ABSTRACT
Microbes are omnipresent in the biosphere and perform biological and chemical processes critical to ecosystem function, nutrient cycling, and global climate regulation. In the ocean, microbes constitute more than two-thirds of biomass with abundances reaching over one million microbial cells per milliliter of seawater. Our understanding of the marine microbial world has rapidly expanded with use of innovative molecular and chemical ‘omics tools to uncover previously hidden taxonomic diversity, spatiotemporal distributions, and novel metabolic functions. Recognition that specific microbial taxa cooccur in consistent patterns in the ocean has implicated microbe-microbe interactions as important, but poorly constrained, regulators of microbial activity. Here, I examine cooperative interactions among marine plankton, with a focus on the metabolic “currencies” that establish microbial partnerships in the surface-ocean trade economy. I discuss current and future directions to study microbial metabolic interactions in order to strengthen our understanding of ecosystem interdependencies and their impact on ocean biogeochemistry.
KEYWORDS: cell signaling, cell-cell interaction, marine microbiology, metabolic regulation, metabolomics, microbial networks, phytoplankton, sulfonates, sulfur metabolism
COMMENTARY
Marine ecosystems are dominated by microscopic organisms that make up over two-thirds of ocean biomass (1) and function as the major primary producers and consumers in the ocean. Each day, unicellular phytoplankton transform 100 million tons of inorganic carbon into organic substrates (2) that fuel the activity of heterotrophic bacteria (3), regulating the balance of carbon remineralization to CO2 and carbon storage in the ocean. Thousands of different molecules make up this microbially cycled pool of organic matter, forming the basis of intricate phytoplankton-bacterial interaction networks. However, linking individual metabolites to taxon-specific interactions is challenging due to the diversity of molecules and interacting organisms simultaneously present in seawater. My research group employs a combination of laboratory, computational, and field-based approaches to decipher currencies and regulatory mechanisms that establish phytoplankton-bacterial interactions (Fig. 1). Most notably, we have demonstrated the role of microbial sulfur-containing metabolites in influencing central biogeochemical reactions in the ocean (4–6). Overall, our pursuit in studying microbial metabolic exchange is centered on understanding how these micrometer-scale interactions impact ecosystem-scale community structure and the fate of elements and climate-active gases in the ocean and atmosphere.
FIG 1.
Microbial metabolic networks in the surface ocean are examined through complementary field-based observations (top left), laboratory coculture systems (top right), and metabolic modeling approaches (bottom center). (Top left) Phytoplankton and bacterial taxa form metabolic networks through the exchange of specific organic metabolites (purple) that include sulfur (yellow)- and/or nitrogen (blue)-containing molecules. Microbial transformation of organic matter ultimately controls ocean biogeochemistry as well as the balance of carbon storage in the ocean and carbon remineralization to CO2 through processes of photosynthesis and respiration. (Top right) To deconstruct microbial metabolic exchanges, coculture model systems have been useful for detecting taxon-specific metabolites that inform our interpretation of field observations. Likewise, field-based observations of community-level dynamics have generated hypotheses about metabolic exchange that can be tested with culture studies. (Bottom center) Metabolic modeling of microbial plankton is an emerging tool that can be integrated with culture and field studies to simulate and predict metabolic fluxes (denoted by thickness of lines) of metabolites (circles) during microbial interactions under specific conditions. While observational data are useful for constraining relevant parameters and improving model accuracy, modeling approaches aid in identifying gaps in our current knowledge that can be approached with future culture and field studies. Iterative application of these tools will improve our predictive capabilities for microbial activity under current and future ocean conditions. Figure illustration and design by Joana C. Carvalho (© Carvalho, printed with permission).
Why costly metabolic interactions develop within microbial communities is a fundamental biological question. In examining metabolic exchange, we grapple with how microbial cooperation alters the rate of carbon-cycle-relevant reactions as well as ecosystem structure and stability. For instance, around half of eukaryotic phytoplankton are auxotrophic for vitamin B12 that they acquire from bacteria (7), and members of B12-requiring phytoplankton and B12-producing bacterial groups have evolutionary histories that point to complex metabolic interactions and coevolution (8). Indeed, coevolving microbes whose growth depends on reciprocal exchange of metabolites rapidly develop a costly metabolic cooperation where both partners increase metabolite production to benefit their corresponding partner (9). Increased metabolite production within interaction networks may also increase the robustness of these communities to ecological disturbance (10). Conversely, species do not have to evolve in a habitat to participate in interactions in that habitat. An organism exists wherever its realized fitness is great enough for persistence, through ecological fitting or readjustment to its habitat (11). Our observations likely reflect some combination of fitting and evolutionary processes that together have shaped microbial communities, with implications for ocean biogeochemistry and vulnerability to a changing climate.
MODEL-SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS
A central avenue of my research program is employing model microbial systems to study phytoplankton-bacterial interactions under controlled laboratory settings. Early in my career, I established a coculture system with the model diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana and model marine bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi to act as representatives for phytoplankton-bacterial interactions in the ocean. I based the model system on vitamin B12 auxotrophy in the diatom, wherein the B12-producing bacterium provided the essential vitamin to the diatom in exchange for organic substrates as food. Using concurrent transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, we identified sulfur- and nitrogen-containing metabolic currencies and signaling mechanisms that mediate their interaction (12–14). A number of newly recognized metabolites used in the marine microbial trade market are transformed through unidentified pathways likely regulated by changes in environmental landscape (e.g., light, nutrient availability, salinity, temperature). A clear step forward is to resolve unknown pathways and environmental regulators that influence the flux and timing of microbial metabolite exchange in our current and future ocean.
Sulfur metabolites facilitate microbial cooperation.
Foremost, model-system studies have revealed sulfur-containing metabolites as important currencies in phytoplankton-bacterial interactions. I found that bacterial heterotrophy was supported by diatom-derived sulfonate molecules not previously recognized in marine systems (12). Additional model organism and metabolomics studies continue to reveal a chemical diversity of microbial sulfur metabolites (5, 15, 16). Concurrent with an expanding repertoire of newly recognized sulfur metabolites, the oceanography community has recognized a large inventory of dissolved organic sulfur in the ocean that is poorly characterized yet whose transformation influences ocean and atmospheric chemistry (4, 6). Sulfur-mediated interactions are a resourceful mechanism in marine ecosystems. Because sulfate concentration is high in seawater (∼28 mM), phytoplankton can leverage this readily available inorganic nutrient to shunt excess reducing power from photosynthesis, and bacterial associates use resulting organic sulfur outputs for growth. Indeed, phytoplankton-derived sulfur metabolites display day-night rhythms in abundance consistent with this idea (17, 18). Regulation of microbial sulfur metabolism is a current gap in our understanding of marine sulfur biogeochemistry that we are now poised to address. My group is currently examining the relationship between light availability, photochemistry, and sulfur metabolism in model diatoms and cocultures to quantify how photosynthetic outputs and redox state regulate production of sulfur metabolites and transfer to bacterial associates.
Microbes participate in active partnerships.
A second important observation from model systems has been recognition and signaling between partners. I identified a bacterial recognition system in T. pseudonana akin to that used in land plants to recognize bacteria (13). Bacteria also use plant hormones and antibiotics to alter phytoplankton cell cycle and growth rate (15, 19). Together, these findings have transformed the historical view of passive interaction among microbes through indirect excretion of metabolites (20) to one in which phytoplankton and bacteria actively adjust their physiology and metabolism to establish partnerships (16). We are currently working with metabolomes from a large culture data set to taxonomically resolve putative signaling molecules in marine microbes, with the idea that these metabolites can be assayed to determine their specific signaling functions.
BRIDGING MODEL SYSTEMS AND FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Our group also aims to bridge findings from “simple” lab systems with observations of “complex” natural systems, using each to inform the other in an iterative process. The T. pseudonana-R. pomeroyi interaction provided a scaffold on which we characterized a suite of structurally related sulfonates in >30 marine microbial taxa. We then bioinformatically inferred metabolic pathways and tracked sulfonate dynamics in natural microbial communities of the North Pacific (17). So far, field observations suggest sulfonate production in phytoplankton is regulated by both light and nutrient availability (17, 18, 21), ideas that we are exploring back in the lab.
In a more expansive analysis of >300 metabolites from microbial culture and field data, we showed that phytoplankton taxonomy imparts a strong influence on the chemical composition of ocean metabolomes (21) with many of these metabolites likely to serve as the substrates in phytoplankton-bacterial exchange. Indeed, bacterial community assembly can be predicted by use of individual phytoplankton-derived metabolites (22, 23). One might say that phytoplankton “farm” bacteria through excreted metabolites, a mechanism that favors evolution of cooperative interactions. Currently, our group is using environmental metatranscriptomics and metabolomics data to identify links between community composition and metabolite exchange across environmental nutrient gradients. Notably, over half of the >300 metabolites detected by Heal et al. (21) could not be identified. It is likely that additional carbon-cycle-relevant currencies are within these unidentified molecules, and continued effort to identify these metabolites is critical. For as long as these molecules remain unrecognized microbial currencies, particularly when abundant plankton groups are involved, they represent gaps in our reconstruction of marine elemental cycles.
FUTURE OUTLOOK: METABOLIC MODELING APPROACHES AND PARALLELS TO OTHER BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
We cannot test a model organism system under all conditions and their intersections relevant to the natural environment. Our observations represent snapshots of interacting partners in time under a particular set of conditions. On the other hand, with field measurements we face the challenge of disentangling multiple, interacting environmental conditions that affect microbial partnerships. With this realization, I have been inspired by the work of van Tol and Armbrust (24) and others in building metabolic models of marine plankton. Metabolic modeling is a fresh lens through which to study marine microbial metabolism, allowing us to test microbes under a more exhaustive and interacting set of conditions that will inform future experiments. Metabolic modeling of T. pseudonana is already pointing us to gaps in our knowledge of respiration and sulfur and nitrogen metabolism that we need to constrain to improve quantitative predictions of metabolite exchange (24). In particular, the work of van Tol and Armbrust (24) shows a coupling of nitrogen and sulfur metabolism in balancing redox state in diatoms, which subsequently impacts the chemistry of organic substrates available to bacterial associates. Looking forward, our team plans to integrate culture studies, field observations, and metabolic models to more accurately quantify microbial metabolic exchange (Fig. 1).
Microbial cooperation is ubiquitous across ecosystems and has played pivotal roles in shaping the life and biogeochemistry of Earth. A reoccurring theme over the course of my research path has been observation of parallels between marine and terrestrial interactions. For instance, use of plant hormones in the mutualistic diatom-bacterial interactions (15) and plant-like bacterial recognition in the T. pseudonana-R. pomeroyi interaction (13) point to signaling analogs. Further, sulfonates have been implicated in terrestrial cyanobacterium-moss symbioses (25). Our group is beginning to extend studies into terrestrial microbial model systems, and we are thrilled about the potential overlaps and contrasts we might find across ecosystems. There are clear cross-ecosystem currencies at play, and identifying how currencies operate in different ecosystems may help us to establish the evolutionary mechanisms and ecological “rules” of cooperative metabolic trade.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank my lab members and H. M. van Tol for thoughtful discussions of these ideas, S. F. McDaniel and E. V. Armbrust for constructive feedback on this text, and J. B. Raina and J. A. Gilbert for the opportunity to participate in this special series. I thank J. C. Carvalho for the design of the main figure in this work.
Research related to these ideas is supported by the Simon Foundation (823165) and University of Florida startup funds.
The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.
This article is part of a special series sponsored by Floré.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bar-On YM, Milo R. 2019. The biomass composition of the oceans: a blueprint of our blue planet. Cell 179:1451–1454. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Falkowski PG, Wilson C. 1992. Phytoplankton productivity in the North Pacific Ocean since 1900 and implications for absorption of anthropogenic CO2. Nature 358:741–743. doi: 10.1038/358741a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F. 1983. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:257–263. doi: 10.3354/meps010257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ksionzek KB, Lechtenfeld OJ, McCallister SL, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Geuer JK, Geibert W, Koch BP. 2016. Dissolved organic sulfur in the ocean: biogeochemistry of a petagram inventory. Science 354:456–459. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moran MA, Durham BP. 2019. Sulfur metabolites in the pelagic ocean. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:665–678. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0250-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Levine NM. 2016. Putting the spotlight on organic sulfur. Science 354:418–419. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Croft MT, Lawrence AD, Raux-Deery E, Warren MJ, Smith AG. 2005. Algae acquire vitamin B12 through a symbiotic relationship with bacteria. Nature 438:90–93. doi: 10.1038/nature04056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Luo H, Moran MA. 2014. Evolutionary ecology of the marine Roseobacter clade. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:573–587. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Preussger D, Giri S, Muhsal LK, Oña L, Kost C. 2020. Reciprocal fitness feedbacks promote the evolution of mutualistic cooperation. Curr Biol 30:3580–3590.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oña L, Kost C. 2020. Cooperation increases robustness to ecological disturbance in microbial cross-feeding networks. bioRxiv 2020.05.15.098103. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.15.098103v1. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Janzen DH. 1985. On ecological fitting. Oikos 45:308–310. doi: 10.2307/3565565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Durham BP, Sharma S, Luo H, Smith CB, Amin SA, Bender SJ, Dearth SP, Mooy BASV, Campagna SR, Kujawinski EB, Armbrust EV, Moran MA. 2015. Cryptic carbon and sulfur cycling between surface ocean plankton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:453–457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413137112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Durham BP, Dearth SP, Sharma S, Amin SA, Smith CB, Campagna SR, Armbrust EV, Moran MA. 2017. Recognition cascade and metabolite transfer in a marine bacteria-phytoplankton model system. Environ Microbiol 19:3500–3513. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Landa M, Burns AS, Durham BP, Esson K, Nowinski B, Sharma S, Vorobev A, Nielsen T, Kiene RP, Moran MA. 2019. Sulfur metabolites that facilitate oceanic phytoplankton-bacteria carbon flux. ISME J 13:2536–2550. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0455-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Amin SA, Hmelo LR, van Tol HM, Durham BP, Carlson LT, Heal KR, Morales RL, Berthiaume CT, Parker MS, Djunaedi B, Ingalls AE, Parsek MR, Moran MA, Armbrust EV. 2015. Interaction and signalling between a cosmopolitan phytoplankton and associated bacteria. Nature 522:98–101. doi: 10.1038/nature14488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seymour JR, Amin SA, Raina J-B, Stocker R. 2017. Zooming in on the phycosphere: the ecological interface for phytoplankton–bacteria relationships. Nat Microbiol 2:17065. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Durham BP, Boysen AK, Carlson LT, Groussman RD, Heal KR, Cain KR, Morales RL, Coesel SN, Morris RM, Ingalls AE, Armbrust EV. 2019. Sulfonate-based networks between eukaryotic phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria in the surface ocean. Nat Microbiol 4:1706–1715. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0507-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Boysen AK, Carlson LT, Durham BP, Groussman RD, Aylward FO, Ribalet F, Heal KR, White AE, DeLong EF, Armbrust EV, Ingalls AE. 2021. Particulate metabolites and transcripts reflect diel oscillations of microbial activity in the surface ocean. mSystems 6:e00896-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00896-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Seyedsayamdost MR, Case RJ, Kolter R, Clardy J. 2011. The Jekyll-and-Hyde chemistry of Phaeobacter gallaeciensis. Nat Chem 3:331–335. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pomeroy LR. 1974. The ocean’s food web, a changing paradigm. Bioscience 24:499–504. doi: 10.2307/1296885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Heal KR, Durham BP, Boysen AK, Carlson LT, Qin W, Ribalet F, White AE, Bundy RM, Armbrust EV, Ingalls AE. 2021. Marine community metabolomes carry fingerprints of phytoplankton community composition. mSystems 6:e01334-20. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.01334-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fu H, Uchimiya M, Gore J, Moran MA. 2020. Ecological drivers of bacterial community assembly in synthetic phycospheres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:3656–3662. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917265117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ferrer-González FX, Widner B, Holderman NR, Glushka J, Edison AS, Kujawinski EB, Moran MA. 2021. Resource partitioning of phytoplankton metabolites that support bacterial heterotrophy. ISME J 15:762–773. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00811-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Tol HM, Armbrust EV. 2021. Genome-scale metabolic model of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana highlights the importance of nitrogen and sulfur metabolism in redox balance. PLoS One 16:e0241960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stuart RK, Pederson ERA, Weyman PD, Weber PK, Rassmussen U, Dupont CL. 2020. Bidirectional C and N transfer and a potential role for sulfur in an epiphytic diazotrophic mutualism. ISME J 14:3068–3078. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00738-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]