Skip to main content
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons logoLink to JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3):e2021.00043. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00043

Effect of Lowest Postoperative Pre-albumin on Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy

Anastasia Jermihov 1,9,10, Athanasios Tsalatsanis 2,9,10, Shruti Kulkarni 3,9,10, Frank O Velez 4,9,10, Carla C Moodie 5,9,10, Joseph R Garrett 6,9,10, Jacques-Pierre Fontaine 9,10, Eric M Toloza 7,8,9,10,
PMCID: PMC8397293  PMID: 34483640

Abstract

Objective:

Lower pre-albumin levels have been associated with increased rates of post-surgical complications, prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS), and death. This study aims to investigate the effect of postoperative pre-albumin levels on perioperative and long-term outcomes following robotic-assisted video thoracoscopic (RAVT) pulmonary lobectomy.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 459 consecutive patients who underwent RAVT pulmonary lobectomy by one surgeon for known or suspected lung cancer. The lowest pre-albumin values during the postoperative hospital stay were recorded. Twenty-three patients with no pre-albumin levels available were excluded from analysis. Patients were grouped as having normal (≥ 15 mg/dL) versus low (< 15mg/dL) pre-albumin. Outcomes and demographics were compared between groups using Pearson χ2, Student’s t, or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Univariate and multivariate generalized linear regression, logistic regression, or Cox proportional hazard ratio models were used to assess the association between outcomes and variables of interest. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate and depict survival probabilities for each group.

Results:

Our study population comprised 436 patients. Lowest postoperative pre-albumin below 15 mg/dL was associated with more postoperative complications (44.2% vs 24.9%, p < 0.001), longer chest tube duration (6.9 vs 4.6 days, p = 0.001), and longer LOS (7.0 vs. 4.4 days, p < 0.001). In survival analysis, lowest perioperative pre-albumin levels were found to correlate with decreased 1 year (p = 0.012), 3-year (p = 0.001), and 5-year survival (p = 0.001).

Conclusion:

Lower pre-albumin levels postoperatively are associated with more postoperative complications, longer chest tube duration and LOS, and decreased overall survival following robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.

Keywords: Perioperative outcomes, Robotic surgery, Pulmonary lobectomy, Nutritional status

INTRODUCTION

Malnutrition is common amongst lung cancer patients1–3 and is associated with increased complications and mortality after surgery.1,46 Nutritional impairment has been identified as a predictor for increased postoperative complications, increased need for postoperative ventilator support, and increased 90-day and 5-year mortality following surgery for lung cancer.1,4,5

The influences of nutritional status in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lung cancer has not been well documented. Of the MIS techniques used for pulmonary lobectomy, robotic-assisted video-thoracoscopic (RAVT) surgery is a newer modality associated with decreased postoperative complications, decreased hospital length of stay (LOS), and increased surgical precision.79 As RAVT surgery is a newer modality with studies demonstrating improved outcomes compared to other surgical approaches, understanding the role of malnutrition in this surgical population is an important part of improving outcomes for surgical lung cancer patients.

Although historically albumin has often been used as a marker for nutritional status, pre-albumin has gained favor due to its rapid half-life of two days compared to albumin’s half-life of 20 days.10 Pre-albumin is also less affected by liver function and hydration status than albumin.10 In a 1995 consensus statement, a panel recommended that all patients with pre-albumin below 15 mg per dL receive a consultation from the hospital’s nutritional team.11 Low pre-operative pre-albumin levels have been associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications, and both low preoperative and postoperative pre-albumin levels have been associated with earlier lung cancer recurrence following resection.12,13

The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of nutritional status, as measured by postoperative pre-albumin levels, on perioperative outcomes following RAVT pulmonary lobectomy. Outcomes studies include operative skin-to-skin time, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative complications, hospital LOS), chest tube duration, in-hospital mortality, and survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy by one surgeon between September 1, 2010 through August 31, 2018 at a single institution. The number of procedures performed by the surgeon during the specified time period determined the sample size of our study. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age and had undergone elective RAVT lobectomy for clinically diagnosed or suspected lung cancer, with or without neo-adjuvant therapy.

As only a very limited number of patients had pre-operative pre-albumin values recorded in the charts, postoperative pre-albumin values were assessed instead. We tabulated the first postoperative pre-albumin level recorded within 48 hours of surgery, the lowest postoperative pre-albumin level recorded during the entire inpatient stay, and the postoperative pre-albumin value recorded just prior to discharge from this hospital. This paper focuses on the lowest pre-albumin level recorded during the entire postoperative inpatient stay, ranging from within 48 hours after surgery until discharge from the hospital, and its effects on various outcomes. We divided patients into high and low pre-albumin groups based on a cut-off level of 15 mg/dL, which was determined based on the Nutritional Care Consensus Group recommendation that patients with a pre-albumin level below 15 mg/dL receive nutritional consultation.11

In addition to the independent variable of nutritional status as measured by pre-albumin, other variables were analyzed including age, gender, body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of predicted (FEV1%) at surgery. Past medical history and smoking history were also obtained from the pre-operative history and physical examination. We defined current smokers as smokers who either still smoked or quit within 3 months of the surgical date. Former smokers include those patients who had quit smoking for at least 3 months prior to surgery. Perioperative outcomes studied include operative skin-to-skin time, EBL, postoperative complications, chest tube duration, hospital LOS, and in-hospital mortality, as well as survival at 1,3, and 5 years.

Differences in demographics between pre-albumin groups were assessed by independent sample t test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables or by Pearson χ-Squared test for dichotomous variables. Univariate and multivariable analyses for hospital LOS and chest tube duration was performed with generalized linear (γ - log link) regression models (GLM), and for postoperative complications with logistic regression model. The difference in survival between the pre-albumin groups was assessed using log rank test. Probabilities of survival were calculated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable analysis for survival was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model and summarized as hazard ratios along with 95% confidence interval (CI). The statistical significance was set at 5% for all comparisons. All multivariable analyses were initially built by including all variables that were found statistically significant in a univariate analysis. The final multivariable models were selected by allowing variables with P < 0.1 to remain in the models.

RESULTS

Demographics and Pre-Operative Comorbidities

Of 459 patients who underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy during the study period, we identified 436 patients who met the inclusion criteria, of which there were 183 (42%) men and 253 (58%) women (Table 1). The mean age at surgery was 67.5 years. There were 259 patients (59.3%) with a lowest postoperative pre-albumin level below 15 mg/dL (poor nutrition) and 177 patients (40.7%) with a lowest postoperative pre-albumin level at or above 15 mg/dL (adequate nutrition).

Table 1.

Patient Demographics

Patient Characteristics Total N = 436 Lowest Pre-albumin < 15 mg/dL N = 259 Lowest Pre-albumin ≥ 15 mg/dL N = 177 p-Value
Age*, yr 67.5 ± 0.5 68.5 ± 0.6 66.2 ± 0.8 0.018
BMI*, kg/m2 28.0 ± 0.3 27.6 ± 0.4 28.6 ± 0.4 0.077
BSA*, m2 1.89 ± 0.01 1.87 ± 0.02 1.92 ± 0.02 0.057
FEV1%* 87.8 ± 0.9 85.9 ± 1.3 90.5 ± 1.3 0.012
Gender, n (%) 0.799
Male 183 (42%) 110 (42.5%) 73 (41.2%)
Female 253 (58%) 149 (57.5%) 104 (58.8%)

*Mean ± standard error of mean (range).

BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; FEV1%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as percent of predicted.

The demographic that significantly differed between nutritional status groups was age (P = .018), with poor-nutrition patients being older compared to adequate-nutrition patients at the time of surgery (Table 1). Patients with poor nutrition also had decreased FEV1% (P = .012) compared to patients with adequate nutrition (Table 1). Among pre-operative comorbidities, patients in the poor-nutrition group had a significantly higher rate of coronary artery disease (CAD) or myocardial infarction (MI) (20.1% vs 11.9%, P = .024), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) (5.8% vs 1.1%, P = .013), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (23.2% vs 14.1%, P = .019), chronic anemia (3.9% vs 0.6%, P = .031), and pancreatitis (2.3% vs 0%, P = .041) (Table 2). Additionally, patients with postoperative pre-albumin levels below 15 mg/dL had significantly larger tumors on average compared to patients whose postoperative pre-albumin levels remained at or above 15 mg/dL (3.6 cm vs 2.8 cm, P < .001) (Table 3). There were no significant differences in tumor pathology or pathological stage between groups.

Table 2.

Smoking Status and Pre-operative Co-morbidities

Preoperative Comorbidities Total N = 436 Lowest Pre-albumin < 15 mg/dL N = 259 Lowest Pre-albumin ≥ 15 mg/dL N = 177 p-Value
Smoking status: Current 139 (31.9%) 86 (33.2%) 53 (29.9%) 0.300
Former 216 (49.5%) 131 (50.6%) 85 (48.0%)
Never 81 (18.6%) 42 (16.2%) 39 (22.0%)
COPD 92 (21.1%) 62 (23.9%) 30 (16.9%) 0.079
Asthma 32 (7.3%) 21 (8.1%) 11 (6.2%) 0.457
Heart valvular disease or cardiomyopathy 30 (6.9%) 20 (7.7%) 10 (5.6%) 0.401
CAD or MI 73 (16.7%) 52 (20.1%) 21 (11.9%) 0.024
CVA 17 (3.9%) 15 (5.8%) 2 (1.1%) 0.013
Carotid stenosis 22 (5%) 14 (5.4%) 8 (4.5%) 0.678
Congestive heart failure 9 (2.1%) 3 (1.2%) 6 (3.4%) 0.108
Obstructive sleep apnea 31 (7.1%) 21 (8.1%) 10 (5.6%) 0.327
Pulmonary embolism 18 (4.2%) 9 (3.5%) 9 (5.1%) 0.407
Prior pneumonia 37 (8.5%) 24 (9.3%) 13 (7.3%) 0.479
Pulmonary fibrosis 5 (1.1%) 5 (1.9%) 0 (0.0%) 0.063
Cirrhosis or liver failure 2 (0.5%) 1 (0.4%) 1 (0.6%) 0.786
Diabetes mellitus 71 (16.3%) 41 (15.8%) 30 (16.9%) 0.756
GERD 85 (19.5%) 60 (23.2%) 25 (14.1%) 0.019
Kidney disease 16 (3.7%) 10 (3.9%) 6 (3.4%) 0.797
Chronic anemia 11 (2.5%) 10 (3.9%) 1 (0.6%) 0.031
Coagulation disorders, hemophilia, or thrombocytopenia 7 (1.6%) 5 (1.9%) 2 (1.1%) 0.514
Previous cancers 189 (43.3%) 106 (40.9%) 83 (46.9%) 0.217
Hypertension 245 (56.2%) 150 (57.9%) 95 (53.7%) 0.381
Hyperlipidemia 212 (48.6%) 129 (49.8%) 83 (46.9%) 0.550
Atrial fibrillation 31 (7.1%) 15 (5.8%) 16 (9.0%) 0.195
Other arrhythmias 22 (5%) 14 (5.4%) 8 (4.5%) 0.678
Peripheral vascular disease 17 (3.9%) 11 (4.2%) 6 (3.4%) 0.650
Pancreatitis 6 (1.4%) 6 (2.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0.041

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; MI, myocardial infarction; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Table 3.

Tumor Characteristics

Tumor Characteristics Total Lowest Pre-albumin < 15 mg/dL Lowest Pre-albumin ≥ 15 mg/dL p-Value
Tumor sizea, cm N = 433
3.26 ± 0.1 (0.2–14.2)
N = 258
3.6 ± 0.1 (0.2–14.2)
N = 175
2.8 ± 0.1 (0.8–9.0)
<0.001
Pathology, n (%) N = 435 N = 258 N = 177 0.594
Primary lung cancer 402 (92.2%) 241 (93.1%) 161 (91%)
Pulmonary metastasis 30 (6.9%) 15 (5.8%) 15 (8.5%)
Other pathologyb 3 (0.7%) 2 (0.8%) 1 (0.6%)
Pathologic stage for primary lung cancers, n (%) N = 400 N = 240 N = 160 0.261
Stage IA 168 (42.0%) 93 (38.8%) 75 (46.9%)
Stage IB 50 (12.5%) 27 (11.4%) 23 (14.4%)
Stage IIA 56 (14.0%) 33 (13.8%) 23 (14.4%)
Stage IIB 27 (6.8%) 21 (8.8%) 6 (3.8%)
Stage IIIA 82 (20.5%) 54 (22.5%) 28 (17.5%)
Stage IIIB 6 (1.5%) 5 (2.1%) 1 (0.6%)
Stage IV 11 (2.8%) 7 (2.9%) 4 (2.5%)

aMean ± standard error of mean (range)

bBenign or lymphoma.

Intraoperative and Perioperative Outcomes

There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications between groups (Table 4). Patients with lowest postoperative pre-albumin levels below 15 mg/dL experienced a significantly greater rate of postoperative complications (44.2% vs 24.9%; P < .001) compared to patients with lowest postoperative pre-albumin at or above 15 mg/dL (Table 5). There was also a significantly higher EBL in the poor-nutrition group (200 mL vs 150 mL; P < .001) (Table 6). The poor-nutrition group experienced significantly longer median skin-to-skin duration (190 min vs 165 min, P < .001), chest tube duration (4 days vs 3 days, P = .001), and hospital LOS (5 days vs 3 days, P < .001) (Table 6). Among postoperative complications, the poor-nutrition group experienced a significantly greater number of prolonged air leaks > 5 days (24% vs. 140.7%, P = .017) and ≥ 7 days (21.3% vs 13.0%, P = .026), pneumonias (100.1% vs 0.6%, P < .001), chyle leaks (50.8% vs 10.7%, P = .034), and mucous plug requiring intervention (6.2% vs 0.6%, P = .003) (Table 5).

Table 4.

Intra-operative Complications

Complication Variable Total N = 435 Lowest Pre-albumin < 15 mg/dL N = 258 Lowest Pre-albumin ≥ 15 mg/dL N = 177 p-Value
Overall Intraoperative Complications 27 (6.2%) 20 (7.8%) 7 (4.0%) 0.107
 Bleeding (pulmonary artery) 12 (2.8%) 10 (3.9%) 2 (1.1%) 0.086
 Bleeding (pulmonary vein) 5 (1.1%) 3 (1.2%) 2 (1.1%) 0.975
 Bleeding (other) 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.407
 Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury 3 (0.7%) 3 (1.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0.150
 Phrenic nerve injury 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.6%) 0.227
 Bronchial injury 5 (1.1%) 3 (1.2%) 2 (1.1%) 0.975
 Diaphragm injury 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.407

Table 5.

Postoperative Complications

Complications Total N = 435 Lowest Pre-albumin < 15 mg/dL N = 258 Lowest Pre-albumin ≥ 15 mg/dL N = 177 p-Value
Overall postoperative complications 158 (36.3%) 114 (44.2%) 44 (24.9%) <0.001
Pulmonary-related complications
 Prolonged air leak ≥ 5 days 88 (20.2%) 62 (24.0%) 26 (14.7%) 0.017
 Prolong air leak >7 days w/wo subcutaneous emphysema 78 (17.9%) 55 (21.3%) 23 (13.0%) 0.026
 Pneumonia 27 (6.2%) 26 (10.1%) 1 (0.6%) 0.000
 Chyle leak 18 (4.1%) 15 (5.8%) 3 (1.7%) 0.034
 Mucous plug requiring intervention 17 (3.9%) 16 (6.2%) 1 (0.6%) 0.003
 Respiratory failure 8 (1.8%) 7 (2.7%) 1 (0.6%) 0.101
 Hypoxia 5 (1.1%) 4 (1.6%) 1 (0.6%) 0.344
 Pneumothorax after chest tube removal requiring intervention 7 (1.6%) 4 (1.6%) 3 (1.7%) 0.906
 Aspiration 6 (1.4%) 4 (1.6%) 2 (1.1%) 0.712
 Hemothorax 4 (0.9%) 3 (1.2%) 1 (0.6%) 0.521
 Pulmonary embolism 2 (0.5%) 2 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0.240
Cardiovascular complications
 Atrial fibrillation 47 (10.8%) 32 (12.4%) 15 (8.5%) 0.195
 Other arrythmia requiring intervention 5 (1.1%) 3 (1.2%) 2 (1.1%) 0.975
 Shock/multiorgan system failure 5 (1.1%) 4 (1.6%) 1 (0.6%) 0.344
 Cardiopulmonary arrest 3 (0.7%) 3 (1.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0.150
 Myocardial infarction 2 (0.5%) 2 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0.240
 Cerebrovascular accident 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.407

Table 6.

Perioperative Outcomes

Lowest Pre-albumin
Outcomes < 15 mg/dL N = 258 ≥ 15 mg/dL N = 177 p-value
Skin-to-Skin Duration, min; median (IQR) 190 (153–241) 165 (141–203) <0.001
EBL, mL; median (IQR) 200 (100–350) 150 (50–237) <0.001
Postop Complications, n (%) 114 (44.2%) 44 (24.9%) <0.001
Chest tube duration, days; median (IQR) 4 (3–7) 3 (2–4) 0.001
LOS, days; median (IQR) 5 (4–8) 3 (3–5) <0.001
In-Hospital Mortality, n (%) 4 (1.6%) 2 (1.1%) 0.712

IQR, interquartile range; EBL, estimated blood loss; Postop, postoperative; LOS, length of stay.

Univariate Analyses for Hospital Length of Stay, Chest Tube Duration, and Postoperative Complications

Univariate GLM analyses showed that pre-albumin, age, size of tumor, gender, and pre-operative CVA, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, chronic anemia, and FEV1% were significant predictors for length of stay (Table 7). The median hospital LOS for patients with lowest pre-albumin lower than 15 mg/dL was 1.6 days longer than patients with lowest pre-albumin above 15 mg/dL. Similarly, univariate GLM analyses showed that pre-albumin, gender, BMI, and pre-operative CVA, other arrhythmias, COPD, asthma, pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, GERD, chronic anemia, and FEV1% were significant predictors of chest tube duration (Table 8). The median chest tube duration for patients with lowest pre-albumin lower than 15 mg/dL was 1.5 days longer than that for patients with lowest pre-albumin equal to or above 15 mg/dL.

Table 7.

Univariate Generalized Linear Model Analysis for Hospital Length of Stay

95% Wald CI Exp (b)
Variables b S.E. (b) Exp (b) Lower Upper p-value
Pre-albumin <15mg/dL 0.477 0.0566 1.611 1.442 1.800 <0.001
Age 0.008 0.0029 1.008 1.003 1.014 0.004
BSA −0.054 0.1167 0.947 0.754 1.190 0.641
BMI −0.006 0.0049 0.994 0.985 1.004 0.233
Preop CVA 0.438 0.1469 1.55 1.162 2.067 0.003
Preop CAD or previous MI 0.112 0.0777 1.119 0.961 1.302 0.15
Preop Heart Valvular Disease or Cardiomyopathy 0.189 0.1161 1.208 0.962 1.516 0.104
Preop Atrial Fibrillation 0.159 0.1144 1.172 0.936 1.467 0.165
Preop Other Arrhythmias 0.119 0.1346 1.126 0.865 1.465 0.379
Preop Carotid Stenosis 0.227 0.1315 1.255 0.969 1.624 0.084
Preop CHF −0.130 0.2075 0.878 0.585 1.319 0.532
Preop Hypertension 0.142 0.0577 1.153 1.029 1.290 0.014
Preop Hyperlipidemia −0.010 0.0576 0.99 0.885 1.108 0.868
Preop Peripheral Vascular Disease −0.047 0.1482 0.954 0.713 1.275 0.75
Preop COPD 0.300 0.0697 1.35 1.177 1.547 <0.001
Preop Obstructive Sleep Apnea −0.014 0.1099 0.986 0.795 1.223 0.897
Preop Asthma −0.229 0.111 0.795 0.640 0.989 0.039
Preop Pneumonia 0.175 0.1017 1.191 0.976 1.455 0.085
Preop Pulmonary Fibrosis −0.256 0.277 0.774 0.450 1.331 0.354
Preop PE or DVT 0.174 0.1442 1.19 0.897 1.578 0.229
Preop Cirrhosis or Liver Failure −0.277 0.4367 0.758 0.322 1.784 0.526
Preop Pancreatitis 0.479 0.2523 1.614 0.985 2.649 0.058
Preop GERD 0.063 0.073 1.065 0.923 1.229 0.388
Preop Kidney Disease 0.344 0.1561 1.411 1.040 1.916 0.027
Preop Chronic Anemia −0.473 0.1871 0.623 0.432 0.899 0.011
Preop Coagulation, Hemophilia, or Thrombocytopenia −0.233 0.2346 0.792 0.501 1.255 0.321
Preop Diabetes Mellitus 0.077 0.0765 1.08 0.930 1.255 0.313
Previous Cancers −0.042 0.058 0.959 0.856 1.075 0.467
Size of tumor (cm) 0.031 0.0151 1.031 1.002 1.063 0.038
Female −0.159 0.0577 0.853 0.762 0.956 0.006
Preop FEV1% −0.006 0.0014 0.994 0.991 0.997 <0.001

b, unstandardized model coefficient; S.E. (b), standard error for model coefficient “b”; Exp (b), exponential of model coefficient “b”; CI, confidence interval; BSA, body surface area; BMI, body mass index; Preop, preoperative; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; CAD/MI, coronary artery disease/myocardial infarction; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PE, pulmonary embolus; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; FEV1%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of predicted.

Table 8.

Univariate Generalized Linear Model Analysis for Chest Tube Duration

95% Wald CI Exp (b)
Variables b S.E. (b) Exp (b) Lower Upper p-value
Pre-albumin < 15mg/dL 0.375 0.0725 1.455 1.262 1.677 <0.001
Age 0.006 0.0038 1.006 0.998 1.013 0.133
BSA −0.050 0.1465 0.951 0.714 1.267 0.734
BMI −0.019 0.0061 0.981 0.969 0.993 0.002
Preop CVA 0.367 0.1825 1.443 1.010 2.065 0.044
Preop CAD or previous MI 0.130 0.096 1.139 0.944 1.374 0.175
Preop Heart Valvular Disease or Cardiomyopathy 0.013 0.1438 1.013 0.764 1.343 0.929
Preop Atrial Fibrillation 0.152 0.1415 1.164 0.882 1.536 0.284
Preop Other Arrhythmias 0.335 0.1657 1.398 1.011 1.935 0.043
Preop Carotid Stenosis 0.038 0.1629 1.039 0.755 1.429 0.816
Preop CHF −0.070 0.2563 0.932 0.564 1.542 0.785
Preop Hypertension 0.117 0.0715 1.124 0.976 1.293 0.103
Preop Hyperlipidemia 0.024 0.0711 1.024 0.890 1.177 0.741
Preop Peripheral Vascular Disease −0.137 0.183 0.872 0.610 1.249 0.455
Preop COPD 0.376 0.0861 1.456 1.230 1.725 <0.001
Preop Obstructive Sleep Apnea 0.015 0.1357 1.015 0.778 1.324 0.912
Preop Asthma −0.294 0.137 0.745 0.569 0.974 0.032
Preop Pneumonia 0.264 0.1254 1.302 1.019 1.665 0.035
Preop Pulmonary Fibrosis −0.894 0.3407 0.409 0.210 0.798 0.009
Preop PE or DVT −0.026 0.1784 0.974 0.687 1.381 0.882
Preop Cirrhosis or Liver Failure −0.667 0.5389 0.513 0.179 1.477 0.216
Preop Pancreatitis 0.750 0.3107 2.117 1.151 3.892 0.016
Preop GERD* 0.282 0.0894 1.326 1.112 1.579 0.002
Preop Kidney Disease 0.093 0.1937 1.097 0.751 1.603 0.632
Preop Chronic Anemia −0.675 0.2309 0.509 0.323 0.799 0.003
Preop Coagulation, Hemophilias, or Thrombocytopenia −0.538 0.2892 0.584 0.332 1.030 0.063
Preop Diabetes Mellitus 0.058 0.0946 1.06 0.880 1.275 0.541
Previous Cancers −0.002 0.0717 0.998 0.868 1.149 0.98
Size of tumor (cm) 0.018 0.0183 1.018 0.982 1.055 0.333
Female −0.307 0.0706 0.736 0.640 0.845 <0.001
Preop FEV1% −0.008 0.0017 0.992 0.989 0.996 <0.001

b, unstandardized model coefficient; S.E. (b), standard error for model coefficient “b”; Exp (b), exponential of model coefficient “b”; CI, confidence interval; BSA, body surface area; BMI, body mass index; Preop, preoperative; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; CAD/MI, coronary artery disease/myocardial infarction; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PE, pulmonary embolus; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; FEV1%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of predicted.

Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that pre-albumin, age, female gender, and pre-operative other arrhythmias, hypertension, COPD, GERD, and chronic anemia were significant predictors of postoperative complications (Table 9). Patients with lowest pre-albumin less than 15 mg/dL had a 58% higher chance than patients with lowest pre-albumin greater than or equal to 15 mg/dL to develop postoperative complications. Variables found significant in univariate analyses were considered for inclusion in the multivariable models as control variables.

Table 9.

Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis for Postoperative Complications

Variables B S.E. Wald p-Value OR 95% CI for OR
Lower Upper
Constant −0.234 0.125 3.473 0.062 0.792 - -
Pre-albumin < 15mg/dL −0.873 0.214 16.564 <0.001 0.418 0.275 0.636
Age 0.026 0.010 5.960 0.015 1.026 1.005 1.047
BSA 0.597 0.387 2.380 0.123 1.817 0.851 3.881
BMI 0.000 0.017 0.000 0.998 1.000 0.968 1.033
Preop Cerebrovascular Accident 0.589 0.482 1.496 0.221 1.803 0.701 4.634
Preop CAD or MI 0.394 0.256 2.365 0.124 1.483 0.898 2.450
Preop Heart Valvular Disease or Cardiomyopathy 0.023 0.392 0.003 0.953 1.023 0.475 2.207
Preop Atrial Fibrillation 0.682 0.373 3.331 0.068 1.977 0.951 4.110
Preop Other Arrhythmias 0.986 0.445 4.910 0.027 2.681 1.121 6.415
Preop Carotid Stenosis −0.064 0.449 0.020 0.887 0.938 0.389 2.262
Preop Congestive Heart Failure −0.697 0.808 0.744 0.388 0.498 0.102 2.427
Preop Hypertension 0.520 0.200 6.770 0.009 1.682 1.137 2.489
Preop Hyperlipidemia 0.254 0.195 1.700 0.192 1.289 0.880 1.888
Preop Peripheral Vascular Disease −0.402 0.535 0.564 0.453 0.669 0.234 1.910
Preop COPD 0.701 0.234 9.003 0.003 2.016 1.275 3.187
Preop Obstructive Sleep Apnea 0.359 0.360 0.997 0.318 1.433 0.707 2.901
Preop Asthma 0.148 0.370 0.160 0.689 1.160 0.561 2.397
Preop Pneumonia 0.404 0.334 1.466 0.226 1.498 0.779 2.882
Preop Pulmonary Fibrosis −0.826 1.122 0.541 0.462 0.438 0.049 3.950
Preop Pulmonary Embolus or DVT 0.484 0.470 1.059 0.303 1.622 0.646 4.077
Preop Cirrhosis or Liver Failure 0.571 1.418 0.162 0.687 1.770 0.110 28.479
Preop Pancreatitis 1.279 0.872 2.153 0.142 3.593 0.651 19.828
Preop GERD 0.598 0.240 6.205 0.013 1.819 1.136 2.912
Preop Kidney Disease 0.590 0.510 1.339 0.247 1.804 0.664 4.899
Preop Chronic Anemia −1.763 1.053 2.801 0.094 0.172 0.022 1.352
Preop Coagulation, Hemophilias, or Thrombocytopenia 0.285 0.770 0.137 0.711 1.330 0.294 6.015
Preop Diabetes Mellitus 0.377 0.252 2.228 0.136 1.458 0.889 2.391
Previous Cancers 0.040 0.196 0.041 0.840 1.040 0.709 1.527
Size of tumor (cm) 0.078 0.049 2.536 0.111 1.081 0.982 1.189
Female 0.698 0.197 12.501 <0.001 2.009 1.365 2.958

B, unstandardized regression weight; S.E, standard error for “b”; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Preop, pre-operative; BSA, body surface area; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; MI, myocardial infarction; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary lung disease; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Multivariable Analyses for Length of Stay, Chest Tube Duration, and Postoperative Complications

In multivariable analyses, pre-operative COPD was significantly and independently predictive of increased hospital LOS, increased chest tube duration, and increased postoperative complications. Pre-operative GERD and gender both significantly predicted longer chest tube duration and increased postoperative complications. Pre-operative arrhythmias other than atrial fibrillation (AF) were found to be significantly predictive of postoperative complications, while pre-operative chronic anemia was significantly predictive of decreased postoperative complications. Pre-operative pancreatitis was significantly predictive for longer chest tube duration (Tables 1012).

Table 10.

Multivariable Generalized Linear Model Analysis for Hospital Length of Stay

95% Wald CI Exp (b)
Variables b S.E. (b) Exp (b) Lower Upper p-value
Intercept 1.34 0.345 3.819 1.943 7.516 <0.001
Pre-albumin < 15mg/dL 0.43 0.055 1.542 1.384 1.719 <0.001
Age 0.01 0.003 1.007 1.002 1.013 0.007
Preop CVA 0.24 0.140 1.275 0.969 1.031 0.082
Preop COPD 0.22 0.068 1.24 1.085 0.921 0.002
Preop Kidney Disease 0.27 0.142 1.311 0.992 1.008 0.057
Preop Chronic Anemia −0.68 0.170 0.509 0.365 2.740 <0.001
Preop FEV1% 0.00 0.001 0.996 0.993 0.999 0.005

b, unstandardized model coefficient; S.E. (b), standard error for model coefficient “b”; Exp (b), exponential of model coefficient “b”; CI, confidence interval; Preop, pre-operative; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary lung disease; FEV1%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of predicted.

Table 12.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis for Postoperative Complications

Variables B S.E. Wald p-Value OR 95% CI OR
Pre-albumin 15mg/dL −0.879 0.224 15.411 <0.001 0.415 0.268 0.644
Female 0.708 0.215 10.887 0.001 2.030 1.333 3.090
Preop COPD 0.620 0.253 6.028 0.014 1.859 1.133 3.050
Preop Other Arrhythmias 1.270 0.476 7.114 0.008 3.561 1.400 9.056
Preop GERD 0.561 0.261 4.623 0.032 1.752 1.051 2.921
Preop Chronic Anemia −2.571 1.116 5.310 0.021 0.076 0.009 0.681
Constant −0.824 0.186 19.567 <0.001 0.439

b, unstandardized regression weight; S.E., standard error for “b”; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Preop, pre-operative; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary lung disease; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.

After controlling for the variables that were found significant in univariate analyses, having lowest postoperative pre-albumin levels below 15 mg/dL remained a significant predictor for hospital LOS (P < .001) (Table 10), chest tube duration (P < .001) (Table 11), and postoperative complications (P < .001) (Table 12). Specifically, the median hospital LOS for patients with lowest pre-albumin less than 15 mg/dL was 1.5 days longer than for patients with lowest pre-albumin greater than or equal to 15 mg/dL, while the median chest tube duration was 1.37 times higher. Patients with lowest pre-albumin less than 15 mg/dL had a 55% higher chance of developing postoperative complications than patients with lowest pre-albumin greater than or equal to 15 mg/dL.

Table 11.

Multivariable Generalized Linear Model Analysis for Chest Tube Duration

95% Wald CI Exp (b)
Variables b S.E. (b) Exp (b) Lower Upper p-value
Intercept 1.582 0.474 4.865 1.923 12.305 0.001
Pre-albumin < 15mg/dL 0.314 0.070 1.369 1.195 1.570 <0.001
Female −0.300 0.069 0.741 0.647 0.849 < 0.001
BMI −0.012 0.006 0.988 0.977 0.999 0.036
Preop Other Arrhythmias 0.467 0.152 1.595 1.184 2.151 0.002
Preop COPD 0.248 0.086 1.281 1.083 1.517 0.004
Preop Asthma −0.334 0.128 0.716 0.557 0.920 0.009
Preop Pulmonary Fibrosis −0.658 0.322 0.518 0.276 0.973 0.041
Preop GERD 0.300 0.085 1.35 1.145 1.594 <0.001
Preop Chronic Anemia −0.703 0.216 0.495 0.324 0.755 0.001
Preop FEV1% −0.004 0.002 0.996 0.993 1.000 0.045

b, unstandardized model coefficient; S.E. (b), standard error for model coefficient “b”; Exp (b), exponential of model coefficient “b”; CI, confidence interval; Preop, pre-operative; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary lung disease, FEV1%, forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percent of predicted.

Survival Analysis

Patients with lowest postoperative pre-albumin below 15 mg/dL had significantly lower 1-year overall survival (OS) (OS; hazard ratio [HR]:0.421, 95% CI: 0.215–0.825, P = .012), 3-year OS (HR:0.493, 95% CI: 0.319–0.762, P = .001), and 5-year OS (HR:0.524, 95% CI: 0.361–0.761, P = .001) compared to patients with lowest postoperative pre-albumin at or above 15 mg/dL (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves Based on Lowest Postoperative Pre-albumin Level.

In univariate Cox regression analyses, pre-albumin, age, gender, size of tumor, and pre-operative CVA, coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis, and diabetes mellitus were significant predictors of OS (Table 13). Patients with lowest pre-albumin greater than or equal to 15 mg/dL were 48% less likely to die than patients with lowest pre-albumin less than 15 mg/dL (HR:0.524, 95% CI: 0.361–0.761, P = .001).

Table 13.

Univariate Cox Regression Analysis for Survival

Variables B SE Wald p-Value HR 95.0% CI
Pre-albumin < 15mg/dL −0.646 0.19 11.514 0.001 0.524 0.361 0.761
Age 0.032 0.009 13.553 <0.001 1.033 1.015 1.050
BSA 0.357 0.317 1.272 0.259 1.429 0.768 2.659
BMI −0.005 0.015 0.111 0.739 0.995 0.967 1.024
Preop CVA 0.862 0.329 6.887 0.009 2.368 1.244 4.508
Preop CAD or MI 0.565 0.196 8.335 0.004 1.760 1.199 2.583
Preop Heart Valvular Disease/Cardiomyopathy 0.167 0.301 0.309 0.578 1.182 0.655 2.132
Preop Atrial Fibrillation 0.722 0.273 7.007 0.008 2.059 1.206 3.516
Preop Other Arrhythmias 0.002 0.363 0.000 0.995 1.002 0.492 2.043
Preop Carotid Stenosis 0.224 0.327 0.469 0.493 1.252 0.659 2.378
Preop CHF 0.814 0.508 2.570 0.109 2.256 0.834 6.100
Preop Hypertension 0.431 0.168 6.549 0.010 1.539 1.106 2.140
Preop Hyperlipidemia 0.306 0.164 3.493 0.062 1.358 0.985 1.871
Preop Peripheral Vascular Disease 0.634 0.344 3.388 0.066 1.884 0.960 3.700
Preop COPD 0.437 0.190 5.301 0.021 1.547 1.067 2.244
Preop OSA 0.067 0.328 0.041 0.839 1.069 0.562 2.031
Preop Asthma −0.109 0.327 0.111 0.739 0.897 0.472 1.703
Preop Pneumonia 0.017 0.290 0.004 0.953 1.017 0.576 1.797
Preop Pulmonary Fibrosis 1.722 0.512 11.296 0.001 5.593 2.050 15.264
Preop PE or DVT 0.742 0.328 5.112 0.024 2.099 1.104 3.992
Preop Cirrhosis or Liver Failure 0.072 1.004 0.005 0.943 1.075 0.150 7.690
Preop Pancreatitis 0.936 0.584 2.566 0.109 2.549 0.811 8.007
Preop GERD* 0.146 0.201 0.522 0.470 1.157 0.779 1.717
Preop Kidney Disease 0.712 0.389 3.357 0.067 2.038 0.952 4.365
Preop Chronic Anemia 0.094 0.584 0.026 0.873 1.098 0.350 3.448
Preop Coagulation, Hemophilias, or Thrombocytopenia −3.019 3.962 0.581 0.446 0.049 0.000 115.034
Preop Diabetes Mellitus 0.397 0.195 4.145 0.042 1.487 1.015 2.178
Previous Cancers −0.102 0.164 0.387 0.534 0.903 0.655 1.245
Size of tumor (cm) 0.186 0.031 35.757 <0.001 1.204 1.133 1.280
Gender 0.645 0.164 15.552 <0.001 1.907 1.383 2.628

b, unstandardized model coefficient; SE, standard error for “b”; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Preop, pre-operative; BSA, body surface area; BMI, body mass index; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; CAD, coronary artery disease; MI, myocardial infarction; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary lung disease; PE, pulmonary embolism; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.

In a multivariable analysis controlled for age, gender, preop CVA, pre-op atrial fibrillation, pre-op pulmonary fibrosis, and size of tumor, lowest postoperative pre-albumin remained a significant predictor of survival. Specifically, patients with lowest postoperative pre-albumin equal to or above 15 mg/dL at any time point in the study period were 35% less likely to die than patients with lowest pre-albumin below 15 mg/dL (HR: 0.652, 95% CI: 0.438, 0.969, P = .034) (Table 14).

Table 14.

Multivariable Cox Regression Analysis for Survival

Parameters B SE Wald p-Value HR 95.0% CI
Pre-albumin < 15mg/dL −0.428 0.202 4.482 0.034 0.652 0.438 0.969
Age 0.022 0.010 5.069 0.024 1.022 1.003 1.042
Female 0.442 0.181 5.987 0.014 1.555 1.092 2.216
Preop CVA 0.876 0.343 6.527 0.011 2.402 1.226 4.706
Preop Atrial Fibrillation 0.677 0.301 5.036 0.025 1.967 1.089 3.552
Preop Pulmonary Fibrosis 1.252 0.526 5.661 0.017 3.498 1.247 9.811
Size of tumor (cm) 0.193 0.034 32.891 < 0.001 1.212 1.135 1.295

B, unstandardized model coefficient; SE, standard error for “b”; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; Preop, pre-operative; CVA, cerebrovascular accident.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that perioperative nutrition status, as measured by postoperative pre-albumin, plays an important role in predicting chest tube duration, hospital LOS, postoperative complications, and long-term survival in lung cancer patients following RAVT pulmonary lobectomy. Specifically, in this study we identified that patients who dropped below 15 mg/dL of pre-albumin during their hospital stay were at increased risk for longer chest tube duration and hospital LOS, higher rates of postoperative complications, and worse overall survival. Patients with improved pre-operative nutritional status have been shown to have less significant drops in albumin levels in the postoperative period.14 By extension, we would predict that patients who have less significant drops in pre-albumin levels during the postoperative period are the patients with higher pre-operative pre-albumin levels. Studies have shown that perioperative interventions for improving nutritional status in lung cancer patients undergoing surgical resection via various modalities are associated with decreased hospital LOS and chest tube duration, reduced number of postoperative complications, decreased cost of patient care, improved lung function, and improved morbidity and mortality.1417

In our analysis of OS at 1, 3, and 5 years postoperatively, low postoperative pre-albumin and, thus, poor nutritional status was significantly predictive of decreased survival. Specifically, in our study patients with adequate nutrition were 35% less likely to die compared to patients with poor nutrition (lowest pre-albumin less than 15 mg/dL). This finding is consistent with literature that has identified poor nutrition to be independently associated with decreased OS following thoracotomy and lobectomy.5 Although there are currently no published guidelines for nutritional intervention in lung cancer patients undergoing MIS, our findings implicate that adequate nutritional status in the perioperative period is associated with improved OS and decreased hospital LOS and postoperative complications, and possibly by extension decreased hospital costs.

Malnutrition is associated with an increased inflammatory state,18 which in turn produces poor wound healing and a weakened immune response. Malnutrition is one of the most common causes for immunodeficiency worldwide.19 C-reactive protein (CRP), a marker for inflammation, has been found to be independently and significantly correlated with pre-albumin levels,20 also supporting the relationship between malnutrition and inflammation. Inflammatory states are associated with increased production of cytokines, including IL-6, a cytokine that has been identified as an independent predictor for poor prognosis in lung cancer patients.18

Increased skin-to-skin duration and EBL was significantly predicted by larger tumor size, and, in our study, patients with poor nutrition had significantly larger tumor sizes. The relationship between malnutrition and inflammation could also help explain the increased skin-to-skin duration, EBL, chest tube duration, and hospital LOS as well as higher rates of postoperative complications in patients in the poor nutrition group for our study. Significant increases in complications, such as pneumonia and prolonged air leaks, in the low pre-albumin group could be explained by weakness of expiratory muscles, decreased chest wall expansion, and poor wound healing that have been observed in malnourished patients.21,22

Pre-operative pancreatitis was observed to significantly predict increased chest tube duration. Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is associated with malnourishment due to lack of pancreatic enzymes needed for adequate digestion and absorptions of carbohydrates and lipids, including fat-soluble vitamins. Due to this lack of digestion, CP patients often suffer from steatorrhea and chronic diarrhea.23 It has also been found that 30%–50% of patients with CP have increased resting energy expenditure,23 which has been reported as a poor prognostic indicator in patients with lung cancer.24 The association between pancreatitis, nutritional status, and resting energy expenditure could account for some of our findings in this study.

Our study had an interesting finding in that pre-operative chronic anemia was significantly and inversely predictive postoperative complications. Although pre-operative anemia has been associated with decreased survival following lung cancer resection,25 it is possible that our patient population received transfusions or additional care that was not analyzed in our study. We did not include measurements of postoperative anemia or whether these patients received interventions due to their pre-operative anemia that resulted in better outcomes.

Limitations of our study include that it is retrospective and that the procedures were performed by one surgeon and at a single institution. Our study was also limited by the lack of comparison of pre-operative pre-albumin values because only one patient in the study group had this value measured pre-operatively. Additionally, the lowest pre-albumin was not a standardized measure among the patients with respect to when the value was measured postoperatively. The lowest value could have occurred at different time points for different patients (i.e. within first 48 hours postoperatively or closer to discharge). The dichotomous grouping of patients above and below a pre-albumin level of 15 mg/dL is based on this value being the lower limit of the normal range for serum pre-albumin levels at our institution’s clinical laboratory, which allowed comparison of patients with normal pre-albumin levels and those with below-normal pre-albumin levels. While this dichotomy may not have allowed analysis of outcomes between modestly malnourished patients and severely malnourished patients, subgrouping patients in future investigations will allow analyzing differences between modestly malnourished patients (e.g. pre-albumin = 10 to 14.9) and severely malnourished patients (e.g. pre-albumin ≤ 10) and their respective associations with postoperative risks.

CONCLUSION

In our study, we found that pre-albumin that dropped below 15 mg/dL during the postoperative period (including within 48 hours after surgery) independently predicted a longer hospital LOS and worse OS. Additionally, low pre-albumin and, thus, poor nutritional status significantly predicted greater EBL, longer skin-to-skin operative time, chest tube duration, and number of postoperative complications. Addressing the nutritional status in patients undergoing RAVT pulmonary lobectomy could result in decreased hospital costs and better patient outcomes. Therefore, the recommendation of nutritionally supplementing patients in the perioperative period, whether pre- or postoperatively, should be evaluated further.

Footnotes

Disclosure: EMT and JPF have had financial relationships with Intuitive Surgical, Inc., in the form of honoraria received as robotic thoracic surgery observation sites and proctors.

Conflict of interests: none.

Funding sources: This study was supported in part by the Health Professions Scholarship Program awarded to AJ from the United States Air Force and by an award to SK from the Scholarly Excellence, Leadership Experiences, Collaborative Training (SELECT) Program of the University of South Florida Health, Morsani College of Medicine. There were no other sources of support or funding.

Informed consent: Dr. Eric M. Toloza declares that written informed consent was obtained from the patient/s for publication of this study/report and any accompanying images.

Contributor Information

Anastasia Jermihov, University of S Florida Health, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL..

Athanasios Tsalatsanis, University of S Florida Health, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL..

Shruti Kulkarni, University of S Florida Health, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL..

Frank O. Velez, University of S Florida Health, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL..

Carla C. Moodie, Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Tampa, FL..

Joseph R. Garrett, Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Tampa, FL..

Eric M. Toloza, University of S Florida Health, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL.; Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Tampa, FL.

References:

  • 1.Bagan P, Berna P, De Dominicis F, et al. Nutritional status and postoperative outcome after pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(2):392–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bashir Y, Graham TR, Torrance A, Gibson GJ, Corris PA. Nutritional state of patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracotomy. Thorax. 1990;45(3):183–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ge T, Lin T, Yang J, Wang M. Nutritional status and related factors of patients with advanced lung cancer in northern China: a retrospective study. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2225–2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jagoe RT, Goodship TH, Gibson GJ. The influence of nutritional status on complications after operations for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(3):936–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tewari N, Martin-Ucar AE, Black E, et al. Nutritional status affects long term survival after lobectomy for lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007;57(3):389–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gibbs J, Cull W, Henderson W, Daley J, Hur K, Khuri SF. Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: results from the National VA Surgical Risk Study. Arch Surg. 1999;134(1):36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dziedzic D, Orlowski T. The Role of VATS in lung cancer surgery: current status and prospects for development. Minim Invasive Surg. 2015;2015:938430–938430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Novellis P, Bottoni E, Voulaz E, et al. Robotic surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and open surgery for early stage lung cancer: comparison of costs and outcomes at a single institute. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(2):790–798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ricciardi S, Davini F, Zirafa CC, Melfi F. From “open” to robotic assisted thoracic surgery: why RATS and not VATS? J Vis Surg. 2018;4:107–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Beck FK, Rosenthal TC. Pre-albumin: a marker for nutritional evaluation. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65(8):1575–1578. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Measurement of visceral protein status in assessing protein and energy malnutrition: standard of care. Pre-albumin in Nutritional Care Consensus Group. Nutrition. 1995;11(2):169–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kawai H, Ota H. Low perioperative serum pre-albumin predicts early recurrence after curative pulmonary resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36(12):2853–2857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bianchi RC, de Souza JN, Giaciani Cde A, Hoehr NF, Toro IF. Prognostic factors for complications following pulmonary resection: pre-albumin analysis, time on mechanical ventilation, and other factors. J Bras Pneumol. 2006;32(6):489–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kaya SO, Akcam TI, Ceylan KC, Samancılar O, Ozturk O, Usluer O. Is preoperative protein-rich nutrition effective on postoperative outcome in non-small cell lung cancer surgery? A prospective randomized study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11(1):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Robinson LA, Tanvetyanon T, Grubbs D, et al. Preoperative nutrition-enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for thoracic neoplasms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. June 25, 2020. (Epub ahead of print). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang J, Zhang Q, Wang X. Role of nutritional support for postoperative recovery of respiratory function in patients with primary lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(5):5978–5982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Madani A, Fiore JF, Wang Y, et al. An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy. Surgery. 2015;158(4):899–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martín F, Santolaria F, Batista N, et al. Cytokine levels (IL-6 and IFN-gamma), acute phase response and nutritional status as prognostic factors in lung cancer. Cytokine. 1999;11(1):80–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chandra RK. Nutrition and the immune system: an introduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66(2):460S–463S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alifano M, Mansuet-Lupo A, Lococo F, et al. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and tumor immune microenvironment determine outcome of resected non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106914-e106914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lunardi AC, Miranda CS, Silva KM, Cecconello I, Carvalho CRF. Weakness of expiratory muscles and pulmonary complications in malnourished patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. Respirology. 2012;17(1):108–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Loran DB, Woodside KJ, Cerfolio RJ, Zwischenberger JB. Predictors of alveolar air leaks. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2002;12(3):477–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rasmussen HH, Irtun O, Olesen SS, Drewes AM, Holst M. Nutrition in chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(42):7267–7275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hansell DT, Davies JW, Burns HJ. The relationship between resting energy expenditure and weight loss in benign and malignant disease. Ann Surg. 1986;203(3):240–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Panagopoulos ND, Karakantza M, Koletsis E, et al. Influence of blood transfusions and preoperative anemia on long-term survival in patients operated for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;62(2):273–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons are provided here courtesy of Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons

RESOURCES