Skip to main content
Aging and Disease logoLink to Aging and Disease
. 2021 Sep 1;12(6):1363–1375. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0908

Proteomic Profiling of Extracellular Vesicles Separated from Plasma of Former National Football League Players at Risk for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy

Satoshi Muraoka 1, Annina M DeLeo 1, Zijian Yang 2, Harutsugu Tatebe 3, Kayo Yukawa-Takamatsu 1, Seiko Ikezu 1, Takahiko Tokuda 3, David Issadore 2, Robert A Stern 4,5,6, Tsuneya Ikezu 1,4,6,*
PMCID: PMC8407879  PMID: 34527415

Abstract

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) is a tauopathy that affects individuals with a history of exposure to repetitive head impacts, including National Football League (NFL) players. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are known to carry tau in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. We examined protein profiles of EVs separated from the plasma of former NFL players at risk for CTE. EVs were separated from the plasma from former NFL players and age-matched controls using size-exclusion chromatography. Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis identified 675 proteins in plasma EVs, and 17 proteins were significantly differentially expressed between former NFL players and controls. Total tau (t-tau) and tau phosphorylated at threonie181 (p-tau181) in plasma-derived EVs were measured by ultrasensitive immunoassay. Level of t-tau and p-tau181 in EVs were significantly different, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of t-tau and p-tau181 showed 0.736 and 0.715, respectively. Machine learning analysis indicated that a combination of collagen type VI alpha 3 and 1 chain (COL6A3 and COL6A1) and reelin (RELN) can distinguish former NFL players from controls with 85% accuracy (AUC = 0.85). Based on the plasma EV proteomics, these data provide protein profiling of plasma EVs for CTE, and indicate combination of COL6A3, RELN and COL6A1 in plasma EVs may serve as the potential diagnostic biomarkers for CTE.

Keywords: chronic traumatic encephalopathy, extracellular vesicles, machine learning, plasma, proteome


Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative tauopathy that is associated with exposure to repetitive head impacts such as those sustained by contact or collision sport athletes, including boxers and American tackle football, soccer, rugby, and ice hockey players [1]. CTE is characterized by neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) composed of perivascular neuronal or astrocytic deposition of phosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau (p-tau). In later stages, the p-tau depositions become widespread and lead to neuronal loss and neurodegeneration [1-3]. Recently, it has been reported that the conformation of tau filaments in CTE is distinct from other tauopathies such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [4-6]. The β-helix of tau filaments in CTE have differently conformation from tau filaments of Alzheimer’s disease and creates a hydrophobic cavity. The differently cavity from Alzheimer’s disease may contribute the progression of CTE [4]. At this time, CTE can only be diagnosed by neuropathologic examination. However, a recent study provided preliminary support for the use of the positron emission tomography (PET) p-tau ligand flortaucipir to detect CTE in living former national football league (NFL) players [7]. PET imaging for routine diagnostic or screening purposes is, however, limited due to its expense and lack of availability. On the other hand, accessible fluid biomarkers could be more useful for the detection and diagnosis of CTE in those at presumed risk through prior repetitive head impact exposure. Several fluid biomarkers, including the measurement of total tau (t-tau), p-tau and β-amyloid (Aβ) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or plasma, have shown promise in the diagnosis and early detection of AD [8-11]. In initial studies of CSF and plasma levels of tau in the detection of CTE, however, there were no significant differences found between former NFL players and controls in t-tau and p-tau levels [11,12].

Extracellular vesicles (EV), including exosomes (50-150nm), ectosomes/microvesicles (150-1000nm) and apoptotic bodies (1000-5000nm) are released into the extracellular space by almost all cell types in the central nervous system (CNS), including neurons and glia [13-15]. These vesicles are found in saliva, Urine, blood and CSF [16-19]. Such vesicles contain many types of nucleic acids, lipids, and proteins that can be transferred to recipient cells as a form of cell-to-cell communication [20,21]. In the CNS, it has been reported that AD-associated pathogenic proteins, including tau and Aβ oligomers, are present in brain EVs and play important roles in AD pathogenesis [22-24]. Models of neuron-to-neuron transfer of tau seeds by EVs have been reported in AD [23,25]. A recent study reported that the Bridging Integrator 1 (BIN1) protein, which is associated with the progression of tau pathology, may alter tau clearance by promoting the release of tau-enriched microglial EVs [26].

Although morphological, proteomic, or RNA analyses were previously performed with EVs extracted from plasma or serum samples from patients with neurodegenerative diseases [27-29], no quantitative proteomics database have yet been established for former NFL players at risk for CTE. Herein, we provide the first proteomic profiling of EVs separated from former NFL players’ plasma samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample selection, blood sampling, and clinical measures

The plasma samples were obtained from the National Institutes of Health-funded study, “Diagnosing and Evaluating Traumatic Encephalopathy using Clinical Tests” (DETECT) at Boston University School of Medicine. Participants included in the current study were 30 former NFL players with cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and a control group of 25 asymptomatic age-matched men without a history of contact/collision sports or traumatic brain history. The DETECT study procedures have been described elsewhere [10-12]. The selection of participants for the current study from the larger DETECT Study cohort was based on availability of an adequate number of plasma aliquots for EV separation remaining in the study freezer at the time of this study. At the time of participation, non-fasting blood samples were collected into plastic dipotassium EDTA tubes and processed according to standard procedures. Plasma was aliquoted and frozen at -80ºC [30]. All participants were administered a neuropsychological test battery that assessed the major cognitive domains (i.e., attention, executive function, verbal and visual episodic memory, language, visuospatial function) and standardized interview-based and self-report measures of mood and behavior. Neuropsychological test raw scores were transformed to standard scores corrected for age, gender, and/or education using published normative data. Principal component analysis was performed to generate four clinical factor composite scores: Behavioral/Mood, Psychomotor Speed/Executive Function, Verbal Memory, and Visual Memory. These clinical factor scores were included in the present study [31]. A list of the tests and details of the factor score generation are described in Alosco et al [32]. The Institutional Review Board at Boston University Medical Campus approved the protocol and all participants provided informed consent (Institutional Review Board (IRB); H-32363).

Separation of EVs from human plasma samples

The EV fraction was separated from the plasma samples using qEV original columns (#qEVoriginal-5 Pack IZON Science, MA, USA). Briefly, 500μL of plasma was centrifuged at 1,500× g for 10 min at 4°C, then the supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min at 4°C. The EV fraction was separated from the supernatant using the qEV columns and then eluted with 500μL of double-filtered PBS (dfPBS, with 0.22-μm pore-size [#SLGP033RS EMD Millipore, USA]). Particles and protein concentrations were determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis and bicinchoninic acid assay, respectively.

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)

All samples were diluted in dfPBS at least 1:10 to obtain particles within the target reading range of Nanosight 300 (Malvern Panalytical Inc., UK) and sCMOS camera:10-100 particles per frame. Using a stage pump system, four 30-second videos were taken for each sample at 21°C and set screen gain to 1.0 and adjust the camera level unit the particle in the screen can be clearly seen. Analysis of particle counts was carried out in the Nanosight NTA 3.2 software (Malvern Panalytical Inc., UK) with a detection threshold of 5.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

The EV separated from former NFL player and control plasma were analyzed by TEM. EV fractions were subjected to electron microscopy as described [33]. Briefly, 5μL of EV samples were adsorbed for 1 minute to a carbon-coated grid that has been made hydrophilic by a 30-s exposure to a glow discharge. Excess liquid was removed with a filter paper (Whatman no. 1), and samples were stained with 0.75 % uranyl formate for 30 s. After excess uranyl formate was removed with a filter paper, grids were examined in a TecnaiG2 Spirit BioTWIN (FEI), and images were recorded with an AMT 2k CCD camera. (AMT, Woburn, MA).

Assessment of protein concentration

The bicinchoninic acid assay (#23225 Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to determine protein concentration for each sample. EVs were lysed with TET buffer (50mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) for 15 min on ice before loading into the assay. All assays were allowed to incubate at 60°C for 30 min before protein concentration was read in a Biotek SynergyMix at 562 nm.

MASS SPECTROMETRY

SDS-PAGE and in-gel digestion

Proteomics analysis used the high purity EV fraction which was identified by NTA and protein concentration. Ice-cold 100% (w/v) acetone (#179124 Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to the high purity EV fraction (qEV fraction #8 or #9) to a final concentration of 20% of acetone, then the mixed sample was incubated for 16hrs at -20°C and was centrifuged at 20,000× g for 15 min at 4°C. The pellet was then washed once with 80% ice-cold acetone. After drying, the pellet was resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer (#1610747 Bio-Rad, USA). Subsequently, the samples were run in a 10% gel (#456-1033 Bio-Rad, USA) until the dye front was 10 mm from the top of the gel. The gels were washed twice with distilled water, fixed with fixation buffer (50% methanol, 10% acetic acid and 40% H2O), and stained with 0.1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 Dye (#20278 Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) in 10% acetic acid, 50% methanol and 40% H2O for 16 h, and destained with destaining buffer (10% acetic acid, 50% methanol and 40% H2O) by soaking the gel for at least 2 h with at least two replacements of fresh solvent. Each lane was then individually removed from the gel and subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion after reduction with dithiothreitol and alkylation with iodoacetamide at Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of Massachusetts Medical School. Peptides eluted from the gel were lyophilized and re-suspended in 25µL of 5% acetonitrile (0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid). A 2-µL injection was loaded by a Waters NanoAcquity Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography in 5% acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) at 4.0 µL/min for 4 min onto a 100-µm I.D. fused-silica pre-column packed with 2 cm of 5 µm (200Å) Magic C18AQ (Bruker-Michrom Inc., MA, USA). Peptides were eluted at 300nL/min from a 75-µm I.D. gravity-pulled analytical column packed with 25 cm of 3 µm (100Å) Magic C18AQ particles using a linear gradient from 5-35% of mobile phase B (acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid) in mobile phase A (water + 0.1% formic acid) over 60 min. Ions were introduced by positive electrospray ionization via liquid junction at 1.4kV into a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive hybrid mass spectrometer. Mass spectra were acquired over m/z 300-1750 at 70,000 resolution (m/z 200) with an AGC target of 1e6, and data-dependent acquisition selected the top 10 most abundant precursor ions for tandem mass spectrometry by higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation using an isolation width of 1.6 Da, max fill time of 110 ms, and AGC target of 1e5. Peptides were fragmented by a normalized collisional energy of 27, and fragment spectra acquired at a resolution of 17,500 (m/z 200).

Mass-spectrometry data analysis

Raw data files were peak processed with Proteome Discoverer (version 1.4, Thermo Scientific, USA) followed by identification using Mascot Server (version 2.5, Matrix Science, UK) against the Homo sapiens (Swiss-Prot) FASTA file (downloaded 10/2018). Search parameters included Trypsin/P specificity, up to 2 missed cleavages, a fixed modification of carbamidomethyl cysteine, and variable modifications of oxidized methionine, pyroglutamic acid for Q, and N-terminal acetylation. Assignments were made using a 10ppm mass tolerance for the precursor and 0.05 Da mass tolerance for the fragments. All non-filtered search results were processed by Scaffold (version 4.4.4, Proteome Software, Inc., USA) utilizing the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (Institute for Systems Biology, WA, USA) with threshold values set at 86% for peptides (1.0% false-discovery rate [FDR]) and 90% for proteins (2 peptide minimum, 0.2% FDR), and quantitative comparisons made using the iBAQ-quantitation method with all samples normalized by total ion current for the run [34].

Measurement of total tau (t-tau) and tau phosphorylated on threonine 181 (p-tau181)

The qEV fractions #7 and #8 were pooled, and 200μL of the pooled EVs was added to 5 volumes of ice cold 100% acetone to precipitate EV proteins. After a 16 h incubation at -20°C, the sample was spun at 20,000× g for 15 min at 4°C, and the pellet was dried up. The pellet was lysed with M-PER® Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (#78503 Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with Halt™ Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (#78442 Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) by vortexing for 15min. The EV t-tau and p-tau181 were measured using the modified Human Total Tau Simoa kit (Quanterix, Lexington, MA) on the Simoa HD-1 analyzer (Quanterix). Briefly, this kit is an updated version of the Simoa assay. It uses a monoclonal capture antibody that reacts with an epitope in the mid-region of all tau isoforms in combination with a detection antibody that reacts with an epitope at the N-terminus of t-tau for t-tau immunoassay or in paired helical filament (PHF)-tau (AT270, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for p-tau181 immunoassay. The standards of t-tau or p-tau181 were adapted from Human Tau ELISA™ kit or Human Tau [pT181] phosphoELISA™ ELISA kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for each assay, respectively [35]. All plasma-derived EV samples were diluted 4x with the Tau 2.0 Sample Diluent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) prior to the assays, to minimize matrix effects, and were analyzed in duplicate on one occasion. The relative concentration estimates of t-tau and p-tau181 were calculated according to the standard curve.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS software ver.25 and GraphPad Prism8 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). Data were analyzed by t-test or, when appropriate, a nonparametric Mann-Whitney t-test. Group comparisons of age, body mass index (BMI), duration of football play, years in NFL, and the four clinical factor scores were performed using independent t-tests. The Gene Ontology of identified proteins were elucidated by the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 [36,37]. The Venn diagram and heatmap analysis were generated using Venny_2.1 (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/) and ClustVis (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/).

Machine Learning Analysis

An ensemble machine learning classifier to evaluate the performance of the selected proteins was developed [24,38]. The ensemble machine learning classifier consists of three individual machine learning algorithms to mitigate overfitting, including Linear Discriminant Analysis, Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine [38,39]. Model’s performance generated by the machine learning was evaluated on a separate, user-blinded test set (n = 26).

RESULTS

Participants

Plasma samples were available for 26 participants, including 14 symptomatic former NFL players (mean age: 56.7 years, range 46-67) and 12 asymptomatic controls (mean age: 55.1, range 48-65) for proteomics, and 27 symptomatic former NFL players (mean age: 56.6, range 40-68) and 25 asymptomatic controls (mean age: 57.0, range 45-68) for ultrasensitive immunoassay for t-tau and p-tau (Table 1). There was statistical difference in body mass index (BMI) between former NFL players and control groups but no outlier was detected for BMI in the two groups as determined by Outlier Identifier with ROUT (Q = 1%) (Prism 8, GraphPad).

Table 1.

Patient information.

Proteomics Control (n=12) Former NFL player (n=14) t-testa p-valueb
Age, mean 55.08 ± 6.42 56.71 ± 7.43 -0.594 0.558
Body Mass Index (BMI), mean 27.58 ± 3.31 33.44 ± 4.60 -3.669 0.001
Duration of football play, mean year - 18.93 ± 4.10 - -
Years in NFL, mean year - 8.64 ± 3.48 - -
Estimated cumulative head impacts in footballc - 20674.06 ± 6990.55 - -
Mood / Behavior, mean -0.821 ± 0.402 0.759 ± 1.048 -4.893 0.00006
Psychomotor speed / Executive Function, mean 0.430 ± 0.635 -0.189 ± 0.751 2.217 0.037
Verbal Memory, mean 0.506 ± 1.232 -0.248 ± 1.122 1.603 0.123
Visual Memory, mean 0.248 ± 0.752 -0.218 ± 0.784 1.515 0.144
Ultrasensitive immunoassay for t-tau and p-tau Control (n=25) Former NFL player (n=27) t-test p-value
Age, mean 57.04 ± 6.63 56.63 ± 7.60 0.207 0.837
Body Mass Index (BMI), mean 27.93 ± 3.77 33.50 ± 4.16 5.038 0.000007
Duration of football play, mean year - 18.96 ± 3.65 - -
Years in NFL, mean year - 8.37 ± 3.00 - -
Estimated cumulative head impacts in footballc - 19730.78 ± 5851.98 - -
Mood / Behavior, mean -0.920 ± 0.443 0.362 ± 0.771 -7.134 0.000000006
Psychomotor speed / Executive Function, mean 0.282 ± 0.650 -0.234 ± 0.728 2.588 0.013
Verbal Memory, mean 0.302 ± 1.193 -0.218 ± 0.788 1.794 0.084
Visual Memory, mean 0.329 ± 0.741 0.214 ± 0.761 0.525 0.602
a

The group comparisons were performed using independent t-test.

b

The statistical significance of the differences were calculated using a two-tailed test.

c

Referred to as the Cumulative Head Impact Index (CHII) [11].

Experimental workflow

The experimental workflow is summarized in Figure 1. The EVs were separated using qEV columns. For proteome profiling, the separated EVs were run in SDS-PAGE for in-gel digestion. The digested peptides were then analyzed by high sensitivity mass spectrometry (see Materials and Methods).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Workflow used in proteomics analysis of former NFL player plasma-derived EVs. EVs were separated from healthy control and former NFL players plasma using qEV original columns. The separated EVs were precipitated by acetone and run on 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The protein bands were cut out of the gel, followed by reduction, alkylation and trypsin digestion. The non-labeled peptides were analyzed by Nano LC-MS/MS on Orbitrap Q Exactive Mass Spectrometer. The raw data files were processed with Proteome Discoverer. Search results were loaded into the Scaffold Viewer to validate and quantify proteins. Biomarker candidate EV proteins for early diagnosis and monitoring of CTE were selected using bioinformatics analysis, and then confirmed the accuracy by Machine Learning algorithm.

Biochemical characteristic of plasma-derived EVs

NTA revealed that the concentrations of particles derived from former NFL players and controls were not significantly different (p = 0.4855). The mode size distribution peaked at 89 nm in former NFL players and at 84 nm in controls (p = 0.9497) (Fig. 2A). In addition, the separated EVs from former NFL player and control plasma were showed classical EV morphology by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Proteomic profiling of former NFL players and controls plasma-derived EVs. (A) Upper panel: Particle numbers of Plasma-derived EV fraction from CTRLs and former NFL players by NTA (p = 0.4855 by Mann-Whitney test). Y-axis, log2 scale. Lower panel: Particle size of Plasma-derived EV fraction (p = 0.9497). (B) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of former NFL player and control plasma-derived EV. Left: Control, Right: former NFL player. Scale bar; 100nm. (C) Venn diagram of the proteins identified in plasma-derived EVs from CTRLs (blue) and former NFL players (red). (D-G) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8. (D) The GO term of Top 5 Cellular Component with -log10(FDR p-value). (E) The GO term of Top 5 Biological Process with -log10(FDR p-value). (F) The GO term of Top 5 Molecular Function with -log10(FDR p-value). (G) The GO term of Top 5 Disease Ontology with -log10(FDR p-value).

Proteomics profiling of former NFL player and control plasma-derived EVs

Across both groups, a total of 675 proteins were identified with at least two unique peptides (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Table 1 and 2). There were 626 proteins identified in the control group EVs and 653 proteins identified in former NFL player group EVs. Among them, 604 proteins were identified in both groups, with 22 proteins unique to the controls and 49 proteins unique to the former NFL players (Fig. 2C). The identified EV proteins were tested for gene ontology by the DAVID (Fig. 2D-G). Across all three groups (controls, former NFL players, and common proteins) the majority of expressed proteins were annotated as being components of the extracellular exosome category, a subset of the ‘cellular component’ ontology (Fig. 2D). Receptor-mediated endocytosis was among the 5 most enriched ‘biological process’ in EVs isolated from plasma of NFL players (Fig. 2E). Collagen and integrin binding activity was enriched in ‘molecular function’ GO terms in NFL players (Fig. 2F). In the ‘disease’ ontology, the molecules unique to former NFL player EVs were enriched in the AD category, but not in the control EVs (Fig. 2G). The EV samples were enriched in EV-specific molecules, such as tetraspanins (CD9 and CD81), annexins, Rab family, and also contain non-EV molecules such as APOA1, APOB and ALB, as listed in MISEV2018 guidelines [40] (Supplementary Table 3). Outlier identifier with “Robust nonlinear regression and Outlier removal method” detected no outlier among tested groups for APOA1 and ALB and one outlier for APOB, demonstrating that there was no obvious outlier in terms of contaminated proteins in these samples.

Table 2.

Up- and down-regulated plasma-derived EV proteins in former NFL players compared with controls.

Uniprot ID Gene Name Control Average Intensitya Former NFL Player Average Intensity log2 (NFL / Control) p.valueb Count
(control)c
Count
(NFL)
P12111 COL6A3 4.73E+05 2.23E+06 2.24 0.0213 7 14
P78509-3 RELN 1.97E+05 8.90E+05 2.18 0.0084 11 13
P12109 COL6A1 5.61E+05 2.35E+06 2.07 0.0062 11 14
Q4LDE5 SVEP1 1.09E+05 4.30E+05 1.97 0.0136 7 12
P04275 VWF 1.19E+07 4.67E+07 1.97 0.0230 12 14
P00915 CA1 9.83E+05 2.72E+06 1.47 0.0079 9 14
P06727 APOA4 1.12E+07 2.64E+07 1.23 0.0131 12 14
P08519 LPA 4.52E+07 1.02E+08 1.17 0.0177 12 14
P05546 SERPIND1 7.41E+05 1.61E+06 1.12 0.0255 10 13
P11142 HSPA8 1.20E+07 6.01E+06 -1.00 0.0197 11 14
P13987 CD59 6.82E+06 3.26E+06 -1.07 0.0416 10 11
P0DMV8-2 HSPA1A 3.89E+06 1.84E+06 -1.08 0.0438 9 13
P06753-5 TPM3 1.78E+07 7.60E+06 -1.23 0.0430 11 14
P13224-2 GP1BB 4.44E+07 1.87E+07 -1.25 0.0271 12 14
P04439 HLA-A 3.06E+07 1.22E+07 -1.33 0.0478 12 14
P61026 RAB10 1.87E+07 5.93E+06 -1.66 0.0344 10 11
O75558 STX11 3.69E+06 1.17E+06 -1.66 0.0457 9 11
a

The value shows iBAQ intensity by Scaffold software.

b

The statistical significance of the differences were calculated using student’s t.test.

c

The count shows identified patient numbers.

Potential of plasma-derived EV proteins as a biomarker for CTE

Label-free quantitative comparisons were performed using the iBAQ-quantification method within the Scaffold software. Figure 3A shows the volcano plot of the 325 common proteins which were detected in more than 50% of the group (NFL players: n > 6 and controls: n > 5). Among these proteins, 9 proteins were significantly up-regulated and 8 proteins were significantly down-regulated in former NFL players compared to the controls (as determined by -log10(p-value) <1.30 and log2 fold-change threshold of >1 or <-1) (Fig. 3A, Supplementary Fig. 1A and Table 2). Figure 3B shows the scatter plot of top 3 proteins (Collagen type VI alpha 3 and 1 chain (COL6A3 and COL6A1), reelin (RELN), which were significantly differentially expressed between NFL players and control groups. We assessed the correlation of these 17 proteins with the clinical factor score by Spearman’s correlation analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1A and B). To determine the combination of the proteins with the highest receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the significantly differentially expressed proteins were analyzed using an ensemble machine learning algorithm. The AUC value for the combination of the top 3 up-regulated molecules (COL6A3, RELN and COL6A1) was significantly higher than the combination of the top 2 up-regulated molecules or using only the single most up-regulated molecule (Fig. 3C and D). The combination of the top 3 up-regulated molecules exhibited 85% accuracy in identifying former NFL players (AUC = 0.85). In confirmation, we ran two control experiments that randomly selected 3 proteins to form the identification panel (repeated 20 times, AUC = 0.45, accuracy = 55%) and shuffling the true labels of the subjects within the training set (AUC = 0.49, accuracy = 48%). Neither approached the level of accuracy of the initial finding (Fig. 3C and D). To characterize the CTE-related proteins in plasma-derived EVs, we measured the concentration of t-tau and p-tau181 in the other cohort by ultrasensitive immunoassay. Both t-tau and p-tau181 were detectable in former NFL players’ plasma-derived EVs, and the levels of each were significantly different (t-tau: p = 0.0022, p-tau181: p = 0.0011, Fig. 4A). ROC curve was performed to assess the biomarker potential of t-tau and p-tau181 in plasma-derived EVs. The t-tau and p-tau181 in plasma-derived EVs showed an AUC of 0.742 and 0.757, respectively (Fig. 4B). We assessed the ROC and AUC value for combination of t-tau or p-tau181 and significantly differentially expressed proteins (Supplementary Table 4). The combinations of t-tau or p-tau181 and CA1 or STX11 were significantly higher than using only the single t-tau or p-tau181 molecule (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Analysis of label-free quantitative proteomics comparison of former NFL players and control plasma-derived EV. (A) Volcano plot showing degree of differential expression of EV proteins in former NFL players compared with CTRLs. The x-axis indicates log2 transformed fold change in expression. The y-axis shows -log10 transformed p-values. The grey dot line shows the 1.3010 -log10(p-value) and 1 or -1 log2(fold change) cutoff. (B) A scatter plot of log2 (intensity) as measured by proteomics per selected candidate protein. (COL6A1: -log10(p-value) = 2.2079, log2(intensity) = 2.07, COL6A3: -log10(p-value) = 1.6715, log2(intensity) = 2.24, RELN: -log10(p-value) = 2.0766, log2(intensity) = 2.18. The t test was calculated by Mann-Whitney test. (C) A ROC of possible pairs of three candidate proteins. Area under ROC for single-marker (COL6A3; Gray line) was 0.74, in multi-marker (COL6A3 and RELN; Orange line) were 0.83 and in multi-marker (COL6A3, RELN and COL6A1; Blue line) were 0.85. (D) The Accuracy for 3 selected using the test set: Accuracy = 85%, AUC = 0.85, Randomly selected control: Accuracy = 55%, AUC = 0.45, Shuffling control: Accuracy = 48%, AUC = 0.49.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Levels of Plasma-derived EV t-tau and p-tau from former NFL players and controls. (A) Total-tau and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) levels in Plasma-derived EVs in the other cohort (former NFL players = 27, CTRL = 25) by ultrasensitive immunoassay. Left: EV t-tau levels (p = 0.0022). Right: EV p-tau181 levels (p = 0.0011). (B) The ROC curves of EV t-tau and p-tau181. Left: EV t-tau ROC curve (AUC = 0.742). Right: EV p-tau181 ROC (AUC = 0.757).

DISCUSSION

EVs separated from plasma of former NFL players with symptoms consistent with CTE and same-age asymptomatic controls underwent label-free quantitative proteomic profiling by Nano LC-MS/MS. We identified 675 proteins across both groups, 17 of which show significant differences in expression between former NFL players and controls. Machine learning analysis revealed that the combination of COL6A3, RELN and COL6A1 proteins distinguished the former NFL players from controls with 85% accuracy. These molecules are associated with severity of neuropsychiatric features, but are not associated with the duration of football. We have also identified 49 unique molecules in the former NFL players, which show unique association with atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, lung cancer, and AD as determined by DAVID GO.

Gene ontology analysis revealed that enrichment of extracellular exosomes between two groups, suggesting that this size-exclusion chromatography method can significantly enrich EVs from plasma sample. Interestingly, disease analysis of the EVs showed NFL players enriched proteins related to AD, which is another tauopathy. Moreover, NFL player plasma EVs were enriched in receptor-mediated endocytosis in biological process, which are integral part of microglial function for the clearance of degenerated neurons and protein accumulations [41].

Accumulating evidence suggests that plasma- or serum-derived EVs may harbor pathogenic proteins or molecular information reflective of a neurodegenerative disorder, and therefore may assess the severity of sports-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and predict progression of CTE. Winston et al has reported that the levels of postsynaptic protein neurogranin in plasma neuron-derived EVs (NDE) and astrocyte- derived EVs (ADE) were significantly lower in mTBI patients and their plasma NDEs cargo protein are toxic to recipient cells [42]. Goetzl et al has described that the level of neurofunctional protein, including annexin VII, UCH-L1, occludin, aquaporin 4 and synaptogyrin-3, in plasma NDE were elevated in the acute mTBI phase but mostly normalized in chronic phase while they observed sustained abnormal increase in pathogenic proteins, such as Aβ42 and p-tau181, in chronic mTBI patients [43]. Our proteomics data was identified only annexin Vll (fold change = 0.71, p-value = 0.5241), but it tends toward decrease in NFL players.

The protein levels of COL6A3, RELN and COL6A1 were significantly increased in the EVs in the plasma of former NFL players. Previous research found that sciatic crush injury increases the expression level of Col6a1, and Col6a1-/- mice show delayed regeneration of sciatic nerve with reduced macrophage recruitment and their polarization towards M2 neurodegenerative phenotype [44], suggesting that M2 macrophage-derived EVs may contribute to NFL players’ plasma EV to some degree. Moreover, our recent study shows white matter rarefaction as a result of repeated head impacts in former NFL players, which may be more relatable to the expression of COL6A3 and COL6A1 rather than the pTau pathology of CTE. Reelin protein has been reported to be up-regulated in the brains of AD patients with advanced Braak stage [45]. In the healthy brain, reelin binds to apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) as an active homodimer and induces phosphorylation of Dab1 [45,46]. The phosphorylated Dab1 prevents tau phosphorylation. In advanced AD, Aβ increases reelin levels and further disrupts active homodimers [45,47-49]. Thus, increased reelin observed in NFL players at risk of CTE may suggest increase in tau phosphorylation due to altered reelin signaling. COL6A1, COL6A3 and reelin are all extracellular matrix proteins and may interact with integrins enriched in EVs. The EV contents of these molecules may be increased in advanced CTE brain in due neurodegeneration, which would release these molecules in part of the cell death. The brain-derived EVs loaded with these molecule may be exported to plasma and detected in our proteomic profiling.

In our previous report that exosomal tau is elevated in former NFL players with risk of CTE, we purified plasma EV by size-exclusion chromatography and detected EV-associated tau using anti-human tau monoclonal antibody and Qdot-655-conjugated secondary antibody [30], which might not detect tau within EVs and was less quantitative. There was also a general concern about the reproducibility of NTA-based detection of florescence-conjugated EVs, which is less sensitive due to the limitation in the laser power for the wide-field fluorescence microscopic imaging. In this study, we isolated plasma EVs using qEV and quantified t-tau and p-tau181 after solubilization of EVs by highly sensitive and quantitative Simoa technology, and confirmed that the level of both t-tau and p-tau181 were significantly increased in former NFL players compared to controls. We have previously found no differences in plasma t-tau levels between the former NFL players and controls [11]. One explanation for this finding is that we used different method for the quantification of the total tau. In the paper of Alosco et al. [11], t-tau was measured with the Simoa HD-1 analyzer (Quanterix) using human Tau kits (101444). In this study, we used modified kit using uses a monoclonal capture antibody that reacts with an epitope in the mid-region of all tau isoforms in combination with a detection antibody that reacts with an epitope at the N-terminus of t-tau for t-tau immunoassay or in paired helical filament-tau (AT270) for p-tau181 immunoassay. Our data indicate that plasma contains N-terminal truncated of tau, which was undetectable by the standard SIMOA Tau kits. Indeed, tau can be cleaved by various proteases, including calpain-1 and 2 at R230, thrombin, cathepsins, asparagine endopeptidase at D255 and N368 [50,51]. This may have resulted in detection of a higher level of t-tau by modified kit over standard kit. The EV tau in plasma may therefore represent a non-invasive biomarker for monitoring the progression of CTE. Importantly, the ROC and AUC value revealed that the AUC of the combinations of COL6A3, RELN, and COL6A1 were significantly higher than AUC of the t-tau or p-tau181 alone.

Across both former NFL players and controls, a total of 675 proteins were identified, with 22 proteins unique to the controls and 49 proteins unique to the former NFL players. Although the proteins that were unique to each group are expected as biomarker candidate molecules, there are several limitations in this study. First, they have only been identified in a small number of former NFL players or control groups. Second, not all former NFL players would be expected to have CTE and those with CTE likely are at different stages of p-tau pathology and neurodegeneration. Third, there is a possibility of other neurodegenerative diseases in both groups, and within the former NFL group, there is a possibility of concurrent proteinopathies with CTE. Fourth, recent studies suggest that outcome of cognitive function with former NFL players may be affected by existing comorbidities such as atherosclerosis, higher BMI, white matter rarefaction or other proteinopathies including Lewy body disease [10,52,53]. Indeed, we observed significant negative correlation between BMI and Psychomotor speed/ Executive Function values when both CTRL and NFL players are combined, although there was no correlation when two groups are separately analyzed, which is a potential confounding factor in this study. Aging is also a confounding factor of psychomotor speed / executive Function [54]. However, there was no correlation between age and Psychomotor speed / Executive Function values in this study. Finally, the candidate proteins may only distinguish former NFL players from controls regardless of the cognitive status. Thus, it is plausible for us to replicate this study with larger samples, controlling for these variables and, ultimately, perform post-mortem validation to determine if these proteins serve as potential biomarkers in former NFL players at risk for CTE.

In summary, this study presents the first proteomic profiles of plasma-derived EVs from symptomatic former NFL players at risk for the neurodegenerative tauopathy, CTE. At this time, CTE is diagnosed through postmortem neuropathological examination. There is a need for relatively non-invasive in vivo biomarkers for the diagnosis and early detection of CTE. Our results suggest that a combination of COL6A1, COL6A3 and RELN molecules in plasma-derived EVs may meet this need. It’s still unclear whether these proteins can be used as brain-derived EVs in plasma as COL6A1 and COL6A3 are commonly expressed in multiple tissues. The combination with cell type-specific molecules from brain cells may serve as more suitable brain-specific biomarkers for CTE. Further investigations are necessary to confirm the utility of this approach, including additional validation sets for monitoring of the disease progression, and to clarify the implications of the correlation of these markers with the disease, as well as to elucidate the mechanisms of EV transport from the brain to plasma.

Supplementary Materials

The Supplemenantry data can be found online at: www.aginganddisease.org/EN/10.14336/AD.2020.0908.

AD-12-6-1363-s.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Ikezu lab members for experimental support, S. W. Hersh for editorial support, M. Ericsson (Electron Microscopy Facility, Harvard Medical School) for electron microscopic imaging services, and J. D. Leszyk, X. Li, and S. Shaffer (Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of Massachusetts Medical School) for the proteomic analysis. This work is in part funded by Aethlon Medical, Inc (TI), Alzheimer’s Association AARF-9550302678 (AMD, SM), DVT-14-320835 (TI), Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (TI), NIH R01 AG066429 (TI), NIH RF1 AG054199 (TI), NIH R56 AG057469 (TI), NIH R21 NS104609 (TI), R01 NS078337 (RAS), U01 NS093334 (RAS), NIH P30 AG0138423 (RAS, SI), NIH R01AG67763 (TI) and AMED 17dk0207042s0101 (TT).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

T.I. has a sponsored research agreement from Aethlon Medical, Inc. for this study.

References

  • [1].McKee AC, Stein TD, Kiernan PT, Alvarez VE (2015). The neuropathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain Pathol, 25:350-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Mez J, Daneshvar DH, Kiernan PT, Abdolmohammadi B, Alvarez VE, Huber BR, et al. (2017). Clinicopathological Evaluation of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Players of American Football. Jama, 318:360-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].McKee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, Stein TD, Alvarez VE, Daneshvar DH, et al. (2013). The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain, 136:43-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Falcon B, Zivanov J, Zhang W, Murzin AG, Garringer HJ, Vidal R, et al. (2019). Novel tau filament fold in chronic traumatic encephalopathy encloses hydrophobic molecules. Nature, 568:420-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Lippens G, Gigant B (2019). Elucidating Tau function and dysfunction in the era of cryo-EM. J Biol Chem, 294:9316-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Cherry JD, Kim SH, Stein TD, Pothast MJ, Nicks R, Meng G, et al. (2020). Evolution of neuronal and glial tau isoforms in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain Pathol, 3:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Stern RA, Adler CH, Chen K, Navitsky M, Luo J, Dodick DW, et al. (2019). Tau Positron-Emission Tomography in Former National Football League Players. N Engl J Med, 380:1716-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Zetterberg H, Burnham SC (2019). Blood-based molecular biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Mol Brain, 12:26-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Cicognola C, Brinkmalm G, Wahlgren J, Portelius E, Gobom J, Cullen NC, et al. (2019). Novel tau fragments in cerebrospinal fluid: relation to tangle pathology and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathologica, 137:279-96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Alosco ML, Tripodis Y, Koerte IK, Jackson JD, Chua AS, Mariani M, et al. (2019). Interactive Effects of Racial Identity and Repetitive Head Impacts on Cognitive Function, Structural MRI-Derived Volumetric Measures, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Tau and Aβ. Front Hum Neurosci, 13:757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Alosco ML, Tripodis Y, Jarnagin J, Baugh CM, Martin B, Chaisson CE, et al. (2017). Repetitive head impact exposure and later-life plasma total tau in former National Football League players. Alzheimers Dement (Amst), 7:33-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Alosco ML, Tripodis Y, Fritts NG, Heslegrave A, Baugh CM, Conneely S, et al. (2018). Cerebrospinal fluid tau, Aβ, and sTREM2 in Former National Football League Players: Modeling the relationship between repetitive head impacts, microglial activation, and neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Dement, 14:1159-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Kowal J, Arras G, Colombo M, Jouve M, Morath JP, Primdal-Bengtson B, et al. (2016). Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USa, 113:E968-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Delpech J-C, Herron S, Botros MB, Ikezu T (2019). Neuroimmune Crosstalk through Extracellular Vesicles in Health and Disease. Trends in Neurosciences, 42:361-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].DeLeo AM, Ikezu T (2018). Extracellular Vesicle Biology in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Tauopathy. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 13:292-308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Simpson RJ, Lim JW, Moritz RL, Mathivanan S (2009). Exosomes: proteomic insights and diagnostic potential, 6:267-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Vella LJ, Greenwood DLV, Cappai R, Scheerlinck J-PY, Hill AF (2008). Enrichment of prion protein in exosomes derived from ovine cerebral spinal fluid. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 124:385-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Muraoka S, Jedrychowski MP, Tatebe H, DeLeo AM, Ikezu S, Tokuda T, et al. (2019). Proteomic Profiling of Extracellular Vesicles Isolated From Cerebrospinal Fluid of Former National Football League Players at Risk for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. Front Neurosci, 13:1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Muraoka S, Lin W, Chen M, Hersh SW, Emili A, Xia W, et al. (2020). Assessment of separation methods for extracellular vesicles from human and mouse brain tissues and human cerebrospinal fluids. Methods, 177:35-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].You Y, Ikezu T (2019). Emerging roles of extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative disorders. Neurobiol Dis, 130:104512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Jayaseelan VP (2019). Emerging role of exosomes as promising diagnostic tool for cancer. Cancer Gene Ther, 144:1941-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Quek C, Hill AF (2017). The role of extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 483:1178-86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Asai H, Ikezu S, Tsunoda S, Medalla M, Luebke J, Haydar T, et al. (2015). Depletion of microglia and inhibition of exosome synthesis halt tau propagation. Nat Neurosci, 18:1584-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Muraoka S, DeLeo AM, Sethi MK, Yukawa-Takamatsu K, Yang Z, Ko J, et al. (2020). Proteomic and biological profiling of extracellular vesicles from Alzheimer's disease human brain tissues. Alzheimers Dement, 16:896-907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Wang Y, Balaji V, Kaniyappan S, Krüger L, Irsen S, Tepper K, et al. (2017). The release and trans-synaptic transmission of Tau via exosomes. Mol Neurodegener, 12:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Crotti A, Sait HR, McAvoy KM, Estrada K, Ergun A, Szak S, et al. (2019). BIN1 favors the spreading of Tau via extracellular vesicles. Sci Rep, 9:9477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Kitamura Y, Kojima M, Kurosawa T, Sasaki R, Ichihara S, Hiraku Y, et al. (2018). Proteomic Profiling of Exosomal Proteins for Blood-based Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease. Neuroscience, 392:121-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Cheng L, Doecke JD, Sharples RA, Villemagne VL, Fowler CJ, Rembach A, et al. (2015). Prognostic serum miRNA biomarkers associated with Alzheimer's disease shows concordance with neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessment. Mol Psychiatry, 20:1188-96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Gámez-Valero A, Campdelacreu J, Reñé R, Beyer K, Borràs FE (2019). Comprehensive proteomic profiling of plasma-derived Extracellular Vesicles from dementia with Lewy Bodies patients. Sci Rep, 9:13282-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Stern RA, Tripodis Y, Baugh CM, Fritts NG, Martin BM, Chaisson C, et al. (2016). Preliminary Study of Plasma Exosomal Tau as a Potential Biomarker for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. J Alzheimers Dis, 51:1099-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Montenigro PH, Corp DT, Stein TD, Cantu RC, Stern RA (2015). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: historical origins and current perspective. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 11:309-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Alosco ML, Jarnagin J, Tripodis Y, Platt M, Martin B, Chaisson CE, et al. (2017). Olfactory Function and Associated Clinical Correlates in Former National Football League Players. J Neurotrauma, 34:772-80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Roccaro AM, Sacco A, Maiso P, Azab AK, Tai Y-T, Reagan M, et al. (2013). BM mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes facilitate multiple myeloma progression. J Clin Invest, 123:1542-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Haraszti RA, Miller R, Dubuke ML, Rockwell HE, Coles AH, Sapp E, et al. (2019). Serum Deprivation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves Exosome Activity and Alters Lipid and Protein Composition. iScience, 16:230-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Tatebe H, Kasai T, Ohmichi T, Kishi Y, Kakeya T, Waragai M, et al. (2017). Quantification of plasma phosphorylated tau to use as a biomarker for brain Alzheimer pathology: pilot case-control studies including patients with Alzheimer's disease and down syndrome. Mol Neurodegener, 12:63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Dennis G, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lane HC, et al. (2003). DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol, 4:P3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2008). Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc, 4:44-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Ko J, Baldassano SN, Loh P-L, Kording K, Litt B, Issadore D (2018). Machine learning to detect signatures of disease in liquid biopsies - a user's guide. Lab Chip, 18:395-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Ko J, Bhagwat N, Yee SS, Ortiz N, Sahmoud A, Black T, et al. (2017). Combining Machine Learning and Nanofluidic Technology To Diagnose Pancreatic Cancer Using Exosomes. ACS Nano, 11:11182-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Thery C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. (2018). Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles, 7:1535750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Leyns CEG, Holtzman DM (2017). Glial contributions to neurodegeneration in tauopathies. Mol Neurodegener, 12:50-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Winston CN, Romero HK, Ellisman M, Nauss S, Julovich DA, Conger T, et al. (2019). Assessing Neuronal and Astrocyte Derived Exosomes From Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury for Markers of Neurodegeneration and Cytotoxic Activity. Front Neurosci, 13:1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Goetzl EJ, Elahi FM, Mustapic M, Kapogiannis D, Pryhoda M, Gilmore A, et al. (2019). Altered levels of plasma neuron-derived exosomes and their cargo proteins characterize acute and chronic mild traumatic brain injury. FASEB J, 33:5082-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Chen P, Cescon M, Zuccolotto G, Nobbio L, Colombelli C, Filaferro M, et al. (2015). Collagen VI regulates peripheral nerve regeneration by modulating macrophage recruitment and polarization. Acta Neuropathologica, 129:97-113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Mata-Balaguer T, Cuchillo-Ibañez I, Calero M, Ferrer I, Sáez-Valero J (2018). Decreased generation of C-terminal fragments of ApoER2 and increased reelin expression in Alzheimer's disease. Faseb J, 32:3536-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Hiesberger T, Trommsdorff M, Howell BW, Goffinet A, Mumby MC, Cooper JA, et al. (1999). Direct binding of Reelin to VLDL receptor and ApoE receptor 2 induces tyrosine phosphorylation of disabled-1 and modulates tau phosphorylation. Neuron, 24:481-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Machado RA, Benjumea-Cuartas V, Zapata Berruecos JF, Agudelo-Flóres PM, Salazar-Peláez LM (2019). Reelin, tau phosphorylation and psychiatric complications in patients with hippocampal sclerosis and structural abnormalities in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav, 96:192-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Botella-López A, Cuchillo-Ibañez I, Cotrufo T, Mok SS, Li Q-X, Barquero M-S, et al. (2010). β-amyloid controls altered Reelin expression and processing in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis, 37:682-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Ohkubo N, Lee Y-D, Morishima A, Terashima T, Kikkawa S, Tohyama M, et al. (2003). Apolipoprotein E and Reelin ligands modulate tau phosphorylation through an apolipoprotein E receptor/disabled-1/glycogen synthase kinase-3beta cascade. FASEB J, 17:295-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Zhang Z, Song M, Liu X, Kang SS, Kwon I-S, Duong DM, et al. (2014). Cleavage of tau by asparagine endopeptidase mediates the neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med, 20:1254-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Kurbatskaya K, Phillips EC, Croft CL, Dentoni G, Hughes MM, Wade MA, et al. (2016). Upregulation of calpain activity precedes tau phosphorylation and loss of synaptic proteins in Alzheimer's disease brain. Acta Neuropathol Commun, 4:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Alosco ML, Stein TD, Tripodis Y, Chua AS, Kowall NW, Huber BR, et al. (2019). Association of White Matter Rarefaction, Arteriolosclerosis, and Tau With Dementia in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. JAMA Neurol, 76:1298-308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Adams JW, Alvarez VE, Mez J, Huber BR, Tripodis Y, Xia W, et al. (2018). Lewy Body Pathology and Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Associated With Contact Sports. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 77:757-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Balter LJT, Higgs S, Aldred S, Bosch JA, Raymond JE (2019). Inflammation Mediates Body Weight and Ageing Effects on Psychomotor Slowing. Sci Rep, 9:15727-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

AD-12-6-1363-s.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Aging and Disease are provided here courtesy of JKL International LLC

RESOURCES