Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 1974 Jun 1;15(2):244–255. doi: 10.1186/BF03547485

The Microflora and Concentrations of Volatile Fatty Acids in The Rumen of Cattle Fed on Single Component Rations

Bakteriefloraen og koncentrationen af flygtige fedtsyrer i vommen hos køer fodret med forskellige fodermidler

Jens Wolstrup 1,2,, Vagn Jensen 1,2, Kurt Jensen 1,2
PMCID: PMC8407178  PMID: 4854959

Abstract

The composition of the rumen microflora and the volatile fatty acids were examined in cattle free-grazing on grass or stall-fed on hay, grass pellets, oats or dried beet pulp with molasses. Total and viable counts of anaerobic bacteria were highest on the grass feeding, but viable counts as a percentage of total counts were highest when oats or beet pulp with molasses were fed. Counts of cellulolytic bacteria were lowest on these latter 2 diets, and highest on grass or grass pellet diets. Studies of the anaerobic flora showed that the composition in animals fed on grass pellets resembled more that found in animals free-grazing on grass than in those fed on hay. Counts of aerotolerant bacteria were only a small percentage of the total count, but were highest on the hay diet. On this latter diet and on grass-feeding the streptococci (identified as Streptococcus bovis) were predominant, but contrary to expectation, streptococci were found only in small numbers on the oats diet, where coryneform rods were the major type present. Although a period of 4–6 weeks was allowed for the animals to adapt to the feeds, the 2 periods of feeding on oats and dried beet pulp with molasses markedly affected the composition of the rumen flora in the subsequent periods of feeding grass pellets and hay. Ruinen volatile fatty acid analysis showed a propionogenic effect of oats and the highest percentage of butyric acid when beet pulp with molasses was fed. The expected propionogenic effect of grass pellets was not observed.

Keywords: rumen bacteria, VFA, single componentrations

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Footnotes

The work was financially supported by the Danish Agricultural and Veterinary Research Council.

References

  1. Appleby J. C. The isolation and classification of proteolytic bacteria from the rumen of the sheep. J. gen. Microbiol. 1955;12:526–533. doi: 10.1099/00221287-12-3-526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balch D. A. An estimate of the weights of volatile fatty acids produced in the rumen of lactating cows on a diet of hay and concentrates. Brit. J. Nutr. 1958;12:18–24. doi: 10.1079/BJN19580005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryant M. P., Burkey L. D. Cultural method and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. Numbers and some predominant groups of bacteria in the rumen of cows fed different rations. J. Dairy Sci. 1953;36:205–224. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryant M. P., Robinson I. M. Effects of diet, time after feeding and position sampled on numbers of viable bacteria in the bovine rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 1968;51:1950–1955. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(68)87320-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caldwell D. R., Bryant M. P. Medium without rumen fluid for non-selective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. 1966;14:794–801. doi: 10.1128/AM.14.5.794-801.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eadie J. M., Hyldgaard-Jensen J., Mann S. O., Reid A. S., White-law F. C. Observations on the microbiology and biochemistry of the rumen in cattle given different quantities of a pelleted barley ration. Brit. J. Nutr. 1970;24:157–177. doi: 10.1079/BJN19700018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elias, A.: Personal communication, 1971.
  8. Gouws L., Kistner L. Bacteria in the ovine rumen. IV. Effect of change of diet on the predominant type of cellulosedigesting bacteria. J. agric. Sci. 1965;64:51–57. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gutierrez J. Numbers and characteristic of lactate utilizing organisms in the rumen of cattle. J. Bact. 1953;66:123–128. doi: 10.1128/JB.66.2.123-128.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hungate R. E. The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria. Bact. Rev. 1950;14:1–49. doi: 10.1128/BR.14.1.1-49.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jensen K. Gas-solid adsorption chromatographic determination of short-chain fatty acids in rumen fluid. Acta vet. scand. 1973;14:335–337. doi: 10.1186/BF03547452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kistner A., Gouws L., Gilchrist F. M. Bacteria of the ovine rumen. II. The functional groups fermenting carbohydrates and lactate on a diet of lucerne (Medicago sativa) hay. J. agric. Sci. 1962;59:85–91. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurihara Y., Eadie J. M., Hobson P. N., Mann S. O. Relationship between bacteria and ciliate protozoa in the sheep rumen. J. gen. Microbiol. 1968;51:267–288. doi: 10.1099/00221287-51-2-267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Latham M. J., Sharpe M. E., Sutton J. D. The microbial flora of the rumen of cows fed hay and high cereal rations and its relationship to the fermentation. J. appl. Bact. 1971;34:425–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1971.tb02302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maki L. R., Foster E. M. Effect of roughage in the bovine ration on types of bacteria in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 1957;40:905–913. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(57)94574-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mann S. O. An improved method for determining cellulolytic activity in anaerobic bacteria. J. appl. Bact. 1968;31:241–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1968.tb00363.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oltjen R. R., Gutierrez J., Lehmann R. P., Davis R. E. Rumen chemical and microbial characteristics of steers fed a purified and natural diet. J. Animal Sci. 1966;25:521–525. doi: 10.2527/jas1966.252521x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Perry K. D., Wilson M. K., Newland L. G. M., Briggs C. A. E. The normal flora of the bovine rumen. III. Quantitative and qualitative studies of rumen streptococci. J. appl. Bact. 1955;18:436–442. [Google Scholar]
  19. Thorley C. M., Sharpe M. E., Bryant M. P. Modification of the rumen bacterial flora by feeding cattle ground and pelleted roughage as determined with and without rumen fluid. J. Dairy Sci. 1968;51:1811–1816. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(68)87283-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Warner A. C. I. Some factors influencing the rumen microbial population. J. gen. Microbiol. 1962;28:129–146. doi: 10.1099/00221287-28-1-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Whitelaw F. G., Eadie J. M., Mann S. O., Reid R. S. Some effects of rumen ciliate protozoa in cattle given restricted amounts of a barley diet. Brit. J. Nutr. 1972;27:425–437. doi: 10.1079/BJN19720108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES