Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Aug 31;11:17697. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97486-y

Author Correction: Validation of the relationship between coagulopathy and localization of hydroxyethyl starch on the vascular endothelium in a rat hemodilution model

Ryu Azumaguchi 1, Yasuyuki Tokinaga 1, Satoshi Kazuma 1,, Motonobu Kimizuka 1, Kosuke Hamada 1, Tomoe Sato 1, Michiaki Yamakage 1
PMCID: PMC8408141  PMID: 34465869

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-021-89889-8, published online 21 May 2021

The original version of this Article contained an error in the legend of Figure 4.

“Quantification of ET and GCX damage markers by ELISA. ET endothelium, GCX glycocalyx, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, TM thrombomodulin, aPC activated protein C, SDC-1 syndecan-1, HSPG heparan sulfate proteoglycan. *P = 0.008 vs no-dilution, **P = 0.003 vs PS, ***P = 0.016 vs no-dilution, ****P = 0.005 vs PS, §P = 0.021 vs no-dilution, P = 0.0009 vs no-dilution 0.018 vs PS, ††P = 0.018 vs PS 0.0009 vs no-dilution, †††P = 0.003 vs no-dilution, ††††P = 0.045 vs PS.”

now reads:

“Quantification of ET and GCX damage markers by ELISA. ET, endothelium; GCX, glycocalyx; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; TM, thrombomodulin; aPC, activated protein C; SDC-1, syndecan-1; HSPG, heparan sulfate proteoglycan. *P = 0.008 vs no-dilution, **P = 0.003 vs PS, ***P = 0.016 vs no-dilution, ****P =0.005 vs PS, §P = 0.021 vs no-dilution, P = 0.0009 vs no-dilution, ††P = 0.018 vs PS, †††P = 0.003 vs no-dilution, ††††P = 0.045 vs PS.”

The original Article has been corrected.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES