006;113:288–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00580.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Niwa F., Kuriyama N., Nakagawa M., Imanishi J. Circadian rhythm of rest activity and autonomic nervous system activity at different stages in Parkinson’s disease. Auton. Neurosci. 2011;165:195–200. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pursiainen V., Haapaniemi T.H., Korpelainen J.T., Huikuri H.V., Sotaniemi K.A., Myllyla V.V. Circadian heart rate variability in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. 2002;249:1535–1540. doi: 10.1007/s00415-002-0884-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pyatigorskaya N., Mongin M., Valabregue R., Yahia-Cherif L., Ewenczyk C., Poupon C., Debellemaniere E., Vidailhet M., Arnulf I., Lehericy S. Medulla oblongata damage and cardiac autonomic dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2016;87:2540–2545. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rocchi C., Placidi F., Liguori C., Del Bianco C., Lauretti B., Diomedi M., Pisani A., Mercuri N.B., Izzi F. Daytime autonomic activity in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: A preliminary study. Sleep Med. 2018;52:163–167. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rocha R.S.B., De Oliveira Rocha L.S., Pena E.S.M., Caldas L.C.P., Moreno M.A. Analysis of autonomic modulation of heart rate in patients with Parkinson’s disease and elderly individuals submitted to game therapy training. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2018;18:20–25. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sauvageot N., Vaillant M., Diederich N.J. Reduced sympathetically driven heart rate variability during sleep in Parkinson’s disease: A case-control polysomnography-based study. Mov. Disord. 2011;26:234–240. doi: 10.1002/mds.23479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Solla P., Cadeddu C., Cannas A., Deidda M., Mura N., Mercuro G., Marrosu F. Heart rate variability shows different cardiovascular modulation in Parkinson’s disease patients with tremor dominant subtype compared to those with akinetic rigid dominant subtype. J. Neural. Transm. 2015;122:1441–1446. doi: 10.1007/s00702-015-1393-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sorensen G.L., Mehlsen J., Jennum P. Reduced sympathetic activity in idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder and Parkinson’s disease. Auton. Neurosci. 2013;179:138–141. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2013.08.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sriranjini S.J., Ganesan M., Datta K., Pal P.K., Sathyaprabha T.N. Effect of a single dose of standard levodopa on cardiac autonomic function in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol. India. 2011;59:659–663. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.86536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sumi K., Katayama Y., Otaka T., Obuchi T., Kano T., Kobayashi K., Oshima H., Fukaya C., Yamamoto T., Ogawa Y., et al. Effect of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on the autonomic nervous system in Parkinson’s disease patients assessed by spectral analyses of R-R interval variability and blood pressure variability. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 2012;90:248–254. doi: 10.1159/000338090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Szili-Török T., Rudas L., Dibó G., Paprika D., Kardos A. Abnormal cardiovascular autonomic regulation in Parkinson´s disease. J. Clin. Basic Cardiol. 1999;2:245–247. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Trachani E., Constantoyannis C., Sakellaropoulos G.C., Stavrinou M.L., Nikiforidis G., Chroni E. Heart rate variability in Parkinson’s disease unaffected by deep brain stimulation. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2012;126:56–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.1605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Valenza G., Orsolini S., Diciotti S., Citi L., Scilingo E.P., Guerrisi M., Danti S., Lucetti C., Tessa C., Barbieri R., et al. Assessment of spontaneus cardiovascular oscillations in Parkinson´s disease. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2016;26:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2015.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Visanji N.P., Bhudhikanok G.S., Mestre T.A., Ghate T., Udupa K., AlDakheel A., Connolly B.S., Gasca-Salas C., Kern D.S., Jain J., et al. Heart rate variability in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2-associated Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2017;32:610–614. doi: 10.1002/mds.26896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Walter U., Tsiberidou P., Kersten M., Storch A., Lohle M. Atrophy of the Vagus Nerve in Parkinson’s Disease Revealed by High-Resolution Ultrasonography. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:805. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Weise D., Adamidis M., Pizzolato F., Rumpf J.J., Fricke C., Classen J. Assessment of brainstem function with auricular branch of vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yoon J.H., Kim M.S., Lee S.M., Kim H.J., Hong J.M. Heart rate variability to differentiate essential tremor from early-stage tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016;368:55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.06.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zawadka-Kunikowska M., Slomko J., Tafil-Klawe M., Klawe J.J., Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska A., Newton J.L., Zalewski P. Role of peripheral vascular resistance as an indicator of cardiovascular abnormalities in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2017;44:1089–1098. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Braak H., Ghebremedhin E., Rub U., Bratzke H., Del Tredici K. Stages in the development of Parkinson’s disease-related pathology. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;318:121–134. doi: 10.1007/s00441-004-0956-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Goetz C.G., Fahn S., Martinez-Martin P., Poewe W., Sampaio C., Stebbins G.T., Stern M.B., Tilley B.C., Dodel R., Dubois B., et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov. Disord. 2007;22:41–47. doi: 10.1002/mds.21198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nunan D., Sandercock G.R., Brodie D.A. A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2010;33:1407–1417. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Geovanini G.R., Vasques E.R., de Oliveira Alvim R., Mill J.G., Andreao R.V., Vasques B.K., Pereira A.C., Krieger J.E. Age and Sex Differences in Heart Rate Variability and Vagal Specific Patterns-Baependi Heart Study. Glob. Heart. 2020;15:71. doi: 10.5334/gh.873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sammito S., Bockelmann I. Reference values for time- and frequency-domain heart rate variability measures. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1309–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Abhishekh H.A., Nisarga P., Kisan R., Meghana A., Chandran S., Trichur R., Sathyaprabha T.N. Influence of age and gender on autonomic regulation of heart. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2013;27:259–264. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9424-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Koenig J., Thayer J.F. Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: A meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016;64:288–310. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hayano J., Yuda E. Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2019;38:3. doi: 10.1186/s40101-019-0193-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chelban V., Vichayanrat E., Schottlaende L., Iodice V., Houlden H. Autonomic dysfunction in genetic forms of synucleinopathies. Mov. Disord. 2018;33:359–371. doi: 10.1002/mds.27343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yasuma F., Hayano J. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Why does the heartbeat synchronize with respiratory rhythm? Chest. 2004;125:683–690. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Brain Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES