Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Jan 21;10(3):e01194-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01194-20

Draft Genome Sequence of the Type Strain Lysobacter capsici VKM B-2533

Sergey V Tarlachkov a, Irina V Kudryakova a, Alexey S Afoshin a, Maria N Tutukina b,c, Elena A Leontyevskaya a, Natalia V Vasilyeva a,
Editor: David Raskod
PMCID: PMC8407771  PMID: 33478995

Lysobacter capsici VKM B-2533T is a promising strain for isolation of new lytic agents. Here, we report a draft genome sequence of this strain, consisting of 131 scaffolds with a total length of 6,196,943 bp. The results obtained will enable us to find and study biologically active compounds important for biomedicine.

ABSTRACT

Lysobacter capsici VKM B-2533T is a promising strain for isolation of new lytic agents. Here, we report a draft genome sequence of this strain, consisting of 131 scaffolds with a total length of 6,196,943 bp. The results obtained will aid in the discovery and study of biologically active compounds important for biomedicine.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacteria of the genus Lysobacter are unique producers of various lytic agents (bacteriolytic enzymes, antibiotics, and peptides) (17). In this regard, Lysobacter spp. are of great interest for biomedicine and agriculture. Lysobacter capsici VKM B-2533T (=KCTC 22007T = DSM 19286T) was isolated from the rhizosphere of pepper at the Gyeongsang National University (Jinju, South Korea) in 2008 (8). This strain was shown to have potent antifungal and antibacterial effects (79). An antifungal effect against Phytophthora infestans was observed in volatile organic compounds found in the strain (10). Bacteriolytic enzymes were also purified, among them β-lytic protease, which demonstrated potent antistaphylococcal activity (7). Here, we report a draft genome sequence of L. capsici VKM B-2533T.

L. capsici VKM B-2533T was obtained from the All-Russian Collection of Microorganisms (VKM). The strain was cultivated in KSP medium (11) at 29°С with aeration for 18 h. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA minikit (catalog no. 51304) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed by the Genomics Core Facility at the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology. A short-read library was prepared with the NEBNext Ultra II kit (New England Biolabs, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The library was sequenced on the NextSeq 500 platform (Illumina, USA).

Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise noted. The quality of the reads was checked with FastQC v0.11.8 (12). Adapter sequences and low-quality regions in raw reads were removed with Trimmomatic v0.39 (13) using the following options: ILLUMINACLIP:TruSeq3-PE-2.fa:2:30:10; SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15; and MINLEN:55. Clean reads after trimming were assembled using SPAdes v3.14.1 (14) with the following options: --cov-cutoff, auto; and --careful. The obtained scaffolds were manually checked using Tablet v1.17.08.17 (15) to remove artifacts. Genome coverage was assessed with QUAST v5.1.0rc1 (16). The annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v4.13 (17).

A total of 13,667,678 paired-end reads with a length of 76 bp were obtained from the sequencing. As a result, 13,154,612 clean reads with an average length of 75.6 bp were assembled into 131 scaffolds with 159-fold coverage. The scaffold N50 value is 92,182 bp, and the largest scaffold is 402,011 bp. The genome assembly size is 6,196,943 bp with an average G+C content of 66.9%. A total of 5,078 protein-coding genes (1,250 of which are coding hypothetical proteins), 50 tRNAs, 3 rRNAs, and 4 noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) were predicted.

The genomic sequence of L. capsici VKM B-2533T obtained in this work opens up new perspectives for discovering novel lytic agents and studying the mechanisms of their synthesis and regulation.

Data availability.

The raw reads have been deposited in the NCBI SRA under the accession no. SRR12790239, and the whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. JACXXL000000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, JACXXL010000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-74-00086).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Stepnaya OA, Ledova LA, Kulaev IS. 1999. Bacteriolytic enzymes. Usp Biol Khim 39:327–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vasilyeva NV, Shishkova NA, Marinin LI, Ledova LA, Tsfasman IM, Muranova TA, Stepnaya OA, Kulaev IS. 2014. Lytic peptidase L5 of Lysobacter sp. XL1 with broad antimicrobial spectrum. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 24:59–66. doi: 10.1159/000356838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xie Y, Wright S, Shen Y, Du L. 2012. Bioactive natural products from Lysobacter. Nat Prod Rep 29:1277–1287. doi: 10.1039/c2np20064c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jaswal SS, Fuhrmann CN, Ota N, Rader SD, Agard DA. 2013. α-Lytic protease, p 2558–2565. InRawlings ND, Salvesen GS (ed), Handbook of proteolytic enzymes, 3rd ed. Academic Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Panthee S, Hamamoto H, Paudel A, Sekimizu K. 2016. Lysobacter species: a potential source of novel antibiotics. Arch Microbiol 198:839–845. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1278-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Puopolo G, Tomada S, Pertot I. 2018. The impact of the omics era on the knowledge and use of Lysobacter species to control phytopathogenic micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol 124:15–27. doi: 10.1111/jam.13607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Afoshin AS, Kudryakova IV, Borovikova AO, Suzina NE, Toropygin IY, Shishkova NA, Vasilyeva NV. 2020. Lytic potential of Lysobacter capsici VKM B-2533T: bacteriolytic enzymes and outer membrane vesicles. Sci Rep 10:9944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67122-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Park JH, Kim R, Aslam Z, Jeon CO, Chung YR. 2008. Lysobacter capsici sp. nov., with antimicrobial activity, isolated from the rhizosphere of pepper, and emended description of the genus Lysobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:387–392. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65290-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gómez Expósito R, Postma J, Raaijmakers JM, De Bruijn I. 2015. Diversity and activity of Lysobacter species from disease suppressive soils. Front Microbiol 6:1243. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lazazzara V, Perazzolli M, Pertot I, Biasioli F, Puopolo G, Cappellin L. 2017. Growth media affect the volatilome and antimicrobial activity against Phytophthora infestans in four Lysobacter type strains. Microbiol Res 201:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ogura J, Toyoda A, Kurosawa T, Chong AL, Chohnan S, Masaki T. 2006. Purification, characterization, and gene analysis of cellulase (Cel8A) from Lysobacter sp. IB-9374. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 70:2420–2428. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 13.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Milne I, Stephen G, Bayer M, Cock PJA, Pritchard L, Cardle L, Shaw PD, Marshall D. 2013. Using Tablet for visual exploration of second-generation sequencing data. Brief Bioinform 14:193–202. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw reads have been deposited in the NCBI SRA under the accession no. SRR12790239, and the whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. JACXXL000000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, JACXXL010000000.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES