Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Aug 27;16(8):e0256816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256816

Characterization of linear epitope specificity of antibodies potentially contributing to spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus

Asma Ahsan 1,#, Saira Dar 1,#, Fareeha Hassan 1, Farkhanda Ghafoor 2, Muhammad Haroon Yousuf 3, Syed Shahzad-ul-Hussan 1,*
Editor: Sripathi M Sureban4
PMCID: PMC8396737  PMID: 34449828

Abstract

Background

Around 30% of the HCV infected patients can spontaneously clear the virus. Cumulative evidence suggests the role of neutralizing antibodies in such spontaneous resolution. Understanding the epitope specificity of such antibodies will inform the rational vaccine design as such information is limited to date. In addition to conformational epitope targeted antibodies, linear epitope specific antibodies have been identified that are broadly cross reactive against diverse HCV strains. In this study, we have characterized the potential role of three conserved linear epitopes in the spontaneous clearance of HCV.

Methods

We tested the reactivity of sera from chronic patients (CP) and spontaneous resolvers (SR) with linear peptides corresponding to three conserved regions of HCV envelope protein E2 spanning amino acids 412–423, 523–532 and 432–443 using ELISA. Subsequently, we characterized the dependency of HCV neutralization by the reactive serum samples on the antibodies specific for these epitopes using pseudoparticle-based neutralization assay.

In ELISA most of the CP sera showed reactivity to multiple peptides while most of the SR samples were reactive to a single peptide suggesting presence of more specific antibodies in the SR sera. In most of the HCVpp neutralizing sera of particular peptide reactivity the neutralization was significantly affected by the presence of respective peptide. HCV neutralization by CP sera was affected by multiple peptides while 75% of the HCVpp neutralizing SR sera were competed by the 432 epitope.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that individuals who spontaneously resolve HCV infection at the acute phase, can produce antibodies specific for conserved linear epitopes, and those antibodies can potentially play a role in the spontaneous viral clearance. The epitope present in the 432–443 region of E2 was identified as the primary neutralizing epitope with potential role in spontaneous viral clearance and this epitope potentiates for the design of immunogen for prophylactic vaccine.

Introduction

Globally, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections occur in over 71 million people with a mortality rate of around 400,000 [13]. Although the paradigm shift from interferon to direct acting antiviral (DAA) regimens has significantly improved the situation in developed countries to combat the infection as most of these DAAs are highly efficacious [4,5]. However, the global impact of these treatments is limited by several factors. Globally, only a small proportion of the HCV infected individuals has been estimated to have access to DAAs [68]. Due to the asymptomatic nature of the infection, many infected individuals in developing countries remain unaware of their infection status to pursue treatment. Moreover, cost ineffectiveness of DAAs and high mutation index of the virus leading to the emergence of escape mutants and drug resistant viral variants are other contributing factors to the limited global impact of these DAAs [912]. Therefore, a prophylactic vaccine is required to effectively control the HCV infections. Understanding of the underlying mechanism of immune response particularly details of epitope recognition by neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) would provide guidance in vaccine design perspective.

Around 30% of the HCV infected individuals can spontaneously clear the virus at the acute phase [13,14]. While effective cellular immune response has been described for the successful viral clearance [15], emerging evidence suggest the role of NAbs in such clearance [1619]. Although the role of NAbs in spontaneous resolution of the HCV infection is well established, very limited information is available about the epitope specificity of such antibodies.

The E2 envelope glycoprotein primarily mediates viral interactions with different cellular receptors at the early stage of viral entry and is the main target for NAbs. The E2 protein incorporates conformational as well as linear epitopes of NAbs. Three of the highly conserved epitopes of cross-reactive NAbs have been mapped in the E2 regions spanning residues 412–423, 432–443 and 523–532, which here we will refer to as the 412-epitope, the 432-epitope and the 523-epitope, respectively (S1 Fig). These regions are the part of the CD81 receptor-binding site and are located in the neutralizing face of the E2 structure [2023]. Most of the known antibodies specific for the 523-epitope recognize this site as a part of conformational epitope. However, NAbs specific for the 412- and the 432-epitopes either recognize these sites as linear epitopes or as a part of conformational epitopes [24]. Some of the most potent antibodies that can neutralize a broad range of circulating HCV strains are targeted against these regions and are linear epitope specific [25,26]. At least one of these linear epitope specific antibodies has shown protection in Chimpanzees [27]. On the basis of the demonstrated role of linear epitopes to elecit broadly neutralizing antibodies we hypothesized that linear epitope specific antibodies can have potential role in spontaneous clearance of HCV. Here, we characterized the conserved linear epitope specificity of antibodies present in the sera of chronic patients and spontaneous-resolvers to decipher the details of neutralizing epitopes important for spontaneous resolution of the infection.

Materials and methods

Blood collection and serum separation

Ethical Committees of Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Shalamar Hospital approved the study with reference number: LUMS-IRB/2017-01-12. After the approval and written informed consents, we collected blood samples from 84 individuals including 30 CP, 49 SR and 5 healthy donors. Blood was collected in plain vacutainers and subsequently the serum was separated and stored at -20°C. Spontaneous resolvers were identified on the basis of positive anti-HCV antibody response and negative viral RNA detection twice with an interval of four weeks. These were identified through screening of patients visiting primary care and gastroenterology clinics of Shalamar Hospital and Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute (PKLI) by performing relevant diagnostic tests. None of these individuals was aware of his/her past HCV infection that had been cleared without pursuing treatment. Chronically infected patients were identified on the basis persistent infection (viral load) for over six months or those who had developed symptoms of early hepatic cirrhosis. Healthy uninfected donors were defined as individuals with no present or past infection of HCV.

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Solutions of linear peptides were prepared in 50 mM sodium carbonate–bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at final concentrations of 5 μg/ml. ELISA plates (Thermo scientific Immulon 4HBX) were coated with 100 μl of peptide antigens and incubated overnight at 4°C. Next day plate surface was blocked using 200 μl of blocking buffer (5% skimmed milk/BSA) after removing peptide solution, incubated at room temperature for 2 hours and washed with 200 μl of washing buffer (0.02% sodium azide in PBS). Primary monoclonal antibody, Ap33 as well as patient sera were diluted in PBS, 50 μl of which was added per well in triplicates and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. The AP33 antibody was kindly provided by Dr Arvind Patel, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow. BSA-coated wells and blank wells containing only carbonate buffer served as negative controls for nonspecific binding. Plate was washed and incubated for 1 hour with goat anti-human alkaline phosphatase conjugated IgG (Santa Cruz, sc-2454) for human serum samples and goat anti-mouse alkaline phosphatase conjugated IgG (Abcam, ab97020) as secondary antibodies at 1000-fold dilution. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm on Synergy HTX reader after adding p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate [28,29]. Data was plotted using the Graphpad prism software.

HCV neutralization assay

HCV neutralization of serum samples was evaluated using HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp) expressing luciferase reporter gene as previously described [30]. In brief, HEK293T cells seeded for 24 hours in T-75 flask were co-transfected with 6 μg of HCV envelope expressing vector and 18 μg of pNL4-3.Luc.R- E- backbone vector also containing luciferase reporter gene using lipofectamine-3000 as a transfection reagent. The HCV genotype-1a (strain H77) envelope-expressing vector was kindly provided by Dr Parizia Farci at NIAID, NIH, USA while the backbone vector was obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH. VSV-G-enveloped plasmid was used to produce VSVpp as nonspecific control. Supernatant containing pseudoparticles was harvested on day 5 after transfection, centrifuged at 2000 rpm, filtered through a 0.45 μm filter and stored at -80°C. For neutralization, Huh7.5 cells (1.5 × 104 cells per well) were seeded into a 96-well plate in 100 μl of growth medium and incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Serum samples were heated at 56°C for 30 minutes followed by centrifugation at 1200xg. From the supernatants, serum dilutions were prepared in cDMEM media and incubated with HCVpp for 1.5 hours. Subsequently, serum-HCVpp mix was transferred to wells containing Huh7.5 cells and media was changed after 6 hours. After 72 hr of infection media was removed and cells were lysed by adding 50 μL of 1x GloLysis buffer (Promega). Cell lysate was transferred to white opaque plates and luminescence was measured by adding 45 μL of luciferase substrate (Promega). Percent neutralization of each sample was calculated by comparing with the control containing no serum and ED50 values were calculated from the dose response curve.

Peptide competition assay

100 μl of peptide stock solution (125 μg/ml) was incubated with 100 μl of serum dilution at 37°C for 2 hours on gentle rocking. The mix was centrifuged at 15000 rpm, 37°C for 10 min, and supernatant was collected. 180 μl of supernatant was mixed with 150 μl media containing HCVpp and incubated for 1 hour. HCV neutralization assay was repeated as discussed in the previous section [31].

Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections was used to compare HCV neutralization by peptide treated serum samples with untreated ones and significance was defined as *p≤0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001 ****p ≤ 0.0001.

Results

Linear epitopes to delineate the reactivity of serum samples

To delineate the linear epitope specificity of antibodies in the sera of chronic patients (CP) and spontaneous-resolvers (SR), peptides corresponding to three highly conserved regions of E2 spanning amino acids aa 412–423, aa 523–532 and aa 432–443 were synthesized in consensus sequence of all major genotypes of HCV (Table 1) as we were unaware of the viral genotype that had infected spontaneous resolvers. In some of the peptides with poor predicted solubility, more polar residues were added at the termini to increase their solubility index.

Table 1. Details of peptides with amino acid sequences corresponding to conserved linear epitopes present in the E2 envelope protein.

Epitope name Length (aa) Amino acid sequence Sequential position in E2
412 16 KKQLVNTNGSWHINKK* 412–423
432 14 SLNTGFIAGLFYKK* 432–443
523 14 *RSGAPTYSWGANKK* 523–532

* The residues at the termini written in italic letters were added to increase the solubility of the peptide but these are not the part of viral protein sequence.

Reactivity of serum samples to conserved linear epitopes

We used ELISA to profile the reactivity of antibodies in the sera of 84 individuals including 30 CPs, 49 SRs and 5 healthy donors with peptides corresponding to three conserved linear epitopes. In this regard, reactivity of every serum was tested at three different dilutions, 10-fold, 100-fold and 1000-fold. Cutoff was defined as mean optical density (OD) at 405 nm plus 3x the standard deviation from five healthy serum samples. At 10-fold dilution the reactivity of CP sera for the 432-, the 412- and the 523-epitopes were observed in 63%, 43% and 30% of the samples, respectively (Fig 1a). However, at 100-fold dilution only 1 out of 30 samples was reactive to the 412- and the 523-epitopes while 33% of the samples showed reactivity to the 432-epitope (Fig 1a) suggesting the presence of high titers of the 432-epitope specific antibodies. Most of the CP samples were reactive to multiple epitopes (Figs 1a and 2).

Fig 1. ELISA-based reactivity of three peptides corresponding to conserved linear epitopes, with CP and SR serum samples.

Fig 1

ELISA was performed using peptides corresponding to three conserved linear epitopes, the 412-epitope, the 432-epitope and the 523-epitope, against three different serum dilutions (10-fold, 100-fold, 1000-fold) of (a) 30 serum samples from chronic patients and (b) 49 serum samples from spontaneous resolvers. Dotted line represents the cutoff value using the mean value from five healthy serum controls plus three times the standard deviation.

Fig 2. Comparison of the CP and the SR sera for their reactivity to a single epitope or multiple epitopes.

Fig 2

In case of the SR serum samples, the observed reactivity was more specific. Only 47% of the SR samples (23 of 49) showed reactivity to any of the peptides. From these samples 78% were reactive to the 432-epitope, while 21% and 17% showed reactivity to the 412- and the 523-epitopes, respectively at 10-fold dilutions. At 100-fold dilutions, reactivity against the 432- and the 412-epitopes was observed in 30% and 13% samples, respectively (Fig 1b). Contrary to the CP samples, most of the positive serum samples from SR group were reactive to a single epitope primarily the 432-epitope– 82% of the reactive SR samples were single epitope specific and 80% of which were specific to the 432-epitope (Figs 1b and 2). This analysis indicated that antibodies reactive to any of these peptides were present only in 47% of the tested SR serum samples while 87% of the CP samples were reactive to these peptides. Secondly, CP sera contained antibodies specific for multiple epitopes while in the SR group most of the samples were reactive to a single epitope.

HCV neutralization

The serum samples reactive to any of the peptides in ELISA were tested for their ability to neutralize HCV in pseudo-typed virus based neutralization assay. In this regard, initially we used 50-fold serum dilution to obtain preliminary data. Serum samples with more than 30% neutralization in the initial tests were subjected to measure effective dilution with 50% neutralization (ED50) through dose response curve. Five serum samples from healthy individuals were also subjected to test their HCV neutralizing activity at 10-fold dilution. None of the healthy serum samples showed any HCVpp neutralization. Moreover, five of the chronic serum samples were tested against VSVpp to rule out the non-specific neutralizing effect. Only negligible neutralizing effect by two of the samples was observed at 10-fold dilution (S2 Fig) suggesting their specificity for HCV. Five of the CP samples showed ED50 values higher than 1:500 against HCVpp with the most potent sample showing ED50 value of 1:5137. Most of these potent CP serum samples had shown reactivity to multiple peptides (Fig 3 and Table 2). Overall, out of 26 reactive CP serum samples 11 neutralized HCVpp with minimum ED50 values of 1:75 (Table 2).

Fig 3. Dose response curves of selected CP serum samples to measure their ED50 values in HCVpp neutralization assay.

Fig 3

Dose response curves showing neutralization of HCVpp by serum samples of chronic patients. Serum samples at varying dilutions were mixed with HCVpp at 37°C and subsequently added to the wells containing Huh7.5 cells. After 72 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Subsequently, percent neutralization of each dilution was calculated by comparing with the control containing no serum.

Table 2. Details of peptide reactivity (epitope specificity) and HCVpp neutralization activity of different CP and SR serum samples.

Chronic Patients Spontaneous Resolvers
Sample ID ED50 Epitope specificity* Sample ID ED50 Epitope specificity*
191 1:760 412, 432, 523 PK2 1:222 432
193 1:5137 412, 432, 523 PK3 1:850 432
201 1:356 412, 432 PK13 1:16 432
196 1:960 412, 432, 523 SH503 1:84 Non reactive
226 1:198 412, 432, 523 SH16 1:4 432, 523
336 1:1408 412, 432 SH511 1:212 432
843 1:610 412 PK4 1:10 432
2967 1:361 412, 432 PK7 1:113 432
574 1:75 412, 432 PK9 1:35 412
978 1:92 432, 412 PK10 1:11 432
762 1:127 412,432 PK14 1:31 412
SH19 1:48 412

For the SR group, we tested HCVpp neutralization of 23 serum samples that were reactive in ELISA along with a few additional non-reactive samples. Twelve of these samples neutralized HCVpp and were subjected to ED50 measurement through dose response curves (Fig 4, Table 2). Out of these 12 samples 8 were reactive to the 432-epitope including 7 reactive only to this epitope. The 432-epitope reactive serum samples had higher ED50 values as compared to other samples (Table 2) indicating higher titers of 432-epitope reactive antibodies. Three of the HCV neutralizing SR samples were specific only to the 412-epitope; one sample had dual reactivity with the 523-epitope and the 432-epitope, and one (sample SH503) was not reactive to any of the three peptides (Table 2).

Fig 4. Dose response curves of selected SR serum samples to measure their ED50 values in HCVpp neutralization assay.

Fig 4

Dose response curves showing neutralization of HCVpp by serum samples of spontaneous resolvers. Serum samples at varying dilutions were mixed with HCVpp at 37°C and subsequently added to the wells containing Huh7.5 cells. After 72 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Subsequently, percent neutralization of each dilution was calculated by comparing with the control containing no serum.

Peptide competition assay

To further clarify if the observed HCV neutralization by the serum samples was due to the linear epitope specific antibodies that were the source of reactivity in ELISA, we performed peptide competition HCV neutralization assay. In these experiments the HCV neutralizing sera reactive to specific linear epitopes were incubated with individual peptides before testing their viral neutralizing activity. Among the 10 CP sera tested in competition assay, 8 samples showed significant decrease in viral neutralization of the sera by the presence of competing peptides (Table 3). Four of these samples had specificity for the 523-epitope that contains some most conserved residues directly involved in the interactions with CD81 receptor during the viral cellular entry.

Table 3. Details of peptide reactivity (epitope specificity) and effect of respective peptides on HCVpp neutralization activity of different CP serum samples.

Sample ID Epitope specificity HCV neutralizing activity competed by peptides
191 412, 432, 523 412, 432, 523
193 412, 432, 523 412, 432, 523
201 412, 432 412, 432
196 412, 432, 523 432, 523
226 412, 432, 523 432, 523
336 412, 432 412, 432
843 412 No effect
2967 412, 432 412, 432
574 412, 432 432
762 412,432 No effect

For the SR group, 12 serum samples with HCVpp neutralization activity were subjected to competition assay including the one with no ELISA reactivity to any of the peptide. Apart from two serum samples, SH511 and SH19, HCV neutralizing activity of all peptide reactive samples were competed by the presence of respective peptides (Fig 5). Six of these samples had specificity for the 432-epitope and two were specific for the 412-epitope. A sample, SH16 that had shown reactivity to the 432- and the 523-epitopes, was competed by both of the peptides. A neutralizing serum sample without reactivity to any of the peptides was used in competition assay to rule out false positive effects, as its activity was not affected by any of the peptides. Moreover an irrelevant peptide corresponding to a part of the V3 domain of HIV gp120 was also used in competition assays as nonspecific peptide control. Overall, in 73% of the HCV neutralizing serum samples of particular linear epitope reactivity of the SR group the neutralization was significantly affected by the presence of respective peptides. Among these, 75% of the samples had specificity for the 432-epitope. Among all HCV neutralizing SR samples with ELISA reactivity, 54% of the samples showed their dependency primarily on the 432-epitope-targeted antibodies. Moreover, A serum sample showed its HCV neutralization dependency on the antibodies specific for the 523-epitope containing some highly conserved residues, and this epitope has rarely been observed as a linear neutralizing epitope before.

Fig 5. Effect of peptides corresponding to different conserved linear epitopes on HCVpp neutralization by the SR serum samples.

Fig 5

HCVpp neutralizing serum samples of spontaneous resolvers were incubated at 1:50 dilution with different peptides at 125 μg/ml concentration at 37°C for 2 hr before performing HCVpp neutralization assay. Column bars labeled with HCVpp represent 100% infection; column bars labeled with “Serum” represent HCV neutralization by the respective serum sample in the absence of peptide; and column bars labeled with “Serum+412”, “Serum+432” or “Serum+523” represent neutralization by the serum samples after incubation of that serum with respective peptides. Plus and minus signs at the tops of each graph indicates the presence or absence of ELISA reactivity of that serum sample with individual peptides indicated by colors. HCVpp neutralization by the AP33 monoclonal antibody at 1 μg/ml concentration and the effect of the 412 peptide on this neutralization was also determined and shown in the bottom left panel. significance was defined as *p≤0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.

Discussion

Peptide or small protein subunit based-immunogens as vaccine candidates could be more advantageous over the whole surface protein or attenuated virus owing to specific response of antibodies against smaller immunogens [32]. Viral surface proteins incorporate epitopes of neutralizing, non-neutralizing and interfering antibodies [33,34]. Elicitation of all kinds of antibodies by a vaccine, in particular, interfering antibodies could mask neutralizing epitopes limiting the efficacy of a vaccine [35]. Moreover, surface exposed regions of a viral surface protein exhibit higher sequence variability and antibodies targeting these epitopes are not broadly neutralizing [35]. Sequentially conserved epitopes, which are generally less exposed, can elicit antibodies that are broadly cross reactive [36,37]. In recent years, small peptides corresponding to conserved epitopes of antibodies have been considered as potential vaccine candidates [32,38]. In this study we characterized the conserved linear epitope specificity of NAbs potentially involved in spontaneous viral clearance by detecting the reactivity of the serum samples with peptide epitopes and subsequently evaluating the dependency of serum samples on particular epitope specific antibodies to neutralize HCVpp. In this regard we identified spontaneous resolvers on the basis of positive anti-HCV antibody response and negative viral RNA detection. The diagnostic anti-HCV antibody response in spontaneous resolvers and chronic patients was observed to be comparable indicating these antibodies persist for a long period of time after the clearance of the virus.

For the particular linear epitope specific antibody response, we observed that most of the CP serum samples were reactive in ELISA and to more than one peptide suggesting that antibodies of diverse linear-epitope specificities were present in majority of the chronic patients. On the other hand less than half of the SR samples showed reactivity to any of the three peptides, and most of these were reactive to a single epitope that was primarily the 432-epitope. We do want to mention that direct immobilization of linear peptides on the surface of ELISA plate has potential limitation of false negative outcome due to the conformational restriction of the immobilized peptide. Owing to this limitation, reactivity of a small proportion of antibodies might have missed in our ELISA assay. However, the comparison of the ELISA reactivity of two groups, suggest that only a proportion of spontaneous resolvers produced antibodies targeted against these linear-epitopes and those antibodies were more specific in their reactivity as compared to ones present in chronic patients. Early appearance of neutralizing antibodies directed against a narrow range of envelope epitopes has also been described previously as a key factor in spontaneous HCV clearance [39,40]. In chronic patients, an active infection phase persists for a long period of time therefore high titers of different antibodies of diverse specificities are produced. On the other hand individuals who can clear the virus at acute phase, experience active infection for a short period of time therefore contain low overall antibody titers. However, in our ELISA based analysis, specific linear epitope reactive antibodies were observed in comparable titers in the two groups (Fig 1) suggesting that these linear epitope specific antibodies possibly exist in the larger proportion of the total antibodies in spontaneous-resolvers as compared to in chronic patients, and these antibodies could have role in spontaneous clearance. It has previously been observed that the spontaneous viral clearance by NAbs at the acute phase depends on the early induction of these NAbs at higher titers as such antibodies do not appear at the acute phase of chronic infections [39,40]. Our observation of comparable titers of specific linear epitope targeted antibodies in the two groups of serum samples is in agreement with these findings.

Around half of the ELISA reactive serum samples of each group neutralized HCVpp. This suggested that in roughly half of the cases antibodies reactive to any of the three peptides were non-neutralizing and/or had been interfered by other antibodies to neutralize as several previous studies have reported the masking of neutralizing epitopes on the HCV envelope by interfering non-neutralizing antibodies [41,42]. Overall neutralizing ED50 values of the CP serum samples were much higher as compared to those of SR samples. In chronic patients due to the longer exposure several types of antibodies targeting various epitopes are produced. These epitopes include conformational as well as different linear epitopes [34,4346]. The observed higher ED50 values of the CP serum samples can be explained by the presence of a diverse set of antibodies targeting different epitopes on the virus that contribute to HCVpp neutralization.

The neutralizing activity of most of the CP sera was affected by the presence of the competing peptides that had shown reactivity in ELISA. This suggests that antibodies specific for different linear epitopes in the CP sera contributed to the HCV neutralization by these serum samples. Despite the presence of these NAbs targeted against conserved epitopes the infection persisted at chronic phase in these patients. Several previous studies have described that the appearance of broadly cross-reactive antibodies at the early acute phase is critical for the clearance of the virus and appearance of such antibodies at the later stage in chronic progressors cannot overcome the emergence of escape variants [16,39,47]. However, the details of mutations responsible for the escape of neutralization by these conserved epitope specific antibodies remains to be evaluated in the follow up investigation.

In the SR group HCV neutralizing activity of most of the neutralizing serum samples was significantly affected by the presence of competing peptides according to the ELISA reactivity suggesting HCV neutralization by most of these samples was partially or fully dependent on antibodies specific for respective linear epitope. Among these samples 75% showed their dependency primarily on the 432-epitope-targeted antibodies to neutralize the virus suggesting a potential role of this neutralizing epitope in spontaneous viral clearance. Overall, out of 49 SR serum samples included in this study, 6 (12%) showed their dependency on the 432 linear epitope specific antibodies for HCVpp neutralization while 2 and 1 of the samples respectively were dependent on the 412- and the 523-epitopes targeted antibodies. Several broadly cross-reactive antibodies targeting the 412-epitope have been identified [27]. However, no antibody targeting the 523-region as a linear epitope has been reported earlier but several antibodies specific for conformational epitopes involving residues from the 523-region have been described [48]. The E2 region encompassing aa 432–443 contains highly conserved overlapping linear epitopes and parts of conformational epitopes, and the antibodies targeting this region exhibit the broadest reactivity as compared to the ones specific for other epitopes [49,50]. Keck et al., recently reported the early acute phase appearance of NAbs that target a conformational epitope involving the aa 432–446 region of E2 in an individual who spontaneously resolved three sequential HCV infections [50]. Anne Olbrich et al., recently identified two broadly neutralizing antibodies responsible for spontaneous resolution of the infection at the acute phase, these antibodies specifically recognize a linear epitope (aa483-499) in the central front layer of the E2 glycoprotein. These studies highlight the significance of linear epitopes in general and the region encompassing aa 432–443 of E2 in spontaneous viral clearance [18]. Although, we observed possible role of three conserved linear epitopes targeted NAbs only in a small proportion of individuals, these linear epitopes, in particular the 432-epitope, represent important neutralizing epitopes for spontaneous viral clearance and further studies on structural basis of their recognition by respective antibodies will provide more information for rational vaccine design. There are multiple factors potentially contributing to the spontaneous viral clearance, however in this study we have discussed only the potential contribution of antibodies specific for linear epitopes.

Taken together, we have identified that individuals who spontaneously resolve HCV infection at the acute phase can produce antibodies specific for highly conserved linear epitopes, and those antibodies can play a primary role in the spontaneous clearance of the infection. Among these conserved linear epitopes the E2 region encompassing aa 432–443 was identified as the prominent neutralizing epitope with potential role in spontaneous viral clearance. Further study is needed to delineate the epitope-antibody recognition details using purified monoclonal antibodies as such information would enhance our understanding in rational vaccine design perspective.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Alignment of amino acid sequences of three linear epitopes from different HCV genotypes.

The alignment shows significant amino acid sequence conservation in these regions among different genotypes.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. VSV neutralization by four different human serum samples.

The data showing no viral neutralization by any of the serum samples at 10-fold dilution. Only the sample 226 showed slight activity.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Dr Charlis M. Rice at the Rockefeller University for providing Huh7.5 cells, to Dr Parizia Farci at NIAID, National Institutes of Health, USA, for providing vectors containing genes encoding HCV envelope and to AIDS Research and Reference Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, USA for providing backbone plasmid to generate HCVpp. We are also thankful to Punjab AIDS Control Program, Pakistan for providing monthly stipend to Saira Dar.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

Syed Shahzad ul Hussan, NRPU grant (20-5904/NRPU/R&D/17) from Higher Education Commission of Pakistan, https://www.hec.gov.pk/english/pages/home.aspx, Funding agency did not play any role except providing funding for the study.

References

  • 1.Petruzziello A, Marigliano S, Loquercio G, Cozzolino A, Cacciapuoti C. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: An up-date of the distribution and circulation of hepatitis C virus genotypes. World J Gastroentero. 2016; 22(34):7824–7840. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. Global hepatitis report 2017. 2017.
  • 3.Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: consider the population. J Clinic gastroenterol. 2013;47Suppl(0):S2–S6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182872f29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Takehara T, Sakamoto N, Nishiguchi S, Ikeda F, Tatsumi T, Ueno Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir with or without ribavirin in HCV-infected Japanese patients with decompensated cirrhosis: an open-label phase 3 trial. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(1):87–95. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1503-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmed OA, Kaisar HH, Badawi R, Hawash N, Samir H, Shabana SS, et al. Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir for treatment of a cohort of Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 infection. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:295–298. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S153060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Edlin BR. Access to treatment for hepatitis C virus infection: time to put patients first. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(9):e196–e201. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30005-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Millman AJ, Ntiri-Reid B, Irvin R, Kaufmann MH, Aronsohn A, Duchin JS, et al. Barriers to Treatment Access for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Case Series. Top Antivir Med. 2017;25(3):110–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lemoine M, Nayagam S, Thursz M. Viral hepatitis in resource-limited countries and access to antiviral therapies: current and future challenges. Future Virol. 2013;8(4):371–380. doi: 10.2217/fvl.13.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Henry B. DRUG PRICING & CHALLENGES TO HEPATITIS C TREATMENT ACCESS. Journal of health & biomedical law. 2018;14:265–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Echeverría N, Moratorio G, Cristina J, Moreno P. Hepatitis C virus genetic variability and evolution. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(6):831–845. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i6.831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Perales C, Quer J, Gregori J, Esteban JI, Domingo E. Resistance of Hepatitis C Virus to Inhibitors: Complexity and Clinical Implications. Viruses. 2015;7(11):5746–5766. doi: 10.3390/v7112902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wyles DL, Luetkemeyer AF. Understanding Hepatitis C Virus Drug Resistance: Clinical Implications for Current and Future Regimens. Top Antivir Med. 2017;25(3):103–109. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thomas DL, Thio CL, Martin MP, Qi Y, Ge D, O’Huigin C, et al. Genetic variation in IL28B and spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus. Nature. 2009;461(7265):798–801. doi: 10.1038/nature08463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wietzke-Braun P, Manhardt L-B, Rosenberger A, Uy A, Ramadori G, Mihm S. Spontaneous elimination of hepatitis C virus infection: a retrospective study on demographic, clinical, and serological correlates. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(31):4224–4229. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i31.4224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grebely J, Page K, Sacks-Davis R, van der Loeff MS, Rice TM, Bruneau J, et al. The effects of female sex, viral genotype, and IL28B genotype on spontaneous clearance of acute hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2014;59(1):109–120. doi: 10.1002/hep.26639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Osburn WO, Snider AE, Wells BL, Latanich R, Bailey JR, Thomas DL, et al. Clearance of hepatitis C infection is associated with the early appearance of broad neutralizing antibody responses. Hepatology. 2014;59(6):2140–2151. doi: 10.1002/hep.27013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yost SA, Wang Y, Marcotrigiano J. Hepatitis C Virus Envelope Glycoproteins: A Balancing Act of Order and Disorder. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1917–1917. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Olbrich A, Wardemann H, Böhm S, Rother K, Colpitts CC, Wrensch F, et al. Repertoire and Neutralizing Activity of Antibodies Against Hepatitis C Virus E2 Peptide in Patients With Spontaneous Resolution of Hepatitis C. J Infect Dis. 2019;220(7):1209–1218. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pestka JM, Zeisel MB, Bläser E, Schürmann P, Bartosch B, Cosset FL, et al. Rapid induction of virus-neutralizing antibodies and viral clearance in a single-source outbreak of hepatitis C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(14):6025–6030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607026104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Clayton RF, Owsianka A, Aitken J, Graham S, Bhella D, Patel AH. Analysis of Antigenicity and Topology of E2 Glycoprotein Present on Recombinant Hepatitis C Virus-Like Particles. J Virol. 2002;76(15):7672–7682. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.15.7672-7682.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Owsianka AM, Timms JM, Tarr AW, Brown RJ, Hickling TP, Szwejk A, et al. Identification of conserved residues in the E2 envelope glycoprotein of the hepatitis C virus that are critical for CD81 binding. J Virol. 2006;80(17):8695–8704. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00271-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Drummer HE, Boo I, Maerz AL, Poumbourios P. A conserved Gly436-Trp-Leu-Ala-Gly-Leu-Phe-Tyr motif in hepatitis C virus glycoprotein E2 is a determinant of CD81 binding and viral entry. J Virol. 2006;80(16):7844–7853. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00029-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tzarum N, Wilson IA, Law M. The Neutralizing Face of Hepatitis C Virus E2 Envelope Glycoprotein. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1315–1315. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sautto G, Tarr AW, Mancini N, Clementi M. Structural and antigenic definition of hepatitis C virus E2 glycoprotein epitopes targeted by monoclonal antibodies. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:450963. doi: 10.1155/2013/450963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Owsianka A, Tarr AW, Juttla VS, Lavillette D, Bartosch B, Cosset FL, et al. Monoclonal antibody AP33 defines a broadly neutralizing epitope on the hepatitis C virus E2 envelope glycoprotein. J Virol. 2005;79(17):11095–11104. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.17.11095-11104.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Broering TJ, Garrity KA, Boatright NK, Sloan SE, Sandor F, Thomas WD Jr., et al. Identification and characterization of broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies directed against the E2 envelope glycoprotein of hepatitis C virus. J Virol. 2009;83(23):12473–12482. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01138-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morin TJ, Broering TJ, Leav BA, Blair BM, Rowley KJ, Boucher EN, et al. Human monoclonal antibody HCV1 effectively prevents and treats HCV infection in chimpanzees. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(8):e1002895. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Das S, Mullick R, Kumar A, Tandon H, Bose M, Gouthamchandra K, et al. Identification of a novel epitope in the C terminus of hepatitis C virus-E2 protein that induces potent and cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies. J Gen Virol. 2017;98(5):962–976. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ksiazek TG, West CP, Rollin PE, Jahrling PB, Peters CJ. ELISA for the detection of antibodies to Ebola viruses. J Infect Dis. 1999;179Suppl 1:S192–198. doi: 10.1086/514313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Flint M, Logvinoff C, Rice CM, McKeating JA. Characterization of infectious retroviral pseudotype particles bearing hepatitis C virus glycoproteins. J Virol. 2004;78(13):6875–6882. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.13.6875-6882.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu R, Rao H, Wang J, Xie X, Jiang D, Pan X, et al. Determination of the human antibody response to the neutralization epitopes encompassing amino acids 313–327 and 432–443 of hepatitis C virus E1E2 glycoproteins. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Malonis RJ, Lai JR, Vergnolle O. Peptide-Based Vaccines: Current Progress and Future Challenges. Chem Rev. 2020;120(6):3210–3229. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Trier N, Hansen P, Houen G. Peptides, Antibodies, Peptide Antibodies and More. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24):6289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harman C, Zhong L, Ma L, Liu P, Deng L, Zhao Z, et al. A View of the E2-CD81 Interface at the Binding Site of a Neutralizing Antibody against Hepatitis C Virus. J Virol. 2015;89(1):492–501. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01661-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bankwitz D, Pietschmann T. Hepatitis C virus plays hide and seek with neutralizing antibodies. Hepatology. 2016;64(6):1840–1842. doi: 10.1002/hep.28760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tarr AW, Urbanowicz RA, Jayaraj D, Brown RJP, McKeating JA, Irving WL, et al. Naturally occurring antibodies that recognize linear epitopes in the amino terminus of the hepatitis C virus E2 protein confer noninterfering, additive neutralization. J Virol. 2012;86(5):2739–2749. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06492-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tarr AW, Owsianka AM, Timms JM, McClure CP, Brown RJ, Hickling TP, et al. Characterization of the hepatitis C virus E2 epitope defined by the broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody AP33. Hepatology. 2006;43(3):592–601. doi: 10.1002/hep.21088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Francis JN, Thaburet JF, Bonnet D, Sizer PJ, Brown CB, Georges B. Increasing cellular immunogenicity to peptide-based vaccine candidates using a fluorocarbon antigen delivery system. Vaccine. 2015;33(8):1071–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pestka JM, Zeisel MB, Blaser E, Schurmann P, Bartosch B, Cosset FL, et al. Rapid induction of virus-neutralizing antibodies and viral clearance in a single-source outbreak of hepatitis C. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(14):6025–6030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607026104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Walker MR, Leung P. Clearance of hepatitis C virus is associated with early and potent but narrowly-directed, Envelope-specific antibodies. Scie Rep. 2019;9(1):13300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49454-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang P, Wu CG, Mihalik K, Virata-Theimer ML, Yu M-yW, Alter HJ, et al. Hepatitis C virus epitope-specific neutralizing antibodies in Igs prepared from human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(20):8449–8454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703039104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang P, Zhong L, Struble EB, Watanabe H, Kachko A, Mihalik K, et al. Depletion of interfering antibodies in chronic hepatitis C patients and vaccinated chimpanzees reveals broad cross-genotype neutralizing activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(18):7537–7541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902749106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lavie M, Sarrazin S, Montserret R, Descamps V, Baumert TF, Duverlie G, et al. Identification of conserved residues in hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein E2 that modulate virus dependence on CD81 and SRB1 entry factors. J Virol. 2014;88(18):10584–10597. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01402-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chang C-C, Hsu H-J, Yen J-H, Lo S-Y, Liou J-W. A Sequence in the loop domain of hepatitis C virus E2 protein identified in silico as crucial for the selective binding to human CD81. PloS one. 2017;12(5):e0177383–e0177383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kachko A, Frey SE, Sirota L, Ray R, Wells F, Zubkova I, et al. Antibodies to an interfering epitope in hepatitis C virus E2 can mask vaccine-induced neutralizing activity. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2015;62(6):1670–1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Deng L, Ma L, Virata-Theimer ML, Zhong L, Yan H, Zhao Z, et al. Discrete conformations of epitope II on the hepatitis C virus E2 protein for antibody-mediated neutralization and nonneutralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(29):10690–10695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411317111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dowd KA, Netski DM, Wang XH, Cox AL, Ray SC. Selection pressure from neutralizing antibodies drives sequence evolution during acute infection with hepatitis C virus. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(7):2377–2386. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Law M, Maruyama T, Lewis J, Giang E, Tarr AW, Stamataki Z, et al. Broadly neutralizing antibodies protect against hepatitis C virus quasispecies challenge. Nat Med. 2008;14(1):25–27. doi: 10.1038/nm1698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Keck ZY, Xia J, Wang Y, Wang W, Krey T, Prentoe J, et al. Human monoclonal antibodies to a novel cluster of conformational epitopes on HCV E2 with resistance to neutralization escape in a genotype 2a isolate. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(4):e1002653. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Keck ZY, Pierce BG, Lau P, Lu J, Wang Y, Underwood A. Broadly neutralizing antibodies from an individual that naturally cleared multiple hepatitis C virus infections uncover molecular determinants for E2 targeting and vaccine design. PloS Pathog. 2019;15(5):e1007772. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Sripathi M Sureban

25 May 2021

PONE-D-21-08014

Characterization of epitope specificity of antibodies potentially contributing to spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Shahzad-ul-Hussan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

I commend the team for such a extensive study and is need of the hour. Please respond with comments (point-by-point) to both the reviewers concerns. Reviewer 1 has raised very important comments and is necessary to fulfill these comments.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 09 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sripathi M Sureban, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

I commend the team for such a extensive study and is need of the hour. Please respond with comments (point-by-point) to both the reviewers concerns. Reviewer 1 has raised very important comments and is necessary to fulfill these comments.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed).

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional information about the participant recruitment method and the demographic details of your participants. Please ensure you have provided sufficient details to replicate the analyses such as: a) a description of any inclusion/exclusion criteria that were applied to participant recruitment, b) a description of how participants were recruited, and c) descriptions of where participants were recruited and where the research took place.

4. Please ensure you have discussed any potential limitations of your study in the Discussion.

5. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses. For more information on PLOS ONE' expectations for statistical reporting, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting.

6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

7. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Ahsen and colleagues describe an analysis of the epitope specificity of the polyclonal antibody response in patients who spontaneously resolve hepatitis C virus infection, comparing with the antibody response in individuals who progress to chronic infection. The study addresses an important question, as the quality of the antibody response associated with protection is useful for informing vaccine design. However, I have the following concerns with the design and execution of the study:

Major points

1.The design of the study only permits interrogation of the antibody response to linear peptides. As the authors indicate in the Discussion section, it is well established that the majority of neutralizing antibodies isolated from infected humans recognise conformation-dependent epitopes. The approaches used in this study only examine reactivity to three short peptide epitopes, and as such there is the possibility of lack of interrogation of important antibodies binding to conformation-dependent epitopes in these peptide regions on the surface of the E2 protein.

2.The three epitope regions interrogated in the study are all variable to different degrees between different HCV infections. The infecting genotype of HCV influences this sequence variability. While genotype 3 infections are mentioned in the Results, there is no detailed information provided in the Methods about the genotypes of the infecting viruses, either in chronic infections, on in spontaneously resolving infections. Were all of these infections genotype 3 HCV? There also appears to be inconsistencies in the sequences of the selected sequences used for the study. For example, in peptide 412, the sequence RRQLVNTNGSWHINRR is used as the target peptide, but the sequence for genotype 3a indicated in supplementary material is QLINTNGSWHIN. It appears that the peptides were generated as consensus amino acid sequences of all 7 major genotypes of HCV for target peptides. Peptides representing the sequences of genotype 3 strains (if they are the main genotype infecting the study cohort) would be much better for this study. It should also be appreciated that some of the infected individuals will be infected with strains that differ in their amino acid sequence in these critical epitopes, which may influence the reactivity to the selected peptides.

3. Line 88: The synthesis format of the peptides is not described, and it is not clear if the peptides are linear, or branched. Given that the peptides are directly coated onto the assay plates, it is possible that the antibody binding epitopes are not accessible to the antibodies present in the patient samples in this assay format. The authors must comment on the format of the assays used for these analyses. There is the potential for Type II error in the data if the peptides were linear in nature, rather than branched.

4. Line 93: antibody AP33 is indicated to be a positive control for these assays. However, AP33 is a mouse monoclonal antibody, rather than a human antibody, and as such the assay described would not work with the indicated secondary antibody. Did the authors use a humanised version of AP33? If so, this information must be provided, with an appropriate citation.

5. Line 107: The authors should provide information on the strain used for the HCV E1/E2 envelope glycoprotein expression construct. This is extremely important; it is not clear if the neutralization assays were performed with a genotype-matched construct, or if the sequence of the E1/E2 construct matched the amino acid sequence of the peptides used in the ELISA assays.

6. The peptides used in these assays may adopt different conformations depending on the assay format. There is extensive evidence that the peptide representing epitope 412 adopts different conformational configurations, and it is highly likely that in the ELISA format used the peptide conformations will be constrained, while the soluble peptide used for competition assays may be able to adopt different conformations. The authors should comment on this potential issue comparing datasets.

7. Figure 1: the authors should present the ELISA binding data from the uninfected 'healthy' controls in this as an additional panel for each peptide. It is not appropriate for the background cut-off to be set at the mean value of reactivity of six healthy control sera. It would be more appropriate to set the cut-off value at either twice the mean of the negative controls, or mean of controls +2x the standard deviation (if the data fit a Gaussian distribution). With the cut-off values set as presented, many of the ‘positive’ results are likely to be similar to those from the control dataset.

8. Figure 4: the authors describe the use of VSV-G pseudotyped viruses as a control. They should present the data demonstrating that neutralization by serum samples was specific to HCV. Also, healthy, HCV-negative control sera should also be included in the datasets describing neutralization, to demonstrate that the observed neutralization was due to anti-HCV antibodies.

9. Figure 5: The authors should include monoclonal neutralizing antibodies recognising peptides 412 and 434 in these assays to demonstrate that the consensus peptides have the potential to inhibit specific neutralization in each case. I appreciate that neutralizing mAbs recognising peptide 524 may not be available. Even if a mAb for peptide 434 is unavailable, they could perform this experiment for the combination of mAb AP33 and peptide 412.

Minor points

‘Self-resolvers’ should be more accurately referred to as ‘spontaneous resolvers’

Lines 166-171: It is not clear why the figure legend for Figure 1 is presented here.

Lines 187-188: it is not clear why the figure legend for Figure 2 is presented here.

Lines 208-214: it is not clear why the figure legend for Figure 3 is presented here.

Lines 226-232: it is not clear why the figure legend for Figure 4 is presented here.

Figure 4: The third panel on the first row indicates that neutralization is tending to plateau at ~65% neutralization, and at the greatest dilution is trending to a minimum neutralization of ~15%. These data make no biological sense, and are likely to be artefacts of the way the data has been analysed using Graphpad Prism.

Figure 4: the X axis on all panels is labelled as ‘log of serum dilution’, but no logarithmic base is indicated. Presumably they are base 10, but this needs to be indicated.

Line 367: ‘Zhen-Young K et al’ should read ‘Keck et al’

Reviewer #2: This manuscript has the potential to be accepted, but there are a few key problems that need to be explained or rectified before we can move forward and take constructive action. Methods and discussion requires improvement.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: REVIEWER COMMENTS.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 27;16(8):e0256816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256816.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


2 Jul 2021

Thanks for the review process, we are submitting the revised version which has been improved according the advice of the reviewers. Early decision would be highly appreciated

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Sripathi M Sureban

23 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-08014R1

Characterization of linear epitope specificity of antibodies potentially contributing to spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Shahzad-ul-Hussan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: The manuscript has been extensively improved from its initial version. Reviewer 2 has accepted the manuscript, however, Reviewer 1 has some minor concerns that need to be clarified before considering to accept the manuscript. Please edit and provided point-to-point response to the questions raised.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 06 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sripathi M Sureban, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The manuscript has been extensively improved from its initial version. Reviewer 2 has accepted the manuscript, however, Reviewer 1 has some minor concerns that need to be clarified before considering to accept the manuscript. Please edit and provided point-to-point response to the questions raised.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this resubmission the authors have made significant improvements to the quality of the manuscript. This has addressed many of my original concerns, providing additional data to support their conclusions. I have the following comments that need to be addressed:

1. I thank the authors for the rebuttal to my original comment about the format of the ELISA assay and the possibility for false negative results. We and others found that linear peptides derived from HCV E2 directly coated to plastic surfaces were non-reactive for some patient serum samples, but that when the same linear peptides were captured to an ELISA plate using a terminal tag, sero-reactivity could be demonstrated. An alternative solution to this issue is to use branching synthesis when making the peptides to provide additional epitope accessibility (there is no implication that the structure on the surface of E2 is branched) (see Tarr et al, Hepatology 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21088; Tarr et al, Journal of General Virology https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.83065-0). The authors should mention this potential limitation in their assay format in the Discussion section. The authors cite previous studies that use this method, but it is possible that they also suffer from this limitation.

2. Line 132: the authors have provided the genotype of the strain used for pseudotype generation. However, the neutralization sensitivity of different genotype 1a strains varies widely (Wasilewski, Ray & Bailey, 2016 10.1099/jgv.0.000608). The authors should provide the strain designation of the E1/E2 construct used for these experiments. Use of the H77 strain for these types of experiments is common, and it is widely appreciated that this represents a ‘neutralization-sensitive’ phenotype, that might not represent the neutralization sensitivity of other genotype 1a strains. An indication of the strain would allow the reader to make their own interpretation of the data.

3. Line 293: reference to ‘Table 2’ should be to Table 3.

4. Lines 372-373: It is plausible that the lack of neutralizing response in spontaneous resolvers could be due to the waning antibody response following lack of antigenic stimulation of B cells in these individuals in the period following clearance of the virus. Without a previous RNA-positive test, it is impossible to predict when the spontaneous resolution occurred in these individuals. I appreciate that these patients were identified as being antibody positive in clinical assays, but it would be useful to describe in the Discussion if the signals in these assays were comparable to that achieved in chronic infections, or if the antibody binding signals were low.

5. Figure S1: The authors should revise this figure to represent the most frequent sequences occurring in each genotype (or subgenotype). For instance, for genotype 2b viruses, for sequences deposited on Genbank the sequence for the region 412-423 is rarely ‘QLVNTNGSWHIN’, and is more commonly ‘QLINTNGSWHIN’ of ‘SLINTNGSWHIN’. This impacts on the statement on Line 164 that the selected peptide represented a consensus of all major genotypes of HCV

6. The statistical analysis for Figure 5 used repeated T tests, but there is no indication that a correction for repeated measures was performed. A one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction may be more appropriate where multiple comparisons are performed.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Dr. R.PARTHIBAN

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 27;16(8):e0256816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256816.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


30 Jul 2021

Thanks for the review process to improve the manuscript, we are submitting the revised version which has been revised in light of the reviewers suggestions. I hope it will be accepted now

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Sripathi M Sureban

17 Aug 2021

Characterization of linear epitope specificity of antibodies potentially contributing to spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus

PONE-D-21-08014R2

Dear Dr. Shahzad-ul-Hussan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Sripathi M Sureban, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The manuscript is extensively modified and I congratulate the authors on the good work and I have recommended to accept for publications. Good luck with future projects!

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for addressing my additional comments on the revised manuscript. I believe the study has been thoroughly improved by the additional data and revisions to the manuscript.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Sripathi M Sureban

19 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-08014R2

Characterization of linear epitope specificity of antibodies potentially contributing to spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus

Dear Dr. Shahzad-ul-Hussan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Sripathi M Sureban

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Alignment of amino acid sequences of three linear epitopes from different HCV genotypes.

    The alignment shows significant amino acid sequence conservation in these regions among different genotypes.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. VSV neutralization by four different human serum samples.

    The data showing no viral neutralization by any of the serum samples at 10-fold dilution. Only the sample 226 showed slight activity.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: REVIEWER COMMENTS.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES