Skip to main content
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine logoLink to Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
. 2021 Jul 20;9(8):e1756. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1756

Recommendation of premarital genetic screening in the Syrian Jewish community based on mutation carrier frequencies within Syrian Jewish cohorts

David A Zeevi 1,, Wendy K Chung 2, Chaim Levi 1, Sholem Y Scher 3, Rachel Bringer 1, Yael Kahan 1, Hagit Muallem 1, Rinat Benel 1, Yoel Hirsch 3, Tzvi Weiden 1, Ahron Ekstein 1, Josef Ekstein 3
PMCID: PMC8404236  PMID: 34288589

Abstract

Background

There is a paucity of information available regarding the carrier frequency for autosomal recessive pathogenic variants among Syrian Jews. This report provides data to support carrier screening for a group of autosomal recessive conditions among Syrian Jews based on the population frequency of 40 different pathogenic variants in a cohort of over 3800 individuals with Syrian Jewish ancestry.

Methods

High throughput PCR amplicon sequencing was used to genotype 40 disease‐causing variants in 3840 and 5279 individuals of Syrian and Iranian Jewish ancestry, respectively. These data were compared with Ashkenazi Jewish carrier frequencies for the same variants, based on roughly 370,000 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals in the Dor Yeshorim database.

Results

Carrier screening identified pathogenic variants shared among Syrian, Iranian, and Ashkenazi Jewish groups. In addition, alleles unique to each group were identified. Importantly, 8.2% of 3401 individuals of mixed Syrian Jewish ancestry were carriers for at least one pathogenic variant.

Conclusion

The findings of this study support the clinical usefulness of premarital genetic screening for individuals with Syrian Jewish ancestry to reduce the incidence of autosomal recessive disease among persons with Syrian Jewish heritage.

Keywords: carrier frequency, Iranian Jewish, premarital genetic screening, Syrian Jewish


There is a paucity of information available regarding the carrier frequency for autosomal recessive pathogenic variants among Syrian Jews. This report provides data to support carrier screening for a group of autosomal recessive conditions among Syrian Jews based on the population frequency of 40 different pathogenic variants in a cohort of over 3800 individuals with Syrian Jewish ancestry.

graphic file with name MGG3-9-e1756-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Over the past few decades, premarital genetic testing has served as a model preventative measure to prevent the birth of babies affected with serious medical conditions in Jewish communities. Premarital carrier screening programs, such as that in Dor Yeshorim, have contributed to the dramatic reduction of recessive disease incidence in Ashkenazi Jews, especially for Tay Sachs and cystic fibrosis (Ekstein & Katzenstein, 2001; Kornreich et al., 2004). In Israel, preconception/prenatal carrier screening has been offered to Jewish individuals since 1978 (Zlotogora, 2014). Beginning with Tay Sachs screening, carrier screening has expanded to tens and hundreds of disease‐causing alleles for autosomal recessive conditions in Jewish populations around the world (Zlotogora, 2019). In the US, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) established guidelines for genetic testing of Ashkenazi Jewish individuals in 2008 (“Committee Opinion No. 691,” 2017). However, although various screening programs have made efforts to reach other non‐Ashkenazi Jewish groups, carrier screening is utilized less frequently in non‐Ashkenazi Jewish communities (Akler et al., 2020; Bloch, 2009).

Intramarriage within parts of the Ashkenazi Jewish population are well documented (Carmi et al., 2014) and is a contributor to a high carrier frequency for certain disease‐causing variants for recessive conditions in this ancestral group (Zlotogora, 2014). However, intramarriage is not unique to Ashkenazi Jewry. To varying extents, Sephardi and Mizrahi Jewish groups have a history of intramarriage, unique to their geographical origin (Goldschmidt et al., 1960). These population characteristics have led the Israeli Society of Medical Geneticists to establish carrier screening guidelines for all Jews based on country of origin, indicating that all Jewish groups carry pathogenic disease‐causing recessive variants and that screening should be tailored based upon genetic ancestry (Zlotogora, 2019).

Syrian and Iranian Jews are genetically quite similar (Atzmon et al., 2010), yet unlike disease‐causing variants common to Iranian Jews (Dagan & Gershoni‐Baruch, 2010), much information is lacking regarding the frequency of pathogenic variants in Syrian Jews. Hence, we chose Iranian Jews as a comparison group for the assessment of allele frequencies within the Syrian Jewish population. In this study, we characterize the frequency of several pathogenic variants within Syrian and Iranian Jewish cohorts. We establish ancestry‐specific frequencies of certain variants in each group, and we describe some variants shared between Syrians and Iranians and between Syrians and Ashkenazis. The latter findings suggest that it may be most practical to apply pan‐Jewish variant screening for effective carrier screening within the Syrian Jewish community.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Ethnic origin definition of study participants

Participants in the screening program provided information regarding the ancestry of all four grandparents. Self‐identified ancestry has been previously shown to be accurate (Need et al., 2009). For inclusion in the study, individuals with at least one maternal or one paternal Syrian/Iranian grandparent were selected. For families with 2 or more siblings, 1 sibling was randomly selected for analysis so that the final cohort would include only unrelated Syrian/Iranian individuals. Altogether, 439 unrelated 100% Syrian (with 4 Syrian grandparents), 3401 unrelated mixed Syrian (with less than 4 Syrian grandparents), and 5279 unrelated mixed Iranians were included in the analysis. For comparison, carrier frequencies in Ashkenazi Jews were calculated from roughly 370,000 Ashkenazi Jewish samples in the Dor Yeshorim database.

2.2. Genotyping of sequence variants and the FRDA expansion with high throughput amplicon sequencing

A multiplex PCR assay was used to target the single nucleotide variants (SNVs)/small insertions/small deletions in Tables 1 and 2, as well as the Friedrich's ataxia (FRDA) GAA expansion locus in intron 1 of the FXN gene. Multiplex PCR products from each sample were barcode indexed before sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq. Resultant sequencing reads were aligned to the reference genome (hg38) and relevant variants were genotyped using GATK UnifiedGenotyper/HaplotypeCaller packages (Broad Institute). Genotyping assays for each SNV/small insertion/small deletion were validated by testing at least 2 or 3 different heterozygote control samples. For FRDA expansion carrier detection, the following extra analytical steps were performed. Sequencing reads were aligned to an “STRdecoys.fasta” reference (obtained from [Dashnow et al., 2018]) which was supplemented with the expected non‐GAA FXN intron 1 amplicon sequence from hg38. Using this mapping strategy, it was expected that FRDA repeat‐expanded reads would map to both the decoy GAA “chromosome” and the FXN intron 1 “chromosome.” These split‐reads were extracted by samblaster (Faust & Hall, 2014) followed by counting the total number of GAA repeats per sample and GAA repeat‐bearing reads per sample. Furthermore, within repeat‐bearing reads, the number of GAA repeats per read was calculated for each sample. After sorting the number of repeats per read, the 3 highest repeat‐per‐read frequencies per sample were saved to a final report. True FRDA carriers were detected when the top 2 repeat‐per‐read frequencies (RPRF) all exceeded 35 GAA repeats. Otherwise, all samples with less than 2 RPRF >35 GAA repeats were reported as non‐carriers. All positive FRDA custom amplicon sequencing‐based results were validated by an established fluorescent repeat‐primed PCR‐based method (Ciotti et al., 2004). In addition, the specificity of the sequencing‐based method was determined by confirming 367 random non‐carrier samples (as determined by high throughput sequencing) using the fluorescent PCR assay.

TABLE 1.

Disease‐causing variants for which carrier state was identified in at least one Syrian Jewish individual with 4 Syrian Jewish grandparents at Dor Yeshorim

Variant name Chromosome Position (hg38) rsID Ref Alt Gene OMIM Gene Nucleotide changea Amino acid changeb Phenotype Syrian Jewish carrier frequency (no. carriers/n) Syrian Jewish carrier frequency % Ashkenazi Jewish carrier frequency (no. carriers/n) Ashkenazi Jewish carrier frequency % Followed up in Table 2
ABCC8:c.3989‐9G>A chr11 17397055 rs151344623 C T ABCC8 600509 NM_000352.6:c.3989‐9G>A splice acceptor HYPERINSULINEMIC HYPOGLYCEMIA, FAMILIAL, 1 1/339 0.29 3969/235602 1.68 NO
AGXT:c.731T>C chr2 240875159 rs121908525 T C AGXT 604285 NM_000030.3:c.731T>C NP_000021.1:p.Ile244Thr PRIMARY HYPEROXALURIA TYPE 1 4/369 1.08 0/21050 0.00 YES
ARSA:c.449C>T chr22 50627182 rs199476375 G A ARSA 607574 NM_000487.6:c.449C>T NP_000478.3:p.Pro150Leu METACHROMATIC LEUKODYSTROPHY 5/376 1.33 1/51587 0.00 YES
ARSA:c.854+3A>G chr22 50626588 rs1057524566 T C ARSA 607574 NM_000487.6:c.854+3A>G splice donor METACHROMATIC LEUKODYSTROPHY 5/376 1.33 0/46388 0.00 YES
BLM:c.2208T>G chr15 90766924 rs865899765 T G BLM 604610 NM_000057.4:c.2208T>G NP_000048.1:p.Tyr736Ter BLOOM SYNDROME 1/404 0.25 3265/335777 0.97 NO
CFTR:c.3846G>A chr7 117642566 rs77010898 G A CFTR 602421 NM_000492.4:c.3846G>A NP_000483.3:p.Trp1282Ter CYSTIC FIBROSIS 3/435 0.69 6721/335635 2.00 NO
CFTR:c.254G>A chr7 117509123 rs75961395 G A CFTR 602421 NM_000492.4:c.254G>A NP_000483.3:p.Gly85Glu CYSTIC FIBROSIS 2/381 0.52 0/97562 0.00 YES
CFTR:c.1624G>T chr7 117587778 rs113993959 G T CFTR 602421 NM_000492.4:c.1624G>T NP_000483.3:p.Gly542Ter CYSTIC FIBROSIS 2/435 0.46 737/335635 0.22 NO
CFTR:c.1521_1523del chr7 117559590 rs113993960 ATCT A CFTR 602421 NM_000492.4:c.1521_1523del NP_000483.3:p.Phe508del CYSTIC FIBROSIS 2/438 0.46 3965/335635 1.18 YES
CFTR:c.2989‐1G>A chr7 117610518 rs397508470 G A CFTR 602421 NM_000492.4:c.2989‐1G>A splice acceptor CYSTIC FIBROSIS 1/329 0.30 0/223335 0.00 NO
CNGB3:c.467C>T chr8 86670970 rs139207764 G A CNGB3 605080 NM_019098.4:c.467C>T NP_061971.3:p.Ser156Phe ACHROMATOPSIA 7/376 1.86 26/44392 0.06 YES
COL6A2:c.1402C>T chr21 46121067 rs374669775 C T COL6A2 120240 NM_001849.3:c.1402C>T NP_001840.3:p.Arg468Ter ULLRICH CONGENITAL MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY TYPE 1 13/331 3.93 0/5922 0.00 YES
CYP11B1:c.992C>T chr8 142875841 rs1326688256 G A CYP11B1 610613 NM_000497.3:c.992C>T NP_000488.3:p.Ala331Val CONGENITAL ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA 10/376 2.66 0/44988 0.00 YES
DHCR7:c.964‐1G>C chr11 71435840 rs138659167 C G DHCR7 602858 NM_001360.3:c.964‐1G>C splice acceptor SMITH‐LEMLI‐OPITZ SYNDROME 2/227 0.88 2016/88773 2.27 NO
DSE:c.387delC chr6 116399636 N/A AC A DSE 605942 NM_013352.4:c.387delC NP_037484.1:p.Tyr129Ter EHLERS‐DANLOS SYNDROME, MUSCULOCONTRACTURAL TYPE2 1/369 0.27 0/21009 0.00 YES
ESCO2:c.1674‐2A>G chr8 27803304 rs80359869 A G ESCO2 609353 NM_001017420.3:c.1674‐2A>G splice acceptor ROBERTS SYNDROME 2/376 0.53 0/51519 0.00 YES
FAM161A:c.1567C>T chr2 61839437 rs202193201 G A FAM161A 613596 NM_001201543.2:c.1567C>T NP_001188472.1:p.Arg523Ter RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA 28 3/154 1.95 1/49492 0.00 NO
FXN:GAA expansion chr9 69037287 N/A GAA GAA>> FXN 606829 NM_000144:GAA expansion N/A FRIEDREICH ATAXIA 3/331 0.91 14/5109 0.27 YES
G6PC:c.247C>T chr17 42903947 rs1801175 C T G6PC1 613742 NM_000151.4:c.247C>T NP_000142.2:p.Arg83Cys GLYCOGEN STORAGE DISEASE TYPE 1A 2/397 0.50 4816/335799 1.43 NO
GBA:c.1448T>C chr1 155235252 rs421016 A G GBA 606463 NM_000157.4:c.1448T>C NP_000148.2:p.Leu483Pro GAUCHER DISEASE 1/101 0.99 88/72333 0.12 NO
GJB2:c.167del chr13 20189414 rs80338942 CA C GJB2 121011 NM_004004.6:c.167del NP_003995.2:p. Leu56fs NONSYNDROMIC DEAFNESS 8/368 2.17 929/32870 2.83 YES
GJB2:c.269T>C chr13 20189313 rs80338945 A G GJB2 121011 NM_004004.6:c.269T>C NP_003995.2:p.Leu90Pro NONSYNDROMIC DEAFNESS 1/104 0.96 7/32171 0.02 NO
GNE:c.2228T>C chr9 36217399 rs28937594 A G GNE 603824 NM_001128227.3:c.2228T>C NP_001121699.1:p.Met743Thr INCLUSION BODY MYOPATHY (HIBM) 8/376 2.13 1/51647 0.00 YES
MLC1:c.176G>A chr22 50084727 rs80358242 C T MLC1 605908 NM_015166.3:c.176G>A NP_055981.1:p.Gly59Glu MEGALENCEPHALIC LEUKOENCEPHALOPATHY WITH SUBCORTICAL CYSTS 1 1/273 0.37 0/53648 0.00 NO
MMACHC:c.271dup chr1 45507544 rs398124292 T TA MMACHC 609831 NM_015506.3:c.271dup NP_056321.2:p.Arg91fs METHYLMALONIC ACIDURIA AND HOMOCYSTINURIA, cblC TYPE 1/154 0.65 372/49724 0.75 NO
NDUFS4:c.355G>C chr5 53658555 rs747359752 G C NDUFS4 602694 NM_002495.4:c.355G>C NP_002486.1:p.Asp119His LEIGH SYNDROME TYPE 1 2/376 0.53 0/46275 0.00 YES
OTOF:c.5193‐1G>A chr2 26462182 rs111033373 C T OTOF 603681 NM_194248.3:c.5193‐1G>A splice acceptor DEAFNESS, AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE 4/101 3.96 0/30796 0.00 NO
OTOF:c.4227+1G>T chr2 26467364 rs397515601 C A OTOF 603681 NM_194248.3:c.4227+1G>T splice donor DEAFNESS, AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE 1/102 0.98 0/30826 0.00 NO
PEX2:c.355C>T chr8 76983824 rs61752123 G A PEX2 170993 NM_000318.3:c.355C>T NP_000309.2:p.Arg119Ter PEROXISOME BIOGENESIS DISORDER 5A (ZELLWEGER) 1/154 0.65 379/49883 0.76 NO
SMPD1:c.1829G>A chr11 6394540 rs140269316 G A SMPD1 607608 NM_000543.5:c.1829G>A NP_000534.3:p.Arg610His NIEMANN‐PICK DISEASE 1/93 1.08 0/25901 0.00 NO
SMPD1:c.1826_1828GCC chr11 6394536 rs120074118 TGCC T SMPD1 607608 NM_000543.5:c.1826_1828GCC NP_000534.3:p.Arg610del NIEMANN‐PICK DISEASE 2/380 0.53 66/304382 0.02 NO
TRPM1:36.8KB DEL chr15 31062999‐31099445 N/A N/A N/A TRPM1 603576 36.8KB DEL, EX2‐7c N/A CONGENITAL STATIONARY NIGHT BLINDNESS 2/133 1.50 946/37796 2.50 NO
VAC14:c.2005G>T chr16 70695574 rs1363536856 C A VAC14 604632 NM_018052.5:c.2005G>T NP_060522.3:p.Val669Leu STRIATONIGRAL DEGENERATION 1/367 0.27 0/30779 0.00 YES

Variants are sorted alphabetically according to gene name and then by Syrian Jewish carrier frequency from highest to lowest. Carrier frequencies in individuals with 4 Ashkenazi Jewish grandparents are shown for comparison.

Abbreviations: N/A, not applicable; PMID, Pubmed ID.

a

Genbank transcript accession number:nucleotide change.

b

Genbank protein accession number:amino acid change (where relevant).

c

This copy number variant is described in PMID: 31645983.

TABLE 2.

Metadata for variants assayed by high throughput sequencing in this report

Variant Name Chromosome Position (hg38) rsID Ref Alt Gene OMIM Gene Nucleotide changea Amino acid changeb Phenotype Citation (PMID) Variant Categoryc
AGXT:c.731T>C chr2 240875159 rs121908525 T C AGXT 604285 NM_000030.3:c.731T>C NP_000021.1:p.Ile244Thr PRIMARY HYPEROXALURIA TYPE 1 9192270 1
AIRE:c.254A>G chr21 44286678 rs179363882 A G AIRE 607358 NM_000383.4:c.254A>G NP_000374.1:p.Tyr85Cys AUTOIMMUNE POLYENDOCRINOPATHY 10677297 2
ARSA:c.449C>T chr22 50627182 rs199476375 G A ARSA 607574 NM_000487.6:c.449C>T NP_000478.3:p.Pro150Leu METACHROMATIC LEUKODYSTROPHY 10381328 1
ARSA:c.854+3A>G chr22 50626588 rs1057524566 T C ARSA 607574 NM_000487.6:c.854+3A>G splice donor METACHROMATIC LEUKODYSTROPHY 1670590 4 1
BLM:c.98+1G>T chr15 90747491 rs750293380 G T BLM 604610 NM_001287246.2:c.98+1G>T splice donor BLOOM SYNDROME 17407155 1
CFTR:c.1521_1523del chr7 117559590 rs113993960 ATCT A CFTR 602421 NM_000492.4:c.1521_1523del NP_000483.3:p.Phe508del CYSTIC FIBROSIS 2475911, 2570460 5
CFTR:c.254G>A chr7 117509123 rs75961395 G A CFTR 602421 NM_000492.4:c.254G>A NP_000483.3:p.Gly85Glu CYSTIC FIBROSIS 15176679 1
CNGA3:c.1585G>A chr2 98396755 rs104893619 G A CNGA3 600053 NM_001298.3:c.1585G>A NP_001289.1:p.Val529Met ACHROMATOPSIA 20549516 4
CNGB3:c.467C>T chr8 86670970 rs139207764 G A CNGB3 605080 NM_019098.4:c.467C>T NP_061971.3:p.Ser156Phe ACHROMATOPSIA 15657609 1
COL6A2:c.1402C>T chr21 46121067 rs374669775 C T COL6A2 120240 NM_001849.3:c.1402C>T NP_001840.3:p.Arg468Ter ULLRICH CONGENITAL MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY TYPE 1 23326386 1
CYP11B1:c.992C>T chr8 142875841 rs1326688256 G A CYP11B1 610613 NM_000497.3:c.992C>T NP_000488.3:p.Ala331Val CONGENITAL ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA 8768848 1
DSE:c.387delC chr6 116399636 N/A AC A DSE 605942 NM_013352.4:c.387delC NP_037484.1:p.Tyr129Ter EHLERS‐DANLOS SYNDROME, MUSCULOCONTRACTURAL TYPE2 23704329 d 1
ESCO2:c.1674‐2A>G chr8 27803304 rs80359869 A G ESCO2 609353 NM_001017420.3:c.1674‐2A>G splice acceptor ROBERTS SYNDROME 16380922 1
FXN:GAA expansion chr9 69037287 N/A GAA GAA>> FXN 606829 NM_000144:GAA expansion N/A FRIEDREICH ATAXIA 8596916 1
GJB2:c.167del chr13 20189414 rs80338942 CA C GJB2 121011 NM_004004.6:c.167del NP_003995.2:p.Leu56fs NONSYNDROMIC DEAFNESS 9285800 1
GNE:c.2228T>C chr9 36217399 rs28937594 A G GNE 603824 NM_001128227.3:c.2228T>C NP_001121699.1:p.Met743Thr INCLUSION BODY MYOPATHY (HIBM) 11528398 3
GPT2:c.159C>G chr16 46906858 rs786203999 C G GPT2 138210 NM_133443.4:c.459C>G NP_597700.1:p.Ser153Arg DEVELOPMENTAL ENCEPHALOPATHY 25758935 1
LIPA:c.260G>T chr10 89228368 rs587778878 C A LIPA 613497 NM_000235.4:c.260G>T NP_000226.2:p.Gly87Val WOLMAN'S DISEASE 21291321 2
NDUFS4:c.355G>C chr5 53658555 rs747359752 G C NDUFS4 602694 NM_002495.4:c.355G>C NP_002486.1:p.Asp119His LEIGH SYNDROME TYPE 1 19364667 1
TYMP:c.433G>A chr22 50528595 rs121913037 C T TYMP 131222 NM_001953.5:c.433G>A NP_001944.1:p.Gly145Arg MNGIE‐MITOCHONDRIAL NEUROGASTROINTESTINAL ENCEPHALOMYOPATHY 9924029 4
USH2A:c.236_239dup chr1 216422097 rs1553258097 G GGTAC USH2A 608400 NM_007123.5:c.236_239dup NP_009054.5:p.Gln81fs USHER SYNDROME TYPE 2A 10738000 4
VAC14:c.2005G>T chr16 70695574 rs1363536856 C A VAC14 604632 NM_018052.5:c.2005G>T NP_060522.3:p.Val669Leu STRIATONIGRAL DEGENERATION 31387860 1

Variants are sorted alphabetically according to gene name.

Abbreviations: N/A, not applicable; PMID, Pubmed ID.

a

Genbank transcript accession number:nucleotide change.

b

Genbank protein accession number:amino acid change.

c

Variant category definitions: (1) Variant identified in family of Syrian Jewish ethnicity; (2) Variant identified in family of Iranian Jewish ethnicity; (3) Variant identified in families of either Syrian or Iranian Jewish ethnicity; (4) Variants recommended for carrier screening in Iranian Jews; (5) Pan‐ethnic variant.

d

Reference describing bi‐allelic loss‐of‐function variant/s in the indicated gene that associate with the indicated phenotype. The given variant is novel but predicted to be loss‐of‐function.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Preliminary assessment of the frequency of disease‐causing variants in Syrian Jews

To assess carrier frequency in Syrian Jews, we genetically tested a small cohort of 438 unrelated individuals of 100% Syrian Jewish descent (all 4 grandparents of Syrian Jewish ancestry) for at least one disease‐causing variant using amplicon sequencing. Table 1 lists 33 pathogenic variants, implicated in 25 different genetic disorders, for which a pathogenic variant was identified in at least one Syrian Jewish individual with 4 Syrian grandparents at Dor Yeshorim. Variant frequencies for Ashkenazi Jews are provided for comparison. We identified relatively high Syrian Jewish carrier frequencies (>0.68%) for well‐established Ashkenazi Jewish variants with carrier frequencies over 2% in Ashkenazi Jews (nonsyndromic deafness‐associated GJB2:c.167del; congenital stationary night blindness‐associated TRPM1:36.8KB DEL; Smith‐Lemli‐Opitz‐associated DHCR7:c.964‐1G>C; and cystic fibrosis‐associated CFTR:c.3846G>A; Table 1). In addition, Syrian Jews carried variants that are less frequent in Ashkenazis and implicated in the following autosomal recessive disorders: achromatopsia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CYP11B1 gene), Friedreich ataxia, Gaucher disease, inclusion body myopathy, metachromatic leukodystrophy, Niemann–Pick disease, primary hyperoxaluria type 1, retinitis pigmentosa 28, and Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy type 1.

3.2. Pathogenic variant selection for in‐depth investigation of allele frequency in Syrian and Iranian Jews

To further expand the generalizability of the results in Table 1, we assembled a larger cohort of 3401 unrelated “mixed” Syrian Jewish (with at least 1 but less than 4 Syrian Jewish grandparents) and 5279 unrelated “mixed” Iranian Jewish individuals for comparison. For this analysis, a set of 22 different disease‐causing pathogenic variants (underlying 20 different diseases) were selected for further investigation (Table 2). For 18 of these variants, at least one family of Syrian and/or Iranian Jewish ancestry approached Dor Yeshorim for assistance with the genetic diagnosis of an affected child or for assistance with premarital screening of a pre‐existing disease in the family. Three other variants were selected based on Israel Ministry of Health recommendations for genetic screening of Iranian Jews; and CFTR:c.1521_1523del was included due to its established pan‐ethnic prevalence (Palomaki et al., 2004; “Worldwide Survey of the Delta F508 Mutation—Report from the Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Analysis Consortium,” 1990). We note that other disease‐causing variants were reported previously in Syrian Jews (Table S1); however, we could not include these variants in our screen because heterozygous control samples for each variant were not available to us for genotyping assay validation. Nonetheless, we summarize these 14 variants underlying 11 different conditions in Table S1 to consolidate established disease‐causing variants in Syrian Jews at the time of this publication.

Within the 22 screened variants, 18 family‐derived variants were further categorized according to the ethnicity of the affected child as “category 1” (Syrian only), “category 2” (Iranian only), or “category 3” (Syrian and Iranian) variants (Table 2). Category 4 variants were included according to Israel Ministry of Health guidelines, and the category 5 variant is the pan‐ethnic CFTR:c.1521_1523del (see Table 2 for categorical variant definitions).

3.3. Carrier frequency in the Syrian and Iranian Jewish populations

To determine the frequency of carriers for the variants in Table 2, mixed Syrian, mixed Iranian, and mixed Ashkenazi Jewish individuals were screened using high throughput amplicon sequencing. Only the Syrian cohort was screened for all 22 variants (20 diseases). The Iranian cohort was screened for only 20 of the 22 variants (18 diseases) because the amplicon sequencing assays for COL6A2:c.1402C>T and FXN:GAA expansion genotyping were not available at the time of the Iranian cohort screen. Table 3 shows an increased frequency of category 1 variant frequency in Syrian Jews compared to Iranian and Ashkenazi Jews (not including the two variants for which no Iranian data was generated, and not including GJB2:c.167del which is much more common in Ashkenazis). On the other hand, category 2 and 4 variant frequencies were higher in Iranians than in Syrians and Ashkenazis (Table 3). These results were expected given the variant selection criteria described above. However, notably the category 3 inclusion body myopathy‐associated GNE:c.2228T>C variant is present in both Iranians (3.81%) and Syrians (0.71%) and much less so in Ashkenazis (0.09%; Table 3) which might explain why Dor Yeshorim previously identified disease‐affected children in both Iranian and Syrian ethnic groups (unlike category 1 variants which were primarily identified in disease affected children of Syrian Jewish ancestry, and unlike category 2 variants for which affected children were exclusively Iranian Jewish). Regarding the pan‐ethnic category 5 CFTR:c.1521_1523del variant, Table 3 shows similar frequency in Syrian (0.56%) and Iranian (0.47%) groups but much higher frequency in Ashkenazis (1.16%). Thus, there are shared alleles between Syrian, Iranian, and Ashkenazi Jews as well as some alleles unique to each group. In addition, we also note that 8.2% of the 3401 mixed Syrians were each carriers for at least one of the pathogenic variants in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

Carrier frequencies in mixed Syrian, Iranian, and Ashkenazi Jewish cohorts

Variant Name Variant category Syrian Jewish carrier frequency (no. carriers/n) Syrian Jewish carrier frequency % Iranian Jewish carrier frequency (no. carriers/n) Iranian Jewish carrier frequency % Ashkenazi Jewish carrier frequency (no. carriers/n) Ashkenazi Jewish carrier frequency %
COL6A2:c.1402C>T 1 56/3401 1.65 ND ND 29/10125 0.29
GJB2:c.167del 1 41/3401 1.21 3/1112 0.27 1078/41414 2.60
FXN:GAA expansion 1 19/3401 0.56 ND ND 26/9208 0.28
CYP11B1:c.992C>T 1 9/3401 0.26 2/3010 0.07 6/60345 0.01
NDUFS4:c.355G>C 1 6/3401 0.18 2/3132 0.06 16/67454 0.02
VAC14:c.2005G>T 1 5/3401 0.15 0/1087 0.00 0/39212 0.00
ESCO2:c.1674‐2A>G 1 4/3401 0.12 0/3010 0.00 7/61630 0.01
CNGB3:c.467C>T 1 4/3401 0.12 3/2904 0.10 37/59336 0.06
BLM:c.98+1G>T 1 1/3401 0.03 0/1088 0.00 1/39219 0.00
ARSA:c.854+3A>G 1 1/3401 0.03 0/3010 0.00 1/61747 0.00
ARSA:c.449C>T 1 1/3401 0.03 0/3236 0.00 8/67953 0.01
AGXT:c.731T>C 1 1/3401 0.03 0/347 0.00 2/27885 0.01
CFTR:c.254G>A 1 0/3401 0.00 1/3576 0.03 4/117781 0.00
GPT2:c.159C>G 1 0/3401 0.00 0/3007 0.00 1/61586 0.00
DSE:c.387delC 1 0/3401 0.00 0/342 0.00 0/27799 0.00
AIRE:c.254A>G 2 9/3401 0.26 55/3761 1.46 18/73327 0.02
LIPA:c.260G>T 2 1/3401 0.03 15/1435 1.05 8/40987 0.02
GNE:c.2228T>C 3 24/3401 0.71 120/3147 3.81 61/67615 0.09
TYMP:c.433G>A 4 4/3401 0.12 34/3747 0.91 10/73272 0.01
USH2A:c.236_239dup 4 2/3401 0.06 18/3588 0.50 10/65282 0.02
CNGA3:c.1585G>A 4 1/3401 0.03 11/3761 0.29 9/73408 0.01
CFTR:c.1521_1523del 5 19/3401 0.56 25/5279 0.47 4303/370954 1.16

Data is shown for unrelated individuals with at least one Syrian Jewish grandparent or at least one Iranian Jewish grandparent or at least one Ashkenazi Jewish grandparent, as indicated.

Abbreviations: N/A, not applicable; ND, no data.

4. DISCUSSION

We report carrier frequencies for pathogenic variants underlying 25 different autosomal recessive diseases in Syrian Jewish individuals. For 3 of the variants (AIRE:c.254A>G [autoimmune polyendocrinopathy], LIPA:c.260G>T [Wolman’s disease], and GNE:c.2228T>C [inclusion body myopathy (HIBM)]), carrier frequency was assayed previously in Mizrahi Jews and found to be similar to the frequencies reported here (Kaback et al., 2010; The Forward Staff, 2014). Most importantly, we show that at least one pathogenic variant was present in 438 Syrian Jews with four Syrian grandparents, and 20 of these variants (underlying 17 different conditions) are present at a population frequency (>0.6%) for which premarital screening would be recommended. In terms of disease severity and allele frequency, the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines recommend that most of these 20 disease‐causing variants should be tested in the Syrian Jewish population (Grody et al., 2013). These criteria include (1) the genetic disorder being tested is severe such that most at‐risk couples would pursue prenatal diagnosis if given the option; (2) a clear association exists between the assayed variant and a severe early onset genetic disorder; and (3) relatively high carrier frequency is present in the tested population such that carrier screening would help to reduce disease incidence. Although these criteria have been met for most of the variants in Tables 1 and 3, for many of these variants (notably COL6A2:c.1402C>T [underlying Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy type 1] which is present in 1.65% of Syrian Jews) carrier frequency had not been described previously in Syrian Jews.

Testing a small cohort of 100% Syrian Jews (descended from 4 Syrian Jewish grandparents) identified 33 disease‐causing variants underlying 25 autosomal recessive conditions. Sixteen of these variants (underlying 13 autosomal recessive conditions) are also present in Ashkenazi Jews. In addition, 22 variants (20 of the 25 conditions) were tested in a larger mixed Syrian Jewish cohort. Predictably, several pathogenic variants were identified with relatively high carrier frequency in both 100% Syrian Jewish and mixed Syrian Jewish cohorts. Thus, the findings of this study suggest that carrier screening could be clinically useful. Based upon our calculated carrier frequencies, 0.82% (82 of 10,000) of Syrian Jewish couples with 4 Syrian grandparents would both be carriers for disease‐causing variants in the same gene for one of 33 variants in 25 genes listed in Table 1. Likewise, carrier frequencies in the mixed Syrian Jewish group show that 0.06% of mixed Syrian Jewish couples (6 out of every 10,000) would both be carriers for disease‐causing variants for one of the 22 variants in 20 genes in Table 3.

All Jewish groups carry pathogenic disease‐causing recessive variants, and Syrian Jews are no exception (Zlotogora, 2014). Moreover, it is becoming increasingly clear that many pathogenic variants previously thought to be exclusive to one Jewish group are present in other Jewish groups. Therefore, these data suggest that more expanded carrier screening panels should be used to address premarital screening in all Jewish groups because what was previously thought to be exclusively an Ashkenazi variant, for example, CFTR:c.3846G>A, is also present in Syrian Jews. Therefore, it is likely that the carrier screening panel will continue to expand as new disease alleles are identified. In addition, it appears that ethnic‐specific screens are less effective, especially given that expanding the number of tested alleles adds minimal cost. Rather a comprehensive pan‐Jewish panel should include variants identified in Jews of all ancestries, especially now that admixture of Jews of different ancestries occurs more frequently.

Based on the findings in this study, Dor Yeshorim has initiated new educational programming to raise awareness about premarital reproductive planning within Syrian Jewish communities. The disease risk within this group is apparent, and carrier screening is recommended by ACOG for all patients.

The relatively short list of variants assessed and reported in this study was not designed to be exhaustive for all conditions that may be recommended for Syrian Jewish carrier screening. We acknowledge that there are other disease‐causing recessive disorders in Syrians that were not included in this study and, accordingly, we list those that are presently known to us based on literature and the Israeli National Genetic Database (“The Israeli National Genetic Database,” n.d.) in Table S1. Notably, we also did not report the Syrian Jewish carrier frequency for SMN1 (MIM#: 600354) for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) even though it is the most common autosomal recessive disease across worldwide populations (Verhaart et al., 2017). This is not to imply that SMA and other recessive diseases are not common in Syrian or Iranian Jews as well. On the contrary, we predict that numerous disease‐causing alleles not described in this report are likely to be present in Syrian Jews with sufficiently high frequency and severity to justify inclusion in premarital screening. However, the goal of this study was not to establish definitive carrier frequencies for all pathogenic variants in Syrian Jews. Instead, we chose a diverse group of variants which were obtained primarily through our work with Syrian families that were affected by genetic diseases for which they had no prior awareness. As we identify these recessive conditions in families in the community, it will be important to increase awareness and to have the infrastructure to disseminate these findings to premarital couples who are likely to be carriers for one or more conditions given the degree of shared ancestry in these small populations.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: D.A.Z., S.Y.S., Y.H., J.E.; Data curation: D.A.Z., C.L., Y.H., T.W.; Formal Analysis: D.A.Z., C.L., Y.H.; Investigation: D.A.Z., W.K.C., C.L., S.Y.S, Y.H., T.W., A.E., J.E.; Methodology: D.A.Z., R.B., Y.K., H.M., R.B.; Resources: A.E., J.E.; Supervision: D.A.Z., A.E., J.E.; Validation: D.A.Z., W.K.C., C.L., R.B., Y.K., H.M., R.B., Y.H., T.W.; Writing – original draft: D.A.Z.; Writing—review & editing: D.A.Z., W.K.C., S.Y.S., Y.H., A.E., J.E.; Approval of final version of manuscript: All authors.

EDITORIAL POLICIES AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Dor Yeshorim institutional review board according to guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. DNA samples were obtained with written informed consent from self‐identified Syrian, Iranian, or Ashkenazi Jewish individuals enrolled in the Dor Yeshorim carrier testing program.

Supporting information

Table S1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases.

Zeevi, D. A., Chung, W. K., Levi, C., Scher, S. Y., Bringer, R., Kahan, Y., Muallem, H., Benel, R., Hirsch, Y., Weiden, T., Ekstein, A., & Ekstein, J. (2021). Recommendation of premarital genetic screening in the Syrian Jewish community based on mutation carrier frequencies within Syrian Jewish cohorts. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 9, e1756. 10.1002/mgg3.1756

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The source data for this study is available upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  1. Akler, G., Birch, A. H., Schreiber‐Agus, N., Cai, X., Cai, G., Shi, L., Yu, C., Larmore, A. M., Mendiratta‐Vij, G., Elkhoury, L., Dillon, M. W., Zhu, J., Mclellan, A. S., Suer, F. E., Webb, B. D., Schadt, E. E., Kornreich, R., & Edelmann, L. (2020). Lessons learned from expanded reproductive carrier screening in self‐reported Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Mizrahi Jewish patients. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 8(2), e1053. 10.1002/mgg3.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atzmon, G., Hao, L. I., Pe'er, I., Velez, C., Pearlman, A., Palamara, P. F., Morrow, B., Friedman, E., Oddoux, C., Burns, E., & Ostrer, H. (2010). Abraham’s children in the genome era: Major Jewish diaspora populations comprise distinct genetic clusters with shared middle eastern ancestry. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(6), 850–859. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloch, T. (2009, August 21). Sephardi Jews lack screening programs for their genetic diseases. The Forward. https://www.haaretz.com/1.5092392 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carmi, S., Hui, K. Y., Kochav, E., Liu, X., Xue, J., Grady, F., Guha, S., Upadhyay, K., Ben‐Avraham, D., Mukherjee, S., Bowen, B. M., Thomas, T., Vijai, J., Cruts, M., Froyen, G., Lambrechts, D., Plaisance, S., Van Broeckhoven, C., Van Damme, P., … Pe’er, I. (2014). Sequencing an Ashkenazi reference panel supports population‐targeted personal genomics and illuminates Jewish and European origins. Nature Communications, 5(1), 4835. 10.1038/ncomms5835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ciotti, P., Di Maria, E., Bellone, E., Ajmar, F., & Mandich, P. (2004). Triplet repeat primed PCR (TP PCR) in molecular diagnostic testing for Friedreich Ataxia. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 6(4), 285–289. 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60523-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Committee Opinion No. 691: Carrier Screening for Genetic Conditions . (2017). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129(3), e41. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dagan, E., & Gershoni‐Baruch, R. (2010). Genetic disorders among Jews from Arab countries. In Teebi A. S. (Ed.), Genetic disorders among Arab populations (pp. 677–702). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-05080-0_23 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dashnow, H., Lek, M., Phipson, B., Halman, A., Sadedin, S., Lonsdale, A., Davis, M., Lamont, P., Clayton, J. S., Laing, N. G., MacArthur, D. G., & Oshlack, A. (2018). STRetch: Detecting and discovering pathogenic short tandem repeat expansions. Genome Biology, 19(1), 121. 10.1186/s13059-018-1505-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekstein, J., & Katzenstein, H. (2001). The Dor Yeshorim story: Community‐based carrier screening for Tay‐Sachs disease. Advances in Genetics, 44, 297–310. 10.1016/s0065-2660(01)44087-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Faust, G. G., & Hall, I. M. (2014). SAMBLASTER: Fast duplicate marking and structural variant read extraction. Bioinformatics, 30(17), 2503–2505. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldschmidt, E., Ronen, A., & Ronen, I. (1960). Changing marriage systems in the Jewish communities of Israel. Annals of Human Genetics, 24(3), 191–204. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1960.tb01732.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grody, W. W., Thompson, B. H., Gregg, A. R., Bean, L. H., Monaghan, K. G., Schneider, A., & Lebo, R. V. (2013). ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine, 15(6), 482–483. 10.1038/gim.2013.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaback, M., Lopatequi, J., Portuges, A. R., Quindipan, C., Pariani, M., Salimpour‐Davidov, N., & Rimoin, D. L. (2010). Genetic screening in the Persian Jewish community: A pilot study. Genetics in Medicine, 12(10), 628–633. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181edef5b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kornreich, R., Ekstein, J., Edelmann, L., & Desnick, R. J. (2004). Premarital and prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: Experience in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Genetics in Medicine, 6(5), 415–420. 10.1097/01.GIM.0000139510.00644.F7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Need, A. C., Kasperavičiũte, D., Cirulli, E. T., & Goldstein, D. B. (2009). A genome‐wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of European Americans. Genome Biology, 10(1), R7. 10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Palomaki, G. E., Fitzsimmons, S. C., & Haddow, J. E. (2004). Clinical sensitivity of prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis via CFTR carrier testing in a United States panethnic population. Genetics in Medicine, 6(5), 405–414. 10.1097/01.GIM.0000139505.06194.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. The Forward Staff . (2014, August 9). All About genetic diseases that strike Sephardic Jews. https://forward.com/culture/203321/all‐about‐genetic‐diseases‐that‐strike‐sephardic‐j/ [Google Scholar]
  18. The Israeli National Genetic Database . (n.d.). The Israeli National Genetic Database. https://medicine.ekmd.huji.ac.il/En/INGD/Pages/default.aspx [Google Scholar]
  19. Verhaart, I. E. C., Robertson, A., Wilson, I. J., Aartsma‐Rus, A., Cameron, S., Jones, C. C., Cook, S. F., & Lochmüller, H. (2017). Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q–linked spinal muscular atrophy—A literature review. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 12(1), 124. 10.1186/s13023-017-0671-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Worldwide survey of the delta F508 mutation—Report from the cystic fibrosis genetic analysis consortium. (1990). American Journal of Human Genetics, 47(2), 354–359. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zlotogora, J. (2014). Genetics and genomic medicine in Israel. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, 2(2), 85–94. 10.1002/mgg3.73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zlotogora, J. (2019). The Israeli national population program of genetic carrier screening for reproductive purposes. How should it be continued? Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 8(1), 73. 10.1186/s13584-019-0345-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Data Availability Statement

The source data for this study is available upon reasonable request.


Articles from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES