Abstract

We demonstrate the formation of both Josephson junctions and superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) using a dry transfer technique to stack and deterministically misalign mechanically exfoliated flakes of NbSe2. The current–voltage characteristics of the resulting twisted NbSe2–NbSe2 junctions are found to be sensitive to the misalignment angle of the crystallographic axes, opening up a new control parameter for optimization of the device performance, which is not available in thin-film-deposited junctions. A single lithographic process has then been implemented to shape Josephson junctions into SQUID geometries with typical loop areas of ∼25 μm2 and weak links ∼600 nm wide. At T = 3.75 K in an applied magnetic field, these devices display large stable current and voltage modulation depths of up to ΔIc ∼ 75% and ΔV ∼ 1.4 mV, respectively.
Keywords: Van der Waal heterostructures, Josephson junction, Superconducting quantum interference device, Two-dimensional materials, NbSe2
Superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) are key components in the development of ultrasensitive electric and magnetic measurement systems.1 The basic SQUID design consists of a superconducting ring intersected by one (rf SQUID) or two (dc SQUID) Josephson junctions; the latter consists of two superconducting electrodes coupled by weak links that allow the flow of supercurrent.2,3 The weak link can take a variety of forms including point contacts, physical constrictions, or heterostructures consisting of a thin normal metal or insulating barrier separating the two superconductors.4 The latter type is typically fabricated by deposition of metallic superconductors such as Al and Nb, with the tunneling barrier formed by an oxide layer.5,6 This oxide barrier varies in thickness on the atomic scale and often contains defect traps, which can lead to highly nonuniform supercurrent distributions.7 In addition, over time, oxygen atoms in the oxide barrier can diffuse out, altering the normal state resistance of the junction resulting in a variation of the critical current, a process that can be detrimental to the longevity of the device.8 Since Josephson junctions are the basis of many superconducting technologies such as qubits,9 quantum metrology,10 and superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), the development and incorporation of new materials with improved properties and functionality are vital.
An alternative route to the fabrication of oxide-free Josephson junctions is the stacking of two-dimensional materials (2D) into vertical van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures,11 a technique which holds promise for creating atomically clean and defect free interfaces. Additionally, vdW-based devices provide access to a wide variety of crystalline superconducting materials such as Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ,12 FeSe,13 and 2H-NbSe2.14 These materials all share a common characteristic in that they have a layered structure and easily cleave perpendicular to the c-axis. These properties, along with the availability of dry transfer techniques,15 have allowed the fabrication of vdW heterostructure devices comprised of two or more mechanically exfoliated flakes. Such devices include junctions with dielectric tunneling barriers,16,17 superconducting-normal-superconducting Josephson junctions,18 and van der Waals interface Josephson junctions,19 which may prove useful in the formation of superconducting qubits.20 Furthermore, a vdW-based device offers an additional variable in the form of controlling the relative twist angle between the crystallographic axes of the two materials;21 a degree of freedom which is not available in conventional heterostructures. This twisting creates a misalignment between the two crystals, changing the atomic registry at the interface and leading to angular-dependent interlayer interactions. This enables one to tune the electronic coupling via the twist angle, leading to effects such as band hybridization,22,23 minigaps and band replicas due to scattering on moiré potentials,24 charge transfer and changes in effective masses,25 and has led to the discovery of a moiré superlattice in graphene/h-BN,26 as well as electrically tunable superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene.27 This new field of study, named twistronics, may prove valuable in the incorporation of two-dimensional materials into more complex vdW superconducting devices such as qubits and SQUIDs.
In this study, twisted NbSe2–NbSe2 heterostructures are formed by stacking two NbSe2 flakes with a well-determined misalignment of the crystallographic axes using the procedure described in Methods and highlighted in Figure 1a. Briefly, two NbSe2 flakes are sequentially stacked with a small overlap onto a Si/SiO2 substrate with prepatterned Au contacts and encapsulated with a thin layer of hexagonal boron nitride. Typical junction areas are on the order of 20–60 μm2 (Figure 1b,c).
Figure 1.
(a) Schematic of the device fabrication method. (i) Au contacts are deposited onto a Si/SiO2 substrate. (ii) A single exfoliation is made of a bulk NbSe2 crystal, and the resulting flakes are transferred onto a PDMS stamp. (iii) The PDMS is brought into contact with the substrate, which is tilted at a small angle. The PDMS is slowly pressed into the substrate until the boundary of the PDMS-substrate contact region lies beyond one of the flakes. (iv) The PDMS is then retracted, leaving the first flake deposited onto the Au contacts. The substrate is then rotated such that the crystallographic axes of the two NbSe2 flakes are now misaligned by an angle θ. (v) The second flake is positioned above the first, and the PDMS is brought into contact with the substrate. (vi) The PDMS is now retracted, leaving the second flake contacting both the first flake and the Au contacts. (b) Optical micrograph of two NbSe2 flakes on a PDMS stamp. (c) Optical micrograph of the two overlapping NbSe2 flakes on SiO2/Si. Here one of the flakes (labeled #2) has been rotated by 60°. (d) Temperature-dependence of the normalized resistance R(T)/R(294 K) for the two NbSe2 flakes and the overlapping junction region between them. The inset shows an expanded view of the superconducting transitions.
Before describing the characterization of devices patterned with SQUID geometries, we investigate the transport properties of twisted NbSe2–NbSe2 junctions. The temperature-dependence of the normalized four-point resistance R(T)/R(294 K) from 4 to 294 K is shown in Figure 1d for two NbSe2 flakes with a relative twist angle of 60°, as well as the resulting junction formed by the overlap region. We note that there is an uncertainty of ±1° in the misalignment angle of devices arising from both the resolution of the rotation stage and unwanted movement of the PDMS during the stamping progress. Both flakes and junction show metallic transport behavior, which is phonon-limited at high temperature (R ∝ T) and disorder limited at low temperature (R approaches a constant value) before reaching the superconducting state at Tc ∼ 7 K.28 As the Tc of NbSe2 is known to reduce in flakes <10 layers,16,17 all flakes used were at least 10 nm thick, ensuring negligible suppression of Tc. The residual resistance ratio (RRR), defined as R(T = 294 K)/R(T = 8 K), is found to be ∼30 for the two NbSe2 flakes, with a small variation due to the slightly different flake thicknesses. This is in contrast to the RRR of the junction region which is found to vary between ∼10–25 depending on the twist angle (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). A close up of the superconducting transition is shown in Figure 1d, where it can be seen that the junction displays a slightly broader transition width when compared to the individual NbSe2 flakes, indicative of additional disorder at the interface.
Josephson Junction Performance
Next, we examine the current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of a NbSe2–NbSe2 junction for temperatures T = 3 to 7.5 K (S1, Figure 2a). Here the misorientation angle of the junction is estimated to be θ ∼ 6° from comparison of optical micrographs of the two flakes. From the presence of distinct retrapping currents in the I–V curves, it is clear that the junction behavior is typical of an underdamped Josephson junction. This indicates that the vdW interface decouples the superconducting order parameters and creates a weak link that allows the flow of a Josephson supercurrent. In agreement with the conclusions of Yabuki et al.19 we also find that our devices are reasonably well described by the RCSJ model indicating that they are operating in the superconducting tunnel junction limit. Each NbSe2 flake has multiple electrical contacts, allowing the use of different voltage lead configurations to confirm that the bulk critical current of each flake is substantially larger than that of the junction. Assuming that the vdW barrier is insulating, the temperature dependence of the critical current, Ic, can be calculated using the Ambegaokar–Baratoff (AB) theory,29 in which Ic(T) is expressed as
| 1 |
where Ic(0) and Δ(0) are the zero-temperature critical current and superconducting gap, respectively. Δ(T) can be described by an interpolation approximation to the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) theory temperature-dependent superconducting energy gap:
| 2 |
Figure 2.

(a) Current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of a NbSe2–NbSe2 junction (sample S1, θ ≈ 6°) for temperatures between T = 3 and 7.5 K. (b) Temperature dependence of the critical current Ic (red) and retrapping current (white). The dashed line is calculated from AB theory (see text). (c) I–V characteristics for sample S2 (θ ≈ 20°) at T = 3.75 K. (d) Temperature dependence of dI/dV versus V between T = 3.75 and 6.75 K. (e) Temperature dependence of the estimated superconducting gap Δ. The dashed line is calculated from an interpolation approximation to the BCS theory.
The fit in Figure 2b shows that the critical current of sample S1 is reasonably well described by AB theory, in agreement with previous reports on NbSe2 Josephson junctions,19 despite the assumption of a symmetric single gap superconductor. This allows us to estimate Δ(0) = 0.90 mV and Ic(0) = 1.06 mA.
However, not all devices fabricated behave as underdamped junctions, and upon examination of a second device presented in Figure 2c (S2, θ ∼ 20°), we observe I–V characteristics which are non hysteretic, indicative of a junction which is in the strongly overdamped regime (βc < 1). Here, nonlinear features arise due to quasiparticle currents that reveal information about the superconducting density of states. We examine this in Figure 2d by taking the numerical differential of the measured I–V curves. From this, we observe an intricate non-BCS-like gap structure, with peaks located at ±1.79 mV at T = 3.75 K. Furthermore, we observe a shoulder-like hump at lower energy (±1 mV), similar to that seen in tunneling spectroscopy of NbSe2 using van der Waals tunnel barriers.16,17 Using the BCS approximation in eq 2, we can extract the zero-temperature superconducting gap Δ(0) = 0.93 meV as shown in Figure 2e.
Angular Dependence
Having observed strikingly different characteristics in NbSe2–NbSe2 junctions prepared using the same fabrication method, we turn our attention to the role of twist angle in these devices. Using the method presented in Figure 1a, we are able to fabricate devices with a determined misalignment angle relative to the crystallographic axes of the two flakes. The results are shown in Figure 3a–d, in which we present the current density–voltage (J–V) characteristics of four NbSe2–NbSe2 junctions with twist angles in the range θ ≈ 0–60°. First, we examine the θ ≈ 0° device, in which hysteresis is observed in the J–V characteristics, indicating the junction is an underdamped Josephson junction. In samples with larger twist angles (>10°, Figure 3b), this hysteresis disappears, giving rise to reversible junctions which show features of quasiparticle gap structure at angles >20° (Figure 3c). As the twist angle is increased beyond about 40°, the gap features disappear, and the hysteresis eventually returns near θ ≈ 60° (Figure 3d). In Figure 3e, we plot the critical current density Jc as a function of twist angle θ for 7 NbSe2 junctions. From this, it can be seen that Jc is maximum at values of θ ≈ 0° and 60°, with a minimum at 30°.
Figure 3.

(a) Current density–voltage (J–V) characteristics for twisted NbSe2–NbSe2 junctions with twist angles θ ≈ 0°, (b) 10°, (c) 30°, (d) 60°. The red and black arrows indicate the direction of the current sweep. (e) Variation of the critical current density of 7 NbSe2–NbSe2 junctions with twist angles between 0°–60°. Devices that displayed hysteretic (nonhysteretic) J–V characteristics are represented by closed (open) symbols. The dashed line is a guide to the eye. All measurements were recorded at T = 3.75 K.
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) data30 and density functional theory calculations31 show that there are five electronic bands crossing the Fermi energy in NbSe2. Of these, one is a small Se-4p pz-derived “pancake″-shaped hole pocket, while the other four are Nb-4d-derived bands with roughly cylindrical Fermi surfaces centered at the Γ and K points in the Brillouin zone. Based on ARPES measurements, the Se pancake has been shown to exhibit no superconducting gap, while the Nb-derived sheets display superconductivity, which is strongly anisotropic in k.32,33 This anisotropy of the superconducting order parameter is characterized by maxima in the gap at 60° intervals around the Fermi sheets. From this, we hypothesize that at twist angles close to 30°, tunneling is dominated by processes that couple regions of the Fermi surface with a maximum gap in one layer with regions of a minimum gap in the other layer. This angular-dependent selectivity in the tunneling process suppresses the critical current Ic, leading to a lower value of βc and nonhysteretic I–V characteristics.
The observed twist dependence could also be related to the specific atomic arrangement at the interface, which depends on the flake terminations as well as any effects arising from relative lateral displacements of the two flakes. However, the latter is expected to be negligible in our large overlap regions, which are many hundreds of unit cells wide. We note that we have minimized any variation in the interface quality and homogeneity by performing all fabrication in the inert environment provided by a nitrogen glovebox.
SQUID Performance
Having established the ability to fabricate high quality nonhysteretic Josephson junctions, we examine the ability to use them in more complex superconducting devices such as superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). Junction devices were patterned into a SQUID geometry using reactive ion etching as described in Methods. An image of a typical device is shown in Figure 4a with a schematic shown in Figure 4b and consists of a superconducting loop between two ∼600 nm wide Josephson junctions formed in the overlap region of the two NbSe2 flakes (2–3 μm). The SQUID loop is of width, W ≈ 3.5 μm, and length, L ≈ 7.0 μm, creating an internal hole of area ≈24.5 μm2.
Figure 4.
(a) Optical image of an etched SQUID structure (θ ≈ 25°). The inset shows a close up of the structure, with the overlap region between the two NbSe2 flakes highlighted in red. (b) Schematic diagram of the SQUID device shown in panel a. (c) Critical current as a function of temperature in zero applied field of the SQUID device shown in panel a. The dashed line is calculated from the AB theory (see text). (d) Current–voltage (I–V) characteristics at T = 3.75 K of the device shown in panel a. The red (blue) curve corresponds to the maximum (minimum) value of the positive critical current Ic within one period. (e) Modulation of Ic as a function of the applied magnetic flux under a voltage bias of V = 900 μV (f) and V = 10 μV at T = 3.75 K. (g) Voltage modulation as a function of the magnetic flux under a current bias of I = 50 μA at T = 3.75 K. A horizontal shift has been applied to panels (e-g) to account for the Earth’s magnetic field.
When an external magnetic field B ∥c is applied, phase shifts are induced between the two junctions
leading to interference and a net critical current that oscillates
with a period B0 = Φ0/Aeff, where Aeff includes corrections to the geometrical area of the superconducting
loop due to effects such as flux focusing. To characterize the effect
of an external magnetic field on our NbSe2–NbSe2 SQUIDs, we have performed electrical transport measurements
at temperatures down to T = 3.75 K. Figure 4c shows the temperature dependence
of the critical current calculated using AB theory. The extracted
zero-temperature critical current density is found to be Jc(0) = 1.41 Acm–2 using Δ(0) =
0.96 meV. We observed no reduction of the critical temperature, indicating
that etching caused no measurable deterioration of the junction quality. Figure 4d shows the current–voltage
characteristics for a NbSe2 SQUID, with the two curves
corresponding to the maximum,
, and minimum,
, measured values of the critical current
within a single oscillation period. The modulation of the critical
current, Ic(Φ) for two different
voltage set points, is shown in Figure 4e,f, where Φ is the applied magnetic flux. Under
a bias voltage of V = 900 μV, the current modulation
depth is 33%, which increases to 75% for a bias of V = 10 μV. The noise level of the signal increased slightly
at V = 10 μV due to small temperature oscillations
arising from the refrigeration cycle of the closed-cycle cryostat
(see Supporting Information for further
voltage/current set points, a discussion of device asymmetry, and
results from a second SQUID). The inductance parameter characterizes
the amplitude of the current modulation and is given by βL = 2LIc/Φ0,34 where Φ0 is the superconducting
flux quantum and L is the inductance of the SQUID
loop. Fitting our measured ΔIc data
to a numerical model,35 we estimate that
βL ≈ 2 and L ≈ 30
pH, which is a factor ∼2 large than other estimates of the
self-inductance based on the SQUID geometry.35 The area of the SQUID loop is 24.5 μm2, leading
to a theoretical value of B0 = ≃84
μT, assuming no corrections due to flux focusing, etc. This
theoretical value is close to the measured value of B0 = 78 μT.
An important property of SQUIDs
is the realization of nonhysteretic I–V characteristics (βc < 1), allowing
the use of flux-locked loop feedback schemes
to minimize the flux noise.36,37 We are able to tune
this desirable property in our NbSe2 SQUIDS by deterministically
controlling the twist angle during device fabrication, with a wide
range of angles, over which βc is found to be sufficiently
small. Figure 4g shows
the voltage under a bias current of 50 μA, as a function of
the magnetic field applied to the SQUID, revealing large voltage modulations
with a depth of ≈1.4 mV. The voltage modulation depth is characterized
by ΔV ≃ δRΔIc, where ΔIc is the critical current modulation depth, and δR is the differential
resistance of the SQUID calculated here to be δR ≃ 28
Ω at the maximum value of ΔV, i.e., the
peak of the dV/dI curve at positive
voltages. A large value of ΔV is required to
achieve low flux noise SQUID devices as it minimizes the noise contribution
from the amplifier
to the white flux noise, given
by
, in flux-locked operation.2,38 No degradation in Tc or Ic of these
SQUIDs was observed after multiple cooling
cycles or when remeasured after storage in a nitrogen glovebox for
4 weeks, indicating that they are both stable and suitable for repeated
long-term use.
Discussion
In conclusion, we have developed a method to fabricate Josephson junctions and SQUIDs based on a twisted van der Waal heterostructure architecture. The formation of Josephson junctions is achieved using a dry transfer method and requires no wet lithographic steps. The result is a junction device whose I–V characteristics can be deterministically tuned via the twist angle. A single lithographic process is then implemented to shape the Josephson junction into a SQUID geometry with typical loop areas of ≃25 μm2 and weak links ≃600 nm wide. We obtain voltage modulation depths of ΔV ≃ 1.4 mV and current modulation depths of ΔI ≃ 75% from devices that display long-term stability.
Our method demonstrates the ability to fully integrate 2D materials into the design of a SQUID, paving the way for designer superconducting circuits through the incorporation of other 2D materials, each with distinct electronic properties. The utilization of van der Waals bonded circuits may also have other advantages: here, the devices are only anchored to the substrate by the weak vdW force, allowing the possible pick-up and transfer of characterized SQUIDs onto other substrates or materials, while the intrinsically thin nature of 2D materials may allow their incorporation into flexible electronic circuits.39 Other applications for the technology is in the design of superconducting qubits such as those based on flux qubit architectures.40,41 It is well-known that the performance of these is often limited by dissipation, decoherence, and noise from two-level defect systems. The single crystalline structure of 2D flakes, along with low defect densities, may provide circuit components with superior performance.
Method
Thin flakes of NbSe2 were mechanically exfoliated from high-quality single crystals onto silicone elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamps. Flakes of suitable geometry and thickness (∼20–50 nm) were then sequentially transferred onto Si/SiO2 (300 nm oxide) substrates with prepatterned Au contacts. To ensure crystallographic alignment of the twisted vdW junctions, one single exfoliation of the bulk single crystal is performed, which results in multiple thin flakes with aligned crystallographic axes. From this, two neighboring flakes were chosen with a rotation of the substrate performed after stamping the first flake. The resulting device is thus a twisted vdW junction with the two flakes misaligned by a chosen angle with ±1° accuracy. The entire dry transfer setup is housed in a nitrogen glovebox with an oxygen and moisture content <1 ppm, ensuring an oxide free interface. Devices selected for fabrication into SQUIDs were subsequently capped with a thin layer (∼20 nm) of hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) using the same dry transfer technique. Following this, a poly(methyl methacrylate) e-beam resist was spin coated onto the substrate, which was then kept under a vacuum (10–6 mbar) overnight to remove any solvent. Next, standard e-beam lithography (EBL) was used to define the area of the junction to be etched to form the SQUID loop, before transfer into an inductively coupled plasma etcher. The sample was then reactively ion etched using an O2 + SF6 mixture, after which the sample was immersed in acetone to remove leftover resist before storage in a nitrogen glovebox. A total of 16 NbSe2 twisted junctions were measured, of which 7 were fabricated with a determined twist angle. A total of 9 SQUIDs were fabricated, 4 of which were fully characterized and showed the expected oscillatory dependence of critical current on applied magnetic field. A bias current of 1 μA was used for all resistance measurements.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Peter Heard at the IAC, University of Bristol, for their useful discussions and supporting work at the early phases of this study. The research was funded by the Bath/Bristol Centre for Doctoral Training in Condensed Matter Physics, under the EPSRC (UK) grant no. EP/L015544. The work at the University of Warwick is supported through EPSRC grant no. EP/T005963/1. A.N., Z.J.L., and S.D. acknowledge financial support from the Royal Society.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00152.
Table of Josephson junction parameters; table of SQUID parameters; twist angle dependence of the residual resistance ratio for the NbSe2 devices; capacitance analysis for a typical NbSe2 Josephson junction; further magnetic field-dependent voltage (critical current) oscillations at varying current (voltage) set points of the SQUID; asymmetry analysis of the device; analysis of a second SQUID with larger junction area (PDF)
Author Contributions
L.F. fabricated the devices under the supervision of S.B., with support from A.N. and Z.J.L. under the supervision of S.D. G.B. grew the single crystals. L.F. performed the measurements. L.F. and S.B. wrote the paper with comments and discussion from all authors.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Fagaly R. L. Superconducting quantum interference device instruments and applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006, 77, 101101. 10.1063/1.2354545. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke J.; Braginski A. I.. The SQUID handbook; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Clarke J.; Braginski A. I.. Applications of SQUIDs and SQUID systems. In The SQUID handbook; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006; Vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
- Likharev K. K. Superconducting weak links. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1979, 51, 101–159. 10.1103/RevModPhys.51.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gurvitch M.; Washington M. A.; Huggins H. A. High quality refractory Josephson tunnel junctions utilizing thin aluminum layers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1983, 42, 472–474. 10.1063/1.93974. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Likharev K. K.; Lukens J. Dyanmics of Josephson Junctions and Circuits. Phys. Today 1988, 41, 122. 10.1063/1.2811641. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng L. J.; Nik S.; Greibe T.; Krantz P.; Wilson C. M.; Delsing P.; Olsson E. Direct observation of the thickness distribution of ultra thin AlOx barriers in Al/AlOx/Al Josephson junctions. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2015, 48, 395308. 10.1088/0022-3727/48/39/395308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pop I. M.; Fournier T.; Crozes T.; Lecocq F.; Matei I.; Pannetier B.; Buisson O.; Guichard W. Fabrication of stable and reproducible submicron tunnel junctions. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Nanotechnol. Microelectron.: Mater., Process., Meas., Phenom. 2012, 30, 010607. 10.1116/1.3673790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kjaergaard M.; Schwartz M. E.; Braumüller J.; Krantz P.; Wang J. I. J.; Gustavsson S.; Oliver W. D. Superconducting qubits: Current state of play. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2020, 11, 369–395. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Scherer H.; Camarota B. Quantum metrology triangle experiments: a status review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2012, 23, 124010. 10.1088/0957-0233/23/12/124010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L.; Meric I.; Huang P. Y.; Gao Q.; Gao Y.; Tran H.; Taniguchi T.; Watanabe K.; Campos L. M.; Muller D. A.; Guo J.; Kim P.; Hone J.; Shepard K. L.; Dean C. R. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 2013, 342, 614–617. 10.1126/science.1244358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y.; Ma L.; Cai P.; Zhong R.; Ye C.; Shen J.; Gu G. D.; Chen X. H.; Zhang Y. High-temperature superconductivity in monolayer Bi2 Sr2 CaCu2 O8+δ. Nature 2019, 575, 156–163. 10.1038/s41586-019-1718-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farrar L. S.; Bristow M.; Haghighirad A. A.; McCollam A.; Bending S. J.; Coldea A. I. Suppression of superconductivity and enhanced critical field anisotropy in thin flakes of FeSe. npj Quantum Mater. 2020, 5, 1–7. 10.1038/s41535-020-0227-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xi X.; Wang Z.; Zhao W.; Park J. H.; Law K. T.; Berger H.; Forró L.; Shan J.; Mak K. F. Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe2 atomic layers. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 139–143. 10.1038/nphys3538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Castellanos-Gomez A.; Buscema M.; Molenaar R.; Singh V.; Janssen L.; Van Der Zant H. S.; Steele G. A. Deterministic transfer of two-dimensional materials by all-dry viscoelastic stamping. 2D Mater. 2014, 1, 011002. 10.1088/2053-1583/1/1/011002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Khestanova E.; Birkbeck J.; Zhu M.; Cao Y.; Yu G. L.; Ghazaryan D.; Yin J.; Berger H.; Forro L.; Taniguchi T.; Watanabe K.; Gorbachev R. V.; Mishchenko A.; Geim A. K.; Grigorieva I. V. Unusual Suppression of the Superconducting Energy Gap and Critical Temperature in Atomically Thin NbSe2. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 2623–2629. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dvir T.; Massee F.; Attias L.; Khodas M.; Aprili M.; Quay C. H.; Steinberg H. Spectroscopy of bulk and few-layer superconducting NbSe2 with van der Waals tunnel junctions. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 1–6. 10.1038/s41467-018-03000-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim M.; Park G. H.; Lee J.; Lee J. H.; Park J.; Lee H.; Lee G. H.; Lee H. J. Strong proximity Josephson coupling in vertically stacked NbSe2–graphene–NbSe2 van der Waals junctions. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 6125–6130. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yabuki N.; Moriya R.; Arai M.; Sata Y.; Morikawa S.; Masubuchi S.; Machida T. Supercurrent in van der Waals Josephson junction. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7 (1), 1–5. 10.1038/ncomms10616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X.; Hersam M. C. 2D materials for quantum information science. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 669–684. 10.1038/s41578-019-0136-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q.; Tsay Y. N.; Suenaga M.; Klemm R. A.; Gu G. D.; Koshizuka N. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 4160. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ohta T.; Robinson J. T.; Feibelman P. J.; Bostwick A.; Rotenberg E.; Beechem T. E. Evidence for interlayer coupling and moiré periodic potentials in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 186807. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.186807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson J. J. P.; Pei D.; Peng H.; Wang H.; Channa N.; Peng H. L.; Barinov A.; Schröter N. B. M.; Chen Y.; Mucha-Kruczyński M. Determination of interatomic coupling between two-dimensional crystals using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 1–7. 10.1038/s41467-020-17412-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pierucci D.; Henck H.; Avila J.; Balan A.; Naylor C. H.; Patriarche G.; Dappe Y. J.; Silly M. G.; Sirotti F.; Johnson A. T. C.; Asensio M. C.; Ouerghi A. Band alignment and minigaps in monolayer MoS2-graphene van der Waals heterostructures. Nano letters. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 4054–4061. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yeh P. C.; Jin W.; Zaki N.; Kunstmann J.; Chenet D.; Arefe G.; Sadowski J. T.; Dadap J. I.; Sutter P.; Hone J.; Osgood R. M. Jr Direct measurement of the tunable electronic structure of bilayer MoS2 by interlayer twist.. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 953–959. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dean C. R.; Wang L.; Maher P.; Forsythe C.; Ghahari F.; Gao Y.; Katoch J.; Ishigami M.; Moon P.; Koshino M.; Taniguchi T.; Watanabe K.; Shepard K. L.; Hone J.; Kim P. Hofstadter’s butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moiré superlattices. Nature 2013, 497, 598–602. 10.1038/nature12186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao Y.; Fatemi V.; Fang S.; Watanabe K.; Taniguchi T.; Kaxiras E.; Jarillo-Herrero P. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 2018, 556, 43–50. 10.1038/nature26160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naito M.; Tanaka S. Electrical Transport Properties in 2H-NbS2,-NbSe2,-TaS2 and-TaSe2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 51, 219–227. 10.1143/JPSJ.51.219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Barone A.; Paterno G.. Physics and applications of the Josephson effect; Wiley, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Yokoya T.; Kiss T.; Chainani A.; Shin S.; Nohara M.; Takagi H. Fermi surface sheet-dependent superconductivity in 2H-NbSe2. Science 2001, 294, 2518–2520. 10.1126/science.1065068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johannes M. D.; Mazin I. I.; Howells C. A. Fermi-surface nesting and the origin of the charge-density wave in NbSe2. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2006, 73, 205102. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Borisenko S. V.; Kordyuk A. A.; Zabolotnyy V. B.; Inosov D. S.; Evtushinsky D.; Buchner B.; Yaresko A. N.; Varykhalov A.; Follath R.; Eberhardt W.; Patthey L.; Berger H. Two energy gaps and Fermi-surface “arcs” in NbSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 166402. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.166402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahn D. J.; Hellmann S.; Kalläne M.; Sohrt C.; Kim T. K.; Kipp L.; Rossnagel K. Gaps and kinks in the electronic structure of the superconductor 2H-NbSe2 from angle-resolved photoemission at 1 K. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 85, 224532. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.224532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Muller J.; Weiss S.; Gross R.; Kleiner R.; Koelle D. Voltage-flux-characteristics of asymmetric DC SQUIDs. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2001, 11, 912–915. 10.1109/77.919493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brandt E. H.; Clem J. R. Superconducting thin rings with finite penetration depth. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2004, 69, 184509. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.184509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kleiner R.; Koelle D.; Ludwig F.; Clarke J. Superconducting quantum interference devices: State of the art and applications.. Proc. IEEE 2004, 92, 1534–1548. 10.1109/JPROC.2004.833655. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jose Martinez-Perez M.; Koelle D. Koelle NanoSQUIDs: Basics & recent advances. Phys. Sci. Rev. 2017, 2 (8), 1–27. 10.1515/psr-2017-5001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trabaldo E.; Pfeiffer C.; Andersson E.; Arpaia R.; Kalaboukhov A.; Winkler D.; Lombardi F.; Bauch T. Grooved Dayem nanobridges as building blocks of high-performance YBa2Cu3O7−δ SQUID magnetometers. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 1902–1907. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim S. J.; Choi K.; Lee B.; Kim Y.; Hong B. H. Materials for flexible, stretchable electronics: graphene and 2D materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015, 45, 63–84. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-020901. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chiorescu I.; Bertet P.; Semba K.; Nakamura Y.; Harmans C. J. P. M.; Mooij J. E. Coherent dynamics of a flux qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator.. Nature 2004, 431, 159–162. 10.1038/nature02831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan F.; Gustavsson S.; Kamal A.; Birenbaum J.; Sears A. P; Hover D.; Gudmundsen T. J.; Rosenberg D.; Samach G.; Weber S; Yoder J. L.; Orlando T. P.; Clarke J.; Kerman A. J.; Oliver W. D. The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7 (1), 1–9. 10.1038/ncomms12964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


