ABSTRACT
In the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), more severe outcomes are reported in males than in females, including hospitalizations and deaths. Animal models can provide an opportunity to mechanistically interrogate causes of sex differences in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Adult male and female golden Syrian hamsters (8 to 10 weeks of age) were inoculated intranasally with 105 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) of SARS-CoV-2/USA-WA1/2020 and euthanized at several time points during the acute (i.e., virus actively replicating) and recovery (i.e., after the infectious virus has been cleared) phases of infection. There was no mortality, but infected male hamsters experienced greater morbidity, losing a greater percentage of body mass, developed more extensive pneumonia as noted on chest computed tomography, and recovered more slowly than females. Treatment of male hamsters with estradiol did not alter pulmonary damage. Virus titers in respiratory tissues, including nasal turbinates, trachea, and lungs, and pulmonary cytokine concentrations, including interferon-β (IFN-β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), were comparable between the sexes. However, during the recovery phase of infection, females mounted 2-fold greater IgM, IgG, and IgA responses against the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein (S-RBD) in both plasma and respiratory tissues. Female hamsters also had significantly greater IgG antibodies against whole-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and mutant S-RBDs as well as virus-neutralizing antibodies in plasma. The development of an animal model to study COVID-19 sex differences will allow for a greater mechanistic understanding of the SARS-CoV-2-associated sex differences seen in the human population.
KEYWORDS: animal model, COVID-19, sex differences, SARS-CoV-2 variants, receptor-binding domain
INTRODUCTION
At the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, early publications from Wuhan, China (1, 2), and European countries (3) began reporting male biases in hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and mortality rates. Ongoing real-time surveillance (4) and meta-analyses of over 3 million cases of COVID-19 (5) continue to show that while the incidence of COVID-19 cases is similar between the sexes, adult males are almost 3 times more likely to be admitted into ICUs and twice as likely to die as females. Differential exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is likely associated with behaviors, occupations, comorbidities, and societal and cultural norms (i.e., gender differences) that impact the probability of exposure, access to testing, utilization of health care, and risk of disease (6–8). This is distinct but also complementary to biological sex differences (i.e., sex chromosome complement, reproductive tissues, and sex steroid hormone concentrations) that can also impact susceptibility and outcomes from COVID-19 (9, 10). While exposure to SARS-CoV-2 may differ based on gender, the increased mortality rate among males in diverse countries and at diverse ages likely reflects biological sex. Studies have shown that in males, mutations in X-linked genes (e.g., TLR7) resulting in reduced interferon (IFN) signaling (11), elevated proinflammatory cytokine production (e.g., interleukin-6 [IL-6] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) (2, 12), reduced CD8+ T cell activity (e.g., IFN-γ) (13), and greater antibody responses (i.e., anti-SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific IgM, IgG, and IgA and neutralizing antibodies) (14) are associated with more severe COVID-19 outcomes than in females. Because COVID-19 outcomes can be impacted by both gender and biological sex, consideration of the intersection of these contributors is necessary in human studies (15).
Animal models can mechanistically explore sex differences in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 independent of confounding gender-associated factors that impact exposure, testing, and use of health care globally. Transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (K18-hACE2) are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, and in this model, males experience greater morbidity than females, despite having similar viral loads in respiratory tissues (e.g., nasal turbinates, trachea, and lungs) (16, 17). Transcriptional analyses of lung tissue revealed that inflammatory cytokine and chemokine gene expression is greater in males than in females early during infection, and these transcriptional patterns show a stronger correlation with disease outcomes among males than females (16, 17). In addition to utilizing hACE2 mice, mouse-adapted strains of SARS-CoV-2 have been developed and can productively infect wild-type mice but have not yet been used to evaluate sex-specific differences in the pathogenesis of disease (18–20).
Golden Syrian hamsters are also being used as an animal model of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis because they are susceptible to human strains of viruses, without the need for genetic modifications in either the host or virus. While studies have included males and females in analyses of age-associated differences in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 (21), few studies have specifically evaluated males versus females to better understand sex differences in disease. There are studies of golden Syrian hamsters that have included male and female hamsters, but they did not have sufficient numbers of animals to accurately compare the sexes (22). Sex differences are not reported in viral RNA, infectious virus, or cytokine mRNA expression at a single time point (i.e., 4 days postinfection) in the lungs of golden Syrian hamsters (23). There is a gap in the literature of studies designed to rigorously test the hypothesis that biological sex alters disease severity and immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
RESULTS
Males experience greater morbidity than females following SARS-CoV-2 infection, which cannot be reversed by estradiol treatment.
Intranasal inoculation of human clinical isolates of SARS-CoV-2 causes productive infection in golden Syrian hamsters (24–26). To test the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 infection results in sex differences in disease outcomes, adult male and female golden Syrian hamsters were infected with 105 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) of virus, and changes in body mass were monitored for 28 days postinoculation (dpi). Mortality was not observed in either sex, but infected hamsters progressively lost body mass during the first week before starting to recover (Fig. 1A). The peak body mass loss in female hamsters was observed at 6 dpi (−12.3 ± 1.8%), whereas peak body mass loss in male hamsters was observed at 7 dpi (−17.3 ± 1.9%). The percentage of body mass loss was significantly greater in male than in female hamsters at 8 to 10 dpi and throughout the recovery period (P < 0.05; Fig. 1A). Recovery to baseline body mass after SARS-CoV-2 infection occurred within 2 weeks for female hamsters and at 3 weeks for male hamsters (Fig. 1A).
To evaluate pulmonary disease in SARS-CoV-2-infected males and females, chest computed tomography (CT) was performed at the peak of lung disease (7 dpi). As previously reported by others (26), multiple and bilateral mixed ground-glass opacities (GGO) and consolidations were detected in both females and males (Fig. 1B; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). In order to reduce bias in the visual assessment, we developed an unbiased approach to quantify lung disease by chest CT. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn to capture total and diseased (pneumonic) lung volumes (Fig. 1C). As reported in COVID-19 patients who underwent CT (27, 28), there was significantly more disease in the lungs of male hamsters than in female hamsters (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1D). These results indicate that infected male hamsters developed more severe disease, including more extensive lung injury, than females.
Previous studies show that estrogens, including but not limited to estradiol (E2), are anti-inflammatory and can reduce pulmonary tissue damage following respiratory infections, including with influenza A viruses or Streptococcus pneumoniae (29–31). To test the hypothesis that E2 could dampen inflammation and pulmonary tissue damage to improve outcomes in male hamsters, males received either exogenous E2 capsules or placebo capsules prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Plasma concentrations of E2 were significantly elevated in E2-treated males compared with placebo-treated males (P < 0.05; Fig. 2A) and were well within the normal range of plasma concentrations of E2 in cyclic female hamsters (30 to 700 pg/ml) (32). Animals were followed for 7 dpi, and changes in body mass and chest CT score were quantified. There was no effect of E2 treatment on morbidity, as placebo- and E2-treated males had equivalent percentages of body mass loss (Fig. 2B). CT findings noted in E2-treated males were similar to those noted in placebo-treated males (Fig. S1), and chest CT scans revealed no difference in CT score between groups (Fig. 2C). At 7 dpi, the lung parenchyma contained consolidation areas consisting of scattered multinucleated syncytia, atypical hyperplastic proliferative type II pneumocytes, rich clusters of macrophages, and vasculitis (Fig. 2D). Moreover, histopathology demonstrated similar cell infiltration and pneumonic areas between groups. From these data, we conclude that the treatment of gonadally intact males with E2 did not improve morbidity or pulmonary outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
SARS-CoV-2 replication kinetics are similar between the sexes.
To test the hypothesis that male-biased disease outcomes were caused by increased virus load or faster replication kinetics, subsets of infected male and female hamsters were euthanized at 2, 4, or 7 dpi, and infectious virus titers were measured in the respiratory tissue homogenates. The peak infectious virus titers in the nasal turbinates (Fig. 3A), trachea (Fig. 3B), and lungs (Fig. 3C) were detected at 2 dpi, decreased at 4 dpi, and cleared at 7 dpi. There were no sex differences in either peak virus titers or clearance of SARS-CoV-2 from any of the respiratory tissues tested (Fig. 3A to C). Although the infectious virus was cleared from the respiratory tract of most of the hamsters by 7 dpi (Fig. 3A to C), viral RNA was still detectable in the lungs at 14 dpi in all of the SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters, with no differences between the sexes (Fig. 3D). These data illustrate that sex differences in the disease phenotype are not due to differences in infectious virus loads or persistence of viral RNA.
Cytokine concentrations in the lungs are comparable between the sexes.
To test whether local or systemic cytokine activity differed between the sexes, cytokine mRNA expression was measured in lung tissue, and protein concentrations of cytokines were measured in lung and spleen homogenates at 2, 4, or 7 dpi. Transcriptionally, although males and females had similar pulmonary expression of Il1b, Il6, Ifna, Ifnb, and Ifng, males had greater expression of Tnfa than females (P < 0.05; Fig. 4A to F), which was also associated with greater viral titers at 2 dpi in both sexes (P < 0.05; Fig. 4G). Sex differences were not observed in the concentrations of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, or IL-10 in either lung (Fig. 4H to M) or spleen (Table S1) homogenates; concentrations of TNF-α in the lungs, however, were positively associated with virus titers at 2 dpi (P < 0.05; Fig. 4N), and concentrations of IFN-β were negatively associated with virus titers at 4 dpi (R = −0.85, P < 0.05; data not shown) in both sexes. When cytokine data were aggregated for male and female hamsters, there was no consistent pattern of mRNA expression in the lungs (Fig. S2A to F). Lung concentrations of IL-1β (Fig. S2G), TNF-α (Fig. S2H), IFN-α (Fig. S2J), and IFN-β (Fig. S2K), but not IL-6 (Fig. S2I), IFN-γ (Fig. S2L), or IL-10 (Table S1), were greater in samples from infected hamsters than in sex-matched mock-infected hamsters (P < 0.05 in each case). There was no effect of infection on the concentration of cytokines in the spleen (Table S1). Taken together, these data provide no evidence that male-biased disease outcomes are caused by differential production of cytokines in response to SARS-CoV-2 during acute infection.
Female hamsters develop greater antibody responses than males during SARS-CoV-2 infection.
To evaluate whether females developed greater antiviral antibody responses than males, as is observed in response to influenza A viruses (33), we measured virus-specific immunoglobulins as well as neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers in plasma and respiratory samples collected throughout the course of infection. To begin our evaluation, we inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virions to analyze plasma IgG that recognize diverse virus antigens. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers were detected within a week postinfection, with females developing greater antibody titers than males at 21 and 28 dpi (P < 0.05; Fig. 5A). Using live SARS-CoV-2, we measured nAb titers in plasma, which were detectable 7 to 28 dpi, with females having or trending toward significantly greater titers than males at 14 to 28 dpi (P < 0.05; Fig. 5B).
SARS-CoV-2 infection induces robust antibody responses against the spike protein or receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein (S-RBD) in humans and in animal models (14, 34, 35). S-RBD-specific IgM (Fig. 5C), IgA (Fig. 5D), and IgG (Fig. 5E) antibodies were detected in plasma within a week postinfection. In plasma, anti-S-RBD IgM antibody titers were significantly greater in females than in males at 21 dpi (P < 0.05; Fig. 5C), and anti-S-RBD IgA and IgG antibody titers were significantly greater in females than in males at 21 and 28 dpi (P < 0.05; Fig. 5D and E). Variants of SARS-CoV-2 due to mutations in the RBD of the spike protein, including the N501Y variant, were first reported in the United Kingdom and subsequently circulated worldwide (36). The mink variant (Y453F), European variant (N439K), and South African/Brazilian variants (E484K) have raised concerns over increased transmissibility and escape from host immune responses (37, 38). Considering the emergence of novel variants, we tested the hypothesis that females would have greater cross-reactive antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants. Similar to wild-type S-RDB (Fig. 5E), IgG antibody titers against the S-RBD mutants N501Y, Y453F, N439K, and E484K were significantly greater in female hamsters than in male hamsters (P of <0.05 in each case; Fig. 5F). Overall, IgG responses to the E484K variant, but not the N501Y variant, were significantly lower in both sexes than responses to the wild-type S-RBD (P of <0.05 for main effect of variant; Fig. 5F).
Local antibody responses at the site of infection are critical for SARS-CoV-2 control and recovery (39, 40). Anti-S-RBD IgM titers were greatest in the lungs at 7 dpi and were significantly greater in female hamsters than in male hamsters (P < 0.05; Fig. 6A). A cornerstone of mucosal humoral immunity is IgA, and anti-S-RBD IgA titers peaked at 7 dpi, with a trend for higher titers in females than in males (P = 0.07; Fig. 6B). By 28 dpi, females still had detectable anti-S-RBD IgA titers in their lungs, whereas males did not (P < 0.05; Fig. 6B). Anti-S-RBD IgG titers in the lungs were elevated 7 to 28 dpi, with a higher trend observed at 28 dpi in females than in males (P = 0.09; Fig. 6C). In the trachea, but not in nasal turbinate or lung homogenates, females had significantly greater anti-S-RBD IgG titers than males (P < 0.05; Fig. 6D). In summary, these data demonstrate that female hamsters develop greater systemic and local antiviral antibody responses than male hamsters during SARS-CoV-2 infection.
DISCUSSION
Sex differences in COVID-19 outcomes are well documented (9, 13). There is a critical need to develop accurate animal models that reflect the male bias in disease outcomes to better understand the underlying mechanisms. We show that male hamsters suffer more systemic (body mass loss) and local (pulmonary pathology) symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection than females. We tested several potential mechanisms that could mediate male-biased outcomes from infection, including (i) lack of estrogenic protection, (ii) greater virus replication, (iii) exacerbated cytokine responses, and (iv) reduced humoral immunity. Our data reveal that females produce greater antibody responses, both locally in the respiratory tract as well as systemically in plasma, but whether this causes female hamsters to suffer less severe outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection remains to be determined.
Clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hamsters are typically mild, with reduced body mass after infection consistently observed (21, 24–26). Previous studies have shown that hamsters lose body mass after infection, reaching peak loss at 5 to 7 dpi followed by recovery (24–26). Body mass loss in hamsters, regardless of age, has been associated with the dose of virus inoculum, with higher dose resulting in greater body mass loss (26, 41). Body mass loss also is influenced by age; older hamsters (i.e., 7 to 9 months old) had greater body mass loss than younger animals (i.e., 4 to 6 weeks old) (21, 26). Sex is another factor impacting body mass loss in hamsters following SARS-CoV-2 infection. As reported in humans, older age and male sex are clinical variables associated with greater clinical manifestations of disease in hamsters.
A novel determinant of clinical disease that was utilized in the current study was unbiased, quantitative chest CT-imaging analysis. Previous reports describe chest CT findings in female SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters only and show lung abnormalities, including multilobular ground-glass opacities (GGO) and consolidation (26), as observed in patients with COVID-19 (42). In the current study, CT imaging revealed that multilobular GGO and consolidations were observed to a greater extent in male than in female SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters at 7 dpi. Whether the sexes differ in the recovery of pulmonary damage following infection requires greater consideration. There are a number of registered clinical trials of therapeutic E2 administration (NCT04359329 and NCT04539626) in COVID-19, which raised the question as to whether disease outcomes in male hamsters could be improved through administration of E2. In this study, pretreatment of male hamsters with E2 prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection did not reduce weight loss, observed histological damage to lung tissue, or the observed multilobular GGO and consolidations.
While male hamsters could not be protected with exogenous E2 treatment, there is still the possibility that testosterone in males is driving more severe disease. A small prospective cohort study in human COVID-19 patients showed that men with lower testosterone concentrations during hospitalization had greater disease severity and markers of inflammation (43). Because COVID-19 is more severe in older men than in younger men, it also could be that the observation of lower testosterone being associated with greater inflammation and more severe disease is confounded by the average age of the patients being greater than 65 years of age. In studies utilizing young adult mice, testosterone has been shown to be anti-inflammatory and is associated with reduced cytokine concentrations and frequencies of inflammatory monocytes and virus-specific CD8+ T cells in the lungs during influenza A virus infection (44, 45). Future studies must further explore the direct effects of testosterone on the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in golden Syrian hamsters.
SARS-CoV-2 replicates in the nasal turbinates, trachea, and lungs of infected golden Syrian hamsters (24, 25). Virus replication peaks in respiratory tissue within 2 to 4 dpi, with virus clearance typically occurring within 1 week (21, 24, 25). Viral RNA, however, is present in the lungs of infected hamsters beyond 7 dpi (21, 22, 25). We observed peak infectious virus load in nasal turbinates, trachea, and lungs at 2 dpi, with clearance by 7 dpi. After infectious virus had been cleared, viral RNA still remained detectable in the lungs up to 14 dpi. Previous studies have reported that while aged hamsters experience worse disease outcomes than young hamsters, virus titers in respiratory tissues are similar (21, 26). We further show that although young adult male hamsters experience worse disease outcomes than female hamsters, sex differences in virus titers in respiratory tissues are not observed.
During SARS-CoV-2 infection of hamsters, cytokine gene expression, including Tnfα, Ifnα, and Ifnγ in the nasal turbinates and lungs, is triggered at 2 dpi, peaks at 4 dpi, and returns to baseline by 7 dpi, but comparisons between males and females have not performed (24, 41, 46). Analyses of protein concentrations of cytokines in lung and spleen homogenates revealed no differences between males and females during the first week of infection. Although sex differences were not observed, concentrations of TNF-α and IFN-β were positively and negatively, respectively, associated with virus replication in lungs, regardless of sex. Our findings suggest that cytokine production, either locally in the lungs or systemically in the spleen, does not underlie sex differences in clinical manifestations of disease in hamsters and adds to the growing list of questions about the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in human populations. The possibility of differences in cellular infiltration into pulmonary tissue requires greater consideration, which will be feasible only when better reagents, including antibodies, become available for hamsters.
Studies have reported that both IgG and virus-neutralizing antibodies are detected in serum from SARS-CoV-2-infected golden Syrian hamsters as early as 7 dpi and persist through 43 dpi (24, 35, 47). In the present study, females developed greater IgG responses against both SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and variant S-RBD as well as antiviral nAb titers in both plasma and respiratory tissue homogenates than males. We also showed that mucosal IgA titers are greater in the lungs of female hamsters than in male hamsters and are detectable as early as 7 dpi. Passive transfer of convalescent-phase sera from infected to naive hamsters as well as reinfection of previously infected hamsters carrying high antibody titers have both been shown to provide protection by reducing virus titers in the respiratory tissues (24, 26). Likewise, hamster models of SARS-CoV-2 immunization have shown an inverse correlation between antibody responses and either virus titers in the respiratory tissues or body mass loss (48). These studies highlight the possible protective role of antibodies during SARS-CoV-2 infection, which may contribute to faster recovery in female hamsters than in male hamsters.
Golden Syrian hamsters have already been successfully used in SARS-CoV-2 transmission studies (24, 25, 49) to compare routes of SARS-CoV-2 infection (41, 50), to evaluate convalescent plasma and monoclonal antibody therapy (24, 26, 51–53), and to test therapeutics and vaccines (23, 48). This model provides a unique opportunity to understand the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 immunopathology not only systemically but also at the site of infection. Sex as a biological variable should be considered in all studies utilizing golden Syrian hamsters for prophylactic and therapeutic treatments against SARS-CoV-2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Viruses, cells, and viral proteins.
Vero-E6-TMPRSS2 cells were cultured in complete cell growth medium (CM) composed of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) antibiotics (54). The SARS-CoV-2 strain (SARS-CoV-2/USA-WA1/2020) was obtained from Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (NR number 52281; BEI Resources, VA, USA). SARS-CoV-2 stocks were generated by infecting Vero-E6-TMPRSS2 cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 TCID50s per cell, and the infected cell culture supernatant was collected at 72 h postinfection, clarified by centrifugation at 400 × g for 10 min and then stored at −70°C (54). SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike receptor-binding domain (S-RBD) protein used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was expressed and purified using methods described previously (14) or purchased from SinoBiologicals. To obtain whole-inactivated SARS-CoV-2, Vero-E6-TMPRSS2 cells were infected at an MOI of 0.01, and the infected cell culture supernatant was collected at 72 h postinfection. Virus was inactivated by the addition of 0.05% beta-propiolactone (54) followed by incubation at 4°C for 18 h. The beta-propiolactone was inactivated by incubation at 37°C for 2 h, the inactivated virions were pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 25,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C, and protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Animal experiments.
Male and female golden Syrian hamsters (7 to 8 weeks of age) were purchased from Envigo (Haslett, MI). Animals were housed under standard housing conditions (68 to 76°F, 30 to 70% relative humidity, 12-h light/12-h dark cycle) in positive/negative control (PNC) cages (Allentown, NJ) with paper bedding (Teklad 7099 TEK-Fresh, Envigo, Indianapolis, IN) in an animal biological safety level 3 (ABSL-3) facility at the Johns Hopkins University-Koch Cancer Research Building. Animals were given nesting material (Enviropak, Lab Supply, Fort Worth, TX) and ad libitum reverse osmosis (RO) water and feed (2018 SX Teklad, Envigo, Madison, WI). After 1 to 2 weeks of acclimation, animals (8 to 10 weeks of age) were inoculated with 105 TCID50 of SARS-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020 in 100 μl of DMEM (50 μl/naris) through the intranasal route under ketamine (60 to 80 mg/kg) and xylazine (4 to 5 mg/kg) anesthesia administered intraperitoneally. Control animals received an equivalent volume of DMEM. Animals were randomly assigned to be euthanized at 2, 4, 7, 14, or 28 days postinfection (dpi). Body mass was measured at the day of inoculation (baseline) and endpoint, with daily measurements up to 10 dpi and on 14, 21, and 28 dpi, when applicable per group. Blood samples were collected preinoculation (baseline) and at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 dpi, when applicable per group. Survival blood collection was performed on the sublingual vein, whereas terminal bleeding was done by cardiac puncture under isoflurane (500-μl drop jar; Fluriso, VetOne, Boise, ID) anesthesia. Blood was collected into EDTA (survival and terminal) and/or sodium citrate tubes (terminal). Plasma was separated by blood centrifugation at 3,500 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. After cardiac puncture, animals were humanely euthanized using a euthanasia solution (Euthasol, Virbac, Fort Worth, TX). Nasal turbinates, trachea, and lung samples for antibody/cytokine assays and virus titration were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
Determination of infectious virus titers and viral genome copies in tissue homogenates.
To obtain tissue homogenates, DMEM with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin was added (10% wt/vol) to tubes containing hamster nasal turbinate, lung, and tracheal tissue samples. Lysing Matrix D beads were added to each tube, and the samples were homogenized in a FastPrep-24 benchtop bead beating system (MPBio) for 40 s at 6.0 m/s, followed by centrifugation for 5 min at 10,000 × g at room temperature. Samples were returned to ice, and the supernatant was distributed equally into 2 tubes. To inactivate SARS-CoV-2, Triton X-100 was added to one of the tubes to a final concentration of 0.5% and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The homogenates were stored at −70°C.
Infectious virus titers in respiratory tissue homogenates were determined by TCID50 assay (14, 54). Briefly, tissue homogenates were 10-fold serially diluted in infection medium (CM with 2.5% instead of 10% FBS), transferred in sextuplicate into the 96-well plates confluent with Vero-E6-TMPRSS2 cells, incubated at 37°C for 4 days, and stained with naphthol blue black solution for visualization. The infectious virus titers in TCID50/ml were determined by the Reed and Muench method. For detection of SARS-CoV-2 genome copies, RNA was extracted from lungs using the Qiagen viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen), and reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed as described (55).
Computed tomography and image analysis.
Live animals were imaged inside in-house-developed, sealed biocontainment devices compliant with BSL-3, as previously reported (56). Seven days postinfection, SARS-CoV-2-infected male (n = 12), female (n = 12), placebo-treated male (n = 13), and E2-treated male (n = 13) hamsters underwent chest CT using the nanoScan positron emission tomography (PET)/CT (Mediso USA, MA, USA) small animal imager. CT images were visualized and analyzed using the VivoQuant 2020 lung segmentation tool (Invicro, MA, USA) (57). Briefly, an entire lung volume (LV) was created, and volumes of interests (VOIs) were shaped around the pulmonary lesions using global thresholding for Hounsfield Units (HU) ≥ 0, and disease severity (CT score) was quantified as the percentage of diseased lung in each animal. The investigators were blinded to the group assignments.
Hormone replacement and quantification.
Estradiol (E2) capsules were prepared with Silastic brand medical-grade tubing (0.062 in. inside diameter [i.d.] × 0.125 in. outside diameter [o.d.]) 10 mm in length, sealed with Factor II 6382 room temperature vulcanizing silicone and elastomer and filled 5 mm with 17β-estradiol (58). Capsules were incubated overnight in sterile saline at 37°C prior to implantation. The E2 dosage was chosen because this size capsule has previously been shown to produce blood levels within the physiological range of E2 measured in intact female hamsters during early proestrus (when E2 levels are at their peak) (59, 60). Circulating concentrations of E2 were measured by a rodent estradiol ELISA kit as per manufacturer’s instructions (Calbiotech, CA).
Antibody ELISAs.
The hamster antibody ELISA protocol was modified from the human COVID-19 antibody ELISA protocol described previously (14). ELISA plates (96-well plates; Immunol 4HBX, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with either spike receptor-binding domain (S-RBD) or whole-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 proteins (2 μg/ml, 50 μl/well) in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated at 4°C overnight. Coated plates were washed three times with wash buffer (1× PBS + 0.1% Tween 20), blocked with 3% nonfat milk solution in wash buffer, and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. After incubation, blocking buffer was discarded, 2-fold serially diluted plasma (starting at a 1:100 dilution) or tissue homogenates (starting at a 1:10 dilution) were added, and plates were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After washing the plates 3 times, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary IgG (1:10,000; Abcam, MA, USA), IgA (1:250; Brookwood Biomedical, AL, USA), or IgM (1:250; Brookwood Biomedical, AL, USA) antibodies were added. After addition of secondary IgG antibody, plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 h, while for IgA and IgM antibodies, plates were incubated at 4°C overnight. Sample and antibody dilutions were done in 1% nonfat milk solution in wash buffer. Following washing, reactions were developed by adding 100 μl/well of Sigmafast OPD (o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride) (MilliporeSigma) solution for 10 min and stopped by adding 3 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution; plates were read at a 490-nm wavelength using an ELISA plate reader (BioTek Instruments). The endpoint antibody titer was determined by using a cutoff value that is three times the absorbance of the first dilution of mock (uninfected) animal samples.
Microneutralization assay.
Heat-inactivated (56°C, 35 min) plasma samples were 2-fold serially diluted in infection medium (starting at a 1:20 dilution) and incubated with 100 TCID50 of SARS-CoV-2. After a 1-h incubation at room temperature, plasma-virus mix was transferred into a 96-well plate confluent with Vero-E6-TMPRSS2 cells in sextuplet. After 6 h, inocula were removed, fresh infection medium was added, and plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 days. Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and stained with naphthol blue black solution, and neutralizing antibody titer was calculated as described (14).
Cytokine RT-qPCR.
Flash-frozen hamster lung tissue was sectioned on dry ice and lysed in ice-cold TRIzol using the protein safe hard tissue homogenizing kit (CK28-R, Percellys) in combination with a manufacturer-recommended bead-beating protocol (Percellys Evolution; 8,500 rpm, three 15-s cycles with 30-s breaks on ice after each cycle). TRIzol lysates were immediately processed to harvest total RNA. Total RNA was extracted using the miRNeasy minikit (217004, Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and quantity were evaluated using a Nanodrop. Two-step RT-qPCR was performed on a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (ThermoFisher Scientific) using the high-capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit (4387406, ThermoFisher Scientific) followed by Power SYBR green PCR master mix (436877, Applied Biosystems) and optimized forward and reverse primer pairs (IDT). RT-qPCR sequences for each primer pair used in these studies are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Gene name | Forward primer 5′ to 3′ | Reverse primer 5′ to 3′ | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
γ-Actin | ACAGAGAGAAGATGACGCAGATAATG | GCCTGAATGGCCACGTACA | (61) |
β-Actin | CCATTGGCAACGAGCGGTT | CCACAGGATTCCATACCCAGGAAG | |
IL-1β | TGAGGTTGACGG GCTCCAAAA | ACAGGGGTGTTC CACAGCTT | |
TNF-α | TGAGCCATCGTG CCAATG | AGCCCGTCTGCT GGTATCAC | (61) |
IL-6 | TGTCTTCTTGGGACTGCTGC | CCAAACCTCCGACTT GTTGA | (62) |
IFN-α | AGACTGGGAGTTGCCTGTGA | GAGGAATCCAGGGCTTTCCAG | (62) |
IFN-β | CCATCATGACCAACAGGTGGA | GTCTGGCCTCAAGTTCCTCG | |
IFN-γ | ATGGAGGGGACCTCGTCTTT | GATGGCCTGGTTGTCCTTCA |
Cytokine ELISAs.
Cytokine concentrations in Triton X-100-inactivated lung and spleen homogenates were determined by individual ELISA kits for hamster IFN-α (https://mybiosource.com; MBS010919), IFN-β (https://mybiosource.com; MBS014227), TNF-α (https://mybiosource.com; MBS046042), IL-1β (https://mybiosource.com; MBS283040), IFN-γ (ARP; EHA0005), IL-10 (ARP; EHA0008), and IL-6 (ARP; EHA0006) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were prediluted 1:5 to 1:10 as necessary in the appropriate kit sample dilution buffer. Total protein in the homogenates was measured by BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Statistical analyses.
Statistical analyses were done in GraphPad Prism 9. Changes in body mass were compared using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test. Chest CT scores were compared by unpaired Mann-Whitney test. E2 concentrations were compared by two-tailed unpaired t test. Virus titers and antibody responses were log transformed and compared using two-way ANOVA or mixed-effects analysis followed by Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test. Cytokine concentrations were normalized to total protein content in lung homogenates and compared using two-way ANOVA. Associations between cytokines and virus titers in lungs were conducted using Spearman correlational analyses. Differences were considered to be significant at a P value of <0.05.
Data availability.
All data will be made publicly available upon publication and upon request for peer review.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Vice Dean of Research, Antony Rosen, for providing research funds to develop this model and conduct this research. We also thank the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Hamster Study Group members for weekly discussions and participation in these studies, particularly the veterinarians and animal care staff who ensured proper care of all animals in this study. A.P. would like to dedicate the manuscript to the memory of R. Mark Buller, whose collaborations on the golden Syrian hamster model for SARS-CoV infection formed the basis for this study.
These studies were supported through the generosity of the collective community of donors to the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine for COVID research with supplemental funds from The Johns Hopkins Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS; HHSN272201400007C; A.P. and S.L.K.), the NIH/NCI COVID-19 Serology Center of Excellence U54CA260492 (S.L.K.), the NIH/ORWH/NIA Specialized Center of Research Excellence in Sex Differences U54AG062333 (S.L.K.), R01AI153349 (S.K.J.), support from the Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research (Johns Hopkins University), and NIH T32OD011089 (J.L.M.).
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
P.C.K., J.L.M., A.P., S.K.J., and S.L.K. conceptualized and designed the study. S.D., C.A.R-B., P.S.C., J.S.V., A.A.O., K.F., A.R.L.M., F.M., S.E.B., A.M.B., J.B., N.C., M.B., F.R.D., M.S., K.A.M-P., and S.K.J. designed and performed animal experiments. C.A.R-B., K.F., F.M., and M.B. performed chest CT scans. A.P., R.Z., P.M., A.E.J., N.M., and M.J.B. grew virus, did virus quantification, and produced antigens required to run ELISAs. S.D., K.L., P.S.C., A.L.M., and A.P. performed antibody assays. S.D., P.S.C., J.R.C., M.M.L., D.Q., and P.C.K. performed cytokine assays. S.D. and C.A.R-B. ran statistical analyses on the data. The Study Group Members performed animal experiments, tissue processing, and data management. S.D. and S.L.K. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors read and provided edits to drafts and approved the final submission.
Additional Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Hamster Study Group members include Cory F. Brayton, Bess Carlson, Selena Guerrero-Martin, Eric K. Hutchinson, Andrew L. Johanson, Maggie Lowman, Amanda Maxwell, Megan E. McCarron, Kathleen R. Mulka, Suzanne E. Queen, Erin N. Shirk, Clarisse V. Solis, Rebecca T. Veenhuis, and Rachel Vistein (Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD), Lisa Pieterse (W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD), Patrick M. Tarwater (Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD), and Cynthia A. Zahnow (Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD).
Footnotes
Citation Dhakal S, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Zhou R, Creisher PS, Villano JS, Littlefield K, Ruelas Castillo J, Marinho P, Jedlicka AE, Ordonez AA, Bahr M, Majewska N, Betenbaugh MJ, Flavahan K, Mueller ARL, Looney MM, Quijada D, Mota F, Beck SE, Brockhurst J, Braxton AM, Castell N, Stover M, D’Alessio FR, Metcalf Pate KA, Karakousis PC, Mankowski JL, Pekosz A, Jain SK, Klein SL, for the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Hamster Study Group. 2021. Sex differences in lung imaging and SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in a COVID-19 golden Syrian hamster model. mBio 12:e00974-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00974-21.
Contributor Information
Joseph L. Mankowski, Email: jmankows@jhmi.edu.
Andrew Pekosz, Email: apekosz1@jhu.edu.
Sanjay K. Jain, Email: sjain5@jhmi.edu.
Sabra L. Klein, Email: sklein2@jhu.edu.
Carolyn B. Coyne, Duke University School of Medicine
REFERENCES
- 1.Jin J-M, Bai P, He W, Wu F, Liu X-F, Han D-M, Liu S, Yang J-K. 2020. Gender differences in patients with COVID-19: focus on severity and mortality. Front Public Health 8:152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meng Y, Wu P, Lu W, Liu K, Ma K, Huang L, Cai J, Zhang H, Qin Y, Sun H, Ding W, Gui L, Wu P. 2020. Sex-specific clinical characteristics and prognosis of coronavirus disease-19 infection in Wuhan, China: a retrospective study of 168 severe patients. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008520. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Salje H, Tran Kiem C, Lefrancq N, Courtejoie N, Bosetti P, Paireau J, Andronico A, Hoze N, Richet J, Dubost CL, Le Strat Y, Lessler J, Levy-Bruhl D, Fontanet A, Opatowski L, Boelle PY, Cauchemez S. 2020. Estimating the burden of SARS-CoV-2 in France. Science 369:208–211. doi: 10.1126/science.abc3517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.GlobalHealth5050. The sex, gender and COVID-19 project. https://globalhealth5050.org/the-sex-gender-and-covid-19-project/. Accessed 28 December 2020.
- 5.Peckham H, de Gruijter NM, Raine C, Radziszewska A, Ciurtin C, Wedderburn LR, Rosser EC, Webb K, Deakin CT. 2020. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat Commun 11:6317. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Klein SL, Dhakal S, Ursin RL, Deshpande S, Sandberg K, Mauvais-Jarvis F. 2020. Biological sex impacts COVID-19 outcomes. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008570. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galasso V, Pons V, Profeta P, Becher M, Brouard S, Foucault M. 2020. Gender differences in COVID-19 attitudes and behavior: panel evidence from eight countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:27285–27291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012520117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scully EP, Schumock G, Fu M, Massaccesi G, Muschelli J, Betz J, Klein EY, West NE, Robinson M, Garibaldi BT, Bandeen-Roche K, Zeger S, Klein SL, Gupta A, JH-CROWN registry team . 2021. Sex and gender differences in COVID testing, hospital admission, presentation, and drivers of severe outcomes in the DC/Maryland region. medRxiv 10.1101/2021.04.05.21253827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scully EP, Haverfield J, Ursin RL, Tannenbaum C, Klein SL. 2020. Considering how biological sex impacts immune responses and COVID-19 outcomes. Nat Rev Immunol 20:442–447. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0348-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bunders MJ, Altfeld M. 2020. Implications of sex differences in immunity for SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and design of therapeutic interventions. Immunity 53:487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van der Made CI, Simons A, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers J, van den Heuvel G, Mantere T, Kersten S, van Deuren RC, Steehouwer M, van Reijmersdal SV, Jaeger M, Hofste T, Astuti G, Corominas Galbany J, van der Schoot V, van der Hoeven H, Hagmolen Of Ten Have W, Klijn E, van den Meer C, Fiddelaers J, de Mast Q, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Joosten LAB, Yntema HG, Gilissen C, Nelen M, van der Meer JWM, Brunner HG, Netea MG, van de Veerdonk FL, Hoischen A. 2020. Presence of genetic variants among young men with severe COVID-19. JAMA 324:663–673. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.13719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vahidy FS, Pan AP, Ahnstedt H, Munshi Y, Choi HA, Tiruneh Y, Nasir K, Kash BA, Andrieni JD, McCullough LD. 2021. Sex differences in susceptibility, severity, and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019: cross-sectional analysis from a diverse US metropolitan area. PLoS One 16:e0245556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takahashi T, Ellingson MK, Wong P, Israelow B, Lucas C, Klein J, Silva J, Mao T, Oh JE, Tokuyama M, Lu P, Venkataraman A, Park A, Liu F, Meir A, Sun J, Wang EY, Casanovas-Massana A, Wyllie AL, Vogels CBF, Earnest R, Lapidus S, Ott IM, Moore AJ, Yale IMPACT Research Team, Shaw A, Fournier JB, Odio CD, Farhadian S, Dela Cruz C, Grubaugh ND, Schulz WL, Ring AM, Ko AI, Omer SB, Iwasaki A. 2020. Sex differences in immune responses that underlie COVID-19 disease outcomes. Nature 588:315–320. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2700-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Klein SL, Pekosz A, Park HS, Ursin RL, Shapiro JR, Benner SE, Littlefield K, Kumar S, Naik HM, Betenbaugh MJ, Shrestha R, Wu AA, Hughes RM, Burgess I, Caturegli P, Laeyendecker O, Quinn TC, Sullivan D, Shoham S, Redd AD, Bloch EM, Casadevall A, Tobian AA. 2020. Sex, age, and hospitalization drive antibody responses in a COVID-19 convalescent plasma donor population. J Clin Invest 130:6141–6150. doi: 10.1172/JCI142004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shapiro JR, Klein SL, Morgan R. 2021. COVID-19: use intersectional analyses to close gaps in outcomes and vaccination. Nature 591:202. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-00577-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Golden JW, Cline CR, Zeng X, Garrison AR, Carey BD, Mucker EM, White LE, Shamblin JD, Brocato RL, Liu J, Babka AM, Rauch HB, Smith JM, Hollidge BS, Fitzpatrick C, Badger CV, Hooper JW. 2020. Human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop severe and fatal respiratory disease. JCI Insight 5:e142032. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.142032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oladunni FS, Park JG, Pino PA, Gonzalez O, Akhter A, Allue-Guardia A, Olmo-Fontanez A, Gautam S, Garcia-Vilanova A, Ye C, Chiem K, Headley C, Dwivedi V, Parodi LM, Alfson KJ, Staples HM, Schami A, Garcia JI, Whigham A, Platt RN, II, Gazi M, Martinez J, Chuba C, Earley S, Rodriguez OH, Mdaki SD, Kavelish KN, Escalona R, Hallam CRA, Christie C, Patterson JL, Anderson TJC, Carrion R, Jr, Dick EJ, Jr, Hall-Ursone S, Schlesinger LS, Alvarez X, Kaushal D, Giavedoni LD, Turner J, Martinez-Sobrido L, Torrelles JB. 2020. Lethality of SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18 human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 transgenic mice. Nat Commun 11:6122. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19891-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dinnon KH, III, Leist SR, Schäfer A, Edwards CE, Martinez DR, Montgomery SA, West A, Yount BL, Jr, Hou YJ, Adams LE, Gully KL, Brown AJ, Huang E, Bryant MD, Choong IC, Glenn JS, Gralinski LE, Sheahan TP, Baric RS. 2020. A mouse-adapted model of SARS-CoV-2 to test COVID-19 countermeasures. Nature 586:560–566. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2708-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jiang R-D, Liu M-Q, Chen Y, Shan C, Zhou Y-W, Shen X-R, Li Q, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Si H-R, Wang Q, Min J, Wang X, Zhang W, Li B, Zhang H-J, Baric RS, Zhou P, Yang X-L, Shi Z-L. 2020. Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in transgenic mice expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Cell 182:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Leist SR, Dinnon KH, III, Schäfer A, Tse LV, Okuda K, Hou YJ, West A, Edwards CE, Sanders W, Fritch EJ, Gully KL, Scobey T, Brown AJ, Sheahan TP, Moorman NJ, Boucher RC, Gralinski LE, Montgomery SA, Baric RS. 2020. A mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 induces acute lung injury and mortality in standard laboratory mice. Cell 183:1070–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Osterrieder N, Bertzbach LD, Dietert K, Abdelgawad A, Vladimirova D, Kunec D, Hoffmann D, Beer M, Gruber AD, Trimpert J. 2020. Age-dependent progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Syrian hamsters. Viruses 12:779. doi: 10.3390/v12070779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rosenke K, Meade-White K, Letko M, Clancy C, Hansen F, Liu Y, Okumura A, Tang-Huau T-L, Li R, Saturday G, Feldmann F, Scott D, Wang Z, Munster V, Jarvis MA, Feldmann H. 2020. Defining the Syrian hamster as a highly susceptible preclinical model for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg Microbes Infect 9:2673–2684. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1858177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Melo GD, Lazarini F, Larrous F, Feige L, Kergoat L, Marchio A, Pineau P, Lecuit M, Lledo P-M, Changeux J-P, Bourhy H. 2020. Anti-COVID-19 efficacy of ivermectin in the golden hamster. bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.11.21.392639. [DOI]
- 24.Chan JF, Zhang AJ, Yuan S, Poon VK, Chan CC, Lee AC, Chan WM, Fan Z, Tsoi HW, Wen L, Liang R, Cao J, Chen Y, Tang K, Luo C, Cai JP, Kok KH, Chu H, Chan KH, Sridhar S, Chen Z, Chen H, To KK, Yuen KY. 2020. Simulation of the clinical and pathological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a golden Syrian hamster model: implications for disease pathogenesis and transmissibility. Clin Infect Dis 71:2428–2446. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sia SF, Yan LM, Chin AWH, Fung K, Choy KT, Wong AYL, Kaewpreedee P, Perera RAPM, Poon LLM, Nicholls JM, Peiris M, Yen HL. 2020. Pathogenesis and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in golden hamsters. Nature 583:834–838. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2342-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Imai M, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Hatta M, Loeber S, Halfmann PJ, Nakajima N, Watanabe T, Ujie M, Takahashi K, Ito M, Yamada S, Fan S, Chiba S, Kuroda M, Guan L, Takada K, Armbrust T, Balogh A, Furusawa Y, Okuda M, Ueki H, Yasuhara A, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Lopes TJS, Kiso M, Yamayoshi S, Kinoshita N, Ohmagari N, Hattori SI, Takeda M, Mitsuya H, Krammer F, Suzuki T, Kawaoka Y. 2020. Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:16587–16595. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009799117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moradi B, Ghanaati H, Kazemi MA, Gity M, Hashemi H, Davari-Tanha F, Chavoshi M, Rouzrokh P, Kolahdouzan K. 2020. Implications of sex difference in CT scan findings and outcome of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2:e200248. doi: 10.1148/ryct.2020200248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dangis A, De Brucker N, Heremans A, Gillis M, Frans J, Demeyere A, Symons R. 2020. Impact of gender on extent of lung injury in COVID-19. Clin Radiol 75:554–556. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiong Y, Zhong Q, Palmer T, Benner A, Wang L, Suresh K, Damico R, D’Alessio FR. 2021. Estradiol resolves pneumonia via ERβ in regulatory T cells. JCI Insight 6:e133251. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.133251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vermillion MS, Ursin RL, Attreed SE, Klein SL. 2018. Estriol reduces pulmonary immune cell recruitment and inflammation to protect female mice from severe influenza. Endocrinology 159:3306–3320. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Robinson DP, Lorenzo ME, Jian W, Klein SL. 2011. Elevated 17β-estradiol protects females from influenza A virus pathogenesis by suppressing inflammatory responses. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002149. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li SA, Xue Y, Xie Q, Li CI, Li JJ. 1994. Serum and tissue levels of estradiol during estrogen-induced renal tumorigenesis in the Syrian hamster. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 48:283–286. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(94)90157-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fink AL, Engle K, Ursin RL, Tang W-Y, Klein SL. 2018. Biological sex affects vaccine efficacy and protection against influenza in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:12477–12482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805268115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ogega CO, Skinner NE, Blair PW, Park HS, Littlefield K, Ganesan A, Dhakal S, Ladiwala P, Antar AA, Ray SC, Betenbaugh MJ, Pekosz A, Klein SL, Manabe YC, Cox AL, Bailey JR. 2021. Durable SARS-CoV-2 B cell immunity after mild or severe disease. J Clin Invest 131:e145516. doi: 10.1172/JCI145516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hoagland DA, Moller R, Uhl SA, Oishi K, Frere J, Golynker I, Horiuchi S, Panis M, Blanco-Melo D, Sachs D, Arkun K, Lim JK, tenOever BR. 2021. Leveraging the antiviral type I interferon system as a first line of defense against SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity. Immunity 54:557–570. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leung K, Shum MH, Leung GM, Lam TT, Wu JT. 2021. Early transmissibility assessment of the N501Y mutant strains of SARS-CoV-2 in the United Kingdom, October to November 2020. Euro Surveill 26:2002106. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.26.1.2002106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hayashi T, Yaegashi N, Konishi I. 2020. Effect of RBD mutation (Y453F) in spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on neutralizing antibody affinity. bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.11.27.401893. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Thomson EC, Rosen LE, Shepherd JG, Spreafico R, da Silva Filipe A, Wojcechowskyj JA, Davis C, Piccoli L, Pascall DJ, Dillen J, Lytras S, Czudnochowski N, Shah R, Meury M, Jesudason N, De Marco A, Li K, Bassi J, O’Toole A, Pinto D, Colquhoun RM, Culap K, Jackson B, Zatta F, Rambaut A, Jaconi S, Sreenu VB, Nix J, Zhang I, Jarrett RF, Glass WG, Beltramello M, Nomikou K, Pizzuto M, Tong L, Cameroni E, Croll TI, Johnson N, Di Iulio J, Wickenhagen A, Ceschi A, Harbison AM, Mair D, Ferrari P, Smollett K, Sallusto F, Carmichael S, Garzoni C, Nichols J, Galli M, et al. 2021. Circulating SARS-CoV-2 spike N439K variants maintain fitness while evading antibody-mediated immunity. Cell 184:1171–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sterlin D, Mathian A, Miyara M, Mohr A, Anna F, Claer L, Quentric P, Fadlallah J, Devilliers H, Ghillani P, Gunn C, Hockett R, Mudumba S, Guihot A, Luyt CE, Mayaux J, Beurton A, Fourati S, Bruel T, Schwartz O, Lacorte JM, Yssel H, Parizot C, Dorgham K, Charneau P, Amoura Z, Gorochov G. 2021. IgA dominates the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Sci Transl Med 13:eabd2223. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abd2223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Russell MW, Moldoveanu Z, Ogra PL, Mestecky J. 2020. Mucosal immunity in COVID-19: a neglected but critical aspect of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front Immunol 11:611337. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.611337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lee AC, Zhang AJ, Chan JF, Li C, Fan Z, Liu F, Chen Y, Liang R, Sridhar S, Cai JP, Poon VK, Chan CC, To KK, Yuan S, Zhou J, Chu H, Yuen KY. 2020. Oral SARS-CoV-2 inoculation establishes subclinical respiratory infection with virus shedding in golden Syrian hamsters. Cell Rep Med 1:100121. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Simpson S, Kay FU, Abbara S, Bhalla S, Chung JH, Chung M, Henry TS, Kanne JP, Kligerman S, Ko JP, Litt H. 2020. Radiological Society of North America expert consensus statement on reporting chest CT findings related to COVID-19. Endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Radiology, the American College of Radiology, and RSNA - secondary publication. J Thorac Imaging 35:219–227. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dhindsa S, Zhang N, McPhaul MJ, Wu Z, Ghoshal AK, Erlich EC, Mani K, Randolph GJ, Edwards JR, Mudd PA, Diwan A. 2021. Association of circulating sex hormones with inflammation and disease severity in patients with COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2111398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vom Steeg LG, Vermillion MS, Hall OJ, Alam O, McFarland R, Chen H, Zirkin B, Klein SL. 2016. Age and testosterone mediate influenza pathogenesis in male mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 311:L1234–L1244. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00352.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vom Steeg LG, Dhakal S, Woldetsadik YA, Park HS, Mulka KR, Reilly EC, Topham DJ, Klein SL. 2020. Androgen receptor signaling in the lungs mitigates inflammation and improves the outcome of influenza in mice. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008506. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang AJ, Lee AC, Chu H, Chan JF, Fan Z, Li C, Liu F, Chen Y, Yuan S, Poon VK, Chan CC, Cai JP, Wu KL, Sridhar S, Chan YS, Yuen KY. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 infects and damages the mature and immature olfactory sensory neurons of hamsters. Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Brocato RL, Principe LM, Kim RK, Zeng X, Williams JA, Liu Y, Li R, Smith JM, Golden JW, Gangemi D, Youssef S, Wang Z, Glanville J, Hooper JW. 2020. Disruption of adaptive immunity enhances disease in SARS-CoV-2-infected Syrian hamsters. J Virol 94:e01683-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01683-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tostanoski LH, Wegmann F, Martinot AJ, Loos C, McMahan K, Mercado NB, Yu J, Chan CN, Bondoc S, Starke CE, Nekorchuk M, Busman-Sahay K, Piedra-Mora C, Wrijil LM, Ducat S, Custers J, Atyeo C, Fischinger S, Burke JS, Feldman J, Hauser BM, Caradonna TM, Bondzie EA, Dagotto G, Gebre MS, Jacob-Dolan C, Lin Z, Mahrokhian SH, Nampanya F, Nityanandam R, Pessaint L, Porto M, Ali V, Benetiene D, Tevi K, Andersen H, Lewis MG, Schmidt AG, Lauffenburger DA, Alter G, Estes JD, Schuitemaker H, Zahn R, Barouch DH. 2020. Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 severe clinical disease in hamsters. Nat Med 26:1694–1700. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1070-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chan JF, Yuan S, Zhang AJ, Poon VK, Chan CC, Lee AC, Fan Z, Li C, Liang R, Cao J, Tang K, Luo C, Cheng VC, Cai JP, Chu H, Chan KH, To KK, Sridhar S, Yuen KY. 2020. Surgical mask partition reduces the risk of noncontact transmission in a golden Syrian hamster model for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis 71:2139–2149. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Port JR, Yinda CK, Owusu IO, Holbrook M, Fischer R, Bushmaker T, Avanzato VA, Schulz JE, van Doremalen N, Clancy CS, Munster VJ. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 disease severity and transmission efficiency is increased for airborne but not fomite exposure in Syrian hamsters. bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.12.28.424565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Baum A, Ajithdoss D, Copin R, Zhou A, Lanza K, Negron N, Ni M, Wei Y, Mohammadi K, Musser B, Atwal GS, Oyejide A, Goez-Gazi Y, Dutton J, Clemmons E, Staples HM, Bartley C, Klaffke B, Alfson K, Gazi M, Gonzalez O, Dick E, Jr, Carrion R, Jr, Pessaint L, Porto M, Cook A, Brown R, Ali V, Greenhouse J, Taylor T, Andersen H, Lewis MG, Stahl N, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Kyratsous CA. 2020. REGN-COV2 antibodies prevent and treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in rhesus macaques and hamsters. Science 370:1110–1115. doi: 10.1126/science.abe2402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kreye J, Reincke SM, Kornau HC, Sanchez-Sendin E, Corman VM, Liu H, Yuan M, Wu NC, Zhu X, Lee CD, Trimpert J, Holtje M, Dietert K, Stoffler L, von Wardenburg N, van Hoof S, Homeyer MA, Hoffmann J, Abdelgawad A, Gruber AD, Bertzbach LD, Vladimirova D, Li LY, Barthel PC, Skriner K, Hocke AC, Hippenstiel S, Witzenrath M, Suttorp N, Kurth F, Franke C, Endres M, Schmitz D, Jeworowski LM, Richter A, Schmidt ML, Schwarz T, Muller MA, Drosten C, Wendisch D, Sander LE, Osterrieder N, Wilson IA, Pruss H. 2020. A therapeutic non-self-reactive SARS-CoV-2 antibody protects from lung pathology in a COVID-19 hamster model. Cell 183:1058–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schafer A, Muecksch F, Lorenzi JCC, Leist SR, Cipolla M, Bournazos S, Schmidt F, Maison RM, Gazumyan A, Martinez DR, Baric RS, Robbiani DF, Hatziioannou T, Ravetch JV, Bieniasz PD, Bowen RA, Nussenzweig MC, Sheahan TP. 2021. Antibody potency, effector function, and combinations in protection and therapy for SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo. J Exp Med 218:e20201993. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schaecher SR, Mackenzie JM, Pekosz A. 2007. The ORF7b protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is expressed in virus-infected cells and incorporated into SARS-CoV particles. J Virol 81:718–731. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01691-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gniazdowski V, Morris CP, Wohl S, Mehoke T, Ramakrishnan S, Thielen P, Powell H, Smith B, Armstrong DT, Herrera M, Reifsnyder C, Sevdali M, Carroll KC, Pekosz A, Mostafa HH. 2020. Repeat COVID-19 molecular testing: correlation of SARS-CoV-2 culture with molecular assays and cycle thresholds. Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ordonez AA, Wintaco LM, Mota F, Restrepo AF, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Reyes CF, Uribe LG, Abhishek S, D’Alessio FR, Holt DP, Dannals RF, Rowe SP, Castillo VR, Pomper MG, Granados U, Jain SK. 2021. Imaging Enterobacterales infections in patients using pathogen-specific positron emission tomography. Sci Transl Med 13:eabe9805. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abe9805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hesterman J, Ghayoor A, Novick A, Wang X, Cadornet Y, Becerra L, Gunn R, Avants B. 2019. Multi-atlas approaches for image segmentation across modality, species and application area. future 6:7. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Potluri T, Fink AL, Sylvia KE, Dhakal S, Vermillion MS, Vom Steeg L, Deshpande S, Narasimhan H, Klein SL. 2019. Age-associated changes in the impact of sex steroids on influenza vaccine responses in males and females. NPJ Vaccines 4:29. doi: 10.1038/s41541-019-0124-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Faruzzi AN, Solomon MB, Demas GE, Huhman KL. 2005. Gonadal hormones modulate the display of submissive behavior in socially defeated female Syrian hamsters. Horm Behav 47:569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Albers HE, Prishkolnik J. 1992. Sex differences in odor-stimulated flank marking in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Horm Behav 26:229–239. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(92)90044-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Espitia CM, Zhao W, Saldarriaga O, Osorio Y, Harrison LM, Cappello M, Travi BL, Melby PC. 2010. Duplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR to determine cytokine mRNA expression in a hamster model of New World cutaneous leishmaniasis. BMC Immunol 11:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-11-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang AJ, Lee AC, Chan JF, Liu F, Li C, Chen Y, Chu H, Lau SY, Wang P, Chan CC, Poon VK, Yuan S, To KK, Chen H, Yuen KY. 2020. Co-infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus enhances the severity of pneumonia in golden Syrian hamsters. Clin Infect Dis 72:e978–e992. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data will be made publicly available upon publication and upon request for peer review.