Abstract
Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a genetic disease leading to abnormalities in mechanical properties of different tissues. Here we quantify corneal biomechanical properties in an adult classic EDS mouse model using two different measurement approaches suited for murine corneal mechanical characterization and relate differences to stromal structure using Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) microscopy. Quasi-static Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) was conducted non-invasively during ambient pressure modulation by − 3 mmHg. 2D-extensometry measurements was conducted invasively consisting of a pre-conditioning cycle, a stress-relaxation test and a rupture test. In a total of 28 eyes from a Col5a1+/− mouse model and wild-type C57BL/6 littermates (wt), Col5a1+/− corneas were thinner when compared to wt, (125 ± 11 vs 148 ± 10 μm, respectively, p < 0.001). Short-term elastic modulus was significantly increased in OCE (506 ± 88 vs 430 ± 103 kPa, p = 0.023), and the same trend was observed in 2D-extensometry (30.7 ± 12.1 kPa vs 21.5 ± 5.7, p = 0.057). In contrast, in stress relaxation tests, Col5a1+/− corneas experienced a stronger relaxation (55% vs 50%, p = 0.01). SHG microscopy showed differences in forward and backward scattered signal indicating abnormal collagen fibrils in Col5a1+/− corneas. We propose that disturbed collagen fibril structure in Col5a1+/− corneas affects the viscoelastic properties. Results presented here support clinical findings, in which thin corneas with global ultrastructural alterations maintain a normal corneal shape.
Subject terms: Experimental models of disease, Pathogenesis, Biomedical engineering
Introduction
Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disease primarily affecting skin and joints, and generally characterized by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility and tissue fragility. Corneal thinning is a common finding in classic type EDS1,2, along with a steep cornea, but not a higher incidence of keratoconus3. On a molecular level, classic type EDS results from a mutation in COL5A1 and COL5A2.
Collagen V is present in the corneal stroma and makes approximately 10 to 20% of its collagen content, see review4. Collagen V is responsible for the formation of heterotypic fibrils together with collagen I5,6. The high content of collagen V in the cornea accounts for the unique small diameter of corneal fibrils6,7. A Col5a1+/− mouse model of classic EDS, with a 49% reduced content of collagen V, was found to have a 26% thinner cornea and abnormalities in collagen fibrils morphology2.
Corneal biomechanics in patients with classic EDS is of translational relevance because of this apparent contradiction between significant corneal thinning and the normal incidence of corneal ectasia.
Here, we quantify, for the first time to our knowledge, the biomechanical properties of the cornea in a mouse model for classic type EDS, and compare two distinct measurement approaches.
Results
Optical coherence elastography (OCE)
Optical coherence tomography was used for non-invasive structural and strain imaging. Figure 1 shows representative images in Col5a1+/− and wt corneas. It is clearly visible that Col5a1+/− corneas were thinner (125 ± 11 vs 148 ± 10 μm, factor 1.2) than wt corneas, with a significance of p < 0.001. Corneal strain images were relatively noisy, therefore for subsequent strain interpretation the mean value within a 21 × 21 pixels (68 × 63 μm) central area was computed. Figure 2A presents the corresponding mean axial strain values. No significant difference was found in axial strain (− 4.84 ± 1.99 vs − 4.93 ± 1.92‰, p = 0.799). After accounting for thickness (Fig. 2B), however, the E-modulus was significantly (p = 0.023) higher in the Col5a1+/− corneas (506 ± 88 vs 430 ± 103 kPa, factor 1.2) indicating higher mechanical stiffness, see Fig. 2C.
2D extensometry
Destructive extensometry is a standard technique for mechanical characterization. Stress-relaxation measurements could be interpreted in 12 out of 14 wt corneas and 9 out of 14 Col5a1+/− corneas, and stress–strain measurements could be interpreted in 8 and 11 Col5a1+/− and wt corneas, respectively, because of premature rupture of the sample during testing. Hence, Col5a1+/− had an increased susceptibility to rupture by approx. 25–30%. This percentage represents the ratio of eyes that ruptured prematurely in extensometry tests versus eyes that could be completely tested. It should be noted that on average corneas ruptured at a load of 0.87 ± 24 N, with Col5a1+/− showing a trend towards a slightly higher breaking load (p = 0.052). Figure 3A,B present results from the stress-relaxation analysis. Col5a1+/−corneas did present a significantly (p = 0.010) higher decrease in stress after 100 s of relaxation than wt corneas (55% vs 50%) indicating a stronger relaxation and thus more viscosity, i.e. less temporal stability. When fitting a 3-terms Prony series to the two relaxation curves, the following constants are obtained for wt corneas: E∞ = 1.18 MPa, E1 = 0.43 MPa, E2 = 0.51 MPa, E3 = 0.88 MPa, τ1 = 3.1 s, τ2 = 51 s, τ3 = 124 s. And for Col5a1+/− corneas: E∞ = 1.14 MPa, E1 = 0.50 MPa, E2 = 0.62 MPa, E3 = 1.29 MPa, τ1 = 3.1 s, τ2 = 56 s, τ3 = 57 s. Figure 3C,D present results from the stress–strain analysis computed from the initial region of the rupture test. Interestingly, and similar to OCE measurements, Col5a1+/−corneas showed a trend towards a steeper stress–strain curve and thus higher E-modulus than wt corneas (30.7 ± 12.1 kPa vs 21.5 ± 5.7), even though statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.057).
Second harmonic generation imaging
Second harmonic generation imaging was performed to evalute stromal hierarchical organization in a COL5A1 deficient matrix. To assess the influence of COL5A1 on fibrillar collagen and hierarchical organization without tissue manipulation or chemical fixation, we studied adult Col5a1+/− stromas and compared them to WT stromas. En face imaging of the stroma and cross sections of adult corneas from both groups were imaged immediately after enucleation. Increased forward scattered and backward scattered signaling suggests fibril disorganization, increased fibril density and abnormalities in the hierarchical organization in Col5a1+/− corneas compared to WT, see Figs. 4 and 5. These findings suggest that a matrix deficient in COL5A1 presents with changes in fibril structure and stromal hierarchical organization.
Discussion
Our analyses confirm that Col5a1+/− corneas represent a valid model for classic type EDS for the following reasons: first, an increased susceptibility to corneal rupture, about 25–30%, was observed. This is particularly interesting, as the remaining Col5a1+/− showed the trend to a higher load necessary for tissue break and thus premature rupture cannot be attributed to the fact that corneal tissue was thinner in those corneas. Spontaneous tissue rupture is more typical for type VI EDS. In a clinical group of 11 patients8, corneal rupture occurred spontaneously or after minimal trauma in approximately 35%. This condition is also known as ‘oculus fragilis’9. Interestingly, classic type EDS has also been associated with spontaneous arterial rupture10. We may speculate that a mutation in collagen V leads to a similar structural defect created by a deficiency in lysyl hydroxylase, except that rupture occurs at higher loads and thus is less frequent. Mechanically, spontaneous rupture might be attributed to a stiffer short-term behavior (increased E-modulus, Figs. 2C, 3D), but potentially more brittle corneal tissue.
Second, a thinner cornea in Col5a1+/− eyes of approximately 20% was found in the current study, which is in line with previous literature reporting 26% thickness reduction in the same mouse model2. Compared to a clinical group of EDS patients, this feature appears to manifest in humans less pronouncedly. Here, a mean reduction of 41 μm was reported3, which corresponds to a thickness reduction by approximately 8% assuming a normal corneal thickness of 546 μm11. Corneal thinning in Col5a1+/− corneas might be attributed to a stronger stress relaxation under the same load as applied in this study (Fig. 3B), or correspondingly under normal IOP in patients.
While this combination—i.e. increased relaxation in combination with increased brittleness—may appear contradictory, it could be explained by a difference in time-scale: Stress relaxation was conducted during 120 s, while the rupture test took only 12 s (for the strain region analyzed). These measurement settings had been previously applied for the characterization of mouse corneas after UV riboflavin cross-linking12,13 and did allow a robust fit to Eq. (7) and to find meaningful differences. Similarly, the OCE measurement was conducted within < 20 s. This means time scales vary by a factor of 5 to 10. It is normal for viscoelastic material to behave stiffer in shorter time intervals14. In the context of this study, we may conclude that the viscoelastic time constants in Col5a1+/− corneas are prolonged in short-term and reduced in long-term deformation. In other words, a sudden impact is less damped and thus may lead to rupture. In contrast, on long term steady loads (such as the IOP) more relaxation and thus thinner corneas can be expected. When examining the Prony series fit, the largest difference is observed in the third term (G3, τ3), which indeed reflects a reduction of the long-term time constant in Col5a1+/− corneas. From a biological point of view, thinner corneas could be a consequence of a lower number of collagen fibrils due to the reduced collagen V content2.
Overall, the results of the two distinct measurement approaches agree in that corneal E-modulus is increased in Col5a1+/− corneas at a measurement time of 10–20 s. We may expect that for even shorter test durations the difference in E-modulus between the two groups would be even higher.
Our SHG microscopy findings demonstrate the importance of collagen V in regulating the stromal hierarchical organization of the cornea. Segev et al.2 showed that collagen fibril diameters were increased, but fibril density was decreased in the Col5a1+/− corneas by using quantification of fibrils size and spacing using transmission electron microscopy. These alterations in collagen fibril morphology and structure could explain the differences in forward scattered and backward scattered signaling noted in the Col5a1+/− corneas. Increased forward scattered and backward scattered signals were present in Col5a1+/− corneas. We performed signal intensity measurements (or quantification) of the SHG signal obtained from the WT versus Col5a1+/− mice which showed higher signaling in the Col5a1+/− mice. However, intensity measruments are hard to interpret and we are currently working on experiments to evaluate if increased collagen content correlates with increased SHG forward scattered and backward scattered signaling.
It is possible that this alteration in fibril morphology and hierarchical organization come with changes in tissue mechanics. Thicker fibrils with increased interfibrillar spacing could hypothetically account for the increased relaxation and brittleness noted in this mouse model.
Besides EDS, the family of ectatic corneal diseases (keratoconus, keratoglobus, pellucid marginal degeneration) shows corneal thinning and altered corneal biomechanics: however, although associations have been described between EDS and keratoglobus15, larger series have failed to demonstrate an association with keratoconus. McDermott et al. analyzed 72 eyes of 36 patients with genetically-confirmed EDS and found no signs of keratoconus16. This might be associated to the fact that Col5a1+/ − corneas are globally and homogenously deficient in collagen V. In addition, unlike keratoconus corneas, which exhibit localized biomechanical weakening and corneal topographic changes, the higher elastic modulus found here in Col5a1+/− corneas support the counterintuitive findings in which collagen V-deficient corneas are able to maintain their physiological shape. In other words, our findings may explain why collagen-deficient thin and abnormal corneas do not develop ectasia.
In OCE measurements, corneal strain values were not different between Col5a1+/− and wt, which is not surprising as axial strain alone does not permit a biomechanical interpretation, except the same stress configuration can be ensured. However, this was not the case given that corneas in the Col5a1+/− group were 20% thinner than in the wt group. As a consequence, the resulting stress from the 3-mmHg pressure modulation was higher in Col5a1+/− corneas. It might be considered a limitation of this study, that the stress level had not been adjusted according to the expected thickness difference. However, as the natural loading condition of the cornea is the intraocular pressure, which is supposedly similar in EDS patients and healthy persons, the application of the same pressure (or force) loading as done in the current study, permits a more physiologically relevant interpretation of the results.
In conclusion, a reduced expression of Col5a1+/− in the cornea seems to predominantly affect the viscoelastic properties of the tissue. The results presented here support and rationalize the notion than thin corneas with altered extracellular matrix composition maintain a normal corneal shape during homeostasis. Further studies are needed to evaluate if long-term stress on an abnormal matrix worsen alterations in corneal thickness and facilitate tissue protrusion.
Methods
Animals
A Col5a1-haploinsufficient mouse model of classic EDS was used in this study17. A total of 14 mice heterozygous for collagen V (Col5a1+/−) and 14 mice of their wild-type littermates (wt) were used for biomechanical analyses. All experiments were conducted ex vivo in enucleated eyes. Each eye underwent first a non-invasive measurement with optical coherence elastography in the intact eye globe, and subsequently destructive 2D extensometry testing in the dissected corneal button. The two techniques applied for mechanical characterization rely on different assumptions and differ in the sensitivity to record deformation and thus assess different locations of the stress–strain curve. For this reason, the combined analysis permits a comprehensive evaluation of tissue properties and allows the comparison of invasive and non-invasive mechanical characterization techniques. OCT measurements are most sensitive to (small) axial displacements and thus strain values were only accessible in vertical direction, i.e. assessing compression. In contrast, extensometry test are most sensitive to (larger) lateral elongation of the corneal tissue, i.e. assessing stretching. Twelve additional eyes were included for second harmonic generation imaging. All animals used were male adults around 60 days old. Mice were housed and treated in accordance with NIH's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experiments were conducted in agreement with the ARVO Statement Regarding the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the University of South Florida.
Optical coherence elastography (OCE)
Previously, we developed a non-invasive imaging approach to assess corneal stiffness by the use of ambient pressure modulation. This approach was demonstrated to retrieve different irradiation patterns used for CXL treatment in rat eyes18. In here, we applied the same technique18. Briefly, OCE measurements were conducted with a custom-built spectral domain OCT system (λ = 878 nm, Δλ = 62.5 nm) while the entire eyeball was subjected to ambient pressure modulation. The structural imaging resolution of the spectral domain OCT system was ~ 3.96 μm axially (in tissue) and 12.5 μm laterally; the strain imaging resolution 26 μm axially and 112 μm laterally. Briefly, the eye was placed within a sealed pressure chamber that was connected to a 1 ml syringe and a U-shaped water column. A reference B-scan consisting of 1000 A-scans recorded at a speed of 10 kHz was captured at normal atmospheric pressure (1013 hPa). Subsequently, the pressure within the chamber was reduced by 3 mmHg and a second, deformed B-scan was recorded with the same settings. Phase difference analysis was performed on the two B-scans and converted into induced axial strain Δεoct. For this purpose, the complex cross-correlation of the raw OCT signal of the reference and deformed B-scan was computed by
1 |
where Bref and Bdef respectively represent the reference and deformed cross-sectional B-scan with z indicating depth and x indicating lateral distance. The axial strain induced between two subsequent B-scans can than be computed from the phase difference according to
2 |
where asu = 4.48 μm represents the axial sampling unit and n = 1.375 the refractive index. Strain values were averaged across the whole thickness and central zone of 0.5 mm diameter. Central corneal thickness (cct) was extracted from the OCT scan corneal stress σoct resulting from the pressure modulation Δp was determined with Laplace’s equation19:
3 |
where R = 1.5 mm is the radius of the cornea. Finally, the E-modulus Eoct was estimated from
4 |
2D extensometry
Our group has recently established a novel method to perform 2D stress–strain extensometry measurements in murine corneas. Using this technique, we could previously demonstrate that corneal cross-linking (CXL) significantly increases corneal stiffness in mice20. Extensometry measurements were conducted in corneas circumferentially excised near the limbus. Corneal buttons were fixed within a 2D holder with a central opening of 1.6 mm diameter, as described earlier20. A drop of PBS was applied on top and bottom of the opening to prevent dehydration during testing. A hemispherical indenter (1 mm diameter) was then used to apply the test force homogenously over the posterior corneal surface, similar to the IOP. The biomechanical analysis was conducted in three steps: (1) pre-conditioning cycle with three repetitions of stress–strain testing with a load between 0.04 and 0.4 N; (2) stress-relaxation testing during 120 s during the application of an initial load of 0.4 N; and (3) rupture test with an increasing load from 0.4 to 4.0 N. For each step, the tensile corneal stress (i.e. similar to hoop stress) induced by the test load F was determined from a geometrical estimation based on thin shell theory that previously20 has been described in more detail:
5 |
where cct is the central corneal thickness determined from OCT measurements. The corresponding 2-dimensional tensile strain was computed from the axial travel distance Δl of the indenter following the approach outlined by Hammer et al.20:
6 |
This assumption holds true, as long as the corneal sample is mounted flat and the induced deformation is in the order of the anterior chamber depth in the mouse eye, which was the case even in rupture tests (25% of corneal tensile strain correspond to an axial travel distance ~ 100 μm). Finally, the E-modulus Eext was determined from the mean slope in the stress–strain diagram between 10 and 15% of strain. To characterize viscoelastic material properties, a 3-term Prony series was used to describe the stress relaxation curves:
7 |
where represents the long-term E-modulus (at full relaxation), Ei the short-term E-moduli, the corresponding relaxation time constants and N = 3 the number of Prony terms. During stress relaxation strain is kept constant (), such that after applying the relation , Eq. (7) can be expressed in terms of stress. In order to retrieve , the experimentally measured force F was converted to stress according to Eq. (5) and then fitted to Eq. (7) by means of least-squares minimization.
Second harmonic generation microscopy of corneal stroma
Enucleated eyes were immediately placed in Optisol media on a custom-made glass chamber and imaged (within 5 min) without any tissue manipulation or additional dissection for cross-section images of the cornea. Some corneas were dissected from the globe and placed as a flat mount for en face imaging. Corneas dissected from the globe were immersed in calcein red-orage (ThermoFischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted in optisol medium to allow penetration of the dye to the stroma for 5 min and allow visualization of keratocytes embedded within the stroma. Corneas were imaged using an Olympus MPE-RS microscope using a 25× (0.95 NA) water-immersion objective (Olympus). Two-photon SHG signals were generated using a mode-locked titanium:sapphire laser at 960 nm. The SHG forward-scattered signals passing through the corneal sections were collected using a 0.8 NA condenser lens with a narrow band-pass filter (465–485 nm). Backward-scattered SHG signals were detected with a band pass filter (460–500 nm). All samples were scanned using a 2 μm z-axis step size from the back to the front of the section.
Statistical analysis
Data distribution was tested for normality with the Shapiro–Wilk test. If normally distributed, parameters were compared with a two-tailed independent student’s t-test, otherwise with the independent samples Mann–Whitney U test. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Acknowledgements
This study received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione PZ00P2_174113 to SK), from the Velux Foundation, Switzerland (ET), from the Light for Sight Foundation (HA, FH), and NIH/NEI grant EY029395 to EME.
Author contributions
S.K., E.E., F.H. designed the study. S.K., E.T., H.A., E.E. collected the data. S.K. analyzed the data. S.K. drafted the manuscript. All co-authors revised the manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Sabine Kling and Emilio A. Torres-Netto.
References
- 1.Pesudovs K. Orbscan mapping in Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2004;30:1795–1798. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Segev F, et al. Structural abnormalities of the cornea and lid resulting from collagen V mutations. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47:565–573. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Villani E, et al. The cornea in classic type Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: Macro-and microstructural changes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013;54:8062–8068. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Espana, E. M. & Birk, D. E. Composition, structure and function of the corneal stroma. Exp. Eye Res. 108137 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Birk DE, Fitch JM, Babiarz JP, Linsenmayer TF. Collagen type I and type V are present in the same fibril in the avian corneal stroma. J. Cell Biol. 1988;106:999–1008. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.3.999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Birk D, Fitch J, Linsenmayer T. Organization of collagen types I and V in the embryonic chicken cornea. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1986;27:1470–1477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Birk DE, Fitch J, Babiarz J, Doane K, Linsenmayer T. Collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: Interaction of types I and V collagen regulates fibril diameter. J. Cell Sci. 1990;95:649–657. doi: 10.1242/jcs.95.4.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cameron JA. Corneal abnormalities in Ehlers–Danlos syndrome type VI. Cornea. 1993;12:54–59. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199301000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Macsai MS, Lemley HL, Schwartz T. Management of oculus fragilis in Ehlers–Danlos type VI. Cornea. 2000;19:104–107. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200001000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Borck G, Beighton P, Wilhelm C, Kohlhase J, Kubisch C. Arterial rupture in classic Ehlers–Danlos syndrome with COL5A1 mutation. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2010;152:2090–2093. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Harper C, et al. Diurnal variations in human corneal thickness. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1996;80:1068–1072. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.12.1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kling S, et al. Increased biomechanical efficacy of corneal cross-linking in thin corneas due to higher oxygen availability. J. Refract. Surg. 2015;31:840–846. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151111-08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tabibian D, Kling S, Hammer A, Richoz O, Hafezi F. Repeated cross-linking after a short time does not provide any additional biomechanical stiffness in the mouse cornea in vivo. J. Refract. Surg. 2017;33:56–60. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20161006-02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vincent, J. Chapter One. Basic elasticity and viscoelasticity. In Structural biomaterials 1–28 (Princeton University Press, 2012).
- 15.Perez-Roustit S, et al. Manifestations ophtalmologiques des syndromes d’Ehlers–Danlos: À propos d’une cohorte de 21 patients. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 2019;42:722–729. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McDermott ML, et al. Corneal topography in Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 1998;24:1212–1215. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wenstrup RJ, et al. Murine model of the Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: col5a1 haploinsufficiency disrupts collagen fibril assembly at multiple stages. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:12888–12895. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511528200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kling S. Optical coherence elastography by ambient pressure modulation for high-resolution strain mapping applied to patterned cross-linking. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2020;17:20190786. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chung CW, Girard MJ, Jan N-J, Sigal IA. Use and misuse of Laplace’s law in ophthalmology. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:236–245. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hammer A, et al. Establishing corneal cross-linking with riboflavin and UV-A in the mouse cornea in vivo: Biomechanical analysis. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015;56:6581–6590. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.