Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Aug 30;100(5):1132–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.08.017

A third injection of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients improves the humoral immune response

Christophe Masset 1,2,, Clarisse Kerleau 1,2, Claire Garandeau 1, Simon Ville 1,2, Diego Cantarovich 1, Maryvonne Hourmant 1,2, Delphine Kervella 1,2, Aurélie Houzet 1, Cécile Guillot-Gueguen 1, Irène Guihard 1, Magali Giral 1,2, Jacques Dantal 1,2, Gilles Blancho 1,2
PMCID: PMC8404389  PMID: 34474075

To the editor:

Several reports have highlighted the poor humoral immune response of kidney transplant recipients following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination compared with immunocompetent patients.1, 2, 3 Therefore, the French National Authority for Health has recommended the use of a third vaccine dose for immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients. We retrospectively assessed the humoral response of all kidney and pancreas transplant recipients vaccinated with the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine between January and May 2021 in our center. Patients with previous COVID-19 infection or positive prevaccination serology were excluded. The methods for detection of the anti-spike protein responses were dependent on laboratories’ practices and included chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Abbott Architect), chemiluminescence immunoassay (Siemens Atellica), and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Elecsys). Anti-spike (IgG) responses were assessed 1 month after the second and third injection, and patients were considered positive if their anti-spike level was above the laboratory threshold. A total of 456 patients had a serologic assessment 1 month after the second injection, of whom 227 were positive, representing 49.7% of our cohort (Table 1 ). A total of 10.7% of these patients had a positive anti-spike protein 1 month after the first injection. Multivariate regression analysis (Table 2 ) revealed that there was an increased likelihood of being a nonresponder after the second mRNA injection for patients treated with antimetabolite drugs (odds ratio [OR], 5.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.99–11.48; P < 0.0001) or steroids (OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 2.10–6.66; P < 0.0001), older recipients (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.06; P = 0.0010), those with impaired allograft function (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96–0.99; P = 0.0011), and those with a transplant ≤4 years (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.70–5.08; P = 0.0001). A total of 136 patients had a serologic assessment 1 month after the third injection (median, 30 days; quartile 1, 28 days; quartile 3, 32 days). The average time between the second and the third injection was 50 days. A total of 94 patients were positive, representing a 69.2% serologic conversion following the third mRNA injection (Figure 1 a and Table 3 ). Among patients receiving a third dose, 85 had a serologic assessment after both second and third injections, and 34 of them (40%) became seropositive between the second and the third dose. The magnitude of immune response was investigated in 71 patients who had serologic assessment using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Elecsys) after the second and third injections (Figure 1b and c). Nearly all patients with a positive serology after the second mRNA vaccine had a high titer of anti-spike antibody (>250 UI/L). Multivariate regression analysis (Table 4 ) determined that lymphocyte count <1500/mm3 increased the likelihood of being a nonresponder after the third mRNA injection (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.58–19.96; P = 0.0039), as impairment of allograft function (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99; P = 0.0232). Of note, the use of antiproliferative drugs and steroids no longer seemed to significantly impact the serologic conversion after the third mRNA vaccine injection. Male recipients were more likely to respond to the third mRNA vaccine injection in our cohort, without any clear explanation so far. Kidney transplant recipients respond poorly to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, and although cellular responses to the vaccine seem better than humoral responses,4 severe COVID-19 pneumonia can occur following 2 mRNA vaccine injections.5 Our data support the use of a third mRNA injection to improve the humoral response to vaccination from about 50% to 70%, reducing the negative impact of antimetabolite drugs and steroids on seroconversion. Moreover, for previously seropositive patients, the third mRNA vaccine largely improved the intensity of humoral response, reaching titers suggestive of neutralizing antibody activity. Indeed, seropositive assessment (especially weak titers in immunocompromised patients) is not constantly associated with protective antibodies titers.5 However, severe lymphopenia and impaired graft function remained as risk factors for a nonserologic response. In this particular situation, a fourth dose, with or without immunomodulation, could be discussed to improve the humoral response of this highly immunosuppressed population. These data will need confirmation from other series.

Table 1.

Characteristics associated with risk of nonhumoral response to a second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine after univariate analysis (n = 456)

Characteristics Global (n = 456)
Negative (n = 229)
Positive (n = 227)
P value
NA n % NA n % NA n %
Transplantation ≤4 yr 0 336 73.7 0 146 63.8 0 190 83.7 <0.0001
Male recipient 0 275 60.3 0 130 56.8 0 145 63.9 0.1455
Transplant rank ≥2 0 81 17.8 0 40 17.5 0 41 18.1 0.9653
Transplant type (kidney vs. SPK/pancreas) 0 421 92.3 0 214 93.4 0 207 91.2 0.3845
Primitive kidney disease 0 0 0 0.5491
 Unknown 39 8.6 15 6.6 24 10.6
 Glomerulonephritis 143 31.4 71 31 72 31.7
 Other 205 45 109 47.6 96 42.3
 Vascular disease 28 6.1 13 5.7 15 6.6
 Diabetes 41 9 21 9.2 20 8.8
Deceased donor 0 376 82.5 0 196 85.6 0 180 79.3 0.1002
ABDR incompatibilities >4 0 102 22.4 0 59 25.8 0 43 18.9 0.0920
Blood type 0 0 0 0.4043
 O 192 42.1 102 44.5 90 39.6
 A 206 45.2 103 45 103 45.4
 B 46 10.1 18 7.9 28 12.3
 AB 12 2.6 6 2.6 6 2.6
Depleting induction 1 239 52.5 1 129 56.6 0 110 48.5 0.1009
Lymphocytes <1500/mm3 36 220 52.4 20 126 60.3 16 94 44.5 0.0017
Calcineurin inhibitor treatment 20 369 84.6 11 191 87.6 9 178 81.7 0.1110
Belatacept treatment 18 11 2.6 10 9 4.4 8 2 0.9 0.0343
mTOR inhibitor treatment 20 68 15.6 11 20 9.2 9 48 22 <0.0001
Antimetabolite treatment 20 325 74.5 11 180 82.6 9 145 66.5 0.0002
Steroid treatment 20 150 34.4 11 94 43.1 9 56 25.7 0.0002
Diabetes history 0 79 17.3 0 46 20.1 0 33 14.5 0.1493
Cardiovascular history 0 179 39.3 0 94 41 0 85 37.4 0.4890
Neoplasia history 0 89 19.5 0 54 23.6 0 35 15.4 0.0375
DSA before transplant 136 21 6.6 47 16 8.8 89 5 3.6 0.1050
DSA de novo 6 56 12.4 5 26 11.6 1 30 13.3 0.6944
Episode of rejection
0
51
11.2
0
30
13.1
0
21
9.3
0.2479

NA
Mean
SD
NA
Mean
SD
NA
Mean
SD

Recipient age, yr 0 61.4 12.1 0 62.7 11.1 0 60.2 13.0 0.0289
Recipient BMI, kg/m2 31 25.4 4.9 16 25.5 4.8 15 25.4 5.0 0.7514
Time from transplantation, yr 0 10.5 8.5 0 8.5 7.6 0 12.4 8.9 <0.0001
Allograft function by MDRD, ml/min 24 48.7 19.4 14 43.4 16.8 10 53.9 20.3 <0.0001
Total leukocyte count, G/L 30 32.1 376.2 18 57.9 534.0 12 6.7 2.0 0.1653
C0 cyclosporine, ng/ml 419 100.6 35.9 218 99.5 50.3 201 101.1 29.0 0.9217
C0 tacrolimus, ng/ml 193 5.9 1.9 83 6.1 2.0 110 5.6 1.7 0.0239

BMI, body mass index; C0, trough level; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; DSA, donor-specific antibody; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; NA, not available; SPK, simultaneous pancreas–kidney.

Values in bold are significant (P < 0.05).

Table 2.

Characteristics associated with risk of nonhumoral response to a second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine after multivariate analysis (n = 394)

Characteristics OR 95% CI P value
Recipient age at vaccination, yr 1.03 1.01–1.06 0.0010
Transplantation ≤4 yr 2.91 1.70–5.08 0.0001
Allograft function by MDRD, ml/min 0.98 0.96–0.99 0.0011
Calcineurin inhibitor treatment 1.55 0.73–3.30 0.2555
mTOR inhibitor treatment 0.73 0.33–1.62 0.4402
Antimetabolite treatment 5.74 2.99–11.48 <0.0001
Steroid treatment 3.68 2.10–6.66 <0.0001
Lymphocytes <1500/mm3 1.48 0.93–2.35 0.0961

CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; OR, odds ratio.

Values in bold are significant (P < 0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Prevalence of anti-spike IgG seroconversion following 1, 2, and 3 mRNA injections in kidney transplant recipients. (b) Antibodies titers (electrochemiluminescence immunoassay by Roche Elecsys) 1 month after the second and third mRNA injections. (c) The evolution of antibody titers in previously positive patients who received a third mRNA injection.

Table 3.

Characteristics associated with risk of nonhumoral response to a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine after univariate analysis (n = 136)

Characteristics Global (n = 136)
Negative (n = 42)
Positive (n = 94)
P value
NA n % NA n % NA n %
Transplantation ≤4 yr 0 46 33.8 0 20 47.6 0 26 27.7 0.0378
Male recipient 0 86 63.2 0 17 40.5 0 69 73.4 <0.0001
Transplant rank ≥2 0 20 14.7 0 8 19.0 0 12 12.8 0.4879
Transplant type (kidney vs. SPK/pancreas) 0 124 91.2 0 38 90.5 0 86 91.5 1.0000
Primitive kidney disease 0 0 0 0.6077
 Unknown 10 7.4 5 11.9 5 5.3
 Glomerulonephritis 44 32.4 12 28.6 32 34
 Other 54 39.7 15 35.7 39 41.5
 Vascular disease 12 8.8 4 9.5 8 8.5
 Diabetes 16 11.8 6 14.3 10 10.6
Deceased donor 0 114 83.8 0 37 88.1 0 77 81.9 0.5142
ABDR incompatibilities >4 0 33 24.3 0 12 28.6 0 21 22.3 0.5167
Blood type 0 0 0 0.4838
 O 52 38.2 20 47.6 32 34
 A 66 48.5 18 42.9 48 51.1
 B 14 10.3 3 7.1 11 11.7
 AB 4 2.9 1 2.4 3 3.2
Depleting induction 0 80 58.8 0 29 69 0 51 54.3 0.1525
Lymphocytes <1500/mm3 6 65 50 2 29 72.5 4 36 40 0.0012
Calcineurin inhibitor treatment 2 115 85.8 1 36 87.8 1 79 84.9 0.8662
mTOR inhibitor treatment 2 20 14.9 1 2 4.9 1 18 19.4 0.0569
Antimetabolite treatment 2 101 75.4 1 32 78 1 69 74.2 0.7950
Steroid treatment 2 43 32.1 1 18 43.9 1 25 26.9 0.0811
Diabetes history 0 28 20.6 0 11 26.2 0 17 18.1 0.3950
Cardiovascular history 0 56 41.2 0 17 40.5 0 39 41.5 1.0000
Neoplasia history 0 29 21.3 0 12 28.6 0 17 18.1 0.2490
DSA before transplant 35 8 7.9 8 4 11.8 27 4 6 0.4370
DSA de novo 5 17 13 2 6 15 3 11 12.1 0.8615
Episode of rejection
0
13
9.6
0
6
14.3
0
7
7.4
0.2207

NA
Mean
SD
NA
Mean
SD
NA
Mean
SD

Recipient age, yr 0 63.7 11.7 0 65.3 10.9 0 63.0 11.9 0.2679
Recipient BMI, kg/m2 3 25.5 4.7 1 24.5 3.7 2 25.9 5.0 0.0642
Time from transplantation, yr 0 9.4 8.1 0 7.0 6.7 0 10.4 8.5 0.0143
Allograft function by MDRD, ml/min 3 49.1 19.3 1 41.1 15.1 2 52.6 20.0 0.0004
Total leukocyte count, G/L 5 6.6 2.2 1 6.7 2.4 4 6.5 2.2 0.7306
C0 cyclosporine, ng/ml 125 103.0 25.0 40 129.0 29.7 85 97.2 21.5 0.3526
C0 tacrolimus, ng/ml 55 6.0 1.8 13 6.2 1.9 42 5.9 1.8 0.5758

BMI, body mass index; C0, trough level; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; DSA, donor-specific antibody; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; NA, not available; SPK, simultaneous pancreas–kidney.

Values in bold are significant (P < 0.05).

Table 4.

Characteristics associated with risk of nonhumoral response to a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine after multivariate analysis (n = 129)

Characteristics OR 95% CI P value
Male recipient 0.25 0.10–0.61 0.0027
Allograft function by MDRD, ml/min 0.97 0.94–0.99 0.0232
Antimetabolite treatment 1.76 0.59–5.64 0.3237
Steroid treatment 2.45 0.91–6.81 0.0795
Lymphocytes <1500/mm3 3.84 1.58–9.96 0.0039

CI, confidence interval; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; OR, odds ratio.

Values in bold are significant (P < 0.05).

References

  • 1.Benotmane I., Gautier-Vargas G., Cognard N. Low immunization rates among kidney transplant recipients who received 2 doses of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Kidney Int. 2021;99:1498–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marion O., Del Bello A., Abravanel F. Safety and immunogenicity of anti–SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines in recipients of solid organ transplants. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:1336–1338. doi: 10.7326/M21-1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Müller L., Andrée M., Moskorz W. Age-dependent immune response to the Biontech/Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination [e-pub ahead of print]. Clin Infect Dis. Accessed September 14, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Cucchiari D., Egri N., Bodro M. Cellular and humoral response after mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:2727–2739. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caillard S., Chavarot N., Bertrand D. Occurrence of severe COVID-19 in vaccinated transplant patients. Kidney Int. 2021;100:477–479. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Kidney International are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES