Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 29;13(8):1489. doi: 10.3390/v13081489

Table 4.

Test set to validate the atom-based QSAR model for anti-preS1 activity. Listed are experimentally determined binding affinities (−log (IC50 M)) of ligands and predicted binding affinity by the resulting QSAR model. Error describes the difference between the experimentally determined and the predicted binding affinity. Previous descriptions of the compounds as NTCP inhibitors are referenced. As an exception, the arylmethylamino “steroid” compounds are introduced here as novel NTCP inhibitors for the first time.

Ligand Name Binding Affinity Prediction Error
Ciglitazone [35] 6.000 4.570 −1.430
Betulinic acid [13] 5.699 4.677 −1.022
20,29-Dihydrobetulin [13] 5.456 4.815 −0.641
3-O-(3,3-Dimethylglutaroyl)betulinic acid [13] 5.398 5.073 −0.325
3,28-Di-O-acetyl-29-hydroxybetulin [13] 5.097 4.433 −0.664
Saquinavir [36] 5.097 4.349 −0.748
Emodin [39] 5.046 4.845 −0.201
Ginkgolic acid 13:0 [39] 4.959 4.496 −0.462
S985852 [14] 4.854 4.774 −0.080
Pioglitazone [35] 4.770 4.888 0.119
Nitrendipine [37] 4.745 4.390 −0.354
Glyburide [37] 4.678 4.161 −0.517
Lupenone [13] 4.658 4.398 −0.259
Betulonoyl dimethyl-L-aspartate [13] 4.638 4.300 −0.338
3-Oxoallobetulin [13] 4.509 4.228 −0.281
Steroid 6c [31] 4.432 4.040 −0.392
Steroid 7s [31] 4.420 4.410 −0.010
Raloxifene [37] 4.319 4.376 0.057
Lupeol [37] 4.292 4.497 0.204
Steroid 1s [31] 4.237 3.881 −0.356
3,28-Di-O-(dihydrocinnamoyl)betulin [13] 4.125 4.902 0.777
A000289041 [14] 4.051 4.708 0.657
Nifedipine [37] 4.018 4.463 0.445
Steroid 2c [31] 3.900 4.002 0.102
Steroid 2s [31] 3.666 4.075 0.410
Steroid 2o [31] 3.600 4.176 0.576