ABSTRACT
Longitudinal studies of gut microbiota following specific interventions are vital for understanding how they influence host health. However, robust longitudinal sampling of gut microbiota is a major challenge, which can be addressed using in vitro fermentors hosting complex microbial communities. Here, by employing 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, we investigated the adaptation and succession of human fecal microbial communities in an automated multistage fermentor. We performed two independent experiments using different human donor fecal samples, one configured with two units of three colon compartments each studied for 22 days and another with one unit of two colon compartments studied for 31 days. The fermentor maintained a trend of increasing microbial alpha diversity along colon compartments. Within each experiment, microbial compositions followed compartment-specific trajectories and reached independent stable configurations. While compositions were highly similar between replicate units, they were clearly separated between different experiments, showing that they maintained the individuality of fecal inoculum rather than converging on a fermentor-specific composition. While some fecal amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were undetected in the fermentor, many ASVs undetected in the fecal samples flourished in vitro. These bloomer ASVs accounted for significant proportions of the population and included prominent health-associated microbes such as Bacteroides fragilis and Akkermansia muciniphila. Turnover in community compositions is likely explained by feed composition and pH, suggesting that these communities can be easily modulated. Our results suggest that in vitro fermentors are promising tools to study complex microbial communities harboring important members of human gut microbiota.
IMPORTANCE In vitro fermentors that can host complex gut microbial communities are promising tools to investigate the dynamics of human gut microbiota. In this work, using an automated in vitro gut fermentor consisting of different colon compartments, we investigated the adaptation dynamics of two different human fecal microbial communities over 22 and 31 days. By observing the temporal trends of different community members, we found that many dominant members of the fecal microbiota failed to maintain their dominance in vitro, and some of the low-abundance microbes undetected in the fecal microbiota successfully grew in the in vitro communities. Microbiome compositional changes and blooming could largely be explained by feed composition and pH, suggesting that these communities can be modulated to desired compositions via optimizing culture conditions. Thus, our results open up the possibility of modulating in vitro microbial communities to predefined compositions by optimizing feed composition and culture conditions.
KEYWORDS: fecal microbiota, in vitro fermentor
INTRODUCTION
The gut microbiota is a vibrant and diverse community consisting of more than 1,000 bacterial and archaeal species that play a vital role in maintaining host health and well-being (1, 2). Various factors, such as diet, drugs, lifestyle, and host immune system, affect the dynamics of the gut microbiota, and this exerts a significant influence on host metabolic homeostasis (3). Hence, understanding the complex dynamics of the gut microbiota is crucial, especially via longitudinal gut microbiota studies.
Longitudinal gut microbiota studies help not only in decoding the changes in microbial composition and function over time but also in reliably associating these changes with host health and disease conditions. To date, a number of longitudinal studies have been carried out to understand the dynamics of gut microbiota under both healthy and disease conditions (4–6). However, such studies have several drawbacks that limit our interpretations of longitudinal dynamics of the gut microbiota. First, most studies use the fecal microbiota as a representative of the gut microbiota, while the composition and gene expression patterns of the fecal microbiota might be quite different from that of the gut microbiota. Second, consistent and frequent (e.g., daily) sampling of fecal material can be difficult. Third, it is difficult to separate longitudinal gut microbial dynamics from effects of dietary changes and the host immune system. Finally, investigating the effects of certain interventions on human gut microbiota might raise ethical concerns. For example, manipulating the microbiota of an individual (e.g., introduction of a probiotic strain or fecal microbial transplantation) could affect microbiotas of cohabiting individuals or family members who had not consented to that intervention, and evaluating interventions that significantly affect the gut microbiota in humans could irreversibly damage host-microbiome homeostasis (7). In vitro gut models can complement in vivo longitudinal studies to assess the dynamics of gut microbiota. They can simulate gastrointestinal conditions in a precisely controlled manner, allow sampling of active microbial communities in culture, allow consistent and frequent sampling, allow modulation of diet on a flexible schedule, are free from host influence, support culturing and characterization of engineered synthetic gut microbial communities, and do not require ethical approvals (8, 9).
Currently, most available gut models are based on (i) static batch fermentation systems involving small reactors or culture tubes, (ii) semicontinuous fermentation systems involving single fermentors (10–13), or (iii) multistage fermentation continuous systems that involve two or more fermentors connected in series, such as the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME) (14), TIM gastrointestinal model (15), PolyFermS model (16), SIMulator of the GastroIntestinal tract (SIMGI) (17) model, Lacroix model, EnteroMix, and CoMiniGut (18–20). Among the available gut models, SHIME is widely used due to (i) its automation, (ii) the possibility of sampling larger volumes more frequently (although this benefit comes with a requirement for large quantity of feed medium), (iii) the possibility of tightly controlling pH, temperature, and flow rate between the colon regions, (iv) the flexibility to configure multiple parallel units and different compartments, and (v) the possibility of performing longitudinal sampling in consecutive colon regions (14, 21, 22). While a majority of studies used SHIME to test the effects of drugs, xenobiotics, and supplements on in vitro microbial communities (21, 23–26), it can also be used to study microbial ecology (27, 28).
Recent developments in mass spectrometry and high-throughput sequencing technologies are enabling the identification of novel microbial-derived metabolites in the gut and their respective biosynthetic pathways at a much higher pace than before (29–31). Though many metabolites have been discovered from in vivo studies, this discovery process can be accelerated by employing in vitro gut models. While metabolites identified from fecal or gut samples could come from host, diet, or microbiota, the major advantage of in vitro gut models in metabolite discovery is that any identified nonmedium metabolite can be clearly attributed to the microbiota.
In this study, we used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to investigate the adaptation and succession of two different fecal microbial communities over a period of 22 and 31 days using an automated in vitro fermentation system.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Using the SHIME system, we ran two independent experiments (experiment 1 [Exp1] and experiment 2 [Exp2]) with fecal samples obtained from two anonymous human donors (donor 1 and donor 2, respectively). We performed Exp1 with two identical units consisting of ascending (AC), transverse (TC), and descending (DC) colon compartments over 22 days and Exp2 with one unit consisting of AC and DC compartments over 31 days (Fig. S1). We characterized the microbiome from these experiments using 16S rRNA gene V4 variable region amplicon sequencing (see Materials and Methods). We generated 3,031,524 high-quality paired-end reads (median, 20,760 per sample) from 3 fecal inoculum replicates and 143 in vitro samples in Exp1 and 8,117,537 paired-end reads (median, 231,733 per sample) from one fecal inoculum sample and 32 in vitro samples in Exp2. Due to the major difference in sequencing depth between the two experiments, we rarefied all samples to 20,000 high-quality paired-end reads (see Materials and Methods). After merging the rarefied read pairs and removing chimeric amplicons, we obtained 2,279,301 (and 417,882) high-quality amplicon sequences from Exp1 (and Exp2) with 15,682 (and 12,440) median amplicons per sample. From this, we derived 424 amplicon sequencing variants (ASVs) across the two experiments using the DADA2 pipeline (32). In Exp1, we confirmed that the microbiome communities in the two identical units were quite similar in both alpha diversity (ASV richness and ASV Shannon index) and beta diversity (Jensen-Shannon distance based on ASV relative abundances) by comparing corresponding samples (Fig. S2 and S3A). Additionally, using samples collected as technical triplicates on days 2, 7, 12, 17, and 22, we verified the reproducibility of our sample processing and analytical pipeline, measured by alpha diversity (Fig. S3B and S3C) and beta diversity (Fig. S3D). For these time points in Exp1, we consistently chose the second replicate for all further analyses.
Different colon compartments reach individual stable microbiome compositions.
We detected 117 ASVs in donor 1 fecal inoculum, while in the AC, TC, and DC compartments from Exp1, we detected on average 39, 71, and 82 ASVs, respectively, across the study period. In the case of Exp2, we detected 79 ASVs in donor 2 fecal inoculum, while in the AC and DC compartments, we detected on average 36 and 66 ASVs, respectively. This suggests that some ASVs in the fecal samples from both experiments either were permanently lost or went below our detection threshold. To identify our detection threshold, we performed cell counting on the fecal sample in Exp2 and estimated a cell density of 9.3 × 1010 cells/g. At a rarefied read depth of 15,000, we estimated our detection threshold to be 6.2 × 106 cells/g of feces. In addition, the biases inherent to DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing library preparation could affect the detection threshold (33, 34).
In Exp1, after an irregular trend in the first 2 days, the ASV richness declined in all compartments over the week from D5 to D12 (Fig. S2, top left). However, from D12 onward, ASV richness reached different stable values in all three compartments. On the other hand, Shannon diversity of all the compartments in Exp1 showed a declining trend until D12 starting from D2 and thereafter reached stable values only in DC but exhibited an increasing trend in AC and TC (Fig. S2, bottom left). In Exp2, after a declining trend of ASV richness for the first 7 days, it reached stable values in both the compartments (Fig. S2, top right). However, the Shannon diversity of both compartments showed increasing trends until D23, starting from D9 in AC and from D3 in DC. Then, starting from D25, both compartments exhibited instability until the end of the experiment (Fig. S2, bottom right). The colon compartments maintained a trend of increasing alpha diversity from AC to TC to DC compartments for Exp1 and from AC to DC for Exp2 (Fig. S2). This pattern of increasing alpha diversity along AC, TC, and DC compartments is in accordance with an earlier in vitro study that employed SHIME (22).
Next, we investigated community stability in the different compartments in both experiments. For this purpose, we estimated the beta diversity of in vitro samples compared to fecal inoculum and observed that in vitro communities stabilized around D12 in Exp1 (Fig. 1A, top). Since beta diversity measures are thought to saturate at higher magnitude (35), we also estimated community compositional changes at 1-day intervals, which further confirmed that the microbiome communities stabilized at this time point (Fig. 1A, bottom). Similar analysis showed that microbiome compositions also stabilized in Exp2 around D13 (Fig. 1B). Comparing the microbiome compositions of fecal inoculum to samples from all colon compartments, we found that the DC microbiome was closest to the fecal microbiome throughout the experiment, followed by TC and AC microbiomes, in Exp1 (Fig. 1A), whereas the AC microbiome was closest to the fecal inoculum in Exp2 (Fig. 1B). In addition, the highest separation in Exp1 was observed between AC and DC, followed by AC/TC and TC/DC separations (Fig. S4).
We visualized the longitudinal compositional changes in both experiments by performing principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) on the beta diversity and visualizing the first two coordinates. In Exp1, microbiome compositions of different compartments changed dramatically over the first few days and diverged from each other (Fig. 2A). They maintained these diverged compositions, followed different trajectories, and later stabilized at their own individual steady-state compositions. Similarly, in Exp2, AC and DC microbiomes followed different trajectories and stabilized to steady-state compositions after D9 (Fig. 2B). This divergence observed between the compartments in both experiments could be due to the differences in pH, availability of carbohydrates, or bile salt concentration across these compartments (22). A combined PCoA showed that Exp1 and Exp2 microbiomes followed independent trajectories and reached different stable compositions (Fig. 2C), demonstrating that microbial compositions of colonic compartments and their trajectories depend on the composition of the fecal inoculum, thus maintaining individuality, and more importantly that they do not converge toward a common composition inherent to the batch fermentation system (36).
Previous in vitro studies employed short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations as a proxy to determine microbial community stability (37–39). SCFAs are predominantly produced by a limited number of bacteria (40), and there is compelling evidence from both in vitro and in vivo studies that the SCFA concentrations might not reflect the community structure (41–43). Also, cross-feeding on the SCFAs by other members of a community is inevitable in both in vivo and in vitro settings, which could introduce bias in the quantified SCFA levels (44, 45). Therefore, our use of microbiome beta diversity from amplicon sequencing assesses community stability more accurately.
In both experiments, microbial communities in the DC compartment exhibited the highest richness (Fig. S2) and harbored a different composition (Fig. 2) compared to other compartments. While this has been observed before (22), previous studies have not investigated whether this (i) was merely due to the cumulative wash-through of the microbes from the preceding compartments combined with new bacterial growth or (ii) stemmed from the establishment of a different actively growing richer community due to the differences in conditions (e.g., pH, availability of carbohydrates, or bile salt concentrations) between DC and other compartments. As relative abundance cannot reveal whether ASVs expanded in DC, we estimated ASV absolute abundances for Exp2 by performing cell counts on all samples (Fig. S5A) and compared them between AC and DC in all time points (Fig. S5B). While several ASVs detected in AC were not detected in DC (11.1% to 32.5% across all time points) (Fig. S5C), most were detected in DC with an abundance difference within an order of magnitude. This suggests that periodic flow from AC to DC could play a major role in shaping DC microbial composition. However, several ASVs increased in abundance from AC to DC while several others decreased, sometimes by more than an order of magnitude (Fig. S5B). Additionally, 51.5% to 61.5% ASVs detected in DC were not detected in AC (Fig. S5C), several reaching an abundance of >107 cells per ml (Fig. S5B), suggesting that DC conditions were less restrictive. As specific examples, Akkermansia muciniphila [4] (numbers in brackets are ASV IDs) thrived well in DC but was not detectable in AC; Lachnoclostridium [5] thrived in higher abundance in DC than AC; and ASVs such as Prevotella copri [18], Prevotella [42], and Prevotellaceae [28] thrived in higher abundance in AC than DC (Fig. S5D). These observations support the hypothesis that DC harbors a richer actively growing community. Due to the interconnected nature of compartments, we cannot rule out flow of microbial strains from preceding reactors to DC contributing to the increased richness and influencing the composition in DC. Nevertheless, our results imply that the conditions in DC play a pivotal role in establishment and maintenance of an active community with higher richness.
Different dynamics exhibited by microbes during the adaptation and succession.
To gain insights into how microbes adapted to the in vitro fermentor, we analyzed longitudinal relative abundance profiles of ASVs that were detected at at least three time points from each DC compartment (prominent ASVs). Based on hierarchical clustering of their profiles, we identified three major trends: survivors, i.e., prominent ASVs detected in the fecal inoculum that successfully survived in the fermentor; nonsurvivors, i.e., ASVs detected in the fecal inoculum that failed to survive in the fermentor or declined in abundance below the detection threshold; and bloomers, i.e., prominent ASVs which were not detected in the fecal inoculum but which bloomed in the fermentor and mostly maintained their population (Fig. 3). In Exp1, survivors, nonsurvivors, and bloomers accounted for 25%, 48%, and 17% of prominent ASVs, while in Exp2 they accounted for 14%, 44%, and 29%. Overall, a high diversity of bacteria representing different genera were present in all three groups, suggesting that none of the groups was dominated by any particular genus.
The survival and blooming of ASVs were highly dependent on the fecal inoculum used for seeding. Among the 40 survivors in Exp1 and 18 survivors in Exp2, only six ASVs (Bacteroides stercoris [37], Bacteroides vulgatus [24], Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [15], Parabacteroides merdae [51], Subdoligranulum [43] and Blautia [36]) were common to both experiments. Similarly, among the 27 bloomers in Exp1 and 38 bloomers in Exp2, only 4 ASVs (Akkermansia muciniphila [4], Bacteroides fragilis [1], Lachnoclostridium [5], and Eisenbergiella tayi [80]) were common. Five ASVs belonging to Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were present in considerable abundance in each of the fecal inocula. However, only F. prausnitzii [15] survived in both experiments, although with a declining trend. The declining growth of F. prausnitzii could be due to the absence of sugars such as lactose in the feed (46) or to its lower fitness in catabolizing mucin present in the feed compared to more efficient mucin catabolizers, such as A. muciniphila or some Bacteroides spp., that exhibited higher growth (47, 48). In addition, in both experiments, several fecal ASVs could not be detected at any of the time points in the in vitro microbiomes. Around 16% of fecal ASVs from both Exp1 (19 of 117) and Exp2 (13 of 79) went undetected in DC compartments (Fig. S6).
During the adaptation and succession, even dominant ASVs in the fecal microbiomes ended up losing their dominance. In the donor 1 fecal microbiome, the five most abundant ASVs together accounted for >50% of relative abundance: Bacteroides dorei [3] (23%), Faecalibacterium prausnitzii [15] (10%), Sutterella wadsworthensis [9] (6%), Lachnospiraceae sp. [84] (6%), and Blautia sp. [36] (5%). These accounted for only 8% of total relative abundance in the DC compartments after stabilization (3%, 1%, 3%, 0%, and 1% individual average relative abundances, respectively). The same trend was also evident among the 20 most abundant fecal ASVs, which accounted for 80% of relative abundance in the fecal microbiome but a meager 12% in DC microbiomes. In donor 2 fecal microbiome, the five most abundant ASVs accounted for >70% of relative abundance: Prevotella copri [18] (42%), Prevotella [42] (17%), Alloprevotella [77] (7%), Prevotellaceae [139] (4%), and Megamonas funiformis [23] (3%). However, the abundance of these ASVs declined to <10% in the DC compartment.
Enrichment of rare microbes undetected in the fecal microbiome.
Many ASVs that were not detected in the fecal microbiome were consistently detected in the in vitro microbiomes in both experiments. These bloomer ASVs were present in the fecal sample but went undetected, as their density was likely below our detection threshold of 6.2 million cells per g of feces. In all three compartments in Exp1, bloomer ASVs accounted for significant proportions of ASV relative abundance (88%, 76%, and 69% in AC, TC, and DC, respectively). For instance, the top 5 bloomer ASVs in the DC compartments (Bacteroides fragilis [1], Akkermansia muciniphila [4], Lachnoclostridium [26], Lachnoclostridium [5], and Veillonella parvula [10]) constituted >63% of relative abundance after stabilization (Fig. 4A). Similarly, the top 5 bloomer ASVs in the AC compartment constituted >83% and the top 5 bloomer ASVs in the TC compartment constituted >71% of relative abundance (Fig. S7). Compared to Exp1, the bloomer ASVs in Exp2 accounted for lower proportions of ASV relative abundance (18% in AC and 43% in DC). In the same vein, the top 5 bloomer ASVs in DC (A. muciniphila [4], Mitsuokella [34], Bilophila wadsworthia [2], Bacteroides uniformis [21], and Cloacibacillus porcorum [63]) constituted only 21%, and the top 5 bloomers in AC constituted only 13%.
In Exp1, the bloomer B. fragilis [1] was the most abundant ASV after stabilization in AC (60%), TC (50%), and DC (40%) compartments (Fig. 4A; Fig. S7), potentially due to its fitness over other Bacteroides species such as B. dorei [3], which was the most abundant ASV (23%) in donor 1 fecal microbiome, in utilizing a wide variety of carbon sources present in our feed (49, 50). In Exp2, on the other hand, B. fragilis [1] was not detected in the donor 2 fecal microbiome, and its relative abundance was less than 1% in the in vitro samples after stabilization. Instead, B. uniformis [21] bloomed in the DC compartment, albeit to a maximum of 5.1% relative abundance. Donor-dependent trajectories were also observed at other taxonomic levels. For example, the genus Bacteroides maintained its dominance in Exp1 (33% in donor 1 fecal microbiome and 30 to 62% in the in vitro samples), whereas it maintained a lower abundance in Exp2 (<0.1% in donor 2 fecal microbiome and 3% to 18% in the in vitro samples) (Fig. S8). Such a large difference in Bacteroides genus abundance despite the same nutrient composition likely derives from the different ecological constraints inherited from the donor fecal microbial communities. This could suggest that the ecological niche for Bacteroides in Exp1 had room for a new Bacteroides ASV to grow in higher abundance, while the niche in Exp2 did not.
Another prominent bloomer, A. muciniphila, was not detected in the donor 1 or donor 2 fecal samples but bloomed in the TC (14%) and DC (19%) compartments of Exp1 and the DC (8%) compartment of Exp2 after stabilization. Also, in both experiments, A. muciniphila continued to increase in relative abundance until the end of the study, suggesting the availability of excess mucin for its catabolism. From relative abundance data, it was not possible to verify whether A. muciniphila continued to expand in absolute abundance. When we estimated absolute abundances using cell counts in Exp2 (Fig. S5A), we observed that A. muciniphila indeed exhibited a pattern of absolute expansion, while other top ASVs showed a reduction in absolute abundance (Fig. 4B, right). Since A. muciniphila is a highly prevalent commensal in healthy humans, its undetected presence in both fecal inocula is not surprising. It normally accounts for less than 1% of total fecal bacteria (51), which likely explains why we did not detect it in the fecal inocula. Its higher growth under the in vitro conditions is also not surprising, as the nutrient media have ample amounts of mucin (3 g/liter) (52). However, its higher growth especially in the DC compartments compared to other compartments could be due to the more neutral pH (6.6 to 6.9) conditions (28, 53). This possibility of cultivating and enriching undetectably low-abundance microbes present in feces using in vitro fermentors provides a unique opportunity for characterizing rare microbes that cannot be identified using DNA sequencing of the fecal microbiome.
Coherent microbe-exometabolite groups based on correlation network.
In Exp1, we performed untargeted metabolomics analysis on fecal inoculum, fresh media, and supernatants from in vitro samples to understand the differences between the exometabolomes from different compartments and to investigate microbe-metabolite interactions. A total of 3,398 m/z features in positive mode and 10,448 m/z features in the negative mode were detected across all samples (see Materials and Methods for details and Table S1 for the list of mass features). Beta-diversity analysis based on the detected features showed that D1 exometabolome compositions in all three compartments started between fecal and medium metabolite compositions (Fig. 5A). Longitudinal trajectories of the exometabolome compositions were comparable to those of microbiome compositions seen in Fig. 2A—different trajectories for the different compartments stabilizing around D12 at individual stable compositions—reinforcing the connection between the microbiome and exometabolome compositions. Metabolite compositional changes at 1-day intervals further confirmed that the metabolomes stabilized around D12 (Fig. S9). The AC exometabolome was the closest to the medium metabolome, followed by TC and DC exometabolomes, agreeing with the flow between compartments.
Microbes in a community interact with each other via resources such as metabolites. Understanding these interactions in an ecological network is crucial for deriving associations between the members of a community (54). The large difference between the DC exometabolome and the medium metabolome suggested that DC harbored the most biochemically active microbial community, at least in terms of secreted metabolites. Hence, we derived a microbe-exometabolite network for DC compartments using 162 mass features annotated based on tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) fragmentation and 129 prominent ASVs present at at least three time points. We generated a bipartite correlation network, applied community discovery on this network, and identified 6 different coherent groups (Fig. 5B). These coherent groups are different from the traditional microbe-microbe correlation subnetworks (55), as the stratification here is mediated by exometabolites secreted by microbes. For instance, a traditional correlation network might not have grouped S. wadsworthensis [9] with Dorea formicigenerans [118], or Oscillibacter [129] with Lachnospiraceae [190], as their relative abundance profiles were quite different (Fig. 3A). However, they were connected in our bipartite network via exometabolites that correlate with both (Fig. 5B).
Among the exometabolites that were strongly correlated with ASVs, we identified several that were relevant for host health. For instance, kynurenic acid, a neuroprotective (56) and anti-inflammatory (57) metabolite, was positively correlated with Escherichia-Shigella flexneri [61] and V. parvula [49] and negatively correlated with Dorea longicatena [62], Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans [57], and Lachnospiraceae UCG-004 [67] (Fig. 5B). Kynurenine, the substrate for kynurenic acid, is produced by selective cleavage of tryptophan by the enzyme tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase, found in mammals and bacteria (58, 59). The positive correlation of kynurenic acid to Escherichia-Shigella flexneri [61] is in agreement with previous findings that it can be produced by Escherichia coli (60). Another tryptophan-derived metabolite, indole, known for its role in reducing intestinal inflammation, exhibited no positive correlations to any ASVs but only negative correlations to Bifidobacterium dentium [152], Lachnoclostridium [133], and Butyricicoccus [163] (Fig. 5B). This was very surprising, as indole is a prevalent gut microbial metabolite known to be produced by many gut bacteria that harbor the tryptophanase gene (61). However, we observed positive correlations of multiple ASVs to indolelactate in our network, indicating the possibility that most of the free indole might have been converted to other metabolites, such as indolelactate. Various studies have shown that indolelactate is produced mainly by Bifidobacterium spp. (62–64), and the negative association of B. dentium [152] with indole could indicate the conversion of free indole to indolelactate.
Among bile acids and their derivatives, we detected cholic acid, lithocholenic acid, taurocholic acid, and 5β-cholanic acid-3α-ol-7,12-dione. Cholic acid, an unconjugated primary bile acid synthesized from cholesterol in the human liver, was part of the pancreatic juice fed to the colon compartments in abundance. Hence, its positive correlation with multiple highly abundant bloomer and survivor ASVs such as S. wadsworthensis [9] and Parabacteroides distasonis [35] could be due to the continuous accumulation of unmetabolized cholic acid in the media (Fig. 5). We found 27 ASVs negatively correlated with lithocholenic acid, potentially suggesting the conversion of lithocholenic acid to secondary bile acids such as lithocholic acid, isolithocholic acid, ketolithocholic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid, and chenodeoxycholic acid (65). However, we could not confirm the production of these secondary bile acids, as we did not identify these bile acids unambiguously in our metabolomics analysis.
Conclusions.
By evaluating the longitudinal adaptation and temporal variation of two fecal microbial communities in a multistage fecal fermentor, our study sheds light on the dynamics of a complex gut bacterial community grown in vitro under different colonic conditions. Specifically, our study also illuminates the dynamics of some of the interesting and clinically relevant species in a complex in vitro community. For instance, we could study the dynamics of (i) A. muciniphila, a well-known probiotic microbe that plays a significant role in regulating various host functions (66, 67); (ii) S. wadsworthensis, which is associated with inflammation (68); (iii) B. wadsworthia, which is associated with inflammation and intestinal barrier dysfunction (69); (iv) P. distasonis, which is associated with the alleviation of obesity and colitis (70); and (v) F. prausnitzii, which has been negatively correlated with various disease conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, colorectal cancer, obesity, and celiac disease (47, 71). These results imply that in vitro fermentors are suitable for growing and characterizing clinically relevant microbes, both beneficial and detrimental to human health, as part of a complex community similar to the human gut microbiota. Distinct microbial compositions in the two experiments suggest that in vitro fermentors can maintain the individuality of fecal microbiota rather than converging on a fermentor-specific composition. Nevertheless, using an in vitro gut fermentor is not devoid of limitations: in both experiments, less than one-third of fecal ASVs managed to persist in the fermentor after stabilization. This implies that the combination of conditions and feed used here may not be favorable for all members of the gut microbiota. At the same time, another 33 ASVs in Exp1 and 45 ASVs in Exp2 that were not detected in the fecal microbiome (at a detection threshold of 6.2 million cells per g feces) persisted in the fermentor after stabilization, suggesting that in vitro fermentors can enrich the hidden biodiversity in fecal microbiota.
The successful growth of any desired microbe in an in vitro fermentor that harbors a complex and diverse community composition strongly relies on the symphony of both ecological and molecular forces. The diversity of species also means intense competition, but also potentially mutually beneficial relationships. Hence, it is crucial to have the presence of a favorable ecological niche that provides beneficial interactions among the candidate members of a community and the microbes of interest. This can be addressed by modulating the feed and by introducing engineered synthetic communities comprising commensals and mutualists wherein, most importantly, competitors are eliminated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
SHIME setup design, inoculation, and sample collection.
All experiments were carried out using the in vitro digestion model SHIME, specifically the luminal SHIME (L-SHIME). The setups in our experiment were adapted from the TwinSHIME and QuadSHIME models (Fig. S1) (14). Each unit in Exp1 comprised a succession of five compartments (reactors) that simulated stomach (ST), small intestine (SI), ascending colon (AC), transverse colon (TC), and descending colon (DC), while the Exp2 was performed with a combined stomach and small intestine (ST+SI) compartment, an AC compartment and a DC compartment (21). All compartments were continuously stirred at 300 rpm, and the temperature was kept constant at 37°C. Anaerobic conditions were maintained by flushing all compartments with 100% N2. The first two compartments of Exp1 and the first compartment of Exp2 were based on the fill-and-draw principle simulating stomach and small intestine, with a peristaltic pump adding 140 ml SHIME nutritional medium (ProDigest BVBA, Ghent, Belgium) and 60 ml pancreatic and bile liquid (ProDigest BVBA, Ghent, Belgium) in three cycles a day with an 8-h interval between cycles. The SHIME nutritional medium comprised arabinogalactan (1.2 g/liter), pectin (2 g/liter), xylan (0.5 g/liter), glucose (0.4 g/liter), yeast extract (3 g/liter), special peptone (1 g/liter), mucin (3 g/liter), l-cysteine-HCl (0.5 g/liter), and starch (4 g/liter). The pancreatic and bile liquid contained NaHCO3 (12.5 g/liter), oxgall (6g/liter), and pancreatin (0.9 g/liter). The last three compartments of Exp1 and the last two compartments of Exp2 were continuously stirred compartments simulating colonic conditions. In Exp1 and Exp2, for the colon compartments, the volume (V) and the pH were maintained as follows: for Exp1, the AC pH was 5.6 to 5.9 and V was 500 ml, the TC pH was 6.15 to 6.4 and V was 800 ml, and the DC pH was 6.6 to 6.9 and V was 600 ml; for Exp2, the AC pH was 5.6 to 5.9 and V was 500 ml and the DC pH was 6.6 to 6.9 and V was 800 ml.
For the inoculation of colon compartments, the fecal inoculum was prepared from feces obtained from two anonymous human donors with no history of antibiotic use 6 months prior to the study. For this purpose, we used fresh fecal samples (less than 1 h after voiding). Fecal materials were mixed with anaerobic phosphate buffer in a 20% (wt/vol) proportion. The anaerobic phosphate buffer contained K2HPO4 (8.8 g/liter), KH2PO4 (6.8 g/liter), sodium thioglycolate (0.1 g/liter), with the pH adjusted to 7, and was boiled to make it anaerobic. Prior to use, sodium dithionite (15 mg/liter) was added to the buffer and stored at room temperature. The fecal suspension was then homogenized using the Stomacher 400 circulator (Seward, UK) at 300 rpm for 10 min. Upon homogenization, the suspension was centrifuged for 2 min at 500 × g to separate the inoculum (supernatant) from the debris. The inoculation was performed with the resulting fecal inoculum in 5% (vol/vol) proportions in all colon compartments.
For Exp1, samples (1 ml) were collected from AC, TC, and DC compartments in both units on days 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, and 22, and for Exp2, samples were collected every second day for AC and DC compartments from day 1 until day 31. All collected samples were centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 5 min to separate bacterial cells from the culture. In Exp1, for days 2, 7, 12, 17, and 22 as well as for fecal samples, triplicate sampling was performed. Upon centrifugation, both the bacterial pellet and culture supernatants were stored at −80°C for further analysis.
DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.
Genomic DNA from the bacterial pellets was extracted using a NucleoSpin Soil kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany) following the manufacturers’ instructions with a modification in the sample lysis step. For efficient lysis, the bacterial pellets were resuspended in the optional enhancer SX solution and SL1 buffer and homogenized using TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) at a speed of 30 oscillations/s for 5 min. The concentrations and quality of DNA were evaluated using a NanoDrop system and Qubit Fluorometer/microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing targeting the V4 variable region was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 system, producing 2 × 250-bp paired-end reads. Altogether, 3,031,524 high-quality paired-end reads (median, 20,760 per sample) from 3 fecal inoculum replicates and 143 in vitro samples in Exp1 and 8,117,537 high-quality paired-end reads (median, 231,733 per sample) from one fecal inoculum sample and 32 in vitro samples in Exp2 were generated.
Total cell counting.
Cell counting was carried out using the Quantom Tx microbial cell counter (Logos Biosystem, South Korea). The bacterial pellets were resuspended in sterile SHIME nutritional media, and the samples were diluted 10 times. Ten microliters of diluted samples was mixed well with 1 μl of Quantom total cell staining dye, 1 μl of Quantom total cell staining enhancer, and 8 μl of Quantom cell loading buffer I. From the resulting mixture, 6 μl was loaded on a Quantom M50 cell counting slide and centrifuged at 300 × g for 10 min in a Quantom centrifuge. Then, the samples were counted with the Quantom Tx microbial cell counter with the following parameters: light intensity, level 5, size gating, ∼0.3 to 50 μm; roundness, 25%; declustering level, 10; and detection sensitivity, 9.
Bioinformatics and statistical analysis.
All analyses were performed in R software (v3.6.2).
(i) Sequence quality control.
We used the DADA2 v1.16 R package (32) to process the 2 × 250-bp Illumina HiSeq amplicon sequencing reads representing the V4 region of 16S rRNA genes. Primers were removed from raw reads; and reads were filtered and trimmed using the parameter truncLen=c(200,160).
After this, 20,000 high-quality filtered and trimmed reads were randomly selected to remove the confounding effect of sequencing depth between the two experiments. The error-rate-learning step was performed individually for each experiment. Then, reads were dereplicated and merged. Chimeras were identified and removed from the amplicons, leaving 424 unique amplicon sequence variants (ASVs).
(ii) Taxonomic classification of ASV sequences.
Taxonomic classification of ASV sequences was performed using the Silva 138 database (72) following recommended procedure from DADA2 developers: using the assignTaxonomy function (with silva_nr_v138_train_set.fa), which assigns taxonomy up to the genus level, followed by the addSpecies function (with silva_species_assignment_v138.fa), which uses exact sequence matching to assign species.
(iii) Full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing and taxonomic assignment for DC samples.
To improve species-level assignment, we sequenced near-full-length 16S rRNA gene regions from 29 samples from Exp1 (14 DC samples each from unit 1 and unit 2; 1 fecal sample) using PacBio sequel II circular consensus sequencing (CCS) technology using the manufacturer’s recommendation (number 101-599-700, version 03 [February 2020]; Pacific Biosciences, USA). We derived 832,879 high-quality circular consensus sequences (median, 26,555 sequences per sample) using the CCS program v4.2.0 with the following parameters: –min-snr = 3.75 –max-length = 7000 –min-length = 1200 –min-passes = 20 –min-rq = 0.9995 (73). We then generated unique full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences using two approaches: (i) ASVs using the workflow recommended by DADA2 developers (74) and (ii) zero-radius operational taxonomic units (ZOTUs) using the UNOISE algorithm (75). To ensure high reliability, we derived sequences found by both approaches as the full-length ASVs. We then taxonomically annotated these ASVs using the assignSpecies function (with silva_nr99_v138_wSpecies_train_set.fa).
(iv) Improving taxonomy assignment of V4 region ASVs using full-length ASVs.
To improve the taxonomic resolution of the V4 ASVs, we aligned them to the full-length ASVs and transferred better-resolved taxonomy from the latter if a V4 ASV aligned either to only one full-length ASV or to multiple full-length ASVs with identical taxonomy. This increased species-level resolution from 95 to 121. Finally, ASVs without phylum assignment were discarded.
(v) Alpha- and beta-diversity analyses.
Alpha- and beta-diversity analyses were performed using the phyloseq package (v1.30.0). Alpha diversity between colon compartments was compared by applying the Wilcoxon signed-rank test using ASV richness and the Shannon index. Beta diversity analysis was done by calculating the Jensen-Shannon distance.
(vi) Heat map visualization.
For visualization purposes, only prominent ASVs present in at least three time points (including fecal samples) were considered. Heat map rows were ordered based on hierarchical clustering. For visualization, ASV relative abundance was converted to read counts by multiplying with approximate average sequencing depth (20,000 reads) and normalized in log scale by the formula log10 (1+ xi)/max {log10 (1+ xi)}, where xi is the read count for a given ASV in sample i.
(vii) Network analysis.
Correlations (between ASV relative abundances and metabolite abundances) were calculated using Spearman rank correlation. In the bipartite microbe-metabolite network, each node corresponds to either an ASV or a mass feature detected in the DC compartment. Edges in this network connect only ASVs with metabolites (i.e., no links within metabolites themselves or within ASVs). An edge between two nodes corresponds to a correlation, positive or negative, between the corresponding mass feature and ASV, calculated using Spearman’s correlation. In the visualized network, we considered absolute correlation values greater than 0.6 with statistical significance (P ≤ 0.001). In the visualizations, node size corresponds to the degree of the node in the graph, and node color corresponds to its community membership when applying community discovery on the graph using the Louvain method (76).
(viii) Longitudinal trends on cell count.
Since raw cell counts were noisy, cell count longitudinal trends were calculated using a third-degree polynomial model as implemented in the R function lm. The R function predict was applied to extract the values predicted by the lm function, which were used for further analysis.
Metabolomics analysis.
(i) Chemicals and reagents. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade water, acetonitrile, and methanol (MeOH) were purchased from Honeywell (Charlotte, NC, USA). Labeled standards were acquired from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Tewksbury, MA, USA). Electrospray ionization low-concentration (ESI-L) tuning mix was purchased from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Formic acid (≥99.5%), Optima liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) grade, was purchased from Fisher Chemical (Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
(ii) Sample preparation for metabolite extraction. From the supernatants obtained from SHIME compartments, 50 μl of supernatants was treated with 100 μl of 50% MeOH. For quality control and normalization, 50 μl of two internal labeled standard mix of chenodeoxycholic acid-d4 (1 mg/liter) and l-phenylalanine-13C9,15N (1 mg/liter) in MeOH was added to the extraction solvent. Samples were vortexed and precipitated on ice for 30 min. After precipitation, extracts were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4°C for 3 min for protein precipitation and metabolite extraction. The supernatants containing the polar metabolites were collected in LC vials for LC-MS analysis (77).
(iii) Quality control. A pooled sample (quality control sample [QC]) of the reconstituted extracts was prepared by mixing equal volumes of each sample. The pooled sample was further diluted with MeOH at 1:1 and 1:2. To condition the column, the QC sample dilution series was injected at least 3 times before initiating the run. Then, the sample was reinjected every 10 sample injections and at the end of the run to assess instrument stability and analyte reproducibility. An equal volume of a blank sample consisting of 100% MeOH was randomly inserted into the real sample queue to be processed as a needle wash and to equilibrate the column, as well as to avoid contamination among real samples. The analytical reproducibility in terms of detected intensities of detected m/z features was evaluated by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) of detected peaks in QC samples and by visualizing the tight clustering of QC samples in principal-component analysis (PCA) (78).
(iv) Analysis of metabolites by UHPLC–TOF-MS. Metabolomics profiling was performed using an ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system (Agilent 1290 Infinity II) connected to a Bruker timsTOF Pro instrument equipped with a trapped-ion mobility spectrometer (TIMS) coupled to a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOF-MS) (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). Ions were generated in the positive and negative electrospray ionization modes. The samples were randomized and analyzed using reversed-phase Acquity UPLC HSS T3 columns, 100 Å, 1.8 μm, 2.1 mm by 50 mm (Waters, Milford, MA). The column and autosampler temperatures were maintained at 40°C and 10°C, respectively. Solvent A, consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water, and solvent B, consisting of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile and propanol (3:1, vol/vol), were used as mobile phases. The injection volume and flow rate were 5 μl and 0.4 ml/min, respectively. The UPLC gradient was programmed as follows: 0 to 10% B over 0 to 2 min, 99% B (2 to 9 min), 0.1% B (9 to 10 min). The ESI source used 10 liters/min of drying gas at a temperature of 220°C. The ESI was set at a 3,500-V capillary voltage and a 300-kPa nebulizer pressure. Detection of the mass/charge ratio (m/z) of ions was set from 50 to 1,000 over 10 min. To facilitate the compound identifications, QC samples were analyzed by auto-MS/MS in positive and negative electrospray ionization modes. The absolute threshold was set to 1,000 counts. MS and MS/MS spectrum acquisition rates were set to 4 Hz, with a total cycle time of 1 s for precursor ion collection. The collision energy varied between 10 eV and 60 eV.
(v) MS data processing. Data acquisition was performed with otofControl version 6.0 and Bruker Compass HyStar version 5.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), and data processing was performed with Bruker Compass Data Analysis 5.2 software and MetaboScape version 5.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Molecular feature selection, bucketing, filtering, and scaling were performed by MetaboScape to generate the peak lists from MS and MS/MS spectra. An internal calibrant of Na format injected at the beginning of each analysis was used to calibrate the acquired MS and MS/MS data in MetaboScape.
For identification of metabolites, the m/z features obtained from MS analysis were matched to the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB) (https://hmdb.ca). The positive and negative ion adducts [M + H]+, [M + NH4]+, [M + Na]+, [M+H − H2O]+, [M+K]+, [M + Na − 2H]−, [M + Cl]−, and [M − H]− were used during annotation, with a confidence limit of 10 ppm to increase sensitivity in the matching of compounds (66). The MS/MS spectra in MetaboScape were annotated using SmartFormula and by comparing the spectra with previously created MS/MS spectral libraries, such as Bruker HMDB Metabolite Library, Bruker MetaboBASE Personal Library 2.0, Bruker MetaboBASE Personal Library 3.0, MoNA, and MSDIAL-TandemMassSpectralAtlas, with a confidence limit of 5 mDa for parent mass tolerance (79). The complete list of the mass features and their intensities for different time points is available in the supplemental material (Table S1).
(vi) Principal-component analysis. Metabolite peak intensity data normalization was performed as follows: (i) log transformation using to avoid taking log of 0, (ii) z-scoring (mean centered and divided by the standard deviation of each variable). PCA was performed on normalized data utilizing Euclidean distance.
Data availability.
Sequencing reads have been deposited at NCBI Short Read Archive under BioProject identifier PRJNA687518. Metabolomics data have been deposited in the MetaboLights database under study identifier MTBLS2531. Processed microbiome summary data are available as an R phyloseq object at http://arumugamlab.org/SuppData/Gnanasekaran_et_al_2021_microbiome_adaptation/.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful to members of the Arumugam group for inspiring discussions and the anonymous reviewers for critical suggestions to improve the manuscript.
T.G. and M.A. designed the study. T.G., D.W.A., A.K., and K.T. performed experiments. T.G., J.A.G., C.A.-S., C.S., A.K., O.H., V.G., T.M., and M.A. analyzed data. T.M. and M.A. supervised the experiments and analysis. T.G. and M.A. wrote the manuscript. All other authors read, revised, and approved the manuscript.
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research is an independent research center, based at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, and partially funded by an unconditional donation from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (www.cbmr.ku.dk) (grant number NNF18CC0034900). This work was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation grant NNF19OC0057169. C.A.-S. was supported by Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF16CC0020896). C.S. was supported by the Danish Council of Independent Research (grant number 6111-00471B). J.A.G. and O.H. were supported by Novo Nordisk Foundation Challenge program MicrobLiver (grant number NNF15OC0016692).
Contributor Information
Manimozhiyan Arumugam, Email: arumugam@sund.ku.dk.
Nicola Segata, University of Trento.
REFERENCES
- 1.Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, Fernandes GR, Tap J, Bruls T, Batto JM, Bertalan M, Borruel N, Casellas F, Fernandez L, Gautier L, Hansen T, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Kleerebezem M, Kurokawa K, Leclerc M, Levenez F, Manichanh C, Nielsen HB, Nielsen T, Pons N, Poulain J, Qin J, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Tims S, Torrents D, Ugarte E, Zoetendal EG, Wang J, Guarner F, Pedersen O, De Vos WM, Brunak S, Doré J, Weissenbach J, Ehrlich SD, Bork P, MetaHIT Consortium (additional members) . 2011. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 473:174–180. doi: 10.1038/nature09944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thursby E, Juge N. 2017. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 474:1823–1836. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marchesi JR, Adams DH, Fava F, Hermes GDA, Hirschfield GM, Hold G, Quraishi MN, Kinross J, Smidt H, Tuohy KM, Thomas LV, Zoetendal EG, Hart A. 2016. The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut 65:330–339. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schwab C, Berry D, Rauch I, Rennisch I, Ramesmayer J, Hainzl E, Heider S, Decker T, Kenner L, Müller M, Strobl B, Wagner M, Schleper C, Loy A, Urich T. 2014. Longitudinal study of murine microbiota activity and interactions with the host during acute inflammation and recovery. ISME J 8:1101–1114. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang X, Tsai T, Deng F, Wei X, Chai J, Knapp J, Apple J, Maxwell CV, Lee JA, Li Y, Zhao J. 2019. Longitudinal investigation of the swine gut microbiome from birth to market reveals stage and growth performance associated bacteria. Microbiome 7:109. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0721-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bäckhed F, Roswall J, Peng Y, Feng Q, Jia H, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Li Y, Xia Y, Xie H, Zhong H, Khan MT, Zhang J, Li J, Xiao L, Al-Aama J, Zhang D, Lee YS, Kotowska D, Colding C, Tremaroli V, Yin Y, Bergman S, Xu X, Madsen L, Kristiansen K, Dahlgren J, Jun W. 2015. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe 17:852. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.O’Doherty KC, Virani A, Wilcox ES. 2016. The human microbiome and public health: social and ethical considerations. Am J Public Health 106:414–420. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thuenemann EC. 2015. Dynamic digestion models: general introduction, p 33–36. In Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, Requena T, Swiatecka D, Wichers H (ed), The impact of food bioactives on health: in vitro and ex vivo models. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nissen L, Casciano F, Gianotti A. 2020. Intestinal fermentation in vitro models to study food-induced gut microbiota shift: an updated review. FEMS Microbiology Lett 367:fnaa097. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnaa097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miller TL, Wolin MJ. 1981. Fermentation by the human large intestine microbial community in an in vitro semicontinuous culture system. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:400–407. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.3.400-407.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Petrof EO, Gloor GB, Vanner SJ, Weese SJ, Carter D, Daigneault MC, Brown EM, Schroeter K, Allen-Vercoe E. 2013. Stool substitute transplant therapy for the eradication of Clostridium difficile infection: “rePOOPulating” the gut. Microbiome 1:3. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Allison C, McFarlan C, Macfarlane GT. 1989. Studies on mixed populations of human intestinal bacteria grown in single-stage and multistage continuous culture systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:672–678. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.3.672-678.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Auchtung JM, Robinson CD, Britton RA. 2015. Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs). Microbiome 3:42. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0106-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Wiele T, den Abbeele P, Ossieur W, Possemiers S, Marzorati M, 2015. The Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME®), p 305–317. In Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, Requena T, Swiatecka D, Wichers H (ed), The impact of food bioactives on health: in vitro and ex vivo models. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_27. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Minekus M. 2015. The TNO gastro-intestinal model (TIM), p 37–46. In Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, Requena T, Swiatecka D, Wichers H (ed), The impact of food bioactives on health: in vitro and ex vivo models. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16104-4_5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zihler Berner A, Fuentes S, Dostal A, Payne AN, Vazquez Gutierrez P, Chassard C, Grattepanche F, de Vos WM, Lacroix C. 2013. Novel polyfermentor intestinal model (PolyFermS) for controlled ecological studies: validation and effect of pH. PLoS One 8:e77772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barroso E, Cueva C, Peláez C, Martínez-Cuesta MC, Requena T. 2015. Development of human colonic microbiota in the computer-controlled dynamic SIMulator of the GastroIntestinal tract SIMGI. LWT Food Sci Technol 61:283–289. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wiese M, Khakimov B, Nielsen S, Sørensen H, van den Berg F, Nielsen DS. 2018. CoMiniGut-a small volume in vitro colon model for the screening of gut microbial fermentation processes. PeerJ 6:e4268. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Venema K, Van Den Abbeele P. 2013. Experimental models of the gut microbiome. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 27:115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mäkivuokko HA, Saarinen MT, Ouwehand AC, Rautonen NE. 2006. Effects of lactose on colon microbial community structure and function in a four-stage semi-continuous culture system. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 70:2056–2063. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu L, Wang Q, Wu X, Qi H, Das R, Lin H, Shi J, Wang S, Yang J, Xue Y, Mao D, Luo Y. 2020. Vancomycin exposure caused opportunistic pathogens bloom in intestinal microbiome by simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME). Environ Pollut 265:114399. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Van den Abbeele P, Grootaert C, Marzorati M, Possemiers S, Verstraete W, Gérard P, Rabot S, Bruneau A, El Aidy S, Derrien M, Zoetendal E, Kleerebezem M, Smidt H, Van de Wiele T. 2010. Microbial community development in a dynamic gut model is reproducible, colon region specific, and selective for bacteroidetes and Clostridium cluster IX. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5237–5246. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00759-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu YY, Xiao JJ, Fu YY, Liao M, Cao HQ, Shi YH. 2018. Study of factors influencing the bioaccessibility of triazolone in cherry tomatoes using a static SHIME model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu H, Wu B, Zhang XX, Liu S, Yu J, Cheng S, Ren HQ, Ye L. 2016. Arsenic metabolism and toxicity influenced by ferric iron in simulated gastrointestinal tract and the roles of gut microbiota. Environ Sci Technol 50:7189–7197. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cao Y, Liu H, Qin N, Ren X, Zhu B, Xia X. 2020. Impact of food additives on the composition and function of gut microbiota: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 99:295–310. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alander M, De Smet I, Nollet L, Verstraete W, Von Wright A, Mattila-Sandholm T. 1999. The effect of probiotic strains on the microbiota of the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME). Int J Food Microbiol 46:71–79. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00182-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Van Den Abbeele P, Belzer C, Goossens M, Kleerebezem M, De Vos WM, Thas O, De Weirdt R, Kerckhof FM, Van De Wiele T. 2013. Butyrate-producing Clostridium cluster XIVa species specifically colonize mucins in an in vitro gut model. ISME J 7:949–961. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Van Herreweghen F, Van den Abbeele P, De Mulder T, De Weirdt R, Geirnaert A, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Vilchez-Vargas R, Jauregui R, Pieper DH, Belzer C, De Vos WM, Van de Wiele T. 2017. In vitro colonisation of the distal colon by Akkermansia muciniphila is largely mucin and pH dependent. Benef Microbes 8:81–96. doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zou B, Sun Y, Xu Z, Chen Y, Li L, Lin L, Zhang S, Liao Q, Xie Z. 2021. Rapid simultaneous determination of gut microbial phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan metabolites in rat serum, urine, and faeces using LC–MS/MS and its application to a type 2 diabetes mellitus study. Biomed Chromatogr 35:e4985. doi: 10.1002/bmc.4985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Choucair I, Nemet I, Li L, Cole MA, Skye SM, Kirsop JD, Fischbach MA, Gogonea V, Brown JM, Tang WHW, Hazen SL. 2020. Quantification of bile acids: a mass spectrometry platform for studying gut microbe connection to metabolic diseases. J Lipid Res 61:159–177. doi: 10.1194/jlr.RA119000311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ballet C, Correia MSP, Conway LP, Locher TL, Lehmann LC, Garg N, Vujasinovic M, Deindl S, Löhr JM, Globisch D. 2018. New enzymatic and mass spectrometric methodology for the selective investigation of gut microbiota-derived metabolites. Chem Sci 9:6233–6239. doi: 10.1039/C8SC01502C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aird D, Ross MG, Chen WS, Danielsson M, Fennell T, Russ C, Jaffe DB, Nusbaum C, Gnirke A. 2011. Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries. Genome Biol 12:R18. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Velásquez-Mejía EP, de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J, Escobar JS. 2018. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:403–411. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8583-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Morton JT, Toran L, Edlund A, Metcalf JL, Lauber C, Knight R. 2017. Uncovering the horseshoe effect in microbial analyses. mSystems 2:e00166-16. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00166-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.McDonald JAK. 2017. In vitro models of the human microbiota and microbiome. Emerg Top Life Sci 1:373–384. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20170045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fu Y, Zhang J, Chen K, Xiao C, Fan L, Zhang B, Ren J, Fang B. 2019. An in vitro fermentation study on the effects of Dendrobium officinale polysaccharides on human intestinal microbiota from fecal microbiota transplantation donors. J Funct Foods 53:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2018.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moens F, Van den Abbeele P, Basit AW, Dodoo C, Chatterjee R, Smith B, Gaisford S. 2019. A four-strain probiotic exerts positive immunomodulatory effects by enhancing colonic butyrate production in vitro. Int J Pharm 555:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.García-Villalba R, Vissenaekens H, Pitart J, Romo-Vaquero M, Espín JC, Grootaert C, Selma MV, Raes K, Smagghe G, Possemiers S, Van Camp J, Tomas-Barberan FA. 2017. Gastrointestinal simulation model TWIN-SHIME shows differences between human urolithin-metabotypes in gut microbiota composition, pomegranate polyphenol metabolism, and transport along the intestinal tract. J Agric Food Chem 65:5480–5493. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xu Y, Zhu Y, Li X, Sun B. 2020. Dynamic balancing of intestinal short-chain fatty acids: the crucial role of bacterial metabolism. Trends Food Sci Technol 100:118–130. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sze MA, Topçuoğlu BD, Lesniak NA, Ruffin MT, Schloss PD. 2019. Fecal short-chain fatty acids are not predictive of colonic tumor status and cannot be predicted based on bacterial community structure. mBio 1065:e01454-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01454-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gutiérrez N, Garrido D. 2019. Species deletions from microbiome consortia reveal key metabolic interactions between gut microbes. mSystems 4:e00185-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00185-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Baxter NT, Schmidt AW, Venkataraman A, Kim KS, Waldron C, Schmidt TM. 2019. Dynamics of human gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in response to dietary interventions with three fermentable fibers. mBio 10:e02566-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02566-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bourriaud C, Robins RJ, Martin L, Kozlowski F, Tenailleau E, Cherbut C, Michel C. 2005. Lactate is mainly fermented to butyrate by human intestinal microfloras but inter-individual variation is evident. J Appl Microbiol 99:201–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Louis P, Flint HJ. 2009. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett 294:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Azcarate-Peril MA, Ritter AJ, Savaiano D, Monteagudo-Mera A, Anderson C, Magness ST, Klaenhammer TR. 2017. Impact of short-chain galactooligosaccharides on the gut microbiome of lactose-intolerant individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E367–E375. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606722113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Heinken A, Khan MT, Paglia G, Rodionov DA, Harmsen HJM, Thiele I. 2014. Functional metabolic map of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a beneficial human gut microbe. J Bacteriol 196:3289–3302. doi: 10.1128/JB.01780-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Juge N, Tailford L, Owen CD. 2016. Sialidases from gut bacteria: a mini-review. Biochem Soc Trans 44:166–175. doi: 10.1042/BST20150226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Luis AS, Briggs J, Zhang X, Farnell B, Ndeh D, Labourel A, Baslé A, Cartmell A, Terrapon N, Stott K, Lowe EC, McLean R, Shearer K, Schückel J, Venditto I, Ralet MC, Henrissat B, Martens EC, Mosimann SC, Abbott DW, Gilbert HJ. 2018. Dietary pectic glycans are degraded by coordinated enzyme pathways in human colonic Bacteroides. Nat Microbiol 3:210–219. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0079-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Salyers AA, Vercellotti JR, West SEH, Wilkins TD. 1977. Fermentation of mucin and plant polysaccharides by strains of Bacteroides from the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:319–322. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.2.319-322.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Derrien M, Collado MC, Ben-Amor K, Salminen S, De Vos WM. 2008. The mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila is an abundant resident of the human intestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1646–1648. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01226-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Van Herreweghen F, De Paepe K, Marzorati M, Van de Wiele T. 2021. Mucin as a functional niche is a more important driver of in vitro gut microbiota composition and functionality than supplementation of Akkermansia muciniphila. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e02647-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02647-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Van Herreweghen F, De Paepe K, Roume H, Kerckhof FM, Van de Wiele T. 2018. Mucin degradation niche as a driver of microbiome composition and Akkermansia muciniphila abundance in a dynamic gut model is donor independent. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94 65:fiy186. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Foster KR, Bell T. 2012. Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions among culturable microbial species. Curr Biol 22:1845–1850. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D, Raes J, Huttenhower C. 2012. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dehhaghi M, Kazemi Shariat Panahi H, Guillemin GJ. 2019. Microorganisms, tryptophan metabolism, and kynurenine pathway: a complex interconnected loop influencing human health status. Int J Tryptophan Res 12:117864691985299. doi: 10.1177/1178646919852996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Agudelo LZ, Ferreira DMS, Cervenka I, Bryzgalova G, Dadvar S, Jannig PR, Pettersson-Klein AT, Lakshmikanth T, Sustarsic EG, Porsmyr-Palmertz M, Correia JC, Izadi M, Martínez-Redondo V, Ueland PM, Midttun Ø, Gerhart-Hines Z, Brodin P, Pereira T, Berggren PO, Ruas JL. 2018. Kynurenic acid and Gpr35 regulate adipose tissue energy homeostasis and inflammation. Cell Metab 27:378–392.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bugg TDH. 2010. Dioxygenase enzymes and oxidative cleavage pathways, p 583–623. In Liu H-W, Mander L (ed), Comprehensive natural products II: chemistry and biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 59.O’Mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. 2015. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res 277:32–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kuc D, Zgrajka W, Parada-Turska J, Urbanik-Sypniewska T, Turski WA. 2008. Micromolar concentration of kynurenic acid in rat small intestine. Amino Acids 35:503–505. doi: 10.1007/s00726-007-0631-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Beaumont M, Neyrinck AM, Olivares M, Rodriguez J, De Rocca Serra A, Roumain M, Bindels LB, Cani PD, Evenepoel P, Muccioli GG, Demoulin JB, Delzenne NM. 2018. The gut microbiota metabolite indole alleviates liver inflammation in mice. FASEB J 32:6681–6693. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sakurai T, Odamaki T, Xiao JZ. 2019. Production of indole-3-lactic acid by bifidobacterium strains isolated fromhuman infants. Microorganisms 7:340. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Meng D, Sommella E, Salviati E, Campiglia P, Ganguli K, Djebali K, Zhu W, Walker WA. 2020. Indole-3-lactic acid, a metabolite of tryptophan, secreted by Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis is anti-inflammatory in the immature intestine. Pediatr Res 88:209–217. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0740-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ehrlich AM, Henrick B, Pacheco A, Taft D, Xu G, Huda N, Lozada-Contreras M, Goodson M, Slupsky C, Mills D, Raybould H. 2018. Bifidobacterium grown on human milk oligosaccharides produce tryptophan metabolite indole-3-lactic acid that significantly decreases inflammation in intestinal cells in vitro. FASEB J 32:lb359. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.lb359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Malavolti M, Fromm H, Nsien E, Setchell KDR, Albert MB, Cohen B, Ceryak S. 1993. Formation, absorption, and biotransformation of Δ6-lithocholenic acid in humans. Am J Physiol 264:G163–G171. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1993.264.1.G163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Derrien M, Belzer C, de Vos WM. 2017. Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions. Microb Pathog 106:171–181. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang T, Li Q, Cheng L, Buch H, Zhang F. 2019. Akkermansia muciniphila is a promising probiotic. Microb Biotechnol 12:1109–1125. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mukhopadhya I, Hansen R, Nicholl CE, Alhaidan YA, Thomson JM, Berry SH, Pattinson C, Stead DA, Russell RK, El-Omar EM, Hold GL. 2011. A comprehensive evaluation of colonic mucosal isolates of sutterella wadsworthensis from inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS One 6:e27076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Natividad JM, Lamas B, Pham HP, Michel ML, Rainteau D, Bridonneau C, Da Costa G, Van Hylckama Vlieg J, Sovran B, Chamignon C, Planchais J, Richard ML, Langella P, Veiga P, Sokol H. 2018. Bilophila wadsworthia aggravates high fat diet induced metabolic dysfunctions in mice. Nat Commun 9:2802. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05249-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang K, Liao M, Zhou N, Bao L, Ma K, Zheng Z, Wang Y, Liu C, Wang W, Wang J, Liu SJ, Liu H. 2019. Parabacteroides distasonis alleviates obesity and metabolic dysfunctions via production of succinate and secondary bile acids. Cell Rep 26:222–235.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Martín R, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Langella P. 2018. Searching for the bacterial effector: the example of the multi-skilled commensal bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Front Microbiol 9:346. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2012. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wagner J, Coupland P, Browne HP, Lawley TD, Francis SC, Parkhill J. 2016. Evaluation of PacBio sequencing for full-length bacterial 16S rRNA gene classification. BMC Microbiol 16:274. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0891-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Callahan BJ, Wong J, Heiner C, Oh S, Theriot CM, Gulati AS, McGill SK, Dougherty MK. 2019. High-throughput amplicon sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene with single-nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res 47:e103. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Edgar R. 2016. UNOISE2: improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/081257. [DOI]
- 76.Jeub LGS, Bazzi M, Jutla IS, Mucha PJ. 2011-2019. A generalized Louvain method for community detection implemented in MATLAB. https://github.com/GenLouvain/GenLouvain.
- 77.Khan A, Choi Y, Back JH, Lee S, Jee SH, Park YH. 2020. High-resolution metabolomics study revealing L-homocysteine sulfinic acid, cysteic acid, and carnitine as novel biomarkers for high acute myocardial infarction risk. Metabolism 104:154051. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2019.154051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vorkas PA, Isaac G, Anwar MA, Davies AH, Want EJ, Nicholson JK, Holmes E. 2015. Untargeted UPLC-MS profiling pipeline to expand tissue metabolome coverage: application to cardiovascular disease. Anal Chem 87:4184–4193. doi: 10.1021/ac503775m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Olmo-García L, Kessler N, Neuweger H, Wendt K, Olmo-Peinado JM, Fernández-Guti Rrez A, Baessmann C, Carrasco-Pancorbo A. 2018. Unravelling the distribution of secondary metabolites in Olea europaea L.: exhaustive characterization of eight olive-tree derived matrices by complementary platforms (LC-ESI/APCI-MS and GC-APCI-MS). Molecules 23:2419. doi: 10.3390/molecules23102419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Sequencing reads have been deposited at NCBI Short Read Archive under BioProject identifier PRJNA687518. Metabolomics data have been deposited in the MetaboLights database under study identifier MTBLS2531. Processed microbiome summary data are available as an R phyloseq object at http://arumugamlab.org/SuppData/Gnanasekaran_et_al_2021_microbiome_adaptation/.