Skip to main content
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment logoLink to Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
. 2021 Aug 24;17:2803–2809. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S321778

High Uric Acid Level Predicts Early Neurological Deterioration in Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Xiuqun Gong 1,*, Zeyu Lu 2,*, Xiwu Feng 3,*, Kang Yuan 4, Mei Zhang 1, Xiaosi Cheng 1, Min Xue 1, Liang Yu 1, Jun Lu 5,6,, Chuanqing Yu 1,
PMCID: PMC8403016  PMID: 34465996

Abstract

Objective

Increased level of serum uric acid (UA) is often considered a risk factor for ischemic stroke. However, there are limited data on the association between UA and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed to examine the connection between UA and early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with ICH.

Methods

This is a prospective observational study. Patients with ICH were enrolled from January 2017 to December 2020. END was diagnosed as the Canadian Stroke Scale (CSS) score decreased ≥1 points between admission and 48 hours. UA was measured at admission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between serum UA and END.

Results

Of the 498 enrolled patients, 132 (26.5%) were developed with END. Patients with END had a significantly higher level of serum UA (332 vs 270 µmol/L, P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with the highest quartile of UA level had an OR of 3.256 (95% CI: 1.849–5.734, P < 0.001) for END compared with those with the lowest quartile of UA level. After adjusting for major confounders, the highest UA quartile remained as an independent predictor for END (OR = 2.282, 95% CI: 1.112–4.685, P = 0.013).

Conclusion

Higher serum UA level was independently associated with END in patients with ICH; therefore, intervention to lower UA level may be worth considering.

Keywords: early neurological deterioration, intracerebral hemorrhage, uric acid

Introduction

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 10–30% of all strokes and is the leading cause of stroke-related death and disability.1,2 There is compelling evidence from preclinical and clinical research that ICH outcome is strongly affected by a multitude of variables associated with metabolism,3,4 inflammation5,6 and drug actions.7 All these factors may act at the site of cerebral damage and/or at systemic level, and hence, influence neurovascular recovery, secondary-induced damage and systemic complications. The early stage of ICH is extremely unstable, and about 20% of patients are prone to occur early neurological deterioration (END) within two days of onset,8 which is associated with poor prognosis.9 Accordingly, it is important to identify risk factors of END to improve clinical outcomes.

Uric acid (UA) is the final product of purine metabolism in the body. It has been proven that hyperuricemia is related to gout, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke.10–16 In addition, hyperuricemia potentially leads to poor outcome, increased symptomatic ICH and mortality in ischemic stroke.17–19

Based on the neurologically damaging effect of hyperuricemia, we speculate that it may play a part in END in patients with ICH. However, the association between UA and END in patients with ICH has not been assessed to date. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the relationship between serum UA levels and END in patients with ICH.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

Patients with ICH were enrolled consecutively from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology from January 2017 to December 2020 in this prospective observational study. Patients were included if they: (1) were diagnosed with ICH verified by CT scans within 24 h from symptom onset; (2) aged ≥ 18 years; (3) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≥ 9. The patients were excluded if they: (1) had secondary hemorrhage as a result of tumor, trauma, vascular malformation, aneurysm, hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarct and blood coagulation abnormalities; (2) did not re-examine brain CT within 48 hours; (3) underwent intracranial hematoma removal or cerebrospinal fluid drainage within 48 hours; (4) had severe heart, renal or liver diseases. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology. All participants signed an informed consent form.

Clinical Data

Demographic characteristics, medical history and clinical variables were all collected from medical records. Stroke severity was assessed using the Canadian Stroke Scale (CSS) score.20 The extent of consciousness was determined by the GCS score. Fasting blood samples were collected in the next morning for UA, other biochemical indicators and routine blood tests. Serum UA level was measured by uric acid oxidase reagent on a Dax analyzer (Bayer-Technicon). Hematoma expansion was defined as an increase in ICH volume on follow-up CT scans of either 6 mL or >33%.9 END was diagnosed as the CSS score decreased ≥ 1 points between admission and 48 hours.8

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were presented as numbers (percentages). Independent t test, Mann–Whitney U-test, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis H-test as appropriate were employed for continuous variables. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical data. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between categorical serum UA levels and END. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 was further adjusted for variables with P < 0.1 in univariate analysis. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The pattern and magnitude of associations between UA and END was evaluated using a restricted cubic spline with 4 knots (at 5th, 35th, 65th, 95th) adjusted for covariates as in model 2. Results were considered as statistically significant if two-sided P < 0.05. The R software package version 4.0 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) was utilized for restricted cubic spline test, while SPSS 22.0 (IBM, New York, USA) was adopted for other statistical analyses.

Results

From January 2017 to December 2020, a total of 632 patients diagnosed with ICH were admitted to the Department of Neurology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology, of them, 134 were excluded according to the exclusion criteria: secondary hemorrhage (n = 28), did not re-examine brain CT within 48 hours (n = 37), underwent intracranial hematoma removal or cerebrospinal fluid drainage within 48 hours (n = 38) or severe heart, renal or liver diseases (n = 31). Finally, 498 patients were enrolled in our analysis. Most patients were men (64.7%). The median age of the enrolled patients was 66 (54–76) years. END occurred in 132 patients (26.5%).

Table 1 illustrates the patients’ demographic characteristics, clinical data and laboratory data according to the presence or absence of END. Compared with subjects without END, those with END had higher proportions of concurrent ventricular hemorrhage (P = 0.012) and hematoma expansion (P = 0.005), higher baseline hematoma volume (P < 0.001), baseline GCS score (P < 0.001) and CSS score (P = 0.003), higher levels of homocysteine (P = 0.030), creatinine (P = 0.007) and UA (P < 0.001).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Participants with or without END

Variables Total (n = 498) With END (n = 132) Without END (n = 366) P value
Age, years 66.0 (54.0–76.0) 65.5 (54.0–76.0) 66.0 (54.8–76.0) 0.796
Gender, Male, n (%) 322 (64.7) 92 (69.7) 230 (62.8) 0.158
Medical history, n (%)
 Hypertension 388 (77.9) 106 (80.3) 282 (77.0) 0.440
 Diabetes 106 (21.3) 28 (21.2) 78 (21.3) 0.981
 Hyperlipidemia 150 (30.1) 42 (31.8) 108 (29.5) 0.620
 Coronary heart disease 39 (7.8) 11 (8.3) 28 (7.7) 0.802
 Atrial fibrillation 16 (3.2) 2 (1.5) 14 (3.8) 0.197
 Prior stroke 152 (30.5) 43 (32.6) 109 (29.8) 0.550
 Smoking 127 (25.5) 37 (28.0) 90 (24.6) 0.437
 Drinking 114 (22.9) 33 (25.0) 81 (22.1) 0.501
Medication history, n (%)
 Antihypertensive 221 (44.4) 66 (50.0) 155 (42.3) 0.129
 Antiplatelet 105 (21.1) 34 (25.8) 71 (19.4) 0.125
 Anticoagulant 3 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 3 (0.8) 0.569
 Statin 88 (17.7) 29 (22.0) 59 (16.1) 0.131
Hematoma location, n (%)
 Lobe 54 (10.8) 16 (12.1) 38 (10.4) 0.582
 Basal ganglia 274 (55.0) 73 (55.3) 201 (54.9) 0.939
 Thalamus 114 (22.9) 34 (25.8) 80 (21.9) 0.361
 Cerebellum 39 (7.8) 6 (4.5) 33 (9.0) 0.101
 Brainstem 17 (3.4) 4 (3.0) 13 (3.6) 1.000
Concurrent ventricular hemorrhage, n (%) 112 (22.5) 40 (30.3) 72 (19.7) 0.012
Baseline hematoma volume, mL 12 (8–18) 15 (12–21) 11 (7–16) <0.001
Hematoma expansion, n (%) 79 (15.9) 31 (23.5) 48 (13.1) 0.005
Clinical characteristics
 Body temperature, °C 36.6 (36.4–36.8) 36.6 (36.5–36.8) 36.5 (36.3–36.8) 0.243
 Time from onset to admission, h 3.5 (2.0–6.0) 3.0 (2.0–7.8) 3.5 (2.0–6.0) 0.918
 Time from onset to first CT, h 3.4 (2.3–6.4) 3.4 (2.4–7.2) 3.5 (2.3–5.5) 0.837
 Baseline SBP, mmHg 165 (150–183) 170 (150–190) 164 (149–180) 0.189
 Baseline DBP, mmHg 100 (88–110) 100 (90–110) 100 (86–110) 0.104
 Baseline GCS score 15 (14–15) 15 (14–15) 15 (15–15) <0.001
 Baseline CSS score 7.0 (5.0–8.0) 6.5 (5.0–7.5) 7.0 (5.0–8.0) 0.003
Laboratory data
 Leukocyte, ×109/L 7.48 (5.92–9.34) 7.92 (6.54–9.46) 7.39 (5.69–9.30) 0.087
 Neutrophil, ×109/L 5.45 (4.00–7.32) 5.94 (4.56–7.28) 5.34 (3.89–7.39) 0.068
 Hemoglobin, g/L 129 (119–142) 131 (120–143) 129 (119–142) 0.235
 C-reactive protein, mg/L 2.0 (0.9–4.0) 2.0 (1.0–4.0) 2.0 (0.9–4.9) 0.503
 Plasma fibrinogen, g/L 2.80 (2.35–3.31) 2.77 (2.33–3.16) 2.82 (2.39–3.35) 0.235
 Homocysteine, µmol/L 12.4 (9.0–16.5) 14.1 (10.0–18.2) 12.2 (8.8–16.0) 0.030
 Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.1 (3.5–4.9) 4.1 (3.3–5.0) 4.1 (3.5–4.8) 0.931
 Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.3 (0.9–1.8) 1.3 (1.0–2.1) 1.3 (0.9–1.7) 0.134
 HDL, mg/dL 1.2 (0.9–1.4) 1.2 (1.0–1.4) 1.2 (0.9–1.4) 0.965
 LDL, mg/dL 2.6 (2.1–3.1) 2.6 (2.0–3.0) 2.5 (2.1–3.1) 0.920
 Serum glucose, mmol/L 5.5 (4.8–6.7) 5.6 (4.8–6.9) 5.5 (4.8–6.7) 0.607
 Blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L 4.8 (3.9–5.8) 4.8 (4.0–5.9) 4.8 (3.9–5.7) 0.503
 Creatinine, µmol/L 88 (76–98) 91 (77–105) 86 (76–96) 0.007
 UA, µmol/L 281 (224–349) 332 (245–408) 270 (220–328) <0.001

Abbreviations: CSS, Canadian Stroke Scale; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; END, early neurological deterioration; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; UA, uric acid.

Table 2 shows that the ascending quantiles of UA was associated with male sex (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.001), smokers (P = 0.033), alcohol drinkers (P < 0.001), previous use of antihypertensive drugs (P = 0.018), higher rates of concurrent ventricular hemorrhage (P = 0.041) and hematoma expansion (P = 0.030), higher baseline hematoma (P = 0.033), higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure (both P < 0.001), higher prevalence of END (P < 0.001), higher levels of homocysteine (P = 0.008), triglycerides (P < 0.001), blood urea nitrogen (P < 0.001) and creatinine (P < 0.001). Also, patients with higher UA were younger (P = 0.001).

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of Participants According to UA Quartiles

Variables UA (µmol/L) P value for Trend
Q1 (≤224, n=126) Q2 (224–281, n=126) Q3 (281–349, n=125) Q4 (>349, n=121)
Age, years 67.0 (60.0–77.0) 70.0 (55.8–79.0) 63.0 (52.5–72.5) 64.0 (51.0–72.0) 0.001
Gender, Male, n (%) 52 (41.3) 81 (64.3) 84 (67.2) 105 (86.8) <0.001
Medical history, n (%)
 Hypertension 82 (65.1) 106 (84.1) 96 (76.8) 104 (86.0) <0.001
 Diabetes 35 (27.8) 25 (19.8) 26 (20.8) 20 (16.5) 0.173
 Hyperlipidemia 29 (23.0) 37 (29.4) 42 (33.6) 42 (34.7) 0.173
 Coronary heart disease 10 (7.9) 10 (7.9) 10 (8.0) 9 (7.4) 0.998
 Atrial fibrillation 4 (3.2) 6 (4.8) 2 (1.6) 4 (3.3) 0.568
 Prior stroke 35 (27.8) 45 (35.7) 37 (29.6) 35 (28.9) 0.523
 Smoking 22 (17.5) 32 (25.4) 32 (25.6) 41 (33.9) 0.033
 Drinking 17 (13.5) 21 (16.7) 31 (24.8) 45 (37.2) <0.001
Medication history, n (%)
 Antihypertensive 44 (34.9) 53 (42.1) 58 (46.4) 66 (54.5) 0.018
 Antiplatelet 26 (20.6) 30 (23.8) 28 (22.4) 21 (17.4) 0.633
 Anticoagulant 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 0.796
 Statin 17 (13.5) 21 (16.7) 25 (20.0) 25 (20.7) 0.422
Hematoma location, n (%)
 Lobe 14 (11.1) 11 (8.7) 18 (14.4) 11 (9.1) 0.456
 Basal ganglia 71 (56.3) 75 (59.5) 62 (49.6) 66 (54.5) 0.454
 Thalamus 28 (22.2) 25 (19.8) 29 (23.2) 32 (26.4) 0.666
 Cerebellum 9 (7.1) 14 (11.1) 9 (7.2) 7 (5.8) 0.435
 Brainstem 4 (3.2) 1 (0.8) 7 (5.6) 5 (4.1) 0.200
Concurrent ventricular hemorrhage, n (%) 21 (16.7) 26 (20.6) 27 (21.6) 38 (31.4) 0.041
Baseline hematoma volume, mL 10 (7–15) 13 (8–17) 12 (8–18) 13 (10–20) 0.033
Hematoma expansion, n (%) 11 (8.7) 18 (14.3) 24 (19.2) 26 (21.5) 0.030
END, n (%) 25 (19.8) 24 (19.0) 29 (23.2) 54 (44.6) <0.001
Clinical characteristics
 Body temperature, °C 36.6 (36.4–36.8) 36.6 (36.4–36.8) 36.7 (36.4–36.8) 36.5 (36.3–36.7) 0.261
 Time from onset to admission, h 3.5 (2.0–6.0) 3.0 (2.0–7.8) 3.5 (2.0–6.0) 0.487
 Time from onset to first CT, h 3.0 (2.0–7.3) 4.0 (2.8–7.0) 4.0 (2.0–6.0) 3.0 (2.0–6.0) 0.705
 Baseline SBP, mmHg 160 (142–175) 167 (150–185) 161 (145–180) 172 (152–192) <0.001
 Baseline DBP, mmHg 95 (80–105) 100 (85–108) 100 (90–110) 100 (94–116) <0.001
 Baseline GCS score 15 (14–15) 15 (15–15) 15 (15–15) 15 (14–15) 0.065
 Baseline CSS score 6.0 (4.5–8.0) 7.0 (5.0–8.0) 7.0 (6.0–8.0) 7.0 (6.0–8.0) 0.137
Laboratory data
 Leukocyte, ×109/L 7.20 (5.62–9.16) 8.00 (5.71–9.60) 7.40 (5.90–9.22) 7.73 (6.59–9.49) 0.223
 Neutrophil, ×109/L 5.38 (3.73–7.31) 5.68 (4.05–7.76) 5.26 (3.94–7.11) 5.56 (4.16–7.05) 0.467
 Hemoglobin, g/L 126 (116–142) 129 (120–142) 132 (119–142) 132 (120–142) 0.244
 C-reactive protein, mg/L 2.0 (1.0–6.0) 2.0 (0.9–5.1) 1.7 (0.5–4.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 0.830
 Plasma fibrinogen, g/L 2.80 (2.47–3.39) 2.87 (2.42–3.33) 2.73 (2.13–3.22) 2.81 (2.39–3.29) 0.247
 Homocysteine, µmol/L 11.3 (8.6–14.7) 12.1 (9.0–16.9) 12.7 (10.3–16.0) 14.4 (10.0–18.7) 0.008
 Total cholesterol, mmol/L 4.0 (3.4–4.7) 4.1 (3.5–5.1) 4.1 (3.5–4.8) 4.3 (3.6–5.0) 0.237
 Triglyceride, mmol/L 1.0 (0.8–1.5) 1.3 (0.9–1.8) 1.3 (1.0–2.0) 1.4 (1.0–1.9) <0.001
 HDL, mg/dL 1.2 (1.0–1.4) 1.2 (1.0–1.4) 1.2 (1.0–1.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 0.309
 LDL, mg/dL 2.5 (2.0–3.0) 2.5 (2.0–3.1) 2.5 (2.0–3.0) 2.7 (2.1–3.2) 0.194
 Serum glucose, mmol/L 5.5 (4.7–7.6) 5.7 (4.9–7.2) 5.4 (4.8–6.5) 5.4 (4.7–6.3) 0.213
 Blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L 4.4 (3.5–5.0) 4.7 (3.8–5.5) 4.9 (3.9–6.0) 5.4 (4.6–6.9) <0.001
 Creatinine, µmol/L 77 (69–89) 86 (76–95) 88 (80–98) 97 (88–118) <0.001

Abbreviations: CSS, Canadian Stroke Scale; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; END, early neurological deterioration; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; UA, uric acid.

Table 3 exhibits the results of the binary logistic regression of END. In the unadjusted model, compared with the first quartile, patients with UA levels in the fourth quartile, were more likely to have END (OR 3.256, 95% CI 1.849–5.734, P < 0.001). The association remained significant after adjusting for the potential confounders (OR 2.282, 95% CI 1.112–4.685, P = 0.013).

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Model of UA and END

Quartiles of UA (µmol/L) P value
Q1 (≤224, n=126) Q2 (224–281, n=126) Q3 (281–349, n=125) Q4 (>349, n=121)
Unadjusted model Reference 0.951 (0.509–1.774) 1.220 (0.667–2.231) 3.256 (1.849–5.734) <0.001
Model 1 Reference 0.951 (0.505–1.792) 1.233 (0.664–2.288) 3.303 (1.795–6.079) <0.001
Model 2 Reference 0.823 (0.419–1.614) 1.043 (0.530–2.051) 2.282 (1.112–4.685) 0.013

Notes: Model 1: adjusted for age and sex; model 2: further adjusted for variables with P value < 0.1 in univariate analysis (concurrent ventricular hemorrhage, baseline hematoma volume, baseline GCS score, baseline CSS score, leukocyte, neutrophil, homocysteine and creatinine).

Abbreviations: CSS, Canadian Stroke Scale; END, early neurological deterioration; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; UA, uric acid.

Multiple-adjusted restricted cubic spline regression showed an ascending trend of UA (P = 0.100 for nonlinearity, as shown in Figure 1) with the risk of END.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Association of UA with risk of END. Odds ratio and 95% CI were derived from restricted cubic spline regression, with knots placed at 5th, 35th, 65th, and 95th percentiles of UA. Odds ratio was adjusted for the same variables as in model 2 (Table 3). The solid line represented the odds ratio and the dashed lines represented the 95% confidence interval.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; END, early neurological deterioration; UA, uric acid.

Discussion

This study reveals a significantly increased risk of END among ICH individuals with higher serum UA levels after adjusting for a series of potential confounders. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between UA and END in patients with ICH.

The results of previous studies on risk factors of END showed discrepancy, mainly related to the differences in diagnostic criteria and research objects. It has been reported that END was defined as a decrease in the GCS score of ≥ 3 or death within the first 72 hours,21 > 2 points increase in the NIHSS score within a 72-hour period,22 or a decrease in the CSS score of ≥ 1 points within 48 hours.8 In view of the high reliability and validity of CSS score for the assessment of neurological impairment in patients with stroke,23 and the relatively convenient scoring procedures, END was defined as the CSS score decreased ≥ 1 points between admission and 48 hours in the current research.8 In this prospective study, END occurred in 26.5% of patients with ICH, slightly higher than the previous study, which may be due to ethnic differences in the study population.8

Although the exact mechanisms between UA and END in patients with ICH remained unclear, the following might explain it. First, previous studies have shown that a higher white blood cell count is predictive of END in patients with ICH, suggesting that inflammatory response may be involved in END.8,21 Serum UA, on the other hand, promotes the release of a range of inflammatory mediators, such as neutrophils count, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-18, and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a),24,25 which may in turn lead to END. Secondly, serum UA has pro-oxidant properties by increasing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).26 Then, the increased oxidative stress level can aggravate secondary brain injury after ICH through inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy and destruction of blood–brain barrier,27 and eventually contribute to END. Last but not the least, individuals with higher levels of UA were more likely to have larger baseline hematoma volume, higher proportions of intraventricular hemorrhage and hematoma expansion, and all of which have been shown to be risk factors associated with END in patients with ICH.8,9

Some limitations should be noted in this study. First, this was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size, thereby limiting the ability to extend the finding. Secondly, the UA level was detected only once on admission, but not dynamically monitored during the study. The pattern of dynamic change of UA could provide better prognostic information. Thirdly, recent emerging lines of evidence suggest that high blood pressure variations are important predictors of the prognosis of ICH.28,29 However, our study did not take this factor into account. Finally, we had little background information, such as purine consumption, history of gout and exercise habit that would affect admission serum UA concentration.

Conclusions

In conclusion, an elevated serum UA level was independently associated with END in patients with ICH. Therefore, intervention to lower UA level may be worth considering.

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students (202010361110) and Huainan Guidance Science and Technology Plan Project (2020104).

Disclosure

All authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, et al. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:167–176. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, et al. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(1):43–53. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00266-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zarean E, Lattanzi S, Looha MA, et al. Glycemic gap predicts in-hospital mortality in diabetic patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(5):105669. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jafari M, Di Napoli M, Lattanzi S, et al. Serum magnesium level and hematoma expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Di Napoli M, Slevin M, Popa-Wagner A, et al. Monomeric c-reactive protein and cerebral hemorrhage: from bench to bedside. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1921. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lattanzi S, Cagnetti C, Provinciali L, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and neurological deterioration following acute cerebral hemorrhage. Oncotarget. 2017;8:57489–57494. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mahmoudi J, Majdi A, Lattanzi S, et al. Imidazoline receptor agonists for managing hypertension may hold promise for treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage. Curr Mol Med. 2018;18:241–251. doi: 10.2174/1566524018666180926163712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Godoy DA, Boccio A. Early neurologic deterioration in intracerebral hemorrhage: predictors and associated factors. Neurology. 2005;64:931–932; author reply 931–932. doi: 10.1212/WNL.64.5.931-a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lord AS, Gilmore E, Choi HA, et al. Time course and predictors of neurological deterioration after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2015;46:647–652. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang Q, Gong H, Lin C, et al. The prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in middle-aged and elderly people in Tibet autonomous region, china: a preliminary study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(2):e18542. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li L, Yang C, Zhao Y, et al. Is hyperuricemia an independent risk factor for new-onset chronic kidney disease?: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on observational cohort studies. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuwabara M, Hisatome I, Niwa K, et al. Uric acid is a strong risk marker for developing hypertension from prehypertension: a 5-year Japanese cohort study. Hypertension. 2018;71:78–86. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sundström J, Sullivan L, D’Agostino RB, et al. Relations of serum uric acid to longitudinal blood pressure tracking and hypertension incidence. Hypertension. 2005;45:28–33. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000150784.92944.9a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lytvyn Y, Perkins BA, Cherney DZ. Uric acid as a biomarker and a therapeutic target in diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39:239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang Y, Tian J, Zeng C, et al. Relationship between hyperuricemia and risk of coronary heart disease in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. J Int Med Res. 2017;45:254–260. doi: 10.1177/0300060516673923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang S, Liu L, Huang YQ, et al. The association between serum uric acid levels and ischemic stroke in essential hypertension patients. Postgrad Med. 2020;132:551–558. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1757924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weir CJ, Muir SW, Walters MR, et al. Serum urate as an independent predictor of poor outcome and future vascular events after acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:1951–1956. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081983.34771.D2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yuan K, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. Uric acid level and risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular treatment. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27:1048–1055. doi: 10.1111/ene.14202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Storhaug HM, Norvik JV, Toft I, et al. Uric acid is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality in the general population: a gender specific analysis from the tromsø study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13(1):115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Côté R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, et al. The Canadian neurological scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology. 1989;39:638–643. doi: 10.1212/WNL.39.5.638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun W, Peacock A, Becker J, et al. Correlation of leukocytosis with early neurological deterioration following supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:1096–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.11.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seo WK, Seok HY, Kim JH, et al. C-reactive protein is a predictor of early neurologic deterioration in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21:181–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stavem K, Lossius M, Rønning OM. Reliability and validity of the Canadian neurological scale in retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(3):286–291. doi: 10.1159/000071129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kimura Y, Yanagida T, Onda A, et al. Soluble uric acid promotes atherosclerosis via ampk (amp-activated protein kinase)-mediated inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:570–582. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ruggiero C, Cherubini A, Ble A, et al. Uric acid and inflammatory markers. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1174–1181. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kurajoh M, Fukumoto S, Yoshida S, et al. Uric acid shown to contribute to increased oxidative stress level independent of xanthine oxidoreductase activity in medcity21 health examination registry. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86962-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yao Z, Bai Q, Wang G. Mechanisms of oxidative stress and therapeutic targets following intracerebral hemorrhage. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:8815441. doi: 10.1155/2021/8815441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Andalib S, Lattanzi S, Di Napoli M, et al. Blood pressure variability: a new predicting factor for clinical outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(12):105340. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Divani AA, Liu X, Di Napoli M, et al. Blood pressure variability predicts poor in-hospital outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019;50(8):2023–2029. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES