Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):e0256968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256968

A harmful religio-cultural practice (Chhaupadi) during menstruation among adolescent girls in Nepal: Prevalence and policies for eradication

Dipendra S Thakuri 1,*, Roshan K Thapa 2, Samikshya Singh 3, Geha N Khanal 4, Resham B Khatri 5,6
Editor: Stefano Federici7
PMCID: PMC8409632  PMID: 34469491

Abstract

Background

Chhaupadi is a deeply rooted tradition and a centuries-old harmful religio-cultural practice. Chhaupadi is common in some parts of Karnali and Sudurpaschim Provinces of western Nepal, where women and girls are considered impure, unclean, and untouchable in the menstrual period or immediately following childbirth. In Chhaupadi practice, women and girls are isolated from a range of daily household chores, social events and forbidden from touching other people and objects. Chhaupadi tradition banishes women and girls into menstruation huts’, or Chhau huts or livestock sheds to live and sleep. These practices are guided by existing harmful beliefs and practices in western Nepal, resulting in poor menstrual hygiene and poor physical and mental health outcomes. This study examined the magnitude of Chhaupadi practice and reviewed the existing policies for Chhaupadi eradication in Nepal.

Methods

We used both quantitative survey and qualitative content analysis of the available policies. First, a quantitative cross-sectional survey assessed the prevalence of Chhaupadi among 221 adolescent girls in Mangalsen Municipality of Achham district. Second, the contents of prevailing policies on Chhaupadi eradication were analysed qualitatively using the policy cube framework.

Results

The current survey revealed that most adolescent girls (84%) practised Chhaupadi in their most recent menstruation. The Chhaupadi practice was high if the girls were aged 15–17 years, born to an illiterate mother, and belonged to a nuclear family. Out of the girls practising Chhaupadi, most (86%) reported social and household activities restrictions. The policy content analysis of identified higher-level policy documents (constitution, acts, and regulations) have provisioned financial resources, ensured independent monitoring mechanisms, and had judiciary remedial measures. However, middle (policies and plans) and lower-level (directives) documents lacked adequate budgetary commitment and independent monitoring mechanisms.

Conclusion

Chhaupadi remains prevalent in western Nepal and has several impacts to the health of adolescent girls. Existing policy mechanisms lack multilevel (individual, family, community, subnational and national) interventions, including financial and monitoring systems for Chhaupadi eradication. Eradicating Chhaupadi practice requires a robust multilevel implementation mechanism at the national and sub-national levels, including adequate financing and accountable systems up to the community level.

Introduction

Menstruation is a normal biological process that indicates girls’ entrance into womanhood [1]. However, despite being a natural phenomenon, it is perceived as a stigma and taboo in many parts of Nepal, considering women and girls impure and untouchable during the menstruation period [2, 3]. Furthermore, most women and girls in western hills (Karnali and Sudurpaschim provinces) are banished outside their homes to a makeshift hut or cowshed during their menstrual period [4]. Those small huts made up of mud and stones without windows and locks are called Chhaupadi huts, and this tradition is called Chhaupadi [5].

Chhaupadi is a centuries-old harmful practice guided by religio-cultural beliefs in western Nepal [2, 4]. The word Chhaupadi is derived from a local Raute dialect in the far-west where "Chhau" means untouchable or unclean, and "Padi" means being or becoming [68]. Thus, Chhaupadi refers to a state of being untouchable/unclean. There are several sociocultural taboos during the menstruation period in the western hills of Nepal [1, 7]. For instance, people believe women are impure, untouchable, and unclean during routine menstrual periods. Those societal beliefs limit women/girls involvement in daily activities, including restrictions in eating (milk and dairy products), touching (men, water sources, livestock, plants, and kitchen items) and visiting public places (water sources, temple, prayer room and cultural ceremonies) [5, 9]. Moreover, women and girls are forced to isolate themselves and sleep inside the menstrual hut or in the cattle sheds where health hygiene is largely compromised. However, the Chhaupadi practice is not limited to menstruation and is common during postpartum [10].

Women and girls face physical and mental hardship while residing in Chhaupadi huts during mensuration [79]. In the past, several Chhaupadi related incidents have been reported from western hills of Nepal, such as sexual abuse, rape, attack from wild animals, snake or scorpion bites, and illness. All of these were related to poor safety and unhygienic conditions [4, 1113]. In addition, poor hygiene and sanitation practices in Chhaupadi are compounded by the unavailability of and poor access to water and sanitation facilities, lack of sanitary napkins, and healthy environmental conditions [4]. The poor state of menstrual hygiene results in adverse health outcomes such as reproductive and genitourinary tract infections, the risk of cervical cancer, anxiety and depression [1416]. Furthermore, in many cases, Chhaupadi practices have resulted in menstruation-related shame, fear and humiliation, poor menstrual hygiene practices, and girls’ school absenteeism in Nepal [1719] and other low and middle-income countries [1, 14, 17].

In Nepal, a high prevalence of Chhaupadi practice is reported in the western region. The multi-indicator cluster survey (MICS) 2019 reported 21.1% of women to practice Chhaupadi in Sudurpaschim province, which is six-fold higher than the national average (3.8%). This finding resonates with other sub-national small sample-sized studies [1, 10]. For instance, the prevalence of Chhaupadi in Achham district in 2011 was 95% among the women [10], while it was 72% among the adolescents’ girls in 2018 [1]. Several sociocultural and religious factors are the major drivers behind it include illiteracy, superstitions, stigma, existing gender-based discrimination, cultural, traditional, and religious beliefs and the poor implementation of laws against Chhaupadi [5]. In addition, Chhaupadi has demonstrated inter-generational practice in Nepal [8], which violates Nepal’s commitment to several national and international conventions to protect women’s reproductive rights and the right to live without discrimination [5].

Many policies have been formulated and implemented targeting the eradication of Chhaupadi in Nepal. For instance, the Constitution of Nepal (2015) ensures the right to equality (Article 18) and the right to reproductive health (Article 38). Likewise, Article 24 (1) and Article 29 (2) affirm that "no one shall be treated with any kinds of untouchability or discrimination and no one shall be exploited based on any custom, tradition, culture, and practices or any other bases" [20]. In May 2005, the Supreme Court outlawed Chhaupadi as malpractice and directed the government to take necessary legal arrangements to eliminate Chhaupadi. In 2008, the Government of Nepal formulated the directives to eliminate the Chhaupadi practice [5]. Thereafter, many awareness-raising programs were focused on community stakeholders, and Chhaupadi sheds demolition drive has been implemented [8], aiming to eradicate Chhaupadi [21]. Recently, the Criminal Code Act (2017) criminalised Chhaupadi and included the provision of a three-month jail sentence and/or Nepalese Rupees (NRs) 3,000 (~USD 26) fine for anyone forcing a woman to follow the custom [22].

Despite Chhaupadi being a widespread harmful religio-cultural practice in western Nepal, limited studies have identified the magnitude of Chhaupadi practice among adolescent girls [1, 23]. Furthermore, there is a lacking systematic mapping of contents in existing legal and policy documents related to Chhaupadi eradication. Chhaupadi is a problem rooted in sociocultural and religious values. Therefore, it is imperative to review the content of existing policies and explore the multiple dimensions of policy loopholes to strengthen their implementation in federalised governance systems of Nepal. The findings can inform policymakers and program managers to design, revise and implement tailored Chhaupadi eradication interventions at the federal, provincial, and community levels.

Methods

We used quantitative and qualitative methods to identify the magnitude of Chhaupadi and to understand the policy landscape on Chhaupadi, respectively [Fig 1]. The purpose of the quantitative survey was to identify the recent extent of the Chhaupadi practice, while the qualitative method was used to complement and expand the scope of the research gaps [24]. Thus, by reviewing a past study [25], we used multiple methods to identify the recent prevalence of Chhaupadi practice and eradication policy initiatives. Second, we conducted a cross-sectional survey using face-to-face interviews among adolescent girls. Third, we revised the content of existing policies with a focus on Chhaupadi eradication. The rationale for using policy cube was to provide a bigger perspective of the problem. Finally, we integrated the quantitative and qualitative methods at the conceptual level. Finally, we discussed the quantitative and qualitative findings to draw the policy/program and research implications.

Fig 1. Flow chart of quantitative and qualitative components of the study.

Fig 1

Quantitative component of the study

Study design, setting and sampling

A cross-sectional study was conducted among adolescent girls aged 11 to 19 years. Interviews were conducted between 15 May and 15 Sep 2017. The adolescence period is the critical stage of habit formation, and the majority of adolescents’ girls experience puberty and the first mensuration in their early adolescence. Moreover, adolescent girls usually follow what parents and society instruct them to do on their health and hygiene, which could shape their behaviour; therefore, we decided to recruit adolescent girls in this study.

As available literature suggests, Chhaupadi is widely prevalent in the Karnali and Sudurpaschim provinces of Nepal [1, 5, 26]. Achham is one of the districts in Sudurpaschim province where many incidents, including deaths in Chhau huts, were reported in media over the last decade [1, 10, 27]. We selected Achham as a study district, which had 11 rural local government units. Mangalsen municipality was purposively selected considering feasibility, time factor, accommodation, and available resources for data collection. According to the National Census of 2011, Mangalsen municipality had 6,604 households with about 32,507 population, of which 8,265 were adolescents [28]. Two wards (wards no 6 and 7) of Mangalsen municipality were randomly selected. The sampling frame was the population of adolescent girls aged 11–19 years. The list of households with adolescent girls was accessed from the respective ward office. There were about 650 adolescent girls aged 11–19 years in study wards.

We calculated the sample size based on the prevalence of Chhaupadi practice (15%) reported in MICS 2014 [26]. We assumed an allowable error of 5% and a non-response rate of 10% for calculating the sample size. We used the formula N = Z2pq/d2 [where Z = 1.96, p = 0.15, q = 0.85), d = 0.05] and sample size was estimated to be 221. We selected 221 households of adolescent girls through a simple random sampling technique (every fourth household). An adjoining household was recruited if a girl was absent in a selected household at the survey time. Additionally, in a case where one household had more than one eligible adolescent girl, the eldest adolescent girl was selected for the interview.

Study variables

The respondents were asked whether they practised Chhaupadi in their most recent menstrual period prior to the survey. This outcome variable had the response of either ’yes’ or ’no’. Explanatory variables were selected based on the review of previous literature [1, 2, 29]; we selected sociodemographic, knowledge and practices related variables. Sociodemographic related characteristics of girls included ethnicity (advantaged: Brahmin and Chhetri, and disadvantaged: Dalits and Janajati) [30], respondent’s age (11–14, 15–17, and 18–19 years), respondent’s education (6–8 grade and 9–12 grade), education of parents (illiterate or no education, basic education (1–8 grade), and secondary (9–10 grade) or above), occupation of mother (unpaid work and paid cash work), occupation of father (job, agriculture, business, and labor work) and the family type (nuclear and joint). At the same time, variables related to knowledge and practice on Chhaupadi included knowing about Chhaupadi (yes, no), factors for Chhaupadi practice (impurity, fear of God, inadequate knowledge, societal fear, and fear of family members falling sick) and the person suggesting staying in Chhaupadi huts (parents, grandparents, and relatives or traditional healers). We further categorised restriction during menstruation: bathing restriction (yes, no), food restriction (yes, no), types of food restriction included (milk and dairy products, vegetable and fruits, and meat and meat products), restriction of activities (yes, no), types of restricted activities (entering the kitchen or cooking, sitting, or touching or seeing male members, wearing new clothes, and buying or touching medicine). Menstrual hygiene was categorised based on place of bathing: home tap, chhau-dhara (designated taps for those practising Chhaupadi), chhau kuwa (designated well for those practising Chhaupadi), and river. Menstrual hygiene management practice included using a sanitary pad (yes, no), reasons for not using a sanitary pad (costly or unavailability, disposal, and other problems). Similarly, sanitary pad related variables included types of absorbents (sanitary pad, new clothes, homemade sanitary pad, and old washed clothes) and places to store sanitary absorbents (own room, cowshed, and wrapped with other clothes).

Data collection and analysis

The survey tool was developed based on previous literature [1, 2, 14, 29, 31]. For quality assurance, survey tool was pretested among 20 adolescent girls of the adjoining ward (ward no 8) within Mangalsen municipality. Necessary modifications to the survey tool were made mainly in the flow of the pattern of questions and language. The second author (RKT) collected data using the revised questionnaire, and interviews were conducted in the Nepali language. Collected data were entered in Microsoft Excel first, and then necessary data validations and cross-checks were made to avoid possible errors during data entry. Data was exported to Stata (version 14.1) (Stata Crop, Texas, USA). Findings of descriptive analysis were reported with frequency and proportion of Chhaupadi practice. We further estimated the association between outcome and explanatory variables using the Chi-square test.

Research ethics

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chitwan Medical College (CMC), Tribhuvan University. The Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) generally delegates ethical approval authority to academic institutions to provide ethical approval for institutional research [32]. Furthermore, permission was taken from Mangalsen municipality and Achham District Health Office. We obtained written informed consent from the respondents prior to the interview. Participation of the study respondents was voluntary where the respondents could refuse the interview at any time. Any kind of support, including financial incentives, was not provided to the respondents. Furthermore, verbal parental consent was obtained for adolescents below 15 years.

Qualitative component of the study

The qualitative component of the study constituted the policy content review process using the policy-cube framework developed by Buse and colleagues [33]. Initially, the policy cube framework was developed to understand the strength of national policies to combat and prevent diet-related Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) [33]. Then, all the relevant policy documents (constitution, laws, regulations, policies, strategies, directives, judicial orders) were then identified and reviewed, focusing on Chhaupadi eradication. Then, the relevant policy text was extracted and fitted into the framework.

Identification and selection of policy documents

The detail of the relevant policy selection process is presented in Fig 2. We identified relevant policies through web search and consultation with experts involved in the Chhaupadi eradication movement in Nepal. We searched different websites to identify the available policies in Chhaupadi eradication in Nepal. Keywords in web search included Karnali and Sudurpaschim province, harmful Chhaupadi practice, religio-cultural practice, practice, Chhau huts, Chhaupadi eradication, Chhaupadi practice, menstrual hygiene policy and Nepal. The documents search was conducted in June 2020. In addition, the authors (RBK, GNK, DST) consulted with experts having relevant experiences in Chhaupadi eradication and requested them to suggest the relevant additional policies. First, we identified policy documents with components of menstrual hygiene management, reproductive health and Chhaupadi practice. Second, we looked at Chhaupadi specific contents in Constitution, Acts, Regulations, policy, directives, and plans of three layers of governments (federal, provincial, and local).

Fig 2. Flowchart of selection of policy and program documents on Chhaupadi eradication in Nepal.

Fig 2

Framework for qualitative data analysis

We used a policy cube framework that comprises three dimensions i) comprehensiveness, ii) political salience with effective means of implementation, and iii) principles of equity and human rights. Comprehensiveness assesses to what extent the existing policies have covered the components to eradicate Chhaupadi practice. First, we reviewed the content of the federal, provincial, and local level policy documents on Chhaupadi eradication. Second, political salience and effectiveness of means of implementation examined policy authority level, budget line item, and accountability system. We mapped the policies by their level of authority and categorised them into highest, middle, and lowest levels. The highest-level policy documents are comprised of the constitution, national laws, and regulations. Policies, strategies, rules, and action plans formulated by federal, provincial, and local levels were categorised as middle-level documents, while directives, guidelines, action plans and implementation plans are considered the documents with the lowest level of authority [33].

Furthermore, we assessed whether budgetary commitments were stated in different levels of policy documents. We also looked at accountability mechanisms by identifying implementing agencies, independent monitoring systems, and remedial actions for policy non-compliance. Third, the principle of equity and human rights dimension assesses the policies to what extent the principle of human rights and social equity and justice were articulated. Finally, we evaluated whether these documents ensure the right to live with self-dignity and self-determination.

Results

Prevalence of Chhaupadi practice

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic profile and magnitude of Chhaupadi among adolescent girls in Mangalsen municipality. Out of total adolescent girls (N = 221), most (84%) practised Chhaupadi during their last menstruation. Over half (56.1%) of the girls were aged between 15 and17 years. Three-fourth of them were from advantaged ethnic groups. More than half (58.8%) had completed secondary education. Four in five (81%) respondents’ mothers were unpaid workers. A substantial proportion (93.5%, n = 124) of girls who practised Chhaupadi were aged 15–17 years. The daughters of illiterate mothers practised Chhaupadi more (90% of n = 126) than mothers with a secondary level of education (75%, n = 24). The practice was higher among the girls living in a nuclear family (89%, n = 133) compared to joint family (77%, n = 88) (Table 1).

Table 1. Chhaupadi practice stratified by sociodemographic variables among adolescent girls aged 11–19 years in Mangalsen municipality, Achham district, 2017.

Variables (N = 221) Total Chhaupadi P-value
n (%) * No (%) # Yes (%) #
Age (years)
11–14 76 (34.4) 22 (29.9) 54 (71.1) 0.001
15–17 124 (56.1) 8 (6.5) 116 (93.5)
18–19 21 (9.5) 5 (23.8) 16 (76.2)
Ethnicity
Disadvantaged ethnicities 54 (24.4) 5 (9.3) 49 (90.7) 0.128
Advantaged ethnicities 167 (75.6) 30 (18.0) 137 (82.0)
Education
Basic (class 6–8) 91 (41.2) 19 (20.9) 72 (79.1) 0.086
Secondary (class 9–12) 130 (58.8) 16 (12.3) 114 (87.7)
Maternal education
Illiterate 126 (57.0) 13 (10.3) 113 (89.7) 0.034
Primary 71 (32.1) 16 (22.5) 55 (77.5)
Secondary and higher 24 (10.9) 6 (25.0) 18 (75.0)
Paternal education
Illiterate 45 (20.4) 3 (6.7) 42 (93.3) 0.090
Primary 108 (48.9) 17 (15.7) 91 (84.3)
Secondary and higher 68 (30.8) 15 (22.1) 53 (77.9)
Mother’s occupation
Unpaid 179 (81.0) 27 (15.1) 152(84.9) 0.527
Paid cash work 42 (19.0) 8 (19.0) 34 (81.0)
Father’s occupation
Job 38 (17.2) 6 (15.8) 32 (84.2) 0.410
Agriculture 127 (57.5) 17 (13.4) 110 (86.6)
Business 31 (14.0) 8 (25.8) 23 (74.2)
Labor 25 (11.3) 4 (16.0) 21(84.0)
Family type
Nuclear 133 (60.2) 15 (11.3) 118 (88.7) 0.022
Joint 88 (39.8) 20 (22.7) 68 (77.3)

P value obtained from the chi-squared test of association.

Significant at p < 0.05.

* Column percentage.

# Row percentage.

Table 2 shows the Chhaupadi related knowledge, restrictions, and hygiene practices among adolescent girls in their last menstrual period. Most (98.2%) girls knew about Chhaupadi. Four in five (84.2%) girls faced restrictions in foods. Likewise, over nine in ten (94.1%) girls faced restrictions in social and household activities. More than two-thirds (70.1%) of girls did not use sanitary pads, while over two-fifth (44.3%) of adolescent girls used new cloth in their last menstrual period. Nearly three quarter (73.5%) of the girls reported high cost and unavailability of the sanitary pad as a reason for not using it. However, the majority (84.8%) of girls who knew about Chhaupadi practised it. Most girls who practised Chhaupadi (86.5% of n = 208) faced social and household level restrictions (Table 2).

Table 2. Knowledge, restrictions, and hygiene practice among adolescent girls in their most recent menstrual period in Mangalsen municipality, Achham district, 2017.

Variables Total (%) * Chhaupadi P-value
Yes (%) # No (%) #
Knowledge about Chhaupadi
Knows about Chhaupadi
Yes 217 (98.2) 184 (84.8) 33 (15.2) 0.001
No 4 (1.8) 1 (25.0) 3 (75.0)
Factors associated with Chhaupadi
Impurity 47 (21.3) 43 (91.5) 4 (8.5) 0.430
God angry 47 (21.3) 40 (85.1) 7 (14.9)
Inadequate knowledge 79 (35.7) 66 (83.5) 13 (16.5)
Societal fear 16 (7.2) 12 (75.0) 4 (25.0)
Sick family members 32 (14.5) 25 (78.1) 7 (21.9)
Person suggesting staying in Chhaupadi huts
Parents 88 (39.8) 73 (83.0) 15 (17.0) 0.917
Grandparents 88 (39.8) 75 (85.2) 13 (14.8)
Relatives/traditional healers 45 (20.4) 38 (84.4) 7 (15.6)
Restriction during menstruation
Bathing in public sources of water
No 82 (37.1) 66 (80.5) 16 (19.5) 0.250
Yes 139 (62.9) 120 (86.3) 19 (13.7)
Food restriction
Yes 186 (84.2) 158 (84.9) 28 (15.1) 0.050
No 35 (15.8) 28 (80.0) 7 (20.0)
Restricted food types
Milk and dairy product 166 (89.2) 142 (85.5) 24 (14.5) 0.018
Vegetable/ fruits 9 (4.8) 5 (55.6) 4 (44.4)
Meat/meat product 11 (5.9) 11 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
Activity restriction
Yes 208 (94.1) 178 (85.6) 30 (14.4) 0.021
No 13 (5.9) 8 (61.5) 5 (38.5)
Activity-related restriction
Entering kitchen/cooking 167 (80.3) 143 (85.6) 24 (14.4) 0.050
Sitting/touching/seeing male member 36 (17.3) 32 (88.9) 4 (11.1)
Wearing new cloth and buying or touching medicines 5 (2.4) 3 (60.0) 2 (40.0)
Bathing places
Home tap 51 (23.1) 38 (74.5) 13 (25.5) 0.174
Chhau-dhara 115(52.0) 99 (86.1) 16 (13.9)
Chhau kuwa 24 (10.9) 21 (87.5) 3 (12.5)
River 31 (14.0) 28 (90.3) 3 (9.7)
Menstrual hygiene
Using sanitary pads
Yes 66 (29.9) 47 (71.2) 19 (28.8) 0.001
No 155 (70.1) 139 (89.7) 16 (11.3)
Reasons for not using sanitary pads
Costly/unavailable 114 (73.5) 106 (93.0) 8 (7.0) 0.024
Disposal and other problems 41 (26.5) 33 (80.5) 8 (19.5)
Types of absorbent used
Sanitary pad 28 (12.7) 17 (60.7) 11 (39.3) 0.004
New cloth 98 (44.3) 87 (88.8) 11 (11.2)
Homemade sanitary pad 62 (28.1) 53 (85.5) 9 (14.5)
Old wash cloth 33 (14.9) 29 (87.9) 4 (12.1)
Places to store absorbent
In own room 133 (60.2) 113 (85.0) 20 (15.0) 0.922
Cowshed 18 (8.1) 15 (83.3) 3 (16.7)
With other clothes 70 (31.7) 58 (82.9) 12 (17.1)

P-value obtained from the chi-squared test of association.

Significant at p < 0.05.

*Column percentage.

#Row percentage.

Chhaupadi eradication policies in Nepal

We reviewed the federal, provincial, and local level policy documents (constitution, laws, regulations, policies, plans, strategies, directives, judicial orders), focusing on the contents of Chhaupadi eradication. The chronological policy trajectory of Chhaupadi eradication is shown in S1 Fig. Findings of policy review explained in three dimensions of policy cube framework: i) comprehensiveness, ii) salience features and effectiveness of means of implementation, and iii) principle of equity and rights. The first and third dimensions, we explained narratively, and the second is presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Salience features and effectiveness of means of implementation of relevant policies on the eradication of Chhaupadi practice in Nepal, 2020.

Level of Authority Policy Document Description Provision related to Chhaupadi Implementing agency Budgetary Commitment Accountability System
Reporting in Public Domain Independent monitoring system Remedial Action/ Mechanism
Highest level Constitution of Nepal (Government of Nepal, 2015) Fundamental law of the country that guarantees the following fundamental rights: the right to live with dignity, right against exploitation, right to equality, rights of women, right to freedom, right relating to food, rights relating to clean environment and rights relating to appropriate housing. Constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights are violated by Chhaupadi customs. Council of Ministers Yes NHRC NHRC Constitutional remedy against the violation of fundamental rights
Right to Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Act, 2018 Making necessary provisions on motherhood and reproductive health service safe and fulfil the right to safe motherhood and reproductive health of the women conferred by the Constitution of Nepal. Legislative provision to provide education, information, counselling, and service relating to sexual and reproductive health to every woman and teenagers. MoHP, LGs Yes Not mentioned NWC Judicial remedy
Criminal (Code) Act, 2017(Government of Nepal, 2017a) Amendment and consolidation of the existing laws related to criminal offences and maintaining law and order in the country. Legislative provision of punishment with up to three months imprisonment and/or NPR 3,000 ($26) fine for those forcing a recently delivered or menstruating woman to stay in a menstrual hut. Ministry of Home Affairs Yes NHRC NHRC, NWC Judicial remedy
Local Government Operation Act 2017(Government of Nepal, 2017b) Legal provision regarding the legislative, executive, and judicial practice of local governments. Legislative provision to ensuring the basic healthcare services, including reproductive healthcare under the jurisdiction of local government. LGs Yes Not mentioned Judicial remedy
Domestic Violence (Offence and Punishment) Act, 2009 (Government of Nepal, 2009) Legal provision respecting the right of every person to live in a secure and dignified life and providing protection to the victim of violence. Legislative provision of punishment with a fine of up to 25,000 (US$ 215) and/or six months of imprisonment for those who commits any acts of domestic violence. Ministry of Home Affairs Yes NHRC NHRC, NWC Judicial remedy
Middle level Chhaupadi malpractice elimination Policy, 2019 (Sudurpaschim Province) Specific policy related to the elimination of Chhaupadi practice was formulated by the provincial government. Awareness and education interventions to change the Chhaupadi customs and ensure the rights of women, their protection and compensation through school education, mobilisation of several stakeholders including traditional healers, local leaders, priests, and local level networks. Provincial, district, municipal and ward level implementation mechanisms are ensured Directed the provincial and local government to allocate resources Not available Not available Not available
Eliminate the Chhaupadi malpractices, superstition, custom and mindset through discouraging it by appropriate legal actions, and punishment measures that encourage or practice Chhaupadi.
Municipal Policy and Plan (Mangalsen Municipality, 2019) Local government plan and policy Commitment to implement education and awareness campaigns in menstrual management and menstrual hut-free municipality Local Government No secured budgetary line-item allocation Not available Not available Not available
Low Level Chhaupadi Practice Elimination Directives, 2008 The directive formulated after the judicial order of 2005 Had immediate interventions like public awareness activities, health education and long-term interventions like women empowerment through proportional participation of women and gradual legal reforms to ensure human rights of women Multisectoral agencies in the district and local levels No secured budgetary allocation Not available Not available Not available

NHRC: National Human Right Commission.

NWC: National Women Commission.

MoHP: Ministry of Health and Population.

LGs: Local Governments.

Comprehensiveness of policies

There are some health and social policies in Nepal on women’s health and reproductive rights; however, they lack an implicit explanation of Chhaupadi eradication strategies. For instance, the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights (SMRHR) Act (2018) has not mentioned the eradication of Chhaupadi practice. Although the Local Government Operation Act (LGOA) (2017) has mentioned ward level jurisdiction on eradicating harmful practices like Chhaupadi, there are no procedural laws, including regulations that delineate the eradication interventions. The Criminal (Code) Act (2017) criminalises the accuser (who promotes the Chhaupadi custom) and imprisons and/or penalizes [22]. Contrarily, the first two years of implementation experience has revealed enervated legal execution [23].

Similarly, some policies lack content and execution and inadequate coherence in constitutional mandates and sectoral policies. For instance, National Health Policy (2019) [34] has not specified any provisions to menstrual healthcare services. The lack of such health policy provision contradicts the constitutional commitment of providing free essential health services for all citizens. Similarly, evidence shows that menstrual restrictions are factors for poor learning achievements and education outcomes among girls and women [35]. However, National Education Policy (2019) [36] has not anticipated any challenges girls face in accessing education during such restriction periods. Likewise, although National Youth Policy (2010) aims to render necessary support to vulnerable youths [37], the policy has not anticipated the issues faced by youths like inferiority complex, deprivation from participation and loss of dignity when girls are forced to follow Chhaupadi practice [35]. In addition, the Mental Health Policy (1996) has not provisioned any psychological problems as a consequence of Chhaupadi practice [38].

Salience features and effectiveness of means of implementation

Table 3 depicts the contents of multilevel (highest, middle, and lowest levels) policy documents with their salience features, implementing agency, budgetary commitments, accountability system, independent monitoring, and remedial mechanisms. The highest-level policy document (constitution, laws, and regulations) must go through the parliamentary approval processes. Such legislative processes have strong legitimacy to influence, induce and/or enforce policy compliance [33]. Consequently, the federal, provincial, and local governments formulate policies, plans and strategies to operationalise the parliament-approved higher-level legal documents. In addition, the lowest level policies constitute directives, strategies, and action plan that neither has robust legislative compliance nor adequate implementation mechanism.

Highest level policy documents (e.g., constitutions, acts and regulations)

The highest level policy documents comprise the constitution, laws, and regulations usually endorsed by the parliament [33]. For example, the constitution of Nepal (2015) commits to prohibit any kind of violence or exploitation on the grounds of religion, social, cultural tradition, or practices. Several national laws have been formulated with this mandate. The national law that had the provision of Chhaupadi practice is the Criminal (Code) Act (2017). This Act has the provision of three months’ imprisonment or a financial penalty of NRs 3,000 (~USD 26) for those forcing a recently delivered or menstruating woman to stay in Chhaupadi huts [22].

Some Acts incorporate Chhaupadi eradication related provisions indirectly, such as the Domestic Violence (Offence and Punishment) Act (2009) [39] and Local Government Operation Act (LGOA) (2017) [40]. The former has the legal provision of imprisonment for any acts of domestic violence, like forcing the girls to stay in Chhaupadi huts. At the same time, the latter ensures the local government’s jurisdiction to implement the activities to eliminate Chhaupadi practice and formulate appropriate legislative measures to provide essential healthcare services. Additionally, the Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Rights (SMRHR) Act (2018) has a legislative provision to ensure access to fundamental rights (education, information, counselling, and health services, including reproductive healthcare) for every woman [41]. However, policies have not specified any provisions for the management of menstrual hygiene and Chhaupadi practice.

Middle-level policy documents (e.g., policies, plans and strategies)

The middle-level policy documents consist of policies, plans and strategies formulated by federal, provincial, and local governments. National Dignified Menstruation Policy (2020) is one of them, which has been drafted and yet to be endorsed [42]. On the other hand, there are some policy efforts from provincial and local governments. For instance, the Chhaupadi Malpractice Elimination Policy (2019) was endorsed by Sudurpaschim Province [43]. Likewise, Mangalsen Municipality endorses an annual work plan and budget (2019) incorporating the provisions to eradicate Chhaupadi practice [4446].

All these documents have considered Chhaupadi practice as superstition and malpractice and have focused on community awareness through education, community mobilisation and mass campaigns for its elimination. However, these documents neither have the commitment of adequate financial resources nor an efficient accountability system of implementation. For instance, there are no financial resources for implementing community awareness activities as suggested by the policies formulated by provinces and local governments. Additionally, such policies lack the provision of a public reporting system, independent monitoring mechanism and remedial actions for any non-compliances.

Lowest policy documents (e.g., directives, strategies, and action plans)

A directive was endorsed to eradicate the Chhaupadi custom in 2008 [47]. This directive had immediate and long-term interventions for preventing Chhaupadi practice. The immediate interventions included public awareness and health education, whereas the long-term interventions consisted of women empowerment through women’s participation and legal reforms that ensured women’s rights. Although this directive urges the district and local level agencies to implement listed interventions, however, is silent about the financial resources required for implementing those activities [47].

Principles of equity and rights

We investigated the extent to which principles of human rights, social equity, and justice are articulated in the prevailing policy documents. Although the constitution has guaranteed the right to live with dignity [20], there were no highest-level policy documents specific to eliminate Chhaupadi practice. Only Criminal (Code) Act (2017) is the national law that has special provisions for Chhaupadi practice; however, this law aims to criminalise those who force to stay in Chhaupadi huts rather than implementing interventions for mitigation [22]. Furthermore, no other national laws ensure access to menstrual hygiene as reproductive health rights and women’s human rights.

Discussion

This study revealed the situation of Chhaupadi practice and the policy initiatives for its eradication in Nepal. Most adolescent girls (84% of N = 221) practised Chhaupadi in the Mangalsen Municipality of Achham district. The practice was higher among the girls aged 15–17 years, whose mothers were illiterate, and those who lived in a nuclear family. These adolescent girls were facing many social problems, restricted in terms of certain foods and other daily activities. Furthermore, girls had poor hygiene practice, especially among Chhaupadi practising girls. The review of policies highlighted a lack of policy documents with the highest level of authority (e.g., Acts, Regulations), which could potentially eliminate Chhaupadi practice and protect women’s reproductive health rights. The Criminal Code Act (2017) is the existing legal document with the highest level of authority, aims to criminalise the one who forces the women to stay in menstrual huts. However, this Act has no provisions to ensure the right of women to access menstrual hygiene. The LGOA (2017) urges the local governments for the implementation of Chhaupadi eradication interventions. But the institutional implementation mechanism is insufficient, including financial, monitoring, and accountable systems.

The magnitude of Chhaupadi practice

Our study reported almost all (98.2%) adolescent girls knew about Chhaupadi, while 84% practised it. These findings were higher than past studies conducted in Achham and adjoining districts. For instance, a survey conducted in Achham [1] reported a slightly low prevalence (72%) of Chhaupadi among Adolescent girls. Consistent with the findings of this study, another study conducted in the adjoining Dailekh district [23] reported 77% of women and girls practising Chhaupadi despite 60% of surveyed girls knowing Chhaupadi was illegal [48]. However, studies conducted in other parts of Nepal have reported lower prevalence [7, 29, 49]. The possible reasons behind the high prevalence in our study could be attributed to the religious and cultural values of Chhaupadi in western Nepal, especially in the Achham district [1, 23]. Furthermore, past media reporting of at least 13 deaths in the last 15 years from Achham district alone revealed how Chhaupadi huts are prevalent, and women and girls are being forced to stay there during their period [50]. Also, the etymology of the word Chhaupadi and its origin [1] indicates that Chhaupadi practice is a deeply-rooted cultural belief in the Achham district. People believe that breaching such cultural practices can result in possible social ostracization or possible misfortune/ bad luck to the family [6, 8, 19, 51].

Several demographics, sociocultural, religious, and societal factors influence Chhaupadi practice, including the age of adolescent girls, maternal education, and type of family. In our study, adolescent girls from all backgrounds were found practising Chhaupadi. The present study revealed that daughters of illiterate mothers and girls belonging to the nuclear family were more likely to practice Chhaupadi than their counterparts; however, caste/ethnicity did not show any association. A plausible explanation could be that an illiterate mother might have poor awareness of the menstruation process and its biological mechanism, which might force adolescent girls to practice those harmful practices. Furthermore, such illiterate women could have great belief in social taboos and superstition, which might largely push them to follow such practices and pass them to new generations [52]. In addition, girls living in nuclear families might be closely observed by their parents during the menstrual and postnatal periods. Hence, the girls might continue to practice it due to fear and family pressure [53]. However, our finding contradicts another study [54]. Inconsistent with the current study, evidence from other parts in Nepal [7] and India [55] showed an association between caste/ethnicity and menstrual practice. In the current study, despite being adolescent girls (Dalits, Janajatis and Brahmin/Chhetri), almost all of them had followed the Hindu religion. As Chhaupadi has some religio-cultural misinformation of the Hindu religion, especially in western Nepal where girls are considered as impure and sins during routine period [56], therefore, are forbidden in many social, cultural, and daily activities [12, 13].

Adolescent girls faced restrictions on performing household chores, including cooking meals, touching male members, and attending cultural and religious ceremonies. Similar prohibitions on food, milk and dairy products were reported despite the need for nutritious diets during the menstruation period [57]. The reasons for restrictions could be the fear that cattle would not produce milk if menstruating girls consume dairy products [1, 58]. Adolescent girls may have some fear of being unwell if they touch anyone during the menstruation periods. Previous evidence revealed women could cause harm if they touch any objects or attend any cultural ceremonies during the menstrual period [5,12]. Previous studies from other settings of Nepal [7, 17, 32, 46, 55, 56] and India [59, 60] reported similar prohibitions during mensuration.

Our study identified hygiene practice and sanitary pads use to be low among adolescent girls. The main reasons for low utilisation could be poor access to and the high cost of sanitary pads. These findings are consistent with another study conducted in the Achham district [1]. In the current study, girls were prohibited from entering the house during their menstrual period. Likewise, in a previous study, girls were forced to do more laborious chores like carrying heavy loads, digging, fetching firewood, and collecting grass [12]. Such physical activities without providing a nutritious diet indicate an extreme form of violence against women, violation of their self-dignity and their reproductive health rights [5].

Policies on eradication of Chhaupadi practice in Nepal

There were some policies and strategies for eliminating the Chhaupadi practice in Nepal. However, several factors were contributing to policy comprehensiveness, effective means of implementation that could cover human rights and the issues of equity.

Comprehensiveness

Discussing the comprehensiveness of policy documents, we did not find any Chhaupadi-specific policy formulated in a holistic approach. Furthermore, we did not find any gold standard literature that explains a comprehensive strategy to eradicate the social custom-like Chhaupadi. However, evidence shows that eradicating other harmful practices like child marriage requires interventions that integrate legal efforts and other supportive interventions. Such comprehensive interventions include empowering girls, educating and mobilising parents and community members, supporting girls for enrollment and continuation in schools and offering economic supports and incentives [61, 62].

In Nepal, Chhaupadi eradication policies are implemented on an ad hoc basis. Most of them are coercive and aim to demolish the menstrual huts or criminalise the accused person without adequate supportive enforcement strategies [6]. For instance, more than 9,210 menstrual huts in 19 districts of Karnali and Sudurpaschim provinces were demolished through a campaign in 2020. More than 6,146 menstrual huts were demolished in the Achham district alone [63]. The Chhaupadi huts were demolished without providing alternative solutions resulting in women being forced to stay in the cowshed during the menstrual period [63]. Although new menstrual huts have been stopped, women are forced to remain in more vulnerable places like cowsheds after demolition.

Non-acceptance by parents-in-law and the psychological fear of getting ill are the reasons behind the prevailing Chhaupadi practice [63]. The existing eradicating approaches, like the demolition of menstrual huts, are not effective. The evidence from the Achham district suggests that more than one-fifth of menstrual huts have been reconstructed again after the demolition campaign [63]. Thus, a multilevel/ multidisciplinary and comprehensive policy framework only could address individual, family, community, and societal barriers for Chhaupadi eradication. Such a comprehensive framework can be designed to adopt a socio-ecological model [62]. It must be embedded in policies of all levels to ensure the right of protection, health, and survival of every woman and girl. Policy interventions need to be targeted and focused on affected communities and individuals through formal/informal systems that may influence to eradicate this centuries-long harmful cultural practice.

Effective means of implementation

Our analysis showed that the Criminal Code Act (2017) [23] is only the policy with the highest level of authority to eradicate Chhaupadi practice. Yet, there are several challenges in its effective implementation. Firstly, it criminalises the one who forces the women to stay in Chhaupadi huts. This person will be no other than a close family member. Filing a criminal charge against own family member could break the social fabric and family relationship.

Furthermore, administrative measures such as arresting the accused person by police and filing a case in district court are even challenging due to over-complicated bureaucratic processes. Likewise, Chhaupadi is a complex and multifaceted problem that requires coordinated efforts from the administration, police, court, schools, health facilities, family, community, and civil society. Thus, implementing coercive measures like the demolition of Chhaupadi huts is ineffective unless obtaining commitments from relevant stakeholders. The governments have enforced several interventions to eradicate Chhaupadi at their local level; however, such efforts often lack concrete action plans, strategies, and adequate financial resources.

Although provincial and local governments have initiated to endorse the policies to eradicate Chhaupadi, there are no specific policies at the federal level to ensure menstrual hygiene or eradicate Chhaupadi practice. The Dignified Menstruation Policy (2019) is the only policy specific to Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM); however, it has not been endorsed yet. The drafted policy has encouraged mobilising religious and social leaders and change agents (individual, group, or community) to eradicate menstruation superstition, accustom, and beliefs. The aforementioned drafted policy also encourages legal actions and reforms, multisectoral and multi-layer coordination to eradicate Chhaupadi practice [42]. Although the document emphasises strong inter-ministerial coordination, the delay in endorsement of this policy was due to a lack of clarity among the sectoral ministries (Health, Education, and the Water Supply) in leadership and taking overall implementation responsibilities [48].

Many policy documents lack a public reporting mechanism, independent monitoring system, and provision of remedial actions for any non-compliance, resulting in weak policy implementation. For example, a multi-country study conducted in Africa (Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania) showed the lack of policy coherence, enforcement, accountability mechanisms, and adequate financing resulted in poor policy implementation [64]. Although integrated actions with clarity in roles and responsibilities, robust reporting mechanism, guaranteeing of confidentiality, and independent investigations mechanism have proven to be effective in policy implementation [64], adequate policy harmonisation is lacking at the implementation level. Moreover, the overlapping roles and responsibilities have created ambiguity in implementation.

Furthermore, our quantitative study suggests a high prevalence of social and cultural aspects of Chhaupadi practice. In contrast, qualitative findings suggest inadequate policy provisions to address those issues at the implementation level. In addition, these policies lack adolescent responsive approaches and hence have not identified evidence-based interventions that can address socially deep-rooted customs on Chhaupadi practice. The Sudurpaschim Province endorsed the Chhaupadi Malpractice Elimination Policy (2018) [43]; but, this policy lacks secured financial resources, a structured policy progress reporting system, an independent monitoring mechanism, and appropriate means for remedial actions.

A policy directive on eliminating the Chhaupadi practice (2008) also had ambiguity in different stakeholders’ roles and responsibilities. Surprisingly, the directive was silent regarding the assurance of financial resources to implement those activities, indicating the directive was endorsed to fulfil the judicial obligation. Earlier, after hearing the case of Dil Bahadur Bishwakarma and others versus Cabinet Secretariat (Writ No. 7531 of the year 2005), the supreme court ordered the government to eliminate Chhaupadi practice with appropriate legal reforms and community mobilisation [47]. This argument can be substantiated because the national laws to eliminate Chhaupadi practice with appropriate legal reforms and community mobilisation were endorsed 12 years after the judicial order [65]. Importantly, quantitative findings revealed many social and cultural practices and restrictions at the ground level; these issues should be addressed by municipal level/context-specific plans and strategies that are yet to be formulated and implemented in coordination with local-level stakeholders.

Principles of equity and rights

The human rights approach in eliminating Chhaupadi practice aims to provide enabling environment to live with dignity, maintain privacy, ensure access to quality healthcare, quality education and the working environment in a gender transformative approach during menstrual periods [66, 67]. There is a paucity of the highest level of policy documents to protect women’s dignity, self-respect, and reproductive health rights associated with Chhaupadi practice.

Forcing girls to live in Chhaupadi huts during the menstrual period violates human rights and survival rights. Further, women/girls are exposed to the risk of malnourishment, infectious diseases, gynaecological complications, psychological impacts, and snakebite [68]. Policies on eradicating Chhaupadi practice are not designed from the human rights perspective, despite Nepal being a signatory of several international conventions and treaties like the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women [69] and the Convention of Rights of the Child [70].

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of the study included a pretested questionnaire. Furthermore, the fourth author (GK), being a law graduate, utilised his expertise to analyse the legal aspects of the content of policy documents. Limitations of the study included: first, the quantitative component of this study was limited to selected wards of Mangalsen municipality among the adolescent girls only due to resources and time constraints. Hence it may not be appropriate to generalise the findings in larger geographic areas or among women of all reproductive ages. Second, analysis of policy documents might not have been able to capture the stories behind the girls practising Chhaupadi or the policy loopholes during implementation. The current study identified some sociocultural and religious work restrictions during the menstrual period due to Chhaupadi practice. However, existing policies are silent towards addressing the issues at the ground level rather than implementing coercive interventions (e.g., demolishing Chhau huts) and criminalizing socio-culturally rooted problems. Future qualitative studies should be conducted to unpack these gaps focusing on why women practice Chhaupadi and explore the gaps in policy and practice. Third, this study integrated qualitative and quantitative methods at the conceptual design stage to understand the detailed perspectives of the prevalence of the Chhaupadi problem and policy provisions for Chhaupadi eradication. The discussion section interprets the findings and draws policy, program, and research implications of Chhaupadi practice. Future studies can be conducted integrating methods at the data collection and data analysis level.

Implications for policy and programs

This study has some implications for programs and policies. Firstly, it emphasised creating an enabling environment where women can access adequate and correct information about their rights, including reproductive health rights and the right to live with dignity. As Chhaupadi practices are rooted in complex sociocultural contexts, eradication strategies should involve individuals, closest family members (male members), communities, local government, and civil society. Multilevel interventions are more effective than a single component in changing harmful traditional practices [13]. Second, legal approaches against Chhaupadi will only be effective if they create an enabling environment involving stakeholders across different levels [7]. So, local governments can formulate specific policies that can engage the community and the key stakeholders to implement, monitor, and evaluate concrete action plans. Third, this study illustrated the need for multisectoral actions to raise awareness through different platforms (e.g., health facilities, schools, mass media, and social media). Finally, adverse mental conditions have been experienced by women and girls in addition to reproductive health problems and inadequate menstrual hygiene. Thus, mental health needs to be prioritized and services requires to be provided through psychosocial counsellors and trained health service providers.

Conclusions

This study shows a high proportion of adolescent girls’ practice Chhaupadi in western Nepal. The prevalence was high among the girls aged 15–17 years, daughters of illiterate mothers and belonging to nuclear families. Girls have poor hygiene practice during the menstrual period and restrictions in daily personal and family activities. Several policies and programs have been designed and implemented to address this practice; however, these policies are poorly implemented. Poor policy implementation is due to the lack of comprehensive interventions, inadequate and secured financial resources and a fragile accountability system. Thus, it requires formulating policy instruments with strong implementation authority, identifying appropriate interventions, and approaching multilevel stakeholders. For example, the possible eradication strategies could be community-based health awareness intervention using Social Behavior Change Communication tools and engaging the wider population, stakeholders such as parents, grandparents, priests, teachers, traditional healers, and the local government authorities. Furthermore, allocating adequate resources and adopting a solid accountability system are equally important.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Chronological policy trajectory of women rights and eradication of Chhaupadi in Nepal, 2020.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the District Health Office, Achham, Mangalsen Municipality and all the participants who participated in this study.

Disclaimer: Views presented in this article are solely those of the authors, and do not represent views, interest, or funded work of the organisations where authors affiliated.

Data Availability

All relevant data are available within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The authors didn’t receive any funding support for this work.

References

  • 1.Amatya P, Ghimire S, Callahan KE, Baral BK, Poudel KC. Practice and lived experience of menstrual exiles (Chhaupadi) among adolescent girls in far-western Nepal. PLoS One. 2018;13: 1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mukherjee A, Lama M, Khakurel U, Jha AN, Ajose F, Acharya S, et al. Perception and practices of menstruation restrictions among urban adolescent girls and women in Nepal: A cross-sectional survey. Reprod Health. 2020;17: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Robinson H. Chaupadi: The affliction of menses in Nepal. Int J Women’s Dermatology. 2015;1: 193–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2015.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karki, K. B., Poudel, P. C., Rothchild, J., Pope, N., Bobin, N. C., Gurung, Y., et al. Scoping Review and Preliminary Mapping Menstrual Health and Hygiene Management in Nepal. Population Services International Nepal. 2017.
  • 5.Kadariya S, Aro A. R. Chhaupadi practice in Nepal—analysis of ethical aspects. Medicolegal Bioeth. 2015; 53. doi: 10.2147/mb.s83825 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.UNFPA, UNICEF, UNRCO. Literature Review of Harmful Practices in Nepal. 2019. https://nepal.unfpa.org/en/publications/literature-review-harmful-practices-nepal
  • 7.Baumann SE, Lhaki P, Burke J. Assessing the Role of Caste/Ethnicity in Predicting Menstrual Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Nepal. Glob Public Health. 2019;0: 1–14. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1583267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.NFCC. Assessment Study on Chhaupadi in Nepal: Towards a Harm Reduction Strategy. 2015.
  • 9.UNICEF West and Central Africa Regional Office. Menstrual hygiene in schools in two countries of francophone West Africa: Burkina Faso and Niger. Case studies. 2013. https://www.unicef.org/wash/schools/files/MHM_study_report_Burkina_Faso_and_Niger_English_Final.pdf
  • 10.United Nations Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator’s Office. Field Bulletin Chhaupadi in the Far-West. 2011. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Water/ContributionsStigma/others/field_bulletin_-_issue1_april_2011_-_chaupadi_in_far-west.pdf
  • 11.The Kathmandu Post (2018). Teenage girl dies of snake bite in Chhaupadi hut, Kathmandu, Nepal. In: ekantipur.com [Internet]. 2018. http://kathmandupost.ekantipur.com/news/2018-06-11/teenage-girl-dies-of-snake-bite-in-chhaupadi-hut.html.
  • 12.Khadka Niranjan. Chhaupadi Pratha: Women’s Condition and Suffering. Molung Educ Front. 2020;10: 81–92. 10.3126/mef.v10i1.34031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thapa S, Aro AR. ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21: 1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sumpter C, Torondel B. A Systematic Review of the Health and Social Effects of Menstrual Hygiene Management. PLoS One. 2013;8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nabwera HM, Shah V, Neville R, Sosseh F, Saidykhan M, Faal F, et al. Menstrual hygiene management practices and associated health outcomes among school-going adolescents in rural Gambia. PLoS One. 2021;16: 1–26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Belayneh Z, Mekuriaw B. Knowledge and menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent school girls in southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ranabhat D, Nepal S, Regmi B. Menstrual Hygiene Practice and School Absenteeism among Rural Adolescent girls of Kalikot district. Nepal Med Coll J. 2019;21: 258–264. doi: 10.3126/nmcj.v21i4.27614 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dhakal SB, Sah N, Shrestha S. Analysis of menstrual hygiene practices in Nepal: the role of WASH in Schools programme for girls education. 2018; 1–6. https://wedc-knowledge.lboro.ac.uk/resources/conference/41/Dhakal-2870.pdf
  • 19.Morrison J, Basnet M, Bhatta A, Khimbanjar S, Baral S. Analysis of Menstrual Hygiene Practices in Nepal. UNICEF. 2018. https://www.unicef.org/nepal/reports/analysis-menstrual-hygiene-practices-nepal
  • 20.Government of Nepal. Constitution of Nepal, 2015. Kathmandu, Nepal; 2015. http://www.moljpa.gov.np/en/category/constitution/
  • 21.Dahal B.P., Acharya, S., R., Sunar, T. & Parajuli B (2017). Implementing Status of National Laws, Polices and Guideline: A study on situation of implementation status of National laws, policies and Chhaupadi elimination guideline in Karnali, Nepal. Kathmandu: Action Works Nepal & BEE Group. 2017. https://www.actionworksnepal.org/publications/research-report/
  • 22.Government of Nepal. Criminal (Code) Act, 2017 (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu; 2017. http://www.moljpa.gov.np/en/category/acts/
  • 23.Adhikari R. Bringing an end to deadly “menstrual huts” is proving difficult in Nepal. BMJ. 2020;368: 1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Driessnack M, Sousa VD, Mendes IAC. An overview of research designs relevant to nursing: Part 3: Mixed and multiplemethods. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007;15: 1046–1049. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692007000500025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kohrt BA. Vulnerable social groups in postconflict settings: a mixed methods policy analysis and epidemiology study of caste and psychological morbidity in Nepal. Intervention. 2009;7: 239–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.United Nations Children’s Fund, National Planning Commission. Monitoring the situation of children and women Nepal: Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Final Report. Kathmandu, Nepal; 2014. https://www.unicef.org/nepal/reports/multiple-indicator-cluster-survey-final-report-2014
  • 27.National Human Right Commission. National Investigation Program Report on Chhaupadi (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu; 2018.
  • 28.CBS. National Population and Housing Census 2011; National Planning Commission Secretariates, Central Bureau of Statistics. 2012. http://cbs.gov.np/?p=2017
  • 29.Ranabhat C, Kim CB, Choi EH, Aryal A, Park MB, Doh YA. Chhaupadi Culture and Reproductive Health of Women in Nepal. Asia-Pacific J Public Heal. 2015;27: 785–795. doi: 10.1177/1010539515602743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Adhikari TB, Rijal A, Kallestrup P, Neupane D. Alcohol consumption pattern in western Nepal: Findings from the COBIN baseline survey. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van Eijk AM, Sivakami M, Thakkar MB, Bauman A, Laserson KF, Coates S, et al. Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in India: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.NHRC. Health Research System In Nepal. Nepal Heal Res Counc. 2006. http://nhrc.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Health-Research-System-Nepal-2006.pdf
  • 33.Buse K, Aftab W, Akhter S, Phuong LB, Chemli H, Dahal M, et al. The state of diet-related NCD policies in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, Tunisia and Vietnam: a comparative assessment that introduces a “policy cube” approach. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35: 503–21. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ministry of Health and Population. National Health Policy 2019 (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu, Nepal; 2019. https://dohs.gov.np/national-health-policy-2074/
  • 35.Paudel R. Menstrual Restrictions and Its Impact on Learning and Education: A Case from Jumla, Nepal. Arch Women Heal Care. 2020;3: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Government of Nepal. National Education Policy, 2019 (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu; 2019.
  • 37.Government of Nepal. National Youth Policy, 2010 (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu; 2010.
  • 38.Upadhaya K. National mental health policy-1996, what has been achieved: a review. J Psychiatr Assoc Nepal. 2013;2: 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Government of Nepal. Domestic Violence (Offence and Punishment) Act, 2009 (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu, Nepal; 2009. https://www.lawcommission.gov.np/en/archives/document-category/existing-law-statues-acts/
  • 40.Government of Nepal. Local Government Operation Act, 2017 (Unofficial Translation). 2017. https://mofaga.gov.np/news-notice/1697
  • 41.Government of Nepal. The Right to Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Act 2018 (Unofficial Translation). 2018 pp. 1–13. www.lawcommission.gov.np
  • 42.Governement of Nepal. National Dignified Menstruation Policy (draft) (Unofficial Translation). 2020 pp. 0–19.
  • 43.Ministry of Social Development. Chhaupadi malpractice elimination Policy, 2076 (Unofficial Translation), Sudurpaschim province. 2019.
  • 44.Mangalsen Municipality. Muncipal Policy and Plan (Mangalsen Municipality) (FY2020/2021) (Unofficial Translation). 2020 pp. 0–17.
  • 45.Mangalsen Municipality. Muncipal Policy and Plan (Mangalsen Municipality) (FY2019/2020) (Unofficial Translation). 2019 pp. 0–18.
  • 46.Mangalsen Municipality. Muncipal Policy and Plan (Mangalsen Municipality) (FY2018/2019) (Unofficial Translation). 2018 pp. 0–9.
  • 47.Government of Nepal. Chhaupadi Practice Elimination Directives, 2008 (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu; 2008.
  • 48.Thomson J, Amery F, Channon M, Puri M. What’s missing in MHM? Moving beyond hygiene in menstrual hygiene management. Sex Reprod Heal Matters. 2019;27: 12–15. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1684231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Restless Development Nepal. Abolition of chhaupadi in the far and mid-western region of Nepal: Baseline Report. 2015. http://restlessdevelopment.org/file/abolition-of-chhaupadi-in-nepal-baseline-report-pdf
  • 50.Bhrikuti Rai. Women are still dying after being sent to menstruation huts, but no one is filing complaints. The Kathmandu Post. 2019. https://kathmandupost.com/national/2019/03/22/women-are-still-dying-after-being-sent-to-menstruation-huts-but-no-one-is-filing-complaints
  • 51.Deepa Lama RK. Maternal and Child Health Care in Chhaupadi Pratha, Social seclusion of mother and child after delivery in Achham, Nepal. Publich Heal Res Ser SRM Univ. 2015; 22–33.
  • 52.Upashe SP, Tekelab T, Mekonnen J. Open Access Assessment of knowledge and practice of menstrual hygiene among high school girls in Western Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Baumann SE, Lhaki P, Terry MA, Sommer M, Cutlip T, Merante M, et al. Beyond the Menstrual Shed: Exploring Caste/Ethnic and Religious Complexities of Menstrual Practices in Far-West Nepal. Women’s Reprod Heal. 2021;8: 1–28. doi: 10.1080/23293691.2020.1861413 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dhani Singh. Factors associated with Chhaupadi Pratha and its impact on health of the women in Khaptad Channa Rural Municipality-05, Thakuri Community, Bajhang. 2019. https://www.grin.com/document/539654
  • 55.Khanna A, Goyal RS, Bhawsar R. Menstrual Practices and Reproductive Problems: A Study of Adolescent Girls in Rajasthan. J Health Manag. 2005;7: 91–107. doi: 10.1177/097206340400700103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.United Nations Nepal. Harmful practices in Nepal: Report on community perceptions. 2020. https://nepal.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Harmful%20Practices%20Perception%20Survey.pdf
  • 57.Mohamadirizi S, Kordi M. The relationship between food frequency and menstrual distress in high school females. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2015;20: 689. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.170000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Soliman A, De Sanctis V, Elalaily R. Nutrition and pubertal development. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18: S39–S47. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.145073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kumar A, Srivastava K. Cultural and social practices regarding menstruation among adolescent girls. Soc Work Public Health. 2011;26: 594–604. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2010.525144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Garg S, Sharma N, Sahay R. Socio-cultural aspects of menstruation in an urban slum in Delhi, India. Reprod Health Matters. 2001;9: 16–25. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(01)90004-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Malhotra A, Warner A, McGonagle A, Lee-Rife S. Solutions to End Child Marriage. Int Cent Res Women. 2011. http://www.icrw.org/files/publications/Solutions-to-End-Child-Marriage.pdf
  • 62.Lee-rife S, Malhotra A, Warner A, Glinski AM. What Works to Prevent Child Marriage: A Review of the Evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43: 287–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00327.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.BBC Nepal. Chhaupadi Custom: Psychological reason for staying in menstrual huts after demolition (Unofficial Translation). BBC News. 2021. https://www.bbc.com/nepali/news-56028072
  • 64.Mugwagwa J, Edwards D, de Haan S. Assessing the implementation and influence of policies that support research and innovation systems for health: The cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2015;13: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0010-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nepal Kanoon Patrika D 9723. Dil Bahadur Bishwakarma V. Government of Nepal. 2005.
  • 66.Hennegan JM. Menstrual Hygiene Management and Human Rights: The Case for an Evidence-Based Approach. Women’s Reprod Heal. 2018;4: 212–231. doi: 10.1080/23293691.2017.1388720 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Loughnan L, Mahon T, Goddard R, Bain R, Sommer M. Monitoring Menstural Health in the Sustainable Development Goals. First. In: Bobel C, Winkler IT, Fahs B, Hasson KA, Kissling EA, Robertr T-A, editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies. First. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. pp. 577–592. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shields W. Empowering Nepali Women initiative to help eliminate Chhaupadi by 2030 by training men and boys about gender equality and social norms. Johns Hopkins University. 2020. https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/handle/1774.2/63117/Shields-Capstone%20Project-2020.pdf?sequence=3
  • 69.United Nations. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. 1979. [PubMed]
  • 70.United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child. New York; 1989. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Stefano Federici

26 Apr 2021

PONE-D-21-07352

Menstruation taboos (Chhaupadi) practices in Western Nepal: Magnitude and existing laws and policies for eradication

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Thakuri,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both Reviewers found the manuscript appreciable, although they noted several limitations that should be resolved before publication. Therefore, I invite the authors to address all of the Reviewers' comments.

In addition, I invite the Authors to use a professional English language proofreading service if one of the Authors does not declare to be a native English speaker and to have carefully revised the text.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 10 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Stefano Federici, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Both Reviewers found the manuscript appreciable, although they noted several limitations that should be resolved before publication. Therefore, I invite the authors to address all of the Reviewers' comments.

In addition, I invite the Authors to use a professional English language proofreading service if one of the Authors does not declare to be a native English speaker and to have carefully revised the text.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. You indicated that you had ethical approval for your study. In your Methods section, please ensure you have also stated whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians of the minors (<18) included in the study or  whether the research ethics committee or IRB specifically waived the need for their consent.

3. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.  If the original language is written in non-Latin characters, for example Amharic, Chinese, or Korean, please use a file format that ensures these characters are visible.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript is well-written and informative. It addresses research questions, provides adequate data set and analysis, and I have no problems with any of the conclusions the authors have come regarding the study. It is commendable that authors have shown their hard work through the research in very rural areas of Nepal where the serious problem of the chosen topic exists. It will lend a hand for generalization in rural setting and will be helpful literature for other researchers in similar topic.

However, I would like to suggest some changes the authors could make.

1. In line 33, I would suggest you to correct the line “a century-old harmful cultural practice” as chhaupadi has been rooted for centuries in our country and it is not consistent with your other descriptions about chhaupadi in “Introduction section”.

2. Some grammar and sentence structure throughout the article is a bit off, so I would like to suggest you to use grammar corrector for efficient reading or you can go through the whole article and correct it with some effort.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the ethical clearance you obtained for the work from Chitwan Medical College. Furthermore, in my understanding it’s mandatory to get ethical clearance from Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), so I wanted to know why there is no information about it. (If the ethical clearance from NHRC is not necessary then please let it be as it is)

4. In table 2 under the menstrual hygiene variable it seems categories are repeated (“new cloth” and “New cloth and old wash cloth”). The answer from the respondent might have been repeated here in data analysis. Light on those categories are necessary.

5. In table 3, please check description of highest level of authority as it is not clear (Last line of the description is not clear). The sentence structure and grammar does not match in the last line. Please review it and be sure about your understanding and what you want us to comprehend from the description.

6. As this study looks into the existing laws and policies for eradication of Cahhupadi, addition of data and information regarding middle level and low level authority might help to clear out one of the objective of this study. It seems some lacking in information.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the opportunity to review this timely and important piece of research. The study used a mixed methods approach to determine the magnitude of chhaupadi in a particular geographical area of Nepal and studied the policy context of the practice in the country. While there are many strengths of the study, there are several questions remaining and areas in which the manuscript could be improved for clarity. Below I outline some ideas for improving the manuscript for maximum impact. Overall, the manuscript requires a major revision.

Please see attachment for detailed comments.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Deepmala Rana Bhat

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer Comments_April_22_2021.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):e0256968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256968.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


23 Jun 2021

Reviewer #1

1. In line 33, I would suggest you to correct the line “a century-old harmful cultural practice” as Chhaupadi has been rooted for centuries in our country and it is not consistent with your other descriptions about Chhaupadi in “Introduction section”.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestion. We have corrected it as suggested in the revised manuscript.

2. Some grammar and sentence structure throughout the article is a bit off, so I would like to suggest you to use grammar corrector for efficient reading or you can go through the whole article and correct it with some effort.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We corrected flow of the language and grammatical errors throughout the manuscript.

3. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the ethical clearance you obtained for the work from Chitwan Medical College. Furthermore, in my understanding it’s mandatory to get ethical clearance from Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), so I wanted to know why there is no information about it. (If the ethical clearance from NHRC is not necessary then please let it be as it is).

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your important comment. The Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) usually delegates an ethical approval authority to list of institutions to provide ethical approval at the institutions level [1], IRB of Chitwan Medical College is one of them. So, we obtained approval from CMC for this study. We added following text in the revised manuscript as:

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chitwan Medical College (CMC), Tribhuvan University. The Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) generally delegates ethical approval authority to academic institutions to provide ethical approval for the institutional level researches [1]. Furthermore, permission was taken from Mangalsen municipality and Achham District Health Office. We obtained written informed consent from the respondents prior to the interview.

.

4. In table 2 under the menstrual hygiene variable it seems categories are repeated (“new cloth” and “New cloth and old wash cloth”). The answer from the respondent might have been repeated here in data analysis. Light on those categories are necessary.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for pointing out this. It was overlooked. We again revisited the interview questionnaire and found that categories for this variable in the revised manuscript were: sanitary pad, new cloths, homemade sanitary pad, and old washed cloths.

5. In table 3, please check description of highest level of authority as it is not clear (Last line of the description is not clear). The sentence structure and grammar does not match in the last line. Please review it and be sure about your understanding and what you want us to comprehend from the description.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your comment, we have reviewed the description in the table and rephrased it.

6. As this study looks into the existing laws and policies for eradication of Chhaupadi, addition of data and information regarding middle level and low-level authority might help to clear out one of the objectives of this study. It seems some lacking in information.

Author’s response: Thank you for your important suggestions. We have reviewed and added more information regarding middle and low-level authority in the revised manuscript. We have also included one separate column in the table 3 and added specific description about provision of Chhaupadi for each level of policy documents. Please refer table 3 of the revised manuscript.

Reviewer #2

1.The two key study components, 1) the quantitative survey and 2) the policy review, feel like two separate studies. If being presented in the same manuscript, the authors should consider building a stronger justification for why these two areas in particular were studied, how the results of the two components build on/support each other (mixed methods integration) and discuss linkages between the results from both components. As it reads now the two pieces feel separate. Figure 1 – Integration of quant and qual data- more detail required regarding how the data was integrated (see comment above about mixed methods integration and justifying this choice). A justification statement about the need for and use of mixed methods would add strength to the methods section. Furthermore, a discussion on methods integration would add merit, as it is mentioned in the figure but not discussed in the text. See Fetters and Creswell’s work on mixed methods integration at various states in the research design (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4097839/)

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your insightful comment. We used both (quantitative and qualitative ) methods where the purpose of quantitative survey was to identify the prevalence of Chhaupadi while quantitative method was used to complement and expand the scope of the research gaps [2]. Addressing Chhaupadi requires an in-depth understanding of the problem and enabling policy environments and its effective implementation [3]. Thus, we used multiple methods to identify the recent prevalence and eradication policy initiatives. We have also taken reference of similar past study for design of our study [4] We integrated the quantitative and qualitative study at the conceptual level, firstly, we investigated the magnitude of the problem using quantitative survey, while qualitative study provided the macro-perspective on the policy environment to tackle this harmful religio-cultural practice of normal physiological/biological process of women/girls in our study. In addition, we interpretated quantitative and qualitative findings at the discussion stage linking findings of both methods. Therefore, this study has integrated methods at the conceptual level and findings at the discussion/interpretation stage using multi method findings.

We added a paragraph on the justification for the need of quantitative and qualitative methods for this research. Added text on the methodological justification is as:

We used quantitative and qualitative methods to identify the magnitude of Chhaupadi and review the contents of policies on Chhaupadi eradication respectively [Figure 1]. The purpose of the quantitative survey was to identify the recent magnitude of the problem, while the quantitative method was used to complement and expand the scope of the research gaps [2]. Thus, by taking reference of similar past study [4], we used multiple methods to identify the recent prevalence and eradication policy initiatives. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using face-to-face interview among adolescent girls and content of existing policies were reviewed with the focus on Chhaupadi eradication. Addressing Chhaupadi requires an in-depth understanding of the problem and enabling policy environments and their effective implementation. We integrated the quantitative and qualitative methods at the conceptual level. Firstly, we investigated the magnitude of the problem using a quantitative survey, while qualitative study provided the bigger perspective of the study. In addition, we discussed the quantitative and qualitative findings to draw the policy/program and research implications.

We totally agree with the reviewer, and literature on the mixed methods design, mixed-methods integration should be conducted at the methods, and analysis level (result) [5–7]. As this study used data of two different sources (primary- adolescent girls, and secondary- document review), methodological integration at the methods and analysis stages was not practically possible. Researchers could conduct mixed-methods research design and integrate methods at the data source and analysis level, these limitations could be the topic for further research implication. Revised text in the limitation subsection is as:

………………………Third, this study integrated qualitative and quantitative methods at the conceptual design stage to understand the detailed perspectives of the prevalence of Chhaupadi problem and policy provisions for Chhaupadi eradication and the discussion section to interpret the findings and draw policy, program, and research implications of Chhaupadi practice. Future studies can be conducted integrating methods at the data collection and data analysis level.

2.P4 Line 74/75 is not clear (grammar/language issues).

Author’s response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have reviewed this section and corrected grammar and rephrased this section in the revised manuscript.

3.There are differing discussions in the literature regarding the translation/definition of the root words of “chhaupadi.” See NFCC, Bist, Baumann regarding definitions of chhaupadi. Chhau refers to a “woman’s condition as untouchable” and padi refers to a state of “becoming or being.”

o Bist BS. The effect of religious hazards in health among menstrual women : A case of far-west Nepal. Korean J Public Heal. 2014;9.

o Nepal Fertility Care Center. Assessment Study on Chhaupadi in Nepal: Towards a Harm Reduction Strategy. Kathmandu, Nepal; 2015.

o Baumann, S., Lhaki, P., Terry, M., Sommer, M., Cutlip, T., Merante, M., & Burke, J. (2021) Beyond the Menstrual Shed: Exploring Caste/Ethnic and Religious Complexities of Menstrual Practices in Far-West Nepal. Women’s Reproductive Health.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for suggestion and sharing relevent papers. We have reviewed and cited these papers. Definition of the Chhaupadi has been revised by taking reference of suggested papers. The added text on the definition of Chhaupadi is as:

The word Chhaupadi is derived from a local Raute dialect in the far-west where "Chhau" means untouchable or unclean, and "Padi" means being or becoming [3,8,9]. Thus, Chhaupadi refers to a state of being untouchable/unclean. This harmful practice is deeply-rooted and has been practiced for centuries [10].

4. Updated literature search regarding menstrual restrictions would be beneficial for the reader (i.e., P4 lines 81-81, Amatya (in reference list but not cited here), Baumann 2021 (not in reference list, see above))

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We have cited recent literature in the revised manuscript. We have cited both the suggested papers.

5. For prevalence data, it would be more appropriate to cite the direct source of a research study, rather than the UN field bulletin. For example, P4 line 110 about Chhaupadi prevalence in Accham, the UNICEF MICS would be a more appropriate and rigorous source.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your valuable suggestion. We have cited MICS (2019) finding; however, it only provides province wise prevalence of Chhaupadi. So, we have also cited some other district specific small size study [11] for Chhaupadi prevalence in Achham.

6. Considering the focus of this research on a policy review, a more extensive discussion of the chhaupadi policy history would be beneficial in the introduction. For example, at the end of the introduction, the authors mention policy loopholes, but a stronger discussion and more detailed information about the policies would help the reader understand the limitations in the current policy frameworks. Contextual discussion around the current Criminal Code 2074 is needed.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your insightful suggestion. We have reviewed and added more discussion on Chhaupadi policy history. The added text on policy history is as:

There are many policy documents that are associated with eradication of Chhaupadi. The Constitution of Nepal (2015) ensures the right to equality (Article 18) and right to reproductive health (Article 38). Likewise, Article 24 (1) and Article 29 (2) affirm that "no one shall be treated with any kinds of untouchability or discrimination and no one shall be exploited on the basis of any custom, tradition, culture and practices or any other bases" [12]. Earlier, the Supreme Court outlawed Chhaupadi as malpractice in May 2005. The court further directed the government to take necessary legal arrangements to eliminate Chhaupadi. Later, the Government of Nepal formulated the directives to eliminate Chhaupadi practice in 2008 [13]. Thereafter, many programs such as awareness program with community stakeholders and Chhaupadi sheds demolition campaign have been implemented [9], aiming to eradicate Chhaupadi [14]. Recently, the Criminal Code (2017) criminalizes Chhaupadi and has included the provision of a three-month jail sentence and/or NPR 3,000 (~USD 26) fine for anyone forcing a woman to follow the custom [15].

7. Definition of the Criminal Code is incomplete. Fines are also a component. Ensure that the code is defined accurately and in full in the introduction.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your important suggestion. We have added the accurate definition of the Criminal Code Act (2017) and added the information about punishments provision. The added text on the definition of Criminal Code Act (2017) is as:

The Criminal Code (2017) criminalizes Chhaupadi and has included the provision of a three-month jail sentence and/or NPR 3,000 (~USD 26) fine for anyone forcing a woman to follow the custom [15].

Methods

8. Justify focus on adolescent girls specifically (and why not women as well?). Background on adolescent health should also be added to the introduction to prime the reader on this decision.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We have added the text on the justification for choosing adolescent as:

Adolescence period is the critical stage of habit formation, and most adolescents' girls experience puberty and the first mensuration in their early adolescence. Adolescents usually follow what guardians and society instruct them to do on their health and hygiene and construct their behaviour. So, we decided to recruit adolescent girls for this study.

9. Justify the focus on Achham district, and justify the purposive selection of Mangalsen? Why not select randomly, as was done for the wards? How was the list of all households with adolescent girls compiled/accessed?

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your valuable comments. We added the text in the revised manuscript as:

As available literature suggests, out of seven provinces in Nepal, Chhaupadi is mostly prevalent in Karnali and Sudurpaschim provinces [13,16,17]. Recently many incidents, including deaths in Chhau huts were reported in media over the last decade, especially from Achham district [17–19]. Such incidents indicate that Chhaupadi is still prevalent in Achham district; therefore, we selected the Achham as a study district. Within the district, Mangalsen municipality was selected purposely out of ten local municipalities considering feasibility, time factor, accommodation, and available resources for data collection.

10. For the question, “person forcing to stay in chhaupadi huts?” was “self” an option? If not, why not? Or “other”? The question does not appear to have an exhaustive list of response options (if this cannot be addressed, it should be noted as a limitation). The same comment goes for “factors for chhaupadi practice.”

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your valuable suggestion. We have again revisited the interview questionnaire prepared in Nepali and found that the current translation in English is person suggesting to stay in Chhaupadi huts. In Nepal, Girls usually follow societal norms and values at the family level. They often follow what their parents and elder family members suggest. It is stronger in the case of religio and cultural rituals and practices. Also, Nepalese girls are not so empowered like western girls in terms of taking self-decisions and the situation is even worse in the rural hilly areas of the country. So that we have not included self-option under this variable.

11. Variable, “types of work restriction” appears to include items that are not work related, like wearing new clothes and taking medicine. Please rectify. Variable, absorbents, new clothes is mentioned twice. Work related restriction – response options do not all appear to be about “work.”

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your important suggestions. During Chhaupadi, women and girls are often restricted to perform several daily activities such as cooking, touching others, wearing new clothes, and buying and touching medicines etc. So, here we wanted to capture the activities related restrictions during Chhaupadi practice. We have revisited questionnaire in Nepali and corrected the English translation as: “types of activity restrictions” in the revised manuscript. Regarding repetition of new clothes under types of absorbents variable, It was overlooked from us. We again revisited the interview questionnaire and found that categories for this variable in the revised manuscript were: sanitary pad, new cloths, homemade sanitary pad, and old washed cloths.

12. Were participants compensated in any way for their participation?

Author’s response: Thank you for your query. Participation of the study respondents was voluntary. The respondents could refuse the interview process at any time. There was no provision of any in-kind or monetary support for the respondents. We appreciated all the respondents at the end of interview for their participation.

13. Modifications regarding local dialect are mentioned, but then authors state the interviews were conducted in Nepali. Please clarify. Was the survey conducted on a tablet or pen and paper?

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your important comments. Yes, we have conducted interview in Nepali language. After pretest, we have made necessary modification especially in the flow of questions patterns and Nepali language style. So, there was no further modification of tools in local language. The survey was conducted using pen and paper. We have added text in the method section as:

For quality assurance, survey tool was pretested among 20 adolescent girls of the adjoining ward (ward no 8) within Mangalsen municipality. Necessary modifications were made especially in the flow of the pattern of questions and language style. The second author (RKT) conducted an interview using the revised questionnaire. Interview was conducted in Nepali language using pen and paper.

14. Policy-cube framework requires a citation. Qualitative study documents should be listed. (P8 line 210).

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We have cited paper for policy cube framework. Furthermore, Qualitative study documents (e.g., constitution, laws, regulations, policies, plans, strategies, directives, judicial orders) have been listed in the revised manuscript.

15. Figure 2 “Web searching” language is too vague to be helpful. It would be useful to know the search strategy, such as databases searched and keywords used, time the search was conducted.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your important suggestions. We added following text in the revised manuscript as:

We identified relevant policies through web searching and consulting with some known person in the Chhaupadi eradication movement in Nepal. We performed documents search using keywords (e.g., Karnali and Sudurpaschim province, harmful Chhaupadi practice, religio-cultural practice, practice, Chhau huts, Chhaupadi eradication, Chhaupadi practice, menstrual hygiene policy and Nepal). The documents search was conducted in June 2020.

16. Authors state that the policy cube framework was modified for the study. How so? Author’s state they “coordinated with relevant stakeholders.” Do they mean “consulted”? Further, it would be helpful to know which stakeholders, and justify the choices made. For “documents identified” add “Policy,” as this document review was limited to policy documents, correct?In the final selection box, it would be helpful to state the number that were included in the final review.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your insightful suggestions. We have not modified the policy cube framework so; this might be typo error. We have corrected it. For the policy review, yes, author consulted with the relevant stakeholders. Authors identified some stakeholders considering their relevant experience in Chhaupadi eradication movement and shared our intention to review policies and request them to name the relevant policies on Chhaupadi eradication. Yes, this document review was limited to policy documents. We have added total number of policy documents included for the final review in the final selection box.

17. The authors state 84% practiced chhaupadi on their last menstruation, then state 94% practiced chhaupadi, which is confusing. Please clarify how the second question about practicing chhaupadi was asked.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestion. The overall prevalence of the Chhaupadi practice is 84%. However, there is higher prevalence of Chhaupadi among specific age and ethnic groups compared to their counterparts. We have added revised text in the result section as:

Out of total adolescent girls, most (84%) practised Chhaupadi during their last menstruation. Over half (56.1%) of girls were between 15-17 years of age. Three-fourth were from advantaged ethnic groups. More than half (58.8%) had completed secondary education. Four in five (81%) respondents' mothers were unpaid workers. A substantial proportion (93.5%, n=124) of Chhaupadi practice was among 15-17 years of age compared to other age groups. The daughters of illiterate mothers practised Chhaupadi more (90% of n=126) compared to mothers with a secondary level of education (75%, n=24). The practice was higher among the girls living in a nuclear family (89%, n=133) compared to joint family (77%, n=88) (Table 1).

18. Dalit and Janajati are distinct ethnic groups with quite different menstrual practices in much of Nepal, based on what is known in the literature. Thus, it was surprising to see them combined for the quantitative analysis. Please justify this choice and discuss limitations of doing so.

Author’s response: Thank you for your suggestion.

We grouped ethnicity based on the Government of Nepal’s caste/ethnicity categorisation. For the reporting in the routine Health Management Information System [20], the Government of Nepal has categorised 123 ethnicities into six broader categories [21]: i) Dalits (Hill and Terai), ii) Janajati (disadvantaged indigenous Hill and Terai caste group), iii) Madhesi ( non-Dalit Terai caste groups), iv) religious minorities (Muslims), v) relatively advantaged indigenous groups (Brahman/Chhetri), and vi) other upper caste groups. Generally, first four groups (i, ii, iii, and iv) are considered as disadvantaged ethnicities while later two groups (v and vi) are advantaged ethnicities.

Based on comparative privilege and taking reference from previous studies [22,23], we have divided ethnicity into two groups merging Janajati with Dalit in one group and Brahman/Chhetri cast groups in another one for our study.

Similarly, another reason is that there were Brahman/Chhetri, Dalits and Janajaties in our study and almost all of them followed Hindi religion. So Chhaupadi as religio-cultural practice based on the Hindu religious root, we merged janajati with Dalit ethnic group.

19. The way the results are discussed is confusing and contradictory at times, the results section should be revised for clarity in presentation of findings. For example, P11 line 275 states 84.8% practice chhaupadi, but at the end of the paragraph on line 281 the authors state 88.8% practice chhaupadi. This is either an error or the variables are not defined clearly in the text. Please rectify.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We reviewed and revised it.

20. Table 2 “Factors associated with chhaupadi” – Can the authors be more specific on what this is measuring? Are these reasons for why it is practiced? Clarity is necessary. If this is asking the question, “Why do you practice chhaupadi?” 4 of the response options seem plausible but the response “lack of education” seems more like a demographic variable that could be compared with chhaupadi practice, rather than a response to this question in the survey. Did respondents say they practice because they are uneducated?

Author’s response: Thank you for bringing this into our attention; as well as allowing us to clarify this in more details. Though there is variable as lack of education, we wanted to capture knowledge as a factor of Chhaupadi practice. Respondent said they practice Chhaupadi because they were unaware and have no knowledge. We have again revisited interview questionaries in Nepali and corrected English translation of this variable as “inadequate knowledge” in the revised manuscript.

21. Some of the variables are non-exhaustive.

o “Bathing in public sources of” appears to be incomplete.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We have reviewed this. The complete name of variable was “Bathing in public source of water” but some part was missed out due to formatting issue of the table. We have addressed this.

22. Figure 3 Readability/formatting can be improved. Full information about each policy/act is required. For example, 1996 simply states “Mental Health Policy,” which is not enough detail for the reader to find and review the document. Similarly, criminal code for 2017, the full details should be provided so reader is able to find more information as needed.

Author’s response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have reviewed and addressed this in the revised manuscript.

23. General comment is that there are many tables and figures, some with overlapping information. Consider reducing/combining where possible. For example, Table 3 and figure 3 could likely be combined, as there is overlapping information. Formatting of table 3 could be improved (capitalization, adjusting width of columns, etc. to improve readability)

Author’s response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have reviewed formatting of the table 3. Also, as per your suggestion, we have kept original figure 3 as supplementary figure.1 to avoid overlapping information.

24. Consistently provide both Nepali year and Gregorian year throughout manuscript. P14 lines 317-319 seems better suited for the introduction section, not the results. Criminal code details P15 lines 355-358- should specify 3 months imprisonment and/or a financial penalty.

Author’s response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have reviewed and addressed this in the revised manuscript. We have added text as:

The national law that had the provision of Chhaupadi practice is the Criminal (Code) Act (2017). This Act has the provision of three months' imprisonment and/ or a financial penalty of NPR 3,000 (~USD 26) for those forcing a recently delivered or menstruating woman to stay in Chhaupadi huts [15].

26. Discussion: Prevalence – Authors state that other studies found lower prevalence rates. It would be helpful if the authors provided some discussion on why it may be the case that their study found such a high prevalence of the practice compared to other studies. Is there something about this particular area or period in which the study was conducted that may be unique?

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your important comments. We added following text in the revised manuscript as:

The possible reasons behind high prevalence in our findings could the religious and cultural values of Chhaupadi are deeply-rooted in that society[17,24]. For example, at least 13 deaths in the last 15 years were reported from Achham district alone due to forceful stay in Chhaupadi huts [25]. Also, there are beliefs that the tradition of Chhaupadi may have originated in Achham since the word Chhaupadi is derived from the local Raute language [17].

27. The results indicate a higher proportion of Dalit and Janajati practicing chhaupadi- how does this relates to what is known in the literature, and why this may this be the case in Achham context? It is interesting that caste/ethnicity did not play a role in chhaupadi practices, as other studies have found caste to be a significant predictor of menstrual practices in Nepal (Baumann et al. 2019) and India (Khanna et al. 2005). It will be important for the authors to compare their findings against other studies in health and menstruation that found caste/ethnicity to be a key variable and discuss why their findings may differ.

Author’s response: Thank you for your important comments. We added following text in the revised manuscript as:

In our study, almost all adolescent girls were from Khas/Arya and Adivasi ethnic group (Dalits, Janajaties and Brahmin/Chhetri), and all of them had followed the Hindu religion. Chhaupadi has been in practice based on the Hindu religio-cultural practices in western Nepal where some women and girls are considered as impure and sins [26] during their mensuration, therefore are forbidden in many social, cultural, and daily activities [27,28].

27. Nuclear vs joint family This is an interesting finding and glad to see that the authors contrasted these findings against another study that found the opposite. Comprehensiveness – p20 – While the authors are correct in stating that there is no gold standard in the literature for addressing chhaupadi specifically, authors could consider reviewing/comparting policies to actions that have been taken to address other harmful practices in Nepal and globally. For example, see dowry, child marriage etc. in UNFPA study: https://nepal.unfpa.org/en/publications/literature-review-harmful-practices-nepal

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your valuable comments. We have reviewed literature and added following text in revised manuscript as:

Evidence shows that eradication of other harmful practice like child marriage requires interventions that integrate legal efforts along with other supportive interventions. Such comprehensive interventions include empowerment of girls, educating and mobilising parents and community members, supporting girls for enrollment and continuation in schools and offering economic supports and incentives [29,30].

28. It is suggested that the authors refrain from value-judgment language, and rather frame the issue in terms of health and rights violations. (e.g., P21 line 515 “bad cultural practice” could be replaced with “harmful cultural practice”)

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We have revised as per the suggestion.

29. The finding regarding policy documents lacking a public reporting mechanism and independent monitoring system is a critical one. It would be helpful if the authors could expand upon this in the discussion (P22 Line 547) to discuss other policies/approaches that have worked effectively (even in context outside of Nepal if necessary) in order to frame the issue with a recommended step moving forward to creating adequate reporting mechanisms. What would/could a strong reporting mechanism look like for Chhaupadi, and what can we learn from what has been done to address similar policy challenges for other issues?

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your valuable suggestions. We have reviewed literature. We added following text in the revised manuscript as:

Most of the policy documents lack public reporting mechanism, independent monitoring system and provision of remedial actions for any non-compliance, which could result in weak policy implementation. A study conducted in African countries (Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania) shows that lack of policy coherence, enforcement, accountability mechanisms, and adequate financing results in poor implementation of policy [31]. Although integrated actions with clarity in roles and responsibilities, strong reporting mechanism, efficient internal reporting of any deviances or misconduct, guaranteeing of confidentiality and independent investigations mechanism have proven to be effective in the implementation of policy [32], most of the policies related to elimination of Chhaupadi are implemented on an ad-hoc basis. Moreover, there are overlapping roles and responsibilities and implementation ambiguity.

30. Author’s state they employed a pretested survey, however, it would add to the strength if they could include more information in the methods section discussing how the survey questions were developed. Were they adapted from an existing pre-tested tool? Were the survey questions pulled from literature on the topic?

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your important comments. The survey tools were developed by the research team based on an extensive literature review. Yes ,we developed survey tools by taking reference of literatures on the topic [17,33–36].

31. “Critical analysis and synthesis of policies” is not necessarily a strength. This is expected in a content review of policy. If there were multiple independent reviewers of the policies it could be argued that would be an added strength to increase rigor and validity, but that doesn’t seem to be the case in this study.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your comments. We agree with you. We have revised it as per your suggestion.

32. Mental health is discussed here, if so, it should be supported by the results of the study.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions.

33. References

7 – Link doesn’t work.

8 – Reference is incomplete.

22 – Provide a link to the code if possible (even if it is in Nepali)

44 – Name is in all caps- not consistent with other references.

40 – Remove “forthcoming” as this is already published.

48 – Reference is incomplete.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. We have checked and corrected references in the revised manuscript.

We would like to thank both the reviewers for their insightful comments and feedback. Thank you so much for inviting us for revision of this manuscript.

Dipendra Singh Thakuri on behalf of all co-authors

Reference

1. NHRC. Health Research System In Nepal. Nepal Heal Res Counc. 2006. Available: http://nhrc.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Health-Research-System-Nepal-2006.pdf

2. Driessnack M, Sousa VD, Mendes IAC. An overview of research designs relevant to nursing: Part 3: Mixed and multiplemethods. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007;15: 1046–1049. doi:10.1590/s0104-11692007000500025

3. Baumann SE, Lhaki P, Burke J. Assessing the Role of Caste/Ethnicity in Predicting Menstrual Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Nepal. Glob Public Health. 2019;0: 1–14. doi:10.1080/17441692.2019.1583267

4. Kohrt BA. Vulnerable social groups in postconflict settings: a mixed methods policy analysis and epidemiology study of caste and psychological morbidity in Nepal. Intervention. 2009;7: 239–264. doi:10.1097/wtf.0b013e3283346426

5. Bazeley P. Integrating data analyses in mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res. 2009;3: 203–207. doi:10.1177/1558689809334443

6. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - Principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48: 2134–2156. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117

7. Moseholm E, Fetters MD. Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodol Innov. 2017;10: 205979911770311. doi:10.1177/2059799117703118

8. UNFPA, UNICEF, UNRCO. Literature Review of Harmful Practices in Nepal. 2019. Available: https://nepal.unfpa.org/en/publications/literature-review-harmful-practices-nepal

9. NFCC. Assessment Study on Chhaupadi in Nepal:Towards a Harm Reduction Strategy. 2015. Available: http://www.nfcc.org.np/2019/10/21/chhaupadi-assessment/

10. Karki, K. B., Poudel, P. C., Rothchild, J., Pope, N., Bobin, N. C., Gurung, Y., Basnet, M., Poudel, M., Sherpa LY. Scoping Review and Preliminary Mapping Menstrual Health and Hygiene Management in Nepal. Population Services International Nepal. 2017.

11. Amatya P, Ghimire S, Callahan KE, Baral BK, Poudel KC. Practice and lived experience of menstrual exiles (Chhaupadi) among adolescent girls in far-western Nepal. PLoS One. 2018;13: 1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208260

12. Government of Nepal. Constitution of Nepal, 2015. Kathmandu, Nepal; 2015. Available: http://www.moljpa.gov.np/en/category/constitution/

13. Kadariya S, R. Aro A. Chhaupadi practice in Nepal - analysis of ethical aspects. Medicolegal Bioeth. 2015; 53. doi:10.2147/mb.s83825

14. Dahal B.P., Acharya, S., R., Sunar, T. & Parajuli B (2017). Implementing Status of National Laws, Polices and Guideline: A study on situation of implementation status of National laws, policies and Chhaupadi elimination guideline in Karnali, Nepal. Kathmandu: Action Works Nepal & BEE Group. 2017. Available: https://www.actionworksnepal.org/publications/research-report/

15. Government of Nepal. Criminal (Code) Act, 2017 (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu; 2017. Available: http://www.moljpa.gov.np/en/category/acts/

16. United Nations Children’s Fund, National Planning Commission. Monitoring the situation of children and women Nepal: Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Final Report. Kathmandu, Nepal; 2014. Available: https://www.unicef.org/nepal/reports/multiple-indicator-cluster-survey-final-report-2014

17. Amatya P, Ghimire S, Callahan KE, Baral BK, Poudel KC. Practice and lived experience of menstrual exiles (Chhaupadi) among adolescent girls in far-western Nepal. PLoS One. 2018;13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208260

18. National Human Right Commission. National Investigation Program Report on Chhaupadi (Unofficial Translation). Kathmandu; 2018.

19. United Nations Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator’s Office. Field Bulletin Chhaupadi in the Far-West. 2011. Available: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Water/ContributionsStigma/others/field_bulletin_-_issue1_april_2011_-_chaupadi_in_far-west.pdf

20. Banstola A, Banstola A. The Epidemiology of Hospitalization for Pneumonia in Children under Five in the Rural Western Region of Nepal: A Descriptive Study. PLoS One. 2013;8: 1–5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071311

21. Umesh G, Jyoti M, Arun G, Sabita T, Yogendra P, Tesfayi G. Inequalities in health outcomes and access to services by caste/ethnicity, province, and wealth quintile in Nepal. DHS Furth Anal Rep. 2019. Available: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FA117/FA117.pdf

22. Khanal V, Adhikari M, Karkee R, Gavidia T. Factors associated with the utilisation of postnatal care services among the mothers of Nepal: Analysis of Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14: 1–13. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-14-19

23. Adhikari TB, Rijal A, Kallestrup P, Neupane D. Alcohol consumption pattern in western Nepal: Findings from the COBIN baseline survey. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19: 1–8. doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2264-7

24. Adhikari R. Bringing an end to deadly “menstrual huts” is proving difficult in Nepal. BMJ. 2020;368: 1–2. doi:10.1136/bmj.m536

25. Bhrikuti Rai. Women are still dying after being sent to menstruation huts, but no one is filing complaints. The Kathmandu Post. 2019. Available: https://kathmandupost.com/national/2019/03/22/women-are-still-dying-after-being-sent-to-menstruation-huts-but-no-one-is-filing-complaints

26. United Nations Nepal. Harmful practices in Nepal: Report on community perceptions. 2020. Available: https://nepal.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Harmful Practices Perception Survey.pdf

27. Thapa S, Aro AR. ‘Menstruation means impurity’: multilevel interventions are needed to break the menstrual taboo in Nepal. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21: 1–5. doi:10.1186/s12905-021-01231-6

28. Niranjan Khadka. Chhaupadi Pratha: Women’s Condition and Suffering. Molung Educ Front. 2020;10: 81–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.3126/mef.v10i1.34031

29. Malhotra A, Warner A, McGonagle A, Lee-Rife S. Solutions to End Child Marriage. Int Cent Res Women. 2011. Available: http://www.icrw.org/files/publications/Solutions-to-End-Child-Marriage.pdf

30. Lee-rife S, Malhotra A, Warner A, Glinski AM. What Works to Prevent Child Marriage : A Review of the Evidence. Stud Fam Plann. 2012;43: 287–303. doi:doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00327.x.

31. Mugwagwa J, Edwards D, de Haan S. Assessing the implementation and influence of policies that support research and innovation systems for health: The cases of Mozambique, Senegal, and Tanzania. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2015;13: 1–7. doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0010-2

32. Transparency International. The business case for speaking up. 2017. Available: https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2017_BusinessCaseSpeakingUp_EN.pdf

33. Sumpter C, Torondel B. A Systematic Review of the Health and Social Effects of Menstrual Hygiene Management. PLoS One. 2013;8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062004

34. Van Eijk AM, Sivakami M, Thakkar MB, Bauman A, Laserson KF, Coates S, et al. Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in India: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010290

35. Mukherjee A, Lama M, Khakurel U, Jha AN, Ajose F, Acharya S, et al. Perception and practices of menstruation restrictions among urban adolescent girls and women in Nepal: A cross-sectional survey. Reprod Health. 2020;17: 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12978-020-00935-6

36. Ranabhat C, Kim CB, Choi EH, Aryal A, Park MB, Doh YA. Chhaupadi Culture and Reproductive Health of Women in Nepal. Asia-Pacific J Public Heal. 2015;27: 785–795. doi:10.1177/1010539515602743

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Stefano Federici

2 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-07352R1

A harmful religio-cultural practice (Chhaupadi) during menstruation among adolescent girls in Nepal: Prevalence and policies for eradication

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Thakuri,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

 I invite the Authors to use a professional English language proofreading service if one of the Authors does not declare to be a native English speaker and to have carefully revised the text.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 16 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Stefano Federici, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

I invite the Authors to use a professional English language proofreading service if one of the Authors does not declare to be a native English speaker and to have carefully revised the text.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I wish congratulations to authors for their hard work and completing this research article. I was happy to review the article. And in my opinion, authors have done pretty good job in addressing the reviews and corrected every issues. So, I don't have any other comment regarding the article. This article is in line with PLOS ONE's criteria and fulfilled it.

I thank the Journal for this opportunity.

Reviewer #2: Thanks to the authors for their rigorous dedication to addressing all the comments. Just a couple pending notes for the authors:

- In reading through the manuscript I still found a number of places where the grammar could be improved.

- Citation 51 (page 23) is noted in text but not reference list. The following study supports the author's findings about family influence, but is not referred to in the discussion, add it would help to build author's argument (Beyond the Menstrual Shed: Exploring Caste/Ethnic and Religious Complexities of Menstrual Practices in Far-West Nepal - Sara E. Baumann, Pema Lhaki, Martha A. Terry, Marni Sommer,

Trevor Cutlip, Monica Merante, and Jessica G. Burke)

I hope this review was helpful and I enjoyed reading the revised version of this manuscript which will significantly advance knowledge on this topic. Thank you for all your hardwork on this study!

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Deepmala Rana Bhat

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):e0256968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256968.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


18 Aug 2021

Reviewer #1

1. I wish congratulations to authors for their hard work and completing this research article. I was happy to review the article. And in my opinion, authors have done pretty good job in addressing the reviews and corrected every issues. So, I don't have any other comment regarding the article. This article is in line with PLOS ONE's criteria and fulfilled it.

Authors response: Thank you so much for this compliment.

Reviewer #2: Thanks to the authors for their rigorous dedication to addressing all the comments. Just a couple pending notes for the authors:

1. In reading through the manuscript, I still found a number of places where the grammar could be improved.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your suggestions. The final revised manuscript is edited for the flow of the language and grammatical errors. We got language and copy edits support from one of the bilingual (Nepali and English) academic as well as an associate editor of BMC Public Health.

2. Citation 51 (page 23) is noted in text but not reference list.

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your comment, we have reviewed it and corrected in the revised manuscript.

3. The following study supports the author's findings about family influence, but is not referred to in the discussion, add it would help to build author's argument (Beyond the Menstrual Shed: Exploring Caste/Ethnic and Religious Complexities of Menstrual Practices in Far-West Nepal - Sara E. Baumann, Pema Lhaki, Martha A. Terry, Marni Sommer,Trevor Cutlip, Monica Merante, and Jessica G. Burke)

Author’s response: Thank you so much for your comment, we have cited the suggested paper in the revised manuscript.

We would like to thank both the reviewers for their insightful comments and feedback. Thank you so much for inviting us for revision of this manuscript.

Dipendra Singh Thakuri on behalf of all co-authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviwers.doc

Decision Letter 2

Stefano Federici

20 Aug 2021

A harmful religio-cultural practice (Chhaupadi) during menstruation among adolescent girls in Nepal: Prevalence and policies for eradication

PONE-D-21-07352R2

Dear Dr. Thakuri,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Stefano Federici, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Stefano Federici

24 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-07352R2

A harmful religio-cultural practice (Chhaupadi) during menstruation among adolescent girls in Nepal: Prevalence and policies for eradication

Dear Dr. Thakuri:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Stefano Federici

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Chronological policy trajectory of women rights and eradication of Chhaupadi in Nepal, 2020.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer Comments_April_22_2021.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviwers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are available within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES