Mycobacterium smegmatis, an acid-fast bacterial species in the phylum Actinobacteria, has often been used as a substitute for pathogenic mycobacteria in research. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of two M. smegmatis bacteriophages, Penelope2018 and Miniwave.
ABSTRACT
Mycobacterium smegmatis, an acid-fast bacterial species in the phylum Actinobacteria, has often been used as a substitute for pathogenic mycobacteria in research. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of two M. smegmatis bacteriophages, Penelope2018 and Miniwave.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Mycobacterium is a genus of bacteria that contains the human pathogens M. tuberculosis and M. abscessus. With the evolution of multidrug-resistant mycobacteria, bacteriophages represent an alternative form of infection treatment (1). Using the nonpathogenic bacterial host M. smegmatis as a tool for phage discovery, a greater understanding of mycobacteriophage genome evolution can potentially broaden the implementation of phage therapies.
Mycobacteriophages Penelope2018 and Miniwave were directly isolated from untreated surface soil using the actinobacterial host M. smegmatis mc2155. Plaque purification, amplification, and creation of high-titer lysates were done using methods described in the Phage Discovery Guide (https://seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home) (2). DNA was purified using the Promega Wizard DNA cleanup kit, and sequencing libraries were built using the Ultra II FS kit with dual-indexed barcoding (New England Biolabs). Libraries were then pooled and run on an Illumina MiSeq instrument to yield single-end 150-base reads. Genome quality assessment and assembly were completed using AceUtil and Newbler v.2.9 and checked for completeness, accuracy, and genomic termini using Consed v.29 (3) with default parameters as previously described (4) (https://github.com/SEA-PHAGES/phageAssembler). The genomes were manually annotated on PECAAN (5) and DNAMaster v.5.0.2 (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/computer.htm) using Glimmer v.3.02 (6), GeneMark v.2.8 (7), and Starterator (https://github.com/SEA-PHAGES/starterator) to determine start sites. ARAGORN v.1.1 and tRNAscan v.2.0 were used to detect tRNA (8, 9). Putative functions were determined using BLASTp on the NCBI nonredundant (nr) and actinobacteriophage databases (E value of <10e−7 or less), as well as HHPRED (probability value of >90%) (10–12). Genome and phage features can be found in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Mycobacteriophage genome details
Phage name | GenBank accession no. | SRA accession no. | Genome length (bp) | G+C content (%) | No. of CDSa | Collection site location | Plaque and TEM images available at: |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Penelope2018 | MN119378 | SRX9125697 | 64,544 | 59.7 | 88 | 41.2295 N, 73.9871 W | https://phagesdb.org/phages/Penelope2018 |
Miniwave | MT952854 | SRX9537687 | 74,961 | 63 | 139 | 41.2295 N, 73.9871 W | https://phagesdb.org/phages/Miniwave |
CDS, coding DNA sequences.
Penelope2018 plaques are not turbid. Sequencing produced 686,783 individual reads with approximately 1,509-fold shotgun coverage. The genome displays 99% nucleotide similarity to BigMama, as determined by a BLASTn search on the NCBI nr database. Penelope2018 contains a circularly permuted genome of 64,544 bp and a G+C content of 59.7%. Annotation revealed 88 open reading frames (ORFs), 23 of which have predicted functions, only 3 of which are coded on the reverse strand. These features are characteristic of phages in the D1 subcluster (13), which contains 19 sequenced mycobacterial phages in the SEA-PHAGES collection (11).
Miniwave plaques are turbid, indicating that the phage is temperate. Sequencing produced 795,539 individual reads with approximately 152-fold shotgun coverage. This genome displays 99% nucleotide similarity to Paperbeatsrock, as determined by a BLASTn search on the NCBI nr database. It has a genome of 64,544 bp and a G+C content of 63% with 3′ sticky 10-bp overhang genomic ends. Miniwave has 139 ORFs, 43 of which have predicted functions and no predicted tRNAs. These characteristics are expected of phages in the E cluster (14), which contains 106 sequenced mycobacterial phages in the SEA-PHAGES collection, with no identified subclusters (11).
Phage particles were freshly prepared from a high-titer lysate for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Particles were negatively stained with 2% (wt/vol) aqueous uranyl acetate (pH 4.5) on carbon-coated grids and examined at an accelerating voltage of 100 kV (images available on phagesdb.org). Both Miniwave and Penelope2018 are siphoviruses, which agrees with other mycobacterial phages in the D1 and E clusters.
Data availability.
The genome sequences reported here have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers in Table 1 (BioProject PRJNA488469). The SRA numbers are provided in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Dextra Baldwin McGonagle Foundation and Dominican College Science Department for funding this research. We also thank members of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute SEA-PHAGES program for their technical support during the sequencing and annotation of this genome and related training, specifically Graham Hatfull, Welkin Pope, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Daniel Russell, and Rebecca Garlena.
The Dominican College SEA-PHAGES annotators were Naomi Abzun, Romina Aguila, Cherlina Bisono, Mailey Casimir, Danaya Clark, Bethzabeth Concepcion, Marzena Czymczuk, Tania Dasilva, Joseph DeRosa, Denzel Edwards, Mariah Feliciano, Tema Frees, Eliana Gonzalez, Louis Levine, Isha Mbaye, Sarah McDonagh, Eithan Mcenulty, Nikita Patel, Dorinda Sam, Lauren Shields, Jonathan Simon, Sarah Smith, and Elizabeth Tolkan.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dedrick RM, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Garlena RA, Russell DA, Ford K, Harris K, Gilmour KC, Soothill J, Jacobs-Sera D, Schooley RT, Hatfull GF, Spencer H. 2019. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Med 25:730–733. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SCR, Findley AM, Gissendanner CR, Golebiewska UP, Guild N, Hartzog GA, Grillo WH, Hollowell GP, Hughes LE, Johnson A, King RA, Lewis LO, Li W, Rosenzweig F, Rubin MR, Saha MS, Sandoz J, Shaffer CD, Taylor B, Temple L, Vazquez E, Ware VC, Barker LP, Bradley KW, Jacobs-Sera D, Pope WH, Russell DA, Cresawn SG, Lopatto D, Bailey CP, Hatfull GF. 2014. A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01051-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 8:195–202. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. Methods Mol Biol 1681:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rinehart CA, Gaffney BL, Smith JR, Wood JD. 2016. PECAAN: Phage Evidence Collection and Annotation Network user guide. Western Kentucky University Bioinformatics and Information Science Center, Bowling Green, KY. https://pecaan.kbrinsgd.org/. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. GeneMark: Web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–W454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hatfull GF, Jacobs-Sera D, Lawrence JG, Pope WH, Russell DA, Ko CC, Weber RJ, Patel MC, Germane KL, Edgar RH, Hoyte NN, Bowman CA, Tantoco AT, Paladin EC, Myers MS, Smith AL, Grace MS, Pham TT, O'Brien MB, Vogelsberger AM, Hryckowian AJ, Wynalek JL, Donis-Keller H, Bogel MW, Peebles CL, Cresawn SG, Hendrix RW. 2010. Comparative genomic analysis of 60 Mycobacteriophage genomes: genome clustering, gene acquisition, and gene size. J Mol Biol 397:119–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hatfull GF. 2014. Molecular genetics of mycobacteriophages, p 81–119. InHatfull GH, Jacobs WR, Molecular genetics of mycobacteria. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequences reported here have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers in Table 1 (BioProject PRJNA488469). The SRA numbers are provided in Table 1.