Abstract
Objective
Increased level of serum uric acid (UA) is often considered a risk factor for ischemic stroke. However, there are limited data on the association between UA and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed to examine the connection between UA and early neurological deterioration (END) in patients with ICH.
Methods
This is a prospective observational study. Patients with ICH were enrolled from January 2017 to December 2020. END was diagnosed as the Canadian Stroke Scale (CSS) score decreased ≥1 points between admission and 48 hours. UA was measured at admission. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between serum UA and END.
Results
Of the 498 enrolled patients, 132 (26.5%) were developed with END. Patients with END had a significantly higher level of serum UA (332 vs 270 µmol/L, P < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with the highest quartile of UA level had an OR of 3.256 (95% CI: 1.849–5.734, P < 0.001) for END compared with those with the lowest quartile of UA level. After adjusting for major confounders, the highest UA quartile remained as an independent predictor for END (OR = 2.282, 95% CI: 1.112–4.685, P = 0.013).
Conclusion
Higher serum UA level was independently associated with END in patients with ICH; therefore, intervention to lower UA level may be worth considering.
Keywords: early neurological deterioration, intracerebral hemorrhage, uric acid
Introduction
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounts for 10–30% of all strokes and is the leading cause of stroke-related death and disability.1,2 There is compelling evidence from preclinical and clinical research that ICH outcome is strongly affected by a multitude of variables associated with metabolism,3,4 inflammation5,6 and drug actions.7 All these factors may act at the site of cerebral damage and/or at systemic level, and hence, influence neurovascular recovery, secondary-induced damage and systemic complications. The early stage of ICH is extremely unstable, and about 20% of patients are prone to occur early neurological deterioration (END) within two days of onset,8 which is associated with poor prognosis.9 Accordingly, it is important to identify risk factors of END to improve clinical outcomes.
Uric acid (UA) is the final product of purine metabolism in the body. It has been proven that hyperuricemia is related to gout, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke.10–16 In addition, hyperuricemia potentially leads to poor outcome, increased symptomatic ICH and mortality in ischemic stroke.17–19
Based on the neurologically damaging effect of hyperuricemia, we speculate that it may play a part in END in patients with ICH. However, the association between UA and END in patients with ICH has not been assessed to date. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the relationship between serum UA levels and END in patients with ICH.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
Patients with ICH were enrolled consecutively from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology from January 2017 to December 2020 in this prospective observational study. Patients were included if they: (1) were diagnosed with ICH verified by CT scans within 24 h from symptom onset; (2) aged ≥ 18 years; (3) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≥ 9. The patients were excluded if they: (1) had secondary hemorrhage as a result of tumor, trauma, vascular malformation, aneurysm, hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarct and blood coagulation abnormalities; (2) did not re-examine brain CT within 48 hours; (3) underwent intracranial hematoma removal or cerebrospinal fluid drainage within 48 hours; (4) had severe heart, renal or liver diseases. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology. All participants signed an informed consent form.
Clinical Data
Demographic characteristics, medical history and clinical variables were all collected from medical records. Stroke severity was assessed using the Canadian Stroke Scale (CSS) score.20 The extent of consciousness was determined by the GCS score. Fasting blood samples were collected in the next morning for UA, other biochemical indicators and routine blood tests. Serum UA level was measured by uric acid oxidase reagent on a Dax analyzer (Bayer-Technicon). Hematoma expansion was defined as an increase in ICH volume on follow-up CT scans of either 6 mL or >33%.9 END was diagnosed as the CSS score decreased ≥ 1 points between admission and 48 hours.8
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). Categorical variables were presented as numbers (percentages). Independent t test, Mann–Whitney U-test, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis H-test as appropriate were employed for continuous variables. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical data. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between categorical serum UA levels and END. Model 1 was adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 was further adjusted for variables with P < 0.1 in univariate analysis. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The pattern and magnitude of associations between UA and END was evaluated using a restricted cubic spline with 4 knots (at 5th, 35th, 65th, 95th) adjusted for covariates as in model 2. Results were considered as statistically significant if two-sided P < 0.05. The R software package version 4.0 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) was utilized for restricted cubic spline test, while SPSS 22.0 (IBM, New York, USA) was adopted for other statistical analyses.
Results
From January 2017 to December 2020, a total of 632 patients diagnosed with ICH were admitted to the Department of Neurology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Science and Technology, of them, 134 were excluded according to the exclusion criteria: secondary hemorrhage (n = 28), did not re-examine brain CT within 48 hours (n = 37), underwent intracranial hematoma removal or cerebrospinal fluid drainage within 48 hours (n = 38) or severe heart, renal or liver diseases (n = 31). Finally, 498 patients were enrolled in our analysis. Most patients were men (64.7%). The median age of the enrolled patients was 66 (54–76) years. END occurred in 132 patients (26.5%).
Table 1 illustrates the patients’ demographic characteristics, clinical data and laboratory data according to the presence or absence of END. Compared with subjects without END, those with END had higher proportions of concurrent ventricular hemorrhage (P = 0.012) and hematoma expansion (P = 0.005), higher baseline hematoma volume (P < 0.001), baseline GCS score (P < 0.001) and CSS score (P = 0.003), higher levels of homocysteine (P = 0.030), creatinine (P = 0.007) and UA (P < 0.001).
Table 1.
Variables | Total (n = 498) | With END (n = 132) | Without END (n = 366) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age, years | 66.0 (54.0–76.0) | 65.5 (54.0–76.0) | 66.0 (54.8–76.0) | 0.796 |
Gender, Male, n (%) | 322 (64.7) | 92 (69.7) | 230 (62.8) | 0.158 |
Medical history, n (%) | ||||
Hypertension | 388 (77.9) | 106 (80.3) | 282 (77.0) | 0.440 |
Diabetes | 106 (21.3) | 28 (21.2) | 78 (21.3) | 0.981 |
Hyperlipidemia | 150 (30.1) | 42 (31.8) | 108 (29.5) | 0.620 |
Coronary heart disease | 39 (7.8) | 11 (8.3) | 28 (7.7) | 0.802 |
Atrial fibrillation | 16 (3.2) | 2 (1.5) | 14 (3.8) | 0.197 |
Prior stroke | 152 (30.5) | 43 (32.6) | 109 (29.8) | 0.550 |
Smoking | 127 (25.5) | 37 (28.0) | 90 (24.6) | 0.437 |
Drinking | 114 (22.9) | 33 (25.0) | 81 (22.1) | 0.501 |
Medication history, n (%) | ||||
Antihypertensive | 221 (44.4) | 66 (50.0) | 155 (42.3) | 0.129 |
Antiplatelet | 105 (21.1) | 34 (25.8) | 71 (19.4) | 0.125 |
Anticoagulant | 3 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.8) | 0.569 |
Statin | 88 (17.7) | 29 (22.0) | 59 (16.1) | 0.131 |
Hematoma location, n (%) | ||||
Lobe | 54 (10.8) | 16 (12.1) | 38 (10.4) | 0.582 |
Basal ganglia | 274 (55.0) | 73 (55.3) | 201 (54.9) | 0.939 |
Thalamus | 114 (22.9) | 34 (25.8) | 80 (21.9) | 0.361 |
Cerebellum | 39 (7.8) | 6 (4.5) | 33 (9.0) | 0.101 |
Brainstem | 17 (3.4) | 4 (3.0) | 13 (3.6) | 1.000 |
Concurrent ventricular hemorrhage, n (%) | 112 (22.5) | 40 (30.3) | 72 (19.7) | 0.012 |
Baseline hematoma volume, mL | 12 (8–18) | 15 (12–21) | 11 (7–16) | <0.001 |
Hematoma expansion, n (%) | 79 (15.9) | 31 (23.5) | 48 (13.1) | 0.005 |
Clinical characteristics | ||||
Body temperature, °C | 36.6 (36.4–36.8) | 36.6 (36.5–36.8) | 36.5 (36.3–36.8) | 0.243 |
Time from onset to admission, h | 3.5 (2.0–6.0) | 3.0 (2.0–7.8) | 3.5 (2.0–6.0) | 0.918 |
Time from onset to first CT, h | 3.4 (2.3–6.4) | 3.4 (2.4–7.2) | 3.5 (2.3–5.5) | 0.837 |
Baseline SBP, mmHg | 165 (150–183) | 170 (150–190) | 164 (149–180) | 0.189 |
Baseline DBP, mmHg | 100 (88–110) | 100 (90–110) | 100 (86–110) | 0.104 |
Baseline GCS score | 15 (14–15) | 15 (14–15) | 15 (15–15) | <0.001 |
Baseline CSS score | 7.0 (5.0–8.0) | 6.5 (5.0–7.5) | 7.0 (5.0–8.0) | 0.003 |
Laboratory data | ||||
Leukocyte, ×109/L | 7.48 (5.92–9.34) | 7.92 (6.54–9.46) | 7.39 (5.69–9.30) | 0.087 |
Neutrophil, ×109/L | 5.45 (4.00–7.32) | 5.94 (4.56–7.28) | 5.34 (3.89–7.39) | 0.068 |
Hemoglobin, g/L | 129 (119–142) | 131 (120–143) | 129 (119–142) | 0.235 |
C-reactive protein, mg/L | 2.0 (0.9–4.0) | 2.0 (1.0–4.0) | 2.0 (0.9–4.9) | 0.503 |
Plasma fibrinogen, g/L | 2.80 (2.35–3.31) | 2.77 (2.33–3.16) | 2.82 (2.39–3.35) | 0.235 |
Homocysteine, µmol/L | 12.4 (9.0–16.5) | 14.1 (10.0–18.2) | 12.2 (8.8–16.0) | 0.030 |
Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.1 (3.5–4.9) | 4.1 (3.3–5.0) | 4.1 (3.5–4.8) | 0.931 |
Triglyceride, mmol/L | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) | 1.3 (1.0–2.1) | 1.3 (0.9–1.7) | 0.134 |
HDL, mg/dL | 1.2 (0.9–1.4) | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 1.2 (0.9–1.4) | 0.965 |
LDL, mg/dL | 2.6 (2.1–3.1) | 2.6 (2.0–3.0) | 2.5 (2.1–3.1) | 0.920 |
Serum glucose, mmol/L | 5.5 (4.8–6.7) | 5.6 (4.8–6.9) | 5.5 (4.8–6.7) | 0.607 |
Blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L | 4.8 (3.9–5.8) | 4.8 (4.0–5.9) | 4.8 (3.9–5.7) | 0.503 |
Creatinine, µmol/L | 88 (76–98) | 91 (77–105) | 86 (76–96) | 0.007 |
UA, µmol/L | 281 (224–349) | 332 (245–408) | 270 (220–328) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CSS, Canadian Stroke Scale; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; END, early neurological deterioration; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; UA, uric acid.
Table 2 shows that the ascending quantiles of UA was associated with male sex (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.001), smokers (P = 0.033), alcohol drinkers (P < 0.001), previous use of antihypertensive drugs (P = 0.018), higher rates of concurrent ventricular hemorrhage (P = 0.041) and hematoma expansion (P = 0.030), higher baseline hematoma (P = 0.033), higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure (both P < 0.001), higher prevalence of END (P < 0.001), higher levels of homocysteine (P = 0.008), triglycerides (P < 0.001), blood urea nitrogen (P < 0.001) and creatinine (P < 0.001). Also, patients with higher UA were younger (P = 0.001).
Table 2.
Variables | UA (µmol/L) | P value for Trend | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 (≤224, n=126) | Q2 (224–281, n=126) | Q3 (281–349, n=125) | Q4 (>349, n=121) | ||
Age, years | 67.0 (60.0–77.0) | 70.0 (55.8–79.0) | 63.0 (52.5–72.5) | 64.0 (51.0–72.0) | 0.001 |
Gender, Male, n (%) | 52 (41.3) | 81 (64.3) | 84 (67.2) | 105 (86.8) | <0.001 |
Medical history, n (%) | |||||
Hypertension | 82 (65.1) | 106 (84.1) | 96 (76.8) | 104 (86.0) | <0.001 |
Diabetes | 35 (27.8) | 25 (19.8) | 26 (20.8) | 20 (16.5) | 0.173 |
Hyperlipidemia | 29 (23.0) | 37 (29.4) | 42 (33.6) | 42 (34.7) | 0.173 |
Coronary heart disease | 10 (7.9) | 10 (7.9) | 10 (8.0) | 9 (7.4) | 0.998 |
Atrial fibrillation | 4 (3.2) | 6 (4.8) | 2 (1.6) | 4 (3.3) | 0.568 |
Prior stroke | 35 (27.8) | 45 (35.7) | 37 (29.6) | 35 (28.9) | 0.523 |
Smoking | 22 (17.5) | 32 (25.4) | 32 (25.6) | 41 (33.9) | 0.033 |
Drinking | 17 (13.5) | 21 (16.7) | 31 (24.8) | 45 (37.2) | <0.001 |
Medication history, n (%) | |||||
Antihypertensive | 44 (34.9) | 53 (42.1) | 58 (46.4) | 66 (54.5) | 0.018 |
Antiplatelet | 26 (20.6) | 30 (23.8) | 28 (22.4) | 21 (17.4) | 0.633 |
Anticoagulant | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (0.8) | 0.796 |
Statin | 17 (13.5) | 21 (16.7) | 25 (20.0) | 25 (20.7) | 0.422 |
Hematoma location, n (%) | |||||
Lobe | 14 (11.1) | 11 (8.7) | 18 (14.4) | 11 (9.1) | 0.456 |
Basal ganglia | 71 (56.3) | 75 (59.5) | 62 (49.6) | 66 (54.5) | 0.454 |
Thalamus | 28 (22.2) | 25 (19.8) | 29 (23.2) | 32 (26.4) | 0.666 |
Cerebellum | 9 (7.1) | 14 (11.1) | 9 (7.2) | 7 (5.8) | 0.435 |
Brainstem | 4 (3.2) | 1 (0.8) | 7 (5.6) | 5 (4.1) | 0.200 |
Concurrent ventricular hemorrhage, n (%) | 21 (16.7) | 26 (20.6) | 27 (21.6) | 38 (31.4) | 0.041 |
Baseline hematoma volume, mL | 10 (7–15) | 13 (8–17) | 12 (8–18) | 13 (10–20) | 0.033 |
Hematoma expansion, n (%) | 11 (8.7) | 18 (14.3) | 24 (19.2) | 26 (21.5) | 0.030 |
END, n (%) | 25 (19.8) | 24 (19.0) | 29 (23.2) | 54 (44.6) | <0.001 |
Clinical characteristics | |||||
Body temperature, °C | 36.6 (36.4–36.8) | 36.6 (36.4–36.8) | 36.7 (36.4–36.8) | 36.5 (36.3–36.7) | 0.261 |
Time from onset to admission, h | 3.5 (2.0–6.0) | 3.0 (2.0–7.8) | 3.5 (2.0–6.0) | 0.487 | |
Time from onset to first CT, h | 3.0 (2.0–7.3) | 4.0 (2.8–7.0) | 4.0 (2.0–6.0) | 3.0 (2.0–6.0) | 0.705 |
Baseline SBP, mmHg | 160 (142–175) | 167 (150–185) | 161 (145–180) | 172 (152–192) | <0.001 |
Baseline DBP, mmHg | 95 (80–105) | 100 (85–108) | 100 (90–110) | 100 (94–116) | <0.001 |
Baseline GCS score | 15 (14–15) | 15 (15–15) | 15 (15–15) | 15 (14–15) | 0.065 |
Baseline CSS score | 6.0 (4.5–8.0) | 7.0 (5.0–8.0) | 7.0 (6.0–8.0) | 7.0 (6.0–8.0) | 0.137 |
Laboratory data | |||||
Leukocyte, ×109/L | 7.20 (5.62–9.16) | 8.00 (5.71–9.60) | 7.40 (5.90–9.22) | 7.73 (6.59–9.49) | 0.223 |
Neutrophil, ×109/L | 5.38 (3.73–7.31) | 5.68 (4.05–7.76) | 5.26 (3.94–7.11) | 5.56 (4.16–7.05) | 0.467 |
Hemoglobin, g/L | 126 (116–142) | 129 (120–142) | 132 (119–142) | 132 (120–142) | 0.244 |
C-reactive protein, mg/L | 2.0 (1.0–6.0) | 2.0 (0.9–5.1) | 1.7 (0.5–4.0) | 2.0 (1.0–3.0) | 0.830 |
Plasma fibrinogen, g/L | 2.80 (2.47–3.39) | 2.87 (2.42–3.33) | 2.73 (2.13–3.22) | 2.81 (2.39–3.29) | 0.247 |
Homocysteine, µmol/L | 11.3 (8.6–14.7) | 12.1 (9.0–16.9) | 12.7 (10.3–16.0) | 14.4 (10.0–18.7) | 0.008 |
Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.0 (3.4–4.7) | 4.1 (3.5–5.1) | 4.1 (3.5–4.8) | 4.3 (3.6–5.0) | 0.237 |
Triglyceride, mmol/L | 1.0 (0.8–1.5) | 1.3 (0.9–1.8) | 1.3 (1.0–2.0) | 1.4 (1.0–1.9) | <0.001 |
HDL, mg/dL | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 1.2 (1.0–1.3) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | 0.309 |
LDL, mg/dL | 2.5 (2.0–3.0) | 2.5 (2.0–3.1) | 2.5 (2.0–3.0) | 2.7 (2.1–3.2) | 0.194 |
Serum glucose, mmol/L | 5.5 (4.7–7.6) | 5.7 (4.9–7.2) | 5.4 (4.8–6.5) | 5.4 (4.7–6.3) | 0.213 |
Blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L | 4.4 (3.5–5.0) | 4.7 (3.8–5.5) | 4.9 (3.9–6.0) | 5.4 (4.6–6.9) | <0.001 |
Creatinine, µmol/L | 77 (69–89) | 86 (76–95) | 88 (80–98) | 97 (88–118) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CSS, Canadian Stroke Scale; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; END, early neurological deterioration; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; UA, uric acid.
Table 3 exhibits the results of the binary logistic regression of END. In the unadjusted model, compared with the first quartile, patients with UA levels in the fourth quartile, were more likely to have END (OR 3.256, 95% CI 1.849–5.734, P < 0.001). The association remained significant after adjusting for the potential confounders (OR 2.282, 95% CI 1.112–4.685, P = 0.013).
Table 3.
Quartiles of UA (µmol/L) | P value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 (≤224, n=126) | Q2 (224–281, n=126) | Q3 (281–349, n=125) | Q4 (>349, n=121) | ||
Unadjusted model | Reference | 0.951 (0.509–1.774) | 1.220 (0.667–2.231) | 3.256 (1.849–5.734) | <0.001 |
Model 1 | Reference | 0.951 (0.505–1.792) | 1.233 (0.664–2.288) | 3.303 (1.795–6.079) | <0.001 |
Model 2 | Reference | 0.823 (0.419–1.614) | 1.043 (0.530–2.051) | 2.282 (1.112–4.685) | 0.013 |
Notes: Model 1: adjusted for age and sex; model 2: further adjusted for variables with P value < 0.1 in univariate analysis (concurrent ventricular hemorrhage, baseline hematoma volume, baseline GCS score, baseline CSS score, leukocyte, neutrophil, homocysteine and creatinine).
Abbreviations: CSS, Canadian Stroke Scale; END, early neurological deterioration; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; UA, uric acid.
Multiple-adjusted restricted cubic spline regression showed an ascending trend of UA (P = 0.100 for nonlinearity, as shown in Figure 1) with the risk of END.
Discussion
This study reveals a significantly increased risk of END among ICH individuals with higher serum UA levels after adjusting for a series of potential confounders. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between UA and END in patients with ICH.
The results of previous studies on risk factors of END showed discrepancy, mainly related to the differences in diagnostic criteria and research objects. It has been reported that END was defined as a decrease in the GCS score of ≥ 3 or death within the first 72 hours,21 > 2 points increase in the NIHSS score within a 72-hour period,22 or a decrease in the CSS score of ≥ 1 points within 48 hours.8 In view of the high reliability and validity of CSS score for the assessment of neurological impairment in patients with stroke,23 and the relatively convenient scoring procedures, END was defined as the CSS score decreased ≥ 1 points between admission and 48 hours in the current research.8 In this prospective study, END occurred in 26.5% of patients with ICH, slightly higher than the previous study, which may be due to ethnic differences in the study population.8
Although the exact mechanisms between UA and END in patients with ICH remained unclear, the following might explain it. First, previous studies have shown that a higher white blood cell count is predictive of END in patients with ICH, suggesting that inflammatory response may be involved in END.8,21 Serum UA, on the other hand, promotes the release of a range of inflammatory mediators, such as neutrophils count, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-18, and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a),24,25 which may in turn lead to END. Secondly, serum UA has pro-oxidant properties by increasing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS).26 Then, the increased oxidative stress level can aggravate secondary brain injury after ICH through inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy and destruction of blood–brain barrier,27 and eventually contribute to END. Last but not the least, individuals with higher levels of UA were more likely to have larger baseline hematoma volume, higher proportions of intraventricular hemorrhage and hematoma expansion, and all of which have been shown to be risk factors associated with END in patients with ICH.8,9
Some limitations should be noted in this study. First, this was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size, thereby limiting the ability to extend the finding. Secondly, the UA level was detected only once on admission, but not dynamically monitored during the study. The pattern of dynamic change of UA could provide better prognostic information. Thirdly, recent emerging lines of evidence suggest that high blood pressure variations are important predictors of the prognosis of ICH.28,29 However, our study did not take this factor into account. Finally, we had little background information, such as purine consumption, history of gout and exercise habit that would affect admission serum UA concentration.
Conclusions
In conclusion, an elevated serum UA level was independently associated with END in patients with ICH. Therefore, intervention to lower UA level may be worth considering.
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by the National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students (202010361110) and Huainan Guidance Science and Technology Plan Project (2020104).
Disclosure
All authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, et al. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:167–176. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, et al. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(1):43–53. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00266-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zarean E, Lattanzi S, Looha MA, et al. Glycemic gap predicts in-hospital mortality in diabetic patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(5):105669. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jafari M, Di Napoli M, Lattanzi S, et al. Serum magnesium level and hematoma expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Di Napoli M, Slevin M, Popa-Wagner A, et al. Monomeric c-reactive protein and cerebral hemorrhage: from bench to bedside. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1921. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lattanzi S, Cagnetti C, Provinciali L, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and neurological deterioration following acute cerebral hemorrhage. Oncotarget. 2017;8:57489–57494. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mahmoudi J, Majdi A, Lattanzi S, et al. Imidazoline receptor agonists for managing hypertension may hold promise for treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage. Curr Mol Med. 2018;18:241–251. doi: 10.2174/1566524018666180926163712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Godoy DA, Boccio A. Early neurologic deterioration in intracerebral hemorrhage: predictors and associated factors. Neurology. 2005;64:931–932; author reply 931–932. doi: 10.1212/WNL.64.5.931-a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lord AS, Gilmore E, Choi HA, et al. Time course and predictors of neurological deterioration after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2015;46:647–652. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang Q, Gong H, Lin C, et al. The prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in middle-aged and elderly people in Tibet autonomous region, china: a preliminary study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(2):e18542. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li L, Yang C, Zhao Y, et al. Is hyperuricemia an independent risk factor for new-onset chronic kidney disease?: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on observational cohort studies. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kuwabara M, Hisatome I, Niwa K, et al. Uric acid is a strong risk marker for developing hypertension from prehypertension: a 5-year Japanese cohort study. Hypertension. 2018;71:78–86. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sundström J, Sullivan L, D’Agostino RB, et al. Relations of serum uric acid to longitudinal blood pressure tracking and hypertension incidence. Hypertension. 2005;45:28–33. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000150784.92944.9a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lytvyn Y, Perkins BA, Cherney DZ. Uric acid as a biomarker and a therapeutic target in diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39:239–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang Y, Tian J, Zeng C, et al. Relationship between hyperuricemia and risk of coronary heart disease in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. J Int Med Res. 2017;45:254–260. doi: 10.1177/0300060516673923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang S, Liu L, Huang YQ, et al. The association between serum uric acid levels and ischemic stroke in essential hypertension patients. Postgrad Med. 2020;132:551–558. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1757924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weir CJ, Muir SW, Walters MR, et al. Serum urate as an independent predictor of poor outcome and future vascular events after acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:1951–1956. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081983.34771.D2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yuan K, Zhang X, Chen J, et al. Uric acid level and risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular treatment. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27:1048–1055. doi: 10.1111/ene.14202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Storhaug HM, Norvik JV, Toft I, et al. Uric acid is a risk factor for ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality in the general population: a gender specific analysis from the tromsø study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13(1):115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Côté R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, et al. The Canadian neurological scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology. 1989;39:638–643. doi: 10.1212/WNL.39.5.638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sun W, Peacock A, Becker J, et al. Correlation of leukocytosis with early neurological deterioration following supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:1096–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.11.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Seo WK, Seok HY, Kim JH, et al. C-reactive protein is a predictor of early neurologic deterioration in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;21:181–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stavem K, Lossius M, Rønning OM. Reliability and validity of the Canadian neurological scale in retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(3):286–291. doi: 10.1159/000071129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kimura Y, Yanagida T, Onda A, et al. Soluble uric acid promotes atherosclerosis via ampk (amp-activated protein kinase)-mediated inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:570–582. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ruggiero C, Cherubini A, Ble A, et al. Uric acid and inflammatory markers. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1174–1181. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kurajoh M, Fukumoto S, Yoshida S, et al. Uric acid shown to contribute to increased oxidative stress level independent of xanthine oxidoreductase activity in medcity21 health examination registry. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86962-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yao Z, Bai Q, Wang G. Mechanisms of oxidative stress and therapeutic targets following intracerebral hemorrhage. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:8815441. doi: 10.1155/2021/8815441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Andalib S, Lattanzi S, Di Napoli M, et al. Blood pressure variability: a new predicting factor for clinical outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(12):105340. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Divani AA, Liu X, Di Napoli M, et al. Blood pressure variability predicts poor in-hospital outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019;50(8):2023–2029. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]