Abstract
Background
This multiple-center retrospective study aimed to investigate computed tomography (CT) imaging findings in 72 patients with airway-invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.
Material/Methods
Seventy-two patients with airway-invasive pulmonary aspergillosis confirmed by pathology results were divided into 3 types according to image characteristics. Type I involved the trachea or the main bronchus. Type II involved the lobular and segmental bronchi, which manifested early as bronchial wall thickening, and later development was divided into types IIa and IIb. Type IIa manifested as bronchiectasis, and type IIb manifested as consolidation around the bronchus. Type III involved the bronchioles and pulmonary parenchyma, with tree-in-bud sign and acinar nodules around. CT signs of the various types and their differentiation were investigated.
Results
The main clinical manifestations of the 72 patients with airway-invasive pulmonary aspergillosis were shortness of breath (55/72, 76.4%), cough (40/72, 55.6%), expectoration (35/72, 48.6%), dyspnea (8/72, 11.1%), weight loss (2/72, 2.8%), and fever (30/72, 41.7%). CT typing identified 3 types: 2 patients (2.8%) had type I, presenting as thickening of trachea or main bronchial walls; 3 patients (4.2%) had early type II, manifesting as thickening of lobular or segmental bronchial walls; 27 patients (37.5%) developed type IIa, manifesting as bronchiectasis; 22 patients (30.6%) had type IIb, manifesting as consolidation around the bronchus; and 18 patients (25.0%) had type III, presenting as nodules and patchy shadows with small cavities in the periphery of the lung.
Conclusions
Airway pulmonary aspergillosis has characteristic imaging findings, which can help early clinical diagnosis through classification according to CT imaging characteristics.
Keywords: Classification, Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis, Multidetector Computed Tomography
Background
Aspergillus fungi, which commonly include Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, and Aspergillus terrestris, are ubiquitous in soil, decaying vegetation, and dust [1]. A. fumigatus is the most common type, accounting for about 50% to 60% of cases. Aspergillus spores exist in the air and are small enough to be inhaled through the respiratory tract [2,3]. Inhaled Aspergillus conidia do not pose a risk to the healthy immunocompetent host because the refined machinery of the immune defenses impede development of the fungus [4]. The form that Aspergillus-related lung disease, aspergillosis, takes is heavily dependent on the immune response of the patient [5]. Aspergillus can enter the human body through the respiratory tract, causing respiratory infection, but it can also cause systemic infection when the whole body’s immunity is low.
There are 4 types of aspergillosis: (1) simple aspergilloma; (2) chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, including chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis, chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis, and chronic fibrotic aspergillosis; (3) allergic bronchial pulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA); and (4) invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), which includes angio-invasive aspergillosis and airway-invasive aspergillosis [6].
Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is a severe disease generally observed in immunocompromised patients, such as those with hematological malignancies and neutropenia, bone-marrow transplantation, and solid-organ transplantation, or those undergoing immune suppressive therapy, such as corticosteroid therapy [7]. Airway IPA is a subtype of IPA, and reports on it are limited. Airway-invasive aspergillosis, like the angio-invasive form, occurs in immunocompromised patients [8], but the types have different risk factors. In recent years, with the increase of bronchoscopy, the disease has been gradually recognized and is receiving more clinical attention. In addition to the aging of the population, an increasing number of people have senile diseases, such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which damage the host immune system, and the decline of immune function increases infections with pulmonary aspergillosis, especially airway-invasive aspergillosis [3]. Although airway-invasive aspergillosis is well recognized in the pathologic and clinical literature, it has received little attention in the radiologic literature. There are few articles on the typing of imaging findings of airway-invasive aspergillosis alone. The current medical environment urgently needs a new and more detailed imaging typing system of airway-invasive aspergillosis to guide clinicians and improve the early diagnosis and survival rate.
There are many differences between airway-invasive aspergillosis and angio-invasive aspergillosis, including risk factors, clinical symptoms, and diagnostic methods or imaging [9]. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss them separately. In the past, there were few reports on airway-invasive aspergillosis, which can cause misdiagnosis of the disease. Airway pulmonary aspergillosis is commonly misdiagnosed clinically as a common bacterial infection or tuberculosis, which leads to delays in treatment. In this article, we are the first to propose the classification of airway IPA through imaging. We discuss the imaging manifestations of airway-invasive aspergillosis by subtypes, which can help increase the early diagnosis rate and reduce the misdiagnosis rate. At the same time, the reexamination of CT scans helps us to evaluate the effect of treatment and guide treatment.
Material and Methods
The current study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Nanjing Medical University. We selected 200 patients with pathologically and clinically confirmed pulmonary aspergillosis from 10 hospitals, including the 4 types of aspergilloses: (1) simple aspergilloma; (2) chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; (3) ABPA; and (4) IPA: angio-invasive aspergillosis and airway-invasive aspergillosis. First, we excluded a patient with neutropenia (<500×109/L) that was due to radiotherapy and lung transplantation, which presented as angio-invasive aspergillosis. Second, we excluded cases of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis with a chronic disease course and that conformed to the clinical and imaging of chronic aspergillosis, according to the criteria of the European Cancer/Mycological Research Group [10]. Finally, we further excluded ABPA according to patients’ relevant medical history of asthma, serum IGE examination, imaging findings, blood eosinophil levels, and other factors, which met the consensus [11].
After making the above exclusions, 72 patients with airway-invasive aspergillosis were included in the study. A retrospective analysis was performed on the 72 patients who came from 10 different hospitals from January 2011 to January 2019. The diagnosis of airway-invasive aspergillosis was mainly based on clinical and pathological confirmation after other types of aspergilloses were excluded. Clinical manifestations included cough, expectoration, shortness of breath, dyspnea, weight loss, and fever. Pathological specimens were obtained by bronchoscopy or percutaneous puncture. Aspergillus organisms are characterized by hyphae that have parallel walls, regularly spaced septations, and dichotomously branching hyphae that branch at narrow angles (45°) [12]. When the pathological manifestation met the above criteria, airway-invasive aspergillosis could be diagnosed by combining clinical and imaging data.
The CT equipment used by each of the 10 hospitals was slightly different, resulting in a slight difference in scanning parameters. Although different hospitals had different scanning conditions, each used spiral and thin-layer (thickness of 1 mm) CT scans with more than 64 rows. The images were transmitted and processed by DICOM and analyzed by 3 thoracic radiologists. One of the doctors was an attending doctor who had been engaged in lung imaging research for 8 years, and the other 2 were chief doctors who had worked for more than 10 years. When there was a disagreement, a consultation meeting was held to reach a consensus.
All cases of airway-invasive aspergillosis were divided into 3 types, according to imaging characteristics (Figure 1). Type I referred to disease involving the trachea or the left/right main bronchus, presenting as thickening of the trachea or left/right main bronchial walls. Type II involved the lobular and segmental bronchi manifested as bronchial wall thickening of lobular or segmental bronchial walls. With progression of the disease, type II could develop into type IIa or IIb. Type IIa was characterized by the manifestation of bronchiectasis, while type IIb was characterized by the thickening of the bronchial wall with peripheral consolidation. Type III involved the bronchioles and pulmonary parenchyma with tree-in-bud sign and acinar nodules around, presenting as nodules and patchy shadows with small cavities in the periphery of the lung. Several classifications were not contradictory, as sometimes the types overlapped. In these cases, we chose the type based on the predominant type.
Statistical analysis
Clinical concomitant diseases, risk factors, and clinical symptoms were calculated as percentages. The imaging features were analyzed using percentage statistics.
Results
Among the 72 patients with airway IPA, there were 51 men and 21 women, aged from 22 to 88 years, with an average age of 57.97±13.73. COPD was found in 24 patients (33.3%), diabetes in 16 patients (22.2%), previous influenza infection in 6 patients (8.3%), “other” in 8 patients (including hematological diseases without chemotherapy, occupational disease history, connective tissue disease with use of hormone therapy, renal insufficiency treated by hemodialysis, HIV infection, and bronchial dysplasia), COPD complicated by diabetes in 3 patients (4.2%), COPD complicated by connective tissue disease in 1 patient (1.4%), and unknown causes in 14 patients (19.4%). Table 1 shows the history of each type of airway-invasive aspergillosis. The main clinical manifestations of the patients were shortness of breath (55/72, 76.4%), cough (40/72, 55.6%), expectoration (35/72, 48.6%), dyspnea (8/72, 11.1%), weight loss (2/72, 2.8%), and fever (30/72, 41.7%). Shortness of breath was the most typical symptom.
Table 1.
Type I (2 patients) | Type II (52 patients) | Type III (18 patients) | Total (72 patients) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early II (3 patients) | IIa (27 patients) | IIb (22 patients) | ||||
COPD | 1 (33.3%) | 5 (18.5%) | 8 (36.4%) | 10 (55.6%) | 24 (33.3%) | |
Diabetes | 1 (50%) | 6 (22.2%) | 8 (36.4%) | 1 (5.6%) | 16 (22.2%) | |
Post-influenza | 3 (11.1%) | 2 (9.1%) | 1 (5.6%) | 6 (8.3%) | ||
Other | 1 (50%) | 3 (11.1%) | 3 (13.6%) | 1 (5.6%) | 8 (11.1%) | |
COPD with diabetes | 1 (3.7%) | 2 (11.1%) | 3 (4.2%) | |||
COPD with CTD | 1 (33.3%) | 1 (1.4%) | ||||
Unknown reason | 1 (33.3%) | 9 (33.3%) | 1 (4.5%) | 3 (16.7%) | 14 (19.4%) |
COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CTD – connective tissue disease.
The images were typed into 3 types according to the different manifestations of airway-invasive aspergillosis identified on the CT scans (Figure 1).
Type I (2 patients, 2.8%) (Figure 2) presented as thickening of the trachea or left/right main bronchial walls. The accompanying signs included mediastinum involvement, such as mediastinal emphysema, obstructive atelectasis, tree-in-bud sign, and mucus plug in the bronchi.
Type II involved the lobular and segmental bronchi, which manifested as bronchial wall thickening in the early stage (3 patients, 4.2%). The patients’ CT images showed diffuse thickening of the lobular and segmental bronchus accompanied by peribronchial ground-glass opacities or tree-in-bud signs and acinar nodules at the distal end of the bronchus. If not detected and treated in the early stage, the lesions continued to infiltrate around the bronchus, manifesting as types IIa or IIb. Bronchiectasis was the most typical manifestation of type IIa (27 patients, 37.5%) (Figures 3, 4). The wall of the bronchus was thickened, but peripheral consolidation was not obvious. After treatment, the dilated bronchus gradually recovered and partly returned to normal. Type IIb in 22 patients (30.6%) manifested as thickening of the bronchial wall with surrounding tissue consolidation (Figure 5). The peribronchial consolidation was predominant in the development, but bronchiectasis was not obvious. The accompanying signs included tree-in-bud sign, acinar nodules, ground-glass opacity, and reversed halo sign, a special sign showing as a central ground-glass opacity surrounded by a more or less complete ring of consolidation on CT. The reversed halo sign might be found in this type, and in the late stage, it would develop to encompass the cavity.
Type III involved the bronchioles and pulmonary parenchyma (18 patients, 25.0%) (Figure 6). The bronchial wall was slightly thickened, and there were tree-in-bud signs and acinar nodules in the periphery. With the development of the disease, consolidation and ground-glass opacities formed by the fusion of multiple nodules, which were mainly distributed subpleurally, with tree-in-bud signs and acinar nodules. Also, multiple punctate necrosis and small cavities could be seen in the consolidation. Table 2 shows the imaging features of airway IPA. Although Figures 4 and 6 seem to be similar on the surface, with both showing low-density shadows, they are completely different. Figure 4 shows bronchiectasis, which belongs to type IIA, while Figure 6 demonstrates lesions within the cavity. It is not difficult to distinguish between these 2 types through continuous layer observation or multi-planar reconstruction.
Table 2.
Type I (2 patients) | Type II (52 patients) | Type III (18 patients) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early II (3 patients) | IIa (27 patients) | IIb (22 patients) | |||
Bronchial wall thickening | 2 (100.0%) | 3 (100.0%) | 26 (96.3%) | 22 (100.0%) | 18 (100.0%) |
Tree-in-bud sign | 2 (66.7%) | 25 (92.6%) | 21 (95.5%) | 18 (100.0%) | |
Bronchiectasis | 27 (100.0%) | 1 (4.5%) | |||
Lung consolidation | 2 (100.0%) | 27 (100.0%) | 22 (100.0%) | 18 (100.0%) | |
Ground-glass opacity | 27 (100.0%) | 22 (100.0%) | 18 (100.0%) | ||
Acinar Nodules | 21 (77.8%) | 21 (95.5%) | 18 (100.0%) | ||
Punctiform voids | 13 (48.1%) | 17 (77.3%) | 14 (77.8%) | ||
Big hole | 5 (22.7%) | 4 (22.2%) | |||
Liquid level | 3 (11.1%) | 2 (9.1%) | |||
Reverse halo sign | 5 (22.7%) | ||||
Lymph nodes | 1 (50.0%) | 7 (31.8%) | |||
Pleural effusion | 2 (9.1%) | ||||
Bronchial mucus plug | 1 (50.0%) | ||||
Mediastinum | 2 (100.0%) | ||||
Fistula | 1 (50.0%) |
Discussion
Of the 72 patients included in this study, 33.3% of patients had COPD, 22.2% had diabetes, and 8.3% had previous influenza infection. Our results were consistent with other studies reporting that COPD, diabetes, and previous influenza infection were most common risk factors in patients [13,14], but they were inconsistent with other reports [15–18] in which most of the risk factors summarized in the reports were neutrophil deficiency, blood disease, AIDS, chemotherapy, and organ transplantation; however, the reports did not distinguish between angio-invasive and airway-invasive aspergillosis. In addition, most of our patient cases were provided by the respiratory departments of the hospitals, which excluded angio-IPA in patients with particle deficiency; therefore, most patient risk factors in our research were COPD, diabetes, and previous influenza infection. In recent years, many reports have identified COPD as an underlying disease related to IPA [19]. The susceptibility of patients with COPD to invasive fungal infections can be due to ciliated dysfunction of airway epithelial cells. The long-term use of corticosteroids inhibits the function of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics exposes the body to certain fungal pathogens, and lung disease leads to changes in lung structure and malnutrition [20]. In addition, in some patients with COPD, abnormalities or defects in surfactant proteins, alveolar macrophages, and Toll-like receptors play an important role [21]. Huang et al reported that patients with COPD had a sufficient number of neutrophils compared with patients with neutrophil deficiency, and that their lung damage was mainly due to host overreaction rather than direct invasion by fungi [22]. Previously, diabetes was rarely associated with IPA, and only a few patients were reported [23,24]. These patients have more serious clinical manifestations and are prone to treatment failure, recurrence, and even death [25]. Most patients with subacute or chronic pulmonary aspergillosis have been thought to have potential diabetes; therefore, diabetes was considered to be an important risk factor for pulmonary aspergillosis [20,26]. Patientswith diabetes often have weight loss and decreased albumin levels, leading to malnutrition and decreased immunity and increasing the chance of Aspergillus infection; however, the relationship between diabetes and IPA remains controversial [27]. The pathogenesis of invasive aspergillosis in the context of an influenza infection may be due to the local and systemic effects of the virus. The evolution of influenza strains can cause severe diffuse damage to the respiratory mucosa, interfering with normal mucociliary clearance, and thereby providing a pathway for Aspergillus infection and leading to fungal invasion [28,29]. The treatment of severe pneumonia with steroids can cause immunosuppressive effects, which are associated with invasive fungal infections. Influenza can also impair the local phagocytic function of alveolar macrophages through cytokine imbalance, reducing natural killer cell function, and other immune responses. In addition, treatment in the intensive care unit can increase the susceptibility to secondary aspergillosis.
In the present study, the main clinical manifestations of the patients were shortness of breath, cough, expectoration, dyspnea, weight loss, and fever. Shortness of breath was the most common symptom (76.4%), which was generally consistent with the previous reports [16,18,30,31]. The symptom of shortness of breath can be associated with Aspergillus sensitization by a mechanism similar to that of ABPA. The pathogenesis involved a Th2-dependent acidophilic response to Aspergillus antigen, which is a complex hypersensitivity reaction, leads to sustained antigen supply, eosinophilic infiltration, excessive mucus secretion, and abnormal cilium function and finally results in impaired bronchial walls [30,32].
The clinical classification of aspergillosis includes 4 types: simple aspergilloma, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, ABPA, and IPA. IPA as the most serious type with high mortality includes angio-invasive aspergillosis and airway-invasive aspergillosis. The 2 have significant differences in risk factors, clinical manifestations, imaging features, and prognosis. The clinical literature is increasingly concerned with the airway invasion of Aspergillus. However, few imaging studies focused on airway-invasive aspergillosis. CT examination is of great significance for the diagnosis of airway-invasive aspergillosis, but its imaging manifestations are complex and various. Therefore, it is necessary to type it carefully for the purpose of early diagnosis.
Type I referred to lesions mainly invading the trachea and the main bronchus, and might have also involved the distal end, showing that the wall of the trachea and the main bronchus were thickened. This type was rare, accounting for 2.8% of cases, suggesting that it is mainly related to the clearance function of atmospheric duct cilia and the defense function of inflammatory cells, and fungi do not easily invade there. Due to the small number of cases of this type, its image characteristics need to be summarized in further research with a larger sample size. Type I sometimes needs to be distinguished from ABPA and bronchial tuberculosis. ABPA bronchiectasis is more obvious, there are more mucus plugs, the density is higher, and the outer wall of the bronchus is clear, and the extramural invasion is milder, but the most important difference is that the clinical manifestations are different and that ABPA has specific diagnostic criteria. The outer wall of the bronchial tuberculosis is clear. The adjacent fat space is relatively clear. The bronchial wall is irregularly thickened and the inner edge and thickness of the lumen are uneven. Other lesions in the lung can be accompanied by calcification and tree-in-bud sign, and ground-glass opacity is rare. Type I aspergillosis is rare; therefore, imaging diagnosis should be prudent, and the most important examination is bronchoscopy.
Type II mainly involved the lobular and segmental bronchi. In the early stage of type II, only the lobular and segmental bronchial wall was thickened, and it was difficult to consider early diagnosis. In the late stage of follow-up, type IIa and type IIb were found. Both types mainly involved lobular and segmental bronchi; type IIa was associated with obvious bronchiectasis, and type IIb infiltrated along the periphery of the bronchus without obvious bronchiectasis. These 2 types were most common, accounting for 37.5% and 30.6% respectively. Identifying these 2 types helped us diagnose the disease early. The specificity of this type of image is high, and the differential diagnosis is relatively easy to perform. Organizing pneumonia, lymphoma, and bacterial infections, such as Staphylococcus aureus, can all develop bronchiectasis; however, aspergillosis can be accompanied by a tree-in-bud sign, which means that the lesion is the source of the airway, rather than the surrounding interstitium [33]. This is different from organizing pneumonia. Vasculitis and sarcoidosis bronchi generally do not expand, so it is not difficult to differentiate. The pathogenesis of bronchiectasis is not fully known yet, and the literature has been postulated as follows [32]. The disorder of mucociliary clearance might promote persistent infections of bacteria and fungi, which may increase the risk of viral infection. In susceptible individuals, Aspergillus proteases in normal (or asthmatic/COPD) airways can also lead to bronchiectasis by increasing mucus secretion and driving the Th2 phenotype.
Type III involved the bronchioles and pulmonary parenchyma, pathological changes in the terminal bronchus, image findings of mainly tree-in-bud signs, and image findings of respiratory bronchus as acinar nodules. Along with the surrounding lung tissue invasion, type III can include fused pieces of ground-glass opacities and consolidation and easily formed cavities because of the necrosis of the lung tissue caused by aspergillosis [14]. Type III was also very common, accounting for 25.0% of cases. In the early stage of type III airway-invasive aspergillosis, the acinar nodules need to be differentiated from those of blood-disseminated S. aureus. The former is relatively small, easy to gather and fuse, and can have small inner cavities with an unsmooth inner wall. The latter is distributed randomly, different in size, and usually bigger than the acinar nodule, having a large cavity with a smooth inner wall and possibly having a liquid level. However, with the progression of the lesion, diffuse consolidation can be found in the lung, which is difficult to distinguish on the image.
Thickening of the trachea/main bronchial wall was the most important feature of type I, which was different from the other types. Thickening of lobular/segmental bronchial walls and bronchiectasis were the most characteristic imaging findings of type II, which could be distinguished from the other types. Tree-in-bud sign and acinar nodules were the most characteristic imaging findings of type III. In summary, the large airways have strong defense capabilities, and it is difficult for Aspergillus to invade the trachea and main bronchus after being inhaled through the airway. Therefore, type I airway-invasive aspergillosis was rare. When the trachea/main bronchial wall was thickened, we could diagnose type I. The thickening of the lobular/segmental bronchial wall, bronchiectasis, and consolidation along the peribronchial area were the most important characteristics of type II because Aspergillus has inflammatory infiltration along the bronchus, and bronchiectasis occurred in some cases due to Aspergillus sensitization. When Aspergillus mainly invades bronchioles and pulmonary parenchyma, acinar nodules and tree-in-bud signs easily form, which shows that Aspergillus has invaded the alveoli, respiratory bronchioles, and terminal bronchi. Small necrotic cavities in the lung parenchyma are important characteristics of type III as well. Of course, these types were not contradictory or isolated, and there were overlaps among the different types. When there was overlap, we chose the predominant type.
Imaging manifestations can sometimes explain clinical symptoms. For example, imaging manifestations were mainly bronchial wall thickening, and the clinical symptoms were mainly shortness of breath, rather than sputum expectoration (involving the lung parenchyma). As the image spread to the lung parenchyma and formed consolidation in the lung, the clinical symptoms were aggravated and sputum expectoration and even fever could appear. When necrosis and voids formed, symptoms of hemoptysis could also appear. At the same time, the different types suggested that the method for obtaining pathological specimens in the clinic was also different. For example, type I and type II lesions were mainly obtained by bronchoscopy, while type III lesions were mainly located in the periphery of the lung, and pathological specimens were mainly obtained by puncture. Therefore, typing is not only helpful for early diagnosis of imaging, but also helps to indicate the method of obtaining pathological specimens. In addition, airway-invasive aspergillosis should be differentiated from angio-invasive aspergillosis, and imaging manifestations have a certain value for the identification of both. Angio-invasive aspergillosis mainly manifests as subpleural nodules with a clear boundary and central cavity. Generally, the trachea and bronchi are not invaded, so the walls of the trachea and bronchi are not thickened.
In summary, various imaging manifestations such as bronchial wall thickening, tree-in-bud signs, and acinar nodules represent the bronchial invasion after the inhalation of Aspergillus by the airway, and then the interstitial invasion in the lung and surrounding area, followed by hemorrhagic consolidation, ground-glass opacity, and cavities formed after necrosis [32]. In addition, fungi are easy to discharge with sputum in the larger trachea and main bronchi; therefore, type I airway-invasive aspergillosis findings were rare. The airway invasion in most patients was mainly in the lobar, segmental, and subsegmental bronchi and more distal bronchioli, which was related to the resistance and virulence of the patients. Type II was characterized by location in the lobar, segmental, and subsegmental bronchi and mainly manifested by the thickening of the bronchial wall; type III was located in the bronchioli and mainly manifested by tree-in-bud signs and acinar nodules. In addition to the virulence of the fungus itself and the body’s inflammatory response, the fungus can also cause an allergic reaction, similar to that in ABPA. This type of bronchiectasis is a special manifestation of type IIa, but unlike ABPA, this type of bronchiectasis is not only an allergic reaction but also an invasion of the bronchial wall and surrounding lung tissue. It is presumed that the resistance of type IIa is superior to the virulence of fungi; therefore, allergy is predominant, and necrosis is relatively light. In contrast, types IIb and III are more likely to have a necrotic cavity and pulmonary infiltration. Briefly, owing to those differences in the resistance of the organism and the resistance of Aspergillus, there are different imaging manifestations.
There are several limitations of this paper. First, only CT findings and types of airway-invasive aspergillosis were analyzed, and there was no control group, especially important for angio-invasive aspergillosis. Second, the sample volume was insufficient, and because airway aspergillosis is rare, there were few patients with type I, which is less common than other types of aspergilloses. In a future study, we will collect more cases and use the classification method in this paper to compare angio-invasive aspergillosis with airway-invasive aspergillosis to observe whether the imaging diagnosis is consistent with the clinical diagnosis. Finally, certain errors may have occurred because airway-invasive aspergillosis is rare, the data we collected came from different hospitals, and the hospitals used different equipment.
In this study, we discussed the imaging manifestations of airway-invasive aspergillosis by subtypes. The subtypes were mainly divided according to the location of the lesions involving the bronchus. Type I referred to the lesions mainly invading the trachea and main bronchus, which was the least common type, with bronchial walls having uniform thickening. Type II referred to lesions mainly involving the lobular and segmental bronchi. In the early stage, the bronchus wall was thickened, and in the later period, it could infiltrate the surrounding lung tissue or appear as bronchiectasis. Type III mainly involved the bronchioles and pulmonary parenchyma, with tree-in-bud signs and acinar nodules in the periphery. With the development of the disease, consolidation and ground-glass opacity, with multiple punctate necrosis and small cavities could be found.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the most important risk factors of airway-invasive aspergillosis are COPD, diabetes, and previous influenza infection. These diseases can lead to the decrease of immunity in varying degrees, thus increasing the infection rate and incidence of aspergillosis. Although the clinical manifestations varied, shortness of breath was most common. The CT appearance of airway-invasive aspergillosis was divided into 3 types according to the location of the bronchus involved and the imaging findings, including distribution, bronchial wall thickening, bronchiectasis, consolidation around the bronchus, peripheral alveolar nodules, consolidation, and cavities. Combining risk factors with clinical symptoms can help increase the early diagnosis rate, reduce the misdiagnosis rate, and assess the progress of the disease. Also, repeat CT scanning can help to evaluate the therapeutic effect and guide treatment.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Declaration of Figures Authenticity
All figures submitted have been created by the authors who confirm that the images are original with no duplication and have not been previously published in whole or in part.
Financial support: This work was supported by the 14th “Six Talent Peaks” Project of Jiangsu Province (no. YY-079)
References
- 1.Panse P, Smith M, Cummings K, et al. The many faces of pulmonary aspergillosis: Imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiol Infect Dis. 2016;3(4):192–200. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Krenke R, Grabczak EM. Tracheobronchial manifestations of Aspergillus infections. Sci World J. 2011;11:2310–29. doi: 10.1100/2011/865239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu XY, Sun HM, Zhao BL, Shi Y. Diagnosis of airway-invasive pulmonary aspergillosis by tree-in-bud sign in an immunocompetent patient: Case report and literature review. J Mycol Med. 2013;23(1):64–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2012.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chotirmall SH, Martin-Gomez MT. Aspergillus species in bronchiectasis: Challenges in the cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis airways. Mycopathologia. 2018;183(1):45–59. doi: 10.1007/s11046-017-0143-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buckingham SJ, Hansell DM. Aspergillus in the lung: Diverse and coincident forms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(8):1786–800. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1813-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Davda S, Kowa XY, Aziz Z, et al. The development of pulmonary aspergillosis and its histologic, clinical, and radiologic manifestations. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(11):913–21. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ohta H, Yamazaki S, Miura Y, et al. Invasive tracheobronchial aspergillosis progressing from bronchial to diffuse lung parenchymal lesions. Respirol Case Rep. 2016;4(1):32–34. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Logan PM, Primack SL, Miller RR, Muller NL. Invasive aspergillosis of the airways: Radiographic, CT, and pathologic findings. Radiology. 1994;193(2):383–88. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Henzler C, Henzler T, Buchheidt D, et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced pulmonary computed tomography angiography for the detection of angioinvasive pulmonary Aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04470-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21. doi: 10.1086/588660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maturu VN, Agarwal R. Acute invasive pulmonary aspergillosis complicating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: Case report and systematic review. Mycopathologia. 2015;180(3–4):209–15. doi: 10.1007/s11046-015-9907-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roden AC, Schuetz AN. Histopathology of fungal diseases of the lung. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2017;34(6):530–49. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2017.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ader F, Nseir S, Le Berre R, et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An emerging fungal pathogen. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(6):427–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wessolossky M, Welch VL, Sen A, et al. Invasive Aspergillus infections in hospitalized patients with chronic lung disease. Infect Drug Resist. 2013;6:33–39. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S43069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kosmidis C, Denning DW. Republished: The clinical spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1077):403–10. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-206291rep. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Desoubeaux G, Bailly É, Chandenier J. Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: Updates and recommendations. Med Mal Infect. 2014;44(3):89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Park SY, Lim C, Lee S-O, et al. Computed tomography findings in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic transplant recipients and neutropenic patients, and their prognostic value. J Infect. 2011;63(6):447–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tunnicliffe G, Schomberg L, Walsh S, et al. Airway and parenchymal manifestations of pulmonary aspergillosis. Respir Med. 2013;107(8):1113–23. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guinea J, Torres-Narbona M, Gijon P, et al. Pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(7):870–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bao Z, Chen H, Zhou M, et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A case report and review of the literature. Oncotarget. 2017;8(23):38069–74. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kousha M, Tadi R, Soubani AO. Pulmonary aspergillosis: A clinical review. Eur Respir Rev. 2011;20(121):156–74. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00001011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Huang L, He H, Ding Y, et al. Values of radiological examinations for the diagnosis and prognosis of invasive bronchial-pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Clin Respir J. 2018;12(2):499–509. doi: 10.1111/crj.12551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Janes SM, Barker KF, Mak V, Bell D. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in an insulin-dependent diabetic. Respir Med. 1998;92(7):972–75. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90201-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Watanabe N, Saito K, Kiritani A, et al. A case of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis diagnosed by transbronchial lung biopsy during treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis in a type 1 diabetic patient. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(2):274–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sanghani RN, Udwadia ZF. The association of diabetes and tuberculosis: Impact on treatment and post-treatment outcomes. Thorax. 2013;68(3):202–3. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ekwueme C, Otu AA, Chinenye S, et al. Haemoptysis in a female with diabetes mellitus: A unique presentation of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, and Klebsiella peumoniae co-infection. Clin Case Rep. 2016;4(4):432–36. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ghanaat F, Tayek JA. Weight loss and diabetes are new risk factors for the development of invasive aspergillosis infection in non-immunocompromized humans. Clin Pract. 2017;14(5 Spec Iss):296–301. doi: 10.4172/clinical-practice.1000125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Crum-Cianflone NF. Invasive Aspergillosis associated with severe influenza infections. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3(3):ofw171. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vanderbeke L, Spriet I, Breynaert C, et al. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis complicating severe influenza: Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31(6):471–80. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chabi ML, Goracci A, Roche N, et al. Pulmonary aspergillosis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96(5):435–42. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim JH, Lee HL, Kim L, et al. Airway centered invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in an immunocompetent patient: Case report and literature review. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(3):E250–54. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.02.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.De Soyza A, Aliberti S. Bronchiectasis and Aspergillus: How are they linked? Med Mycol. 2017;55(1):69–81. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gadkowski LB, Stout JE. Cavitary pulmonary disease. Clin Microbiol Med. 2008;21(2):305–33. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00060-07. table of contents. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]