As B cells mature to plasma cells, they lose expression of the B-cell antigen receptor and become dependent on interactions with the microenvironment to sustain survival. In a Blood Spotlight, Ren et al review the central role of plasma cell syndecan-1 (CD138) and other stromal heparan sulfate-proteoglycans in the marrow microenvironment in supporting both normal and malignant cells, and they discuss how this pathway can be targeted for potential therapy for multiple myeloma.
Visual Abstract
Abstract
Plasma cells no longer express a B-cell antigen receptor and are hence deprived of signals crucial for survival throughout B-cell development. Instead, normal plasma cells, as well as their malignant myeloma counterparts, heavily rely on communication with the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment for survival. The plasma cell heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) syndecan-1 (CD138) and HSPGs in the BM microenvironment act as master regulators of this communication by co-opting specific growth and survival factors from the BM niche. This designates syndecan-1/HSPGs and their synthesis machinery as potential treatment targets in multiple myeloma.
Introduction
From the pre–B-cell stage onward, all steps of B-cell development critically depend on membrane expression of the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR), which provides essential signals for B-cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation.1,2 Upon plasma cell differentiation, however, the BCR is no longer membrane expressed but secreted as immunoglobulin. The consequent loss of BCR-derived survival signals necessitates a complete makeover of the cellular signaling-machinery to enable plasma cells to survive. As discussed in this review, the transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) syndecan-1/CD138 is an essential component of this B-cell to plasma cell metamorphosis. In collaboration with HSPGs expressed by bone marrow (BM) stromal cells, syndecan-1 allows normal and myeloma plasma cells to efficiently co-opt soluble factors produced by cells in the BM niche. This promotes plasma cell homing/retention and survival, as well as multiple myeloma (MM) tumor growth. Strategies to target HSPG/syndecan-1 in MM are discussed.
HSPGs
HSPGs are proteins with ≥1 covalently attached HS glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains, which in the native form consist of alternating N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and D-glucuronic acid (GlcA) units.3,4 These macro-molecules are expressed in all mammalian tissues as extracellular matrix components (eg, perlecan) or as cell membrane–bound glycoproteins (eg, syndecans and glypicans). To execute their function, the HS chains undergo a complex series of modifications, comprising N-deacetylation/N-sulfation, epimerization, and O-sulfation at different positions (Figure 1A). This endows HS chains with highly modified domains, which provide specific docking sites for a large number of bioactive molecules. Binding of these ligands, such as growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, serves a variety of functions, ranging from immobilization and concentration to distinct modulation of signaling, facilitating the formation of receptor complexes (Figure 1B).5-11 By regulating the activity of these protein ligands, HSPGs mediate important biological processes, including cell growth, adhesion, migration, angiogenesis, and tissue remodeling, which are activities crucial in, among others, the control of embryonic development and immunity and the pathogenesis of cancer.4,10,12-14
Syndecan-1 in the metamorphosis of B cells to plasma cells
During terminal differentiation, B-lineage cells acquire syndecan-1 as an integral part of the plasmacytic gene expression program, driven by the transcription factors Blimp-1 and XBP1.15 Syndecan-1 is a transmembrane HSPG and is used in clinical practice as canonical marker for normal and myeloma plasma cells. Functional studies have unequivocally demonstrated that syndecan-1 is crucial for effective communication of plasma cells with their BM niche, acting as a versatile coreceptor for chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors, mediating plasma cell homing, survival, and, in MM, tumor growth.13,16-18 A landmark study by McCarron et al18 demonstrated that mice with a B lineage–intrinsic syndecan-1 deletion show a defective long-term humoral immunity. This defect could be traced to the inability of syndecan-1–negative plasma cells to respond to interleukin-6 (IL-6)- and a proliferation-induced ligand (APRIL)–mediated survival signals. Attenuated APRIL signaling has similarly been implicated in the humoral immune defect of mice deficient in Glce, encoding the HS-modifying enzyme glucoronyl-C5-epimerase.19 This enzyme converts D-glucuronic acid (GlcA) into its stereo-isomer L-iduronic acid (IdoA), thereby enhancing the flexibility of the HS chain, which provides access for ligands to specific binding regions.19,20 Mice with a B lineage–intrinsic Glce deletion displayed diminished antibody levels and plasma cell numbers, whereas Glce-deficient plasma cells were unable to bind APRIL and failed to respond to APRIL-mediated survival signals.19
These studies show that the activity of IL-6 and APRIL, credibly the 2 foremost prosurvival factors for long-lived plasma cells, is controlled by syndecan-1 and requires specific HS chain modifications. For IL-6, the exact mode of interaction with syndecan-1 has not yet been defined, but for tumor necrosis family growth factor APRIL, the mechanism is firmly established. APRIL is secreted in the BM microenvironment by various cell types, including osteoclasts,21 eosinophils,22 and megakaryocytes,23,24 and binds the HS moieties of syndecan-1 via its N-terminal lysine-rich region. This leaves the tumor necrosis factor–like region of APRIL free to interact with the receptors' B-cell maturation antigen and transmembrane activator and calcium-modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor.8,25 Interestingly, unlike its close relative B-cell activating factor, which automultimerizes, APRIL strictly requires interaction with HS moieties to form multimers at the plasma cell membrane and generate signals that mediate plasma cell longevity.26,27 This HS dependency defines APRIL as a plasma cell survival factor specifically designed to collaborate with syndecan-1.
Syndecan-1 in the pathogenesis of MM
In addition to its physiologic role in plasma cells, syndecan-1 also plays a key role in the pathogenesis of MM, promoting tumor cell survival and proliferation. By using a SCID-hu mouse xenotransplant model, Yang et al28 demonstrated that knockdown of syndecan-1 strongly attenuates MM growth. Treatment with bacterial heparinase III, an enzyme that degrades HS, also inhibited tumor growth, suggesting involvement of the HS moieties of syndecan-1. The key role of these HS chains was corroborated by Reijmers et al,17 using short hairpin RNAs targeting EXT1, an enzyme crucial for HS chain synthesis. EXT1 knockdown, and consequent loss of cell surface HS, completely prevented the outgrowth of MM xenotransplants, whereas EXT1 knockdown in already established MM xenotransplants resulted in massive tumor necrosis.17 Furthermore, in a murine MM model, treatment with an anti–syndecan-1 antibody enhanced sensitivity to bortezomib chemotherapy.29 Together, these studies show the critical importance of syndecan-1 for MM cell survival and growth and provide proof of concept for the therapeutic potential of strategies targeting syndecan-1 or its HS chains.
In line with its role in mediating plasma cell survival, syndecan-1 promotes, or is even essential, for the activity of many MM survival/growth factors. These include the already discussed major plasma cell survival factors IL-6 and APRIL,25,30 but, in addition, comprise factors that are aberrantly expressed by MM cells or by the microenvironment, acting as auto- and/or paracrine growth factors. These mediators include hepatocyte growth factor (HGF),7,31 insulin-like growth factor-1,32 and several epidermal growth factor (EGF) family proteins with HS-binding properties, including heparin-binding EGF, neuregulin-1, and amphiregulin.9,33 Interaction of these factors with the HS moieties of syndecan-1 enhances RAS/MAPK and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway activation, thereby promoting MM cell growth and survival.7,9,31-33
A distinct oncogenic signaling pathway that also involves syndecan-1 is Wnt/β-catenin signaling.34 Aberrant Wnt signaling, activated by auto- and paracrine Wnt ligands, is common in MM and promotes tumor growth, acting upstream of c-MYC and cyclin D1.35-39 We recently demonstrated that syndecan-1 binds Wnts and R-spondins, produced in the BM microenvironment by MM cells, bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), and osteoblasts. This binding, which involves the HS moieties of syndecan-1, facilitates the interaction of these ligands with their respective receptors (ie, with Frizzleds and LGR4),11 thereby enhancing Wnt signaling and proliferation.
Notably, the tumorigenic role of syndecan-1 in MM is not restricted to its function as a membrane-bound signaling mediator: MM cells show strongly enhanced syndecan-1 shedding, promoted by heparanase, resulting in accumulation of syndecan-1 and of HS cleavage products in the BM microenvironment, stimulating migration, and acting as reservoir for survival/growth factors.28,40-42 Importantly, these factors do not only comprise mediators that directly interact with MM cells but also factors like fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor, which promote angiogenesis and, hence, contribute to a tumor-permissive microenvironment.43-45
Apart from mediating tumor growth and survival, syndecan-1 has also been implicated in osteolytic bone disease, a major MM disease complication causing severe morbidity. Osteolytic lesions in MM are initiated by a disturbed balance between osteoblast-mediated bone formation and bone resorption by osteoclasts, a balance that is critically dependent on the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL)/RANK pathway, which controls osteoclast activity.46 Interestingly, syndecan-1 on the MM cell surface was shown to bind, internalize, and degrade the RANKL antagonist osteoprotegerin, thereby promoting RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis, osteoclast activity, and osteolysis.47 Furthermore, RANKL/RANK-mediated osteoclast activity may also be promoted by soluble syndecan-1: Shed syndecan-1 was reported to bind HGF and to promote HGF/MET signaling in osteoblasts, leading to enhanced RANKL expression and osteoclastogenesis.48,49
HSPGs expressed by cells in the plasma cell and MM BM niche
HSPGs are not only expressed by normal and MM plasma cells but also by BMSCs, endothelial cells, and osteoblasts,50-52 and, interestingly, have been implicated in controlling the homing of hematopoietic progenitor cells to, and retention, in the BM.50,53 Within this microenvironment, long-lived plasma cells are located in close contact with BMSCs expressing high levels of the chemokine CXCL12, also referred to as CXCL12 abundant reticular (CAR) cells.54 These niche cells strongly express HSPGs55,56; however, the role of these HSPGs in the interaction of normal and MM plasma cells with the BM niche has remained unexplored. We recently found that human CAR-like (HS5) cells constitutively carry HS-bound CXCL12 on their cell surface. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of the HS polymerase EXT1 led to loss of HS and a concurrent loss of membrane-bound CXCL12. This strongly attenuated the ability of the CAR cells to support adhesion of MM cells and protect these cells from bortezomib-induced death. Interestingly, the γ-isoform of CXCL12 was found to control these interactions.57 Unlike the commonly studied CXCL12 isoform CXCL12α, CXCL12γ possesses an extended C-terminal domain, which contains 3 positively charged BBXB motives that convey an extraordinarily high affinity for HS,58,59 explaining its membrane retention on secretion. These findings suggest an intriguing scenario in which differences in affinity for HS entail various CXCL12 isoforms with distinct roles in the regulation of plasma and MM cell homing and retention in the BM: unlike CXCL12α, which creates a chemo-attractive gradient guiding plasmablasts and MM cells to their BM niches, the membrane-bound CXCL12γ isoform may function as a niche chemokine, controlling plasma and MM cell adhesion/retention, survival, and proliferation. Further studies are needed to explore this scenario.
Syndecan-1/HSPGs and their synthesis machinery as targets for the treatment of MM
The important role of HSPGs in the biology of MM and other human cancers designates HSPGs and their synthesis and modification enzymes as potential therapeutic targets. Possible targeting strategies include monoclonal antibodies directed against HSPG core proteins or HS side chains, various heparin mimetics to block HSPG–ligand interaction, and small molecule inhibitors targeting enzymes involved in HS synthesis or modification. Although preclinical studies have provided robust prove of concept for the feasibility and therapeutic potential of these strategies, clinical translation is still largely limited to early phase studies.
The antibody–drug conjugate indatuximab ravtansine (BT062), targeting the syndecan-1 core protein, was shown to inhibit tumor growth in a MM xenograft model, leading to prolonged host survival.60 In this setting, BT062 acts additively, or even synergistically, with clinically approved therapies for MM.61 In a first-in-human clinical phase 1/2a study, in 32 patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM, more than 75% of heavily pretreated patients achieved stable disease or better, with minor and partial responses occurring in 14.7% of patients, supporting further investigation as part of a combination regimen.62 Indeed, a phase 1/2a clinical study in relapsed and refractory MM with BT062, in combination with lenalidomide or pomalidomide and dexamethasone, has been completed, but the results have not yet been reported (NCT01638936). In addition, CAR T cells incorporating the single chain variable fragment (scFv) of BT062 have been generated and have shown safety and therapeutic efficacy in a mouse myeloma xenotransplant model.63 Based on these findings, a phase 1 clinical study with these CD138 CAR T cells has been initiated in patients with refractory and relapsed MM (NCT03672319).
Heparin, a highly sulfated form of HS, has been previously shown to have potent antitumor activity in several experimental and clinical studies, but its strong anticoagulant activity has impeded its use as an antitumor drug.44,64 This has incited the development of several heparin mimetics with reduced anticoagulant activity. These compounds function by inhibiting heparanase and by competing with HS for binding of essential growth and survival factors.64,65 The heparin mimetic roneparstat (SST0001) has been shown to inhibit myeloma growth in xenograft models by disrupting of the heparanase–syndecan-1 axis.66,67 Additional preclinical studies demonstrated that roneparstat reduced MM-induced osteoclast differentiation and bone destruction and repressed myeloma cell stemness and drug resistance.68,69 A phase 1 clinical study with roneparstat in patients with advanced MM has recently been completed (NCT01764880). The results show a favorable safety profile but very limited antitumor activity as single agent.70
In addition to the HSPG itself, the enzymes of the HS synthesis and modification machinery present potentially promising therapeutic targets. HSPG sulfation in particular, is a major determinant of the affinity and specificity of the interaction of protein ligands with HS.3,10,71 Interestingly, the small molecule inhibitor OKN-007, which targets Sulf-2, an enzyme regulating HS sulfation, has antitumor activity in several different types of cancer.72-75 Recently, a phase 2 clinical study with this compound has been initiated in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (NCT04388475).
Conclusions and perspectives
Syndecan-1, in concert with HSPGs expressed by BMSCs, plays a pivotal role in the interaction of normal and MM plasma cells with the BM niche, by co-opting chemokines, cytokines, and growth/survival factors, which endorse the homing, adhesion/retention, and survival of normal plasma cells, and mediate MM cell growth and drug resistance (Figure 2).
Preclinical studies have provided robust prove of concept for therapeutic efficacy of targeting syndecan-1/HSPGs, as well as some of the enzymes involved in HS chain modification, in various types of cancer, including MM. The thus far limited data from early phase clinical studies suggest that targeting of HSPGs is well tolerated, but further studies are needed to allow a verdict regarding therapeutic efficacy.
For the design of future therapeutics, the fact that distinct HS chain modifications create binding sites for specific ligands is of particular relevance. Characterization of the HS modifications that facilitate binding of crucial MM growth and survival factors, such as APRIL, IL-6, and WNTs, will not only define these HS motives but also identify the enzymes responsible for their synthesis. This knowledge can be exploited to design (allosteric) inhibitors interfering with the HS–ligand interaction, as well as small molecule inhibitors targeting specific HS-modifying enzymes, a strategy that may finetune and improve the clinical safety and efficacy of syndecan-1/HSPG targeted therapies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Dutch Cancer Society and Lymph&Co (S.T.P. and M.S.) and a scholarship from the China Scholarship Council (Z.R.).
Authorship
Contribution: Z.R., M.S., and S.T.P. wrote the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Steven T. Pals, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Loc. AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; e-mail: s.t.pals@amsterdamumc.nl; and Zemin Ren, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Loc. AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; e-mail: renzemin12@hotmail.com.
REFERENCES
- 1.Lam KP, Kühn R, Rajewsky K. In vivo ablation of surface immunoglobulin on mature B cells by inducible gene targeting results in rapid cell death. Cell. 1997;90(6):1073-1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Srinivasan L, Sasaki Y, Calado DP, et al. PI3 kinase signals BCR-dependent mature B cell survival. Cell. 2009;139(3):573-586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Esko JD, Lindahl U. Molecular diversity of heparan sulfate. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(2):169-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Esko JD, Selleck SB. Order out of chaos: assembly of ligand binding sites in heparan sulfate. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71(1):435-471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rapraeger AC, Krufka A, Olwin BB. Requirement of heparan sulfate for bFGF-mediated fibroblast growth and myoblast differentiation. Science. 1991;252(5013):1705-1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pellegrini L, Burke DF, von Delft F, Mulloy B, Blundell TL. Crystal structure of fibroblast growth factor receptor ectodomain bound to ligand and heparin. Nature. 2000;407(6807):1029-1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Derksen PW, Keehnen RM, Evers LM, van Oers MH, Spaargaren M, Pals ST. Cell surface proteoglycan syndecan-1 mediates hepatocyte growth factor binding and promotes Met signaling in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2002;99(4):1405-1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hendriks J, Planelles L, de Jong-Odding J, et al. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding promotes APRIL-induced tumor cell proliferation. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12(6):637-648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mahtouk K, Cremer FW, Rème T, et al. Heparan sulphate proteoglycans are essential for the myeloma cell growth activity of EGF-family ligands in multiple myeloma. Oncogene. 2006;25(54):7180-7191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sarrazin S, Lamanna WC, Esko JD. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(7):a004952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ren Z, van Andel H, de Lau W, et al. Syndecan-1 promotes Wnt/β-catenin signaling in multiple myeloma by presenting Wnts and R-spondins. Blood. 2018;131(9):982-994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Häcker U, Nybakken K, Perrimon N. Heparan sulphate proteoglycans: the sweet side of development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(7):530-541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reijmers RM, Spaargaren M, Pals ST. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans in the control of B cell development and the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. FEBS J. 2013;280(10):2180-2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Knelson EH, Nee JC, Blobe GC. Heparan sulfate signaling in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39(6):277-288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shaffer AL, Shapiro-Shelef M, Iwakoshi NN, et al. XBP1, downstream of Blimp-1, expands the secretory apparatus and other organelles, and increases protein synthesis in plasma cell differentiation. Immunity. 2004;21(1):81-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sanderson RD, Yang Y. Syndecan-1: a dynamic regulator of the myeloma microenvironment. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25(2):149-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reijmers RM, Groen RW, Rozemuller H, et al. Targeting EXT1 reveals a crucial role for heparan sulfate in the growth of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010;115(3):601-604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McCarron MJ, Park PW, Fooksman DR. CD138 mediates selection of mature plasma cells by regulating their survival. Blood. 2017;129(20):2749-2759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reijmers RM, Groen RW, Kuil A, et al. Disruption of heparan sulfate proteoglycan conformation perturbs B-cell maturation and APRIL-mediated plasma cell survival. Blood. 2011;117(23):6162-6171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mulloy B, Forster MJ. Conformation and dynamics of heparin and heparan sulfate. Glycobiology. 2000;10(11):1147-1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moreaux J, Cremer FW, Reme T, et al. The level of TACI gene expression in myeloma cells is associated with a signature of microenvironment dependence versus a plasmablastic signature. Blood. 2005;106(3):1021-1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chu VT, Fröhlich A, Steinhauser G, et al. Eosinophils are required for the maintenance of plasma cells in the bone marrow. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(2):151-159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bonci D, Hahne M, Felli N, Peschle C, De Maria R. Potential role of APRIL as autocrine growth factor for megakaryocytopoiesis. Blood. 2004;104(10):3169-3172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kometani K, Kurosaki T. Differentiation and maintenance of long-lived plasma cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;33:64-69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moreaux J, Sprynski AC, Dillon SR, et al. APRIL and TACI interact with syndecan-1 on the surface of multiple myeloma cells to form an essential survival loop. Eur J Haematol. 2009;83(2):119-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kimberley FC, van Bostelen L, Cameron K, et al. The proteoglycan (heparan sulfate proteoglycan) binding domain of APRIL serves as a platform for ligand multimerization and cross-linking. FASEB J. 2009;23(5):1584-1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kimberley F, Guadagnoli M, van Eenennaam H, Medema JP. A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL): the development of antagonistic agents as potential therapeutics and deciphering the role of heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in APRIL signalling. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011;691:501-506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang Y, MacLeod V, Dai Y, et al. The syndecan-1 heparan sulfate proteoglycan is a viable target for myeloma therapy. Blood. 2007;110(6):2041-2048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Akhmetzyanova I, McCarron MJ, Parekh S, Chesi M, Bergsagel PL, Fooksman DR. Dynamic CD138 surface expression regulates switch between myeloma growth and dissemination. Leukemia. 2020;34(1):245-256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tai YT, Acharya C, An G, et al. APRIL and BCMA promote human multiple myeloma growth and immunosuppression in the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 2016;127(25):3225-3236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Derksen PW, de Gorter DJ, Meijer HP, et al. The hepatocyte growth factor/Met pathway controls proliferation and apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2003;17(4):764-774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beauvais DM, Jung O, Yang Y, Sanderson RD, Rapraeger AC. Syndecan-1 (CD138) Suppresses apoptosis in multiple myeloma by activating IGF1 receptor: prevention by synstatinIGF1R inhibits tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2016;76(17):4981-4993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mahtouk K, Jourdan M, De Vos J, et al. An inhibitor of the EGF receptor family blocks myeloma cell growth factor activity of HB-EGF and potentiates dexamethasone or anti-IL-6 antibody-induced apoptosis. Blood. 2004;103(5):1829-1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alexander CM, Reichsman F, Hinkes MT, et al. Syndecan-1 is required for Wnt-1-induced mammary tumorigenesis in mice. Nat Genet. 2000;25(3):329-332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Derksen PW, Tjin E, Meijer HP, et al. Illegitimate WNT signaling promotes proliferation of multiple myeloma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(16):6122-6127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sukhdeo K, Mani M, Zhang Y, et al. Targeting the beta-catenin/TCF transcriptional complex in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(18):7516-7521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chim CS, Pang R, Fung TK, Choi CL, Liang R. Epigenetic dysregulation of Wnt signaling pathway in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2007;21(12):2527-2536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.van Andel H, Ren Z, Koopmans I, et al. Aberrantly expressed LGR4 empowers Wnt signaling in multiple myeloma by hijacking osteoblast-derived R-spondins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(2):376-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.van Andel H, Kocemba KA, Spaargaren M, Pals ST. Aberrant Wnt signaling in multiple myeloma: molecular mechanisms and targeting options. Leukemia. 2019;33(5):1063-1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Seidel C, Børset M, Hjertner O, et al. High levels of soluble syndecan-1 in myeloma-derived bone marrow: modulation of hepatocyte growth factor activity. Blood. 2000;96(9):3139-3146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang Y, Yaccoby S, Liu W, et al. Soluble syndecan-1 promotes growth of myeloma tumors in vivo. Blood. 2002;100(2):610-617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jung O, Beauvais DM, Adams KM, Rapraeger AC. VLA-4 phosphorylation during tumor and immune cell migration relies on its coupling to VEGFR2 and CXCR4 by syndecan-1. J Cell Sci. 2019;132(20):jcs232645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Purushothaman A, Uyama T, Kobayashi F, et al. Heparanase-enhanced shedding of syndecan-1 by myeloma cells promotes endothelial invasion and angiogenesis. Blood. 2010;115(12):2449-2457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ramani VC, Purushothaman A, Stewart MD, et al. The heparanase/syndecan-1 axis in cancer: mechanisms and therapies. FEBS J. 2013;280(10):2294-2306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jung O, Trapp-Stamborski V, Purushothaman A, et al. Heparanase-induced shedding of syndecan-1/CD138 in myeloma and endothelial cells activates VEGFR2 and an invasive phenotype: prevention by novel synstatins. Oncogenesis. 2016;5(2):e202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Terpos E, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Gavriatopoulou M, Dimopoulos MA. Pathogenesis of bone disease in multiple myeloma: from bench to bedside. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Standal T, Seidel C, Hjertner Ø, et al. Osteoprotegerin is bound, internalized, and degraded by multiple myeloma cells. Blood. 2002;100(8):3002-3007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ramani VC, Yang Y, Ren Y, Nan L, Sanderson RD. Heparanase plays a dual role in driving hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) signaling by enhancing HGF expression and activity. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(8):6490-6499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rangarajan S, Richter JR, Richter RP, et al. Heparanase-enhanced shedding of syndecan-1 and its role in driving disease pathogenesis and progression. J Histochem Cytochem. 2020;68(12):823-840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Netelenbos T, van den Born J, Kessler FL, et al. Proteoglycans on bone marrow endothelial cells bind and present SDF-1 towards hematopoietic progenitor cells. Leukemia. 2003;17(1):175-184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mansouri R, Jouan Y, Hay E, et al. Osteoblastic heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans control bone remodeling by regulating Wnt signaling and the crosstalk between bone surface and marrow cells [published correction appears in Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:788]. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(6):e2902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Papy-Garcia D, Albanese P. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans as key regulators of the mesenchymal niche of hematopoietic stem cells. Glycoconj J. 2017;34(3):377-391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Netelenbos T, van den Born J, Kessler FL, Zweegman S, Huijgens PC, Drager AM. In vitro model for hematopoietic progenitor cell homing reveals endothelial heparan sulfate proteoglycans as direct adhesive ligands. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;74(6):1035-1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tokoyoda K, Egawa T, Sugiyama T, Choi BI, Nagasawa T. Cellular niches controlling B lymphocyte behavior within bone marrow during development. Immunity. 2004;20(6):707-718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Morris AJ, Turnbull JE, Riley GP, Gordon MY, Gallagher JT. Production of heparan sulphate proteoglycans by human bone marrow stromal cells. J Cell Sci. 1991;99(Pt 1):149-156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Drzeniek Z, Siebertz B, Stöcker G, et al. Proteoglycan synthesis in haematopoietic cells: isolation and characterization of heparan sulphate proteoglycans expressed by the bone-marrow stromal cell line MS-5. Biochem J. 1997;327(Pt 2):473-480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ren Z, Lantermans H, Kuil A, et al. The CXCL12gamma chemokine immobilized by heparan sulfate on stromal niche cells controls adhesion and mediates drug resistance in multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Laguri C, Sadir R, Rueda P, et al. The novel CXCL12gamma isoform encodes an unstructured cationic domain which regulates bioactivity and interaction with both glycosaminoglycans and CXCR4. PLoS One. 2007;2(10):e1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rueda P, Balabanian K, Lagane B, et al. The CXCL12gamma chemokine displays unprecedented structural and functional properties that make it a paradigm of chemoattractant proteins. PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ikeda H, Hideshima T, Fulciniti M, et al. The monoclonal antibody nBT062 conjugated to cytotoxic Maytansinoids has selective cytotoxicity against CD138-positive multiple myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):4028-4037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schönfeld K, Zuber C, Pinkas J, Häder T, Bernöster K, Uherek C. Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) combination treatment in multiple myeloma: pre-clinical studies. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jagannath S, Heffner LT Jr., Ailawadhi S, et al. Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) monotherapy in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19(6):372-380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sun C, Mahendravada A, Ballard B, et al. Safety and efficacy of targeting CD138 with a chimeric antigen receptor for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2019;10(24):2369-2383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lanzi C, Zaffaroni N, Cassinelli G. Targeting heparan sulfate proteoglycans and their modifying enzymes to enhance anticancer chemotherapy efficacy and overcome drug resistance. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24(26):2860-2886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mohamed S, Coombe DR. Heparin mimetics: their therapeutic potential. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2017;10(4):78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ritchie JP, Ramani VC, Ren Y, et al. SST0001, a chemically modified heparin, inhibits myeloma growth and angiogenesis via disruption of the heparanase/syndecan-1 axis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(6):1382-1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ramani VC, Zhan F, He J, et al. Targeting heparanase overcomes chemoresistance and diminishes relapse in myeloma. Oncotarget. 2016;7(2):1598-1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hao M, Franqui-Machin R, Xu H, et al. NEK2 induces osteoclast differentiation and bone destruction via heparanase in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2017;31(7):1648-1650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tripathi K, Ramani VC, Bandari SK, et al. Heparanase promotes myeloma stemness and in vivo tumorigenesis. Matrix Biol. 2020;88:53-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Galli M, Chatterjee M, Grasso M, et al. Phase I study of the heparanase inhibitor roneparstat: an innovative approach for ultiple myeloma therapy. Haematologica. 2018;103(10):e469-e472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Habuchi H, Habuchi O, Kimata K. Sulfation pattern in glycosaminoglycan: does it have a code? Glycoconj J. 2004;21(1-2):47-52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zheng X, Gai X, Han S, et al. The human sulfatase 2 inhibitor 2,4-disulfonylphenyl-tert-butylnitrone (OKN-007) has an antitumor effect in hepatocellular carcinoma mediated via suppression of TGFB1/SMAD2 and Hedgehog/GLI1 signaling. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2013;52(3):225-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.de Souza PC, Balasubramanian K, Njoku C, et al. OKN-007 decreases tumor necrosis and tumor cell proliferation and increases apoptosis in a preclinical F98 rat glioma model. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(6):1582-1591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Coutinho de Souza P, Mallory S, Smith N, et al. Inhibition of pediatric glioblastoma tumor growth by the anti-cancer agent OKN-007 in orthotopic mouse xenografts. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Towner RA, Smith N, Saunders D, et al. OKN-007 increases temozolomide (TMZ) sensitivity and suppresses TMZ-resistant glioblastoma (GBM) tumor growth. Transl Oncol. 2019;12(2):320-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.