Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Jan 7;10(1):e01086-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01086-20

Draft Genome Sequences of Eight Campylobacter volucris Isolates from Freshwater Sources in Victoria, Australia

Agnus M Davis a, David T McCarthy a, Dieter M Bulach b, Rebekah Henry a,
Editor: Julia A Marescac
PMCID: PMC8407693  PMID: 33414293

Campylobacter spp. can survive and be transmitted from a range of environments. Here, we examine eight draft genome sequences of Campylobacter volucris, identified as part of an examination of waterborne Campylobacter species. This is the first report of environmental survival of C. volucris outside gull species.

ABSTRACT

Campylobacter spp. can survive and be transmitted from a range of environments. Here, we examine eight draft genome sequences of Campylobacter volucris, identified as part of an examination of waterborne Campylobacter species. This is the first report of environmental survival of C. volucris outside gull species.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Campylobacter-associated infection is often spread to humans via consumption of poultry, beef, lamb, or pork products (1). However, there are increasing reports of environmental pathways (water, soil) to disease transmission (25). Campylobacter species can be introduced into these environments through direct defecation by zoonotic disease vectors (e.g., birds, dogs, livestock). For example, sampling of the cloaca of black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus) in Sweden revealed carriage of a Campylobacter lari-like strain (6). Further DNA analysis identified the bacterium to be a distinct Campylobacter species, Campylobacter volucris. To date, C. volucris has been minimally reported within the literature, with eight published genome sequences primarily associated with black-headed gulls (7).

In this study, waterborne strains were isolated from five freshwater locations across Greater Melbourne (Table 1). The samples underwent membrane filtration onto 0.45-μm cellulose nitrate filters (Sartorius, Germany). Isolation was undertaken as described in Australian/New Zealand standard 4276.19:2001 (AS/NZS, 2001), with membranes placed into 25 ml Preston broth and resuscitated aerobically for 2 h at 37°C, prior to the addition of Campylobacter selective supplement (Oxoid, UK) and microaerobic incubation (5% O2, 10% CO2, and 85% N2) for 48 h at 42°C. Postenrichment (48 h at 42°C), 2 μl of each sample was plated onto modified charcoal-cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (CCDA)-Preston medium and incubated for 48 h at 42°C (Oxoid). The colonies underwent biochemical confirmation using the Oxoid Biochemical Identification System (OBIS) Campy kit, followed by selection on horse blood agar (HBA) (Oxoid) and microaerophilic growth for 48 h at 42°C.

TABLE 1.

Australian Campylobacter volucris isolation, sequencing, and genome assembly data

Parameter Data for strain:
MON0058 MON0078 MON0115 MON0166 MON0180 MON1184 MON1267 MON2072
Sequencing technology Illumina NextSeq 500 Illumina NextSeq 500 Illumina NextSeq 500 Illumina NextSeq 500 Illumina NextSeq 500 Illumina NextSeq 500 Illumina NextSeq 500 MGITech DNBSEQ-G400
Library chemistry Nextera XT Nextera XT Nextera XT Nextera XT Nextera XT Nextera XT Nextera XT MGIEasy DNA FS
Sequencing chemistry NextSeq 500 v2 NextSeq 500 v2 NextSeq 500 v2 NextSeq 500 v2 NextSeq 500 v2 NextSeq 500 v2 NextSeq 500 v2 DNBSEQ high-throughput sequencing set FCL
Read length (bp) PE150 PE75 PE150 PE75 PE75 PE150 PE150 PE100
No. of reads 2,404,222 3,743,990 913,212 3,969,814 3,316,282 1,203,542 1,195,848 5,627,484
No. of contigs 36 292 61 281 340 28 64 27
Genome length (bp) 1,486,257 1,467,362 1,508,747 1,548,798 1,413,139 1,497,020 1,637,888 1,519,422
N50 (bp) 83,244 9,015 66,645 11,468 6,494 109,393 73,782 128,448
Coverage (×) 220 174 83 184 147 112 113 364
GC content (%) 30.3 33.4 30.8 33.6 32.7 30.7 30.3 28.8
SRA accession no. SRX9038520 SRX9038521 SRX9038522 SRX9038523 SRX9038524 SRX9038525 SRX9038526 SRX9038527
BioSample accession no. SAMN15944590 SAMN15944591 SAMN15944592 SAMN15944593 SAMN15944594 SAMN15944595 SAMN15944596 SAMN15944597
BioProject accession no. PRJNA660282 PRJNA660282 PRJNA660282 PRJNA660282 PRJNA660282 PRJNA660282 PRJNA660282 PRJNA660282
Source Rural river Rural river Rural river Rural river Rural river Rural river Rural river Urban river
GPS location 37°42′25.1″S, 145°19′19.5″E 37°42′25.1″S, 145°19′19.5″E 37°42′25.1″S, 145°19′19.5″E 37°40′25.3″S, 145°29′20.1″E 37°42′25.1″S, 145°19′19.5″E 37°45′17.7″S, 145°40′46.8″E 37°45′17.7″S, 145°40′46.8″E 37°47′38.2″S, 145°00′06.8″E

Genomic DNA was extracted using the RBC genomic DNA extraction kit (Real Biotech, Taiwan). The DNA quality and quantity were assessed using a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing libraries were prepared using 1 ng DNA for the Nextera XT kit (Illumina, USA) and 100 ng DNA for the MGIEasy DNA FS kit (MGI, China). Sequencing of the Nextera XT libraries was conducted on the NextSeq 500 platform (Illumina) using v2 2 × 150-bp paired-end (PE) chemistry, while the MGI libraries underwent sequencing on an MGITech DNBSEQ-G400 (MGI) instrument using the 150PE DNBSEQ high-throughput sequencing set FCL v2 chemistry (MGI). Sequence data were quality processed, analyzed, and de novo assembled using the tools within the Nullarbor v2.0 pipeline (8). Default parameters were applied to all software contained therein unless otherwise specified.

The draft genome sequence and assembly statistics are provided in Table 1. De novo assembly achieved an overall coverage of 135× (±43×), with the strains having an average GC content of 31% (±2%) and size of 1.5 Mb (±62 kb). These characteristics are similar to those previously reported for C. volucris isolates.

This study reports the draft genome sequence for eight C. volucris isolates from waterways in Victoria, Australia; this is the first non-host-associated isolation of this species. Thus, this report extends our understanding of the genetic diversity within the species and is the first demonstration that this organism has the capacity to exist in environmental waters. We also note that black-headed gulls are not part of the indigenous fauna of the region, indicating a broader avian host range, possibility associated with other waterfowl species.

Data availability.

The genome sequences and raw data have been deposited in GenBank within BioProject accession number PRJNA660282, under the accession numbers outlined in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the funding and data contribution from Melbourne Water and the Australian Research Council (LP160100408). We also acknowledge use of the services and facilities of Micromon Genomics at Monash University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Varrone L, Stafford RJ, Lilly K, Selvey L, Glass K, Ford L, Bulach D, Kirk MD, The CampySource Project Team . 2018. Investigating locally relevant risk factors for Campylobacter infection in Australia: protocol for a case–control study and genomic analysis. BMJ Open 8:e026630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shrestha RD, Midwinter AC, Marshall JC, Collins-Emerson JM, Pleydell EJ, French NP. 2019. Campylobacter jejuni strains associated with wild birds and those causing human disease in six high-use recreational waterways in New Zealand. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01228-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01228-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nilsson A, Johansson C, Skarp A, Kaden R, Bertilsson S, Rautelin H. 2018. Survival of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli water isolates in lake and well water. APMIS 126:762–770. doi: 10.1111/apm.12879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gibney KB, O'Toole J, Sinclair M, Leder K. 2017. Burden of disease attributed to waterborne transmission of selected enteric pathogens, Australia, 2010. Am J Trop Med Hyg 96:1400–1403. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mughini-Gras L, Penny C, Ragimbeau C, Schets FM, Blaak H, Duim B, Wagenaar JA, de Boer A, Cauchie H-M, Mossong J, van Pelt W. 2016. Quantifying potential sources of surface water contamination with Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Water Res 101:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Debruyne L, Broman T, Bergstrom S, Olsen B, On SLW, Vandamme P. 2010. Campylobacter volucris sp. nov., isolated from black-headed gulls (Larus ridibundus). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:1870–1875. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.013748-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kweon OJ, Lim YK, Yoo B, Kim HR, Kim T-H, Lee M-K. 2015. First case report of Campylobacter volucris bacteremia in an immunocompromised patient. J Clin Microbiol 53:1976–1978. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00442-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Seemann T, Goncalves da Silva A, Bulach DM, Schultz MB, Kwong JC, Howden BP. 2018. Nullarbor. https://github.com/tseemann/nullarbor.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequences and raw data have been deposited in GenBank within BioProject accession number PRJNA660282, under the accession numbers outlined in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES