Insight into the Systematics of Novel Entomopathogenic Fungi Associated with Armored Scale Insect, Kuwanaspis howardi (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in China

Abstract

This study led to the discovery of three entomopathogenic fungi associated with Kuwanaspis howardi, a scale insect on Phyllostachys heteroclada (fishscale bamboo) and Pleioblastus amarus (bitter bamboo) in China. Two of these species belong to Podonectria: P. kuwanaspidis X.L. Xu & C.L. Yang sp. nov. and P. novae-zelandiae Dingley. The new species P. kuwanaspidis has wider and thicker setae, longer and wider asci, longer ascospores, and more septa as compared with similar Podonectria species. The morphs of extant species P. novae-zelandiae is confirmed based on sexual and asexual morphologies. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses of ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequence data provide further evidence for the validity of the two species and their placement in Podonectriaceae (Pleosporales). The second new species, Microcera kuwanaspidis X.L. Xu & C.L. Yang sp. nov., is established based on DNA sequence data from ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb1, rpb2, acl1, act, cmdA, and his3 gene regions, and it is characterized by morphological differences in septum numbers and single conidial mass.

1. Introduction

Podonectria was introduced by Petch [1] to accommodate species of Ophionectria, which are parasitic on scale insects and have thick-walled asci, long, multiseptate ascospores, and a tetracrium-like conidial stage. Ten species are listed in Index Fungorum [2]. The type species, Podonectria coccicola (Ellis and Everh.) Petch was transferred from Ophionectria coccicola (Ellis & Everh.) Berl. & Voglino and is associated with the scale insects Aonidiella aurantia (Maskell), Aspidiotus perniciosus (Comstock), Chrysomphalus aonidum (Linnaeus), Lepidosaphes beckii (Newman), L. gloverii (Packard), Leucapsis sp., Parlatoria pergandii Comstock, P. ziziphi Lucas, and Unaspis citri (Comstock) which are mainly found on Rutaceae [1,3,4,5]. Puttemansia aurantii (Henn.) Höhn, which was initially found from the type specimen of the asexual morph Tetracrium aurantii Henn. associated with scale insect Parlatoria ziziphi on Citrus aurantium L., was also transferred to Podonectria as P. aurantii (Henn.) Petch [1]. A new species collected from Lepidosaphes sp. on Citrus nobilis Lour. was named as Podonectria echinata [1]. Additionally, two new species, P. gahnia Dingley and P. novae-zelandiae Dingley, were reported by Dingley (1954) from scale insects in New Zealand [3], followed by a new fungus P. tenuispora Dennis collected from Lepidosaphes ulmi (Linnaeus) on Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull [6]. Subsequently, Rossman transferred Ophionectria coccorum Petch, associated with Fiorinia juniperi Kuwana, and Lasiosphaeria larvaespora Cooke & Massee on an undetermined scale insect to Podonectria, viz. P. coccorum (Petch) Rossman and P. larvaespora (Cooke & Massee) Rossman [7]. The species Trichonectria bambusicola Rehm was referred as P. bambusicola (Rehm) Piroz. on account of scolecosporous ascospores and tetracrium-like conidia by Pirozynski [8]. However, Podonectria bambusicola was excluded because of its occurrence on living leaves of bamboo rather than scale insects and remained an unclassified loculoascomycete [4]. Rossman published a monograph on Podonectria and accepted eight species [4]. An examination of the type specimen of T. bambusicola further revealed that this was a synonym of Uredinophila erinaceae (Rehm) Rossman [9]. The genus Podonectria was characterized by fleshy, white to brown, uninoculated ascomata with bitunicate asci and long, multiseptated ascospores associated with scale insects [4]. Spatafora et al. [10] transferred the previously reported species Podonectria cicadellidicola Kobayasi & Shimizu and P. citrina Kobayasi & Shimizu to Ophiocordyceps supported by the previous phylogenetic analyses presented in Quandt et al. [11]. Yang et al. [12] found P. sichuanensis C.L. Yang & X.L. Xu parasitic around the ascomata of Neostagonosporella sichuanensis C.L. Yang, X.L. Xu & K.D. Hyde on Phyllostachys heteroclada Oliv.

Microcera (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales), typified by Microcera coccophila Desm. and known as the “red-headed fungus”, is mostly parasitic on scale insects with fusarium-like asexual morphs. The genus has been considered as a synonym in major taxonomic revisions of Fusarium Link [13,14,15,16,17]. A multilocus phylogenetic approach was subsequently applied to identify species in the fusarium-like clade since morphological identification was difficult [18,19,20]. Gräfenhan et al. [18] resurrected Microcera based on DNA sequence data and accepted four Microcera species, viz. M. coccophila, M. diploa (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Gräfenhan & Seifert, M. rubra Gräfenhan & Seifert, M. larvarum (Fuckel) Gräfenhan, Seifert & Schroers. Lombard et al. [19] further investigated phylogenetic relationships of Microcera based on DNA sequence data and reported that it constitutes a lineage distantly related to Fusarium but closely related to Fusicolla and Macroconia.

Armored scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Diaspididae) are major economic pests on agriculture and forestry plants, especially on fruit trees and vegetables. Diaspididae is the largest family of scale insects with 421 accepted genera and four subfamilies recognized, viz. Ancepaspidinae Borchsenius, Furcaspidinae Balachowsky, Diaspidinae Targioni Tozzetti, and Aspidiotinae Westwood. by Normark et al. [21]. The grass-feeding species, Kuwanaspis MacGillivray, which is classified into subtribe Fioriniina Targioni Tozzetti under tribe Diaspidini Targioni Tozzetti within subfamilies Diaspidinae, are harmful to bamboo [22,23]. During our investigations of microfungi associated with bamboo in Sichuan Province, two Podonectria species and a Microcera species were isolated in association with the armored scale insect Kuwanaspis howardi (Cooley) on native bamboo plants Phyllostachys heteroclada and Pleioblastus amarus (Keng) Keng. Morphological characteristics coupled with phylogenetic analyses of the combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequence dataset support the validity of the P. kuwanaspidis X.L. Xu & C.L. Yang sp. nov. and P. novae-zelandiae Dingley and their placement in Podonectriaceae, Pleosporales. The fusarium-like species Microcera kuwanaspidis is distinguished from similar species based on the sequences’ differences, mainly in the tef1-α, acl1, act, cmdA, rpb1, and his3 regions. This is the first record of these taxa associated with scale insects in China. The taxa are compared with allied species, and comprehensive descriptions and micrographs are provided.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection and Morphological Study

During spring to autumn from 2018 to 2021, the specimens were collected from the bamboo forests located in Ya’an City and a neighboring county (Sichuan Province, China), where the environment is characterized by river valley terraces and intermountain basins and a subtropical monsoon humid climate with abundant natural resources, and it is the transition zone from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau to Chengdu Plain. Specimens documented with host, locality, time, and distribution of taxa were returned to the laboratory in suitable containers separately with the collection detail tag, and the substrate with fruiting bodies was checked following the methods described in Senanayake et al. [24]. The fungi were isolated into pure culture using single conidium obtained from sporodochia and single ascospore from ascomata parasitic on Kuwanaspis howardi following the isolation via spore suspension detailed in Chomnunti et al. [25]. The spore suspension was sucked into a Pasteur pipette, small drops were placed on isolation media (potato dextrose agar, PDA) in an incubator (20 °C). Then the plates were examined for single germinated spores under a dissecting microscope, and germinating spores were transferred separately to at least three new PDA plates. After incubation on PDA plates at 20 °C for 20 to 40 days depending on the growth rate, colonies were examined for their diameter, shape, and appearance. Ascomata and sporodochia were observed and photographed using a dissecting microscope NVT-GG (Shanghai Advanced Photoelectric Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) fitted with a VS-800C micro-digital camera (Shenzhen Weishen Times Technology Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China). Dimensions of asci, ascospores, pseudoparaphyses, hairs, ascomata wall, conidia, conidiophores, and numbers of septa were based on field samples and were photographed using an Olympus BX43 compound microscope fitted with an Olympus DP22 digital camera in association with ACDSee v3.1 software. Measurements were made using Tarosoft^® Image Frame Work v.0.9.7 (Tarosoft (R), Nontha Buri, Thailand). Lactophenol cotton blue reagent was used to observe the number of septa. The gelatinous appendage was observed in Black Indian ink. The type specimens were deposited at the Herbarium of Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China (SICAU). The ex-type cultures were deposited at the Culture Collection in Sichuan Agricultural University (SICAUCC), and MycoBank numbers are registered (http://www.MycoBank.org, accessed on 10 January 2021).

2.2. DNA Extraction, Amplification and Sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from mycelia grown on PDA at 20 °C for 30 days, using the Plant Genomic DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, China). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the partial large subunit nuclear rDNA (LSU), the partial small subunit nuclear rDNA (SSU), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α), the RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2), the large subunit of the ATP citrate lyase (acl1), the RNA polymerase II largest subunit (rpb1), β-tubulin (tub2), histone H3 (his3), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α), calmodulin (cmdA), and actin (act) regions were amplified with primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 [26], LR0R/LR5 [27], NS1/NS4 [26], EF1-983F/EF1-2218R [28], fRPB2-5F/fRPB2-7cR [29], acl1-230up/acl1-1220low, RPB1-Ac/RPB1-Cr, T1/CYLTUB1R, CYLH3F/CYLH3R, EF1-728F/EF2, CAL-228F/CAL2Rd, and ACT-512F/ACT-1Rd [19], respectively.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in 25 μL reaction mixture containing 22 μL Master Mix (Beijing TsingKe Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 1 μL DNA template, 1 μL each primer (10 μM). The amplification reactions were performed as described by Gräfenhan et al. [18], Lombard et al. [19], Dai et al. [30], and Wanasinghe et al. [31]. PCR products were sequenced at TsingKe Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China. The newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

To infer relationships of our Podonectria taxa, a combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequences dataset was used to construct the phylogenetic tree. For Microcera taxa, a combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, rpb1, rpb2, acl1, act, tub2, cmdA, and his3 sequences dataset was used. Taxa used for phylogenetic analyses were selected based on BLAST searches and recent publications (Table 1 and Table 2). DNA alignments were performed using MAFFT v.7.429 online service [32], and ambiguous regions were excluded using BioEdit version 7.0.5.3 [33]. Phylogenetic trees were inferred with maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI), according to the details described in Xu et al. [34]. The finalized alignments and trees were deposited in TreeBASE (http://www.treebase.org, accessed on 10 January 2021), submission ID: 27547 and 27549, respectively.

Table 1.

GenBank accession numbers of strains in Pleosporales and Tubeufiales used for the phylogenetic analyses of Podonectria.

Species	Strain/Voucher No.	GenBank Accession Numbers					References
		ITS	LSU	SSU	tef1-α	rpb2
Alternaria alternata	CBS 916.96 T	AF347031	DQ678082	KC584507	KC584634	KC584375	[35]
Alternaria aconidiophora	CBS 145419 T	LR133931	–	–	LR133968	LR133967	[36]
Alternaria dactylidicola	MFLUCC 15-0466 T	KY703616	KY703617	KY703618	–	KY750720	[37]
Alloleptosphaeria clematidis	MFLUCC 17-2071 T	MT310604	MT214557	MT226674	MT394736	MT394685	[38]
Astragalicola amorpha	CBS 142999 T	MF795753	MF795753	–	MF795842	MF795795	[39]
Astragalicola vasilyevae	MFLUCC 17-0832 T	MG828870	MG828986	MG829098	MG829193	MG829248	[40]
Bambusicola bambusae	MFLUCC 11-0614 T	JX442031	JX442035	JX442039	KP761722	KP761718	[41,42]
Bambusicola irregularispora	MFLUCC 11-0437 T	JX442032	JX442036	JX442040	KP761723	KP761719	[41,42]
Bambusicola massarinia	MFLUCC 11-0389 T	JX442033	JX442037	JX442041	KP761725	KP761716	[41,42]
Bambusicola splendida	MFLUCC 11-0439 T	JX442034	JX442038	JX442042	KP761726	KP761717	[41,42]
Bambusicola didymospora	MFLUCC 10-0557 T	KU940116	KU863105	KU872110	KU940188	KU940163	[30]
Bambusicola pustulata	MFLUCC 15-0190 T	KU940118	KU863107	KU872112	KU940190	KU940165	[30]
Bambusicola thailandica	MFLUCC 11-0147 T	KU940119	KU863108	KU872113	KU940191	KU940166	[30]
Bambusicola triseptatispora	MFLUCC 11-0166 T	KU940120	KU863109	–	–	KU940167	[30]
Bambusicola dimorpha	MFLUCC 13-0282 T	KY026582	KY000661	KY038354	–	KY056663	[37]
Bambusicola loculata	MFLUCC 13-0856 T	KP761732	KP761729	KP761735	KP761724	KP761715	[42]
Bambusicola sichuanensis	SICAUCC 16-0002 T	MK253473	MK253532	MK253528	MK262828	MK262830	[43]
Bambusicola subthailandica	SICAU 16-0005 T	MK253474	MK253533	MK253529	MK262829	MK262831	[43]
Boeremia coffeae	CBS 109183	GU237748	GU237943	–	KY484678	KT389566	[44]
Boeremia rhapontica	CBS 113651 T	KY484662	–	–	KY484713	–	[44]
Boeremia opuli	CGMCC 3.18354 T	KY742045	KY742199	–	–	KY742133	[44]
Boeremia linicola	CBS 116.76 T	GU237754	GU237938	–	KY484705	KT389574	[44]
Boeremia populi	CBS 100167 T	GU237707	GU237939	–	KY484706	–	[44]
Coniothyrium telephii	UTHSC DI16-189	LT796830	LN907332	–	–	LT796990	[45]
Coniothyrium chiangmaiense	MFLUCC 16-0891 T	KY568987	KY550384	KY550385	–	KY607015	[37]
Coniothyrium sidae	CBS 135108 T	KF251149	KF251653	–	KF253109	KF252158	[46]
Cucurbitaria berberidis	CBS 363.93	JF740191	GQ387606	–	–	–	[47]
Decorospora gaudefroyi	CBS 332.63	AF394541	–	AF394542	–	–	[48]
Didymella poaceicola	MFLUCC 13-0212 T	KX965726	KX954395	–	–	KX898364	[37]
Dothidotthia robiniae	MFLUCC 16-1175 T	MK751727	MK751817	MK751762	MK908017	MK920237	[49]
Epicoccum thailandicum	MFLUCC 16-0892 T	KY703619	KY703620	–	–	–	[37]
Epicoccum poaceicola	MFLUCC 15-0448 T	KX965727	KX954396	–	–	KX898365	[37]
Leptosphaeria cichorium	MFLUCC 14-1063 T	KT454720	KT454712	KT454728	–	–	[50]
Nothophoma chromolaenae	MFLUCC 17-1443 T	MT214364	MT214458	MT214410	–	–	[51]
Ophiosimulans tanaceti	MFLUCC 14-0525 T	KU738890	KU738891	KU738892	MG520910	–	[52,53]
Palmiascoma gregariascomum	MFLUCC 11-0175 T	KP744452	KP744495	KP753958	–	KP998466	[54]
Parafenestella austriaca	CBS 145262 T	MK356304	MK356304	–	MK357576	MK357532	[55]
Parafenestella alpina	CBS 145263 T	MK356302	MK356302	–	MK357574	MK357530	[55]
Paraophiobolus plantaginis	MFLUCC 17-0245 T	KY797641	KY815010	KY815012	MG520913	–	[53]
Phaeosphaeria ampeli	MFLUCC 18-1641 T	MK503797	MK503808	MK503814	MK503802	–	[56]
Podonectria coccicola	DAR 81026	KU587798	KU519419	–	–	–	[5]
Podonectria coccicola	PUcS15	KU720533	KU519420	–	–	–	[5]
Podonectria novae-zelandiae	PUcS14	KU720535	KU559551	–	–	–	[5]
Podonectria novae-zelandiae	PUcS13	KU720538	KU559548	–	–	–	[5]
Podonectria novae-zelandiae	PUcS12	KU720537	KU529802	–	–	–	[5]
Podonectria novae-zelandiae	PUcS11	KU720536	KU568479	–	–	–	[5]
Podonectria sichuanensis	SICAU 16-0003 T	MK305903	MK296471	MK296467	MK313852	MK313855	[12]
Podonectria sichuanensis	SICAUCC 21-0001	MW484988	MW462899	MW462891	MW462111	MW462118	This study
Podonectria kuwanaspidis	SICAUCC 21-0002 T	MW484989	MW462900	MW462892	MW462112	MW462119	This study
Podonectria kuwanaspidis	SICAUCC 21-0003	MW484990	MW462901	MW462893	MW462113	MW462120	This study
Podonectria novae-zelandiae	SICAUCC 21-0004	MW484991	MW462902	MW462894	MW462114	MW462121	This study
Podonectria novae-zelandiae	SICAUCC 21-0005	MW484992	MW462903	MW462895	MW462115	MW462122	This study
Podonectria kuwanaspidis	SICAUCC 21-0007	MW484994	MW462905	MW462897	MW462116	MW462123	This study
Pseudoophiobolus galii	MFLUCC 17-2257 T	MG520947	MG520967	MG520989	MG520926	–	[53]
Pseudopyrenochaeta lycopersici	CBS 306.65 T	AY649587	EU754205	–	–	LT717680	[57]
Pseudopyrenochaeta terrestris	CBS 282.72 T	LT623228	LT623216	–	–	LT623287	[57]
Sclerenchymomyces clematidis	MFLUCC 17-2180 T	MT310605	MT214558	MT226675	MT394737	MT394686	[38]
Seltsamia ulmi	CBS 143002 T	MF795794	MF795794	MF795794	MF795882	MF795836	[39]
Thyrostroma lycii	MFLUCC 16-1170 T	MK751734	MK751824	MK751769	MK908024	MK920241	[49]
Thyrostroma robiniae	MFLUCC 18-1191 T	MK751735	MK751825	MK751770	MK908025	MK920242	[49]
Tubeufia javanica	MFLUCC 12-0545 T	KJ880034	KJ880036	KJ880035	KJ880037	–	[58]
Tubeufia chiangmaiensis	MFLUCC 11-0514 T	KF301530	KF301538	KF301543	KF301557	–	[58]

Notes: The superscript T represents ex-type or ex-epitype isolates. “–” means that the sequence is missing or unavailable. New sequences are listed in bold. Abbreviations. CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, Netherlands; CGMCC: China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center; DAR: New South Wales Plant Pathology Herbarium, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW, Australia; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; PUcS: unspecified; UTHSC: Fungus Testing Laboratory of the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA; SICAUCC: Sichuan Agricultural University Culture Collection, Sichuan, China; SICAU: Herbarium of Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, China.

Table 2.

GenBank accession numbers of strains in Nectriaceae used for the phylogenetic analyses of Microcera.

Species	Strain/Voucher No.	GenBank Accession No.										References
		acl1	act	cmdA	his3	ITS	LSU	rpb1	rpb2	tef1-α	tub2
Cosmospora coccinea	CBS 341.70 T	HQ897913	KM231221	KM231398	KM231550	HQ897827	KM231692	KM232242	HQ897777	KM231947	KM232086	[18,19]
Cosmospora cymosa	CBS 762.69 T	HQ897914	KM231222	KM231399	KM231551	HQ897828	KM231693	KM232243	HQ897778	KM231948	KM232087	[18,19]
Dialonectria episphaeria	CBS 125494 = TG 2006-11	HQ897892	KM231227	KM231404	KM231556	HQ897811	KM231697	KM232248	HQ897756	KM231953	KM232092	[18,19]
Dialonectria ullevolea	CBS 125493 = TG 2007-56	HQ897918	KM231226	KM231403	KM231555	KM231821	KM231696	KM232247	HQ897782	KM231952	KM232091	[18,19]
Fusicolla acetilerea	BBA 63789 T = IMI 181488 = NRRL20827	KM231065	–	–	–	HQ897790	U88108	–	HQ897701	–	–	[18]
Fusicolla aquaeductuum	CBS 837.85 = BBA 64559 = NRRL 20865	KM231067	-	KM231406	-	KM231823	KM231699	KM232250	HQ897744	KM231955	KM232094	[19]
Fusicolla epistroma	BBA 62201 T = IMI 85601 = NRRL 20439	KM231069	–	–	–	–	AF228352	–	HQ897765	–	–	[18]
Fusicolla matuoi	CBS 581.78 = ATCC 18694 = MAFF 238445 = NRRL 20427	KM231070	KM231228	KM231405	KM231557	KM231822	KM231698	KM232249	HQ897720	KM231954	KM232093	[18,19]
Macroconia papilionacearum	CBS 125495	HQ897912	KM231233	KM231411	KM231561	HQ897826	KM231704	KM232254	HQ897776	KM231958	KM232096	[18,19]
Macroconia leptosphaeriae	CBS 717.74	KM231062	KM231236	KM231414	KM231564	KM231827	KM231707	KM232257	KM232390	JF735695	KM232099	[18,19]
Macroconia leptosphaeriae	CBS 100001 = CBS H-6030	KM231063	KM231234	KM231412	KM231562	HQ897810	KM231705	KM232255	HQ897755	KM231959	KM232097	[18,19]
Microcera coccophila	CBS 310.34 = NRRL 13962	HQ897843	KM231232	KM231410	KM231560	HQ897794	KM231703	–	HQ897705	JF740692	–	[18,19,59]
Microcera diploa	CBS 735.79 = BBA 62173 = NRRL 13966	HQ897899	–	–	–	HQ897817	–	–	HQ897763	–	–	[18]
Microcera kuwanaspidis	SICAUCC 21-0006 T	MW462125	MW462126	MW462127	MW462128	MW484993	MW462905	MW462129	MW462124	MW462117	MW462130	This study
Microcera kuwanaspidis	SICAUCC 21-0009	MZ044037	MZ044038	MZ044039	MZ044040	MZ029437	MZ029436	MZ044041	MZ044036	MZ044035	MZ044042	This study
Microcera larvarum	CBS 169.30	HQ897855	–	–	EU860049	EU860064	EU860064	–	HQ897717	–	EU860025	[18,60]
Microcera larvarum	CBS 738.79 = BBA 62239 = MUCL 19033 = NRRL 20473	KM231060	KM231230	KM231408	KM231559	KM231825	KM231701	KM232252	KM232387	KM231957	EU860026	[19,60]
Microcera larvarum	A.R. 4580 = CBS 133964	–	–	–	–	KC291751	KC291759	KC291894	–	KC291832	KC291935	[61]
Microcera rubra	CBS 638.76 T = BBA 62460 = NRRL 20475	HQ897903	KM231231	KM231409	EU860050	HQ897820	KM231702	KM232253	HQ897767	JF740696	EU860018	[18,19,60]
Pseudocosmospora rogersonii	CBS 133981 T = G.J.S. 90-56	–	–	–	–	KC291729	KC291780	KC291878	–	KC291852	KC291915	[61]
Pseudocosmospora eutypellae	CBS 133966 T = A.R. 4562	–	–	–	–	KC291721	KC291757	KC291871	–	KC291830	KC291912	[61]
Pseudocosmospora eutypae	C.H. 11-01 = CBS 133961 T	–	–	–	–	KC291735	KC291766	KC291884	–	KC291837	KC291925	[61]
Tilachlidium brachiatum	CBS 505.67	KM231076	KM231249	KM231436	–	KM231839	KM231720	KM232272	KM232415	KM231976	KM232110	[19]
Tilachlidium brachiatum	CBS 363.97	KM231077	KM231248	KM231435	KM231583	KM231838	KM231719	KM232271	KM232414	KM231975	KM232109	[19]

Notes: superscript T represents ex-type or ex-epitype isolates. “–” means that the sequence is missing or unavailable. New sequences are listed in bold. Abbreviations. A.R.: Amy Y. Rossman, USDA-ARS, MD, USA; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, U.S.A.; BBA: Julius Kühn-Institute, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Berlin and Braunschweig, Germany; CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, Netherlands; C.H.: Cesar S. Herrera, University of Maryland, MD, USA; G.J.S.: Gary J. Samuels, USDA-ARS, MD, USA; IMI: International Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, UK; MAFF: MAFF Genebank, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan; MUCL: Mycothèque de I’Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium; NRRL: Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection, USA; TG: T. Gräfenhan collection.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

Phylogenetic analyses of a combined five-gene dataset (ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2) comprised 62 taxa, and the tree is rooted with Tubeufia javanica Penz. & Sacc. (MFLUCC 12-0545) and T. chiangmaiensis Boonmee & K.D. Hyde (MFLUCC 11-0514) (Tubeufiaceae, Tubeufiales). The alignment contained 5721 characters (LSU = 1046, ITS = 821, SSU = 1176, tef1-α = 1507, rpb2 = 1171), including gaps. The best scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of −40,064.587233 is presented. The matrix had 2539 distinct alignment patterns, with 46.29% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.244598, C = 0.248213, G = 0.265992, T = 0.241197, with substitution rates AC = 1.565487, AG = 3.743698, AT = 1.774643, CG = 1.114196, CT = 7.131582, GT = 1.000000. The gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.240760, and the Tree-Length = 3.685780.

Phylogenetic trees generated from ML and BI analyses were similar in overall topologies. Phylogeny from the combined sequence data analysis indicates that all the Pleosporalean families are monophyletic with strong bootstrap support values (Figure 1). Three species grouped with taxa in Podonectria with 100% ML and 1.00 BYPP support. A species (SICAUCC 21-0004, SICAUCC 21-0005) clustered with P. novae-zelandiae in a clade with 99% ML and 1.00 BYPP statistical support. Our novel species P. kuwanaspidis constitutes a moderately supported independent lineage (82% ML/-- BYPP statistical support) between P. novae-zelandiae and P. coccicola.

Figure 1.

Phylogram generated from RAxML analysis based on ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 Scheme 70. and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP, right) equal to or greater than 0.95 are indicated at the nodes respectively. The sequences from ex-type strains are in bold. The newly generated sequence is in red.

DNA sequences of four known species of Microcera and our new taxon, M. kuwanaspidis, were used in the analyses. The combined dataset comprised 24 taxa within Nectriaceae and two outgroup taxa in Tilachlidiaceae (Table 2). The alignment contained 7447 characters (ITS = 638, LSU = 831, acl1 = 1041, act = 673, cmdA = 778, his3 = 530, rpb1 = 741, rpb2 = 874, tef1-α = 631, tub2 = 710), including gaps. The tree is rooted with Tilachlidium brachiatum (Batsch) Petch (CBS 363.97, CBS 505.67). The best scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of −50,074.064664 is presented. The matrix had 3327 distinct alignment patterns, with 28.65% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.233349, C = 0.272026, G = 0.255053, T = 0.239571, with substitution rates AC = 1.285610, AG = 3.696293, AT = 1.292257, CG = 0.967004, CT = 6.115076, GT = 1.000000. The gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.261457, and the Tree-Length = 2.372705. In the concatenated phylogenetic analyses of ML and BI, all species of Microcera analyzed clustered in a well-supported clade (ML = 100%, BYPP = 1.00) with a close affinity to Fusicolla and Macroconia (Figure 2). Microcera kuwanaspidis is related to M. coccophila in a subclade with 100% ML and 1.00 BYPP statistical support.

Figure 2.

Phylogram generated from RAxML analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1-α, rpb1, rpb2, acl1, act, tub2, cmdA, and his3 sequence data of Microcera isolates. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML, left) higher than 70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP, right) equal to or greater than 0.95 are indicated at the nodes respectively. The sequences from ex-type strains are in bold. The newly generated sequence is in red.

3.2. Taxonomy

Podonectriaceae H.T. Dao & Rossman, Mycological Progress 15(5): 47 (2016) amended.

MycoBank number: MB 815827

Type genus: Podonectria Petch, Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 7(3): 146 (1921).

Parasitic fungus on scale insects, other fungi, or substrates previously colonized by other fungi. Sexual morph: Stromata byssoid, well-developed or scant, white to brown or dark-brown. Ascomata solitary or aggregated, superficial on or immersed in the stroma, globose to subglobose, obpyriform or ovoid, cream white to light yellow, or brown to dark brown, covered with hairs or absent. The hamathecium comprises numerous reticulate, filiform, septate, branched, pseudoparaphyses. Asci 8-spored, bitunicate, long clavate to cylindric. Ascospores long clavate to long cylindric, or vermiform, multiseptate. Asexual morph: Tetracrium-like. Sporodochia formed directly on cushion-shaped, white, orange, or brown, and hard stroma. Conidiophores moniliform. Conidia usually 1–4 “arms”, narrowed toward the apex, joined at the basal cell, multiseptate.

Notes: The family Podonectriaceae was introduced to accommodate Podonectria by Dao et al. [5], in which descriptions of conidia, ascomata, asci, and ascospores were lacking. Here we emend those descriptions and the habitats of Podonectriaceae with the inclusion of fungi or substrates previously colonized by other fungi and not only scale insects [4,5,8,12]. This broadens the taxonomic concept of Podonectria, which is further supported by molecular analyses in this study.

Podonectria novae-zelandiae Dingley, Trans. & Proc. Roy. Soc. N.Z. 81: 496 (1954) (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Podonectria novae-zelandiae (SICAU 21-0005). (a,b) Ascomata and sporodochia on host substrate. (c) Section through ascoma. (d) Peridium. (e,f) Hairs covering on ascoma. (g) Pseudoparaphyses. (h) Ocular chamber. (i–k) Asci. (l–p) Ascospores. (q) Germinated ascospores. (r,s) Colonies on PDA after 18 days. Scale bars: (a,b) 200 μm, (c) 100 μm, (d) 50 μm, (e–g) 20 μm, (h) 10 μm, (i–q) 20 μm.

Figure 4.

Podonectria novae-zelandiae (SICAU 21-0004). (a–c) Sporodochia and ascomata on host substrate. (d–f) Immature conidia. (g–j) Mature conidia. (k,l) Conidiophores. (m,n) Colonies on PDA after 20 days and 60 days. (o) Germinated conidium. Scale bars: (a–c) 500 μm, (d–k) 20 μm, (l,o) 10 μm.

MycoBank number: MB 304079

Habitat associated with scale insects Kuwanaspis howardi on Phyllostachys heteroclada. Sexual morph: Stromata byssoid, brown, well-developed, and covered the scale insects. Ascomata solitary, rarely aggregated, superficial on the byssoid stroma, concomitant with sporodochia, light yellow, covered with long hairs, 150–415 μm high ($\overline{x}$ = 240 μm, n = 20), 100–350 μm wide (without hairs) ($\overline{x}$ = 192 μm, n = 30). Hairs 60–280 μm long, multiseptate, 3–6.5 μm wide, straight, or curved, abundant, hyaline, slightly narrowed toward the apex, 1–2.5 μm thick-walled (n = 30). Peridium 60–100 μm thick, usually wider at the base, composed of hyaline suborbicular cells forming textura angularis, the cells measuring 5.5–12 × 4.5–10 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 8.9 × 7.0 μm, n = 20). Hamathecium 1.5–3 μm diameter ($\overline{x}$ = 2.3 μm, n = 30), 1 μm diameter at the apex, longer than the asci, numerous, filiform, curved, septate, branched pseudoparaphyses. Asci 220–340 × 18–26 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 267 × 21 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, straight, or curved, rounded at apex. Ascospores 100–160 × 7–10 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 138 × 9 μm, n = 30), fasciculate, parallel, long-clavate, rounded at ends, multiseptate, 10–22 septa with slight constriction, curved, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Stromata hard, white to grey-brown, cushion-shaped, formed directly on host scales with 1–4 sporodochia. Sporodochia erupted, white, yellowish to grey-brown, scattered or aggregated. Conidiophores inconspicuous, short, 1–2 celled, the cells 3–7 × 4–10 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 5.0 × 7.5 μm, n = 30), usually globose, subglobose, or shortly cylindrical, attached with 1–2 conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 3–7 × 4–11 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 7.3 × 6.5 μm, n = 30), globose or ellipsoidal. Conidia usually with two and three “arms”, occasionally one and four “arms”, each “arm” varies in length and slightly divergent, 85–163 μm long ($\overline{x}$ = 117 μm, n = 70), 7–11 μm wide ($\overline{x}$ = 9 μm, n = 70) with 11–25 septa, mature conidium tapering toward the acute apex. All “arms” of single conidium joined at a basal oval or irregular cell, measuring 4–7 × 5–10 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 5.3 × 7.1 μm, n = 40).

Material examined: CHINA, Sichuan Province, Ya’an City, Lushan County (102°55′58.13″ E, 30°15′24.07″ N, Alt. 1116 m), on scale insect Kuwanaspis howardi, 10 June 2020, Xiu-lan Xu, XXL202006006 (SICAU 21-0005), living culture SICAUCC 21-0005; ibid. XXL202006005 (SICAU 21-0004), living culture SICAUCC 21-0004.

Culture characters: Conidia germinate on PDA within 12 h, and the cultures grow slowly on PDA. Colonies reach 2 cm in diameter after 25 days. Colonies from single conidia are flocculent and hard, with irregular margins. The mycelium is creamy white to light lemon yellow starting at the center but gradually becoming brown to dark brown after 20 days. Aerial hyphae cluster and raise straightly, measuring 2–3 μm diam. Conidia develop on small, sparsely distributed mycelial clumps after two months. Conidiophores moniliform, branched, multi-celled, and longer than those in nature. Conidia commonly have three “arms”, occasionally two and four “arms”, rarely one and five “arms”, each “arm” with 17–22 septa, measuring 115–145 μm long, 6.5–10 μm wide ($\overline{x}$ = 128 × 7.9 μm, n = 30). Ascospores germinate on PDA within 12 h, and the cultures grow slowly on PDA. Colonies reach 1 cm in diameter after 20 days. Colonies from single ascospores are cottony, with regular margin; the mycelium is creamy white to yellow; and the back of colonies is brown, with concentric rings.

Notes: Here, we follow the recommendation of Rossman et al. [62] by adopting Podonectria over Tetracrium. The asexual morph of P. novae-zelandiae was reported by Dao et al. [5], and was supported with morphology and molecular data. Our observations agree with the descriptions provided by Rossman [4] and Dao et al. [5]. Nucleotide comparison of ITS and LSU (SICAUCC 21-0005) reveals high similarity to P. novae-zelandiae (isolate PUcS13, similarities = 473/476 (99%), 0 gaps (0%); similarities = 517/518 (99%), 0 gaps (0%), respectively) in Dao et al. [5]; however, the latter lack SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 sequences for further comparisons. The conidia produced here in culture were similar to those on scale insects in the field.

Podonectria kuwanaspidis X.L. Xu & C.L. Yang sp. nov. (Figure 5)

Figure 5.

Podonectria kuwanaspidis (SICAU 21-0002, holotype). (a) Ascomata on or around the scalehost (red arrow). (b) Aggregated ascomata. (c) Solitary ascomata. (d) Section through ascoma. (e) Peridium. (f) Hairs covering ascoma. (g) Pseudoparaphyses. (h–k) Asci. (l–n,q–u) Ascospores. (o,p) Colonies on PDA after 25 days and 50 days. (v,w) Germinated ascospores. Scale bars: (a) 500 μm, (b,c) 200 μm, (d) 100 μm, (e) 50 μm, (f–n) 20 μm, (q–w) 20 μm.

MycoBank number: MB 838465

Etymology: In reference to the generic name for the associated scale insect.

Holotype: SICAU 21-0002.

Habitat associated with scale insects Kuwanaspis howardi on Phyllostachys heteroclada. Sexual morph: Stromata byssoid, white or brown, well-developed and covering the scale insects, or forming a thin, white, and byssoid layer, which spreads out from the scale over the stem. Ascomata solitary to aggregated, superficial on byssoid stroma around the scale hosts, or extending far beyond the scale byssoid stroma, globose to subglobose, creamy white to dirty white, covered with hairs, 200–590 μm high ($\overline{x}$ = 424 μm, n = 20), 140–600 μm wide ($\overline{x}$ = 346 μm, n = 70). Hairs 30–120 μm long, 0–4 septa, 8–16 μm wide at the base, 2–7 μm wide at the apex, abundant, hyaline, distinctly narrowed toward the apex, 2–4.5 μm thick-walled (n = 40). Ostiole 40–100 μm wide. Peridium 40–170 μm thick ($\overline{x}$ = 72 μm, n = 30), usually wider at the base, composed of hyaline elongated cells forming textura prismatica to textura angularis, becoming globose toward outside, the cells measuring 6.5–15× 8–20 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 10 × 14 μm, n = 30) μm. Hamathecium 1.5–3.5 μm diameter ($\overline{x}$ = 2.2 μm, n = 40) at the base, 1 μm diameter at the apex, longer than the asci, numerous, filiform, curved, septate, branched pseudoparaphyses. Asci 185–250 × 15–25 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 219 × 20 μm, n = 40), 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, straight or curved, rounded at apex, shortly pedicellate. Ascospores 150–240 × 5–7 μm ($\overline{x}$ = 199 × 5.8 μm, n = 40), fasciculate, parallel or spiral, broadly filiform, cylindrical to long fusiform, elongate, rounded at ends, multiseptate, 16–31 septa without constriction, usually tapering toward the base, curved, hyaline, smooth. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Material examined: CHINA, Sichuan Province, Ya’an City, Lushan County (102°55′58.13″ E, 30°15′24.07″ N, Alt. 1116 m), on scale insect Kuwanaspis howardi, 10 June 2020, Xiu-lan Xu, XXL202006002 (SICAU 21-0002, holotype), ex-type culture, SICAUCC 21-0002; ibid. XXL202006003 (SICAU 21-0003, paratype), living culture SICAUCC 21-0003. ibid. Yucheng District, Kongping Township (103°2′59.87″ E, 29°50′8.56″ N, Alt. 1133 m), on scale insect Kuwanaspis howardi, 19 September 2018, Xiu-lan Xu, YCL201810014 (SICAU 21-0007, paratype), living culture SICAUCC 21-0007.

Culture characters: Ascospores germinating on PDA within 12 h, and the cultures grow slowly on PDA. Colonies reach 2 cm in diameter after 25 days. Colonies from single ascospores are cottony, cling to the medium, with regular margin; the mycelium is creamy white to pale yellow but gradually becomes pale brown after 30 days.

Notes: This new taxon resembles species of Podonectria, in having superficial, bright, or lightly colored fruiting bodies and hairs obscuring the outer wall of ascoma. Morphologically Podonectria kuwanaspidis is comparable with P. novae-zelandiae. It has shorter (30–120 vs. 60–280 μm) and thicker-walled hairs (2–4.5 vs.1–2.5 μm), longer and narrower ascospores (150–240 × 5–7 vs. 100–160 × 7–10 μm). The ITS base-pair comparison between Podonectria kuwanaspidis (SICAUCC 21-0002) and phylogenetically affiliated P. sichuanensis (SICAU 16-0003) reveals 15% (including 20 gaps, 4%) nucleotide differences; the nucleotide differences in the SSU, LSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 region between them are 1% (0 gaps, 0%), 3% (5 gaps, 0%), 4% (0 gaps, 0%), and 10% (0 gaps, 0%), respectively. Hence, we describe our collection as a new species in Podonectria, as recommended by Jeewon and Hyde [63].

Nectriaceae Tul. & C. Tul., Select. fung. carpol. (Paris) 3:3 (1865)

Microcera Desm., Annls Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 3 10:359 (1848)

Microcera kuwanaspidis X.L. Xu & C.L. Yang sp. nov. (Figure 6)

Figure 6.

Microcera kuwanaspidis (SICAU 21-0006, holotype). (a,b) Stromata and sporodochia on host substrate. (c–e) Conidiophore with developing macroconidia. (f) Germinated conidium. (g–l) Macroconidia. (m) Colonies on PDA after 12 days. Scale bars: (a,b) 200 μm, (c–e) 50 μm, (f–l) 20 μm.

MycoBank number: MB 838464

Etymology: In reference to the generic name for the associated scale insect.

Holotype: SICAU 21-0006.

Habitat associated with scale insects Kuwanaspis howardi on bamboo. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Stromata 500–690 μm long, 410–600 μm wide ($\overline{x}$ = 614 × 524 μm, n = 20), ellipsoid, orange-red, completely covering a single scale insect, or absent. Sporodochia 190–280 μm long, 150–300 μm wide ($\overline{x}$ = 240 × 227 μm, n = 20), formed singly on the margin of the stroma, or rarely in groups of one to three on the margin of the scale covers. Conidiophores with developing macroconidia form a pink upright mass. Macroconidia (80–)95–120 μm long × 6.5–8.5 ($\overline{x}$ = 107 × 7.3 μm, n = 20) μm wide, hyaline, cylindrical, slightly curved, slender toward each end, 3–8 septate, mostly 5–6–7 septate, difficult to distinguish apical cell and basal cell. Microconidia and chlamydospores were not observed.

Material examined: CHINA, Sichuan Province, Ya’an City, Lushan County (102°55′58.13″ E, 30°15′24.07″ N, Alt. 1116 m), on scale insect Kuwanaspis howardi on Phyllostachys heteroclada, 10 June 2020, Xiu-lan Xu, XXL202006007 (SICAU 21-0006, holotype), ex-type culture SICAUCC 21-0006, additional GenBank Number: SSU = MW462896; CHINA, Sichuan Province, Meishan City, Hongya County (103°14′2.64″ E, 29°41′53.07″ N, Alt. 538 m), on scale insect Kuwanaspis howardi on Pleioblastus amarus, 9 March 2021, Chun-lin Yang, YCL202103001 (SICAU 21-0009, paratype), living culture SICAUCC 21-0009, additional GenBank Number: SSU = MZ029435.

Culture characters: Colonies from a single macroconidium on PDA grow slowly and reach approximately 2.2 cm in diameter after 12 days at 25 °C, circular, flat, whitish to bright orange with white mycelium on the surface forming concentric circles, and the back of colonies is bright orange.

Notes: Distinguished from the red-headed fungus Microcera coccophila [18,64], in which the sporodochium is usually formed in groups on margin of dead scale or their covers accompanied with perithecia surround the edge of scale covers. However, this new species has distinct stroma covering the host, with a single sporodochium at the edge and without perithecia being discovered. Furthermore, although they are similar in size, Microcera kuwanaspidis is different from M. coccophila in numbers of septa (3–8 vs. 7–9). Microcera kuwanaspidis clusters with M. coccophila (CBS 310.34) with 100% ML and 1.00 BYPP support; however, striking base-pair differences are noted, viz. 1% (0 gaps, 0%), 1% (0 gaps, 0%), 1% (0 gaps, 0%), 13% (23 gaps, 4%), 4% (0 gaps, 0%), 3% (0 gaps, 0%), 5% (3 gaps, 0%), and 9% (6 gaps, 1%) in the ITS, LSU, rpb2, tef1-α, acl1, act, cmdA, and his3 DNA sequence data, respectively. According to the guidelines of Jeewon and Hyde [63], our collection is proposed as a new species.

4. Discussion

Mycologists have questioned the exact familial placement of Podonectria since the beginning of its establishment. Dingley [3] placed the genus in Clavicipitaceae (Hypocreales). Rossman transferred it into the Pleosporaceae (Pleosporales) due to its bitunicate asci rather than the unitunicate asci found in Hypocreales [4,7]. Barr transferred Podonectria to Tubeufiaceae [65], which was erected [66] to accommodate pleosporaceous taxa that are typically hyper saprobic on other fungi or substrates previously colonized by other fungi, hyperparasitic on foliicolous fungi, parasitic on scale insects, or occasionally parasitic on living leaves. This treatment was followed by subsequent authors [9,67,68,69]. However, Tubeufiaceae, which was comprehensively reviewed by Boonmee et al. [70], was accommodated in a new order, Tubeufiales [58]. This placement was followed by Wijayawardene et al. [71,72] and Hongsanan et al. [73]. However, Dao et al. [5] proposed Podonectriaceae, a new family in Pleosporales, to accommodate this genus, which was confirmed by ITS and LSU data. This placement was supported by Yang et al. [12], in which Podonectria sichuanensis was identified based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses. Based on the phylogenetic results of combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, and rpb2 data in this current study, we confirm Podonectriaceae as an accepted family in the suborder Pleosporineae [49]. Podonectriaceae is phylogenetically closely related to Pseudopyrenochaetaceae that has been established to accommodate two species, viz. Pseudopyrenochaeta lycopersici and P. terrestris [57]. However, the two families are morphologically distinct. Pseudopyrenochaetaceae has pycnidial conidiomata, filiform conidiophores, and aseptate, cylindrical to allantoid conidia, whereas Podonectriaceae comprises sporodochial conidiomata, moniliform or inconspicuous conidiophores, and 1–4 armed, multiseptated conidia. In addition, the coelomycete genera Tetranacrium that has septate tetraradiate conidia [74,75] was documented as the anamorph associated with Podonectria gahnia according to substrate observation [4]. However, the association is somewhat confused, as it lacks further phylogenetic investigations and taxonomic studies. Identical molecular sequences of Podonectria novae-zelandiae in our study confirmed the link between the sexual morphs and asexual morphs in Tetracrium. Podonectria was reported to be associated with scale insects on various hosts in previous studies [1,4,5,58]. In this paper, we isolated Podonectria sichuanensis (SICAUCC 21-0001) on the ascomata of Neostagonosporella sichuanensis in our sampling site and confirm that the Podonectria species are not only parasitic on scale insects but also on other fungi or substrates previously colonized by other fungi [12]. According to published studies, most species of Podonectria are associated with armored scale insects, in addition to being associated with the mostly reported hosts Citrus aurantium L. and C. nobilis Lour. (Rutaceae) [1,4] and the known host plants associated with Podonectria are Calluna vulgaris Salisb. (Ericaceae), Gahnia setifolia (A. Rich) Hook.f., G. xanthocarpa (Hook.f.) Hook. f. (Cyperaceae), Juniperus bermudiana L. (Cupressaceae), Olearia rani Druce (Asteraceae), Phyllostachys heteroclada (Poaceae) and Podocarpus ferrugineus G. Benn. ex D. Don (Podocarpaceae) [3,4,5,12].

Gräfenhan et al. [18] reported an association of Microcera to Fusarium, Cladosterigma Pat., Mycogloea L.S. Olive, Tetracrium Henn., and accepted four species in Microcera. Nowadays, taxonomic concepts based on multi-gene phylogenetic inference have provided a deeper understanding of phylogenetic relationships than those based on individual gene regions [76,77,78,79]. Recently, combined ITS-LSU-tef1-α-acl1-act-cmdA-his3-rpb1-rpb2-tub2 datasets were used to clarify intraspecific and intergeneric relationships within Nectriaceae [19], and combined ITS-LSU-tef1-α-cmdA-rpb2-tub2 datasets were similarly used for Hypocreales [80]. In this paper, Microcera kuwanaspidis can be distinguished from M. coccophila and is established as new species on account of base-pair differences, especially in the tef1-α (13%), acl1 (4%), act (3%), cmdA (5%), and his3 (9%). The Microcera species have been mostly reported associated with armored scale insects on citrus (Rutaceae), viz. Aonidiella aurantii, A. citrina, Lepidosaphes beckii, Unaspis citri, and Quadraspidiotus perniciosus on Pyrus communis, Prunus domestica and P. cerasus (Rosaceae), as well associated with nut scale Eulecanium tiliae (Hemiptera: Coccidae) on Salix sp. (Salicaceae) and Fraxinus excelsior (Oleaceae), and an unknown scale insect on Broussonetia kazinoki × B. papyrifera (Moraceae), Laurus nobilis (Lauraceae), Citrus maxima (Rutaceae), and apple trees [18,60,64].

In China, the entomopathogenic fungi associated with scale insects was mainly focused on commercial Citrus plants in the 1990s. Verticillium lecanii (Zimm) Viegas is the most common fungus that is parasitic on scale insects on Citrus since its discovery from Guizhou Province in 1982 [81]. Subsequently, Aschersonia duplex Berk., Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill., Fusarium juruanum Henn., F. moniliforme Sheld., Microcera coccophila, Nigrospora sphaerica (Sacc) Mason, and Podonectria coccicola have also been reported to be associated with the scale insects on citrus [82,83,84]. Microcera and Podonectria were commonly encountered on scale insects within tree canopies and occurred throughout the year but were more noticeable under wet and humid conditions [5,64,85,86], consistent with the observations in this study. Presently, Microcera coccophila and Podonectria coccicola have been the most commonly and worldwide recorded species on scale insects, especially on orange trees [1,4,7,85,86,87,88,89]. This paper provides new records for three entomopathogenic fungi, Podonectria kuwanaspidis, P. novae-zelandiae, and Microcera kuwanaspidis on armored insect scale from bamboo in China. According to the field observation from 2015 to 2020, the three species are commonly associated with Kuwanaspis howardi on native bamboo, especially on Phyllostachys heteroclada, and they effectively cause the scale insect hosts to be infected, which ultimately results in death. As documented by Rossman [4] and Dao et al. [64], the role of entomopathogens in the biological control of destructive scale insects on citrus trees was usually controlled by chemical sprays. These entomopathogenic fungi should be further screened to assess their potential for commercial development as biological control agents.

Author Contributions

X.-L.X. and C.-L.Y.: conceptualization. X.-L.X.: data curation. X.-L.X. and C.-L.Y.: formal analysis, methodology, and writing—original draft. X.-L.X. and Q.-G.X.: funding acquisition. X.-L.X., C.-L.Y., Q.Z. and Y.-C.L.: investigation. Q.-G.X. and Y.-G.L.: project administration. C.-L.Y.: supervision. C.-L.Y., R.J., S.S.N.M., D.N.W. and K.D.H.: writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2019040509).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in the NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), MycoBank (http://www.MycoBank.org) and TreeBASE (http://www.treebase.org) (all accessed on 18 July 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.